Introduction, Internet and Web Basics, XHTML and HTML
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Just Another Perl Hack Neil Bowers1 Canon Research Centre Europe
Weblint: Just Another Perl Hack Neil Bowers1 Canon Research Centre Europe Abstract Weblint is a utility for checking the syntax and style of HTML pages. It was inspired by lint [15], which performs a similar function for C and C++ programmers. Weblint does not aspire to be a strict SGML validator, but to provide helpful comments for humans. The importance of quality assurance for web sites is introduced, and one particular area, validation of HTML, is described in more detail. The bulk of the paper is devoted to weblint: what it is, how it is used, and the design and implementation of the current development version. 1. Introduction The conclusion opens with a summary of the information and opinions given in this paper. A Web sites are becoming an increasingly critical part of selection of the lessons learned over the last four years how many companies do business. For many companies is given, followed by plans for the future, and related web sites are their business. It is therefore critical that ideas. owners of web sites perform regular testing and analysis, to ensure quality of service. 2. Web Site Quality Assurance There are many different checks and analyses which The following are some of the questions you should be you can run on a site. For example, how usable is your asking yourself if you have a web presence. I have site when accessed via a modem? An incomplete list of limited the list to those points which are relevant to similar analyses are given at the start of Section 2. -
Web Protocols UR What? URI Syntax Internationalisation
CS314 - 29 UR what? Web Protocols ! URI: Uniform Resource Identifier ! URI, URN, URL " Uniquely identifies a data entity " ! Internationalisation Obeys a specific syntax " schemeName:specificStuff ! Role of HTML and XML ! URN: Uniform Resource Name ! HTTP and HTTPS " A URI that only names something " interacting via the Web " Example: urn:isbn:0-534-38317-3 ! URL: Uniform Resource Locator " A URI that points to an actual resource " Example: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/URL 1 2 URI syntax Internationalisation ! The Unicode standard defines character sets for any URI = scheme ":" hier-part script [ "?" query ] [ "#" fragment ] " variable length character codes, usually encoded in bytes in UTF-8 format ! The hierarchical part can start with // and uses / to separate components. There are other reserved " 8-bit ASCII is a proper subset of UTF-8 characters ! Internationalising DNS names, URIs and email addresses in UTF-8 is not simple http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/URL " Yet most people in the world have names like Fältström, scheme top of hierarchy (note reversal - next next name DNS writes right to left!) level level ! (DNS is case-independent but URI is case-sensitive) internationalised content and interaction 3 4 *ML *ML parsers ! In 1969, three IBMers invented GML (Generalised ! Strictly speaking, a pure SGML parser can parse Markup Language) HTML, XML or XHTML ! In the early 1980s it became SGML (Standard GML) ! In practice, HTML is written sloppily with proprietary ! Around 1990, Tim Berners-Lee and Robert Cailliau extensions invented -
Torbjorn Borison
Object Synchronisation and Security for Mobile Communication Devices By Torbjörn Borison Royal Institute of Technology Kungliga Tekniska Högskolan 2001-09-20 Examiner and academic Prof. Gerald Maguire Supervisor: Department of Teleinformatics Royal Institute of Technology Corporate Supervisor: Johan Hedin Ericsson Radio System AB Abstract The main objective of this master’s thesis project was to investigate and find solutions to the problem of how to combine the SyncML synchronisation specification with object security and thus protection of personal information, such as contacts and calendar entries in mobile devices. SyncML is a new synchronisation specification agreed upon by major device developers (Ericsson, Palm, Motorola, etc.) and the major synchronisation server developers (Starfish, Puma, fusionOne, etc.). It is independent of transport (HTTP, WSP, or OBEX) platform, operating system, and application and simplifies synchronisation of personal information between dissimilar SyncML supportive devices. SyncML compliant devices are fully capable of synchronising information with a third party operated Internet based server and a desktop computer. This allows us to access, up-date and maintain information independent of Intranets or geographical position. However, synchronising and storing confidential personal information on an third party operated Internet based server entails weaknesses in our personal information security. Even if transport and storage security are used, how secure is the server where this information is stored since this server has the highest probability of being attacked. Can we really trust that an employee or other person with valid appropriated administrators access to the storage facility with the appropriate knowledge, working together with the third party server operator, won’t try to access our stored information? To prevent this, the personal information’s confidentiality must be guaranteed before the information leaves the device. -
