Internally Displaced and Conflict Affected Populations Digest for September 2017

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Internally Displaced and Conflict Affected Populations Digest for September 2017 INTERNALLY DISPLACED AND CONFLICT AFFECTED POPULATIONS DIGEST FOR SEPTEMBER 2017 beneficiaries received HIGHLIGHTS primary legal aid 2126 ● Resolution #689, adopted in September, ● Misinterpretation of Order #1085, as well court cases are being provides for a number of changes. It ensures as its limitations, continues to prevent some processed IDPs’ rights to withdraw cash from Oschadbank people affected by conflict from obtaining IDP 471 cards at any ATM as well as for IDPs with registration, as well as from receiving targeted specific needs to receive pensions at home IDP payments or pensions. via Ukrposhta. At the same time, it requires all The number of requests for legal aid on social COURT CASES BY TYPE OF ISSUE IDPs who receive social payments or benefits ● payments and payments continues to grow, to pass physical verification at Oschadbank, with 92% of beneficiaries requesting primary not just pensioners like before. The makes Social benefits/pensions legal assistance on the issue in September IDPs’ lives more complicated due to limited 60% compared to 82% in July. capacities of Oschadbanks in regions which are densely populated with IDPs. The procedures ● R2P released a checkpoint (EECP) monitoring Personal for the above changes were not yet developed. report for June-July. 17% documentation Family IDP REGISTRATION AND 6% unity PERSONAL DOCUMENTATION The total number of officially registered IDPs Limited access to the SMS continues due HLP – except military has gradually increased since July (1,592,982 to high numbers of visitors and insufficient 5% occupation as of 25 September compared to 1,586,135 human/technical capacity of Donetsk and as of 28 August and 1,580,646 as of 24 July). Luhansk oblast offices as well as in Kharkiv At the oblast level, tangible changes in the and Barvinkivskyi Raion, Kharkiv Oblast. IDPs IDP registration number of officially registered IDPs have can wait up to 6 days to submit documents. It 3% been observed only in Donetsk, Luhansk and takes up to three months to issue international Dnipropetrovsk Oblasts (increases of 4877 and passports. 1009 persons and a decrease of 1998 persons IDPs continue to seek assistance from R2P respectively). Such fluctuations are mostly Job opportunities on issues related to documenting births and 3% due to the continuing verification process, deaths of persons living in the NGCA. removing double entries, re-registration of IDPs whose certificates were cancelled, and Other migration of IDPs between locations due to 3% employment, housing, transportation and service access. The IDP registration issue remains urgent. 19% of beneficiaries request 2% Freedom of movement primary legal assistance with IDP registration. The number of requests for primary and secondary legal aid on document-related issues remains almost the same as in August: monitoring with 9% of beneficiaries requesting and 32% visits respectively. Additional identification of IDPs 456 and other individuals, who obtained their persons received passports in the territory that is now in the information on NGCA remains complicated as the process 1824 protection issues requires additional documents or witnesses. The procedure may take up to two months and there persons with specific are instances of complete or partial absence needs received individual of supplementary documentation confirming 53 protection assistance the person’s identity. As a result people are limited in their access to different services and freedom of movement as State Migration This publication has been produced with Service offices (SMS) withdraw passports for the assistance of the UN Refugee Agency this period in most localities (except Donetsk (UNHCR) in the frame of the project Oblast where passports are not withdrawn for Advocacy, Protection and Legal Assistance the identification period, but only for a short to the Internally Displaced People period to update the passport photo). ID card for young IDP in Kharkiv SOCIAL BENEFITS AND/OR PENSIONS Payment of social benefits and pensions ● In addition, a number of DoSPs in Kharkiv, Donetsk Oblast, charging for “non-activity” remain the main concerns among IDPs. The Dnipropetrovsk, Zaporizhzhia and Donetsk in Nikolskyi Raion of Donetsk Oblast, fees for number of requests for legal aid on these Oblasts refuse to allocate targeted assistance physical identification in Sloviansk and Lyman issues continues to grow. 92% of beneficiaries to IDPs due to incorrect use of localities listed of Donetsk Oblast). requested primary legal on these issues in Order #1085: while some localities are Access to pensions is hindered in certain while 80% requested secondary legal aid on not mentioned in the list