Henderson Island Michael Brooke

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Henderson Island Michael Brooke Important Bird Areas Henderson Island Michael Brooke Abstract Subtropical Henderson Island is one of the Pitcairn Islands in the central South Pacific. Although over 600 years of Polynesian occupation have left an ecological mark, not least the continuing presence of Polynesian Rats Rattus exulans, the 37-km2 island is the Pacific’s best example of an ecologically intact raised coral island. For this reason it was designated a World Heritage Site in 1988. Four landbirds occur, all endemic to the island, of which the most distinctive is the flightless Henderson Crake Porzana atra. The others are a lorikeet, a fruit dove and a warbler. Seabirds abound. These comprise a mix of widespread tropical species such as boobies and noddies, and species with more restricted Pacific distributions, notably Pterodroma petrels. For one of these, the Henderson Petrel P. atrata, Henderson is the only known nesting station. However, fieldwork has established that the rats are devastating predators of petrel chicks. To benefit petrels and to achieve wider ecosystem restoration, rat eradication is now being actively planned. If successful, it would be easily the largest rat eradication achieved on British territory. enderson Island is a name that is Remote does not imply unwelcoming. perversely uninformative. It neither Mean monthly temperatures vary from Hgenerates an instant association with around 23°C (February) to 16°C (June), one of the giants of exploration, like the Ross while annual rainfall, about 1,600mm, is Sea, nor smacks of fire and brimstone, like plentiful but not excessive (Spencer 1995). Tierra del Fuego, nor smells of frangipani Trade winds from an easterly or southeasterly wafting across the South Seas, like Tahiti. But direction predominate. Benign indeed, espe- prosaically named Henderson, one of the cially in the absence of mosquitoes and other UK’s two World Heritage Sites designated for invertebrate irritants. its natural history, as opposed to cultural, From afar, Henderson appears as a low interest, is in fact a South Pacific conserva- slab barely showing above the horizon. But tion jewel. increasing numbers of gadfly petrels hint to Lying just south of the Tropic of Capri- the approaching seafarer that land is not far corn at 24°20’S 128°20’W, Henderson is one off. Most of that land is a pan-flat plateau, of the Pitcairn Islands. The other islands of about 30 m above sea level. Two-thirds of the this UK Overseas Territory are Pitcairn itself, perimeter is surrounded by vertical cliffs the only inhabited island and famously the dropping into blue waters that are supremely hideaway of the Bounty mutineers, and the clear because ocean productivity in the low atolls of Oeno and Ducie (all three of region is low. The remaining third of the them also Important Bird Areas). To a first island is girt with coral reefs, a narrow lagoon approximation, the islands are halfway and white beaches. On one of those beaches, between New Zealand’s North Island and the East Beach, Green Turtles Chelonia mydas Ecuador. Some 4,500 km from the nearest nest. Behind the beaches are pockets of continental land, 37-km2 Henderson is one of woodland which give way to fern-clad slopes the world’s remotest islands (fig. 1). rising towards the plateau woodland. 428 © British Birds 103 • August 2010 • 428–444 Henderson Island The plateau woodland rises to about 6 m and is thick, so thick in fact that it is difficult and sometimes impossible to walk except where a path has been cut by machete. Also impeding progress are the rough condi- tions underfoot: brittle slabs of dead coral, giant clam shells, limestone dissected by 2-m ‘crevasses’. These provide the clue to Henderson’s origin and ultimately its biological interest. The volcanic base of Henderson, emerging from the abyssal plain 2 km below, is about 13 million years old (Spencer 1995). When this emerged from the sea, an island surrounded by reefs was presumably formed and, Art © Fluke in time, this developed into a Fig. 1. Henderson Island and the Pitcairn group. low atoll. Then, around one million years ago, 170 km to the southwest, History Pitcairn erupted. As a result, the earth’s crust In 1988, Henderson’s natural history was not under Pitcairn was depressed while, by a well known, since visits had been few and far process of lithospheric flexure, the crust between. European discovery is attributed to under Henderson started to rise. So too did the Portuguese sailor Pedro Fernandez de the overlying Henderson Island, and it con- Quiros, who passed without landing in 1606 tinues to rise at about 1 mm per decade. The (but named it San João Baptista). The island result is that the coral of the plateau has now received its current name when visited in been high and dry and very dead for about 1819 by the British East India Company ship 380,000 years (Blake 1995). Hercules under