DOCSLIB.ORG

Communication of European Populist

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

COMMUNICATION OF EUROPEAN POPULIST LEADERS ON TWITTER: AGENDA SETTING AND THE “MORE IS LESS” EFFECT Comunicación de los líderes populistas europeos en Twitter: construcción de la agenda y efecto “más es menos” Laura Alonso-Muñoz and Andreu Casero-Ripollés Nota: Este artículo se puede leer en español en: http://www.elprofesionaldelainformacion.com/contenidos/2018/nov/03_esp.pdf * Laura Alonso-Muñoz has a PhD in Communication Science and develops her research as Postdoc- toral Research Staff fellow from the Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (Mineco, Ministry of Economy, Industry and Competitiveness) in the Departament de Ciències de la Comunicació (De- partment of Communication Sciences) at the Universitat Jaume I (UJI) of Castelló (Spain). She has a degree in Journalism and a Master’s in the New Trends and Processes of Innovation in Communi- cation from UJI. She also is graduated in Political Science and Administration from the Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF) of Barcelona. Her research is framed in the transformation of political com- munication and journalism in social media. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8894-1064 [email protected] Andreu Casero-Ripollés is a journalism professor and dean of the Facultat de Ciències Humanes i Socials (Faculty of Human and Social Sciences) of the Universitat Jaume I (UJI), Castelló (Spain). He was previously director of the Departament de Ciències de la Comunicació (Department of Commu- nication Sciences) and director of the Journalism Degree course. He has a degree and a PhD from the Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. He is a member of the Institut d’Estudis Catalans (Institute for Catalan Studies) and has been a visiting researcher at the universities of Columbia (United States) and Westminster (United Kingdom) among others. He works on the transformations of digital journa- lism and political communication, and has published in journals such asInformation, communication & society; International journal of press/politics; Journalism; American behavioural scientist; Interna- tional journal of communication; and Journalism practice, among others. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6986-4163 [email protected] Universitat Jaume I, Facultat de Ciències Humanes i Socials, Departament de Ciències de la Comunicació Av. Vicent Sos Baynat, s/n. 12071 Castelló de la Plana, Spain Abstract The populist phenomenon has acquired great relevance during the last decade. The emergence of new populist actors and the consolidation of the use of social media such asTwitter are transforming the field of political communication. The objec- tive of this paper is to know the agenda set by the leaders of the main European populist political parties Twitteron , as well as the strategy they use and the user interaction achieved. The sample consists of the 2,310 tweets published by the leaders of Podemos, the 5 Stelle Movement, France’s National Front and UKIP during three random time periods. The results show a low degree of thematic fragmentation, the launch of proposals instead of attracting voters, and the existence of a strong negative correlation between the number of published tweets and user interest. Keywords Political communication; Populism; Social media; Twitter; Agenda-setting; Leadership. Resumen El fenómeno populista ha adquirido una gran relevancia durante la última década. El surgimiento de nuevos actores popu- listas junto con la consolidación del uso de redes sociales como Twitter están transformando el campo de la comunicación política. El objetivo de este artículo es conocer la agenda planteada en Twitter por los líderes de los principales partidos Manuscript received on 10-05-2018 Approved on 03-10-2018 El profesional de la información, 2018, noviembre-diciembre, v. 27, n. 6. eISSN: 1699-2407 1193 Laura Alonso-Muñoz and Andreu Casero-Ripollés políticos populistas europeos, así como la estrategia que emplean y la respuesta obtenida por parte de los usuarios. La muestra está integrada por los 2.310 tweets publicados por los líderes de Podemos, el Movimento 5 Stelle, el Frente Nacional y el UKIP durante tres periodos temporales aleatorios. Los resultados plantean un bajo grado de fragmentación temática, el lanzamiento de propuestas frente a la captación de votantes y la existencia de una fuerte correlación negativa entre el número de tweets publicados y el interés de los usuarios. Palabras clave Comunicación política; Populismo; Medios sociales; Twitter; Agenda-setting; Liderazgo. Alonso-Muñoz, Laura; Casero-Ripollés, Andreu (2018). “Communication of European populist leaders onTwitter : Agen- da setting and the ‘more is less’ effect”. El profesional de la información, v. 27, n. 6, pp. 1193-1202. