DOCSLIB.ORG

City of Durham & Orange County

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
City of Durham & Orange County CITY OF DURHAM & ORANGE COUNTY ENO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT WATER AND SEWER SYSTEM PROJECT DRAFT MASTER PLAN REPORT November 2013 Table of Contents Section 1 Introduction 1.1 Project Background and Objectives ............................................................................................................... 1‐1 1.2 Project Area ............................................................................................................................................................. 1‐1 1.3 Scope of Study ......................................................................................................................................................... 1‐2 1.4 Report Format ........................................................................................................................................................ 1‐3 Section 2 Water Demand and Wastewater Flow Projections 2.1 Land Use Assumption .......................................................................................................................................... 2‐1 2.2 Water Demand Projections ............................................................................................................................... 2‐3 2.3 Wastewater Flow Projections .......................................................................................................................... 2‐5 2.4 Phasing and Summary ......................................................................................................................................... 2‐5 Section 3 Evaluation of Existing Water Infrastructure within Eno EDD 3.1 Existing Infrastructure ........................................................................................................................................ 3‐1 3.2 Water Distribution System Evaluation ........................................................................................................ 3‐1 3.2.1 Model Verification .................................................................................................................................... 3‐1 3.2.2 Model Set‐Up and Evaluation Criteria ............................................................................................. 3‐1 3.2.3 Hydraulic Capacity Analysis ................................................................................................................. 3‐3 3.2.4 Summary ...................................................................................................................................................... 3‐4 Section 4 Proposed Wastewater Collection System within the Eno EDD 4.1 Existing Wastewater Collection System ...................................................................................................... 4‐1 4.2 Eno EDD Physical Features ............................................................................................................................... 4‐1 4.2.1 Roadways ..................................................................................................................................................... 4‐1 4.2.2 Hydrography ............................................................................................................................................... 4‐2 4.2.3 Topography ................................................................................................................................................. 4‐4 4.3 Design Criteria ........................................................................................................................................................ 4‐4 4.3.1 Priority Service Areas ............................................................................................................................. 4‐4 4.4 Proposed Wastewater System ......................................................................................................................... 4‐5 4.4.1 Peaking Factor ............................................................................................................................................ 4‐5 4.4.2 Gravity Sewer ............................................................................................................................................. 4‐5 4.4.2.1 Pipe Depth Analysis ................................................................................................................... 4‐5 4.4.2.2 Pipe Capacity ............................................................................................................................. 4‐10 4.4.3 Eno EDD Pump Station ........................................................................................................................ 4‐12 4.4.3.1 Pump Station Location .......................................................................................................... 4‐12 4.4.3.2 Pump Station Capacity .......................................................................................................... 4‐13 4.4.4 Force Main ................................................................................................................................................ 4‐13 i Table of Contents Eno Economic Development District Water and Sewer System Project – Draft Master Plan Report Section 5 Conveyance to City of Durham’s Wastewater Collection System 5.1 Eno EDD Force Main Discharge Alternatives ............................................................................................. 5‐1 5.1.1 Alternative Discharge Locations ......................................................................................................... 5‐1 5.1.2 Interbasin Transfer Considerations .................................................................................................. 5‐3 5.2 Hydraulic Model Set‐Up ...................................................................................................................................... 5‐3 5.2.1 Estimated Peak Hour Design Flows from Eno EDD .................................................................... 5‐3 5.2.2 Eno and Ellerbe Creek Outfall Model Set‐Up ................................................................................. 5‐4 5.2.3 Mud Creek Outfall Model Set‐Up ........................................................................................................ 5‐4 5.3 Capacity Analysis ................................................................................................................................................... 5‐6 5.3.1 Eno Outfall .................................................................................................................................................... 