Information Processing — Text and Office Systems — Standard Generalized Markup Language (SGML)
International Standard •3 8879 / INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR STANDARDIZATION»ME)KflyHAPOflHAR OPrAHU3AL|Ufl FIO CTAHflAPTH3ALlMM»ORGANISATION INTERNATIONALE DE NORMALISATION Information processing — Text and office systems — Standard Generalized Markup Language (SGML) Traitement de /'information — Systemes bureautiques — Langage standard generalise de balisage f SGML) First edition — 1986-10-15 Adopted for Use by the Federol Government FIPS PUB 152 See Notice on Inside Front Cover —JK— 468 . A8A3 //152 1988 UDC 681.3.06 Ref. No. ISO 8879-1986 (E) Descriptors : data processing, documentation, logical structure, programming (computers), artificial languages, programming languages Foreword ISO (the International Organization for Standardization) is a worldwide federation of national standards bodies (ISO member bodies). The work of preparing International Standards is normally carried out through ISO technical committees. Each member body interested in a subject for which a technical committee has been established has the right to be represented on that committee. International organizations, govern¬ mental and non-governmental, in liaison with ISO, also take part in the work. Draft International Standards adopted by the technical committees are circulated to the member bodies for approval before their acceptance as International Standards by the ISO Council. They are approved in accordance with ISO procedures requiring at least 75 % approval by the member bodies voting. International Standard ISO 8879 was prepared by Technical Committee ISO/TC 97, In¬ formation processing systems. Users should note that all International Standards undergo revision from time to time and that any reference made herein to any other International Standard implies its latest edition, unless otherwise stated. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS &' TECHNOLOGY Research Mormatksn Center Gakhersburg, MD £06^9 This standard has been adopted for Federal Government use. -
DISSERTATION APPROVAL the Abstract And
DISSERTATION APPROVAL The abstract and dissertation of Emerson Murphy-Hill for the Doctor of Philoso- phy in Computer Science were presented on February 26, 2009, and accepted by the dissertation committee and the doctoral program. COMMITTEE APPROVALS: Andrew P. Black, Chair Stephane´ Ducasse Mark Jones Susan Palmiter Suresh Singh Douglas Hall Representative of the Office of Graduate Studies DOCTORAL PROGRAM APPROVAL: Wu-chi Feng, Director Computer Science Ph.D. Program ABSTRACT An abstract of the dissertation of Emerson Murphy-Hill for the Doctor of Philoso- phy in Computer Science presented February 26, 2009. Title: Programmer Friendly Refactoring Tools Tools that perform semi-automated refactoring are currently under-utilized by programmers. If more programmers adopted refactoring tools, software projects could make enormous productivity gains. However, as more advanced refactor- ing tools are designed, a great chasm widens between how the tools must be used and how programmers want to use them. This dissertation begins to bridge this chasm by exposing usability guidelines to direct the design of the next generation of programmer-friendly refactoring tools, so that refactoring tools fit the way program- mers behave, not vice-versa. PROGRAMMER FRIENDLY REFACTORING TOOLS by EMERSON MURPHY-HILL A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in COMPUTER SCIENCE Portland State University 2009 To Tetey Acknowledgements This research could not have been accomplished without the help of countless others. First and foremost, thanks to my advisor, Andrew P. Black, for always providing en- lightening guidance and advice. Thanks to the members of my thesis committee, each of whom contributed to this work: Stephane´ Ducasse, Doug Hall, Mark Jones, Susan Palmiter, and Suresh Singh. -
Adobe Golive CS2 Fans Say Adobe Golive Is Better Than Dreamweaver, Yet Few Web Designers Use It
Adobe GoLive CS2 Fans say Adobe GoLive is better than Dreamweaver, yet few web designers use it. What does the CS2 version have that can challenge this hegemony? the assisted browsers ac web designers have had a love-hate relationship with faster and are usable with little effort by GoLive for a long time. Many have chosen to hate it from and screenreaders disabled web surfers use. - the anorexic afar, never having tried it Dreamweaver, despite its GoLive CS 2 is a godsend for anyone frustrated by in Windows-eque interface and inferior feature set, has somehow CSS positioning tools and microscopic range of templates managed to grab all the thunder in the market. Others have GoLive CS and Dreamweaver. In typical Mac fashion, you can just chosen to hate it gradually, watching as Adobe has slowly drag sets of CSS layouts straight into your webpage and GoLive than stamped its own interface and ideas on the once promising, will configure stylesheets and coding appropriately. Better beautiful, innovative and Mac-esque GoLive CyberStudio. But there templates, this allows you to combine CSS layouts to create your are a happy few, a loyal band of GoLive users who have stuck own custom layout without having to know coding. with it and loved it since those heady OS 9 days when it was But does GoLive actually display the page correctly in its easily the best package available on any platform. Now the latest traditional editing mode, a deficiency that made GoLive CS hard - - and definitely the greatest GoLive is out and it looks set to to use with true CSS layouts? No. -