directly, they are ● localities of Donetsk and Luhansk Oblasts due these topics. The key causes are related to a administratively subordinated to the localities to limited capacities of local branches of the burdensome verification mechanism aimed or raions included into the list. State Pension Fund and Oschadbank. to reduce payments from the budget, and the There are still cases of deviation from the linkage of such payments to IDP registration. ● Staff of most Oschadbank branches claim procedure of verifying IDPs’ place of actual ● The other reasons are frequent changes in they have not received instructions related residence: there is a recommendation to legislation, absence of unified instructions and to the newly adopted Resolution #689 which confirm residency bimonthly in Veselivskyi procedures, incompetence/disorganization allows IDP pensioners to withdraw cash at Raion of Zaporizhzhia Oblast, compiling among employees of state establishments and ATMs of any bank. housing reports without actual home visits in Oschadbank, as well as a lack of coordination: Bilovodsk of Luhansk Oblast and Nikolskyi Raion ● Aside from IDP registration and payments, of Donetsk Oblast, leaving no notifications the next major issue is the authorities referring requesting IDPs visit the DoSP in Nikolskyi to the list of localities in Order #1085 when Raion of Donetsk Oblast. Moreover, some determining whether to register an IDP or DoSPs conduct home visits with considerable ACCESS TO provide benefits. As such, a number of IDPs delays (up to two months in Novoaidarskyi face new challenges obtaining targeted Raion of Luhansk Oblast) due to lack of fuel for ADEQUATE assistance, and in some cases, difficulty transportation. HOUSING obtaining IDP registration. Thus, Departments Violations continue to occur during physical of Social Protection (DoSPs) do not allocate ● ● IDPs continue to face the same problems identification of IDP pensioners or during targeted assistance to IDPs from localities concerning accommodation and shelter: cash withdrawal at Oschadbank offices: some that are in fact located in the NGCA or along high utility costs and debts in certain locations impose additional requirements the LoC but are not included in Order #1085 collective centres (due to absence of (copies of documents in Kurakhove, Bakhmut (Starolaspa of Boikivskyi Raion, Nevelske, individual utility meters in the sanatorium of and Sloviansk of Donetsk Oblast) or billable Pervomaiske and Netailove of Yasynuvatskyi Dniprodzerzhynsk Metallurgical Commercial transactions from 10 to 50 UAH (insurance in Raion, Zaitseve of Bakhmutskyi Raion, Complex in Dnipropetrovsk Oblast); Bakhmut, Kramatorsk, Druzhkivka, Mariupol Novohnativka of Volnovaskyi Raion, Solodke, inadequate living conditions in some and Nikolskyi Raion of Donetsk Oblast, Zhelanne and Karlivka of Marinskyi Raion of collective centres (Three collective centres in Dniprovskyi and Shevchenkivskyi districts of Donetsk Oblast, Zolote-5 and Novozvanivka Pavlohrad of Dnipropetrovsk Oblast whose Zaporizhzhia, Iziumskyi Raion of Kharkiv Oblast, of Popasnianskyi Raion of Luhansk Oblast). budgets lack repair funds. Two collective changing PIN codes in Pokrovsk, Bakhmut, Moreover, some DoSPs in Donetsk Oblast even centres are at risk of closing). Moreover, IDPs Kramatorsk, Druzhkivka and Myrnohrad of refuse to register such IDPs. complain about rising rent fees in Kharkiv and in the modular town of Pavlohrad of Dnipropetrovsk Oblast. As for the expiring and deteriorating modules in the modular FREEDOM OF MOVEMENT town in Kharkiv, they are partially replaced On 1 September, EECPs switched to autumn The percent of requests for primary legal aid with extra modules and those delivered schedules - working from 7 a.m. till 6.30 p.m., on freedom of movement related issues is from Dnipro; some refurbishment is also which reduces EECP capacity to some extent. constantly decreasing though. However 1/5 carried out. Meanwhile, the number of persons crossing of all beneficiaries requested assistance on ● Collective centre owners continue to evict EECPs remains high, with Marinka and Stanytsia the issue and it remains the second most IDPs who have utility debts. Luhanska being the busiest and Hnutove being frequently inquired about topic. the least busy. Long queues in both directions (up to 1,500 persons) were observed at Stanytsia Luhanska EECP mainly because of slow checks and a temporary decrease in the number of windows (3-6 instead of 8 until mid- September). Also, on 8 September, drivers and persons who crossed Marinka EECP from the NGCA to the GCA informed R2P monitors about very long queues (3 rows of vehicles – up to 500 cars and 700 people). According to them, up to 100 vehicles remained there overnight to cross the EECP. There is information that the lengthy queues were caused by
Recommended publications
  • Mental Health in Donetsk and Luhansk Oblasts - 2018
