The Making of Asia's First Bilateral FTA: Origins and Regional

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Making of Asia's First Bilateral FTA: Origins and Regional AUSTRALIA–JAPAN RESEARCH CENTRE ANU COLLEGE OF ASIA & THE PACIFIC ASIA PACIFIC SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS AND GOVERNMENT THE MAKING OF ASIA’S FIRST BILATERAL FTA: ORIGINS AND REGIONAL IMPLICATIONS OF THE JAPAN–SINGAPORE ECONOMIC PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT Takashi Terada PACIFIC ECONOMIC PAPERS NO. 354, 2006 PACIFIC ECONOMIC PAPER NO. 354 2006 The Making of Asia’s First Bilateral FTA: Origins and Regional Implications of the Japan–Singapore Economic Partnership Agreement Takashi Terada National University of Singapore [email protected] AUSTRALIA–JAPAN RESEARCH CENTRE ASIA PACIFIC SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS & GOVERNMENT © Australia–Japan Research Centre 2005 This work is copyright. Apart from those uses which may be permitted under the Copyright Act 1968 as amended, no part may be reproduced by any process without written permission. Pacific Economic Papers are published under the direction of the Research Committee of the Australia–Japan Research Centre. Members of the Research Committee are: Professor Jenny Corbett Executive Director Australia–Japan Research Centre The Australian National University, Canberra Professor Christopher Findlay Professor of Economics University of Adelaide Adelaide, South Australia Professor Emeritus Peter Drysdale Asia Pacific School of Economics and Government The Australian National University, Canberra Professor Stuart Harris Department of International Relations The Australian National University, Canberra Papers submitted for publication in this series are subject to double-blind external review by two referees. The Australia–Japan Research Centre is part of the Asia Pacific School of Economics and Government, The Australian National University, Canberra. ISSN 0 728 8409 ISBN 0 86413 3073 Australia–Japan Research Centre Asia Pacific School of Economics and Government The Australian National University Canberra ACT 0200 Telephone: (61 2) 6125 3780 Facsimile: (61 2) 6125 0767 E-mail: [email protected] URL: http://apseg.anu.edu.au ii CONTENTS List of tables and appendix ......................................................................................iv Introduction ..................................................................................................... 1 Features of FTAs .............................................................................................. 3 Major impetuses behind Singapore’s FTA strategy ............................................4 Why Japan? ...................................................................................................... 7 Japan and multi-layered trade policy ................................................................. 8 Origins of the JSEPA ...................................................................................... 10 Preparations ................................................................................................... 11 Why Singapore? .............................................................................................. 13 Features of trade policy-making in Singapore and Japan ................................. 14 Economic effects of the JSEPA ...................................................................... 17 Regional implications ..................................................................................... 19 Impacts on Japan’s trade policy ...................................................................... 22 Conclusion ..................................................................................................... 24 Notes ....................................................................................................................... 26 References ............................................................................................................... 26 iii TABLES Table 1 Agricultural products on which Japan imposes high tariffs ............ 16 APPENDIX Appendix 1 Areas covered by agreement between Japan and the Republic of Singapore for a new-age economic partnership (JSEPA) ........... 28 iv THE MAKING OF ASIA’S FIRST BILATERAL FTA: ORIGINS AND REGIONAL IMPLICATIONS OF THE JAPAN–SINGAPORE ECONOMIC PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT * Japanese Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi ushered in a new era in Japan’s international trade policy in January 2002 when he and his Singaporean counterpart, Goh Chok Tong, signed the Japan-Singapore Economic Partnership Agreement (JSEPA), the first bilateral Free Trade Agreement (FTA) signed between Asian countries. This trade strategy also reflected Japan’s interest in launching its so-called ‘multi-layered trade policy’ which meant the pursuit of bilateral and regional trading arrangements, including FTAs, in an attempt to complement multilateralism based on the GATT/WTO to reinvigorate efforts to achieve global trade liberalisation. This paper aims to examine how and why Japan and Singapore decided to pursue FTAs, what interests both perceived in their pursuit of FTAs, what elements contributed to both countries being linked in this trade policy arrangement, and what implications the JSEPA has had for the FTA movement in East Asia. It argues that the JSEPA was made possible mainly through Singapore’s initial offer to exclude agricultural products from tariff elimination. But Japan faced problems in seeking FTAs with other ASEAN countries which were less developed than