DOCSLIB.ORG

Verdugo Mountains L L a A

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Verdugo Mountains L L a A 118°21'0"W 118°20'0"W 118°19'0"W 118°18'0"W 118°17'0"W 118°16'0"W 118°15'0"W 118°14'0"W 118°13'0"W C ARL O TTA L B F S OO T N DUNSMORE Y THIL PARK C Verdugo Mountains L L A A G T U N N A BLVD U C J T V V Y U S A A T N E VILLAGE L W R D AV L NEW YORK AV E D 0.5 N PARK PENROSE ST W O A 34°14'0"N H O T 34°14'0"N O L O V S AV L AV OS T A R 1.6 A E B T T E T UNSMORE U E YORK D R R I 1.9 N F A M T N A 2.2 H NIA L 1.5 O A U A T C N Y V N O L EW U N M LU YL T S W 0.5 A 1.1 Y 3.1 V RESCENTA PENN MT LA TUNA C N V O CRESCENTA VALLEY R 0.5 I O R E T AL COUNTY PARK S A C 0.9 E R R A T OE L 2.1 E N B L D D T L A N 1.0 U A 0.4 M L H A G Y L O S O E C M T W P N D M TR 210 T O O S R O E L E AN Y 2256 U 1.0 AR A 1.1 0.6 K G A W V D K W O O D S H T I N G M T W O 0.7 1.2 N D I Y R H D W O I N 0.7 R O 2.4 H 34°13'0"N L S W C Y D O SAN FERNANDO LY N N N 34°13'0"N L O A O O O Y L C 3126 O Y D W L P H N O G U A A O IN L N IT U M C W WH T D A E AV C I I L N R R A B O V W A Y V Y AN A C N RE YO W U 0.4 N 0.5 Mc L V A C EMONT D E C R N O D O N OS O CAMP BRACE WILDWOOD S O R U Y W D R N MAX STRAUS Y N G E CANYON R 0.2 CANYON PARK O C A L 1815 D ARD N Y O L STOUGH N ENGLEH E PARK Y N S E H O C A PARK 1.3 H I H C R D T L EY JEAN ST B O E ROADVI S 2995 N 0.2 O S U EW V VERDUGO MOUNTAINS 0.6 W M T D A D W OPEN SPACE PRESERVE R L Y I T W C U L O A BEL AIRE 2.0 U N N MONTROSE ER C NYO N PARK E A 0.6 T L D 0.6 C PARK R R R D D E A R N E S L I Y C D Y S W C O O R R K D E G T A S KROQ N U T V B T 34°12'0"N D U A R 2.6 OAKMONT N TONGVA PEAK 34°12'0"N 5 R L YO R A N D C A C E C H PARK D LUB A V B Y O N V EL A R O RESERVOIR 3 O B T Y 2656 W N N E IRE D M U A PALM Y A L C W O U R PARK E S ' N T C D D O L M R I Y EAUD L Y H N B B 2.5 N RY HIKING ADVISORY C D 0.9 HIKING ESSENTIALS A O N DEBRIS SU C N Y O R 1.5 BASIN N R D NSE ELMWOOD D A T L N A 2.3 H D R T DEBRIS A C M HELISPOT 1. Know your limitations R CA BRAND PARK T W A A B BASIN R B Y Y V B 24 A NYON D O R O 2. Bring a companion; 1. Map of the area R A G H E SA DEBRIS U M N F AGNOLI BASIN D never hike alone O 2. Compass R M IVE AV R MT. THOM GLORIETTA E P R OL U T H M E 2 3. Stay on the trail 3. Flashlights NAN S O T W PARK Y V 2.1 R Y DO 0.75 D SPORTS 4. Stay hydrated - drink plenty of water 4. Sunglasses ROSSMOYNE U RESERVOIR A N COMPLEX RD 0.8 E 5. Protect yourself from the sun 0.2 5. Extra food and water M B D OUNTA DEBRIS D L V BASIN N 6. Tell someone where you are going A L BL A 6. Extra clothing 0.2 R 0.8 B K R N ON ANYON A IN B E C and when you plan to return B Y R T 2.1 7. WaterproofU matches ST L A N T D B A 34°11'0"N C S 7. Bring a cellphone in case you or someone E 34°11'0"N E L R A A R 8. Pocketknife E D S F E S L R C O H in your group needs to call for help E L O SH A 9. First-aid kit V R M L D 8. NO SMOKING V I H S T A A A W E DEBRIS N Y D 9. NO CAMPFIRES C A LLEN BASIN W R A A C E 10. IN CASE OF EMERGENCY, dial 9-1-1 N YO MAYOR'S AV NSHINE N D SU R BICENTENNIAL N ANDVI R Gate E K PARK Elevation (feet) T ENNETH GR COLINA DR Y Fire Road W WES VERDUGO O V F G Drinking Water A PARK DR U Road D D R N E Picnic Area A V Access Road L H Restroom G W E I KENNETH Freeway H GL RD E DAL N Hydrant N N City Boundary O A E SA KS GL ENWOO GL Cistern Trail N BL D MOUNTAIN RD AV PA F L 34°10'0"N