5‐6 5.3.2 Ellerbe Creek Outfall ................................................................................................................................ 5‐6 5.3.3 Mud Creek Outfall ..................................................................................................................................... 5‐6 5.4 Additional Hydraulic Considerations ............................................................................................................ 5‐7 Section 6 Engineers Opinion of Probable Construction Cost 6.1 Construction Cost Assumptions ...................................................................................................................... 6‐1 6.2 Projections Unit Costs to Future Values ...................................................................................................... 6‐2 6.3 Opinion of Probable Construction Cost ........................................................................................................ 6‐2 Section 7 Permit Requirements 7.1 Construction Cost Assumptions ...................................................................................................................... 7‐1 7.2 Authorization to Construct ................................................................................................................................ 7‐1 7.3 Nationwide Permit/ Water Quality Certification ..................................................................................... 7‐1 7.4 Sediment and Erosion Control Plan ............................................................................................................... 7‐2 7.5 Falls Lake Nutrient Management Strategy ................................................................................................. 7‐2 7.6 Building Standards Permit ................................................................................................................................. 7‐2 7.7 Air Quality Registration ...................................................................................................................................... 7‐3 7.8 NC DOT ....................................................................................................................................................................... 7‐3 7.9 Railroad ...................................................................................................................................................................... 7‐3 7.10 Miscellaneous Coordination .............................................................................................................................. 7‐3 Section 8 Conclusions and Recommendations 8.1 Conclusions .............................................................................................................................................................. 8‐1 8.2 Cost
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Appendix a Existing Conditions
    Updated, April 2012 Durham Comprehensive Plan Appendix A Existing Conditions Part 1 Demographics and Economics Durham City-County Planning Department Durham Comprehensive Plan Appendix A, Existing Conditions, Part 1 The Durham Comprehensive Plan Contents Chapter 1. Introduction and Administration Element Chapter 2. Land Use Element Chapter 3. Housing Element Chapter 4. Community Character and Design Element Chapter 5. Historic Preservation Element Chapter 6. Economic Development Element Chapter 7. Conservation and Environment Element Chapter 8. Transportation Element Chapter 9. Water Utilities Element Chapter 10. Parks and Recreation Element Chapter 11. Schools Element Chapter 12. Public Safety Element Chapter 13. Solid Waste Element Chapter 14. Libraries Element Chapter 15. Capital Improvements Element Chapter 16. Intergovernmental Cooperation Element Appendices Durham Comprehensive Plan Appendix A, Existing Conditions, Part 1 Appendix A, Existing Conditions Part 1: Demographics & Economics Chapter Contents Part 1: Demographics and the Economy ..................... 1 Introduction ........................................................................................ 1 Regional Context .................................................................................. 1 Population .......................................................................................... 8 Economy .......................................................................................... 20 Tables Table 1. Population by Race/Ethnicity .......................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Living Water. Eno River State Park: an Environmental Education Learning Experience Designed for the Middle Grades. INSTITUTION North Carolina State Dept
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 376 024 SE 054 365 AUTHOR Hartley, Scott; Woods, Martha TITLE Living Water. Eno River State Park: An Environmental Education Learning Experience Designed for the Middle Grades. INSTITUTION North Carolina State Dept. of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources, Raleigh. Div. of Parks and Recreation. PUB DATE Oct 92 NOTE 96p.; For other Environmental Education Learning Experiences, see SE 054 364-371. AVAILABLE ,FROM North Carolina Division of Parks and Recreation, P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, NC 27611-7687. PUB TYPE Guides Classroom Use Teaching Guides (For Teacher)(052) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC04 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Classification; Computation; Ecology; Entomology; Environmental Education; Experiential Learning; Field Trips; Grade 5; Grade 6; Integrated Activities; Intermediate Grades; Maps; *Marine Biology; Natural Resources; *Outdoor Activities; *Outdoor Education; Teaching Guides; Water Pollution; *Water Quality; *Water Resources IDENTIFIERS Dichotomous Keys; Environmental. Management; *North Carolina; pH; Rivers; State Parks; Water Quality Analysis; Watersheds ABSTRACT This learning packet, one in a series of eight, was developed by the Eno River State Park in North Carolina for Grades 5-6 to teach about various aspects of water life on the Eno River. Loose -leaf pages are presented in nine sections that contain: (1) introductions to the North Carolina State Park System, the Eno River State Park, and to the park's activity packet;(2) a summary of the activities that includes major concepts and objectives covered; (3) pre-visit activities on map trivia and dichotomous classification keys;(4) on-site activities on river flow, pH values, water bugs and river sediment;(5) post-visit activities on water pollution; (6)a list ol7 69 related vocabulary words; (7) park and parental permission forms for the visit; and (8) blank pages for taking notes.