Singapore and had a higher proportion of agricultural exports, as the exclusion of specific agricultural products, such as rice and sugar, would contradict Japan’s claim that its FTAs would bolster the WTO-based multilateral system. The proliferation of FTAs in East Asia may generate a ‘spaghetti-bowl’ effect with varying rules of origin that may divert and distort trade, but the ‘new age’ aspects of the Japan- Singapore agreement will also have some positive economic effects. Although the preferential trade elements of the agreement are detrimental, the smaller portion of tariff elimination results in a smaller trade diversion effect on trading partners. Therefore, the Japan-Singapore agreement carries symbolic meaning in terms of trade policy debates as well as signifying a paradigm shift in Japan’s international trade policy. Introduction Japanese Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi’s visit to Singapore in January 2002 ushered in a new era in Japan’s international trade policy. Koizumi and his Singaporean counterpart, Goh Chok Tong, signed the Japan–Singapore Economic Partnership Agreement (JSEPA). This was the first bilateral Free Trade Agreement (FTA) signed by Asian countries that provided not only for the elimination of tariffs, but also for other measures including the liberalisation of investment rules, the harmonisation of Pacific Economic Papers competition policies, and the mutual recognition of standards. This was also Japan’s first FTA. The conclusion of the JSEPA meant that the fundamental significance of the free trade spirit and of the potential benefits to be obtained from bilateral economic cooperation for further growth had been mutually acknowledged by both nations. In fact, when the negotiations for trade liberalisation in global and regional levels bogged down, Singapore swiftly engaged in planning for and forging a vast array of FTAs, culminating in the creation of an FTA groundswell in the East Asian region. This was made possible mainly because of Singapore’s trade structure, which comprises few sectors that need protection at home, allowing 99.9 per cent of its imports to be tariff-free. It is this trade bilateralism that subsequently contributed to Singapore being recognised as a major mover in the international trade arena, despite its small size. This is evidenced by the fact that it has concluded FTAs with New Zealand (2000), Japan (2002), the European Free Trade Association (comprising Switzerland, Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway) (2002), Australia (2003), the United States (2003), Jordan (2004), India (2005) and South Korea (2005). Singapore is presently engaged in FTA negotiations with countries including Bahrain, Mexico, Canada, Panama, Peru and Sri Lanka. After the JSEPA, Japan signed FTAs with Mexico and the Philippines in 2004, and is expected to conclude treaties with Malaysia, Thailand, and South Korea subsequently. Yet Japan is perceived as not developing its interest in FTA very easily or promptly. This is partly because Japan long had a ‘cast- iron commitment to the multilateral trading system’ (Reuters 25 October 2000). Japan was labelled ‘the staunchest multilateralist’ (New York Times 9 November 2001), due to its exclusive focus on global trade bodies — such as the General Agreement on Tariff and Trade (GATT) and its successor, the World Trade Organisation (WTO) — for the purposes of facilitating global trade liberalisation. In effect, Japan had long criticised FTAs as discriminatory against non-members and detrimental to the maintenance of the GATT/WTO-based international trading system. Thus, for many years FTAs were widely perceived among the trade policy intellectuals in Japan to be the last trade policy option that Japan would make. Japan’s decision to deviate from its traditional stance on international trade policy by negotiating a FTA was thus a surprise. Singapore lent Japan a hand for such a major trade policy change by proposing an agriculture-free FTA, which Japan could negotiate more easily for than other FTA partners like Mexico and Thailand. These countries showed a strong interest in the liberalisation of such agricultural products as pork and rice, respectively. It was claimed that the JSEPA added a considerable enrichment
Recommended publications
  • Japan's Secretive Death Penalty Policy
    Japan’s Secretive Death Penalty Policy: Contours, Origins, Justifications, and Meanings♦ David T. Johnson I. ABSTRACT...................................................................................................62 II. “REIKO IN WONDERLAND” .....................................................................63 A. SECRECY AND SILENCE ..............................................................................70 III. ORIGINS .......................................................................................................76 A. MEIJI BIRTH ...............................................................................................76 B. THE OCCUPATION’S “CENSORED DEMOCRACY” ........................................80 C. POSTWAR ACCELERATION..........................................................................87 IV. JUSTIFICATIONS ........................................................................................97 V. MEANINGS.................................................................................................109 A. SECRECY AND LEGITIMACY......................................................................109 B. SECRECY AND SALIENCE ..........................................................................111 C. SECRECY AND DEMOCRACY.....................................................................117 D. SECRECY AND LAW ..................................................................................119 VI. CONCLUSION.............................................................................................123