    Mental health in Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts - 2018 1 Content List of abbreviations....................................................................................................................................... 3 1. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................... 4 2. METHODOLOGY OF THE RESEARCH ....................................................................................................... 6 3. RESUME .................................................................................................................................................. 8 4. RECOMMENDATIONS BASED ON THE FINDINGS OF THE RESEARCH .................................................. 13 5. PREVALENCE OF MENTAL HEALTH PROBLEMS AMONG THE PEOPLE LIVING IN DONETSK AND LUHANSK OBLASTS ...................................................................................................................................... 16 А. Detecting the traumatic experience .................................................................................................... 16 B. Prevalence of symptoms of PTSD, depression, anxiety disorder, excess alcohol consumption. ........ 18 C. Prevalence of mental health problems among the inner circle of the respondents .......................... 27 D. Indicators of mental well-being .......................................................................................................... 27 6. ACCESS TO ASSISTANCE WHEN SUFFERING FROM
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Progress Report
    EU Support to the East of Ukraine – Recovery, Peacebuilding and Governance Annual Progress Report August 2018 – September 2019 EU Support to the East of Ukraine – Recovery, Peacebuilding and Governance Annual Progress Report August 2018 – September 2019 Table of contents List of annexes 5 Abbreviations and acronyms 6 Executive summary 7 Background 12 COMPONENT 1 16 LOCAL GOVERNANCE AND DECENTRALISATION REFORM Result 1.1 Nationwide decentralisation reform is fully implemented in the newly established Amalgamated Territorial Communities (ATCs) in areas of Donetsk and Luhansk oblast under the 18 control of the Government Result 1.2 Access to quality administrative and social services is improved 26 Result 1.3 Government capacity for participatory strategic planning and transparent project 30 implementation is enhanced. COMPONENT 2 36 ECONOMIC RECOVERY AND MSMES DEVELOPMENT REFORM Result 2.1 Network of service providers is established, and market access improved 38 Result 2.2 Access to credit and financing is improved and more flexible in Complement to KFW 43 Result 2.3 Provision of technical and vocational training is of increasing quality.. 46 COMPONENT 3 52 COMMUNITY SECURITY AND SOCIAL COHESION Result 3.1. A network of citizen groups is established to promote social cohesion and sustainable 54 socio-economic development. Result 3.2 Citizen group initiatives are financially supported. 77 COMPONENT 4 79 SECTORAL REFORMS AND STRUCTURAL ADJUSTMENTS (HEALTH) Result 4.1 The regional health care system is effectively functioning at the regional
    [Show full text]
  • Iom Ukraine Covid-19 Response. Report #5
    IOM UKRAINE COVID-19 RESPONSE Report 5, 30 July 2020 VETERAN TURNS QUARANTINE INTO OPPORTUNITY TO DEVELOP HIS BUSINESS The quarantine made us change “ almost everything in our business, first and foremost the general approach,” says IOM grantee, Artur Kinosian, who is a veteran from Pavlohrad, Dnipro Region. Together with his wife Olena, he used to produce packaging for corporate gifts, but due to COVID-19, the demand fell sharply. “We had to start taking on any orders that we could fulfil. Stencils, educational games, alphabets, rulers, decorative panels, promotional products, slate boards, and this is not even the full list of our products,” explains the veteran. Fortunately, orders continued to arrive, as Artur had already earned a reputation as a Photo: IOM / Volodymyr Shuvayev good craftsman and an honest businessman. Olena recently completed studying the basics of business. She wanted to make way. You can rejoice over the weekend… we understand each other and trust chocolates, but so far decided to do her But in five or ten years, you realize that life each other. When you have that kind of best to support her husband and promote just passes you by. Maybe someone is happy communication, you move forward faster their craft business. to live like that, as on an assembly line, but and further,” says Artur. I need to constantly create something, to In Artur’s and Olena’s small workshop, move somewhere. My business is for my Soon, Artur and Olena will be moving several protective shields remain from soul and for my self-esteem. When you forward faster with a new laptop that IOM a large order, which Artur and another make something and people buy it, that’s purchased for them.
