Ben-Gurion University of the Negev

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Ben-Gurion University of the Negev Ben-Gurion University of the Negev Jacob Blaustein Institute for Desert Research Albert Katz International School for Desert Studies WATER BUDGET ANALYSIS AROUND THE DEAD SEA IN ISRAEL, JORDAN AND THE DISTRICT OF JERICHO Thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of "Master of Arts” By: Roee Elisha Date: 28.05.2006 Ben-Gurion University of the Negev Jacob Blaustein Institute for Desert Research Albert Katz International School for Desert Studies WATER BUDGET ANALYSIS AROUND THE DEAD SEA IN ISRAEL, JORDAN AND THE DISTRICT OF JERICHO Thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of "Master of Arts” By Roee Elisha Under the Supervision of: Prof. Hendrik J. Bruins Department of Man in the Desert Dr. Clive D. Lipchin The Arava Institute for Environmental Studies Author's signature …………….………………………… Date ……………. Approved by the Supervisors…… …… Date ………..……. Approved by the Chairman of the Graduated Program Committee …….……………. Date ……………… Abstract WATER BUDGET ANALYSIS AROUND THE DEAD SEA IN ISRAEL, JORDAN AND THE DISTRICT OF JERICHO Roee Elisha Thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of "Master of Arts” Ben-Gurion University of the Negev Jacob Blaustein Institutes for Desert Research Albert Katz International School for Desert Studies The water level of the Dead Sea has declined sharply in recent decades, causing dramatic changes in the local landscape of all three riparian entities: Israel, Jordan and the Palestinian Authority. Although numerous studies have dealt with the general causes and effects of the decline, little information is available regarding regional water supply and demand patterns in the Dead Sea area itself. Understanding such patterns is of great importance, as human activities in the area account for a staggering 46% of total water losses in the Dead Sea basin. Moreover, regional master plans indicate increased pressure on local water resources for the various economic activities around the lake, as well as for accommodating population growth. A detailed water budget analysis was conducted of the different water resources around the lake among the three political riparian entities. The aim of the research was to identify desirable levels of water supply that enable current and future economic activities to function, while at the same time minimizing the deterioration of resources. An evaluation was made for alternative practices concerning local water use and supply patterns in order to increase the elasticity of the local water system. The study suggests that demand levels will soon reach the limit of supply capabilities, thus disturbing the delicate water balance. Projected stress derives from both active policies, such as the damming of the eastern wadis of the Dead Sea, the depletion of fossil aquifers, and the underutilization of captured runoff waters. Additional stress stems from negligence, as there are substantial water losses resulting from leakages and an underutilization of wastewater. Furthermore, the pricing system of water often fails to provide any major economic incentives for dissuading the major users from over-consumption or from inefficient utilization of their water sources. As for the agricultural sector, the study revealed that in all three political entities, scarce water resources were overused in order to grow non-arid tolerant crops in one of the most arid climates in the world. Recommendations are offered for achieving a long-term water balance in the Dead Sea area. An in-lieu recharge scheme was suggested for the Israeli and Palestinian domains. Within this scheme, it is advisable to consider the feasibility of directing wastewater generated and treated in the coastal plain to the Dead Sea area for industrial scrubbing and washing purposes and for the irrigation of fields in Kikar Sdom. In addition to wastewater import, the industrial sector should consider wastewater reuse. Thus, much water currently used by the Dead Sea Works can be stored and used for the growing needs of the tourist sector. In Jericho, treated wastewater levels should be tripled to supply one-third of the total amount of water used by the agricultural sector. Consequently, a considerable amount of freshwater currently used for crops irrigation can be directed to the growing needs of the domestic sector. The introduction of “new” water resources in the form of wastewater reuse for agriculture purposes in the Jordanian domain would improve the management of a scarce resource. Finally, the economic and cultural feasibility of modifying agricultural production to include more arid-tolerant crops, which consume less water, should be investigated. This thesis presents for the first time a comprehensive water budget for the entire Dead Sea region, which is vital information for policy development by government agencies, NGO’s and decision makers. An understanding of the current water budget, potential future requirements, and the available water resources are necessary for the development of long-term water resource management in the Dead Sea region. Acknowledgements This work was supported through a scholarship of the Programme of the European Commission Research Directorate General, as part of the project, “The Future of the Dead Sea Basin: Options for a more Sustainable Water Management.” I am very grateful for the remarkable guidance of my supervisors, Prof. Hendrik J. Bruins and Dr. Clive