    [Show full text]
  • Eno River State Park Aquatic Inventory
    ENO RIVER STATE PARK AQUATIC INVENTORY by Gabriela B. Mottesi and Mara E. Savacool edited by John M. Alderman Cooperating Agencies: Division of Parks and Recreation, NC Natural Heritage Program NC Wildlife Resources Commission US Fish and Wildlife Service Funded by NC Natural Heritage Trust Fund NC Nongame and Endangered Wildlife Fund National Fish and Wildlife Foundation NORTH CAROLINA WILDLIFE RESOURCES COMMISSION JULY 1, 1996 145 9/2:A68e ENO RIVER STATE PARK AQUATIC INVENTORY Few's Ford tote Liters* of North Gamins' Raleigh MS tf/L £, 9 Table of Contents Page Introduction and Acknowledgments 1 Aquatic Snails 3 Freshwater Mussels and Sphaeriid Clams 10 Crayfish 1 Freshwater Fish 27 Point Sources and Animal Facilities 35 Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2017 with funding from State Library of North Carolina https://archive.org/details/enoriverstatepar1996mott Eno River State Park Aquatic Inventory Introduction Eno River State Park is located in Durham and Orange counties and encompasses 1,568 acres. The main attractions of this state park are the Eno River and its bordering woodlands. The park is divided into the following 5 areas through which the river can be accessed: the Cabe Lands, Cole Mill, Few’s Ford, Pleasant Green, and the Pump Station. Lands were initially purchased in 1975 by the State after concerned citizens led a campaign to prevent reservoir construction on the lower Eno River. Before the lands were purchased, they were used largely for agriculture. At that time, more than 30 mills were located on the Eno River. The Eno River, along with the Little and Flat Rivers, form the headwaters of the Neuse River, which is essentially our modern-day Falls Lake.
    [Show full text]
  • Eno River State Park EELE
    Eno River State Park An Environmental Education Learning Experience Designed for the Middle Grades ―Without life, there would still be water. Without water no life.” David Quammen, Natural Acts, A Sidelong View of Science and Nature This Environmental Education Learning Experience was developed by Scott Hartley and Martha Woods, former Park Rangers at Eno River State Park. Revised May 2013 by Brian Bockhahn, Jack Singley and Nathan Swick. North Carolina Division of Parks and Recreation Department of Environment and Natural Resources Other Contributors . Park volunteers; Association for the Preservation of the Eno River Valley, Inc.; Riffle and Pool Naturalists; The N.C. Department of Public Instruction; The N.C. Division of Water Resources; The N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources; and the many individuals and agencies who assisted in the review of this publication. 1. Introduction Introduction to the North Carolina State Parks System Introduction to Eno River State Park Introduction to the Activity Packet for Eno River State Park 2. Activity Summary Correlation Chart 2 3. Pre-Visit Activities # 1 Map Trivia # 2 The Key to Water Quality 4. On-Site Activities # 1 Go With The Flow # 2 Mind Your p’s and H’s # 3 Sediment: The “S” Word # 4 Water Bugs 5. Post-Visit Activities # 1 Fragile Waters # 2 Growing Water Bugs 1. Vocabulary 2. References 3. Forms Notes That was in 1915. The North Carolina State Parks System has now been established for nearly a century. What started out as one small plot of public land has grown into 67 properties across the state, Preserving and including parks, recreation areas, trails, rivers, lakes and natural protecting North Carolina’s natural resources is areas.