ERNAN Water Tank Abandoned Fire Road CIF ST OUNT 34°10'0"N NIBLEY M AI IC N BL ST DO PARK Helispot ENTRA Distance (miles) E STOCKER ST C O D G AV U 100ft Contour D Radio Site R RAN E Open Space Preserve B V GL SE EN A Park Scale OA H KS C GLENOA HELISPOT Source: Street Center Lines Copyright (C) 2002 3,000 1,500 0 3,000 KS E Thomas Bros.Maps and City of Gledale GIS data 25 A GL VY Date: January 31, 2007 Feet E GLENOAKS E E N O H AKS C 118°21'0"W 118°20'0"W 118°19'0"W 118°18'0"W 118°17'0"W 118°16'0"W 118°15'0"W 118°14'0"W 118°13'0"W 118°13'0"W 118°12'0"W 118°11'0"W 118°10'0"W 118°9'0"W 118°8'0"W 118°16'0"W 118°15'0"W 118°14'0"W San Rafael Hills San Gabriel Mountains MT. LUKENS 34°13'0"N M 34°13'0"N City of Glendale H T A W I N O N E S Y Y C A N 5074 N O Y N A Trails and Fire Roads C M 34°16'0"N T W 34°16'0"N Y S E N I A H R V e r d u g o M o u n t a i n s T Y VERDUGO BLVD E 1.7 L S a n R a f a e l H i l l s N L DESCANSO A GARDENS D V R OCEA MONTROSE DEUKMEJIAN PARK E S a n G a b r i e l M o u n t a i n s H WILDERNESS 0.2 T PARK 0.4 F O D 3040 E I M S R N TR C O AN Y O S E C O R A D CHEVY CHASE DR N G R 34°12'0"N O 34°12'0"N U M D S SAN G D 1.0 R N E E U ABRIE V S D CA L 1.0 R N N D RD T Y A RD E 0.8 P O O T Y 1.0 W S O M S N R T O W N P 2755 L A F Y O S M DI 0.1 R C E A NAGE 0.5 H LE MES E Y O N R ON MT N O M 0.2 A Y WY A M OUNT C Y C N 0.1 S R HELISPOT H R S C N A E R 0.1 K U AINS N 24 A O G 0.5 D E O L M C ERA T L T W A Y R D 0.5 M 0.3 AR N K RID D RID 2325 G A E G E E T S V M 0.5 P E Y 34°15'0"N W M 34°15'0"N R T SANTA T W A D N M 0.5 Y U 2 R H CARL G E O F RD FOOT OTT LE A 0.1 A HILL AV D Y SU YORK G L W A L L ON LO L N AV T A ER BL R E F T M EAD DR E V D T S D W D S P TO SPORTS U W O R M E S A BO L COMPLEX H O LA R CERRO NEGR DUNSMORE O L V E YLVANIA VD BO TOWER SA O A H G O NEW BL N N D T I O R A SM L R U N 0.5 K L D PENNS RD U R LANE E CA IA DU S R Gate A L YO Elevation (feet) N OT AN FER H Y L V C T A L Drinking Water Fire Road Y W E E M A 34°11'0"N V T F E 34°11'0"N SY H E Picnic Area R W Road A O M A A N N R E H ST 0.5 DG L O I C N E R R D L NT NE Restroom U I Freeway L E N I U L EMONT PE Y S AN W A S Hydrant VERDUGO S L D W City Boundary T 210 Y E N F RO E M OO Cistern MOUNTAINS CRESCE L F A I Trail A G G THILL D E L BRO U Water Tank A O E ADV G N EMERALD ISLE ELAWN R Abandoned Fire Road N I D S IEW I M O A A PARK Helispot C O R L C A G C DUNSMORE O A Distance (miles) RO U C U ST SAN AUGUSTINE Radio Site N R D PARK 100ft Contour T E R R S E MAYOR'S Y C Park CL E V BICENTENNIAL R BLVD N D UB T PARK A 0.2C E A S S M H Scale A D I E H A RD N V N C O WY R 2,400 1,200 0 2,400 O R I L D V D AN E U B FR V Feet R G ST E Y I L D R F B D V O V U 2 P I G G A E STA R U O W MO A H SAN C D F D UNTAIN R A I A G A E Y 118°16'0"W 118°15'0"W 118°14'0"W U D N V D L E A A R RD ID LEN R A N C 1.0 O AL IEW D A A A R Y LIND KENNETH C MTW R A O F G A D Y RANDV U E Multi-Use Trail Etiquette N W G D L ALE A F L R S E RIDGE TERN H T V G I W WES H KENNETH GLEND N R LENDALE D O G G G Safe use on multiple use trails requires everyone’s cooperation.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Attachment E Part 2
