DOCSLIB.ORG

Carbon River Corridor Charette in Partnership with the Mt

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Carbon River Corridor Charette in Partnership with the Mt National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Mount Rainier National Park • Washington Carbon River Corridor Charette In partnership with the Mt. Baker Snoqualmie National Forest February and March 2003 MOUNT RAINIER NATIONAL PARK CARBON RIVER CORRIDOR CHARETTE MOUNT RAINIER NATIONAL PARK CARBON RIVER CORRIDOR CHARETTE MOUNT RAINIER NATIONAL PARK CARBON RIVER CORRIDOR CHARETTE ABOUT THIS DOCUMENT This document is the fourth in a series of stud- · Section 106 of the National Historic Preser- ies of the highway corridors leading to Mount vation Act (NHPA) Rainier National Park. The study focused on · The National Environmental Policy Act the Carbon River corridor on the north side of (NEPA) the park, looking at portions of the SR 165, SR · Washington State Environmental Policy 162, and SR 410 corridors. The study included Act (SEPA) public outreach, with participation from the communities of Wilkeson, Orting, South Prai- All of the ideas included here would also gen- rie, and Buckley, as well as the Puyallup Tribe erally require additional public input, permit- and several participating agencies. ting, and design prior to any implementation. The study explored a variety of opportunities Therefore, until affected historic, cultural, and to improve the visitor experience in the cor- natural resources are identified and avoidance ridor, and to strengthen the relationship be- or mitigation strategies are negotiated with tween local communities and the park. regional Native American tribes and other interested parties, the recommendations and The National Park Service partnered with the visions that follow remain subject to design US Forest Service and local jurisdictions to changes, relocation, or termination resulting complete the study through a two-week “cha- from federal, state, and local policies and laws rette” process. Public workshops, stakeholder designed to ensure that tribal and other his- meetings, and interviews were followed by a toric, cultural, and natural resources are given week of intense idea generation and develop- appropriate consideration and protection. ment of concepts and visualizations for poten- tial activities in the corridor. All recommendations in this document are collective ideas generated by the project par- ticipants and are conceptual in nature. Con- sequently, they may contain inaccuracies or omissions. A formal draft document was not distributed prior to the release of this final document. If advanced, recommendations would require planning, and compliance with a variety of environmental review including, but not limited to: The charette process included public meetings throughout the corridor MOUNT RAINIER NATIONAL PARK CARBON RIVER CORRIDOR CHARETTE MOUNT RAINIER NATIONAL PARK CARBON RIVER CORRIDOR CHARETTE i ii MOUNT RAINIER NATIONAL PARK CARBON RIVER CORRIDOR CHARETTE MOUNT RAINIER NATIONAL PARK CARBON RIVER CORRIDOR CHARETTE GENERAL STATEMENTS FROM THE MUCKLESHOOT AND PUYALLUP INDIAN TRIBES ON THE CHARETTE PERSPECTIVE OF THE MUCKLESHOOT TRIBE OF PERSPECTIVE OF THE PUYALLUP TRIBE OF INDIANS ON THE CARBON RIVER INDIANS ON THE CARBON RIVER CORRIDOR CHARETTE CORRIDOR CHARETTE The Muckleshoot Indian Tribe does not sup- The Carbon River is the middle river within a Puyallup tribal connections to every portion of port the proposals conceptualized in this docu- three-pronged river system referred to as the the Carbon River basin persist strongly today, ment. Formal tribal consultation is required Puyallup River watershed. For the Puyallup although comparatively reduced due to prop- for federal agency undertakings under NHPA, Tribe, the Carbon River basin is a region that erty ownership patterns and basic limitations NEPA, and other federal and state laws and has always been treasured as an area of ongo- upon tribal access and/or available uses. It is policies. To date, only limited