Historical Interpretations of the Gorbachev Era and the End of the Soviet Union: Secondary School History Education in Russia, 1991-2010
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by University of Saskatchewan's Research Archive Historical Interpretations of the Gorbachev Era and the End of the Soviet Union: Secondary School History Education in Russia, 1991-2010 A Thesis Submitted to the College of Graduate Studies and Research in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts Department of History University of Saskatchewan Crystal Amber Nataraj © Crystal Amber Nataraj, April 2011. All rights reserved. PERMISSION TO USE In presenting this thesis in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a Master’s of Arts Degree from the University of Saskatchewan, I agree that the Libraries of this University may make it freely available for inspection. I further agree that permission for copying of this thesis in any manner, in whole or in part, for scholarly purposes may be granted by the professor or professors who supervised my thesis work or, in their absence, by the Head of the Department of History. It is understood that any copying or publication or use of this thesis or parts thereof for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. It is also understood that due recognition shall be given to me and to the University of Saskatchewan in any scholarly use which may be made of any material in my thesis. Requests for permission to copy or to make other use of material in this thesis in whole or in part should be addressed to: Head of the Department of History University of Saskatchewan Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada S7N 5A5 i ABSTRACT The purpose of this research is to shed light on the formation of historical myths in Post- Soviet secondary school history classrooms from 1991 to 2010. Specifically, this thesis provides insight into how Russian high school teachers and textbook authors shaped historical interpretations of the perestroika era under the leadership of Mikhail S. Gorbachev and the dissolution of the Soviet Union. This case study of the teaching of the historical time period of 1985 to 1991 illuminates the ways in which Russians reinterpreted the final years of communist rule, as well as the dominant factors influencing those assessments, including memory and the state. The historical narratives taught in post-Soviet Russian classrooms, serve as an indicator of the evolution of democratic processes, national identity and historical consciousness in Russia. In addition to a survey of secondary source literature, my methodology includes the evaluation of interviews and surveys I conducted in 2009 and 2010 from over thirty secondary school history teachers in six Russian localities (in the Novosibirsk region, Moscow and St. Petersburg). I also assess the chapter contents of 15 widely-used high school history textbooks from the period of 1988 to 2009. In the newly democratic Russian state, the government (including the Ministry of Education) played a central role in the reform agenda of schools. During these formative decades, the process took a revolutionary pattern, with a radical, more liberal, stage of reform occurring in the early 1990s and a more conservative, traditional retreat taking place from the mid-1990s onwards. In response to society’s widespread discontent over the changes which took place in Russian schools in the 1990s, Presidents Vladimir V. Putin and Dmitri A. Medvedev took more active roles in education reform than their predecessor, Boris N. Yeltsin, especially in the realm of history education. Putin’s more centralized approach resulted in stricter controls on curriculum and textbook publication. Accordingly, history education was employed as a tool of the state to shape patriotic citizens through the restricting of various historical interpretations. “Gorbachev as leader,” “perestroika” and “the end of the Soviet Union” are controversial historical topics in Russia due to the social and economic upheaval that took place during and after these years. Textbook analysis of this period often reflected dominant political discourses in Russia. In the 1990s the interpretations were quite varied as Russians were unsure of how to assess such recent history. In the 2000s the textbook interpretations became more streamlined, ii and Gorbachev became a scapegoat for many subsequent state problems. In contrast, history teachers’ opinions about the Gorbachev era did not appear to change as markedly. Many factors weigh in on an individual’s interpretation of this historical period, but memory plays an especially prominent role in the teaching of the topic. Nevertheless, history teachers and textbook authors, reflecting Russian society at large, used historical myths in the teaching of the Gorbachev era, and this thesis documents these myths and sheds light on which were most prevalent and which lost favour. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First and foremost, I would like to thank Dr. Pamela Jordan for supervising me throughout my Master’s program and taking such care in helping me develop this research. Her comments and advice have only served to strengthen my academic capabilities. Professor Jordan’s depth of knowledge has been invaluable to me and the development of this thesis. Her commitment to quality research and writing is truly inspiring. I will be forever grateful to her for the encouragement and guidance. I would also like to extend sincere thanks and gratitude to Dr. John McCannon and Dr. Erika Dyck, supervisory committee members, for their feedback and comments throughout the development and writing of this thesis. I am also grateful for the insightful observations of the external examiner, Dr. Terry Wotherspoon. I greatly appreciate the entire committee’s hard work and dedication. This research was made possible through the financial support of the University of Saskatchewan’s Dean’s Scholarship and the Social Sciences and Humanities Council of Canada’s (SSHRC) Joseph-Armand Bombardier Canada Graduate Scholarship. I am very thankful to both institutions for their generous support. Additionally, I would like to thank SSHRC for awarding me the Michael Smith Foreign Study Supplement to conduct research in Russia. I also wish to thank Irina Khromova for acting as my host-supervisor while researching at Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University. Her enthusiasm to assist me with my research resulted in an extremely fulfilling academic experience abroad. I have also benefitted from numerous meetings and discussions with other Russian and Canadian colleagues and friends, to whom I am sincerely indebted. Thank you to my family and close friends for cheering me on the last few years. Special thanks to my mother Joan, who was always eager to proofread. Last but not least, I wish to thank my greatest supporter, my husband Richard, for tirelessly encouraging, motivating and supporting me throughout this endeavour. This is as much his achievement as it is mine. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS PERMISSION TO USE .......................................................................................................... i ABSTRACT ............................................................................................................................ ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ................................................................................................. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS ...................................................................................................... v CHAPTER 1: Introduction ................................................................................................... 1 Historiography ................................................................................................................ 3 Research Methods ......................................................................................................... 10 CHAPTER 2: Traditions in Soviet Education .................................................................. 13 Revolutionary Times Under Lenin .............................................................................. 17 A Conservative Retreat Under Stalin ......................................................................... 19 Khrushchev’s Thaw ...................................................................................................... 20 Conservative Policies Under Brezhnev ....................................................................... 21 The Restructuring of Education Under Gorbachev .................................................. 22 Conclusion ..................................................................................................................... 25 CHAPTER 3: Post-Soviet Education Reform ................................................................... 26 Revolutionary Patterns................................................................................................. 27 Education Reforms Under Yeltsin (1991 to 1999) ..................................................... 28 Modernization Under Putin and Medvedev (2000 to 2010) ...................................... 37 Conclusion ..................................................................................................................... 40 CHAPTER 4: Russian History Education in Post-Soviet Times ..................................... 42 History Education Reforms from 1991 to 1999 .......................................................... 45 History Classrooms from 1991 to 1999 ....................................................................... 52 History Education Reforms from 2000 to 2010 .........................................................