    [Show full text]
  • The North Carolina Booklet
    ! Vol. X OCTOBER, 1910 No. 2 'Ghe floRTH CflROIilNfl BoOKliET '^Carolina! Carolina! Heave^i' s blessings attend her While we live tve will cherish^ protect a7id defend her^ Published by THE NORTH CAROLINA SOCIETY DAUGHTERS OF THE REVOLUTION The object of the Booklet is to aid in developing and preserving North Carolina History. The proceeds arising from its publication will be de- voted to patriotic purposes. Editor. : : ADVISORY BOARD OF THE NORTH CAROLINA BOOKLET. Mrs. Hubert Haywood. Miss Martha Helen Haywood. Mr. E. E. Moffitt. Dr. Richard Dillard. Mrs. Spier Whitakee. Dr. Kemp P. Battle. Mr. R. D. W. Connor. Mr. James Sprunt. Dr. D. H. Hill. Mb. Marshall DeLancey Haywood. Dr. E. W. Sikes. Chief Justice Walter Clark. Mb, W. J. Peele. Major W. A. Graham. editor: Miss Mary Hilliard Hinton. OFFICERS OF THE NORTH CAROLINA SOCIETY DAUGHTERS OF THE REVOLUTION 1910-1912. regent: Miss Mx\RY HILLIARD HINTON. vice-regent : Miss CATHERINE FAUNTLEROY SEYTON ALBERTSON. honorary REGENTS: Mrs. SPIER WHITAKER. Mrs. E. E. MOFFITT. RECORDING SECRETARY: Mrs. J. LEIGH SKINNER. CORRESPONDING SECRETARY Mrs. PAUL H. LEE. TREASURER: Mrs. frank SHERWOOD. REGISTRAR Mrs. JOSEPH CHESHIRE WEBB. GENEALOGIST AND HISTORIAN: Mrs. HELEN DeBERNIERE WILLS. CUSTODIAN OF RELICS: Mrs. JOHN E. RAY. CHAPTER REGENTS. Bloomsbury Chapter Mrs. Hubert Haywood, Regent. Penelope Barker Chapter ]Mrs. Patrick Matthew, Regent. Sir Walter Raleigh Chapter Mrs. Walker Waller Joynes, Regent. DeGraffenried Chapter Mrs. Charles Slover Hollister, Regent. Founder of the North Carolina Society and Regent 1896-1902; Mrs. spier WHITAKER. Regent 1902: Mrs. D. H. HILL, Sr.* Regent 1902-1906: Mrs. THOMAS K. BRUNER. Regent 1906-1910: Mrs.
    [Show full text]
  • Urban Stormwater Management in Ellerbe Creek Watershed: the Duke Diet & Fitness Center Case Study
    Urban Stormwater Management in Ellerbe Creek Watershed: The Duke Diet & Fitness Center Case Study Report Prepared By: Jessie Allen & Nancy Scott Dr. Kenneth Reckhow, Advisor May, 2011 Masters project submitted in partial fulfillment of the Requirements for the Master of Environmental Management Degree in the Nicholas School of the Environment of Duke University 2011 ABSTRACT: Stormwater runoff from urban land has become a challenge for growing communities in managing non-point source pollution. The stormwater runoff of Downtown Durham, North Carolina is of particular interest, due to its location relative to the Falls Lake Reservoir. The purpose of this study is to use monitoring and modeling data to determine the best management of the Duke Diet and Fitness Center property, which drains 474 acres of urban land in Downtown Durham. Monitoring data was collected at this site for 9 storm events from July to October, 2010 and then analyzed for total nitrogen and phosphorus concentrations. The Jordan/Falls Lake Stormwater Accounting Tool and the Upper Neuse Site Evaluation Tool were used to determine nutrient loads and peak flow rate for 4 management scenarios using Best Management Practices (BMPs) in the drainage catchments. Based on these results, we give our recommendation for the construction of a wet pond at the site which will significantly reduce peak flow and nutrient loads from Downtown Durham. 2 Table of Contents Introduction ...............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Upper Neuse Clean Water Initiative Conservation Plan
    THE UPPER NEUSE CLEAN WATER INITIATIVE CONSERVATION PLAN Protecting Land and Drinking Water for the Future C ITY OF R ALEIGH C ONSERVATION T RUST FOR N ORTH C AROLINA E LLERBE C REEK W ATERSHED A SSOCIATION E NO R IVER A SSOCIATION N EUSE R IVER F OUNDATION TAR R IVER L AND C ONSERVANCY T RIANGLE G REENWAYS C OUNCIL T RIANGLE J COUNCIL OF G OVERNMENTS T RIANGLE L AND C ONSERVANCY T HE T RUST FOR P UBLIC L AND U PPER N EUSE R IVER B ASIN A SSOCIATION Written by Kelley Hart, The Trust for Public Land Designed and produced by Patrice Gallagher, Gallagher/Wood Design Copyright 2006 by the Trust for Public Land All rights reserved cover photo left The Conservation Trust for North Carolina cover photo center The Trust for Public Land (archives) cover photo right Upper Neuse River Basin Association THE UPPER NEUSE CLEAN WATER INITIATIVE CONSERVATION PLAN Protecting Land and Drinking Water for the Future This conservation plan and other efforts of the Upper Neuse Clean Water Initiative were generously funded by the CITY OF RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA. Table of Contents I NTRODUCTION 1 T HE U PPER N EUSE R IVER B ASIN TODAY AND TOMORROW 3 S TRESSES ON DRINKING WATER S UPPLIES 4 T HE R EGULATORY FABRIC 7 L AND C ONSERVATION AS A DRINKING WATER P ROTECTION S TRATEGY 9 Conservation Accomplishments and Efforts Underway 9 Advancing Land Conservation for Source Protection 10 Process 10 Results 12 G ETTING TO I MPLEMENTATION 14 Potential Sources of Local Funding 14 Potential Sources of State and Federal Funding 16 C ONCLUSION 17 A PPENDICES Appendix A: Current