    Response to Correspondence from Arroyos & Foothills Conservancy Regarding the ArtCenter Master Plan Note that the emails (Attachment A) dated after April 25, 2018, were provided to the City after the end of the CEQA comment period, and, therefore, the emails and the responses below are not included in the EIR, and no response is required under CEQA. However, for sake of complete analysis and consideration of all comments submitted, the City responds herein and this document is made part of the project staff report. Response to Correspondence This correspondence with the Arroyos & Foothills Conservancy occurred in the context of the preparation of the EIR for the ArtCenter Master Plan. The formal comment letter from Arroyos & Foothills Conservancy included in this correspondence was responded to as Letter No. 6 in Section III, Response to Comments, of the April 2018 Final EIR for the ArtCenter Master Plan. The primary correspondence herein is comprised of emails between John Howell and Mickey Long discussing whether there is a wildlife corridor within the Hillside Campus, as well as emails between John Howell and CDFW regarding whether there is a wildlife corridor and whether CDFW will provide a comment letter regarding the ArtCenter Project for the Planning Commission hearing on May 9, 2018. Note that CDFW submitted a comment letter on May 9, 2018, after completion of the Draft EIR and Final EIR. The City has also provided a separate response to this late comment letter. This correspondence centers around the potential for the Hillside Campus to contribute to a wildlife corridor. The CDFW was contacted during preparation of the Final EIR to obtain specific mapping information to provide a more comprehensive description of the potential for wildlife movement within the Hillside Campus within the Final EIR.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Resources
    Preliminary Investigation B: Water Resources Prepared by: Tim Brick, Arroyo Seco Foundation The Arroyo Seco watershed is a major source of local water supply. The Arroyo Seco and its mountain watershed contribute about 40% of the water supply for Pasadena and neighboring communities. The Raymond Basin The Arroyo Seco watershed feeds the Raymond Basin aquifer, a 40 square mile groundwater basin that extends from La Canada and the San Rafael hills on the west to Santa Anita Canyon on the east, from the foothills of the San Gabriel Mountains to the Raymond fault, a seven mile seismic feature, which runs along the boundary between Pasadena and South Pasadena and then extends out through San Marino and Arcadia to Santa Anita Canyon on the east. The groundwater basin is recharged by the Arroyo Seco, a tributary of the Los Angeles River, and by Eaton Canyon, Santa Anita Canyon and other streams in the watershed of the San Gabriel River. The Arroyo Seco stream contributes approximately one third of the natural replenishment of the aquifer. The long-term average yield of the Raymond Basin is about 30,000 acre-feet per year. Pumping rights in the Raymond Basin are adjudicated, i.e. determined by a court order, and managed by the Raymond Basin Management Board. The goal of the basin management program is to ensure a safe yield which will balance extraction with natural replenishment. Sixteen pumpers have rights to pump from the Raymond Basin. Three major subareas make up the aquifer: the Monk Hill subarea, which underlies La Canada and Northwest Pasadena, the larger Pasadena subarea, which underlies Pasadena and Altadena, and the Santa Anita subarea, which underlies Arcadia and Sierra Madre.