D. Lipchin. I would like to express my great appreciation to Prof. Bruins who contributed much from his wide academic experience and knowledge to my research and skills. I am also exceedingly grateful to Dr. Lipchin for accompanying me during the last two years during which he patiently instilled in me methods of learning. Without both of their help, this thesis would not have been written in such a way that I am proud of. Thanks to Noa Yachot, Tzipporah Ben-Avraham, Phoenix Lawhon and Ilana Meallem who helped immensely in the linguistic aspect of this thesis. Special thanks are given to David Lehrer, Prof. Yair Zarmi and Prof. Avigad Vonshak who were attentive to my economic needs throughout the last two years. Many thanks to the Arava Institute for Environmental Studies’ staff who provided me with the tools to view and analyze the world more environmentally. My appreciation goes to the Albert Katz Institute International School for Desert Studies which provided me the best study conditions a student could ask for. I am grateful to Dorit Levin for her patience kindness and help in administration-related issues. I would like to thank all the project’s colleagues and the specialists who provided me with the required information for this thesis as well as my friends who supported me with a great deal of love. Foremost, very special thanks to my dear family who provided me with warmth, love and support. Without their help this thesis would have never been written. Table of contents Page 1. Introduction……………………………………………………………………..1-34 1.1 Water Scarcity In the Arid Realm……………………………………………..…1-4 1.2 Relevance And Limitations of the Water Balance Approach……………………4-9 1.3 Background Information………………………………………………………...9-28 1.3.1 Water Scarcity East and West of Jordan River……………………………..9-13 1.3.2 General Physiography of the Dead Sea……………… ..………………….13-16 1.3.3 Geological Development of the DS Basin………...…….………………....16-17 1.3.4 Economic Activities Around The Dead Sea…….…………………………17-18 1.3.5 Recent Fluctuations of the Dead Sea Water Level………………………...19-20 1.3.6 Dead Sea Lake Level Fluctuations in the Past………………………………..20 1.3.7 Rainfall and Dead Sea Level since the Availability of Meteorological Data……………………………………………………………..…………22-28 1.3.8 Anthropogenic Impact…………………………………………………......10-13 1.3.8.1 Water Diversion……………………………………………………..23-26 1.3.8.2 Loss of Water through Industrial Evaporation Ponds to Obtain DS Minerals….…………………………………………………….……26-27 1.3.8.3 Loss of Water through Wells Water Pumping …………….………..27-28 1.3.8.4 Water Use By Agriculture in the DS area………………………………28 1.4 Relevance of this Thesis……………………………………………………..28-33 1.5 Main Objectives and Hypothesis for the MA Research………………………...34 Page 2. Research Design………………………………………………………………..35-62 2.1 Research Subject……………………………………………………………….35 2.2 Research questions………………………………………………………….35-36 2.3 Study Area………………………………………………………………….36-38 2.4 Social Economy of the Study Area…………………………………………38-40 2.5 General information on the “Dead Sea Project”…………………….………….41 2.6 Data Collection for the MA Research within the Framework of the “Dead Sea Project”………………………………………………………...42-44 2.6.1 Data Collection Duration and Period………………………………………42 2.6.2 Problems Encountered and Solutions………………………….……….42-44 2.7 Data collection in the Israeli study area……………………………………..45-51 2.7.1 Data collection of water resources and their quality…………………...45-47 2.7.2 Data collection of water allocation and consumption in the Israeli study area……………………………………………………………...….47 2.7.3 Data collection of water allocation and consumption within the industrial sector in the Israeli study area.…………………………47-48 2.7.4 Data collection of water allocation and consumption within the agricultural sector in the Israeli study area………………………….…48-51 2.7.4.1 Data collection of water allocation and consumption within the tourism sector in the Israeli study area………………………...49 2.7.4.2 Data collection of water allocation and consumption within the domestic sector in the Israeli study area…….…………...50 Page 2.7.4.3 Data collection of the types
Recommended publications
  • An Archaeologist's View
    Journal of Book of Mormon Studies Volume 15 Number 2 Article 8 7-31-2006 An Archaeologist's View Jeffrey R. Chadwick Brigham Young University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/jbms BYU ScholarsArchive Citation Chadwick, Jeffrey R. (2006) "An Archaeologist's View," Journal of Book of Mormon Studies: Vol. 15 : No. 2 , Article 8. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/jbms/vol15/iss2/8 This Feature Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Book of Mormon Studies by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Title An Archaeologist’s View Author(s) Jeffrey R. Chadwick Reference Journal of Book of Mormon Studies 15/2 (2006): 68–77, 122–24. ISSN 1065-9366 (print), 2168-3158 (online) Abstract Seasoned archaeologist Jeffrey R. Chadwick responds to studies done by Warren Aston (see page 8), Richard Wellington and George Potter (see page 26), and Kent Brown (see page 44) pertaining to the trail that the Book of Mormon prophet Lehi took after fleeing Jerusalem. Chadwick uses his archaeological, histori- cal, and scriptural knowledge to comment on the claims made by the other scholars. He specifically ana- lyzes Lehi’s life in Jerusalem, the route Lehi took from Jerusalem to the Red Sea, the Valley of Lemuel, the route from Shazer to Nahom, the route from Nahom to Bountiful, and the building of the ship at Bountiful. Streambed in a Yemen wadi.