consultation has ing traditional cultural significance that is cen- significant for the Puyallup tribal community taken place, as planning and design activities tral within the tribes’ traditional homelands. that key traditional practices and the natural for specific corridor components have not yet and cultural resource elements they rely upon occurred. The area under discussion is of pri- Historically, the indigenous people of the Car- do have some reserved protections. Of particu- mary treaty and traditional importance to the bon River basin were primarily displaced to lar concern to the Puyallup are adverse impacts Tribe, which has expressed its grave concerns the Puyallup Indian Reservation after it was to local tribal cultural opportunities related to regarding the potential direct and indirect established in December 1856. The Puyallup native plants, fisheries, and wildlife, and also effects of the developments conceptualized Tribe recognizes the entire Carbon River ba- tribal traditional cultural properties, sacred here. These include potential adverse effects sin as an area of great cultural value which is sites and/or special places; especially impor- to historic, archeological and traditional cul- linked both geographically and hydrologically tant is determining adverse effects in terms of tural resources, as well as to natural resources to the overall lower Puyallup River valley since cultural needs of the tribes’ still forthcoming and related values in the project area. It is im- each of the three separate rivers of the greater future generations. portant that planners and project proponents Puyallup watershed system all join together understand that the Muckleshoot Tribe does here. Local ethnographic and historic informa- The intent of the charette process and the vi- not see themselves as part of the stakeholder tion emphasizes that tribal residences existed sion presented via the charette document are group and has not subscribed to the visions both downwards of the foothill areas, as well not congruent with Puyallup tribal needs in the and values expressed here. Additional stud- as throughout the overall Carbon River basin Carbon River region in that concepts nurturing ies addressing the Tribe’s concerns will be re- area. Wapato John - of the Puyallup village future urban growth and tourism in fashions quired prior to finalization of any component sited near the forks of the Puyallup/Carbon that conflict with tribal natural and cultural re- designs. Rivers - described Puyallup territory as reach- source needs expected in the same geographic ing to both Mount Rainier and the Cascade area are effectively highlighted. Altogether, the Mountains crest. Early written descriptions of Puyallup Tribe recognizes the Carbon River the region oftentimes referred to the Carbon Charette document does not initiate any ac- River as the main branch of the river (com- tions on an official basis, and that any future pared to the Puyallup branch). Since a time actions should still be subject to tribal consul- immemorial, the Carbon River and its tribu- tation requirements; therefore the Puyallup tary systems have served as central features of Tribe expects that it will be properly included the cultural landscape of the Puyallup Indians; in all such related reviews and consultations, all-importantly, the Carbon River was also the whenever pertinent and/or appropriate in the most direct link between the lower Puyallup future. valley and the overall Mount Rainier region. MOUNT RAINIER NATIONAL PARK CARBON RIVER CORRIDOR CHARETTE MOUNT RAINIER NATIONAL PARK CARBON RIVER CORRIDOR CHARETTE iii iv MOUNT RAINIER NATIONAL PARK CARBON RIVER CORRIDOR CHARETTE MOUNT RAINIER NATIONAL PARK CARBON RIVER CORRIDOR CHARETTE TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction . 1 The Roads to Rainier. 2 The Transportation Perspective . 4 Park, Forest, and Gateway Partnerships . 4 The Carbon River Charette Process . 5 The Charette Team . 6 Charette Activities. 6 The Carbon River Corridor Region . 7 The Carbon River Gateway Region . 