DISSERTATION APPROVAL the Abstract And
DISSERTATION APPROVAL The abstract and dissertation of Emerson Murphy-Hill for the Doctor of Philoso- phy in Computer Science were presented on February 26, 2009, and accepted by the dissertation committee and the doctoral program. COMMITTEE APPROVALS: Andrew P. Black, Chair Stephane´ Ducasse Mark Jones Susan Palmiter Suresh Singh Douglas Hall Representative of the Office of Graduate Studies DOCTORAL PROGRAM APPROVAL: Wu-chi Feng, Director Computer Science Ph.D. Program ABSTRACT An abstract of the dissertation of Emerson Murphy-Hill for the Doctor of Philoso- phy in Computer Science presented February 26, 2009. Title: Programmer Friendly Refactoring Tools Tools that perform semi-automated refactoring are currently under-utilized by programmers. If more programmers adopted refactoring tools, software projects could make enormous productivity gains. However, as more advanced refactor- ing tools are designed, a great chasm widens between how the tools must be used and how programmers want to use them. This dissertation begins to bridge this chasm by exposing usability guidelines to direct the design of the next generation of programmer-friendly refactoring tools, so that refactoring tools fit the way program- mers behave, not vice-versa. PROGRAMMER FRIENDLY REFACTORING TOOLS by EMERSON MURPHY-HILL A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in COMPUTER SCIENCE Portland State University 2009 To Tetey Acknowledgements This research could not have been accomplished without the help of countless others. First and foremost, thanks to my advisor, Andrew P. Black, for always providing en- lightening guidance and advice. Thanks to the members of my thesis committee, each of whom contributed to this work: Stephane´ Ducasse, Doug Hall, Mark Jones, Susan Palmiter, and Suresh Singh.
[Show full text]