    [Show full text]
  • Israel's National Religious and the Israeli- Palestinian Conflict
    Leap of Faith: Israel’s National Religious and the Israeli- Palestinian Conflict Middle East Report N°147 | 21 November 2013 International Crisis Group Headquarters Avenue Louise 149 1050 Brussels, Belgium Tel: +32 2 502 90 38 Fax: +32 2 502 50 38 [email protected] Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................... i Recommendations..................................................................................................................... iv I. Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 1 II. Religious Zionism: From Ascendance to Fragmentation ................................................ 5 A. 1973: A Turning Point ................................................................................................ 5 B. 1980s and 1990s: Polarisation ................................................................................... 7 C. The Gaza Disengagement and its Aftermath ............................................................. 11 III. Settling the Land .............................................................................................................. 14 A. Bargaining with the State: The Kookists ................................................................... 15 B. Defying the State: The Hilltop Youth ........................................................................ 17 IV. From the Hills to the State ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Israeli Settlements in the Jordan Valley
    Ü Bisan UV90 Givat Sa'alit UV60 Mechola The Occupied Shadmot Mehola Jordan Valley Rotem Tayasir (Northern Area) Occupied Palestine (West Bank) Maskiot Hemdat Ro'i Beka'ot UV57 UV90 Hamra Overview Hamra Jordan Valley Area 1948 Armatice Line Palestinian Communities UV57 Main & Bypass road Argaman Regional road Mechora Jk Crossing Points Israeli Settlements Built up area (Closed by Israel in 2000) Permeter Cultivated land UV60 Municipal boundries UV57 Massu'a Israeli Administrative Restrictions Damiya Gittit Interim Agreement Areas Area A Ma'ale Efrayim Jordan Area B Area C Closed Military Areas Ma'ale Efraim UV60 Yafit Israeli Physical Access Restrictions Ç !¬ Green Line checkpoint Ç !¬ Checkpoint Petza'el !Ǭ Partial Checkpoint ") Roadblock # Earthmound GÌ Road gate - closed GÌ Road gate - open Tomer DD DD DD DD DD DD Road barrier DDDDDDDDDD Earthwall Trench Gilgal Israeli Segregation Barrier Netiv Hagedud Constructed Under Construction Projected Niran Kochav Hashachar Ahavat Hayim Mitzpe Keramim Ma'ale Shlomo Yitav Rimmonim Jenin Yitav ( Al Auja) Tubas Omer Farm Tulkarm Nablus Mevo'ot Jericho Na'ama Tel Aviv-Yaffo Salfit Allenby / King Hussein Ramallah UV60 Jericho Jericho East Jerusalem Jericho Bethlehem Hebron UV90 Vered Yericho Givat Barkay Beit Holga - Mul Nevo Mitzpe Yericho Beit Ha`arava Kilometers 0 1 2 4 6 8 1 Dead Sea Ü UV90 Allenby / King Hussein Jericho UV90 The Occupied Jordan Valley Vered Yericho Givat Barkay Beit Holga - Mul Nevo (Southern Area) Occupied Palestine Mitzpe Yericho (West Bank) UV90 Beit Ha`arava Dead Sea Almog
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 199 February 2015
