Appendix A: Introduction to SGML

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Appendix A: Introduction to SGML Appendix A: Introduction to SGML This appendix gives a very brief introduction to SGML. This should be enough to carry a reader through the first part of this book. If you are not already familiar with SGML, you will benefit from some additional reading. The bibliography lists several books on SGML; van Herwijnen 1994 is a popular and accessible introduction. What is SGML, really? SGML is short for Standard Generalized Markup Language, and it is defined by ISO Standard 8879 (1986). It provides a flexible and portable way of representing documents on computers, where you can choose what kinds of components occur in each particular type of document, and then clearly label those parts as they occur. The foundation of SGML, and to my thinking the primary reason it has gained such wide acceptance, is very simple: It lets you describe document structures directly, rather than describing something temporary like formatting, that depends on the structure. Simply put, SGML lets you tell the truth about your documents. This is reflected in five key characteristics that form the basis of its wide acceptance: • Descriptive markup: An SGML document consists of objects of various classes (chapters, titles, references, repair procedures, graphic objects, poems, etc.), not sequences of formatting instructions. These objects are called elements, and each one has a generic element type. SGML marks Ehe boundaries of elements using start- and end- tags . For example, a quotation could be stored as: I<QUOTATION>Full speed ahead</QUOTATION> I 19 6 DeRose By labeling elements themselves rather than saying what to do with them, SGML avoids locking information into one program or e,)en one purpose. Processing for various purposes is specified separately, often by style sheets or similar mechanisms. • Hierarchical structure: Elements can contain one another in a hierarchy (a chapter can contain a title and several sections which in turn contain other elements). Therefore one can create, manipulate and manage not only "chapter titles," as in word processors, but also chapters as complete units. Hierarchies are also called "trees" because they branch repeatedly, and every sub-branch comes from only one "parent" branch. For example, a chapter might be stored as: I<CHAPTER><TITLE>Get t ing Started</TITLE> <SECTION><TITLE>Overview of SGML</TITLE> <P> SGML is_</P> </SECTION></CHAPTER> A tree is a significantly different and more powerful model than the flat list or slightly hierarchical structures used in many word processor and database products. • Flexibility: SGML does not dictate what types of components may appear in a document or how they relate. Individuals or groups can define types appropriate for their kinds of documents. For example, manuals need parts lists and procedures, catalogs needs prices and descriptions, while literary texts need a quite different variety of structures. Nevertheless, a single SGML implementation can work with all of these. There is no need for new software for each new set of element types. • Formal specification: The specific elements contained in an SGML document are declared before the document begins in the DTD, or Document Type Declaration. After reading a DTD, programs called validating parsers can check SGML documents and detect many kinds of errors. Of course they cannot detect all errors: If you create a poem and tell the computer it is just a plain paragraph (or a repair procedure), validity checking won't help much. • Human-readable representation: Finally, SGML provides a plain-text format for all this information. This means that one can read and write SGML documents not only with sophisticated SGML-aware tools, but even with no tools beyond any computer's everyday text handling commands (such as "type" or "edit"). Even without knowing SGML it isn't hard to figure out that this represents an emphasized word: I<EMPH>very</EMPH> Simple yet formal representations based on readable embedded markup within the data have another important advantage: they are machine-independent. The internal file formats most programs use seldom survive transfer across networks, from one make of computer to another, or across national borders. SGML does. This is a vast improvement, especially over the proprietary binary representations programs typically use for optimizing internal operations. SGML's key characteristics have little to do with specific kinds of processing (such as formatting or retrieval) or specific interfaces. By leaving these issues undefined (while ensuring that the structural information needed to determine them is defined), SGML encourages building systems that use the best processing and interface technologies available in any situation. Because of this SGML data lasts far longer than other The SGML FAQ Book 197 representations, and a single SGML source document can be "re-purposed" for a wide variety of uses, often with no changes