the command of Captain Most of the Pacific’s raised coral or Henderson. The following year witnessed one makatea islands of any size have been sub- of the most remarkable episodes in Hen- stantially damaged by human settlement. Not derson’s recorded history. Three small whale- so Henderson, which currently has no boats arrived carrying the surviving crew of permanent human inhabitants. What makes the whaler Essex, wrecked 2,700 km to the this particularly significant is that the island’s north by an irate Sperm Whale Physeter gradual continuing uplift has enhanced catodon, the inspiration for Herman Henderson’s biological interest. No longer do Melville’s Moby Dick. After a hungry, week- tropical storms wash over the island, setting long sojourn on Henderson, the 17 seamen the evolutionary clock back to zero. Instead, set forth in their boats for Chile. The voyage terrestrial plants and animals reaching the saw intense hardship, the disappearance of island have the opportunity to evolve and one boat, and cannibalism. Only five men ultimately speciate into endemic taxa. It was survived. Meanwhile, the three sailors who this combination of high endemism and an elected to remain on Henderson were rescued intact, distinctive ecosystem relatively unbur- after a stay of four months (Philbrick 2000). dened with introduced species that led to Not surprisingly, this episode added little to Henderson’s designation as a World Heritage the stock of scientific knowledge. This stock Site in 1988. was, however, increased a century or so later British Birds 103 • August 2010 • 428–444 429 Brooke Michael Brooke 242. While apparently pristine and used by nesting Green Turtles Chelonia mydas, Henderson’s East Beach is depressingly cluttered with such jetsam as fishing buoys and plastic bottles. Michael Brooke 243. Climb a tree in the centre of Henderson and the view across the canopy cloaking the flat plateau is the same in every direction. A compass is essential! All photographs in this article were taken during a visit to Henderson in August/September 2009. 430 British Birds 103 • August 2010 • 428–444 Henderson Island by a phosphate-prospecting party which evidence of this occupation, which is obvious spent about five months on Henderson in even to a non-specialist, for example human 1912 under D. R. Tait, without finding com- bones and crafted clam shells. A large mercially useful deposits. midden crammed with fish and bird bones Specifically scientific visits followed from extends over some 300 m by 30 m under the the Whitney South Seas Expedition (1922), woodland behind the North Beach, in the the Mangarevan Expedition (1934) and the very spot opposite the reef passage used as a Westward Expedition (1971). In the early campsite by modern expeditions. The ebb 1980s, an American strip-mining millionaire, and flow of the Polynesian occupation was A. M. ‘Smiley’ Ratliff, proposed building a unravelled by Marshall Weisler of the holiday home and airstrip. This proposal 1991/92 Expedition and brought to wider drew howls of anguish from the conservation notice by Jared Diamond (2005) in his book community, indirectly contributed to the Collapse. World Heritage designation, and prompted a In the early centuries of the occupation, realisation that Henderson was inadequately those few tens of people dwelling on Hen- documented. A small Smithsonian Exped - derson maintained contact with Pitcairn, 170 ition in 1987 might have been the precursor km to the southwest, and Mangareva in the to a larger venture. However, this did not Gambier group of southeast French Poly- eventuate and the Sir Peter Scott Commem - nesia, a further 450 km to the northwest. The orative Expedition to the Pitcairn Islands of evidence of contact with those two islands 1991/92 filled the gap. The expedition comes from archaeological items such as vol- involved 34 people from seven countries, canic glass tools and oyster-shell fish-hooks with expertise in most branches of natural respectively, derived from materials not avail- history. Their efforts, spread over 15 months, able on Henderson itself. While the bones of documented Henderson’s biota, geology and children suggest that the Henderson popula- archaeology. Since then, there have been tion was resident, it was very possibly supple- several shorter follow-up visits, but the sheer mented by visitors from Pitcairn at key times difficulty of reaching isolated Henderson and of year, for example during the turtle nesting the inaccessibility of most parts of the island season, which runs from January to March. still curtail scientific progress. However, around 1450, inter-island contact It was this isolation that shaped the period ceased. Instead of Pitcairn’s volcanic stone, of Polynesian occupation, which began the inhabitants turned to locally sourced around AD 900 (Weisler 1995). To this day, giant clam shells for their stone tools, Hen- nearly all of Henderson’s larger caves show derson’s limestone being wholly unsuitable.
