DOCSLIB.ORG

Final Environmental Impact Statement Volume I Norbeck

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Final Environmental Impact Statement Volume I Norbeck United States Department of Agriculture Forest Final Environmental Service Impact Statement Volume I March 2010 Norbeck Wildlife Project Hell Canyon Ranger District, Black Hills National Forest Custer and Pennington Counties, South Dakota The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410, or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720- 6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Norbeck Wildlife Project Final Environmental Impact Statement Norbeck Wildlife Project Final Environmental Impact Statement Custer and Pennington Counties, South Dakota Lead Agency: USDA Forest Service, Black Hills National Forest Cooperating Agencies: South Dakota Department of Game, Fish and Parks Responsible Official: Lynn Kolund, District Ranger Hell Canyon Ranger District 330 Mt. Rushmore Rd. Custer, SD 57730 For Information Contact: Kelly Honors, Team Leader 330 Mt. Rushmore Rd Custer, SD 57730 605-673-4853 Abstract The Hell Canyon Ranger District of the Black Hills National Forest has prepared a Final Environmental Impact Statement in compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act and other relevant Federal and State laws and regulations. The Hell Canyon District proposes to improve habitat for game animals and birds within the Norbeck Wildlife Preserve and to reduce the risks and consequences of a fire escaping from the Black Elk Wilderness, as guided by the Black Hills National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan (Forest Plan) as amended. Mechanical and prescribed burning treatments are proposed to enhance forage, meadows, hardwood stands, shrubs, large trees, late succession and within stand diversity in that portion of Norbeck outside of the Black Elk Wilderness. Four alternatives were considered in detail. Alternative 1 is the no Action Alternative; no management actions associated with this project would occur. Alternative 2 is the proposed action and includes a total of 6,001 acres of habitat enhancement treatments. Alternative 3 was developed in response to 4 of the 5 significant issues identified through scoping and includes habitat enhancement treatments on a total of 5,652 acres, outside of the Black Elk Wilderness. In addition, Alternative 3 proposes to prescribe burn 5,291 acres within the Black Elk Wilderness. Alternative 4 was developed in response to all 5 significant issues identified through scoping. Alternative 4 would implement habitat enhancement treatments on 6,119 acres outside of the Black Elk Wilderness and would prescribe burn on up to 5,291 acres within the Wilderness. Norbeck Wildlife Project Final Environmental Impact Statement Table of Contents Abstract_____________________________________________________________________ iii Summary __________________________________________________________________ - 1 - Chapter 1. Purpose of and Need for Action _________________________________________ 1 Document Structure ________________________________________________________________ 1 Background _______________________________________________________________________ 1 Management Direction ______________________________________________________________ 3 Forest Service Direction on Management of Fire in Wilderness _____________________________________ 4 Purpose and Need for Action _________________________________________________________ 5 Proposed Action ___________________________________________________________________ 6 Decision Framework ________________________________________________________________ 7 Public Involvement _________________________________________________________________ 7 Issues ____________________________________________________________________________ 8 Chapter 2. Alternatives _______________________________________________________ 11 Introduction _____________________________________________________________________ 11 Alternatives Considered in Detail ____________________________________________________ 11 Alternative 1 – No Action __________________________________________________________________ 11 Alternative 2 - Proposed Action _____________________________________________________________ 11 Alternative 3 ____________________________________________________________________________ 17 Alternative 4 ____________________________________________________________________________ 23 Alternatives Considered but Eliminated from Detailed Study ______________________________ 27 Monitoring ______________________________________________________________________ 29 Comparison of Alternatives _________________________________________________________ 30 Chapter 3. Affected Environment and Environmental Consequences ___________________ 39 Introduction _____________________________________________________________________ 39 Past, Present and Reasonably Foreseeable Actions ______________________________________ 39 Wildlife Habitat ___________________________________________________________________ 40 Existing Conditions _______________________________________________________________________ 40 Environmental Consequences _______________________________________________________________ 46 Alternative 1 – No Action __________________________________________________________________ 