at all. The key characteristics also have very little to do with syntax, or the formal grammar rules that govern just how SGML represents structured information. Syntax is important because only after agreeing on some syntax can programs exchange data. However, the greatest value of SGML stems from its use of descriptive markup methodology, not from the details of its rules. The syntax could have been standardized in a number of other ways without diminishing that value or the others described above. SGML documents can be created, edited and otherwise processed with generic editors or with WYSIWYG editors that look like typical word processors. Cooperating authors often use different methods and programs on the same documents. In the same way, the result of authoring can be processed unchanged for many different purposes, such as local printing, high-quality typesetting, display in Braille, information retrieval, linguistic analysis, or hypertext browsing. No representation that is based mainly on formatting can do that. Formatting and structure Strong separation of formatting from structure is a hallmark of good SGML use. However, just using the standard cannot ensure such good practice. It is possible, even easy, to use "legal" SGML syntax with tags that represent only formatting information, but doing this loses many benefits SGML is meant to provide. For example, it is easy to make a set of SGML element types that looks like a raw formatting language. A block quote might then be tagged as follows: <SK><DS><IN L="+I0" R="-10">The quotation... I<SK><IL L="+10">The following paragraph_. Even worse, someone could just put "<DOC>...</DOC>" around a document in any other representation and call it SGML: <DOC> .sk;.ds;.in +i0 -i0; The quotation... .sk;.il +i0; The following paragraph.. <DOC> Given corresponding DTDs, both these approaches yield perfectly legal, syntactically correct SGML for which a validating SGML parser would report no errors. However, the information is no more portable or communicative than if it were not using SGML: SGML syntax is merely being a veneer over non-descriptive, non-hierarchical markup, whose meaning is not accessible to the SGML processor for validation or use. In contrast, the following SGML coding is clearer, more concise, easier to maintain, more efficient and more useful for a wide range of purposes: <QUO>The quotation...</QUO> I<P>The following paragrap~..</P> 19 8 DeRose Parts of an SGML document An SGML document is divided into three major parts: • An SGML declaration gives general information about SGML syntax options. It says what character set is used, how long element type names can be, what delimiter strings (such as "<" and "</") separate tags from content, what optional SGML features are used, and so on. Many SGML parsers allow the declaration to be omitted. Then standard default settings are used, called the reference concrete syntax. This book assumes these settings except that element and other names may exceed the default eight-character limit. • A Document Type Declaration or DTD says what element types and other components are permitted in the document, using detailed markup declarations. The declarations also say which element types can contain which others. For example, footnotes might not be allowed to contain chapters. • A document instance includes the content of a document as well as the tags and other markup that indicate where elements of each type start and end. A document instance can be stored in more than one file by dividing it up into parts called entities, and may include data in other media and formats by reference as described below. Parts of an SGML document instance This section gives a brief review of how documents are tagged using SGML and how tagging schemes are declared in DTDs, then shows the complete SGML markup for a short example document. Conceptually, an SGML document instance includes content and structure, such as graphics, video, text, indications of structural components, and links. In terms of syntax or representation, it has four major kinds of objects each of which has a corresponding type of declaration that can appear in the DTD. Once declared, actual instances of these objects may be used in the document instance. Hements divide the document into meaningful conceptual components, each of which has some name, such as chapter, part-number, or task. The name is called an element type or generic identifier ("GI"). Elements are marked by tags at their start and end, that in turn are marked off by special strings called delimiters. Attributes may be specified for elements and give information about a particular instance of the element type such as a security level or a unique identifier. Each attribute has a name, a type, and a rule about default values. Attributes appear within start-tags. Entity references are a way to include data by reference, and are resolved by the SGML parser and replaced by their values: either externally stored information or strings defined in the DTD.