    [Show full text]
  • Frequently Asked Questions
    November 2016 NC Mountains-to-Sea Trail through Orange County Frequently Asked Questions What is the NC Mountains-to-Sea Trail? The NC Mountains-to-Sea Trail (MST) is a 1,000-mile trail that will traverse the state from the Great Smoky Mountains in western North Carolina to Jockey’s Ridge State Park on the Outer Banks. Partners across the state are helping to plan and build the trail that will link communities and serve as the backbone of a growing system of land and water trails in North Carolina. In 2000 the NC General Assembly authorized the MST as a unit of the North Carolina Parks System. A map showing the Mountains-to-Sea State Trail across North Carolina is available at: http://www.orangecountync.gov/MST_statewide_map__0612_Status_.pdf How many miles of the NC Mountains-to-Sea Trail are finished? Over 600 miles of dedicated trail — well over half the planned length— has been completed to date and is open for hiking. A series of interim roadway connectors (bicycle routes and back roads) have been identified by the Friends of the Mountains-to-Sea Trail organization that knit together the completed sections of the MST across the state. Some examples of completed trail in this area include the following: • In Durham and Wake counties there are 77 miles of the trail along the Eno River and Falls Lake • Raleigh and Clayton completed a 33-mile Neuse River Greenway from Falls Lake Dam to Clayton • Alamance County has 15 miles of trail – including 8 miles from Glencoe to Town of Haw River • Hillsborough completed the 1.3-mile Riverwalk and Classical American Homes Preservation Trust extended the trail another 1.5 miles.
    [Show full text]
  • Inventory of Natural Areas and Wildlife Habitats for Orange County, North Carolina
    Inventory of Natural Areas and Wildlife Habitats for Orange County, North Carolina Dawson Sather and Stephen Hall (1988) Updated by Bruce Sorrie and Rich Shaw (2004) December 2004 Orange County Environment & Resource Conservation Department North Carolina Natural Heritage Program NC Natural Heritage Trust Fund Inventory of Natural Areas and Wildlife Habitats for Orange County, North Carolina Dawson Sather and Stephen Hall (1988) Updated by Bruce Sorrie and Rich Shaw (2004) December 2004 Orange County Environment & Resource Conservation Department North Carolina Natural Heritage Program Funded by Orange County, North Carolina NC Natural Heritage Trust Fund Prepared by Rich Shaw and Margaret Jones Orange County Environment and Resource Conservation Department Hillsborough, North Carolina For further information or to order copies of the inventory, please contact: Orange County ERCD P.O. Box 8181 Hillsborough, NC 27278 919/245-2590 or The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program 1601 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1601 www.ncnhp.org Table of Contents Page PREFACE....................................................................................................................................... i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS....................................................................................................... ii INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................................ 1 Information Sources............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Eno River Watershed Assessment Report