    [Show full text]
  • Statistical Handbook of Japan 2009 Is Also Available at the Following Address
    STATISTICAL HANDBOOK OF JAPAN 2009 Statistics Bureau Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications JAPAN © 2009 by Statistics Bureau Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications Japan All rights reserved. Edited by Statistical Research and Training Institute Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications Japan Published by Statistics Bureau Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications 19-1 Wakamatsu-cho, Shinjuku-ku Tokyo 162-8668 Japan Printed in Japan ISSN 0081-4792 On the Internet Statistical Handbook of Japan 2009 is also available at the following address: http://www.stat.go.jp/english/data/handbook/index.htm Preface This handbook is designed to provide a clear and coherent overview of present-day Japan through statistics. It provides statistical tables, figures, maps and photographs to portray conditions in modern-day Japan from a variety of perspectives, including demographics, economic and social trends, and culture. Most of the comments and statistical data for this purpose have been drawn from principal statistical publications available from government and other leading sources. For more in-depth statistical information on Japan, readers are invited to peruse the Japan Statistical Yearbook and the Japan Monthly Statistics. We hope that this booklet will serve as a guide in your search for knowledge about Japan. We are always happy to receive opinions or requests from readers. You can also view the contents of this booklet on the website of the Statistics Bureau. August 2009 Shigeru KAWASAKI Director-General Statistics Bureau Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications Japan Notes for Users 1. The present issue contains statistics that became available by June 30, 2009.
    [Show full text]
  • Gangnam Style” Go Viral in Japan?: Gender Divide and Subcultural Heterogeneity in Contemporary Japan
    Why Didn’t “Gangnam Style” Go Viral in Japan?: Gender Divide and Subcultural Heterogeneity in Contemporary Japan John Lie, University of California, Berkeley Abstract Psy’s “Gangnam Style” was the global pop music and video sensation of 2012, but it failed to go viral in Japan. The involuted nature of the Japanese popular music industry—especially the imperative of indigenization—stunted the song’s dissemination. Simultaneously, the song failed to resonate with its potential base of Japanese K-pop fans, who valorized beauty and romance. In making sense of the Japanese reception of “Gangnam Style,” the author also analyzes the sources of both the Korean Wave and the anti–Korean Wave in Japan. Keywords: Japan, South Korea, popular culture, Korean Wave, K-pop, J-pop, anti–Korean Wave, gender, subculture, popular music, soap opera, Internet, virality, cultural globalization Psy’s “Gangnam Style” was the greatest global pop sensation of 2012.1 It not only registered over a billion hits on YouTube by the end of the year but also became the best-selling single in over thirty countries, including Austria and Australia, Belgium and Bulgaria.2 The singer’s pony- gallop dance could be seen nearly everywhere, as imitations and parodies proliferated. As a wag put it: “Gangnam Style parodies are the new Gangnam Style.”3 However, one OECD country that remained relatively immune to the viral video’s snare was Japan.4 As Erica Ho speculated in 2012 in Time magazine, The recent political climate in northeast Asia might have cooled the Japanese fever for Korean pop songs. In late August … a dispute erupted over the Takeshima and Dokdo islets between Japan and Korea, with both countries claiming ownership.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Are Japanese Women Having Fewer Children?
    Gender, Family and Fertility: Why are Japanese Women Having Fewer Children? Kazue Kojima PhD University of York The Center for Women’s Studies 2013 September Abstract Japanese women are having fewer children than ever before. There have been many quantitative studies undertaken to attempt to reveal the reasons behind this. The Japanese government has been concerned about the future economic decline of the country, and has been encouraging women to have more children. Although the Japanese government has been supporting women financially, it has not focused on gender equality, making it more difficult for women to be able to pursue their chosen careers. Japanese women have greater access to higher education than ever before, yet the Japanese patriarchal social structure still compels women to rely on men and all but eliminates their independence. The Japanese male-dominated society is resistant want to change. Family ties are still very strong, and women are expected to take care of the household and do unpaid work, while men work outside the home and earn a paid salary. In the labour force, women do not enjoy the same level of equality and opportunity as their male counterparts, as it is naturally marry, have children, and take care of the family. The system is skewed in favor of the males. Women are not able to pursue the same career path as men; even from the start, women are often considered as candidates for potential wives for the male workers. In the course of this research, I conducted a total of 22 interviews of single and married Japanese women.
