DOCSLIB.ORG

Arxiv:1912.04798V3 [Quant-Ph] 5 Aug 2021 the KLOE Experiment and Its Successor KLOE-2 [7–9] at Nel at T1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Arxiv:1912.04798V3 [Quant-Ph] 5 Aug 2021 the KLOE Experiment and Its Successor KLOE-2 [7–9] at Nel at T1 Can Future Observation of the Living Partner Influence the Past Decayed State in Entangled Neutral K-Mesons ? Jose Bernabeu∗ Department of Theoretical Physics, University of Valencia, and IFIC, Univ. Valencia-CSIC, E-46100 Burjassot, Valencia, Spain Antonio Di Domenicoy Department of Physics, Sapienza University of Rome, and INFN Sezione di Roma, P.le A. Moro, 2, I-00185 Rome, Italy Entangled neutral K-mesons allow the study of their correlated dynamics at interference and decoherence times not accessible in any other system. We find novel quantum phenomena associated to a correlation-in-time between the two partners: the past state of the first decayed Kaon, when it was entangled before its decay, is influenced by the result and the time of the future observation of the second decay channel. This surprising \from future to past" effect is fully observable and leads to the unique experimental tag of the KS-state, an unsolved problem since the discovery of CP violation. Since long ago, several authors have stated the cru- associated to each part of the system. cial role that the neutral kaon system has played for un- The methodology that we follow consists in comparing derstanding the intrincacies of the quantum world. In the description of the double decay distribution at times particular the words of R. Feynman [1], T.D. Lee [2] t1, t2 with ∆t = t2 −t1 > 0 using (i) the formalism of the and L. B. Okun [3] are all emphasising the uniqueness two decay times state first introduced by Lee and Yang of this system as a jewel donated to us by nature. They (LY) [21{24] with (ii) the time history (TH) of the en- were referring to the peculiar properties of single neutral tangled state from the coherent correlated neutral kaon kaon states, which display several rare phenomena like system until its fate. The quantum consistency of the two the strangeness oscillation, the tiny mass splitting and approaches and the t1, t2 symmetry of the first approach, the large difference in lifetimes of the physical states, the with no special role of one of the two decay times, natu- violation of the fundamental discrete symmetries Charge- rally demand the study of a novel problem: is it possible Parity (CP) and Time-Reversal (T ), the regeneration to infer the initial kaon state previous to the first decay when traversing a slab of material. at t1 from the observation of the second decay at time The present research is related to another peculiar t2 > t1, i.e. a correlation able to provide information character of neutral kaons: the \strange entanglement", from the future to the past? Contrary to the informa- i.e. the entanglement which is specific to two neutral tion from the past to the future, i.e., the prediction of kaon systems with all the interconnections with the above the kaon state at time t2 from the observation of the first properties. It is worth reminding here that the entan- decay at time t1, the question formulated in this paper glement is one of the most striking feature of quantum involves information on a part of the system at times in mechanics, as stressed by E. Schr¨odinger[4], in reply to which the state was still fully entangled, i.e. before the the famous argument by A. Einstein, B. Podolsky and N. first decay, when asking which is which is considered to Rosen [5] (EPR) based on local realism. be unspeakable in John Bell's terminology [25]. The experimental investigation of strange entangle- In the following, first we analyze the correlation from ment started more than two decades ago with the past to future, i.e. which is the state before the second CPLEAR experiment [6] at CERN, and continued with decay at t2, from the observation of the first decay chan- arXiv:1912.04798v3 [quant-ph] 5 Aug 2021 the KLOE experiment and its successor KLOE-2 [7{9] at nel at t1. Then we infer the correlation from future to the DAΦNE φ-factory [10{12], yielding several precision past, i.e. which is the state before the first decay at t1, results [13{20]. from the observation of the second decay channel at t2. The characteristic behaviour of strange entanglement, We identify the decoherence region in ∆t in which the with the peculiar properties of neutral kaons not found surviving correlation tells us KL at t2 and KS at t1, pro- in any other system, makes possible the exploration of viding the unique way to tag a KS experimentally. We novel phenomena: the surviving correlation-in-time from summarize the results presenting some final remarks and the observation of the future decay