A Brief Overview of Oral Potentially Malignant Disorder
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
British Journal of Medicine & Medical Research 6(1): 48-55, 2015, Article no.BJMMR.2015.183 ISSN: 2231-0614 SCIENCEDOMAIN international www.sciencedomain.org A Brief Overview of Oral Potentially Malignant Disorder Y. Saleh Nasser Azzeghaib1* 1Department of Oral Maxillofacial Sciences, Alfarabi College of Dentistry and Nursing, Saudi Arabia. Author’s contribution The sole author designed, analyzed and interpreted and prepared the manuscript. Article Information DOI: 10.9734/BJMMR/2015/11491 Editor(s): (1) Li (Peter) Mei, Faculty of Dentistry, Discipline of Orthodontics, University of Otago, New Zealand. (2) Philippe E. Spiess, Department of Genitourinary Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, USA and Department of Urology and Department of Oncologic Sciences (Joint Appointment), College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA. Reviewers: (1) Anonymous, Department of Oral Pathology, SMBT dental college & Hospital, Sangamner, Maharashtra, India. (2) Micha Cyrus, Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery and Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology School of Dental Sciences, University of Nairobi, Kenya. (3) Anonymous, University of Malaya, Malaysia. (4) Anonymous, JSS Dental College and Hospital, JSS University, Mysore, Karnataka, India. (5) Anonymous, Rajasthan Dental College and Hospital, Jaipur, India. Complete Peer review History: http://www.sciencedomain.org/review-history.php?iid=720&id=12&aid=7230 Received 18th May 2014 st Review Article Accepted 31 October 2014 Published 15th December 2014 ABSTRACT Cancer of the oral cavity is one of the most common cancers. Oral cancer is still only detectable at a late stage, and the survival rate for an oral cancer patient has essentially remained unchanged over the past three decades. This study is concentrated on the oral precancerous lesions which are commonly seen in dental clinics and to give the general practitioners Knowledge for early detection of these lesions. A literature search was conducted using Medline, accessed via the National Library of Medicine PubMed interface, searching for articles relating to the precancerous oral lesions written in English. Keywords: Precancerous lesion (potentially malignant disorder); oral lesion; malignant transformation. 1. INTRODUCTION part of the throat). Symptoms may include red, white and/or speckled spots and patches in the Oral cancer may develop in any part of the mouth, swellings, lumps and rough crusts areas mouth, tongue, lips and the oropharynx (middle anywhere inside the mouth, unexplained _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ *Corresponding author: Email: [email protected]; Azzeghaibi; BJMMR, 6(1): 48-55, 2015; Article no.BJMMR.2015.183 bleeding, pain, tenderness or numbness in the quid chewing commonly leads to precancerous mouth, difficulty in swallowing, speaking or condition known as oral submucous fibrosis chewing, hoarseness of voice, ear pain and which has a malignant transformation rate of dramatic loss in weight [1,2]. 7.6% 12). Prabhu and Wilson stated that Human papilloma virus (HPV) may also be associated The term Potentially Malignant Disorder has with some oral and oropharyngeal cancers [13]. been introduced in 2005 after the WHO meeting HPV-18 has been found in up to 14 percent of to be used instead of pre-malignant lesions and cases and HPV-16 has been detected in up to 22 conditions, they also suggested that leukoplakia percent of oral cancers [14-15]. The low intake of and erythroplakia have the highest malignant fruits and vegetables in the diet may also transformation behaviour and attention must be eventually attribute to an increased risk for given to them more than the other lesions. cancer [16] Radoï et al. [17] reported that hot Precancerous lesions and early oral cancers are beverages tea and coffeein particular drinking often subtle and asymptomatic. Therefore, it is may decrease the risk of oral cancer through important for the clinician to have suspicion, antioxidant components which play a role in the especially if risk factors such as tobacco use or reparations of cellular damages. Jaleel et al. [18] alcohol abuse is present [23]. Early detection and reported that people with the blood group A had diagnosis is very important issue and have direct a 10.46% likelihood to develop oral cancer relation in the treatment and prognosis of the oral compared to people of other blood groups. cancer. Plummer-Vinson or Paterson-Kelly syndrome which is an iron deficiency anemia in 2. RISK FACTORS combination with dysphagia and esophageal web is associated with an increased risk for Smokers are 5 to 9 times more likely to develop development of carcinoma of the oral cavity, oral cancer in comparison to nonsmokers, and particularly oropharynx and oesophagus [19]. for heavy smokers who smoke 80 or more cigarettes daily, the risk is 17 times greater [3-4]. 