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2018.nov.03 1. Introduction conventional media that are often hostile to them (Groshek; Engelbert, 2013), allowing their messages to reach citizens Populist parties and leaders are gaining an increasingly pro- directly (Bennet; Manheim, 2006; Vaccari; Valeriani, 2015). minent role in Western democracies. In the words of Mud- Populist politicians capitalise the power and influence of so- de (2004, p. 1) we are witnesses of a “populist zeitgeist”, the cial media in the development of public opinion by dissemi- emergence of a new era in which populist political parties nating populist ideas, such as attack on the elites or defence have been introduced in numerous European parliaments. of the people (Engesser et al., 2017). Gerbaudo (2014) calls Freedom Party of Austria FPÖ Party for Freedom PVV The ( ), ( ) this phenomenon Populism 2.0. in the Netherlands or the Alternative for Germany (AfD) achieved the support of more than 20% of the electorate Twitter offers great advantages to populist political actors. in the last elections. Others, such as Law and Justice (PiS) in Its immediate, free-of-charge, easy to use, interactive capa- Poland or the Fidesz-Hungarian Civic Union in Hungary, even city and virality make Twitter an essential tool for the com- govern in their respective countries. Recently, in the Italian munication strategy of this type of actor, who often have March 2018 elections, Movimento 5 Stelle obtained 32.66% more limited budgets than conventional parties (Strand- of the votes, making it the most voted party. berg, 2008). Precisely, it is the last two characteristics that attract the most the attention of the populists. On the one This increase in support for left-wing and right-wing popu- hand, the fact that Twitter offers an unmediated communi- list political actors (Rooduijn, 2015) is due, amongst other cation allows them to maintain direct contact with the peo- factors, to the increased use of social media (Mudde, 2016). ple, the main recipients of their messages, and elude their Twitter Facebook Platforms such as or allow them to skip the enemies, the elites, who control the conventional media formalities from conventional media and share their mes- (Van-Kessel; Castelein, 2016). sages much more directly with their audience (Engesser; Fawzi; Larsson, 2017). This way, they can set an alternative On the other hand, the viralising capacity of Twitter allows agenda to that of conventional media (Enli; Skogerbø, 2013; its messages to reach a greater number of people quickly Galán-García, 2017) and launch functions ranging from in- and easily (Bartlett, 2014; Elmer, 2013) and even to be able formative self-mediation (Cammaerts, 2012) to interaction to access the media agenda more easily (Casero-Ripollés; with the public (Alonso-Muñoz; Marcos-García; Casero-Ri- Feenstra; Tormey, 2016). This aspect is very useful for po- pollés, 2016), aspects that redefine the role played by po- pulist political actors given the difficulty they have in disse- pulist political actors in political communication and their minating and introducing their own issues and approaches relations with the public and journalists (Jungherr, 2014). in society. In addition, the fact that social media encourage homophily (Colleoni; Rozza; Arvidsson, 2014) allows their Research on the evolution of populism on the Internet and messages to have a better and greater reception by their fo- social media at a comparative level is still scarce, and exis- llowers, who are more receptive to listening and retransmit- ting research focuses on the analysis of electoral periods ting them, generating an echo chamber dynamic (Jamieson; et al. (Van-Kessel; Castelein, 2016; Engesser , 2017; Ernst; Cappella, 2008; Jacobs; Spierings, 2016). Engesser; Esser, 2017). Thus, the objective of this article is to analyse how Twitter is used by the leaders of four Euro- Research such as that of Enli (2017) has demonstrated that pean populist European parties outside electoral periods to social media has a great impact on the definition of the pu- analyse their usual communications strategy. blic agenda, especially for those actors that are not part of the elite. The case of Podemos is paradigmatic in this sense. 1.1. Populism in the digital environment Through the activation of the two-way street mediatization, the party managed to incorporate its proposals into conven- Communication plays a fundamental role in the development tional media (Casero-Ripollés; Feenstra; Tormey, 2016). and growth of populism (Jagers; Walgrave, 2007; Block; Negrine, 2017). While the traditional media context makes Previous bibliography on the agenda posed by political it difficult to get into the news (Shoemaker; Vos, 2009), the actors on Twitter has focused on electoral campaigns and digital environment allows the circumvention of the filter of highlighted
Recommended publications
  • Department of English and American Studies UKIP And