Recommended publications
  • Print 04/02 April
    From the Rarities Committee’s files: Rare seabirds and a record of Herald Petrel Ian Lewington ABSTRACT Rare seabirds are often extremely hard to identify, and a significant part of the problem is that, when observed from land, circumstances are typically very difficult. In many cases, one or more of the following drawbacks applies: the weather conditions are poor, views are distant and brief, and photographic evidence is impossible. For these same reasons, records of rare seabirds are also difficult to assess, particularly so if they concern what would be a ‘first for Britain’ for the species in question.This was the case when a probable Herald Petrel Pterodroma arminjoniana was seen off Dungeness, Kent, in January 1998. In this paper, the circumstances and the assessment of that record are described, and, more generally, the level of supporting evidence which is necessary for acceptance of records of rare seabirds is discussed. 156 © British Birds 95 • April 2002 • 156-165 Rare seabirds and a record of Herald Petrel are seabirds present difficulties in many panic was beginning to set in. Had we missed ways. They are difficult to find, and most it? A few seconds later, the mystery seabird Robservers will spend hundreds of hours came into our field of view, trailing behind a ‘sifting through’ common species before Northern Gannet Morus bassanus and flying encountering a rarity. They are difficult to iden- steadily west, low over the water, about 400 m tify, not least because the circumstances in offshore. which they are seen usually mean that, com- At the time of the observation the light was pared with most other birding situations, views dull but clear, in fact excellent for observing are both distant and brief, and the observer is colour tones.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Planning and the IUCN Red List
    Vol. 6: 113–125, 2008 ENDANGERED SPECIES RESEARCH Printed December 2008 doi: 10.3354/esr00087 Endang Species Res Published online May 7, 2008 Contribution to the Theme Section ‘The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species: assessing its utility and value’ OPENPEN ACCESSCCESS REVIEW Conservation planning and the IUCN Red List M. Hoffmann1, 2,*, T. M. Brooks1, 3, 4, G. A. B. da Fonseca5, 6, C. Gascon 7, A. F. A. Hawkins7, R. E. James8, P. Langhammer9, R. A. Mittermeier7, J. D. Pilgrim10, A. S. L. Rodrigues11, J. M. C. Silva12 1Center for Applied Biodiversity Science, Conservation International, 2011 Crystal Drive Suite 500, Arlington, Virginia 22202, USA 2IUCN Species Programme, IUCN — International Union for the Conservation of Nature, Rue Mauverney, 1196 Gland, Switzerland 3World Agroforestry Center (ICRAF), University of the Philippines Los Baños, Laguna 4031, Philippines 4School of Geography and Environmental Studies, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania 7001, Australia 5Global Environment Facility, 1818 H Street NW, Washington, DC 20433, USA 6Departamento de Zoologia, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Avenida Antonio Carlos 6627, Belo Horizonte MG 31270-901, Brazil 7Conservation International, 2011 Crystal Drive Suite 500, Arlington, Virginia 22202, USA 8Conservation International Melanesia Centre for Biodiversity Conservation, PO Box 106, Waigani, NCD, Papua New Guinea 9School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, PO Box 874501, Tempe, Arizona 85287-4501, USA 10BirdLife International in Indochina, N6/2+3, Ngo 25, Lang Ha, Ba Dinh, Hanoi, Vietnam 11Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, UK 12Conservation International — Brazil, Av. Gov. José Malcher 652, 2o. Andar, Ed. CAPEMI, Bairro: Nazaré, 66035-100, Belém, Pará, Brazil ABSTRACT: Systematic conservation planning aims to identify comprehensive protected area net- works that together will minimize biodiversity loss.