Modularization of XHTML in XML Schema Modularization of XHTML™ in XML Schema
Modularization of XHTML in XML Schema Modularization of XHTML™ in XML Schema Modularization of XHTML™ in XML Schema W3C Working Draft - 22 March 2001 This version: http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/WD-xhtml-m12n-schema-20010322 (Single HTML file [p.1] , PostScript version, PDF version, ZIP archive, or Gzip’d TAR archive) Latest version: http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml-m12n-schema Editors: Daniel Austin, Mozquito Technologies AG Shane McCarron, Applied Testing and Technology Copyright ©2001 W3C® (MIT, INRIA, Keio), All Rights Reserved. W3C liability, trademark, document use and software licensing rules apply. Abstract This document describes a methodology for the modularization of XHTML using XML Schema. Modularization of XHTML allows document authors to modify and extend XHTML in a conformant way. Status of This Document This section describes the status of this document at the time of its publication. Other documents may supersede this document. The latest status of this document series is maintained at the W3C. This is the first public "Working Draft" of "Modularization of XHTML in XML Schema" for review by members of the W3C and other interested parties in the general public. It is a stand-alone document to ease its review. Once the methodology described in this document become mature, it will be integrated into a future document forthcoming from the HTML Working Group. This document is still in its early stage, and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. Publication of this Working Draft does not imply endorsement by the W3C, and it is inappropriate to use W3C Working Drafts as reference material or to cite them as other than "work in progress". -
Doctype Switching in Modern Browsers
Thomas Vervik, July 2007 Doctype switching in modern browsers Summary: Some modern browsers have two rendering modes. Quirk mode renders an HTML document like older browsers used to do it, e.g. Netscape 4, Internet Explorer 4 and 5. Standard mode renders a page according to W3C recommendations. Depending on the document type declaration present in the HTML document, the browser will switch into either quirk mode, almost standard or standard mode. If there is no document type declaration present, the browser will switch into quirk mode. This paragraph summaries this article. I will explain how the main browsers on the marked today determine which rendering mode to use when rendering the (x)html documents they receive. I have tested nearly all my assertions in Internet Explorer 6, Firefix 2 and Opera 9.02. The validation is done at the official W3 validation page http://validator.w3.org. Some of my assertions are tested using pages on the net. This is done when testing the media types ‘text/html’ and ‘application/xhtml+xml’with html and xhtml with both legal and illegal syntax. My previous article was full of vague assertions and even things that were directly wrong. This should not be the case in this article where nearly all the assertions are tested. One section I should be humble about is the ‘Doctype dissection’. Finding good sources decribing these in more detail than pages and books just briefly describing their syntax proved hard, but I have done my best and have also described in the text which section I’m certain about and the one I am more uncertain about. -
Gerry E. Mayer 604.314.7541 [email protected] PROFESSIONAL PROFILE
gerry e. mayer 604.314.7541 [email protected] www.gemdigitalmedia.com PROFESSIONAL PROFILE Interactive and web design professional with more than 10 years practical experience and 6 as a post secondary instructor, in web design, web development, digital imaging, Flash development, video and motion graphics, and animation. Experience also includes managing, the development, preparation and facilitation of courses in Professional Development, and Basic English Essay Writing. Strong focus on maintaining creative excellence and creating positive relationships for both internal and external clients from within the public, private and educational sectors. PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE 2011-current Surrey Connect – Surrey School District – Surrey, BC Web Communication Specialist ▪ Support and train teachers in the use of Blackboard Learn 9.1 LMS ▪ Assist in administering Blackboard Learn 9.1 ▪ Maintain and support Blackboard LMS course shells ▪ Develop web solutions for Surrey Connect ▪ Create and deliver Blackboard training workshops ▪ Support and development of Social Media solutions - surreyconnectnews.com ▪ Support for digital media solutions ▪ Create and maintain Google analytics, AdWords and Facebook advertising ▪ Administer and support Lynda.com ▪ Support Tell me more - language LMS 2008-2011 Douglas College – New Westminster, BC Web Designer § Responsible for development and maintenance of corporate website using CMS – Active 9.0 (formerly Ironpoint) § Developed and implemented new site Design including Information architecture, prototyping, -