    Applied Research Institute - Jerusalem (ARIJ) P.O Box 860, Caritas Street – Bethlehem, Phone: (+972) 2 2741889, Fax: (+972) 2 2776966. [email protected] | http://www.arij.org Applied Research Institute – Jerusalem Report on the Israeli Colonization Activities in the West Bank & the Gaza Strip Volume 199 , February 2015 Issue http://www.arij.org Bethlehem Israeli settlers escorted by the Israeli Occupation Army (IOA) stormed an under construction building in Khalail Al-Louz area, south of Bethlehem city, occupied an apartment and raised the Israeli flags on the top of the building. (Maannews 3 February 2015) Israeli Occupation Army (IOA) handed out 13 military orders to confiscate and evacuate lands (8.3 dunums) in Khallit Al-Qatten area in Artas village, south of Bethlehem city. (Shasha News 3 February 2015) Israeli Occupation Army (IOA) razed land and conducted excavation works in “Ein Al-Haniya” area near Al-Walaja village, west of Bethlehem city. (Al-Quds 4 February 2015) Clashes erupted between Palestinians and the Israeli Occupation Army (IOA) in Ayda refugee camp, north of Bethlehem city. The IOA fired teargas and stun grenades at Palestinians and houses, causing dozens of suffocation cases. (Al-Quds 6 February 2015) Israeli Occupation Army (IOA) attacked a non-violent protest against the closure of the road link between Surif and Al-Jab’a villages, southwest of Bethlehem governorate. The IOA assaulted the participants and tried to prevent them from opening the road. (Wafa 7 February 2015) Israeli Occupation Army (IOA) stationed at DCO checkpoint in Bethlehem governorate, opened fire at a Palestinian vehicle. (RB2000 8 February 2015) Israeli Occupation Army (IOA) raided and searched a number of Palestinian houses and stores in Husan village, west of Bethlehem city.
    [Show full text]
  • November 2014 Al-Malih Shaqed Kh
    Salem Zabubah Ram-Onn Rummanah The West Bank Ta'nak Ga-Taybah Um al-Fahm Jalameh / Mqeibleh G Silat 'Arabunah Settlements and the Separation Barrier al-Harithiya al-Jalameh 'Anin a-Sa'aidah Bet She'an 'Arrana G 66 Deir Ghazala Faqqu'a Kh. Suruj 6 kh. Abu 'Anqar G Um a-Rihan al-Yamun ! Dahiyat Sabah Hinnanit al-Kheir Kh. 'Abdallah Dhaher Shahak I.Z Kfar Dan Mashru' Beit Qad Barghasha al-Yunis G November 2014 al-Malih Shaqed Kh. a-Sheikh al-'Araqah Barta'ah Sa'eed Tura / Dhaher al-Jamilat Um Qabub Turah al-Malih Beit Qad a-Sharqiyah Rehan al-Gharbiyah al-Hashimiyah Turah Arab al-Hamdun Kh. al-Muntar a-Sharqiyah Jenin a-Sharqiyah Nazlat a-Tarem Jalbun Kh. al-Muntar Kh. Mas'ud a-Sheikh Jenin R.C. A'ba al-Gharbiyah Um Dar Zeid Kafr Qud 'Wadi a-Dabi Deir Abu Da'if al-Khuljan Birqin Lebanon Dhaher G G Zabdah לבנון al-'Abed Zabdah/ QeiqisU Ya'bad G Akkabah Barta'ah/ Arab a-Suweitat The Rihan Kufeirit רמת Golan n 60 הגולן Heights Hadera Qaffin Kh. Sab'ein Um a-Tut n Imreihah Ya'bad/ a-Shuhada a a G e Mevo Dotan (Ganzour) n Maoz Zvi ! Jalqamus a Baka al-Gharbiyah r Hermesh Bir al-Basha al-Mutilla r e Mevo Dotan al-Mughayir e t GNazlat 'Isa Tannin i a-Nazlah G d Baqah al-Hafira e The a-Sharqiya Baka al-Gharbiyah/ a-Sharqiyah M n a-Nazlah Araba Nazlat ‘Isa Nazlat Qabatiya הגדה Westהמערבית e al-Wusta Kh.