    [Show full text]
  • TAG Operational Structure
    PARROT TAXON ADVISORY GROUP (TAG) Regional Collection Plan 5th Edition 2020-2025 Sustainability of Parrot Populations in AZA Facilities ...................................................................... 1 Mission/Objectives/Strategies......................................................................................................... 2 TAG Operational Structure .............................................................................................................. 3 Steering Committee .................................................................................................................... 3 TAG Advisors ............................................................................................................................... 4 SSP Coordinators ......................................................................................................................... 5 Hot Topics: TAG Recommendations ................................................................................................ 8 Parrots as Ambassador Animals .................................................................................................. 9 Interactive Aviaries Housing Psittaciformes .............................................................................. 10 Private Aviculture ...................................................................................................................... 13 Communication ........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Pterodromarefs V1-5.Pdf
    Index The general order of species follows the International Ornithological Congress’ World Bird List. A few differences occur with regard to the number and treatment of subspecies where some are treated as full species. Version Version 1.5 (5 May 2011). Cover With thanks to Kieran Fahy and Dick Coombes for the cover images. Species Page No. Atlantic Petrel [Pterodroma incerta] 5 Barau's Petrel [Pterodroma baraui] 17 Bermuda Petrel [Pterodroma cahow] 11 Black-capped Petrel [Pterodroma hasitata] 12 Black-winged Petrel [Pterodroma nigripennis] 18 Bonin Petrel [Pterodroma hypoleuca] 19 Chatham Islands Petrel [Pterodroma axillaris] 19 Collared Petrel [Pterodroma brevipes] 20 Cook's Petrel [Pterodroma cookii] 20 De Filippi's Petrel [Pterodroma defilippiana] 20 Desertas Petrel [Pterodroma deserta] 11 Fea's Petrel [Pterodroma feae] 8 Galapágos Petrel [Pterodroma phaeopygia] 17 Gould's Petrel [Pterodroma leucoptera] 19 Great-winged Petrel [Pterodroma macroptera] 3 Grey-faced Petrel [Pterodroma gouldi] 4 Hawaiian Petrel [Pterodroma sandwichensis] 17 Henderson Petrel [Pterodroma atrata] 16 Herald Petrel [Pterodroma heraldica] 14 Jamaica Petrel [Pterodroma caribbaea] 13 Juan Fernandez Petrel [Pterodroma externa] 13 Kermadec Petrel [Pterodroma neglecta] 14 Magenta Petrel [Pterodroma magentae] 6 Mottled Petrel [Pterodroma inexpectata] 18 Murphy's Petrel [Pterodroma ultima] 6 Phoenix Petrel [Pterodroma alba] 16 Providence Petrel [Pterodroma solandri] 5 Pycroft's Petrel [Pterodroma pycrofti] 21 Soft-plumaged Petrel [Pterodroma mollis] 7 Stejneger's Petrel [Pterodroma longirostris] 21 Trindade Petrel [Pterodroma arminjoniana] 15 Vanuatu Petrel [Pterodroma occulta] 13 White-headed Petrel [Pterodroma lessonii] 4 White-necked Petrel [Pterodroma cervicalis] 18 Zino's Petrel [Pterodroma madeira] 9 1 General Bailey, S.F. et al 1989. Dark Pterodroma petrels in the North Pacific: identification, status, and North American occurrence.
    [Show full text]
  • Potential for Rat Predation to Cause Decline of the Globally Threatened
    Vol. 11: 47–59, 2010 ENDANGERED SPECIES RESEARCH Published online March 10 doi: 10.3354/esr00249 Endang Species Res OPENPEN ACCESSCCESS Potential for rat predation to cause decline of the globally threatened Henderson petrel Pterodroma atrata: evidence from the field, stable isotopes and population modelling M. de L. Brooke1,*, T. C. O’Connell2, David Wingate3, Jeremy Madeiros3, Geoff M. Hilton4, 6, Norman Ratcliffe5 1Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, UK 2McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3ER, UK 3Department of Conservation Services, Ministry of the Environment, PO Box FL117, Flatts, Bermuda 4Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, The Lodge, Sandy, Bedfordshire SG19 2DL, UK 5British Antarctic Survey, High Cross, Cambridge CB3 0ET, UK 6Wildfowl and Wetlands Trust, Slimbridge, Gloucestershire GL2 7BT, UK ABSTRACT: Past studies have indicated that Pacific rats Rattus exulans are significant predators of the chicks of surface-breeding seabirds, namely gadfly petrels Pterodroma spp., on Henderson Island, central South Pacific. Further fieldwork in 2003 confirmed the heavy predation of chicks of Murphy’s petrel P. ultima by rats. By extension, heavy predation is also likely each year on the endan- gered Henderson petrel P. atrata, for which Henderson Island is the only confirmed breeding site. To assess how important petrels are in the overall diet of rats, we conducted stable isotope analyses of rats from the shore, where petrels are most concentrated, and from about 1 km inland, where fewer nest. The carbon isotope results suggested that inland rats obtain about 30% of their food from marine sources, while the figure for shore rats was about 40%.
