Now and in the Future
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Direct Line Group Case Study
Customer Service Solutions Case Study Live chat and mobile chat Direct Line Group Direct Line Group eases insurance- buying process. Creating interactions that reflect their brand’s goals to make buying easier and efficient. Challenge Solutions Results – Make the buying process – Live chat implemented with – 55% of customers list Web easier Nuance best practices and chat as their channel of choice – Provide creative, effective product-trained agents – 30% of customers would customer assistance on – Mobile chat added to have done business elsewhere mobile devices mobile delivery solution to without chat – Increase conversions and proactively and efficiently – 50% cost-to-serve reduction, reduce abandonment rate assist customers whenever, compared to telephony – Proactively engage with new wherever, and however they – CSAT is 98%, NPS is at customers via the mobile choose 65% - higher than any other channel channel, including self-serve Direct Line Group is one of the leading motor, home and small business insurers in the UK, and home to some of the nation’s favorite brands, including Direct Line, Churchill, Privilege, Green Flag, and NIG. Their mission is to make insurance much easier and a better value for their customers, which is why they pursued a customer engagement strategy that attained to their ambition of working more creatively and effectively. Customer Service Solutions Case Study Live chat and mobile chat Direct Line Group The challenge who is trained in Direct Line Group products and Nuance Part of easing the insurance-buying process was not live chat best practices is what makes Direct Line’s only in simplifying navigation and providing live chat customer experience so efficient. -
Alliance Trust Portfolio
Alliance Trust Portfolio University of St Andrews Month Ending 31/07/2013 No Of Equity Description Shares ALEXION PHARMACEUTICALS INC 10,900 AMAZON.COM 4,500 AMER INTERNATIONAL GROUP 21,514 AMGEN INC 9,600 ANGIE'S LIST 22,900 ANHEUSER-BUSCH INBEV 6,876 ARM HOLDINGS PLC 77,323 BANCA GENERALI SPA 35,206 BANGKOK BANK 122,600 BG GROUP 45,404 BORG WARNER INC 11,300 BROOKDALE SENIOR LIVING 24,370 CHECK POINT SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIES LTD 17,200 CITIGROUP INC 20,650 CLEAN HARBORS INC 18,200 COMPUTERSHARE LTD 87,337 CONTINENTAL AG 4,935 CSL LTD 11,335 DENTSU INC 42,100 DNB ASA 50,402 ECOLAB INC 16,206 EMC CORP 49,000 ENN ENERGY HOLDINGS LTD 138,000 EQUINIX INC 5,300 ESSILOR INTERNATIONAL 7,186 FAST RETAILING CO LTD 2,100 GOOGLE INC CL'A' 1,600 KENMARE RESOURCES PLC 1,071,478 MACY'S 20,061 MILLICOM 8,604 MITSUI FUDOSAN CO LTD 26,979 NOVATEK 4,660 NOVO NORDISK A/S 6,724 OIL SEARCH LTD 175,993 OMNICOM GROUP INC 12,200 PNC FINANCIAL SERVICES INC 12,786 PRAXAIR INC 13,287 PRUDENTIAL PLC 41,841 RENEWABLES INFRASTRUCTURE GROUP LTD 357,100 ROCHE HOLDING AG 5,037 ROCKWELL AUTOMATION INC 10,100 ROPER TECHNOLOGIES INC 10,700 SPX CORPORATION 7,200 STARWOOD HOTELS & RESORTS WORLDWIDE 14,100 TERADATA 11,800 TRACTOR SUPPLY COMPANY 6,944 TRIMBLE NAVIGATION 21,000 UNILEVER PLC 25,446 VARIAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS 14,094 VISA INC 5,800 W. W. GRAINGER INC 4,643 WATERS CORP 11,300 Buckley Muething Portfolio University of St Andrews Month Ending 31/07/2013 No Of Fund Description Shares Value Bonds ALPHA NATURAL RESOURCES INC 100,000 ARCH COAL INC 100,000 BEAZER HOMES USA INC -
Parker Review