of the living partner our conclusion. at a given time to the identification of the past kaon state We consider an entangled two body neutral kaon sys- leading to the first decay. This from the future to the past tem, as actually realised at DAΦNE, with φ ! K0K¯ 0 de- information in a system with non-trivial time evolution, cays, the source of EPR coherent K0K¯ 0 pairs in the C = −1 antisymmetric state: jii = p1 fjK0ijK¯ 0i − jK¯ 0ijK0ig. entering into times in which the system was still entan- 2 gled, could contribute to unveil the kind of reality to be Under particle exchange we call particle-1 the first one 2 to decay at time t1, particle-2 the last to decay at time therefore identically given in terms of any two generic t2. We remind the reader that Quantum Entanglement linearly independent neutral kaon states, orthogonal is associated to Non-Separability in two aspects: (i) we or not. As a particular case, it can be written in cannot identify which is which due to indistinguishability, terms of the KS,KL states with definite time evolu- and (ii) we cannot specify the two parts of the system tion [26]: jii = pN fjK ijK i − jK ijK ig with jN j2 = 2 S L L S which are not definite, showing that the parts have no 2−1 1 − jhKSjKLij ' 1 . As a consequence, the entan- local physical reality. gled state jii at any time t after its production remains In fact, the antisymmetric state jii is unique and unaltered, even in presence of K0 − K¯ 0 mixing: N −iλS t −iλLt −iλLt −iλS t −i(λS +λL)t ji(t)i = p fjKSie jKLie − jKLie jKSie g = e jii: (1) 2 If nothing is registered after the observation of the first This also holds for any decay channel t1-distribution with decay at time t1 (i.e. integrating over all subsequent de- no other subsequent observation. cays at times t2 of particle-2), the survival probability of Two decay times state formalism (LY).{ Following the the entangled state is necessarily characterised by the to- LY approach of the two decay times entangled state (1), −Γt1 tal width Γ = ΓS +ΓL of the system [27]: P (t1) = e . the correlated state of the two partners decaying at times t1 and t2 can be formally written as [21{24]: N −iλS t1 −iλLt2 −iλLt1 −iλS t2 jit ;t i = p fjKSie jKLie − jKLie jKSie g: (2) 1 2 2 The two decay times formalism defines in the combined measurement and its associated projection. Accordingly, two terms of the entangled state (1) what one calls the decay amplitude of the initial state jii to channel particle-1 { the first one to decay { and particle-2 { the f1 at time t1 for particle-1 and channel f2 at time t2 second one to decay. The (formal) use as evolution times for particle-2, and the corresponding observable double is justified because they are disjoint and there is no over- differential decay rate I(f1; t1; f2; t2) can be readily cal- lap between them: t1 before, and t2 after, the performed culated [28]: 2 2 I(f1; t1; f2; t2)LY = jhf1(t1)f2(t2)jT ji(t)ij = jhf1f2jT jit1;t2 ij (ΓS +ΓL) 2 −ΓLt1−ΓS t2 2 −ΓS t1−ΓLt2 − (t1+t2) = C12fjη1j e + jη2j e − 2jη1jjη2je 2 cos[∆m∆t + φ1 − φ2]g; (3) with hfijT jKSi and hfijT jKLi the decay amplitudes to As a corollary of the above approach one can notice iφi hfijT jKLi the fi channel of KS and KL, ηi ≡ jηije = ; that at an intermediate step of the calculation { after hfijT jKSi 2 jN j 2 the first decay at time t1 { the state of the surviving and C12 = jhf1jT jKSihf2jT jKSij : 2 kaon (particle-2) immediately before its decay at time t2 is expressed as: N (2) −i(λS +λL)t1 −iλL∆t −iλS ∆t jK (t = t2)i = hf1jT jit ;t i = p hf1jT jKSie e jKLi − η1e jKSi : (4) 1 2 2 Keeping t1 and f1 fixed { the observation { and renor- malising the state at time t2 = t1, it corresponds to the 3 evolution from time t1 to time t2 of the pure state two orthogonal states as: 1 ? ? (2) jii = p fjK f ijK f i − jK f ijK f ig ; (8) jK (t = t1)i = N2 [jKLi − η1jKSi] ; (5) 2 9 9 9 9 the first decay to f1 at time t1 tags the state of the sur- with N2 a suitable normalization factor. This is precisely viving partner as given by Eq.(7) with f = f1 and filters the state of the living particle-2 which cannot decay to at the same time { on an event-by-event basis { the state f1, as a result of the projection by the decay of particle- jK? i in the decayed kaon, as a result of the observation 9f1 1 at t1 as a filtering measurement { see eqs.(7) and (8) of the f1 channel.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ANTIMATTER a Review of Its Role in the Universe and Its Applications