8 The Foothills Trail . 9 Corridor History. 10 Gateway Communities in the Carbon River Region. 13 Park & Public Lands Issues. 15 Contemporary Native American Perspectives . 17 Public Lands, Gateway Communities & the Challenge of Growth . 18 Charette Outcomes . 19 Charette Outcomes. 20 Corridor-Wide Opportunities . 20 Regional Heritage Framework . 20 Carbon River Corridor Alternative Transportation . 22 Mt. Rainier Boundary Adjustment Area. 29 Fairfax Townsite . 30 Carbon River Conservation Framework. 31 Wilkeson–The Center of Coal Country . 33 Orting–”Blue Highways” Gateway to Mt. Rainier . ..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Mount Rainier National Park
    MOUNT RAINIER NATIONAL PARK • WASHINGTON • UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR NATIONAL PARK SERVICE Mount Rainier [WASHINGTON] National Park United States Department of the Interior Harold L. Ickes, Secretary NATIONAL PARK SERVICE Arno B. Cammerer, Director UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON : 1936 Rules and Regulations [BRIEFED] Events kjERVING a dual purpose, park regulations are designed for the comfort and convenience of visitors as well as for the protection of natural beauties OF HISTORICAL IMPORTANCE and scenery. The following synopsis is for the guidance of visitors, who are requested to assist the park administration by observing the rules. Complete rules and regulations may be seen at the superintendent's office 1792 May 8. The first white man to sec "The Mountain" (Capt. and at ranger stations. George Vancouver, of the Royal English Navy) sighted Fires. the great peak and named it Mount Rainier. Light carefully and in designated places. Extinguish COMPLETELY before leaving 1833 September 2. Dr. William Eraser Tolmie of Nisqually camp, even for temporary absence. Do not guess your fire is out—KNOW it. Do not House, a Hudson's Bay post, entered the northwest corner throw burning tobacco or matches on road or trail sides. of what is now the park. He was the first white man to penetrate this region. Camps. Keep your camp clean. As far as possible burn garbage in camp fire, and empty 1857 July. Lieut. A. V. Kautz, of the United States Army garri­ son at Fort Steilacoom, and four companions made the cans and residue into garbage cans provided. If no can is provided, bury the refuse.
    [Show full text]
  • Outline for Thesis
    THESIS APPROVAL The abstract and thesis of Thomas H. Nylen for the Master of Science in Geology presented October 25, 2001, and accepted by the thesis committee and the department. COMMITTEE APPROVALS: _______________________________________ Andrew G. Fountain, Chair _______________________________________ Scott F. Burns _______________________________________ Christina L. Hulbe _______________________________________ Keith S. Hadley Representative of the Office of Graduate Studies DEPARTMENTAL APPROVAL: _______________________________________ Michael L. Cummings, Chair Department of Geology ABSTRACT An abstract of the thesis of Thomas H. Nylen for the Master of Science in Geology presented October 25, 2001. Title: Spatial and Temporal Variations of Glaciers (1913-1994) on Mt. Rainier and the Relation with Climate Databases have been constructed for the purpose of studying glacier changes at Mt. Rainier. Glacier cover on Mt. Rainier decreased 18.5% (112.3 km2 to 88.1 km2) between 1913 and 1971 at a rate of about -0.36 km2 a-1. The total area in 1994 was 87.4 km2, which equates to a rate of -0.03 km2 a-1 since 1971. Glaciers with southerly aspect lost significantly more area than those with a northerly aspect, 26.5% and 17.5% of the total area, respectively. Measured and estimated total volumes for Mt. Rainier glaciers also decreased. From 1913 to 1971 the total volume decreased 22.7% from 5.62 km3 to 4.34 km3 and from 1971 to 1994 decreased 3.1% to 4.21 km3. Nisqually Glacier shows three cycles of retreat and advance but an overall loss of 0.44 km2 since 1931. Cross-correlation with snowfall suggests about a decade response time for the glaciers.