    [Show full text]
  • Donbas, Ukraine: Organizations and Activities
    Geneva Centre for Security Sector Governance Civil Society in Donbas, Ukraine: Organizations and Activities Volodymyr Lukichov Tymofiy Nikitiuk Liudmyla Kravchenko Luhansk oblast DONBAS DONBAS Stanytsia Donetsk Luhanska Zolote oblast Mayorske Luhansk Donetsk Maryinka Novotroitske RUSSIA Hnutove Mariupol Sea of Azov About DCAF DCAF - Geneva Centre for Security Sector Governance is dedicated to improving the se- curity of people and the States they live in within a framework of democratic governance, the rule of law, and respect for human rights. DCAF contributes to making peace and de- velopment more sustainable by assisting partner states and international actors supporting them to improve the governance of their security sector through inclusive and participatory reforms. It creates innovative knowledge products, promotes norms and good practices, provides legal and policy advice and supports capacity building of both state- and non-state security sector stakeholders. Active in over 70 countries, DCAF is internationally recognized as one of the world’s leading centres of excellence for security sector governance (SSG) and security sector reform (SSR). DCAF is guided by the principles of neutrality, impartiality, local ownership, inclusive participation, and gender equality. www.dcaf.ch. Publisher DCAF - Geneva Centre for Security Sector Governance P.O.Box 1360 CH-1211 Geneva 1 Switzerland [email protected] +41 (0) 22 730 9400 Authors: Volodymyr Lukichov, Tymofiy Nikitiuk, Liudmyla Kravchenko Copy-editor: dr Grazvydas Jasutis, Richard Steyne
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Introduction
    State Service of Geodesy, Cartography and Cadastre State Scientific Production Enterprise “Kartographia” TOPONYMIC GUIDELINES For map and other editors For international use Ukraine Kyiv “Kartographia” 2011 TOPONYMIC GUIDELINES FOR MAP AND OTHER EDITORS, FOR INTERNATIONAL USE UKRAINE State Service of Geodesy, Cartography and Cadastre State Scientific Production Enterprise “Kartographia” ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Prepared by Nina Syvak, Valerii Ponomarenko, Olha Khodzinska, Iryna Lakeichuk Scientific Consultant Iryna Rudenko Reviewed by Nataliia Kizilowa Translated by Olha Khodzinska Editor Lesia Veklych ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ © Kartographia, 2011 ISBN 978-966-475-839-7 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction ................................................................ 5 2 The Ukrainian Language............................................ 5 2.1 General Remarks.............................................. 5 2.2 The Ukrainian Alphabet and Romanization of the Ukrainian Alphabet ............................... 6 2.3 Pronunciation of Ukrainian Geographical Names............................................................... 9 2.4 Stress .............................................................. 11 3 Spelling Rules for the Ukrainian Geographical Names....................................................................... 11 4 Spelling of Generic Terms ....................................... 13 5 Place Names in Minority Languages
    [Show full text]
  • Winterization Recommendations 2019-2020 Key Figures
    Winterization Recommendations 2019-2020 Key figures In need In need coverage (total) (priority) (existing programmes) HHs in private Donetsk obl. 3,150 committed houses and + 37,126 HHs 5,500 apartments Luhansk obl. 2,350 gap GCA Indiv. in CCs committed and Social All Ukraine 7,700 Ind 7,700 Institutions 7,700 gap 5,531* gap 6,000 committed Donetsk obl. 33,500 HHs 14,603 HHs in private 8,603 gap houses and 2,500 committed apartments Luhansk obl. 20,700 HHs 9,000 NGCA 6,500 gap 11,347 committed Indiv. in non- Donetsk obl. 30,900 ind NA specialized CCs 19,553 gap and Social NA committed Luhansk obl. 19,100 ind NA Institutions NA gap 23,182* gap * Note: # of individuals in CCs and social institutions were divided by Cluster coefficient of 2.42 in order to get the final number in HHs Contents 1. Winterization context and objectives .............................................................................................. 2 2. Key recommendations ..................................................................................................................... 2 3. Winterization beneficiary prioritization ........................................................................................... 4 4. Heating ............................................................................................................................................. 6 (a) GCA ........................................................................................................................................... 6 (b) NGCA .......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • HEALTH CLUSTER UKRAINE BULLETIN # 11 January-March 2021