    A review of its role in the ANTIMATTER universe and its applications THE DISCOVERY OF NATURE’S SYMMETRIES ntimatter plays an intrinsic role in our Aunderstanding of the subatomic world THE UNIVERSE THROUGH THE LOOKING-GLASS C.D. Anderson, Anderson, Emilio VisualSegrè Archives C.D. The beginning of the 20th century or vice versa, it absorbed or emitted saw a cascade of brilliant insights into quanta of electromagnetic radiation the nature of matter and energy. The of definite energy, giving rise to a first was Max Planck’s realisation that characteristic spectrum of bright or energy (in the form of electromagnetic dark lines at specific wavelengths. radiation i.e. light) had discrete values The Austrian physicist, Erwin – it was quantised. The second was Schrödinger laid down a more precise that energy and mass were equivalent, mathematical formulation of this as described by Einstein’s special behaviour based on wave theory and theory of relativity and his iconic probability – quantum mechanics. The first image of a positron track found in cosmic rays equation, E = mc2, where c is the The Schrödinger wave equation could speed of light in a vacuum; the theory predict the spectrum of the simplest or positron; when an electron also predicted that objects behave atom, hydrogen, which consists of met a positron, they would annihilate somewhat differently when moving a single electron orbiting a positive according to Einstein’s equation, proton. However, the spectrum generating two gamma rays in the featured additional lines that were not process. The concept of antimatter explained. In 1928, the British physicist was born.
    [Show full text]
  • Andreas Meyer Hamburg University
    CP/ Part 1 Andreas Meyer Hamburg University DESY Summer Student Lectures, 1+4 August 2003 (this file including slides not shown in the lecture) CP-Violation Violation of Particle Anti-particle Symmetry Friday: Symmetries • Parity-Operation and Charge-Conjugation • The neutral K-Meson-System • Discovery of CP-violation (1964) • CP-Violation in the Standard model • Measurements at the CPLEAR Experiment (CP Violation in K 0-Mixing) • Slides only: Latest Results from NA48 (CP Violation in K 0-Decays) • Monday: Recap: Discovery of CP-Violation • The neutral B-Meson-System • CKM Matrix and Unitarity Triangle • Prediction for the B-System from K-Results • B-Factories BaBar and Belle (Test of Standard Model) • Future Experiments, CP-Violation in the Lepton-Sector? • Summary • The Universe Matter exceeds Antimatter, why? Big-Bang model: Creation of matter and antimatter in equal amounts • Baryogenesis: Where did the antimatter go? • Three necessary conditions for Baryogenesis: A. Sacharov, 1967 Baryon-number violation • no problem for gauge theories but not seen yet Thermodynamical non-equilibrium • C and CP-violation (!) • What is CP-Violation? CP: Symmetry between Particles and Antiparticles CP-Symmetry is known to be broken: The Universe • { Matter only, no significant amount of antimatter The neutral K-Meson (most of todays lecture) • { discovered 1964 (Fitch, Cronin, Nobel-Prize 1980) { almost 40 years of K-physics with increasing precision The neutral B-Meson (on Monday) • { measured 2001 (expected in Standard Model) Symmetry Image = Mirror-Image
    [Show full text]
  • CP Violation in K Decays: Experimental Aspects
    CP violation in K decays: experimental aspects M. Jeitler Institute for High Energy Physics, Vienna, Austria Abstract CP violation was originally discovered in neutral K mesons. Over the last few years, it has also been seen in B mesons, and most of the research in the field is currently concentrating on the B system. However, there are some parameters which could be best measured in kaons. In order to see to which extent our present understanding of CP violation within the framework of the CKM matrix is correct, one has to check for possible differences between the K system and the B system. After an historical overview, I discuss a few of the most important recent results, and give an outlook on experiments that are being prepared. 1 The discovery of CP violation Symmetries are a salient feature of our world, but so is the breaking of approximate symmetries. Still, for a long time physicists believed that at the level of elementary particles, a high level of symmetry should prevail. In particular, it was expected that all fundamental interactions should be symmetric under the discrete transformations of spatial inversion (parity transformation P), substitution of antiparticles for particles (charge conjugation C), and time inversion (T). However, in 1956 Lee and Yang concluded from experimental data that the weak interactions might not be invariant under spatial inversion, in other words that parity might be violated. This was then explicitly shown in an experiment by Wu in 1957 [1]. For a few years, physicists were inclined to believe that although parity was broken, this symme- try violation was exactly compensated by the charge symmetry violation, and that the symmetry under a combined charge and parity transformation (CP) was exactly conserved.