3. DIAGNOSIS OF PRE MALIGNANT Souto et al. [5] reported that the mean LESION (POTENTIALLY MALIGNANT percentage of aneuploid nuclei was statistically DISORDER) higher in the smokers with oral squamous cell carcinoma (93.65%), as compared to non- Pre-malignant lesion often presents itself as smokers (39.3%) (P<0.05). Souto et al. [5] either white or red patches in oral mucosa known concluded in his study that tobacco use is as leukoplakia or erythroplakia [20-23]. The responsible for an increased number of patient may initially notice the presence of a non- aneuploid nuclei in the oral epithelium. Bouquot healing ulcer when the cancer develops. Later- and Meckstroth [6] reported that West Virginia is stage symptoms may include loosening of teeth, the state with the highest per capita consumption bleeding, dysphagia, difficulty in wearing of smokeless tobacco, yet it has less dentures, and development of a neck mass. For oral/pharyngeal cancer than the US average visual examination and palpation, it is Madani et al. [7] indicated that gutkha, supari - recommended that a tongue blade or dental areca nut- chewing tobacco (tobacco flakes), bidi mirror and a gloved hand can be used to retract smoking and mishiri (tobacco powder, which the lips and extend the cheeks. To assist with applied as a tooth and gum cleaner) are retraction and examination of the lateral borders independent risk for oral cancer. The use of of the tongue gauze can be used for wrapping smokeless tobacco appears to be associated the tongue. Pre-malignant lesions are most with a much lower cancer risk than that commonly found in the lateral borders of the associated with smoked tobacco [8,9]. Andre et tongue, the floor of the mouth, the posterior al. [10] reported that the heavy drinkers are 30 aspect of the cheek, and the oropharynx. It is times more likely to develop oral and recommended by the American Cancer Society oropharyngeal cancer in comparison to non- that an annual check-up for all individuals aged drinkers [10]. A synergistic effect of alcohol and 40 and older, and every three years for those smoking was observed by some authors. Risk of between the ages of 20 and 39 [24-25] is done. developing malignancy in patients who are both heavy smokers and drinkers is over one hundred It is also recommended by the society to improve times [10-11]. Another habit which has been the oral cancer survival rate, by educating strongly associated with increased risk for oral individuals via oral sessions and new ways of cancer is the chronic use of betel quid [12]. Betel awareness (Word Choice: In most cases 49 Azzeghaibi; BJMMR, 6(1): 48-55, 2015; Article no.BJMMR.2015.183 advertisement or advertising usually refers to a very thick and opaque), speckled Fig. 3 (less product or services) to encourage patients to common; non-homogenous / heterogenous reduce (Word Choice) the risk of contracting oral leukoplakias has a high risk of malignant cancer. transformation) and verrucous [29]. Proliferative verrucous leukoplakia (Fig. 4) begins with 4. LEUKOPLAKIA conventional flat white patches that, over time, they tend to become much thicker and papillary Oral leukoplakia (OL) is a white patch or plaque in nature and may progress to verrucous that cannot be rubbed off and cannot be carcinoma. The condition is often seen in characterized clinically or histologically as any patients without any risk factors, characterized by other condition [26]. Leukoplakia has no widespread, multifocal sites of involvement and histologic connotation and should never be used has a high recurrence rate [30]. A study of 3,300 as a microscopic diagnosis. biopsies of oral leukoplakia by waldron and shafer showed that 19.9% of all leukoplakia When evaluating a patient suspected to have a showed some degree of epithelial dysplasia [31]. leukoplakia, a rough clinical diagnosis must be Dysplasia is more commonly seen in thicker done to exclude leukoplakia, for example any leukoplakia; therefore, a verrucous leukoplakia is oral white patch can be diagnosed as a the most likely to show dysplastic changes leukoplakia until it is proved that it is other compared to other forms [32]. Speckled condition (lichen planus, leukoedema).Oral white leukoplakia or erythroplakia (leukoplakias red patches can easily develop due to local irritation. component) is at greatest risk for showing For example ,the thickened hyperkeratotic areas dysplasia or carcinoma [32]. on the alveolar ridges of the edentulous patients, especially in patients who do not wear a dental prosthesis (Fig. 1). This hyperkeratotic area is due to the epithelium protecting the area which is preferably termed