Recommended publications
  • Web Protocols UR What? URI Syntax Internationalisation
    CS314 - 29 UR what? Web Protocols ! URI: Uniform Resource Identifier ! URI, URN, URL " Uniquely identifies a data entity " ! Internationalisation Obeys a specific syntax " schemeName:specificStuff ! Role of HTML and XML ! URN: Uniform Resource Name ! HTTP and HTTPS " A URI that only names something " interacting via the Web " Example: urn:isbn:0-534-38317-3 ! URL: Uniform Resource Locator " A URI that points to an actual resource " Example: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/URL 1 2 URI syntax Internationalisation ! The Unicode standard defines character sets for any URI = scheme ":" hier-part script [ "?" query ] [ "#" fragment ] " variable length character codes, usually encoded in bytes in UTF-8 format ! The hierarchical part can start with // and uses / to separate components. There are other reserved " 8-bit ASCII is a proper subset of UTF-8 characters ! Internationalising DNS names, URIs and email addresses in UTF-8 is not simple http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/URL " Yet most people in the world have names like Fältström, scheme top of hierarchy (note reversal - next next name DNS writes right to left!) level level ! (DNS is case-independent but URI is case-sensitive) internationalised content and interaction 3 4 *ML *ML parsers ! In 1969, three IBMers invented GML (Generalised ! Strictly speaking, a pure SGML parser can parse Markup Language) HTML, XML or XHTML ! In the early 1980s it became SGML (Standard GML) ! In practice, HTML is written sloppily with proprietary ! Around 1990, Tim Berners-Lee and Robert Cailliau extensions invented
    [Show full text]
  • Torbjorn Borison
    Object Synchronisation and Security for Mobile Communication Devices By Torbjörn Borison Royal Institute of Technology Kungliga Tekniska Högskolan 2001-09-20 Examiner and academic Prof. Gerald Maguire Supervisor: Department of Teleinformatics Royal Institute of Technology Corporate Supervisor: Johan Hedin Ericsson Radio System AB Abstract The main objective of this master’s thesis project was to investigate and find solutions to the problem of how to combine the SyncML synchronisation specification with object security and thus protection of personal information, such as contacts and calendar entries in mobile devices. SyncML is a new synchronisation specification agreed upon by major device developers (Ericsson, Palm, Motorola, etc.) and the major synchronisation server developers (Starfish, Puma, fusionOne, etc.). It is independent of transport (HTTP, WSP, or OBEX) platform, operating system, and application and simplifies synchronisation of personal information between dissimilar SyncML supportive devices. SyncML compliant devices are fully capable of synchronising information with a third party operated Internet based server and a desktop computer. This allows us to access, up-date and maintain information independent of Intranets or geographical position. However, synchronising and storing confidential personal information on an third party operated Internet based server entails weaknesses in our personal information security. Even if transport and storage security are used, how secure is the server where this information is stored since this server has the highest probability of being attacked. Can we really trust that an employee or other person with valid appropriated administrators access to the storage facility with the appropriate knowledge, working together with the third party server operator, won’t try to access our stored information? To prevent this, the personal information’s confidentiality must be guaranteed before the information leaves the device.
    [Show full text]
  • SGML As a Framework for Digital Preservation and Access. INSTITUTION Commission on Preservation and Access, Washington, DC
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 417 748 IR 056 976 AUTHOR Coleman, James; Willis, Don TITLE SGML as a Framework for Digital Preservation and Access. INSTITUTION Commission on Preservation and Access, Washington, DC. ISBN ISBN-1-887334-54-8 PUB DATE 1997-07-00 NOTE 55p. AVAILABLE FROM Commission on Preservation and Access, A Program of the Council on Library and Information Resources, 1400 16th Street, NW, Suite 740, Washington, DC 20036-2217 ($20). PUB TYPE Reports Evaluative (142) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC03 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *Access to Information; Computer Oriented Programs; *Electronic Libraries; *Information Retrieval; Library Automation; Online Catalogs; *Preservation; Standards IDENTIFIERS Digital Technology; *SGML ABSTRACT This report explores the suitability of Standard Generalized Markup Language (SGML) as a framework for building, managing, and providing access to digital libraries, with special emphasis on preservation and access issues. SGML is an international standard (ISO 8879) designed to promote text interchange. It is used to define markup languages, which can then encode the logical structure and content of any so-defined document. The connection between SGML and the traditional concerns of preservation and access may not be immediately apparent, but the use of descriptive markup tools such as SGML is crucial to the quality and long-term accessibility of digitized materials. Beginning with a general exploration of digital formats for preservation and access, the report provides a staged technical tutorial on the features and uses of SGML. The tutorial covers SGML and related standards, SGML Document Type Definitions in current use, and related projects now under development. A tiered metadata model is described that could incorporate SGML along with other standards to facilitate discovery and retrieval of digital documents.