    [Show full text]
  • Japan's Anti-Conspiracy
    Japan’s Anti-Conspiracy Law: Relinquishing Japan’s Civil Liberties in the Name of Global Counterterrorism Efforts Brandon Marc Higa* I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................... 202 II. PRIME MINISTER SHINZO ABE’S VOW TO PROTECT JAPAN FROM TERRORISM .................................................................................... 208 A. Promise to Guarantee Safety for the 2020 Tōkyō Olympic and Paralympic Games ................................................................. 209 B. Promise to Fulfill U.N. Convention Against Transnational Organized Crime Signatory State Obligations ......................... 212 III. ABE’S POLITICAL MANEUVERING IN THE ANTI-CONSPIRACY LEGISLATION’S PASSAGE RAISES CONCERNS AMONG LEGAL EXPERTS AND HUMAN RIGHTS ADVOCATES ..................................... 214 A. Rare Legislative Bypass Tactic Used to Enact Anti-Conspiracy Legislation .............................................................................. 215 B. Local opposition of the anti-conspiracy law ............................ 217 C. Criticism from Legal Experts and U.N. Human Rights Special Rapporteur ............................................................................. 220 IV. STATUS OF JAPAN’S CRIMINAL PROCEDURE AFTER THE ANTI- CONSPIRACY LAW WAS ENACTED ................................................... 221 A. Japan’s Code of Criminal Procedure and Concerns over Civil Liberties ................................................................................. 222 B. Expanding
    [Show full text]
  • Japanese Prefectural Scapegoats in the Constitutional Landscape: Protecting Children from Violent Video Games in the Name of "Public Welfare"
    Japanese Prefectural Scapegoats in the Constitutional Landscape: Protecting Children from Violent Video Games in the Name of "Public Welfare" SUSAN MINAMIZONO* I. INTRO DUCTION .................................................................................................. 136 II. FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION IN THE CONTEXT OF PUBLIC W ELFARE .......................................................................................... 139 A . B ackground............................................................................................. 139 B. Public Welfare and the Justificationfor Censorship............................... 142 C. Carving Out a Special Exception for Children ....................................... 146 III. THE LOCAL O RDINANCES ................................................................................... 148 IV. COMPARING LOCAL LEGISLATIVE ACTION IN THE UNITED STATES .................... 152 A. Public Welfare versus Compelling State Interest..................................... 152 B. The FailedAttempts by State Legislatures............................................... 154 V. THE VIDEO GAME INDUSTRY'S RESPONSE TO THE REGULATION OF CHILDREN'S ACCESS TO "HARM FUL INFORMATION". .......................................................................... 156 VI. IS THE BAN OF VIOLENT VIDEO GAMES AN EFFECTIVE CURE FOR THE YOUTH VIOLENCE EPIDEMIC? .................................... 160 V II. C ON CLU SION .....................................................................................................163 * J.D.