47 Alternative 2 ____________________________________________________________________________ 52 Alternative 3 ____________________________________________________________________________ 59 Alternative 4 ____________________________________________________________________________ 66 Wildlife _________________________________________________________________________ 76 Focus Species ____________________________________________________________________________ 77 Management Indicator Species (MIS) ________________________________________________________ 112 Species of Local Concern (SOLC) ____________________________________________________________ 124 Threatened, Endangered and R2 Sensitive Species _____________________________________________ 161 Norbeck Wildlife Project Final Environmental Impact Statement Raptors ________________________________________________________________________________ 163 Migratory Birds __________________________________________________________________________ 164 Silviculture _____________________________________________________________________ 166 Alternative 1 – No Action __________________________________________________________________ 166 Common to All Alternatives ________________________________________________________________ 166 Alternative 2 ____________________________________________________________________________ 166 Alternative 3 ____________________________________________________________________________ 167 Alternative 4 ____________________________________________________________________________ 167 Black Elk Wilderness _____________________________________________________________ 169 Existing Condition ________________________________________________________________________ 169 Environmental Consequences ______________________________________________________________ 171 Fire and Fuels ___________________________________________________________________ 174 Existing Conditions _______________________________________________________________________ 174 Environmental Consequences ______________________________________________________________ 183 Soils and Hydrology ______________________________________________________________ 201 Soils ___________________________________________________________________________________ 201 Hydrology ______________________________________________________________________________ 208 Scenery ________________________________________________________________________ 218 Existing Conditions _______________________________________________________________________ 218 Environmental Consequences ______________________________________________________________ 219 Recreation _____________________________________________________________________ 228 Existing Conditions _______________________________________________________________________ 228 Environmental Consequences ______________________________________________________________ 233 Range, Noxious Weeds and Botany _________________________________________________ 237 Existing Condition ________________________________________________________________________ 237 Environmental Consequences ______________________________________________________________ 241 Heritage Resources ______________________________________________________________ 251 Existing Conditions _______________________________________________________________________ 251 Environmental Consequences ______________________________________________________________ 254 Transportation __________________________________________________________________ 255 Existing Condition ________________________________________________________________________
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Outline of United States Federal Indian Law and Policy
    Outline of United States federal Indian law and policy The following outline is provided as an overview of and topical guide to United States federal Indian law and policy: Federal Indian policy – establishes the relationship between the United States Government and the Indian Tribes within its borders. The Constitution gives the federal government primary responsibility for dealing with tribes. Law and U.S. public policy related to Native Americans have evolved continuously since the founding of the United States. David R. Wrone argues that the failure of the treaty system was because of the inability of an individualistic, democratic society to recognize group rights or the value of an organic, corporatist culture represented by the tribes.[1] U.S. Supreme Court cases List of United States Supreme Court cases involving Indian tribes Citizenship Adoption Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians v. Holyfield, 490 U.S. 30 (1989) Adoptive Couple v. Baby Girl, 530 U.S. _ (2013) Tribal Ex parte Joins, 191 U.S. 93 (1903) Santa Clara Pueblo v. Martinez, 436 U.S. 49 (1978) Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians v. Holyfield, 490 U.S. 30 (1989) South Dakota v. Bourland, 508 U.S. 679 (1993) Civil rights Oliphant v. Suquamish Indian Tribe, 435 U.S. 191 (1978) United States v. Wheeler, 435 U.S. 313 (1978) Congressional authority Ex parte Joins, 191 U.S. 93 (1903) White Mountain Apache Tribe v. Bracker, 448 U.S. 136 (1980) California v. Cabazon Band of Mission Indians, 480 U.S. 202 (1987) South Dakota v. Bourland, 508 U.S. 679 (1993) United States v.