    Department of English and American Studies UKIP And

    Masaryk University Faculty of Arts Department of English and American Studies English Language and Literature Anders Heger UKIP and British Politics Bachelor‟s Diploma Thesis Supervisor: Stephen Paul Hardy, Ph.D. 2015 I declare that I have worked on this thesis independently, using only the primary and secondary sources listed in the bibliography. ..................................................... Author‟s signature Acknowledgement I would like to express my thanks towards the Masaryk University and the Czech Republic for providing me with free education and I would also like to thank my supervisor, Mr. Hardy, for his support and much appreciated counsel. Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 5 The History of UKIP ..................................................................................................................... 8 Allan Sked and the First Years .................................................................................................. 8 Change of Leadership and Becoming the Fourth Largest Party ............................................. 12 Becoming a Political Party ...................................................................................................... 16 The Beginning of a New Era ................................................................................................... 21 Analysing the Party‟s Policies ...................................................................................................
  • Now UKIP's Leader Paul Nuttall Has Been Called

    Now UKIP's Leader Paul Nuttall Has Been Called

    1 PAUL NUTTAL ANDREW MARR SHOW 5TH MARCH 2017 PAUL NUTTALL Andrew Marr: Now UKIP’s Leader Paul Nuttall has been called the ‘purple Pinocchio’ and he’s been derided on social media as a fantasist. One of the party’s biggest donors Arron Banks says that his leadership is weak and that the party quotes ‘thrashing around for a purpose. Paul Nuttall joins me now’ Andrew Marr: It was a very, very bruising by-election for you and you then went on holiday. Paul Nuttall: Yes. Andrew Marr: Where did you go? Paul Nuttall: Where did I go? Andrew Marr: Yes. Paul Nuttall: I disappeared somewhere in this country. I wanted to get away. I was being hounded by the press, my family were being hounded by the press as well. Frankly, you know, it was a long, difficult campaign and you know, I’m back in the saddle now, that’s the main thing, and UKIP will move forward. Andrew Marr: After all the things that were said about you during that campaign did you ever think ‘I might step down as leader. Maybe I’m the wrong guy for this job’? Paul Nuttall: I never thought I was the wrong guy. I mean, of course you do have moments of doubt. Well, look, you know, it was a highly personal campaign. My family were being hounded in a way that I think most politicians will never have to go through. 2 PAUL NUTTAL You know, when your 86 year old grandmother, who’s standing there in her dressing gown, gets a camera shoved in her face, when your father’s being followed to work, you know, when your wider family are being harassed, you know, it is difficult.
  • European Parliament Elections 2014

    European Parliament Elections 2014

    European Parliament Elections 2014 Updated 12 March 2014 Overview of Candidates in the United Kingdom Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................... 2 2.0 CANDIDATE SELECTION PROCESS ............................................................................................. 2 3.0 EUROPEAN ELECTIONS: VOTING METHOD IN THE UK ................................................................ 3 4.0 PRELIMINARY OVERVIEW OF CANDIDATES BY UK CONSTITUENCY ............................................ 3 5.0 ANNEX: LIST OF SITTING UK MEMBERS OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT ................................ 16 6.0 ABOUT US ............................................................................................................................. 17 All images used in this briefing are © Barryob / Wikimedia Commons / CC-BY-SA-3.0 / GFDL © DeHavilland EU Ltd 2014. All rights reserved. 1 | 18 European Parliament Elections 2014 1.0 Introduction This briefing is part of DeHavilland EU’s Foresight Report series on the 2014 European elections and provides a preliminary overview of the candidates standing in the UK for election to the European Parliament in 2014. In the United Kingdom, the election for the country’s 73 Members of the European Parliament will be held on Thursday 22 May 2014. The elections come at a crucial junction for UK-EU relations, and are likely to have far-reaching consequences for the UK’s relationship with the rest of Europe: a surge in support for the UK Independence Party (UKIP) could lead to a Britain that is increasingly dis-engaged from the EU policy-making process. In parallel, the current UK Government is also conducting a review of the EU’s powers and Prime Minister David Cameron has repeatedly pushed for a ‘repatriation’ of powers from the European to the national level. These long-term political developments aside, the elections will also have more direct and tangible consequences.
  • Article the Empire Strikes Back: Brexit, the Irish Peace Process, and The