    [Show full text]
  • 78% of Construction Was in “Isolated Settlements”*
    Peace Now’s Annual Settlement Construction Report for 2017 Construction Starts in Settlements were 17% Above Average in 2017 78% of Construction was in “Isolated Settlements”* Settlement Watch, Peace Now Key findings – Construction in the West Bank, 2017 (East Jerusalem excluded) 1 According to Peace Now's count, 2,783 new housing units began construction in 2017, around 17% higher than the yearly average rate since 2009.2 78% (2,168 housing units) of the new construction was in settlements east of the proposed Geneva Initiative border, i.e. settlements that are likely to be evicted in a two-state agreement. 36% (997 housing units) of the new construction was in areas that are east of the route of the separation barrier. Another 46% (1,290 units) was between the built and the planned route of the fence. Only 18% was west of the built fence. At least 10% (282 housing units) of the construction was illegal according to the Israeli laws applied in the Occupied Territories (regardless of the illegality of all settlements according to the international law). Out of those, 234 units (8% of the total construction) were in illegal outposts. The vast majority of the new construction, 91% (2,544 housing units), was for permanent structures, while that the remainder 9% were new housing units in the shape of mobile homes both in outposts and in settlements. 68 new public buildings (such as schools, synagogues etc.) started to be built, alongside 69 structures for industry or agriculture. Advancement of Plans and Tenders (January-December 2017) 6,742 housing units were advanced through promotions of plans for settlements, in 59 different settlements (compared to 2,657 units in 2016).
    [Show full text]
  • English Version
    :ÎÊ·ÇAÎj?fb< “Preliminary Study” e content of this publication is the sole responsibility of ARIJ and can under no circumstances be regarded as reecting the position of RLS Trading your Neighbours Water 1 Table Of Contents 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 3 2. Existing Research ...................................................................................................................... 4 3. Main Findings ................................................................................................................................ 6 3.1. Water Allocation ................................................................................................................ 6 3.2. Agriculture .........................................................................................................................12 3.3. Product Export .................................................................................................................18 3.4. Virtual Water ....................................................................................................................19 4. Conclusion ..................................................................................................................................21 5. Recommendations .....................................................................................................................22 List Of Tables Table 1: The water allocation to the settlements
    [Show full text]
  • Financing Land Grab
    [Released under the Official Information Act - July 2018] 1 Financing Land Grab The Direct Involvement of Israeli Banks in the Israeli Settlement Enterprise February 2017 [Released under the Official Information Act - July 2018] 2 [Released under the Official Information Act - July 2018] 3 Financing Land Grab The Direct Involvement of Israeli Banks in the Israeli Settlement Enterprise February 2017 [Released under the Official Information Act - July 2018] 4 Who Profits from the Occupation is a research center dedicated to exposing the commercial involvement of Israeli and international companies in the continued Israeli control over Palestinian and Syrian land. Who Profits operates an online database, which includes information concerning companies that are commercially complicit in the occupation. In addition, the center publishes in-depth reports and flash reports about industries, projects and specific companies. Who Profits also serves as an information center for queries regarding corporate involvement in the occupation. In this capacity, Who Profits assists individuals and civil society organizations working to end the Israeli occupation and to promote international law, corporate social responsibility, social justice and labor rights. www.whoprofits.org | [email protected] [Released under the Official Information Act - July 2018] 5 Contents Executive Summary 7 Introduction 10 Israeli Construction on Occupied Land 14 Benefits for Homebuyers and Contractors in Settlements 16 Financing Construction on Occupied Land 20 The Settlement
    [Show full text]
  • Directions to Biblical Tamar Park
    Directions to Biblical Tamar Park Address Biblical Tamar Park Ir Ovot D. N. Arava 86805 ISRAEL Supervisor’s phone 052-426-0266 Directions to BTP by Train and Bus from Ben Gurion Airport After exiting customs at Ben Gurion International Airport in Tel Aviv, you will be on the ground level. Take a left after you pass through the people waiting to pick up other passengers. (Take a right to exchange some money if you need to do that first. You can also rent cell phones in this area.) After taking the left, follow the signs to the train station. You will take a right at airport exit #3. Go through the doors and down the hallway. Off to your left, you will see the turnstiles for the train. Walk through that opening in the hallway, before the turnstiles, off to your left is the ticket window. Go to the ticket window and ask for a ticket to Beersheva Central. (Note: If the train is not running for some unknown reason, you will have to take the bus instead. Have someone direct you to the bus stop and take the bus to the Central Bus Station, where you can get a ticket to Tamar like you would at Beersheva.) The train ticket price should be around 32 shekels. You have to change trains once, and they may mention this to you when you buy the ticket. Just tell them you know you have to change trains. Then, proceed to the turnstiles just before the stairs or escalator. You need to put your train ticket through a machine to activate the turnstile.