    [Show full text]
  • American Indian Law Journal
    American Indian Law Journal Volume III, Issue II • Spring 2015 “The Spirit of Justice” by Artist Terrance Guardipee Supported by the Center for Indian Law & Policy SPIRIT OF JUSTICE Terrence Guardipee and Catherine Black Horse donated this original work of art to the Center for Indian Law and Policy in November 2012 in appreciation for the work the Center engages in on behalf of Indian and Native peoples throughout the United States, including educating and training a new generation of lawyers to carry on the struggle for justice. The piece was created by Mr. Guardipee, who is from the Blackfeet Tribe in Montana and is known all over the country and internationally for his amazing ledger map collage paintings and other works of art. He was among the very first artists to revive the ledger art tradition and in the process has made it into his own map collage concept. These works of art incorporate traditional Blackfeet images into Mr. Guardipee’s contemporary form of ledger art. He attended the Institute of American Indian Arts in Sante Fe, New Mexico. His work has won top awards at the Santa Fe Market, the Heard Museum Indian Market, and the Autrey Museum Intertribal Market Place. He also has been featured a featured artists at the Smithsonian’s National Museum of the American Indian in Washington, D.C., along with the Museum of Natural History in Hanover, Germany, and the Hood Museum at Dartmouth College. American Indian Law Journal Editorial Board 2014-2015 Editor-in-Chief Jocelyn McCurtain Managing Editor Callie Tift Content Editor Executive Editor Jillian Held Nancy Mendez Articles Editors Writing Competition Chair Events Coordinator Jessica Buckelew Nick Major Leticia Hernandez Jonathan Litner 2L Staffers Paul Barrera - Jessica Barry J.
    [Show full text]
  • Filed the Case Against Indian Health Service and the Great Plains Tribal
    Case 5:18-cv-05087-JLV Document 1 Filed 12/04/18 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 UNTIED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA WESTERN DIVISION Charmaine White Face Plaintiir vs. Case No. iS'5o2n Jerrilyn Church, CEO,Great Plains Tribal Chairmen^s Health Board James Driving Hawk, Area Director Great Plains Area U. S. Indian Health Service Defendants COMPLAINT I. COMES NOW the Plaintiff, Charmaine White Face, and requests an Immediate Injunction be issued on any P.L. 93-638 Contract by the Defendants, Jerrilyn Church, CEO, Great Plains Tribal Chairmen's Health Board and James Driving Hawk,Area Director, Great Plains Area Indian Health Service based on the fact that such a contract will be a violation of the following: the Fort Laramie Treaty of 1868, Article 13; Article VI, U. S. Constitution; March 3'^'^ Act of 1871; 25CFR450(c)"Community Support for the contract"; 25CFR450 Section 103(D) "Community Support for the contract"; Amended Regulations 25CFR900: Section 900.3 Policy Statements (a)(l)(2); Section 900.3(b) Secretarial Policy(3)(4); Section 900.4 Effect on existing tribal rights(b); Subpart B- Deflnitions Section 900.6 Indian/Tribal Organization; and Subpart E- Declination Procedures Section 900.22(b)(e). This case involves a federal official and therefore falls under the federal question jurisdiction of federal court. II. Plaintiff, Charmaine White Face resides at 1315 East Saint Charles Street Rapid City. Pennington County. South Dakota. 57701.(6051 342-1626 Case 5:18-cv-05087-JLV Document 1 Filed 12/04/18 Page 2 of 8 PageID #: 2 in.