    Article the Empire Strikes Back: Brexit, the Irish Peace Process, and The

    ARTICLE THE EMPIRE STRIKES BACK: BREXIT, THE IRISH PEACE PROCESS, AND THE LIMITATIONS OF LAW Kieran McEvoy, Anna Bryson, & Amanda Kramer* I. INTRODUCTION ..........................................................610 II. BREXIT, EMPIRE NOSTALGIA, AND THE PEACE PROCESS .......................................................................615 III. ANGLO-IRISH RELATIONS AND THE EUROPEAN UNION ...........................................................................624 IV. THE EU AND THE NORTHERN IRELAND PEACE PROCESS .......................................................................633 V. BREXIT, POLITICAL RELATIONSHIPS AND IDENTITY POLITICS IN NORTHERN IRELAND ....637 VI. BREXIT AND THE “MAINSTREAMING” OF IRISH REUNIFICATION .........................................................643 VII. BREXIT, POLITICAL VIOLENCE AND THE GOVERNANCE OF SECURITY ..................................646 VIII. CONCLUSION: BREXIT AND THE LIMITATIONS OF LAW ...............................................................................657 * The Authors are respectively Professor of Law and Transitional Justice, Senior Lecturer and Lecturer in Law, Queens University Belfast. We would like to acknowledge the comments and advice of a number of colleagues including Colin Harvey, Brian Gormally, Daniel Holder, Rory O’Connell, Gordon Anthony, John Morison, and Chris McCrudden. We would like to thank Alina Utrata, Kevin Hearty, Ashleigh McFeeters, and Órlaith McEvoy for their research assistance. As is detailed below, we would also like to thank the Economic
  • Case Study on the United Kingdom and Brexit Juliane Itta & Nicole Katsioulis the Female Face of Right-Wing Populism and Ex

    Case Study on the United Kingdom and Brexit Juliane Itta & Nicole Katsioulis the Female Face of Right-Wing Populism and Ex

    Triumph of The women? The Female Face of Right-wing Populism and Extremism 02 Case study on the United Kingdom and Brexit Juliane Itta & Nicole Katsioulis 01 Triumph of the women? The study series All over the world, right-wing populist parties continue to grow stronger, as has been the case for a number of years – a development that is male-dominated in most countries, with right-wing populists principally elected by men. However, a new generation of women is also active in right-wing populist parties and movements – forming the female face of right-wing populism, so to speak. At the same time, these parties are rapidly closing the gap when it comes to support from female voters – a new phenomenon, for it was long believed that women tend to be rather immune to right-wing political propositions. Which gender and family policies underpin this and which societal trends play a part? Is it possible that women are coming out triumphant here? That is a question that we already raised, admittedly playing devil’s advocate, in the first volume of the publication, published in 2018 by the Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung Triumph of the women? The Female Face of the Far Right in Europe. We are now continuing this first volume with a series of detailed studies published at irregular intervals. This is partly in response to the enormous interest that this collection of research has aroused to date in the general public and in professional circles. As a foundation with roots in social democracy, from the outset one of our crucial concerns has been to monitor anti-democratic tendencies and developments, while also providing information about these, with a view to strengthening an open and democratic society thanks to these insights.
  • European Parliament Elections 2014 RESEARCH PAPER 14/32 11 June 2014

    European Parliament Elections 2014 RESEARCH PAPER 14/32 11 June 2014

    European Parliament Elections 2014 RESEARCH PAPER 14/32 11 June 2014 Elections to the European Parliament were held across the 28 states of the European Union between 22 and 25 May 2014. The UK elections were held concurrently with council elections in England and Northern Ireland on 22 May. The UK now has 73 MEPs, up from 72 at the last election, distributed between 12 regions. UKIP won 24 seats, Labour 20, the Conservatives 19, and the Green Party three. The Liberal Democrats won only one seat, down from 11 at the 2009 European election. The BNP lost both of the two seats they had won for the first time at the previous election. UKIP won the popular vote overall, and in six of the nine regions in England. Labour won the popular vote in Wales and the SNP won in Scotland. Across the UK as a whole turnout was 35%. Across Europe there was an increase in the number of seats held by Eurosceptic parties, although more centrist parties in established pro-European groups were still in the majority. The exact political balance of the new Parliament depends on the formation of the political groups. Turnout across the EU was 43%. It was relatively low in some of the newer Member States. Part 1 of this paper presents the full results of the UK elections, including regional analysis and local-level data. Part 2 presents a summary of the results across the EU, together with country-level summaries based on data from official national sources. Oliver Hawkins Vaughne Miller Recent Research Papers 14/22 Accident & Emergency Performance: England 2013/14.
  • Nigel Farage Richard Tice

