Teamwork During Cardiopulmonary Resuscitations at a Rural
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
TEAMWORK DURING CARDIOPULMONARY RESUSCITATIONS AT A RURAL MINNESOTA HOSPITAL A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the North Dakota State University of Agriculture and Applied Science By Kayla Dale Dascher In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF NURSING PRACTICE Major Department: Nursing March 2015 Fargo, North Dakota North Dakota State University Graduate School Title Teamwork During Cardiopulmonary Resuscitations At A Rural Minnesota Hospital By Kayla Dale Dascher The Supervisory Committee certifies that this disquisition complies with North Dakota State University’s regulations and meets the accepted standards for the degree of DOCTOR OF NURSING PRACTICE SUPERVISORY COMMITTEE: Dr. Mykell Barnacle Chair Dr. Tina Lundeen Professor Kara Falk Dr. Daniel Klenow Approved: March 25, 2015 Dr. Carla Gross Date Department Chair ABSTRACT Cardiac arrest is a major public health problem affecting thousands of individuals each year in both out-of-hospital and in-hospital settings (Sutton, Nadkarni, & Abella, 2012). In 2012 nearly 383,000 out-of-hospital sudden cardiac arrests occurred and approximately 209,000 cardiac arrests occurred within a hospital (American Heart Association, 2012). Survival rates from cardiac arrest are improving, however overall rates of survival are still low (American Heart Association, 2012). The purpose of this project was to enhance the teamwork, knowledge, and technical skills of all individuals involved in cardiopulmonary resuscitations at the project site. Expectations of the project were to (1) enhance cardiopulmonary resuscitation knowledge by providing evidence- based resources to team members, (2) clearly delineate roles of team members during resuscitations, and (3) develop a continuing education plan that will ensure the maintenance of quality cardiac resuscitations. A survey to assess the needs of the cardiac resuscitation team members was distributed to all providers at the project site as well as all staff registered nurses, pharmacists, respiratory therapists, nurse anesthetists, and hospital unit coordinators. The survey results identified the nurses’ perception that the providers lack leadership skills during resuscitations. Many survey responses noted confusion about the role of each individual during resuscitations. Nurses felt lack of confidence in knowledge of medications, as well as mixing and titration of medications. Based on feedback from the survey, six mock resuscitation/simulations were facilitated utilizing four scenarios that were developed. Following each mock resuscitation/simulation, a debriefing occurred utilizing a debriefing tool. A post mock resuscitation survey was administered at the completion of the project. Eleven surveys were returned. Results of the iii project were overall positive. Evidence based resources were developed and utilized by providers and nursing during both mock and actual resuscitations. Posters were developed and placed in the emergency department that clearly delineated each participant’s role. A continuing education plan based upon feedback from a post resuscitation survey was developed. The continuing education plan includes having mock resuscitations/simulations once per month at various times of the day to accommodate all staff. iv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This project involved the assistance of many individuals. I would like to acknowledge the chair of my committee, Dr. Mykell Barnacle. Dr. Barnacle was a wonderful resource and without her patience and guidance this would not have been possible. I would also like to recognize the other members in my committee: Dr. Tina Lundeen, Professor Kara Falk, Dr. Daniel Klenow, and Roxanna Holper. This project wouldn’t have been successful without the support and participation from the organization that participated in this endeavor, Mayo Clinic Health System in Lake City. Specifically Maura McCabe, nursing education specialist, and Roxanna Holper were instrumental in making this project successful. v TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT .................................................................................................................................. iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ............................................................................................................... v CHAPTER 1. BACKGROUND AND SIGNIFICANCE ............................................................... 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 1 Statement of the Problem ............................................................................................................ 2 Purpose of Clinical Dissertation Project ...................................................................................... 3 CHAPTER 2. LITERATURE REVIEW AND THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK ....................... 4 Team and Teamwork ................................................................................................................... 4 Leadership ................................................................................................................................... 6 Simulation.................................................................................................................................... 9 Debriefing .................................................................................................................................. 16 Theoretical Framework ............................................................................................................. 18 CHAPTER 3. PROJECT DESIGN ............................................................................................... 21 Project Implementation ............................................................................................................. 21 Institutional Review Board Approval ........................................................................................ 23 Data Collection .......................................................................................................................... 24 CHAPTER 4. EVALUATION METHODS USING THE PLAN-DO-STUDY-ACT CYCLE ... 25 Instruments ................................................................................................................................ 25 Plan ............................................................................................................................................ 25 Do .............................................................................................................................................. 26 Study .......................................................................................................................................... 27 Act ............................................................................................................................................. 27 CHAPTER 5. RESULTS ............................................................................................................... 29 Presentation of Findings ............................................................................................................ 29 vi Objective One ............................................................................................................................ 29 Objective Two ........................................................................................................................... 29 Objective Three ......................................................................................................................... 30 CHAPTER 6. DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS ..................................................... 31 Interpretation of Results ............................................................................................................ 31 Objective One ............................................................................................................................ 31 Objective Two ........................................................................................................................... 32 Objective Three ......................................................................................................................... 33 Limitations of Project ................................................................................................................ 34 Recommendations ..................................................................................................................... 35 Implications for Practice ............................................................................................................ 36 Implications for Future Research .............................................................................................. 37 Application to Other Nurse Practitioner Roles .......................................................................... 37 REFERENCES .............................................................................................................................. 39 APPENDIX A. NDSU IRB LETTER OF APPROVAL ............................................................... 47 APPENDIX B. PROJECT LETTER CONSENT ......................................................................... 48 APPENDIX C. MOCK RESUSUCITATION/SIMULATION SCENARIOS ............................. 49 APPENDIX D. PROVIDER RESOURCES ................................................................................. 53 APPENDIX E. DEBRIEFING TOOL .........................................................................................