    [Show full text]
  • Measurements of Discrete Symmetries in the Neutral Kaon System with the CPLEAR (PS195) Experiment
    Measurements of Discrete Symmetries in the Neutral Kaon System with the CPLEAR (PS195) Experiment Thomas Ruf CERN, CH-1211, Geneva 23, Switzerland [email protected] The antiproton storage ring LEAR offered unique opportunities to study the symmetries which exist between matter and antimatter. At variance with other approaches at this facility, CPLEAR was an experiment devoted to the study of T , CPT and CP symmetries in the neutral kaon system. It measured with high precision the time evolution of initially strangeness-tagged K0 and K0 states to determine the size of violations with respect to these symmetries in the context of a systematic study. In parallel, limits concerning quantum-mechanical predictions (EPR paradox, coherence of the wave function) or the equivalence principle of general relativity have been obtained. This article will first discuss briefly the unique low energy antiproton storage ring LEAR followed by a description of the CPLEAR experiment, including the basic formalism necessary to understand the time evolution of a neutral kaon state and the main results related to measurements of discrete symmetries in the neutral kaon system. An excellent and exhaustive review of the CPLEAR experiment and all its measurements is given in Ref. 1. 1. The Low Energy Antiproton Ring The Low Energy Antiproton Ring (LEAR)2, 3 decelerated and stored antiprotons for eventual extraction to the experiments located in the South Hall. It was built in 1982 and operated until 1996, when it was converted into the Low Energy Ion Ring (LEIR), which provides lead-ion injection for the Large Hadron Collider (LHC). Under the LEAR programme, four machines — the Proton Synchrotron (PS), 60 Years of CERN Experiments and Discoveries Downloaded from www.worldscientific.com the Antiproton Collector (AC), the Antiproton Accumulator (AA), and LEAR — worked together to collect, cool and decelerate antiprotons for use in experiments.
    [Show full text]
  • 389 the CPLEAR Experiment at CERN Studies the CP, T and CPT
    389 RESULTS FROM CP, T AND CPT MEASUREMENTS AT CPLEAR Christos Touramanis PPE Division, CERN, CH1211 Geneva 23, Switzerland for the CPLEAR collaboration R. Adler', T. Alhalel2 , A. Angelopoulos1 , A. Apostolakis1, E. Aslanides11, G. Backenstoss2 , C.P. Bee2 , Behnke 11, 0. A. Benelli 9, V. Bertin11, F. Blanc7•13, P. Bloch\ Ch. Bula13, P. Carlson", M. Carroll9 J. Carvalho', E. Cawley9, S. Charalarnbous16, M. Chardalas16, G. Chardin1\ M.B. Chertok3, A. Cody9, M. Danielsson15, S. Dedoussis16, M. Dejardin14, J. Derre14, Duclos14, A. Ealet11 , B. Eckart', C. Eleftheriadis16, I. Evangelou8 , L. Faravel 7, J. P. Fassnacht11, J .L. Faure14, C. Felder2, R. Ferreira-Marques5, W. Fetscher17, M. Fidecaro4, A. FilipCiC10 1 D. Francis3 , Fry9, E. Gabathuler9, R. Gamet9, D. Garreta14, H.-J. Gerber17, A. Go15, C. Guyot14, A. Haselden9, J. P.J. Hayrnan9, F. Henry-Couannier11 , R.W. Hollander6,E. Hubert11, K. Jon-And15, P.-R. Kettle13, C. Kochowski14, P. Kokkas5, R. Kreuger6, R. Le Gac11, F. Leirngruber',A. Liolios16, E. Machado5, I. Mandic10, N. Manthos8, G. Marei14, M. Mikuz10, J. Miller3 , F. Montanet11, T. Nakada13, A. Onofre', B. Pagels 17, I. Papadopoulos16, P. Pavlopoulos', J. Pinto da Cunha5, A. Policarpo', G. Polivka' , R. Rickenbach', B.L. Roberts", E. Rozaki', T. Ruf\ L. Sakeliou', P. Sanders9, C. Santoni', K. Sarigiannis1, M. Schii.fer17, L.A. Schaller7, A. Schopper\ P. Schune1\ A. Soares14, L. Tauscher2, C. Thibault12, F. To uchard1\ C. Touramanis\ F. Triantis8, E. Van Beveren5, C.W.E. Van Eijk6, G. Varner", S. Vlachos' , P. Weber17, Wigger13, M. Wolter'7, C. Yeche14, 0. D. Zavrtanik10 and D. Zimmerman3 ABSTRACT The CPLEAR experiment at CERN studies the CP, T and CPT symmetries in the neutral K0 K0• kaon system using initially tagged and Results from the 1990 to 1993 data on 71+-• Am and are reported, as well as the first direct measurement of T violation and 71+-o , x cs.