    Nigel Farage Richard Tice

    NIGEL FARAGE RICHARD TICE A CLEAN-BREAK BREXIT IS THE KEY TO CHANGING BRITAIN FOR GOOD Our priority is to Leave the European Union and deliver the Brexit that 17.4m voted for in 2016. Acting on the biggest popular mandate in British history is crucial to restore faith in our democracy. What sort of democratic society do we live in, if a few Parliamentarians can defy the expressed will of the people? Leaving the undemocratic EU is just the beginning. It will be the first step in a political revolution. We want fundamental democratic reforms to fix our broken political system and make Parliament serve the People. A Clean-Break Brexit can also shape the future of our economy and society. It will give us the freedom to shape our future by taking immediate control of our own laws, borders, money, fishing and defence. We want to cancel HS2, save 50% of the foreign aid budget and save another £13bn a year in payments to the EU. That money can form part of a Brexit dividend to invest billions in Britain’s Regions, cut the cost of living, and build a better future for millions of our people. NIGEL FARAGE Leader of The Brexit Party The old mainstream parties have made ‘manifesto’ a dirty word. Everybody knows that a manifesto is little more than a set of vague promises that its authors have no intention of keeping. By contrast, our Contract with the People is a targeted set of deliverable pledges. We are not seeking election as a government.
  • Violent Protest and Heterogeneous Diffusion

    Violent Protest and Heterogeneous Diffusion

    BRITAIN FIRST AND THE UK INDEPENDENCE PARTY: SOCIAL MEDIA AND MOVEMENT-PARTY DYNAMICS1 Thomas Davidson and Mabel Berezin2 FORTHCOMING IN DECEMBER 2018 ISSUE OF MOBILIZATION. PLEASE CITE THE PUBLISHED VERSION. Social movement scholars have recently turned their attention to the interactions between political parties and social movements, but little is known about how social media have impacted these relationships, despite widespread adoption of these technologies. We present a case study of the relationship between Britain First, a far-right anti-Muslim social movement, and the U.K. Independence Party, the Eurosceptic political party that spearheaded the Brexit campaign. The movement appeared marginal in the press but it dominated social media, using this presence to support to the party. We examine the dynamics of the relationship between these groups from 2013 until 2017, drawing upon data from social media, newspapers, and other online sources, and focusing on interactions between elites and rank-and-file supporters. Our findings illustrate how far-right groups have used new technologies to generate an unprecedented amount of popular support and to attempt to influence the political mainstream. A number of western democracies have recently experienced a resurgence of right-wing political activity in both the parliamentary and extra-parliamentary sphere (Akkerman, de Lange, and Rooduijn 2016; Mudde 2016; Muis and Immerzeel 2017). In Germany, the unprecedented electoral performance of the anti-immigrant Alternative for Germany (AfD) party
  • Explaining the Rise of the UK Independence Party by Matthew Goodwin

    Explaining the Rise of the UK Independence Party by Matthew Goodwin

    Explaining the Rise of the UK Independence Party By Matthew Goodwin At the 2014 European Parliament elections the UK Independence Party (UKIP) become the first new party in British politics since the 1920s to top the poll in a nationwide election. It was also the first occasion since 1906 when a party other than Labour or the Conservatives won the highest share of the national vote. So where did UKIP come from, who is supporting it, and what does its rise reveal about British and also European politics? UKIP is the most significant new party in British politics for a generation. Particularly since 2010 the party has been attracting rapidly rising public support after broadening its Eurosceptic message to include strong opposition to immigration and populist attacks against Britain’s established political class. UKIP is currently winning more than one in ten voters at domestic Westminster voting intention polls, while at the recent European Parliament elections the party won over more than one in four. With 4.3 million votes at these elections UKIP established itself as a major political force. Moreover, these elections also saw Nigel Farage’s party attract extremely high levels of support in some areas that are mainly along the Eastern Coast of England. In nine local authorities, for example, UKIP polled over 45% of the vote, pointing to some likely strong results at the 2015 British general election. A long time coming: why UKIP is no ‘flash-in-the-pan’ According to conventional wisdom, UKIP is simply the latest reflection of enduring divisions among Conservatives over Britain’s membership of the European Union.
  • “Benefit Tourism” and Migration Policy in the UK