    [Show full text]
  • 4.8 Hydrology and Water Quality
    January 2018 CHAPTER 4 Environmental Analysis SECTION 4.8 Hydrology and Water Quality 4.8 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY This section of the EIR analyzes the potential environmental effects on hydrology and water quality from implementation of the proposed project. Data for this section were taken from the Glendale Emergency Plan, Glendale General Plan Safety Element Technical Background Report, the EPA, and Upper Los Angeles River Watershed Watermaster. Full reference-list entries for all cited materials are provided in Section 4.8.5 (References). 4.8.1 Environmental Setting Surface Water The proposed SGCP area is within the Los Angeles River watershed, which includes 834 square miles of Los Angeles County. The eastern portion of the watershed spans from the Santa Monica Mountains to the Simi Hills and in the west from the Santa Susana Mountains to the San Gabriel Mountains. The watershed encompasses and is shaped by the Los Angeles River. The river flows adjacent to the western and southern borders of the proposed SGCP area in a concrete lined channel. The upper portion of the watershed (Upper Los Angeles River Watershed), where the proposed SGCP area is located, contains a network of flood control dams and debris basins that flow to the Los Angeles River (LACDPW 2016). The Upper Los Angeles River watershed is home to approximately 2.3 million people, mostly in high density development in the interior valleys and foothills. Precipitation within the Upper Los Angeles River watershed typically falls in a few major storm events between November and March to an average of 19 inches per year.
    [Show full text]
  • The ANZA-BORREGO DESERT REGION MAP and Many Other California Trail Maps Are Available from Sunbelt Publications. Please See
    SUNBELT WHOLESALE BOOKS AND MAPS CALIFORNIA TRAIL MAPS www.sunbeltpublications.com ANZA-BORREGO DESERT REGION ANZA-BORREGO DESERT REGION MAP 6TH EDITION 3RD EDITION ISBN: 9780899977799 Retail: $21.95 ISBN: 9780899974019 Retail: $9.95 Publisher: WILDERNESS PRESS Publisher: WILDERNESS PRESS AREA: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA AREA: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA The Anza-Borrego and Western Colorado Desert A convenient map to the entire Anza-Borrego Desert Region is a vast, intriguing landscape that harbors a State Park and adjacent areas, including maps for rich variety of desert plants and animals. Prepare for Ocotillo Wells SRVA, Bow Willow Area, and Coyote adventure with this comprehensive guidebooks, Moutnains, it shows roads and hiking trails, diverse providing everything from trail logs and natural history points of interest, and general topography. Trip to a Desert Directory of agencies, accommodations, numbers are keyed to the Anza-Borrego Desert Region and facilities. It is the perfect companion for hikers, guide book by the same authors. campers, off-roaders, mountain bikers, equestrians, history buffs, and casual visitors. The ANZA-BORREGO DESERT REGION MAP and many other California trail maps are available from Sunbelt Publications. Please see the following listing for titles and details. s: catalogs\2018 catalogs\18-CA TRAIL MAPS.doc (800) 626-6579 Fax (619) 258-4916 Page 1 of 7 SUNBELT WHOLESALE BOOKS AND MAPS CALIFORNIA TRAIL MAPS www.sunbeltpublications.com ANGEL ISLAND & ALCATRAZ ISLAND BISHOP PASS TRAIL MAP TRAIL MAP ISBN: 9780991578429 Retail: $10.95 ISBN: 9781877689819 Retail: $4.95 AREA: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA AREA: NORTHERN CALIFORNIA An extremely useful map for all outdoor enthusiasts who These two islands, located in San Francisco Bay are want to experience the Bishop Pass in one handy map.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Pasadena 175 North Garfield Avenue Pasadena, Ca 91101-1704
    CITY OF PASADENA 175 NORTH GARFIELD AVENUE PASADENA, CA 91101-1704 INITIAL STUDY In accordance with the Environmental Policy Guidelines of the City of Pasadena, this analysis, and supporting data constitute the Initial Study for the subject project. This Initial Study provides the assessment for a determination whether the project may have a significant effect on the environment. SECTION I - PROJECT INFORMATION 1. Project Title: Pasadena General Plan Update 2. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Pasadena, Planning & Community Development Department 175 N. Garfield Avenue Pasadena, CA 91101 3. Contact Person and Phone Number: Scott Reimers, Planner Planning & Community Development Department City of Pasadena (626) 744-6710 4. Project Location: The project site is the entire City of Pasadena, which is in the west San Gabriel Valley in central Los Angeles County, six miles northeast of the Los Angeles Civic Center (see Figure 1, Regional Location, and Figure 2, Aerial Photograph). 5. Project Sponsor’s Name and Address: City of Pasadena Scott Reimers, Planner Planning & Community Development Department 175 N. Garfield Avenue Pasadena, CA 91109 6. General Plan Designation: Various; see Section 8, below. 7. Zoning: Various; see Section 8, below. 8. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The proposed General Plan Update would apply to the entire City, spanning 14,802 acres from the southern slopes of the San Gabriel Mountains in the north to the west-central San Gabriel Valley in the south. The junction of the Interstate 210 (I-210), State Route 134 (SR-134), and I-710 freeways is near the western end of the City’s Central District; the I-210 then extends east across the central part of the City and north through the northwest part of the City.