    HEALTH CLUSTER UKRAINE BULLETIN # 11 January-March 2021 Ukraine Emergency type: Protracted Emergency Reporting period: January-March, 2021 2021 HRP Overview Health Cluster 2021 1.3 million people the Health Cluster aims to assist Number of partners: 59 2018 in 2021 National IGO authorities 5% 142,402 people benefited from healthcare services Others/Obs 7% in the first thee months of 20211 ervers INGO 8% 31% 20 projects approved for 2021 HRP NNGO USD 28,7 million funds requested 12% Donor USD 522,655 funds received (1,8% of requested) 22% United Nations 15% CO Health Cluster – Summary Health Cluster completed data collection and analysis for the preceding year (2020), which included detailed mapping g of humanitarian assistance and achievements reported by health cluster partners. In summary, almost 2 million people benefitted from healthcare services in 2020, including 1.2 million people who received COVID-related assistance. Health Cluster completed data collection as part of the first round of COVID-19 reporting. In partnership with WASH Cluster, the cluster is conducting mapping of COVID-19 related activities and supplies with a six-weeks interval and has designed new template with updated list of health facilities. Health Cluster conducted a serious of Questions and Answers (Q&A) sessions on relevant topics related to healthcare, including health reform, COVID-19 vaccination, infection prevention and control (IPC), changes in humanitarian goods importation etc. Health Cluster in partnership with WHO developed Public Health Situation Analysis (PHSA) for Donetska & Luhanska Oblasts, GCA. PHSA is part of the Public Health Information Services (PHIS) tools of the Global Health Cluster and provides all health sector/cluster partners with a common and comprehensive understanding of the public health situation in a crisis in order to inform evidence-based collective humanitarian health response planning.
    [Show full text]
  • Eastern Ukraine
    UKRAINE - Eastern Ukraine Flow Diagram of Cross Contact Line Movement (NGCA to GCA) For Humanitarian Use Only (among permanent residents of NGCA) Production date: April 04, 2020 Other oblasts Donetsk oblast Luhansk oblast Note: Bilovodsk Data, designations and boundaries Sieverodonetsk contained on this map are not warranted to be error-free Stanytsia Luhanska and do not imply acceptance by the REACH partners, associates, and donors mentioned on this product. Sloviansk Stanytsia Luhanska Bakhmut Kramatorsk Kharkiv Luhansk Luhansk Data was collected at EECPs from Kyiv Zaitseve City January 9th till February 24, 2020 Kostiantynivka Luhansk Center Luhansk in time period from 8am till 3pm West by stratified random sampling with 95% confidence level and Kadiivka Kadiivka Sorokyne Dnipro oblast 5% margin of error. Mayorsk Brianka Debaltseve Area of origin/destination settlement Alchevsk citation frequency was weighted Lutuhyne using total number of EECP Yenakiieve crossings as reported by UNHCR Rovenky (as of January and February 2020). Pokrovsk Donetsk Antratsyt Myrnohrad North The diagram displays only Horlivka Khrustalnyi Selydove NGCA to GCA routes, as reported Luhansk by respondents permanently Dnipro South residing in NGCA. Makiivka Interviews were conducted on official EECPs. Marinka Kurakhove Donetsk Donetsk Khartsyzk Current flow diagram can be used City East Marinka Chystiakove only for qualitative analysis. Vuhledar Snizhne Amvrosiivka Donetsk Proportion of respondents Zaporizhzhia oblast Novotroitske reporting a settlement Funded by: Implemented with: Novotroitske as their area of origin/destination: Volnovakha 5% Docuchaievsk 10% 15% 20% Respondents interviewed at (EECP): Stanytsia Luhanska Donetsk Russian Federation Mayorsk South Marinka Data sources Cross contact line movement data: Novotroitske Right to Protection, UNHCR Hnutove Contact: Hnutove Direction of the depicted [email protected] cross-contact line movement Mariupol Novoazovsk GCA NGCA Contact line Sea of Azov.