Ethnic Diversity Enriching Business Leadership An update report from The Parker Review Sir John Parker The Parker Review Committee 5 February 2020 Principal Sponsor Members of the Steering Committee Chair: Sir John Parker GBE, FREng Co-Chair: David Tyler Contents Members: Dr Doyin Atewologun Sanjay Bhandari Helen Mahy CBE Foreword by Sir John Parker 2 Sir Kenneth Olisa OBE Foreword by the Secretary of State 6 Trevor Phillips OBE Message from EY 8 Tom Shropshire Vision and Mission Statement 10 Yvonne Thompson CBE Professor Susan Vinnicombe CBE Current Profile of FTSE 350 Boards 14 Matthew Percival FRC/Cranfield Research on Ethnic Diversity Reporting 36 Arun Batra OBE Parker Review Recommendations 58 Bilal Raja Kirstie Wright Company Success Stories 62 Closing Word from Sir Jon Thompson 65 Observers Biographies 66 Sanu de Lima, Itiola Durojaiye, Katie Leinweber Appendix — The Directors’ Resource Toolkit 72 Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy Thanks to our contributors during the year and to this report Oliver Cover Alex Diggins Neil Golborne Orla Pettigrew Sonam Patel Zaheer Ahmad MBE Rachel Sadka Simon Feeke Key advisors and contributors to this report: Simon Manterfield Dr Manjari Prashar Dr Fatima Tresh Latika Shah ® At the heart of our success lies the performance 2. Recognising the changes and growing talent of our many great companies, many of them listed pool of ethnically diverse candidates in our in the FTSE 100 and FTSE 250. There is no doubt home and overseas markets which will influence that one reason we have been able to punch recruitment patterns for years to come above our weight as a medium-sized country is the talent and inventiveness of our business leaders Whilst we have made great strides in bringing and our skilled people. -
Capital Analytics UK Registrars Benchmarking Survey 2009
Capital Analytics UK Registrars Benchmarking Survey 2009 CAPITAL ANALYTICS UK REGISTRARS BENCHMARKING SURVEY 2009 September 2009 © Copyright, 2009 Capital Analytics Limited. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means without permission from Capital Analytics Limited. No advertising or other promotional use can be made of the information in this report without the express prior written consent of Capital Analytics Limited. Capital Analytics UK Registrars Benchmarking Survey 2009 CONTENTS SURVEY PURPOSE AND METHODOLOGY ................................................................................... 4 Purpose ................................................................................................................................................ 4 Methodology ........................................................................................................................................ 4 COMPANY SATISFACTION INDEX 2009 ........................................................................................ 6 INDUSTRY ANNUAL OVERALL COMPARISON 2005 - 2009 ...................................................... 7 OVERALL SATISFACTION WITH SERVICES .............................................................................. 8 Comments on Overall Satisfaction with Services ................................................................................ 8 Overall Satisfaction with Registrar .................................................................................................. -
Finn-Ancial Times Finncap Financials & Insurance Quarterly Sector Note
finn-ancial Times finnCap Financials & Insurance quarterly sector note Q3 2020 | Issue 9 Highlights this quarter: Elevated uncertainty and volatility have been hallmarks of the last 18 months, with Brexit, the UK General Election and more recently COVID-19 all contributing to the challenges that face investors wishing to carve out solid and stable returns amid these ‘unprecedented’ times. With this is mind, and simulating finnCap’s proven Slide Rule methodology, we found the highest quality and lowest value stocks across the financials space, assessing how the make-up of these lists changed over the period January 2019 to July 2020, tracking indexed share price performance over the period as well as movements in P/E and EV/EBIT valuations. The top quartile list of Quality companies outperformed both the Value list and the FTSE All Share by rising +2.5% over the period versus -5.4% for the All Share and -14.3% for Value stocks. Furthermore, the Quality list had protection on the downside in the market crash between February and March 2020, and accelerated faster amid the market rally between late March and July 2020. From high to low (January to March), Quality moved -36.3% against the Value list at -45.5%, while a move off the lows to July was +37.4% for Quality and +34.0% for Value. There was some crossover between the Quality and Value lists, with 7 companies of the top quartile (16 companies in total) appearing in both the Quality and Value lists. This meant that a) investors could capture what we call ‘Quality at Value’ (i.e. -