    [Show full text]
  • Information Processing — Text and Office Systems — Standard Generalized Markup Language (SGML)
    International Standard •3 8879 / INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR STANDARDIZATION»ME)KflyHAPOflHAR OPrAHU3AL|Ufl FIO CTAHflAPTH3ALlMM»ORGANISATION INTERNATIONALE DE NORMALISATION Information processing — Text and office systems — Standard Generalized Markup Language (SGML) Traitement de /'information — Systemes bureautiques — Langage standard generalise de balisage f SGML) First edition — 1986-10-15 Adopted for Use by the Federol Government FIPS PUB 152 See Notice on Inside Front Cover —JK— 468 . A8A3 //152 1988 UDC 681.3.06 Ref. No. ISO 8879-1986 (E) Descriptors : data processing, documentation, logical structure, programming (computers), artificial languages, programming languages Foreword ISO (the International Organization for Standardization) is a worldwide federation of national standards bodies (ISO member bodies). The work of preparing International Standards is normally carried out through ISO technical committees. Each member body interested in a subject for which a technical committee has been established has the right to be represented on that committee. International organizations, govern¬ mental and non-governmental, in liaison with ISO, also take part in the work. Draft International Standards adopted by the technical committees are circulated to the member bodies for approval before their acceptance as International Standards by the ISO Council. They are approved in accordance with ISO procedures requiring at least 75 % approval by the member bodies voting. International Standard ISO 8879 was prepared by Technical Committee ISO/TC 97, In¬ formation processing systems. Users should note that all International Standards undergo revision from time to time and that any reference made herein to any other International Standard implies its latest edition, unless otherwise stated. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS &' TECHNOLOGY Research Mormatksn Center Gakhersburg, MD £06^9 This standard has been adopted for Federal Government use.
    [Show full text]
  • Modularization of XHTML in XML Schema Modularization of XHTML™ in XML Schema
    Modularization of XHTML in XML Schema Modularization of XHTML™ in XML Schema Modularization of XHTML™ in XML Schema W3C Working Draft - 22 March 2001 This version: http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/WD-xhtml-m12n-schema-20010322 (Single HTML file [p.1] , PostScript version, PDF version, ZIP archive, or Gzip’d TAR archive) Latest version: http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml-m12n-schema Editors: Daniel Austin, Mozquito Technologies AG Shane McCarron, Applied Testing and Technology Copyright ©2001 W3C® (MIT, INRIA, Keio), All Rights Reserved. W3C liability, trademark, document use and software licensing rules apply. Abstract This document describes a methodology for the modularization of XHTML using XML Schema. Modularization of XHTML allows document authors to modify and extend XHTML in a conformant way. Status of This Document This section describes the status of this document at the time of its publication. Other documents may supersede this document. The latest status of this document series is maintained at the W3C. This is the first public "Working Draft" of "Modularization of XHTML in XML Schema" for review by members of the W3C and other interested parties in the general public. It is a stand-alone document to ease its review. Once the methodology described in this document become mature, it will be integrated into a future document forthcoming from the HTML Working Group. This document is still in its early stage, and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. Publication of this Working Draft does not imply endorsement by the W3C, and it is inappropriate to use W3C Working Drafts as reference material or to cite them as other than "work in progress".