    [Show full text]
  • The Recession of Glaciers in Mount Rainier National Park, Washington
    THE RECESSION OF GLACIERS IN MOUNT RAINIER NATIONAL PARK, WASHINGTON C. FRANK BROCKMAN Mount Rainier National Park FOREWORD One of the most outstanding features of interest in Mount Rainier National Park is the extensive glacier system which lies, almost entirely, upon the broad flanks of Mount Rainier, the summit of which is 14,408 feet above sea-level. This glacier system, numbering 28 glaciers and aggregating approximately 40-45 square miles of ice, is recognized as the most extensive single peak glacier system in continental United States.' Recession data taken annually over a period of years at the termini of six representative glaciers of varying type and size which are located on different sides of Mount Rainier are indicative of the rela- tive rate of retreat of the entire glacier system here. At the present time the glaciers included in this study are retreating at an average rate of from 22.1 to 70.4 feet per year.2 HISTORY OF INVESTIGATIONS CONDUCTED ON THE GLACIERS OF MOUNT RAINIER Previous to 1900 glacial investigation in this area was combined with general geological reconnaissance surveys on the part of the United States Geological Survey. Thus, the activities of S. F. Em- mons and A. D. Wilson, of the Fortieth Parallel Corps, under Clarence King, was productive of a brief publication dealing in part with the glaciers of Mount Rainier.3 Twenty-six years later, in 1896, another United States Geological Survey party, which included Bailey Willis, I. C. Russell, and George Otis Smith, made additional SCircular of General Information, Mount Rainier National Park (U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Shriner Peak Fire Lookout 03/13/1991
    6/B2 National Park Service Westin Buildingding, 0^^920 I Aveni^^ WRO Pacific Northwest Region 2001 Sixth 1 SITE I D. NO INVENTORY Cultural Resources Division Seattle, Washington 98121 2 NAME(S) OF STRUCTURE (CARD 1 of 2) 5. ORIGINAL USE 7. CLASSIFICATION Shriner Peak Fire Lookout Fire Lookout 1932 3 SITE ADDRESS (STREET A NO) 6. PRESENT USE Fire Lookout Shriner Peak 0-052 and BackcounTi EASTING try Assistance COUNTY STATE SCALE 4 CITY/VICINITY 1 24 QUAD Ohanapecosh Lewis Washington OTHER , .NAME. 12 OWNER/AOMIN ADDRESS NPS/Mount Rainier National Park, Tahonia Woods-Star Route^ Ashford, WA., 98304 n ni r;rMiiMK)N and nACKr'.nnuNf) iiiruonv includini; crjN.-.mufuioN daims), mvsicAi oiMt nsions. maifmiai s, ma.kir ai ifraiions. fxiant f.ouipmfni. and IMPOniANI DUILDEHS. AMCMirFCrS. ENOINEERS. EIC Timber frame, two-story, square plan; hip roof, cedar shingles, projecting eaves; wrap around balcony, fixed sashes, rough lapped (Douglas Fir) exterior siding; wood floors, tongue-and-groove interior walls and ceilings; concrete foundation. In 1931 Superintendent O.A. Tomlinson reported that three fire lookouts were being manned by park personnel; Colonnades, Anvil Rock and Shriner Peak. Althdugh it is not known what kind of lookout existed then on Shrlner Peak, in 1932 a private contractor (engaged in road construction on the East Side Road) erected a new timber frame lookout. Measuring 14' X 14', it was built according to a standard design drafted by the National Park Service, Landscape Division (Branch of Plans and Design) in 1932. Thomas E. Carpenter, Landscape Architect recommended the design. Typically, the ground floor was used for storage and the one-room upper floor contained the fire finder, charts, supplies, a bed and cooking facilities.