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Ecology of Petrels
    M o le c u la r e c o lo g y o f p e tr e ls (P te r o d r o m a sp p .) fr o m th e In d ia n O c e a n a n d N E A tla n tic , a n d im p lic a tio n s fo r th e ir c o n se r v a tio n m a n a g e m e n t. R u th M a rg a re t B ro w n A th e sis p re se n te d fo r th e d e g re e o f D o c to r o f P h ilo so p h y . S c h o o l o f B io lo g ic a l a n d C h e m ic a l S c ie n c e s, Q u e e n M a ry , U n iv e rsity o f L o n d o n . a n d In stitu te o f Z o o lo g y , Z o o lo g ic a l S o c ie ty o f L o n d o n . A u g u st 2 0 0 8 Statement of Originality I certify that this thesis, and the research to which it refers, are the product of my own work, and that any ideas or quotations from the work of other people, published or otherwise, are fully acknowledged in accordance with the standard referencing practices of the discipline.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement October 27, 2005
    Draft Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement Towards an Ecosystem Approach for the Western Pacific Region: From Species-based Fishery Management Plans to Place-based Fishery Ecosystem Plans October 27, 2005 Draft Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement Towards an Ecosystem Approach for the Western Pacific Region: From Species-based Fishery Management Plans to Place-based Fishery Ecosystem Plans October 27, 2005 ______________________________________________________________________________ Responsible Agency: National Marine Fisheries Service Pacific Islands Region 1601 Kapiolani Blvd., Ste. 1101 Honolulu, HI 96814 (808) 944-2200 Responsible Official: William L. Robinson Regional Administrator For Further Information Contact: William L. Robinson Kitty M. Simonds NMFS- Pacific Islands Region Western Pacific Fishery Managemnt Council 1601 Kapiolani Blvd., Suite 1110 1164 Bishop St., Ste. 1400 Honolulu, HI. 96814-4700 Honolulu, HI 96813 (808) 944-2200 ph. (808) 973-2941 fax (808) 522-8220 ph. (808) 522-8226 fax Abstract: This document analyzes the impacts on the human environment resulting from step one of the implementation of an ecosystem approach to fisheries management in the Western Pacific Region (American Samoa, Guam, Hawaii, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, and the U.S. Pacific Remote Island Areas1). The alternatives analyzed in this document are linked to the following five issues: the establishment of fishery ecosystem plan boundaries; the determination of appropriate management unit species; modifications
    [Show full text]
  • Pitcairn Islands
    Pitcairn Islands M. de L. Brooke Mitsuaki Iwago/Minden Pictures/FLPA Mitsuaki Iwago/Minden Bristle-thighed Curlews General introduction The Pitcairn Islands lie in the central South Pacific, about one of the UK’s Overseas Territories. In practice this means 300 miles to the south-east of the Gambier Islands of French that local decisions are taken by the 10-strong Island Council. Polynesia. The group comprises four islands: Pitcairn itself, Decisions about what might be termed foreign affairs are Henderson, Oeno and Ducie. Only Pitcairn, a rugged but handled by the British Administration in consultation with the small volcanic island (2 square miles/5 square km), is Island Council. A commissioner based in Auckland, New inhabited. The World Heritage Site of Henderson (14 Zealand, is responsible for arranging much of the island’s square miles/37 square km) is a raised coral island to the supplies and for philatelic issues, an important source of north-east of Pitcairn, while Oeno and Ducie are tiny, low income. The Governor of the Pitcairn Islands is based in atolls to the north and east respectively. Further details are Wellington where his principal role is as British High supplied in the site accounts of the four islands. Commissioner to New Zealand. There is also an officer in the Overseas Territory Department of the Foreign and The group is chiefly renowned for its association with the Commonwealth Office in London with responsibility for Bounty mutineers who arrived on Pitcairn in January 1790. Pitcairn matters. Since that time, and apart from two interruptions during the 19th century, the island has been continuously occupied Broadly the population grew during the 19th century and by the mutineers and their descendants.