    [Show full text]
  • Norbeck Wildlife Preserve Landscape Assessment
    Norbeck Wildlife Preserve Landscape Assessment Black Hills National Forest Completed by: Continuing Education in Ecosystem Management Group Module XII June 12 – June 23, 2006 Acknowledgements This assessment would not have been possible without the assistance and patience of numerous individuals. We hope we spelled your name correctly and we are extremely grateful for all your help and assistance. Shelly Deisch – Ecologist, SD Game, Fish and Parks Gerard Baker - Superintendent, Mt. Rushmore National Memorial Bill Hill – Forester, Custer State Park Joe McFarland - Custer County, County Commissioner Ken Davis - Pennington County, County Commissioner Jim Brickley - Mayor Hill City Gary Brundige - Wildlife Biologist, Custer State Park Craig Pugsley - Recreation, Custer State Park Greg Josten – SD State Forestry Coe Foss – SD State Forestry Mike Pflaun, Chief Ranger Mt. Rushmore National Memorial Dan Licht, Reg. WL Biologist, Custer State Park Al Johnson – Owner, Palmer Gulch KOA Dave Ressler - Custer Chamber of Commerce Jim Sellars - Keystone Chamber of Commerce Mike Verchio - Hill City Chamber of Commerce Bob Demerssenan - Rapid City Chamber of Commerce John Forney - SD Tourism Committee Aaron Everett - Black Hills Forest Resource Association Justin Cutler - Recreational Adventures Co. Mike Jacobs – Black Hills Aerial Adventures Mike Dennyson - Developer Brian Brademeyer - Defenders of the Black Hills Sam Clawson - Sierra Club Jeremy Nichols - Biodiversity Conservation Alliance Colin Paterson - The Norbeck Society Nancy Hilding - Audubon
    [Show full text]
  • Our History Is the Future: Mni Wiconi and the Struggle for Native Liberation Nick Estes University of New Mexico - Main Campus
    University of New Mexico UNM Digital Repository American Studies ETDs Electronic Theses and Dissertations Fall 11-15-2017 Our History is the Future: Mni Wiconi and the Struggle for Native Liberation Nick Estes University of New Mexico - Main Campus Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/amst_etds Part of the American Studies Commons, Indigenous Studies Commons, Political History Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Estes, Nick. "Our History is the Future: Mni Wiconi and the Struggle for Native Liberation." (2017). https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/amst_etds/59 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Electronic Theses and Dissertations at UNM Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in American Studies ETDs by an authorized administrator of UNM Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Nick Estes Candidate American Studies Department This dissertation is approved, and it is acceptable in quality and form for publication: Approved by the Dissertation Committee: Dr. Jennifer Nez Denetdale, Chairperson Dr. David Correia Dr. Alyosha Goldstein Dr. Christina Heatherton i OUR HISTORY IS THE FUTURE: MNI WICONI AND THE STRUGGLE FOR NATIVE LIBERATION BY NICK ESTES B.A., History, University of South Dakota, 2008 M.A., History, University of South Dakota, 2013 DISSERTATION Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy PhD, American Studies The University of New Mexico Albuquerque, New Mexico December, 2017 ii DEDICATION For the Water Protectors, the Black Snake Killaz, the Land Defenders, the Treaty Councils, the Old Ones, the Good People of the Earth.