    [Show full text]
  • Carbon River Access Management Plan
    United States Department of the Interior FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE Washington Fish and Wildlife Office 510 Desmond Dr. SE, Suite 102 Lacey, Washington 98 503 APR 2 6 20ll In Reply Refer To: 13410-2010-F-0488 Memorandum To: Superintendent, Mount Rainier National Park Ashford, Washington From: Manager, Washington Fish and Wildlife Lacey, Washington Subject: Biological Opinion for the Carbon River Access Management Plan This document transmits the Fish and Wildlife Service's Biological Opinion based on our review of the proposed Carbon River Access Managernent Plan to be implemented in Mount Rainier National Park, Pierce County, Washington. We evaluated effects on the threatened northern spotted owl (Sfrlx occidentalis caurina),marbled murrelet (Brachyramphus marmoratus),bttll trout (Salvelinus confluentus), and designated bull trout critical habitat in accordance with section 7 of the Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). Your July 29,2010 request for formal consultation was received on August 2,2010. This Biological Opinion is based on information provided in the June 28, 2010 Biological Assessment and on other information and correspondence shared between our respective staff. Copies of all correspondence regarding this consultation are on file at the Washington Fish and Wildlife Office in Lacey, Washington. If you have any questions about this mernorandum, the attached Biological Opinion, or your responsibilities under the Act, please contact Vince Harke at (360) 753-9529 or Carolyn Scafidi at (360) 753-4068. Endangered Species Act - Section 7 Consultation BIOLOGICAL OPINION U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Reference: 13410-2010-F-0488 Carbon River Access Management Plan Mount Rainier National Park Pierce County, Washington Agency: National Park Service Consultation Conducted By: U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Mount Rainier National Park, Washington
    NATIONAL PARK . WASHINGTON MOUNT RAINIER WASHINGTON CONTENTS "The Mountain" 1 Wealth of Gorgeous Flowers 3 The Forests 5 How To Reach the Park 8 By Automobile 8 By Railroad and Bus 11 By Airplane 11 Administration 11 Free Public Campgrounds 11 Post Offices 12 Communication and Express Service 12 Medical Service 12 Gasoline Service 12 What To Wear 12 Trails 13 Fishing 13 Mount Rainier Summit Climb 13 Accommodations and Expenses 15 Summer Season 18 Winter Season 18 Ohanapecosh Hot Springs 20 Horseback Trips and Guide Service 20 Transportation 21 Tables of Distances 23 Principal Points of Interest 28 References 32 Rules and Regulations 33 Events of Historical Importance 34 Government Publications 35 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR • Harold L. Ickes, Secretary NATIONAL PARK SERVICE Arno B. Cammerer, Director UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE • 1938 AN ALL-YEAR PARK Museums.—The park museum, headquarters for educational activities, MOUNT RAINIER NATIONAL PARK may be fully enjoyed throughout the and office of the park naturalist are located in the museum building at year. The summer season extends from early June to early November; the Longmire. Natural history displays and wild flower exhibits are main­ winter ski season, from late November well into May. All-year roads make tained at Paradise Community House, Yakima Park Blockhouse, and the park always accessible. Longmire Museum. Nisquaiiy Road is open to Paradise Valley throughout the year. During Hikes from Longmire.—Free hikes, requiring 1 day for the round trip the winter months this road is open to general traffic to Narada Falls, 1.5 are conducted by ranger naturalists from the museum to Van Trump Park, miles by trail from Paradise Valley.
    [Show full text]
  • Concept of Operations for Mount Rainier National Park Intelligent Transportation Systems Mount Rainier National Park