    “Benefit Tourism” and Migration Policy in the UK

    “Benefit Tourism” and Migration Policy in the U.K.: The Construction of Policy Narratives Meghan Luhman Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Political Science Johns Hopkins University [email protected] February 2015 Draft Prepared for EUSA Conference March 5­7, 2015, Boston, MA. Please do not cite or circulate without author’s permission. 1 I. Introduction In 2004, ten new member states, eight from Central and Eastern Europe (the so­called “A8” countries), joined the European Union. European Union citizens have the right to freely move throughout and reside in (subject to conditions) all member states. At the time, though thirteen out of fifteen existing E.U. member states put temporary restrictions on migrants from these new member states, the U.K. decided to give these migrants immediate full access to the labor market. While in France, for example, fears about the “Polish plumber” taking French jobs became a hot topic of debate and caused the French to implement temporary controls, in the U.K. Tony Blair highlighted “the opportunities of accession” to fill in gaps in the U.K. economy (T​he Guardian, 2​7 April 2004). Blair’s Conservative opponents had also largely supported enlargement in the 1990s, noting the expansion of the E.U. would increase trade and “encourage stability and prosperity” (HC Deb 21 May 2003 vol 405 cc1021). The U.K. was hailed by members of the European Parliament as welcoming, and in spite of some fears of strain on social services and benefits, studies showed that the migrants had been a net benefit for the U.K.
  • Administration of Donald J. Trump, 2019 Digest of Other White House

    Administration of Donald J. Trump, 2019 Digest of Other White House

    Administration of Donald J. Trump, 2019 Digest of Other White House Announcements December 31, 2019 The following list includes the President's public schedule and other items of general interest announced by the Office of the Press Secretary and not included elsewhere in this Compilation. January 1 In the afternoon, the President posted to his personal Twitter feed his congratulations to President Jair Messias Bolsonaro of Brazil on his Inauguration. In the evening, the President had a telephone conversation with Republican National Committee Chairwoman Ronna McDaniel. During the day, the President had a telephone conversation with President Abdelfattah Said Elsisi of Egypt to reaffirm Egypt-U.S. relations, including the shared goals of countering terrorism and increasing regional stability, and discuss the upcoming inauguration of the Cathedral of the Nativity and the al-Fatah al-Aleem Mosque in the New Administrative Capital and other efforts to advance religious freedom in Egypt. January 2 In the afternoon, in the Situation Room, the President and Vice President Michael R. Pence participated in a briefing on border security by Secretary of Homeland Security Kirstjen M. Nielsen for congressional leadership. January 3 In the afternoon, the President had separate telephone conversations with Anamika "Mika" Chand-Singh, wife of Newman, CA, police officer Cpl. Ronil Singh, who was killed during a traffic stop on December 26, 2018, Newman Police Chief Randy Richardson, and Stanislaus County, CA, Sheriff Adam Christianson to praise Officer Singh's service to his fellow citizens, offer his condolences, and commend law enforcement's rapid investigation, response, and apprehension of the suspect.
  • E-Review: February's By-Elections

    E-Review: February's By-Elections

    reviewMarch 2017 www.hoddereducation.co.uk/politicsreview February’s by-elections CORUND/FOTOLIA Emma Kilheeney considers the results of the two February by-elections n two important by-elections on 23 February Labour lost the constituency of Copeland to the UKIP fails to steal Stoke IConservatives for the first time in over 80 years but held on to Stoke, defeating UKIP candidate and party When Tristram Hunt MP decided to end his political leader Paul Nuttall. career, and resign from his Stoke-on-Trent seat to become the director of the Victoria and Albert Museum, Conservatives conquer Copeland Labour knew it would have a hard fight against UKIP. In Copeland the Conservatives celebrated becoming As 69% of the electorate in the Stoke constituency voted the first governing party since 1982 to gain a seat in to leave the EU last June, UKIP hoped to capitalise on a by-election. Conservative candidate Trudy Harrison the Brexit issue, and ran its party leader, Paul Nuttall, as defeated Labour, which had held the Copeland candidate. In fact UKIP failed to make significant gains seat since 1983 and its predecessor constituency on its performance here in the 2015 general election. Whitehaven since 1935. Jeremy Corbyn fought off The Labour candidate, and winner of the by- calls for his resignation after his party lost this seat in election, Gareth Snell was helped by the fact that Paul its heartland. Nuttall made a series of political gaffs including: Professor John Curtice, of Strathclyde University, • being unable to name the six towns that make up told the BBC that the Copeland result was the best by- Stoke election performance by a governing party — in terms • falsely claiming to have lost close personal friends in of the increase in its share of the vote — since January the Hillsborough disaster 1966.