    [Show full text]
  • SMMC Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-2020
    SANTA MONICA MOUNTAINS CONSERVANCY ANNUAL REPORT FISCAL YEAR 2019-2020 PROJECT ACTIVITY AND COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CERTIFICATION State of California, Gavin Newsom, Governor The Natural Resources Agency, Wade Crowfoot, Secretary Dedicated to JEROME C. DANIEL Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy and Advisory Committee Member 1983-2020 CONTENTS Mission Statement ....................................................................................................... 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................. 2 Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy Members .................................................... 3 Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy Advisory Committee ................................. 4 Strategic Objectives ..................................................................................................... 7 Encumbering State Funds Certification-Interest Costs .......................................... 9 Workprogram Priorities ............................................................................................ 10 River/Urban ......................................................................... See attached map Simi Hills ............................................................................... See attached map Western Rim of the Valley .................................................. See attached map Eastern Rim of the Valley ................................................... See attached map Western Santa Monica Mountains .....................................
    [Show full text]
  • Programmatic EA for Outdoor Tests
    FINAL PROGRAMMATIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR JET PROPULSION LABORATORY PERIODIC SCIENTIFIC DEVELOPMENT AND TESTING ACTIVITIES ON-SITE AND IN THE ARROYO SECO NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION PREPARED BY Amec Foster Wheeler Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. 104 W. Anapamu Street, Suite 204A Santa Barbara, California 93101 MARCH 2018 FINAL FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT FOR JET PROPULSION LABORATORY PERIODIC SCIENTIFIC DEVELOPMENT AND TESTING ACTIVITIES ON-SITE AND IN THE ARROYO SECO 1.0 INTRODUCTION Pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969, as amended (42 U.S. Code [USC] 4321, et seq.), the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) Regulations for Implementing the Procedural Provisions of NEPA (40 Code of Federal Regulations [CFR] Parts 1500-1508), and National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) policy and procedures (14 CFR Part 1216, Subpart 1216.3), NASA has made a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) with respect to the proposed JPL Periodic Scientific Development and Testing Activities On-Site and in the Arroyo Seco. NASA has reviewed the Programmatic Environmental Assessment (PEA) prepared for the proposed periodic scientific development and testing activities and determined that it presents an accurate and adequate analysis of the scope and level of associated environmental impacts. NASA hereby incorporates the PEA by reference in this FONSI. The PEA programmatically assesses environmental impacts associated with a suite of outdoor scientific development and testing activities at NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) on-site and within other appropriate landscapes in close proximity to NASA JPL, including the adjacent Arroyo Seco. These outdoor testing actions are small-scale, non-intrusive, short-duration outdoor testing, verification, and calibration activities, and are necessary to support and fulfill NASA scientific and technology demonstration missions as well as tasks conducted by NASA JPL under technology development agreement with other Federal agencies.