    [Show full text]
  • HTML 4.0 Specification
    HTML 4.0 Specification PR-HTML40-971107 HTML 4.0 Specification W3C Proposed Recommendation 7-Nov-1997 This version: http://www.w3.org/TR/PR-html40-971107/ Latest version: http://www.w3.org/TR/PR-html40/ Previous version: http://www.w3.org/TR/WD-html40-970917/ Editors: Dave Raggett <[email protected]> Arnaud Le Hors <[email protected]> Ian Jacobs <[email protected]> Abstract This specification defines the HyperText Markup Language (HTML), version 4.0, the publishing language of the World Wide Web. In addition to the text, multimedia, and hyperlink features of the previous versions of HTML, HTML 4.0 supports more multimedia options, scripting languages, style sheets, better printing facilities, and documents that are more accessible to users with disabilities. HTML 4.0 also takes great strides towards the internationalization of documents, with the goal of making the Web truly World Wide. HTML 4.0 is an SGML application conforming to International Standard ISO 8879 -- Standard Generalized Markup Language [ISO8879] [p.319] ). As an SGML application, the syntax of conforming HTML 4.0 documents is defined by the combination of the SGML declaration [p.247] and the document type definition [p.249] (DTD). This specification defines the intended interpretation of HTML 4.0 elements and adds syntax constraints that may not be expressed by the DTD alone. Status of this document This is a stable document derived from the 17 September working draft of the HTML 4.0 specification. This document has been produced as part of the W3C HTML Activity. The publication of this document does not imply endorsement by the Consortium’s staff or Member organizations.
    [Show full text]
  • Doctype Switching in Modern Browsers
    Thomas Vervik, July 2007 Doctype switching in modern browsers Summary: Some modern browsers have two rendering modes. Quirk mode renders an HTML document like older browsers used to do it, e.g. Netscape 4, Internet Explorer 4 and 5. Standard mode renders a page according to W3C recommendations. Depending on the document type declaration present in the HTML document, the browser will switch into either quirk mode, almost standard or standard mode. If there is no document type declaration present, the browser will switch into quirk mode. This paragraph summaries this article. I will explain how the main browsers on the marked today determine which rendering mode to use when rendering the (x)html documents they receive. I have tested nearly all my assertions in Internet Explorer 6, Firefix 2 and Opera 9.02. The validation is done at the official W3 validation page http://validator.w3.org. Some of my assertions are tested using pages on the net. This is done when testing the media types ‘text/html’ and ‘application/xhtml+xml’with html and xhtml with both legal and illegal syntax. My previous article was full of vague assertions and even things that were directly wrong. This should not be the case in this article where nearly all the assertions are tested. One section I should be humble about is the ‘Doctype dissection’. Finding good sources decribing these in more detail than pages and books just briefly describing their syntax proved hard, but I have done my best and have also described in the text which section I’m certain about and the one I am more uncertain about.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of XML on Library Procedures and Services
    The impact of XML on library procedures and services Eric van Herwijnen January 16, 2000 CERN, Geneva, Switzerland Contents 16/01/2000 1. Introduction open-2000-067 2. XML and its family 3. XML as the lingua franca for electronic document delivery 4. XML as a general purpose exchange language 5. XML as a language for describing data 6. Conclusions Notes Introduction In recent years, digital technologies such as the World Wide Web have revolutionized the way that libraries are used and organized. For example, in the High Energy Physics world, the omnipresence of the TeX text processing system and the availability of the Internet have achieved that all preprints are now electronically distributed and retrieved via the Internet. This development took both publishers and libraries by surprise. Now that the distribution of information is being taken care of by the HEP community, scientific publishers are forcing themselves out of this market by continuing to increase their journal prices. The organization of peer review is the only role left for the publisher and even this role could soon be taken away from them. Paul Ginsparg already claimed in 1994 that "certain physics journals currently play NO role whatsoever for physicists. Their primary role seems to be to provide a revenue stream to publishers, a revenue stream invisibly siphoned from overhead on research contracts through library systems..." If there are no more printed journals to store on shelves, the role of the library in the preprint publication process also becomes less clear. Since preprints are stored in full-text form, servers offer very good search capabilities, as good as those of a conventional library.