Sublimelinter Documentation Release 4.0.0
SublimeLinter Documentation Release 4.0.0 The SublimeLinter Community Sep 16, 2021 User Documentation 1 Installation 3 2 Settings 5 2.1 Settings stack...............................................5 2.2 Styles (colors)..............................................5 2.3 Project settings..............................................6 2.4 Settings Expansion............................................6 3 Linter Settings 9 3.1 args....................................................9 3.2 disable..................................................9 3.3 env.................................................... 10 3.4 excludes................................................. 10 3.5 executable................................................ 10 3.6 filter_errors................................................ 10 3.7 lint_mode................................................. 11 3.8 python.................................................. 11 3.9 selector.................................................. 11 3.10 styles................................................... 12 3.11 working_dir............................................... 13 4 Customization 15 4.1 Context Menu.............................................. 15 4.2 Key bindings............................................... 15 5 Troubleshooting 17 5.1 Debug mode............................................... 17 5.2 The linter doesn’t work!......................................... 17 5.3 Debugging PATH problems....................................... 17 6 Creating a gutter theme 19 7 Creating a -
Photoshop and Imageready with Golive and Dreamweaver
WEB 1 PHOTOSHOP AND IMAGEREADY WITH GOLIVE AND DREAMWEAVER IN THIS CHAPTER Beyond ImageReady: GoLive and Dreamweaver 2 Exporting Images from Photoshop and ImageReady for HTML Editors 2 Importing Images into GoLive 7 Importing Images into Dreamweaver 14 2 Web 1: Photoshop and ImageReady with GoLive and Dre a m w e a v e r BEYOND IMAGEREADY: GOLIVE 1 AND DREAMWEAVER For more detailed information and Adobe GoLive and Macromedia Dreamweaver are con- to download a working demo of sidered “what you see is what you get” (WYSIWYG) applica- Adobe GoLive and Macromedia tions. They enable you to create more complex Web sites Dreamweaver, go to their Web than you can with only ImageReady and give you the flexibil- sites at www.adobe.com and ity to create a layout on a grid—just click and drag your www.macromedia.com. visual elements around on the page. With this click-and-drag approach, beginners never have to look at a piece of HTML code to create an attractive Web page. You can also import other media elements, such as Flash, Shockwave, and QuickTime movies, as well as ImageReady slice elements and Photoshop or ImageReady images and animations. ImageReady is a great start to laying out a page design, how- ever, and you can easily import slice elements from it into either GoLive or Dreamweaver. A quick overview of using Photoshop and ImageReady images or animations in these applications is covered later in this chapter. What’s more important to note is that GoLive and Dreamweaver offer much more in the way of site management tools. -
Guatewireless.Org
12/5/2015 Top 50 Herramientas Propietarias y sus Alternativas Opensource ← Guatewireless.org Guatewireless.org Acerca del Sitio Contactame Glosario Ayuda e Ideas para el administrador de sistemas Linux, Bitcoins, Redes Popularity Contest Plugin para WordPress Tecnologia Software Top 50 Herramientas Propietarias y sus Alternativas Opensource « Amarok: Modulo Python Kdecore El ciclo de Ubuntu 9.04 Jaunty Jackalope inicia » Top 50 Herramientas Propietarias y sus Alternativas Opensource 4 10 Nov 2008 | Software Tags: internet explorer · por supuesto · sistemas operativos de windows · software propietario Me gusta 0 Tweet 8 Desde que tengo memoria estoy acostumbrado a utilizar herramientas de compañias como Adobe, Microsoft, Symantec, etc. El hecho es que estas herramientas aunque sean Buscar muy buenas tambien son propietarias, y a simple vista uno puede pensar que la ventaja de las herramientas de codigo libre es su precio casi nulo, lo cual es tan solo un minimo de las grandes ventajas que tenemos al utilizar software libre. Al contrario de la experiencia de que el software propietario viene con los límites que Recomendacion del Editor mantiene la experiencia del usuario restringida. › Si usted cree que su herramienta con la cual trabaja actualmente es lo unico que existe los Coleccion de claves router Turbonett Claro cincuenta programas propietarios a continuacion considerados como de facto en el › mercado se muestran junto con sus alternativas de código abierto. APN TIGO – GPRS MMS WAP Internet 3G El caso es que usted evalue los pros y contras de su herramienta usual y vea que el mundo EDGE Manual de Configuracion del floss le brinda alternativas libres con las cuales puede hacer la misma tarea de la forma › usual o incluso mejor.