    [Show full text]
  • Field Office Mariupol
    UKRAINE SITUATION Field Office Updates | January 2019 Field Office Mariupol June 2018. Mariupol FO together with Mariupol community holding “World Refugee Day’ commemoration event. 303,469 100,000 3 567,000 IDPs residing in persons residing in the Entry-Exit crossings towards Southern Donetsk conflict affected areas Checkpoints between both sides and Zaporizka along the line of Government and registered for the Oblasts contact NGCA operating in period of FO Mariupol AoR December 2018 . Introduction Mariupol is a port city located in the southern part of the government-controlled area (GCA) of Donetsk region, on the coast of the Sea of Azov. Because of its proximity to the line of contact, Mariupol and the surrounding area, including some areas of Zaporizka Oblast accommodate a significant number of internally displaced people (IDPs). The total number of registered IDPs in the southern parts of Donetsk and Zaporizka Oblasts reached 303,469 persons. The eastern suburbs of Mariupol have been subjected to shelling due to their close proximity to the line of contact resulting in some displacement within the city and beyond. Some 145 settlements along the ‘line of contact’ have been affected by the fighting in the GCA of South-Donetsk region. The UNHCR Field Office in Mariupol was established in August 2014 and currently consists of ten staff. The area of responsibility (AoR) of the office consists of seven districts in southern Donetsk and four districts in Zaporizka Oblasts, including the city of Berdyansk. www.unhcr.org 1 FIELD OFFICE NAME UPDATE > Ukraine Situation / JANUARY 2019 Needs From the beginning of the conflict, 165 multistoried buildings (4500 apartments) and around 6,000 private homes in the southern parts of Donetsk Oblast were reportedly damaged.
    [Show full text]
  • COVID-19: Situation with Treatment More and More Confirmed Cases of COVID-19 Are Recorded Daily
    COVID-19: Situation with treatment More and more confirmed cases of COVID-19 are recorded daily. Official data already show about 60% of the beds in the hospitals of the first wave occupied. Given that statistics do not display hospitalized with suspicion, the actual situation might be even direr. Considering this, R2P decided to conduct monitoring visits to the treatment facilities to see the situation from within. In September, our monitors visited seven in-patient medical facilities and two probationary units located in or serving the population of Popasnianskyi raion of Luhanska oblast, Bakhmutskyi, Volnovaskyi, Yasynuvatskyi raions and Toretska MCA of Donetska oblast. Data was collected through interviews with informants. Although our respondents were carefully chosen and usually held administrative positions in each institution, the information might be subjective. Where it was feasible, data was cross-checked with multiple sources. Hospitals: The hospitals' total maximum capacity was 451, although some of the beds were in reserve. The number of beds in each facility, along with other indicators, can be observed in the table below. Special isolation wards were in operation only in Rubizhne central city hospital (CCH), Myrnohrad infectious disease hospital (IDH), and Volnovakha raion central hospital (RCH). The isolation ward in Kostiantynivka IDH is under reconstruction until the end of the year. After that, it can be deployed again. Elsewhere patients were accommodated in regular wards (normally hosting 2 – 4 patients each) on separate floors, ensuring safe access to sanitary facilities. Wards equipment ranged from new to being in satisfactory condition. Some beds needed replacement in Kostiantynivka intensive treatment hospital (ITH) and Toretsk CCH.