    [Show full text]
  • LAURA NENZI Lindsay Young Professor Japanese History Department of History University of Tennessee Knoxville 915 Volunteer Blvd
    Nenzi / 1 LAURA NENZI Lindsay Young Professor Japanese History Department of History University of Tennessee Knoxville 915 Volunteer Blvd. 6th Floor Dunford Hall Knoxville, TN 37996-4065 email: [email protected] EDUCATION 2004 Ph.D. in Japanese History, University of California Santa Barbara 1994 Laurea summa cum laude in East Asian Studies, University of Venice Ca’ Foscari, Italy FIELDS Early Modern Japan (1600-1868): social history; gender; travel literature; Meiji Restoration. ACADEMIC APPOINTMENTS 2016-present Professor University of Tennessee Knoxville 2016-2017 Specially Appointed Professor Ochanomizu University, Tokyo 2011-2016 Associate Professor University of Tennessee Knoxville 2009-2011 Assistant Professor University of Tennessee Knoxville 2004-2009 Assistant Professor Florida International University, Miami PUBLICATIONS Books Nenzi, L. The Chaos and Cosmos of Kurosawa Tokiko: One Woman’s Transit from Tokugawa to Meiji Japan. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press, 2015. Nenzi, L. Excursions in Identity: Travel and the Intersection of Place, Gender, and Status in Edo Japan. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press, 2008. Book Chapters Nenzi L. “The Gourd and the Gas Lamp: A Journey into the Night of Nineteenth-Century Edo (Tokyo).” In The Global City: The Urban Condition as a Pervasive Phenomenon, edited by Marco Pretelli, Ines Tolic, and Rosa Tamborrino. Edizioni AISU International. Forthcoming fall 2020. Nenzi, L. “Travel and Gift Exchange in Nineteenth-Century Japan.“ In Mediated by Gifts: Politics and Society in Japan, 1350-1850, edited by Martha Chaiklin, 199-218. Leiden: Brill, 2016. Nenzi, L. “Pilgrims.” In The Routledge Companion to Travel Writing, edited by Carl Thompson, 217-226. Abingdon and New York: Routledge, 2016.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainability Report
    Sustainability Report 2005 Sustainability means to conduct business in a way that balances the three aspects of economic activity, environmental consideration and social responsibility in order to increase value for stakeholders. This concept is consistent with our objective of “creating value for all our stakeholders” established in our new business plan, NISSAN Value-Up, which began in April 2005. Activities toward sustainability create the basis for the sustained development of the company, and we will aim to achieve continuous progress and performance improvements. In fiscal year 2004, we made progress in all areas of activity covered by the Sustainability Report issued for the first time last year. This report describes some of our major activities and achievements. In order to set a clear direction for the future, to further strengthen our activities and to promote both internal and external communication on sustainability, we assigned a corporate officer to the task in April 2005 and established a Sustainability Office inside the Communication Division. Through this report and the newly established Sustainability Office, it is our hope to engage in a continuous, constructive dialogue with our stakeholders. Creating Value Customer Employee Partner Shareholder Society and Environment CONTENTS Related Corporate Reports CEO Statement 01 Corporate History / Corporate Profile 03 This Sustainability Report describes Nissan’s Global Operational Presence 05 activities in the three aspects of sustainability: Our New Three-year Plan: NISSAN Value-Up 07 economic, environmental and social issues, emphasizing our philosophy and basic approach. For Corporate Governance 09 more detailed economic, environmental and social The philosophy and systems behind Nissan data, please see the following reports.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fifth Periodic Report by the Government of Japan
    THE FIFTH PERIODIC REPORT BY THE GOVERNMENT OF JAPAN UNDER ARTICLE 40 PARAGRAPH 1(b) OF THE INTERNATIONAL COVENANT ON CIVIL AND POLITICAL RIGHTS December,2006 CONTENTS I.Part 1 General Comments ・Institutional Aspects of Human Rights Protection in Japan ・The Concept of “Public Welfare”in the Constitution of Japan ・ The Relationship between the Covenant and Domestic Laws including the Constitution of Japan ・Human rights education, encouragement, publicity II. Part 2 Article - by - Article Report Article 1 :Right of Self-Determination Article 2 :Obligation to Implement the Covenant ・Concerns Pertaining to Foreign Nationals ・Measures for Persons with Disabilities ・The First Optional Protocol Article 3 :Gender Equality Principle ・Mechanisms for the Promotion of the Realization of a Gender-Equal Society ・Basic Law for a Gender-equal Society ・Basic Plan for Gender Equality ・Women's Participation in Decision-making Processes ・Employment Measures ・Protection from Violence Article 4:Measures Derogating from Obligations under the Covenant taken in a Time of Public Emergency Article 5 :Exemptions Article 6 :Rights Concerning Life ・The Issue of the Death Penalty Article 7 :Prohibition of Torture and Other Cruel Treatment Article 8 :Prohibition of Bondage and Forced Labor Article 9 :Liberty of Person ・Legal Framework ・Detention of Suspects ・Detention in the Immigration Facilities ・Habeas Corpus Law Article 10 :Treatment of Detainees ・Legal Framework ・The Right to Consultations with Defense Counsel in Criminal Custodial Facilities ・Treatment in Correctional
    [Show full text]