    [Show full text]
  • Jewel Cave National Monument Historic Resource Study
    PLACE OF PASSAGES: JEWEL CAVE NATIONAL MONUMENT HISTORIC RESOURCE STUDY 2006 by Gail Evans-Hatch and Michael Evans-Hatch Evans-Hatch & Associates Published by Midwestern Region National Park Service Omaha, Nebraska _________________________________ i _________________________________ ii _________________________________ iii _________________________________ iv Table of Contents Introduction 1 Chapter 1: First Residents 7 Introduction Paleo-Indian Archaic Protohistoric Europeans Rock Art Lakota Lakota Spiritual Connection to the Black Hills Chapter 2: Exploration and Gold Discovery 33 Introduction The First Europeans United States Exploration The Lure of Gold Gold Attracts Euro-Americans to Sioux Land Creation of the Great Sioux Reservation Pressure Mounts for Euro-American Entry Economic Depression Heightens Clamor for Gold Custer’s 1874 Expedition Gordon Party & Gold-Seekers Arrive in Black Hills Chapter 3: Euro-Americans Come To Stay: Indians Dispossessed 59 Introduction Prospector Felix Michaud Arrives in the Black Hills Birth of Custer and Other Mining Camps Negotiating a New Treaty with the Sioux Gold Rush Bust Social and Cultural Landscape of Custer City and County Geographic Patterns of Early Mining Settlements Roads into the Black Hills Chapter 4: Establishing Roots: Harvesting Resources 93 Introduction Milling Lumber for Homes, Mines, and Farms Farming Railroads Arrive in the Black Hills Fluctuating Cycles in Agriculture Ranching Rancher Felix Michaud Harvesting Timber Fires in the Forest Landscapes of Diversifying Uses _________________________________ v Chapter 5: Jewel Cave: Discovery and Development 117 Introduction Conservation Policies Reach the Black Hills Jewel Cave Discovered Jewel Cave Development The Legal Environment Developing Jewel Cave to Attract Visitors The Wind Cave Example Michauds’ Continued Struggle Chapter 6: Jewel Cave Under the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Present Position Assistant Professor and Co-Chair, Native American
    THEODORE C. VAN ALST, JR. Present Position Assistant Professor and Co-Chair, Native American Studies University of Montana Payne Family Native American Center—203A Missoula, MT 59812 406.243.5883 Office / 860.617.0499 Mobile / [email protected] Previous Position Assistant Dean Director, Native American Cultural Center Yale University June 2010-August 2014 EDUCATION Ph.D., Comparative Literary and Cultural Studies University of Connecticut, 2008 Dissertation – “How Quickly They Forget: American Indians in European Film, 1962-1976.” Co-Directors: Norma Bouchard & Robert Tilton M.A., Comparative Literary and Cultural Studies Concentration in Native American Film and Literature University of Connecticut, 2007 B. A. magna cum laude, Behavioral Science-Sociology University of Maine at Presque Isle, 2004 BOOKS AND CHAPTERS • The Faster Redder Road: The Best UnAmerican Stories of Stephen Graham Jones Vol. 1, University of New Mexico Press (April 2015). 408 pp. • “Lapin Noir: To Del Rio It Went.” A Critical Companion to the Fiction of Stephen Graham Jones, ed. Billy J. Stratton. University of New Mexico Press, (in press— Spring 2016). • “Pre-Contact Indigenous North America.” American Indian Health and Nursing, ed. Margaret Moss. New York, NY, Springer Publishing (December 2015). • “Contemporary Indigenous Health Issues.” American Indian Health and Nursing, ed. Margaret Moss. New York, NY, Springer Publishing (December 2015). • “Film in the Blood, Something in My Eye.” The Routledge Companion to Native American Literature, ed. Deborah L. Madsen. New York, N.Y., Routledge, (September 1, 2015) • “Navajo Joe.” Seeing Red: Hollywood’s Pixeled Skins, eds. Denise Cummings, LeAnne Howe, & Harvey Markowitz. Michigan State University Press. 2013. Pg.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 1 2 3 4 5 Federal Communications Commission 6