    [Show full text]
  • Behavioural Observations of the Blue Lorikeet (Vini Peruviana) on Rangiroa Atoll, Tuamotu Archipelago, French Polynesia
    54 Notornis, 2003, Vol. 50: 54-58 0029-4470 O The Ornithological Society of New Zealand, Inc. 2003 SHORT NOTE Behavioural observations of the blue lorikeet (Vini peruviana) on Rangiroa atoll, Tuamotu Archipelago, French Polynesia BERND-HENNING GERISCHER Franz-Kogler-Ring 65, D - 09599 Freiberg, Germany BRUNO A. WALTHER Zoological Museum, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 15, DK 2100 Kobenhavn 0, Denmark Corresponding author: [email protected] The blue lorikeet (Vini peruviana) is a small in the south-east. Observations were made during parrot found on only fewer than 20 South Pacific all daylight hours over 13 days. islands and atolls (Collar 1997; Juniper & Parr Groups of lorikeets spent the night in the midst 1998; BirdLife International 2000). Because of its of leaves of the coconut palms that make up c. 75% restricted range and continued decline as a result of the total vegetation. Lorikeets became active of rat and cat predation, it is considered to be during sunrise (0600 h), but their calls could vulnerable (BirdLife International 2000). Although already be heard before and during dawn. They some behavioural observations of this species have usually preened intensively before they flew off in been published (Wilson 1993; references in Collar small groups to forage on the flowers of coconut 1997; Juniper & Parr 1998; BirdLife International palms. Usually, several birds sat silently on a 2000), there is still a paucity of data on the flower, using their brush-like tongues to collect the behaviour of this parrot. Therefore, we report pollen, which appears to be their main food source behavioural observations of the blue lorikeet made on these islands.
    [Show full text]
  • Herald Petrel New to the West Indies
    EXTRALIMITAL RECORD Herald Petrel new to the West Indies Michael Gochfeld,Joanna Burger, Jorge Saliva, and Deborah Gochfeld (Pterodroma)are bestrepresented SinA southGROUP temperate THEGADFLY and subantarc-PETRELS tic waterswith a few speciesbreeding on tropicalislands in the Central Pacific, Atlantic, and Indian Oceans.In the West Indies,the only member of this genusis the Black-cappedPetrel (P hasitata), which breeds in the Greater Antilles and perhaps still in the Lesser Antilles. A dose relative,the endangeredBermuda (P..cahow) breeds in Bermuda. On July 12, 1986, while studyingthe breeding Laughing Gulls (Larus atri- cilia), Royal Terns,and SandwichTerns (Sterna maxima and S. sandvicensis)on Cayo Lobito, in the Culebra National Wildlife Refuge, about 40 kilometers eastof Fajardo,Puerto Rico, we flushed an all-dark petrel from a scrapeamong the nestingterns. As soon as the bird wheeled around we realized that it was a petrel, and not the familiar Sooty Shearwater(Puj•nus griseus),a species Figure 1. Dark-phasePterodroma landing among Laughing Gulls on Cayo Lobito. Culebra, which would itselfbe extremelyunusual PuertoRico. Note the ashygray undersurface of theprimary.feathers, ending in longnarrow at Culebra. Compared to a shearwater, "digital" extensionsthat are the pale areas of the inner websof theprimaries. The greater the petrelappeared to havea largerhead underwingcoverts are pale with a narrowdark tip that showsas thefaint wavybar at the base of theprimaries. The Iongishtail and shortishbill are apparent. and a longerand slightlywedge-shaped tail. It did not showthe conspicuouspale wing linings of the Sooty Shearwater (Fig. 1). The bird circled rapidly, first low over the water and then wheeling high overthe rocky islet,before return- ing to its scrapeamong the gulls and terns.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Spatial Ecology of Three Closely-Related Gadfly Petrels Raül Ramos1, Iván Ramírez2, Vitor H