    [Show full text]
  • Tourism Booklet for the Central Arava
    www.studioarava.co.il | Illustration: Daphne Shani 6 Accommodation 16 Sites and Attractions 30 Dining in the Arava 38 Therapies and Treatments 42 Health and Natural Food Products 46 Art, Crafts, Gifts, and Workshops 50 Entertainment and Nightlife 52 A VACATION TO REMEMBER General Visitor Information Experience the magic of the Arava Desert Welcome to the Arava, a biblical region abundant in scenery stretching over 200 square kilometers and home to 3,500 residents inhabiting various forms of income-sharing Haifa communities. The main livelihood here is agriculture: we grow hothouse bell peppers, dates, melons, tomatoes, tropical fish, algae and cows and goats’ milk - to name just a few of our products - Tel-Aviv which is why we are on the cutting edge of advanced agriculture in arid conditions. In addition, we are situated further from Israel’s center than any other region. This distance results in - or perhaps attracts - creativity and ingenuity and an unconventional mindset. Here you will meet artists and crafters, owners of unique businesses, practitioners of a myriad of therapies, facilitators of workshops for every age group and interest, a cultural landscape Jerusalem that combines professional with “home-grown”, and quality education and community. Beer Sheva The innovation inspired by Arava life has also led to the establishment of unique tourist attractions based on our treasured natural landscape that enables a sense of complete freedom. Herein you will find a complete guide to our accommodation, visitor sites, activities, dining,
    [Show full text]
  • Made in Israel: Agricultural Exports from Occupied Territories
    Agricultural Made in Exports from Israel Occupied Territories April 2014 Agricultural Made in Exports from Israel Occupied Territories April 2014 The Coalition of Women for Peace was established by bringing together ten feminist peace organizations and non-affiliated activist women in Israel. Founded soon after the outbreak of the Second Intifada in 2000, CWP today is a leading voice against the occupation, committed to feminist principles of organization and Jewish-Palestinian partnership, in a relentless struggle for a just society. CWP continuously voices a critical position against militarism and advocates for radical social and political change. Its work includes direct action and public campaigning in Israel and internationally, a pioneering investigative project exposing the occupation industry, outreach to Israeli audiences and political empowerment of women across communities and capacity-building and support for grassroots activists and initiatives for peace and justice. www.coalitionofwomen.org | [email protected] Who Profits from the Occupation is a research center dedicated to exposing the commercial involvement of Israeli and international companies in the continued Israeli control over Palestinian and Syrian land. Currently, we focus on three main areas of corporate involvement in the occupation: the settlement industry, economic exploitation and control over population. Who Profits operates an online database which includes information concerning companies that are commercially complicit in the occupation. Moreover, the center publishes in-depth reports and flash reports about industries, projects and specific companies. Who Profits also serves as an information center for queries regarding corporate involvement in the occupation – from individuals and civil society organizations working to end the Israeli occupation and to promote international law, corporate social responsibility, social justice and labor rights.
    [Show full text]
  • Seizing the Mandate: Boycotting Products from Illegal Settlements
    SEIZING THE MANDATE: BOYCOTTING PRODUCTS FROM ILLEGAL SETTLEMENTS Interstar This report was prepared by researchers with United Methodists for Kairos Response (UMKR).* About UMKR: UMKR is a global grassroots network of laity and clergy within the United Methodist Church working to align the denomination’s actions with its statements calling for an end to Israel’s occupation of Palestinian land. Responding to an urgent call from Palestinian Christians in the Kairos Palestine Document, UMKR advocates principled investment decisions and consumer choices that will help end the occupation. Through research, education and advocacy, UMKR seeks to implement the Church’s call to use non-violent means of securing a just peace for all the peoples of Israel and Palestine. UMKR works closely with interfaith and ecumenical partners in its work. Many of our volunteers have visited the Israeli settlements in the West Bank and seen the companies that operate there. They have met with Israelis and Palestinians who have documented the presence of companies in the settlements. They have seen first-hand the effects of Israel’s occupation on Christians and Muslims in the Holy Land and are resolved to end it. About United Methodist Policy: The General Conference is the policy making body for the United Methodist denomination. In 2012, the General Conference called on all nations to prohibit the import of products from Israeli settlements. (See page 1.) The church has long opposed Israel’s occupation of land beyond its internationally recognized borders, and
    [Show full text]