Close Brothers Group Plc (Incorporated with Limited Liability in England and Wales with Registered Number 00520241)
PROSPECTUS DATED 8 JUNE 2021 Close Brothers Group plc (incorporated with limited liability in England and Wales with registered number 00520241) £200,000,000 2.00% Subordinated Tier 2 Notes Issue price: 99.531 per cent. The £200,000,000 2.00% Subordinated Tier 2 Notes (the “Notes”) will be issued by Close Brothers Group plc (the “Issuer”) on or about 11 June 2021 (the “Issue Date”). The terms and conditions of the Notes are set out herein in “Terms and Conditions of the Notes” below (the “Conditions”, and references to a numbered “Condition” shall be construed accordingly). The Notes will bear interest on their outstanding principal amount from (and including) the Issue Date to (but excluding) 11 September 2026 (the “Reset Date”), at a rate of 2.00 per cent. per annum and thereafter at the Reset Interest Rate as provided in Condition 5. Interest will be payable on the Notes semi-annually in arrear on each Interest Payment Date, commencing on 11 September 2021 (with a short first Interest Period from (and including) the Issue Date to (but excluding) 11 September 2021). Unless previously redeemed or purchased and cancelled, or (pursuant to Condition 7(f)) substituted, the Notes will mature on 11 September 2031 and shall be redeemed at their principal amount, together with any accrued and unpaid interest on such date. The Noteholders will have no right to require the Issuer to redeem or purchase the Notes at any time. The Issuer may, in its discretion but subject to Regulatory Approval, elect to (a) redeem all (but not some only) of the -
Rating Action, Barclays Bank UK
Rating Action: Moody's takes rating actions on Barclays, Lloyds, Santander UK, Nationwide and Close Brothers, following update to banks methodology 13 Jul 2021 London, 13 July 2021 -- Moody's Investors Service (Moody's) has today taken rating actions on Barclays, Lloyds, Santander UK and Close Brothers banking groups and on Nationwide Building Society, including the upgrade of the long-term senior ratings of Lloyds Banking Group plc and Close Brothers Group plc. The rating actions were driven by revisions to Moody's Advanced Loss Given Failure (Advanced LGF) framework, which is applied to banks operating in jurisdictions with Operational Resolution Regimes, following the publication of Moody's updated Banks Methodology on 9 July 2021. This methodology is available at this link: https://www.moodys.com/researchdocumentcontentpage.aspx?docid=PBC_1269625 . A full list of affected ratings and assessments can be found at the end of this Press Release. RATINGS RATIONALE Today's rating actions were driven by revisions to the Advanced Loss Given Failure framework within Moody's updated Banks Methodology: a revised notching guidance table, with thresholds at lower levels of subordination and volume in the liability structure have been applied to the UK banks and Additional Tier 1 (AT1) securities issued by banks domiciled in the UK have been included in the Advanced LGF framework, eliminating the previous analytical distinction between those high trigger instruments that were deemed to provide equity-like absorption of losses before the point of failure and other AT1 securities. Moody's removal of equity credit for high trigger Additional Tier 1 (AT1) instruments from banks' going concern capital means that affected banks have reduced capacity to absorb unexpected losses before the point of failure, everything else being equal. -
Summary of Investments by Type