    [Show full text]
  • Testing Discrete Symmetries in K Decays
    ,fe-a very successful theory for physics phe­ nomena, valid for many human applica­ Testing discrete symmetries tions. What about the symmetry proper­ ties ofthe other theories? There is an im­ portanttheorem,known as the CPT theo­ in Kdecays rem, which states that, under very general assumptions, any theory of microscopic P. DEBU - (EA Saclay - France interactions must respect the CPT sym­ February 7,2000 metry. This means that in the present day the­ oretical framework ofparticle physics, it is Discrete symmetries, P and C Weak interactions and violation of P and believed that the laws of physics are in­ hen physicists try to lay down the Csymmetries variant under CPT. Wlaws that govern the processes they There are four known fundamental As a consequence, CP symmetry im­ are studying, they use as a first guidance interactions between elementary plies T symmetry, andvice-versa, because the most general properties ofthe system. particles. Gravitation is felt by all any CP violation should be compensated There are fundamental and universal particles. Charged particles undergo by some T violation to follow the CPT the­ examples. The laws ofNature are believed electromagnetic interactions. The orem. to be independent of the position of the protons and the neutron are bound in The 1957 observation that CP symme­ observer, or of his orientation. One says nuclei by the strong interaction. Weak trystill holds could be seen as a necessary that they are invariant by translation and interactions transform quarks into one consequence that microscopic phenome­ rotation. another and cause the f3 decays of na obey the T symmetry.
    [Show full text]
  • Heavy-Quark Physics and Cp Violation
    COURSE HEAVYQUARK PHYSICS AND CP VIOLATION Jerey D Richman University of California y Santa Barbara California USA y Email richmancharmphysicsucsbedu c Elsevier Science BV Al l rights reserved Photograph of Lecturer Contents Intro duction Roadmap and Overview of Bottom and Charm Physics Intro duction to the Cabibb oKobayashiMaskawa Matrix and a First Lo ok at CP Violation Exp erimental Challenges and Approaches in HeavyQuark Physics Historical Persp ective Bumps in the Road and Lessons in Data Analysis Avery short history of heavyquark physics Bumps in the road case studies Some rules for data analysis Leptonic Decays Intro duction to leptonic decays Measurements of leptonic decays Lattice calculations of leptonic decay constants Semileptonic Decays Intro duction to semileptonic decays Dynamics of semileptonic decay Heavy quark eective theory and semileptonic decays Inclusive semileptonic decay and jV j cb Leptonendp oint region in semileptonic B deca y and jV j ub Form factors and kinematic distributions for exclusive semileptonic decay HQET predictions and the IsgurWise function Exclusive semileptonic decay jV j and jV j cb ub Hadronic Decays Lifetimes and Rare Decays Hadronic Decays Lifetimes Rare decays CP Violation and Oscillations Intro duction to CP violation CP violation and cosmology CP violation in decay direct CP violation CP violation in mixing indirect CP violation Phenomenology of mixing CP violation due to interference b etween mixing and decay Acknowledgements
    [Show full text]
  • CPLEAR Results on the CP Parameters of Neutral Kaons Decaying to Π+Π−Π0 R
    CPLEAR results on the CP parameters of neutral kaons decaying to π+π−π0 R. Adler, A. Angelopoulos, A. Apostolakis, E. Aslanides, G. Backenstoss, P. Bargassa, C P. Bee, O. Behnke, A. Benelli, V. Bertin, et al. To cite this version: R. Adler, A. Angelopoulos, A. Apostolakis, E. Aslanides, G. Backenstoss, et al.. CPLEAR results on the CP parameters of neutral kaons decaying to π+π−π0. Physics Letters B, Elsevier, 1997, 407, pp.193-200. in2p3-00000063 HAL Id: in2p3-00000063 http://hal.in2p3.fr/in2p3-00000063 Submitted on 16 Nov 1998 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. EUROPEAN ORGANIZATION FOR NUCLEAR RESEARCH CERN–PPE/97–54 12 May 1997 + 0 CPLEAR results on the CP parameters of neutral kaons decaying to The CPLEAR Collaboration 1 1 11 2 R. Adler 2 , A. Angelopoulos , A. Apostolakis ,E.Aslanides , G. Backenstoss , 9 17 9 11 7;13 P. Bargassa13 ,C.P.Bee,O.Behnke ,A.Benelli ,V.Bertin ,F.Blanc , 15 9 5 9 16 P. Bloch 4 ,P.Carlson ,M.Carroll,J.Carvalho,E.Cawley, S. Charalambous , 3 9 15 14 14 G.