    1 1 2 3 4 5 FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION 6 BROADCAST LOCALISM HEARING 7 8 9 SOUTH DAKOTA SCHOOL OF MINES AND TECHNOLOGY RAPID CITY, SOUTH DAKOTA 10 MAY 26, 2004 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 2 1 (The hearing commenced at 5:45 p.m.) 2 COMMISSIONER ADELSTEIN: This hearing 3 of the Federal Communications Commission will 4 come to order. Good evening, everybody, and 5 welcome to the third hearing of the Federal 6 Communications Commission's Localism Task 7 Force. 8 My name is Jonathan Adelstein, and I'm one 9 of the five Commissioners on the Federal 10 Communications Commission. Thanks to Senator 11 Daschle I'm the first one ever from South Dakota 12 to serve on the FCC in the 75-year history of 13 the agency and the first one in fact to even 14 serve from any of the states in the upper Great 15 Plains. It's great to bring the FCC back home. 16 I'm thrilled that Commissioner Mike Copps 17 came with us here to my hometown to this hearing. 18 Commissioner Copps has been a great national 19 leader in the effort to make media more 20 responsive to local concerns and in the struggle 21 against media consolidation. 22 I should explain to everyone that until last 23 week, our chairman, Chairman Powell, fully 24 planned to be here. Unfortunately, the 25 President and Congressional leaders asked him to 3 1 participate in an event back in Washington, so 2 he had to return early this morning.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019-2020 Annual Report November 16, 2020 NNABA Annual Meeting
    2019-2020 Annual Report November 16, 2020 NNABA Annual Meeting Table of Contents I. Agenda II. Board Members and Delegates III. 2019-2020 President’s Report IV. Fiscal Year 2019 Treasurer’s Report V. Indian Country Highway Safety Plan 2020 VI. Pre-Law Summer Institute Materials VII. NNABA Foundation Scholarship Committee Report VIII. ABA Diversity & Inclusion Council Delegate’s Report IX. Proposed Resolution – UNDRIP X. Proposed Resolution – Invisibility Proposed Resolution and White Paper - Reparations XI. Sponsor Acknowledgments XII. Appendix a. 2019 Annual Meeting Minutes b. 2020 Membership Meeting Minutes c. 2019-2020 Board Resolutions 1 November 16, 2020 NNABA Annual Meeting 10:00 a.m. – 12:00 p.m. MST To join via computer: https://pillsburylaw.zoom.us/j/97641280031?pwd=cmpjZlJvRzVoa2d3dVpKS09RWDRXdz09 Passcode: Pillsbury1 To join via telephone: (877)853-5257 (Toll Free) Webinar ID: 976 4128 0031 Passcode: 0041621545 10:00 Call to Order, Welcome, & Approval of Agenda– Thomasina Real Bird, President 10:10 Remarks by American Bar Association Past Secretary – Mary L. Smith, Past President 10:20 Remarks by American Bar Association President – Patricia L. Refo 10:30 A Year In Review 2019-2020 President’s Report – Robert O. Saunooke Treasurer’s Report – Phil Brodeen 10:40 Presentation by American Bar Association Tribal Court Fellow – Honorable J. Matthew Martin 10:45 Presentations from Invited Organizations Doreen McPaul, Tribal In-House Counsel Association Rodina Cave Parnall, American Indian Law Center, Inc. – Pre-Law Summer Institute
    [Show full text]
  • CENSORED NEWS: Navajo Commercia… Delen Misbruik Rapporteren Volgende Blog» Blog Maken Aanmelden CENSORED NEWS
    23-6-2010 CENSORED NEWS: Navajo Commercia… Delen Misbruik rapporteren Volgende blog» Blog maken Aanmelden CENSORED NEWS Indigenous Peoples and Human Rights News Publisher: [email protected] US Social Forum Photos by Brita Wednesday, June 16, 2010 Brookes Navajo Commercial Farm Using Genetically Modified Seeds, Despite Global Protests By Brenda Norrell Censored News Photo by Brita Brookes. Click for more. http://www.bsnorrell.blogspot.com/ Photo 1: Schools for Chiapas, where Mayans oppose using genetically modified seeds which damage heritage crops Photo 2: Navajo Farming, book published 1979 While Indigenous Peoples protest Monsanto’s genetically modified seeds around the world, the Navajo Nation’s comm ercial farm , Navajo Agricultural Products Industries, continues to use these seeds for commercial crops. Haitian farmers are now burning donated Monsanto seeds. In India, Photo Brita Brookes. Click image thousands of farmers committed suicide after switching from traditional for more. seeds to genetically modified seeds. In Chiapas, Mayan farmers have refused to use the seeds which damaged heritage seed stock. Cross pollination from genetically modified seeds can endanger crops from US Social Forum ancient seed stock in the region. Photos by Orin Navajos have long planted century•old corn using traditional dry farming. Langelle Navajos relied on the stars to know when to plant and sometimes planted in spirals, according to Navajo elders in Rock Point, Arizona. …blogspot.com/…/navajo-commercial… 1/63 23-6-2010 CENSORED NEWS: Navajo Commercia… In the book Navajo Farming, are the words sang while planting in Canyon de Chelly, from the song, "In the Field of the Home God." "The holy blue corn seed I am planting.