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Concept of Operations for Mount Rainier National Park Intelligent Transportation Systems Mount Rainier National Park Natural Resource Report NPS/NRR—2013/04 NPS D-XXX/XXXXXX & PMIS 88348 ON THE COVER Highway Advisory Radio Information Sign, Mount Rainier National Park Photograph by: Steve Lawson Concept of Operations for Mount Rainier National Park Intelligent Transportation Systems Mount Rainier National Park Natural Resource Report NPS/NRR—2013/04 NPS D-XXX/XXXXXX & PMIS 88348 Lawrence Harman1, Steve Lawson2, and Brett Kiser2 1Harman Consulting, LLC 13 Beckler Avenue Boston, MA 02127 2Resource Systems Group, Inc. 55 Railroad Row White River Junction, VT 05001 April 2013 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Stewardship and Science office in Fort Collins, Colorado, publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics. These reports are of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Report Series is used to disseminate high-priority, current natural resource management information with managerial application. The series targets a general, diverse audience, and may contain NPS policy considerations or address sensitive issues of management applicability. All manuscripts in the series receive the appropriate level of peer review to ensure that the information is scientifically credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and designed and published in a professional manner.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 New Chronologic and Geomorphic Analyses of Debris Flows on Mount
    New Chronologic and Geomorphic Analyses of Debris Flows on Mount Rainier, Washington By Ian Delaney Abstract Debris flows on Mount Rainier are thought to be increasing in frequency and magnitude in recent years, possibly due to retreating glaciers. These debris flows are caused by precipitation events or glacial outburst floods. Furthermore, as glaciers recede they leave steep unstable slopes of till providing the material needed for mass-wasting events. Little is known about the more distant history and downstream effects of these events. Field observations and/or aerial photograph of the Carbon River, Tahoma Creek, and White River drainages provide evidence of historic debris flow activity. The width and gradient of the channel on reaches of streams affected by debris flows is compared with reaches not affected by debris flows. In all reaches with field evidence of debris flows the average channel width is greater than in places not directly affected by debris flows. Furthermore, trends in width relate to the condition of the glacier. The stable Carbon Glacier with lots of drift at the terminus feeds the Carbon River, which has a gentle gradient and whose width remains relatively consistent over the period from 1952 to 2006. Conversely, the rapidly retreating Tahoma and South Tahoma Glaciers have lots of stagnant ice and feed the steep Tahoma Creek. Tahoma Creek’s width greatly increased, especially in the zone affect by debris flow activity. The rock-covered, yet relatively stable Emmons Glacier feeds White River, which shows relatively
    [Show full text]
  • Debris Properties and Mass-Balance Impacts on Adjacent Debris-Covered Glaciers, Mount Rainier, USA
    Natural Resource Ecology and Management Publications Natural Resource Ecology and Management 4-8-2019 Debris properties and mass-balance impacts on adjacent debris- covered glaciers, Mount Rainier, USA Peter L. Moore Iowa State University, [email protected] Leah I. Nelson Carleton College Theresa M. D. Groth Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/nrem_pubs Part of the Environmental Monitoring Commons, Glaciology Commons, Natural Resources Management and Policy Commons, and the Oceanography and Atmospheric Sciences and Meteorology Commons The complete bibliographic information for this item can be found at https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/ nrem_pubs/335. For information on how to cite this item, please visit http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/ howtocite.html. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Natural Resource Ecology and Management at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Natural Resource Ecology and Management Publications by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Debris properties and mass-balance impacts on adjacent debris-covered glaciers, Mount Rainier, USA Abstract The north and east slopes of Mount Rainier, Washington, are host to three of the largest glaciers in the contiguous United States: Carbon Glacier, Winthrop Glacier, and Emmons Glacier. Each has an extensive blanket of supraglacial debris on its terminus, but recent work indicates that each has responded to late twentieth- and early twenty-first-century climate changes in a different way. While Carbon Glacier has thinned and retreated since 1970, Winthrop Glacier has remained steady and Emmons Glacier has thickened and advanced.