    [Show full text]
  • GOCHA Landfill Position Paper
    GLENOAKS CANYON HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION’S (GOCHA) POSITION ON THE FURTHER DEVELOPMENT OF THE SCHOLL CANYON LANDFILL 2015 INTRODUCTION GOCHA represents the families of approximately 775 single-family homes within Glenoaks Canyon (“Canyon”), which is located at the eastern part of Glendale in the San Rafael Hills. The Scholl Canyon Landfill (“Landfill”) forms the easternmost boundary of the Canyon and is situated at the summit of a section of the San Rafael Hills directly above the Canyon. The Landfill extends from the summit of the San Rafael Hills to the bottom of Glenoaks Canyon where it terminates at the Lower Scholl Canyon Park. The Landfill’s address is 3001 Scholl Canyon Road, Glendale, California, 91206. It can be reached from the Ventura Freeway (State Route 134) by taking the Figueroa Street exit in Eagle Rock area of the City of Los Angeles. The Landfill consists of 535 acres, of which 440 acres of which are designated for landfill operations and 95 acres are designated for other related operations. Of the area designated for landfill operations, 314 acres are currently active and 126 acres are inactive. The Landfill was first opened in 1961 and currently serves a waste shed consisting of the cities of Glendale, Pasadena, La Canada-Flintridge, San Marino, Sierra Madre, and South Pasadena, and the unincorporated communities of Altadena, La Crescenta, Montrose, and East Pasadena. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY GOCHA is opposed to the City of Glendale (The City) prolonging the current more than 50-year-life of the Scholl Canyon Landfill (1961 to 2015) either through the construction of an anaerobic digestion facility or expansion of the landfill site for waste disposal, as proposed in the Environmental Impact Report that will soon come before the City Council for review.
    [Show full text]
  • Pre-Consolidation Communities of Los Angeles, 1862-1932
    LOS ANGELES CITYWIDE HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT Context: Pre-Consolidation Communities of Los Angeles, 1862-1932 Prepared for: City of Los Angeles Department of City Planning Office of Historic Resources July 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE 1 CONTRIBUTOR 1 INTRODUCTION 1 THEME: WILMINGTON, 1862-1909 4 THEME: SAN PEDRO, 1882-1909 30 THEME: HOLLYWOOD, 1887-1910 56 THEME: SAWTELLE, 1896-1918 82 THEME: EAGLE ROCK, 1886-1923 108 THEME: HYDE PARK, 1887-1923 135 THEME: VENICE, 1901-1925 150 THEME: WATTS, 1902-1926 179 THEME: BARNES CITY, 1919-1926 202 THEME: TUJUNGA, 1888-1932 206 SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPY 232 SurveyLA Citywide Historic Context Statement Pre-consolidation Communities of Los Angeles, 1862-1932 PREFACE This historic context is a component of Los Angeles’ citywide historic context statement and provides guidance to field surveyors in identifying and evaluating potential historic resources relating to Pre- Consolidation Communities of Los Angeles. Refer to www.HistoricPlacesLA.org for information on designated resources associated with this context as well as those identified through SurveyLA and other surveys. CONTRIBUTOR Daniel Prosser is a historian and preservation architect. He holds an M.Arch. from Ohio State University and a Ph.D. in history from Northwestern University. Before retiring, Prosser was the Historic Sites Architect for the Kansas State Historical Society. INTRODUCTION The “Pre-Consolidation Communities of Los Angeles” context examines those communities that were at one time independent, self-governing cities. These include (presented here as themes): Wilmington, San Pedro, Hollywood, Sawtelle, Eagle Rock, Hyde Park, Venice, Watts, Barnes City, and Tujunga. This context traces the history of each of these cities (up to the point of consolidation with the City of Los Angeles), identifying important individuals and patterns of settlement and development, and then links the events and individuals to extant historic resources (individual resources and historic districts).
    [Show full text]
  • Funds Needed for Memorial
    Press Coverage July 2021 Where City Meets Local baseball teams play at this What You Should Do When You Desert: Visiting stadium. It’s also one of the Visit Mesa, Arizona locations for spring training for If you’re interested in visiting Mesa, Mesa Arizona major league teams. Arizona there are lots of great Ali Raza July 28, 2021 0 Comment Another interesting fact about activities you can do while here. Divingdaily.com Hohokam Stadium is that it’s named Check out the arts center or many of after the indigenous tribe that lived the museums Mesa has to offer. on the land where the stadium was built. Check out some of the other travel blogs on our site if you liked this Check Out the Arts Center one. When planning a visit to Mesa, you should also check out the arts center. The center is home to 14 different Get Outside! art studios, five art galleries, and four By Arizona Game and Fish Did you know that Mesa is the third- theaters. If you’re an art lover, you Department largest city in Arizona? On average, can’t leave Mesa without spending a Jul 23, 2021 there are about 313 sunny days in day here. White Mountain Independent Mesa each year. Wmicentral.com There are also beautiful murals and With great weather and so much to sculptures throughout the city you Getting outdoors is an important explore you’re probably interested in can see during monthly art part of our American heritage and visiting Mesa, Arizona. This guide walks.