    Volume I Eno River Watershed Executive Summary Improvement Plan Durham, North Carolina December 2018 PREPARED FOR: City of Durham Public Works Department Stormwater & GIS Services Division 101 City Hall Plaza, Third Floor Durham, North Carolina 27701 This page left blank intentionally Eno River Watershed Improvement Plan City of Durham Stormwater & GIS Services Division Public Works Department 101 City Hall Plaza, Third Floor Durham, North Carolina 27701 This page left blank intentionally AECOM Acknowledgments The Eno River Watershed Improvement Plan represents the combined effort of staff from the City of Durham, AECOM, Kimley Horn and Associates, and Three Oaks Engineering. City of Durham Team Paul Wiebke, Assistant Director, Public Works Kelly Hartman Sandra Wilbur, Project Manager Dana Hornkohl Lance Fontaine, Assistant Project Manager J.V. Loperfido Jonathan Baker Don O’Toole Christine Cailleret Laura Smith Charlotte Dawn Megan Walsh Erin Harrison Michelle Woolfolk AECOM Team AECOM Technical Services of North Carolina Sujit Ekka, Project Manager Michelle Mayfield Brian Jacobson, Deputy Project Manager Karthik Narayanaswamy Matthew Burnette Alex Nice Diana Burke Hernan Rodriguez Brad Courtney Jason Sites Manasa Damera Zack Twigg Beth Kerby Cyndy Yu-Robinson Kimley-Horn and Associates Three Oaks Engineering Beth Reed Tom Dickinson Jason Hartshorn Nathan Howell Andrew Jones Kate Monteith Sevick Jennifer Murphy Chris Sheats This page left blank intentionally AECOM Table of Contents Acronyms and Abbreviations .......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Memorandum Outline
    Ellerbe Creek Green Infrastructure Partnership Technical Report A study presented by the Ellerbe Creek Green Infrastructure Partnership Ellerbe Creek Watershed Association Triangle J Council of Governments American Rivers City of Durham Stormwater Services NC Cooperative Extension Downtown Durham, Inc. April 25, 2014 Ellerbe Creek Green Infrastructure Partnership Technical Report A study presented by the Ellerbe Creek Green Infrastructure Partnership Authors: Chris Dreps, Ellerbe Creek Watershed Association Lars Hanson, Triangle J Council of Governments Peter Raabe, American Rivers Technical Reviewers: John Cox, Lance Fontaine, Sandra Wilbur, City of Durham Stormwater and GIS Services This project is made possible by funding through a US Environmental Protection Agency Urban Waters Grant Additional matching funds were provided by the following: City of Durham Stormwater Services American Rivers NC Cooperative Extension Ellerbe Creek Watershed Association 2 Ellerbe Creek Green Infrastructure Technical Report, April 2014 Contents 1. Introduction/Background ........................................................................................................................... 5 2. Technical Report ............................................................................................................................................. 6 3. Study Area .......................................................................................................................................................... 7 4. Analysis Methodologies ...............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Little River Corridor Open Space Plan
    Little River Corridor Open Space Plan Adopted by the: Durham Board of County Commissioners on August 27, 2001 Durham City Council on November 19, 2001 Little River Corridor Open Space Plan Page i Little River Corridor Open Space Plan Little River Corridor Open Space Plan Adopted by the: Durham Board of County Commissioners on August 27, 2001 Durham City Council on November 19, 2001 Page ii Little River Corridor Open Space Plan Preparation of the Little River Corridor Open Space Plan would not have been possible without the support of people who live in the Little River area and contributed to this plan. Many hours of volunteer effort in thinking and talking about Durham’s special places provided a sound basis for the Plan. Special thanks go to Edgar Johnson and the Little River Community Complex for the use of their fine facility for meetings. Also, special thanks go to the Eno River Association and the Triangle Land Conservancy for their support of the planning effort and of open space protection in Durham. Staff of the Durham City-County Planning Department who were primarily responsible for production of the Little River Corridor Open Space Plan include: Jane Korest, Senior Planner, Team Leader Keith Luck, Planning Supervisor Mike Giles, Open Space Manager Beth Timson, Senior Planner Teri Danner, Senior Planner Additional assistance provided by: Bonnie Estes, Planning Manager Steve Cruse, Senior Planner Sara Young, Senior Planner Helen Youngblood, Senior Planner (Cover photo is of the North Fork of the Little River at South Lowell Road by Korest) Page iii Little River Corridor Open Space Plan Table of Contents I.
    [Show full text]