    [Show full text]
  • The CPLEAR Collaboration Athens, Basel, Boston, DAPNINSPP-Saclay
    371 THE STUDY THE CP, T AND CPT SYMMETRIES OFTHE CPLEAR EXPERIMENT IN The CPLEAR Collaboration Athens, Basel, Boston, DAPNINSPP-Saclay, Coimbra, Delft, Elli-IMP Zilrich, Fribourg, 1N2P3/CPPM-Marseille, IN2P3/CSNSM-Orsay,CERN, Ioannina, Liverpool, Ljubljana, PSI, MSI-Stockholm,Thessaloniki R. Adler, T. Alhalel, A. Angelopoulos, A. Apostolakis, E. Aslanides, G. Backenstoss, C.P.Bee, Behnke, J. Bennet, Bertin, Blanc, P. Bloch, Ch. Bula, P. Carlson, M. Carroll J. Carvalho, Cawley, E. 0. S. Charalambous, M. Chardalas,G. Chardin, M.B. Chertok, M. Danielsson, A. Cody, S. Dedoussis, V. F. M. De ardin, J. Derre,M. Dodgson, Duclos, A. et, B. C. Eleftheriadis, I. Evangelou, L. Faravel, P. Fassnacht, J.L. C. Felder, R. Ferreira-Marques, Fetscher, M. Fidecaro, F l i Francis, Faure, W. A. i i D. j J. Eal Eckart, . Fry, E. Gabathuler, R. Gamet, Garreta, T. Geralis, H.-J. Gerber, A. Go, P. Gumplinger, C. Guyot, D. ¢ � A. Haselden, Hayman, Henry-Couannier, R.W. Hollander,E. Hoben, K. Jansson, H.U. Johner, J. PJ. F. K. Jon-And, P. R. Kettle, C. Kochowski, Kokkas, R. Kreuger, T. Lawry, R. Gae, Leimgruber, Le F. A. Liolios, E. Machado, P. Maley, I. N. G. Marel, M. Miku�. J. Miller, Montane!, P. F. T. A. Onofre, B. Pagels, P. Pavlopoulos, Pelucchi, J. Pinto Cunha, A. Policarpo, G. Polivka, Mandie, Manthos,F. H. Postma, R. Rickenbach, B.L. Robens, E. Rozaki, Ruf, L. Sacks, L. Sakeliou, P. Sanders, C. Santoni, Nakada, T. da K. Sarigiannis, M. Schafer, L.A. Schaller, A. Schopper, P. Schone, A. Soares, L. Tauscher, C.