    [Show full text]
  • Framework for a Music Markup Language Jacques Steyn Consultant PO Box 14097 Hatfield 0028 South Africa +27 72 129 4740 [email protected]
    Framework for a music markup language Jacques Steyn Consultant PO Box 14097 Hatfield 0028 South Africa +27 72 129 4740 [email protected] ABSTRACT Montgomery), FlowML (Bert Schiettecatte), MusicML (Jeroen van Rotterdam), MusiXML (Gerd Castan), and Objects and processes of music that would be marked with MusicXML (Michael Good), all of which focus on subsets a markup language need to be demarcated before a markup of CWN. ChordML (Gustavo Frederico) focuses on simple language can be designed. This paper investigates issues to lyrics and chords of music. MML (Jacques Steyn) is the be considered for the design of an XML-based general only known attempt to address music objects and events in music markup language. Most present efforts focus on general. CWN (Common Western Notation), yet that system addresses only a fraction of the domain of music. It is In this paper I will investigate the possible scope of music argued that a general music markup language should objects and processes that need to be considered for a consider more than just CWN. A framework for such a comprehensive or general music markup language that is comprehensive general music markup language is XML-based. To begin with, I propose the following basic proposed. Such a general markup language should consist requirements for such a general music markup language. of modules that could be appended to core modules on a 2 REQUIREMENTS FOR A MUSIC MARKUP needs basis. LANGUAGE Keywords A general music markup language should Music Markup Language, music modules, music processes, S music objects, XML conform to XML requirements as published by the W3C 1 INTRODUCTION S use common English music terminology for The use of markup languages exploded after the element and attribute names introduction of the World Wide Web, particularly HTML, S which is a very simple application of SGML (Standard address intrinsic as well as extrinsic music objects General Markup Language).
    [Show full text]
  • An SGML Environment for STEP
    An SGML Environment for STEP Usa Phillips Joshua Lubeli U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Technology Administration National Institute of Standards and Technology Gaithersburg, MD 20899 NIST NISTIR 5515 An SGML Environment for STEP Lisa Phillips Joshua Lubell U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Technology Administration National Institute of Standards and Technology Gaithersburg, MD 20899 June 22, 1994 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Ronald H. Brown, Secretary TECHNOLOGY ADMINISTRATION Mary L. Good, Under Secretary for Techrwlogy NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY Arati Prabhakar, Director Table of Contents 1 Introduction 1 2 The Application Protocol Development Environment 2 3 SGML Basics 4 3.1 Document Type Definition 4 3.2 SGML Document Instance 5 4 Why SGML? 7 4.1 Document Shareability 7 4.2 Structure-based Editing 7 4.3 Automatic Generation of Text 8 4.4 Information Integrity 8 4.5 “Intelligent” Documents 8 4.6 Increased Potential for Collaboration 9 4.7 Reduction In Document Preparation Time 9 5 The SGML Environment for STEP 10 5.1 Essential Components 11 5.1.1 DTD Parser 12 5.1.2 Document Instance Parser 12 5.1.3 STEP-Customized SGML Authoring Tool 12 5.1.4 Conversion of Legacy Documents to SGML 13 5.1.5 Translation from SGML to a Publishable Format 14 5.2 Additional Components 14 5.2.1 Multi-Document Queries and Browsing 15 5.2.2 Remote Access Services 16 5.2.3 Multi-user Editing 17 6 Conclusion 18 6.1 Status of the SGML Environment and Near-term Future Plans 18 6.2 Long-term Plans for the SGML Environment 19 7 References 20 8 Glossary 22 Appendix A: The STEP DTDs 24 DRAFT 1 ' »3S(, .