    [Show full text]
  • George S. Mickelson Trail to Mt. Rushmore National Memorial Connector Trail Feasibility Study BLACK HILLS, SOUTH DAKOTA
    George S. Mickelson Trail to Mt. Rushmore National Memorial Connector Trail Feasibility Study BLACK HILLS, SOUTH DAKOTA Final Report September 2012 George S. Mickelson Trail to Mt. Rushmore National Memorial Connector Trail Study and Environmental Review Project Team Prepared For : South Dakota Department of Game Fish and Parks In cooperation with: US Forest Service Mount Rushmore National Memorial Society National Park Service And a special thank you to everyone who attended the open houses, one on one meetings and shared your vision for this trail. Prepared by: With: Matrix Consulting Group, Inc. Dakota Research, Inc., Consulting Arche- ologist 2009 © Wyss Associates, Inc. Birgil Kills Straight, Cultural Consultant Marmot’s Edge Conservation, Consulting Wildlife Biologist Cover Photo: 2009 © Wyss Associates, Inc. September 2012 Copyright © 2012 by Wyss Associates, Inc. All rights reserved. Published by Wyss Associates, Inc., Rapid City, South Dakota No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopy- ing, recording, scanning, or otherwise, except as permitted under Section 107 or 108 of the United States Copyright Act, without the prior written permission of the Publisher and The South Dakota Department of Game, Fish and Parks. Limit of Liability / Disclaimer of Warranty: While the author has used their best efforts in preparing this book, they make no representations or warranties with respect to the accuracy or completeness of the contents of this report and specifically disclaim any implied warranties of site specific applicability of the enclosed trail segments or routings. The advice and strategies contained here- in may be subject to modification based upon further study, the revelation of new information relating to the project and reinterpretations of existing knowledge of the study area.
    [Show full text]
  • Old Ground and New Directions at Sacred Sites on the Western Landscape
    University of Colorado Law School Colorado Law Scholarly Commons Articles Colorado Law Faculty Scholarship 2006 Old Ground and New Directions at Sacred Sites on the Western Landscape Kristen A. Carpenter University of Colorado Law School Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.law.colorado.edu/articles Part of the First Amendment Commons, Indian and Aboriginal Law Commons, Land Use Law Commons, Natural Resources Law Commons, and the Religion Law Commons Citation Information Kristen A. Carpenter, Old Ground and New Directions at Sacred Sites on the Western Landscape, 83 DENV. U. L. REV. 981 (2006), available at https://scholar.law.colorado.edu/articles/358. Copyright Statement Copyright protected. Use of materials from this collection beyond the exceptions provided for in the Fair Use and Educational Use clauses of the U.S. Copyright Law may violate federal law. Permission to publish or reproduce is required. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Colorado Law Faculty Scholarship at Colorado Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Articles by an authorized administrator of Colorado Law Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. +(,121/,1( Citation: 83 Denv. U. L. Rev. 981 2005-2006 Provided by: William A. Wise Law Library Content downloaded/printed from HeinOnline Tue Mar 28 13:42:47 2017 -- Your use of this HeinOnline PDF indicates your acceptance of HeinOnline's Terms and Conditions of the license agreement available at http://heinonline.org/HOL/License -- The search text of this PDF is generated from uncorrected OCR text.
    [Show full text]