COMMON INVESTMENT FUNDS Schedule of Investments September 30, 2017 SUMMARY OF INVESTMENTS BY TYPE Cost Market Value Fixed Income Investments $ $ Short-term investments 27,855,310 27,855,310 Bonds 173,219,241 174,637,768 Mortgage-backed securities 29,167,382 28,915,537 Emerging markets debt 9,619,817 11,462,971 Bank loans - high income fund 23,871,833 23,908,105 Total Fixed Income Investments 263,733,583 266,779,691 Equity-Type Investments Mutual funds Domestic 9,284,694 13,089,028 International 18,849,681 21,226,647 Common stocks Domestic 149,981,978 192,057,988 International 225,506,795 259,856,181 Total Equity-Type Investments 403,623,148 486,229,844 Alternative Investments Funds of hedge funds 38,264,990 46,646,700 Real estate trust fund 6,945,440 10,204,969 Total Alternatives Investments 45,210,430 56,851,669 TOTAL INVESTMENTS 712,567,160 809,861,204 Page 1 of 34 COMMON INVESTMENT FUNDS Schedule of Investments September 30, 2017 SUMMARY OF INVESTMENTS BY FUND Cost Market Value Fixed Income Fund $ $ Short-term investments 6,967,313 6,967,313 Bonds 140,024,544 141,525,710 Mortgage-backed securities 27,878,101 27,642,277 Emerging markets debt 9,619,817 11,462,971 Bank loans - high income fund 23,871,833 23,908,105 208,361,608 211,506,377 Domestic Core Equity Fund Short-term investments 4,856,385 4,856,385 Common stocks 131,222,585 167,989,561 Futures - 19,895 Private placement 4,150 4,150 136,083,120 172,869,991 Small Cap Equity Fund Short-term investments 2,123,629 2,123,629 Mutual funds 9,284,694 13,089,028 Common stocks 18,755,243 -
Download Report
- † † Met target 3% On track Not on track 10% No data 45% 42% Increased Maintained 15% Decreased 14% 72% Targeted increase 23% 38% 31% 29% 2017 2018 Target • • • • • • • • • • • Met On target track On track 45% 4% 42% Not on track Above 18% No data Below 42% Not 58% on 78% track No 10% data 3% Insurance (20) 15 1 4 Global/investment banking (18) 15 1 2 UK banking (16) 14 1 1 Other* (14) 7 3 4 Professional services (12) 6 5 1 Investment management (11) 10 1 Building society/credit union (10) 5 3 2 Increased Fintech (9) 7 2 Maintained Government/regulator/trade 5 1 1 body (7) Decreased 47% Building society/credit union (10) 53% Government/regulator/trade body 44% (9) 51% 44% Other* (14) 46% 44% Professional services (15) 44% 36% Fintech (9) 42% 34% Average (123) 38% 30% UK banking (17) 34% 31% Insurance (20) 33% 26% Investment management (11) 30% 2017 22% Global/investment banking (18) 25% 2018 100% 90% Nearly two-thirds of signatories have a target of at least 33% 80% 70% 60% Above 50% 50% Parity (3) 40% 50:50 40% up to 30% 33% up to 50% 30% (31) 20% Up to 40% 30% (24) 10% (30) (23) (10) 0% 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% Government/regulator/trade 41% body (5) 47% Fintech (4) 37% 48% Insurance (16) 32% 40% Professional services (5) 32% 38% UK banking (11) 32% 41% Building society/credit union 31% (2) 36% Average (67) 31% 38% Other* (4) 29% 35% Investment management (5) 27% 2018 33% Target Global/investment banking 25% (15) 29% Firms that have met or 47% exceeded their targets (54) 40% 31% 28% 15% 15% 11% % of firms % of 43 29 26 20 5 Number of -
Fiscal Quarter-End Holdings (Pdf)
Quarterly Schedules of Portfolio Holdings International & Global Funds July 31, 2020 Retirement Institutional Administrative Investor Class Class Class Class Harbor Diversified International All Cap Fund HNIDX HAIDX HRIDX HIIDX Harbor Emerging Markets Equity Fund HNEMX HAEMX HREMX HIEEX Harbor Focused International Fund HNFRX HNFSX HNFDX HNFIX Harbor Global Leaders Fund HNGIX HGGAX HRGAX HGGIX Harbor International Fund HNINX HAINX HRINX HIINX Harbor International Growth Fund HNGFX HAIGX HRIGX HIIGX Harbor International Small Cap Fund HNISX HAISX HRISX HIISX Harbor Overseas Fund HAORX HAOSX HAOAX HAONX Table of Contents Portfolios of Investments HARBOR DIVERSIFIED INTERNATIONAL ALL CAP FUND. ..... 1 HARBOR EMERGING MARKETS EQUITY FUND . .......... 8 HARBOR FOCUSED INTERNATIONAL FUND. ................................. 11 HARBOR GLOBAL LEADERS FUND. ................. 13 HARBOR INTERNATIONAL FUND . 