    [Show full text]
  • Eastern Ukraine Checkpoint Monitoring Report
    EASTERN UKRAINE CHECKPOINT MONITORING REPORT January – March 2019 vpl.com.ua 1 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 2 METHODOLOGY 2 HIGHLIGHTS 3 1 DEMOGRAPHICS OF RESPONDENTS 4 2 RESIDENCE, DISPLACEMENT, AND RETURNS 5 FREQUENCY AND DURATION 3 6 OF CROSSING 4 REASONS FOR CROSSING 7 5 DESTINATION OF THE TRIP 8 CONCERNS WHILE CROSSING THE LINE OF 6 10 CONTACT This publication has been produced with the assistance of the UN Refugee Agency (UNHCR). The contents of this publication are the sole responsibility of «Right to Protection» and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of UNHCR. Advocacy, Protection, and Legal Assistance to IDPs 2 INTRODUCTION This report provides the results of the survey conducted by the Charitable Foundation «The Right to Protection» (R2P) with the support of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) at the five entry-exit checkpoints (EECPs) to the non-government-controlled area (NGCA) in the first quarter of 2019. The data were collected during regular visits to each of the five EECPs (120 visits in three months). More statistical data are available on the Eastern Ukraine Checkpoint Monitoring Online Dashboard – https://goo.gl/Ab1qXs. Stanytsia Luhanska EECP METHODOLOGY The survey has been administered on It should be noted that the survey results a person refused to participate, monitors a regular basis since June 2017. The should not be directly extrapolated onto proceeded to survey the next fourth survey is part of the monitoring of the entire population traveling through person in line. People traveling both to violations of rights of the conflict-affected the checkpoints, but it helps identify and from the GCA took part in the survey.
    [Show full text]
  • Mobile Service Delivery for Conflict-Affected Populations in Eastern Ukraine
    Annual Project Results Report Mobile Service Delivery for Conflict-Affected Populations in Eastern Ukraine Project Number: Reporting Period: P006554 27 March 2019 – 31 March 2020 Country / Region: Date of Report: Ukraine / Europe 31 March 2020 Name of Implementer: United Nations Recovery and Peacebuilding Programme (UN RPP) Implementer’s name and contact Information: United Nations Recovery and Peacebuilding Programme (UN RPP) Victor Munteanu Programme Manager United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) 1 Aeroklubna Street, Kramatorsk, 84300, Ukraine E-mail: [email protected] Total Project Budget: CDN $5,000,000 Project start and end date: 27 March, 2019 – 30 June, 2022 1 3 Outcomes Achieved1 4 Progress towards the Ultimate Outcome 1000 Improved stability, enjoyment of human rights, and gender equality, of conflict- affected population, especially women and vulnerable or marginalized groups, of Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts Prior to the establishment of a network of mobile administrative service centres (ASCs) in the conflict-affected areas of Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts, the programme carried out a comprehensive assessment and analysis to identify 10 target communities - five from Donetsk and five from Luhansk oblasts. The communities were carefully selected in line with the project’s objectives and applications received from local authorities. Preference was given to the communities in close proximity to the “contact line” and to exit and entry checkpoints (EECPs), as well as large districts with a significant proportion of rural residents. Last but not least, the interest of communities in working and closely cooperating with the programme was assessed so as to ensure the sustainability of subsequent results. As a result, the following communities were selected to participate in the “Mobile Service Delivery for Conflict-Affected Populations in Eastern Ukraine” Project: Kurakhove, Mariinka, Mariupol, Siversk and Vuhledar in Donetsk Oblast, and Novoaidar, Popasna, Shchastia, Sievierodonetsk and Stanytsia Luhanska in Luhansk Oblast (see Figure 1).
    [Show full text]