    [Show full text]
  • California Assembly District 53 FOUNDATION State Parks Within 60 Minutes Driving Distance from District Office
    CALIFORNIA STATE PARKS California Assembly District 53 FOUNDATION State Parks within 60 minutes driving distance from District Office Ä District Office: 320 West 4th Street, Room 1050, Los Angeles, CA 90013 )" Bolsa Chica SB )" California Citrus SHP )" Castaic Lake SRA )" Chino Hills SP Driving Distance: 33.0 miles Driving Distance: 56.5 miles Driving Distance: 43.1 miles Driving Distance: 37.5 miles Driving Time: 37 minutes Driving Time: 53 minutes Driving Time: 41 minutes Driving Time: 36 minutes Transit Time: 3 hours, 23 minutes Transit Time: 3 hours, 10 minutes Transit Time: not available Transit Time: 2 hours, 58 minutes )" Corona del Mar SB )" Crystal Cove SP )" Dockweiler SB )" Huntington SB Driving Distance: 46.1 miles Driving Distance: 48.9 miles Driving Distance: 18.9 miles Driving Distance: 38.9 miles Driving Time: 47 minutes Driving Time: 49 minutes Driving Time: 20 minutes Driving Time: 42 minutes Transit Time: 1 hour, 58 minutes Transit Time: 2 hours, 1 minutes Transit Time: 2 hours, 46 minutes Transit Time: 1 hour, 40 minutes )" Kenneth Hahn SRA )" Leo Carrillo SP )" Los Angeles SHP )" Los Encinos SHP Driving Distance: 9.5 miles Driving Distance: 42.5 miles Driving Distance: 2.0 miles Driving Distance: 19.2 miles Driving Time: 15 minutes Driving Time: 50 minutes Driving Time: 5 minutes Driving Time: 21 minutes Transit Time: 1 hour, 1 minutes Transit Time: 2 Hours, 27 minutes Transit Time: 20 minutes Transit Time: 1 hour, 25 minutes )" Malibu Creek SP )" Placerita Canyon SP )" Point Dume SB )" Pío Pico SHP Driving Distance: 34.5 miles Driving Distance: 31.6 miles Driving Distance: 35.4 miles Driving Distance: 18.5 miles Driving Time: 34 minutes Driving Time: 31 minutes Driving Time: 45 minutes Driving Time: 19 minutes Transit Time: 2 hour, 18 minutes Transit Time: 1 hour, 34 minutes Transit Time: 2 hours, 39 minutes Transit Time: 1 hour, 51 minutes )" Rio de Los Angeles State Park SRA )" Robert H.
    [Show full text]
  • CALIFORNIA FISH and GAME “Journal for Conservation and Management of California’S Species and Ecosystems”
    CALIFORNIA FISH AND GAME “Journal for Conservation and Management of California’s Species and Ecosystems” Volume 105 Fall 2019 Number 4 Lorraine Elrod © California Academy of Sciences Published Quarterly by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife STATE OF CALIFORNIA Gavin Newsom, Governor CALIFORNIA NATURAL RESOURCES AGENCY Wade Crowfoot, Secretary for Natural Resources FISH AND GAME COMMISSION Eric Sklar, President Jacque Hostler-Carmesin, Vice President Russell Burns, Member Peter S. Silva, Member Samantha Murray, Member Melissa Miller-Henson, Acting Executive Director DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE Charlton “Chuck” Bonham, Director CALIFORNIA FISH AND GAME EDITORIAL STAFF Ange Darnell Baker ...........................................................................Editor-in-Chief Lorna Bernard ...........................Office of Communication, Education and Outreach Neil Clipperton, Scott Osborn, Laura Patterson, Joel Trumbo, Dan Skalos, and Karen Converse .................................................... Wildlife Branch Felipe La Luz ...................................................................................... Water Branch Jeff Rodzen, Jeff Weaver, and Ken Kundargi ................................. Fisheries Branch Cherilyn Burton ........................................... Habitat Conservation Planning Branch Kevin Fleming ...............................................Watershed Restoration Grants Branch Jeff Villepique, Steve Parmenter ............................................ Inland Deserts Region Paul Reilly,
    [Show full text]