15 HARBOR INTERNATIONAL GROWTH FUND . ........................ 21 HARBOR INTERNATIONAL SMALL CAP FUND. ................. 24 HARBOR OVERSEAS FUND . ............................................ 26 Notes to Portfolios of Investments ..................................... 31 Harbor Diversified International All Cap Fund PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS—July 31, 2020 (Unaudited) Value, Cost, and Principal Amounts in Thousands COMMON STOCKS—96.4% COMMON STOCKS—Continued Shares Value Shares Value AEROSPACE & DEFENSE—0.7% BANKS—Continued 28,553 Airbus SE (France)* .............................. $ 2,090 236,142 Svenska Handelsbanken AB (Sweden) ............... $ -
Membership List
Membership List Private Sector 3M Hutchison Whampoa Europe Addleshaw Goddard LLP IBM Aggregate Industries International Airlines Group Airbus Jacobs Amazon Web Services John Lewis Partnership Anglian Water Group Kingfisher Anglo American Kingsley Napley Arcadis Korn Ferry Arup KPMG Associated British Foods Kuehne + Nagel Atkins Leonardo Atos Linklaters Aviva plc Lloyds Banking Group AWE plc London City Airport Babcock International Group plc LV= BAE Systems Mace Group Bakkavor Marks & Spencer Barclays Maximus BHP Microsoft Boeing Mizuho Bank BP Nationwide Building Society British American Tobacco NATS Browne Jacobson Nestle UK BT Group Northgate Public Service Bupa Novartis Capita Group Oracle Carlyle Group PA Consulting CEMEX UK Prudential CGI PwC Cisco QinetiQ Citi RELX Group Clifford Chance Rio Tinto Clyde & Co Rolls-Royce Co-operative Group The Royal Bank of Scotland Group Cushman & Wakefield Royal Mail Deloitte Sainsbury’s Dentons Santander UK DHL SAP UK Direct Line Group Savills Drax Group Serco Group Equifax Shell International Equinor Skanska Eversheds Sutherland Slaughter and May Eversholt Rail Standard Life Aberdeen plc ExxonMobil Sopra Steria EY St James’s Place Wealth Management Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer Tarmac FTI Consulting Tata Fujitsu Services Tesco plc Gallagher Total Gemserv Unipart GlaxoSmithKline United Utilities plc Grant Thornton Virgin Care Gowling WLG UK LLP Womble Bond Dickinson Heathrow Airport Holdings WSP Herbert Smith Freehills LLP Xerox HSBC Holdings Huawei Technologies UK Hutchison Whampoa Europe The Whitehall & Industry Group (WIG) 80 Petty France, London, SW1H 9EX T: 020 7222 1166 E: [email protected] F: 020 7222 1167 www.wig.co.uk Charitable Company Limited by Guarantee Registered No. 3340252 Charity No. -
Annual Report & Accounts 2017
Annual Report & Accounts 2017 Direct Line Insurance Group plc Annual Report & Accounts 2017 A year of strong progress Contents Paul Geddes, CEO of Direct Line Group, commented: “2017 is the fifth successive year in which we have Strategic report delivered a strong financial performance. We have 1 Group highlights seen significant growth in our direct own brand policies 2 Our investment case as more customers respond positively to the many 4 Group at a glance improvements we have made to the business. This 6 Business model success has resulted in our proposing an increase in the final dividend by 40.2% to 13.6 pence, bringing the 8 Chairman’s statement total ordinary dividend to 20.4 pence and declaring a 10 Chief Executive Officer’s review special dividend of 15.0 pence. This amounts to a cash 12 Market overview return of £486 million to shareholders. 14 Our strategy 20 Our key performance indicators “At half year we refreshed our medium-term targets 22 Risk management and our results show we’ve been delivering on our 26 Corporate social responsibility management priorities to maintain revenue growth, 30 Operating review reduce expense and commission ratios and deliver 34 Finance review underwriting and pricing excellence. Governance “Looking to the future, this success enables us to continue investing in our technology and customer experience, 44 Chairman’s introduction supporting our plans to grow the business whilst 46 Board of Directors improving efficiency. Together with our track record of 48 Executive Committee delivery, these give