    [Show full text]
  • ANTIMATTER and GRAVITATION 1 Scientific Aim 1.1 the Equivalence
    ANTIMATTER AND GRAVITATION P. DEBU Direction de la recherche fondamentale, CEA Saclay, 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette cedex, France Three experiments et CERN are about to “weight” antihydrogen. We describe the objectives of the experiments trying to measure the gravitation effect on antimatter, we review some of the theoretical constraints on a possible different gravitational behavior between matter and antimatter, and give an overview of the existing experimental limits and proposals. 1 Scientific aim 1.1 The Equivalence Principle The main objective of the measurement of the action of gravity on antimatter is to perform a direct test with antimatter of the Einstein Equivalence Principle which states that the trajectory of a test particle is independant of its composition and internal structure when its is solely subject to gravitational forces. This principle has been verified with many materials. A very high precision of around 10−13 has been reached. A torsion pendulum experiment 1 with Beryllium and Titanium test bodies led to the following difference between their gravitational acceleration: −13 (∆a=a)Be=Ti = (0:3 ± 1:8) × 10 : (1) A precise follow up of the relative motion of the Earth and the Moon (“Lunar Laser Ranging” 2) gave: −13 (∆a=a)Earth=Moon = (−1:0 ± 1:4) × 10 : (2) 1.2 Antimatter In the Standard Model of particle physics, every particle comes with its own antiparticle which carries an opposite charge but, as stated by the CPT theorem, has exactly the same inertial mass and the same lifetime. The most stringent limit on the inertial mass equality is 3: −19 (MK0 − MK¯0 )=Maverage < 6 × 10 (90 % CL): (3) As we will see, there is nos such comparison for the particle and its antiparticle gravitational mass, a quantity which we define in the next section.
    [Show full text]
  • Glasgow Conference
    Glasgow conference Pierre Darriulat of CERN gives the summary talk at this year's International Conference on High Energy Physics, held in Glasgow. (Photos University of Glasgow) he biennial 'Rochester' Interna­ T tional Conferences on High Energy Physics which tick the rhythm of high energy physics progress reflect the dominance of the 'Standard Model' - the picture of electroweak and quark/gluon interactions in a simple framework of six weakly- interacting particles (leptons) and six quarks. Despite its limited intellectual appeal, after a decade of intense probing the Standard Model still refuses to budge. This year's Rochester event, held in Glasgow from 20-27 July, followed the trend. But conformity is not a synonym for a physics vacuum. The advent of high precision data from big colliding beam experiments provides a treasure trove of detailed information on particle characteristics and decays, so that Standard Model physics becomes charted in finer and which has already definitely ruled out for the top quark but does not firmly finer detail. (A preliminary Glasgow the top quark being lighter than 131 establish its existence,' declared report appeared last month, page 1.) GeV. Jensen. However the map is far from com­ After careful elimination of back­ Seven CDF events have enough plete, and as Glasgow summarizer ground effects in the initial data kinematical information to calculate Pierre Darriulat of CERN concluded, sample, CDF found two spectacular the top quark mass, giving a value of there is a lot to do while waiting for events producing an electron and a 174 GeV ± 10%. the next round, which will begin in muon, but none with an electron or a DO reports one example of a muon- about ten years when CERN's LHC muon pair.
    [Show full text]
  • Parity Violation
    Parity violation • Wu experiment: b decay of polarized nuclei of Cobalt: Co (spin 5) decays to Ni (spin 4), electron and anti-neutrino (spin ½) • Parity changes the helicity (H). Ø P-conservation assumes a symmetry between the left and right handed particles, e.g. counting rates for LH and RH electrons are the same �$ �" Co Ni �$ �" no left-handed �$ are produced Charge conjugation violation • Lederman et al (1957) C-violation in charged pion decays to muons and neutrinos • Charge conjugation replaces particles with anti-particles CP is conserved no left-handed neutrinos and right-handed anti-neutrinos are observed – C-violation https://journals.aps.org/pr/pdf/10.1103/PhysRev.105.1415 CP Violation in the Early Universe • Very early in the universe might expect equal numbers of baryons and anti-baryons, which would all annihilate to photons • The universe is matter dominated (no evidence for anti-galaxies, etc.) • From “Big Bang Nucleosynthesis” obtain the matter/anti-matter asymmetry i.e. for every baryon in the universe today there are photons • How did this happen? « Early in the universe need to create a very small asymmetry between baryons and anti-baryons, e.g. for every 109 anti-baryons there were 109+1 baryons baryons/anti-baryons annihilate 1 baryon + ~109 photons + no anti-baryons « To generate this initial asymmetry three conditions must be met (Sakharov, 1967): • CP Violation is an essential aspect of our understanding of the universe • A natural question is whether the SM of particle physics can provide the necessary CP violation? • There are two places in the SM where CP violation enters: the PMNS matrix and the CKM matrix • To date CP violation has been observed only in the quark sector • Because we are dealing with quarks, which are only observed as bound states, this is a fairly complicated subject.
    [Show full text]