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Global spatial ecology of three closely-related gadfly petrels Raül Ramos1, Iván Ramírez2, Vitor H. Paiva3, Teresa Militão1, Manuel Biscoito4,7, Dília Menezes5, Richard A. Phillips6, Francis Zino4,7 & Jacob González-Solís1 Received: 30 September 2015 The conservation status and taxonomy of the three gadfly petrels that breed in Macaronesia is still Accepted: 03 March 2016 discussed partly due to the scarce information on their spatial ecology. Using geolocator and capture- Published: 22 March 2016 mark-recapture data, we examined phenology, natal philopatry and breeding-site fidelity, year-round distribution, habitat usage and at-sea activity of the three closely-related gadfly petrels that breed in Macaronesia: Zino’s petrel Pterodroma madeira, Desertas petrel P. deserta and Cape Verde petrel P. feae. All P. feae remained around the breeding area during their non-breeding season, whereas P. madeira and P. deserta dispersed far from their colony, migrating either to the Cape Verde region, further south to equatorial waters in the central Atlantic, or to the Brazil Current. The three taxa displayed a clear allochrony in timing of breeding. Habitat modelling and at-sea activity patterns highlighted similar environmental preferences and foraging behaviours of the three taxa. Finally, no chick or adult was recaptured away from its natal site and survival estimates were relatively high at all study sites, indicating strong philopatry and breeding-site fidelity for the three taxa. The combination of high philopatry, marked breeding asynchrony and substantial spatio-temporal segregation of their year-round distribution suggest very limited gene flow among the three taxa.
    [Show full text]
  • Threats to Seabirds: a Global Assessment 2 3 4 Authors: Maria P
    1 Threats to seabirds: a global assessment 2 3 4 Authors: Maria P. Dias1*, Rob Martin1, Elizabeth J. Pearmain1, Ian J. Burfield1, Cleo Small2, Richard A. 5 Phillips3, Oliver Yates4, Ben Lascelles1, Pablo Garcia Borboroglu5, John P. Croxall1 6 7 8 Affiliations: 9 1 - BirdLife International. The David Attenborough Building, Pembroke Street Cambridge CB2 3QZ UK 10 2 - BirdLife International Marine Programme, RSPB, The Lodge, Sandy, SG19 2DL 11 3 – British Antarctic Survey. Natural Environment Research Council, High Cross, Madingley Road, 12 Cambridge CB3 0ET, UK 13 4 – Centre for the Environment, Fishery and Aquaculture Science, Pakefield Road, Lowestoft, NR33, UK 14 5 - Global Penguin Society, University of Washington and CONICET Argentina. Puerto Madryn U9120, 15 Chubut, Argentina 16 * Corresponding author: Maria Dias, [email protected]. BirdLife International. The David 17 Attenborough Building, Pembroke Street Cambridge CB2 3QZ UK. Phone: +44 (0)1223 747540 18 19 20 Acknowledgements 21 We are very grateful to Bartek Arendarczyk, Sophie Bennett, Ricky Hibble, Eleanor Miller and Amy 22 Palmer-Newton for assisting with the bibliographic review. We thank Rachael Alderman, Pep Arcos, 23 Jonathon Barrington, Igor Debski, Peter Hodum, Gustavo Jimenez, Jeff Mangel, Ken Morgan, Paul Sagar, 24 Peter Ryan, and other members of the ACAP PaCSWG, and the members of IUCN SSC Penguin Specialist 25 Group (Alejandro Simeone, Andre Chiaradia, Barbara Wienecke, Charles-André Bost, Lauren Waller, Phil 26 Trathan, Philip Seddon, Susie Ellis, Tom Schneider and Dee Boersma) for reviewing threats to selected 27 species. We thank also Andy Symes, Rocio Moreno, Stuart Butchart, Paul Donald, Rory Crawford, 28 Tammy Davies, Ana Carneiro and Tris Allinson for fruitful discussions and helpful comments on earlier 29 versions of the manuscript.
    [Show full text]