    [Show full text]
  • (V1) - Text Processing: Office and Publishing Systems Interface
    Committee: (V1) - Text Processing: Office and Publishing Systems Interface National Designation Title (Click here to purchase standards) ISO/IEC Document V1 :[] Information technology - Document Container File -- Part 1: Core CD 21340-1 :[] Information technology - Extensions of Office Open XML File Formats - Part 1: CD 30114-1 Guidelines :[] Information technology - Extensions of Office Open XML - Part 2: Character CD 30114-2 Repertoire Checking INCITS/ISO 8879:1986:[R2009] Information Processing - Text and Office Systems - Standard Generalized Markup IS 8879:1986 INCITS/ISO/IEC 8879:1986/AM Information Processing - Text and Office Systems - Standard Generalized Markup IS 8879:1986/AM1:1988 1:1988:[2010] Language (SGML) - Amendment 1 INCITS/ISO/IEC 8879:1986/COR Information Processing - Text and Office Systems - Standard Generalized Markup IS 8879:1986/COR 1:1996 1:1996:[2010] Language (SGML) TECHNICAL CORRIGENDUM 1 INCITS/ISO/IEC 8879:1986/COR Information Processing - Text and Office Systems - Standard Generalized Markup IS 8879:1986/COR 2:1999 2:1999:[2010] Language (SGML) TECHNICAL CORRIGENDUM 2 INCITS 207-:1991[S2012] Alternate Keyboard Arrangement for Alphanumeric Machines N/A Created: 11/16/2014 Page 1 of 11 Committee: (V1) - Text Processing: Office and Publishing Systems Interface National Designation Title (Click here to purchase standards) ISO/IEC Document INCITS/ISO/IEC 9541-2:2012:[2013] Information technology - Font information interchange - Part 2: Interchange format IS 9541-2:2012 INCITS/ISO/IEC 9541-3:2013:[2013] Information
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the Hypertext Standardization Workshop January 16-18, 1990 National Institute of Standards and Technology
    NIST Special Publication 500-178 A111Q3 3fiTSbfl . v^uiripuc^r Systems Proceedings of the Hypertext Technology Standardization Workshop U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE January 16-18, 1990 National Institute of Standards and National Institute of Standards Technology and Technology Nisr Judi Moline NIST * Dan Benigni PUBLICATIONS Jean Baronas NATIONAL INSTrrUTE OF STANDARDS & TECHNOLOGY Reseso'di Mormatkm Center Gakhersburg, MD 20899 DATE DUE . _ r Demco, Inc. 38-.293 NIST Special Publication 500-178 Proceedings of the Hypertext Standardization Workshop January 16-18, 1990 National Institute of Standards and Technology Judi Moline, Dan Benigni, and Jean Baronas, Editors Hypertext Competence Project National Computer Systems Laboratory National Institute of Standards and Technology Gaithersburg, MD 20899 March 1990 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Robert A. Mosbacher, Secretary NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY John W. Lyons, Director Reports on Computer Systems Technology The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NiST) (formerly the National Bureau of Standards) has a unique responsibility for computer systems technology within the Federal government. NIST's National Computer Systems Laboratory (NCSL) develops standards and guidelines, provides technical assistance, and conducts research for computers and related telecommunications systems to achieve more effective utilization of Federal information technology resources. NCSL's responsibilities include development of technical, management, physical, and administrative standards and guidelines for the cost-effective security and privacy of sensitive unclassified information processed in Federal computers. NCSL assists agencies in developing security plans and in improving computer security awareness train- ing. This Special Publication 500 series reports NCSL research and guidelines to Federal agencies as well as to organizations in industry, government, and academia.
    [Show full text]