    [Show full text]
  • Page 85 TITLE 16—CONSERVATION § 110C Main Fork of Ohanapecosh
    Page 85 TITLE 16—CONSERVATION § 110c main fork of Ohanapecosh River to the quarter and one-half acres, as generally depicted on the section line of section 9, township 14 north, map entitled ‘‘Mount Rainier National Park range 10 east, Willamette meridian; thence west- Proposed 1987 Boundary Adjustments’’, num- erly along the quarter section line of sections 9, bered 105–80,010B and dated January 1987, which 8, and 7 to the west boundary of said township; shall be on file and available for public inspec- thence due west to the right or west bank of tion in the Washington office of the National Muddy Fork of the Cowlitz River; thence north- Park Service, United States Department of the erly along the right bank of said Muddy Fork to Interior and at Mount Rainier National Park. a point exactly due east of post numbered 34 on (b) Forest boundary adjustment the south boundary of Mount Rainier National The boundaries of the Snoqualmie National Park as surveyed in 1908; thence due west to said Forest and of the Gifford Pinchot National For- post numbered 34; thence along the boundary of est, are hereby revised to include in the Sno- said park as surveyed in 1908 to post numbered qualmie National Forest approximately thirty- 35; thence easterly along the south boundary of one and one-half acres, to exclude from the Sno- said national park as surveyed in 1908 to the qualmie National Forest approximately thirty southeast corner thereof; thence northerly along acres, and to exclude from the Gifford Pinchot the east boundary of said national park as sur- National Forest approximately two hundred and veyed in 1908 to post numbered 59; thence along ten acres, as generally depicted on a map enti- the east boundary of said park as revised by sec- tled ‘‘Mount Rainier National Park Proposed tion 107 of this title, northerly to the point of 1987 Boundary Adjustments’’, numbered beginning.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparison of Glacier Fluctuations on Mount Rainier to Regional Glacial Histories
    A Comparison of Glacier Fluctuations on Mount Rainier to Regional Glacial Histories Mary A. Samolczyk Dept. of Geoscience, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada [email protected] and Gerald Osborn Dept. of Geoscience, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada and Brian Menounos Dept. of Geography, University of Northern British Columbia, Prince George, British Columbia, Canada and John Clague Dept. of Earth Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada and P. Thompson Davis Dept. of Natural Sciences, Bentley College, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA and Jon Riedel North Cascades National Park, Marblemount, Washington, USA And Joe Koch Dept. of Geography, Kwantlen Polytechnic University, Surrey, British Columbia, Canada Mount Rainier is a large stratovolcano located in Mount Rainier National Park in south-central Washington, USA. Mount Rainier is the highest peak in the Cascade Range, reaching a height of 4,395 meters (14,410 feet). The volcano is flanked by a greater volume of ice than any other mountain in the conterminous United States and has 26 named glaciers on its flanks. As a result, Mount Rainier provides an exceptional opportunity to study glacier fluctuations. Alpine glaciers are sensitive indicators of environmental change and respond to variations in climate by adjusting their width, length and thickness. A record of glacier fluctuations can be used to infer climate variability at timescales of decades to millennia. Glacial deposits, such as tills that form moraines, provide evidence of fluctuating glaciers since the retreat of the Cordilleran ice sheet in the latest Pleistocene after ca. 16 ka before present (Fulton, 1971) in the Central North American Cordillera (CNAC), which includes the Rocky, Columbia, Coast and Cascade mountain ranges.
    [Show full text]
  • 1912 the Mountaineers
    The Mountaineer. Volume Five Nineteen Hundred Twelve h611, •• , ,, The Mountaineen Sea11le. Wa1hla1100 :J1'.)1'1zec1 bv G oog I e 2,-�a""" ...._� _..,..i..c.. tyJ Vi) Copyright 1912 The Mountaineers Din,tiZ<'d by Google CONTENTS Page Greeting ................... ................................John Muir .......................................... Greeting ..................................................... Enos Mills ........................................ The Higher Functions of a Mountain Club................................................... \ Wm. Frederic Bade.......................... 9 Little Tahoma ............ ............................. .Edmond S. Meany............................ 13 Mountaineer Outing of 1912 on north side of Mt. Rainier....................... Mary Paschall ................................... 14 Itinerary of Outing of 1912................... .Charles S. Gleason........................... 26 The Ascent of Mt. Rainier.................... £. M.Hack ........................................ 28 Grand Park .............................................. 1=dmond S. Meany............................ 36 A New Route up Mt. Rainier.............. 'Jara Keen ........................................ 37 Naches Pass .............................................. Edmond S. Meany....... ,.................... 40 Undescribed Glaciers of Mt. Rainier .. Fran,ois Matthes ............................. 42 Thermal Caves ....................................... J. B. Flett .......................................... 58 Change in Willis
    [Show full text]