DOCSLIB.ORG

Small Enterprise and Oligopoly; a Study of the Butter, Flour, Automobile, and Glass Container Industries

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Small Enterprise and Oligopoly; a Study of the Butter, Flour, Automobile, and Glass Container Industries Small Enterprise and Oligopoly A Study of the Butter, Flour, Automobile, and Glass Container Industries HAROLD G. VATTER OREGON STATE COLLEGE CORVALLIS, OREGON, PRINTED AT THE COLLEGE PRESS. 1955. OREGON STATE MONOGRAPHS STUDIES IN BOTANY No. 1. Tuberales of North America, By Helen M. Gilkey, Ph.D., Professor of Botany; Curator of Herbarium $0.50 No. 2. Developmental Morphology of Alpova, By S. M. Zeller, Ph.D., Plant Pathologist .35 No. 3. Paleoecology of Two Peat Deposits on the Oregon Coast, By Henry P. Hansen, Ph.D., Professor of Botany ....... ..... .50 No. 4. Moss Flora of the Willamette Valley, Oregon, By Clara J. Chapman, M.S., Graduate Assistant, and Ethel I. Sanborn, Ph.D., Professor of Botany .50 No. 5. Floral Anatomy of the Santalaceae and Some Related Forms, By Frank H. Smith, Ph.D., Associate Professor of Botany, and Elizabeth C. Smith, Ph.D. .50 No. 6. Septoria Disease of Gramineae in Western United States, By Roderick Sprague, Ph.D., Pathologist 1.50 No. 7. Clavaria, the Species Known from Oregon and the Pacific Northwest, By Maxwell S. Doty, Ph.D., Department of Botany, Northwestern University .75 No. 8. The Marine Algae of the Coos Bay-Cape Arago Region of Oregon, By Ethel I. Sanborn, Ph.D., Professor of Botany and Pa leo­ botany, and Maxwell S. Doty, Ph.D., Department of Botany, Northwestern University .75 No. 9. Northwestern American Plants, By Helen M. Gilkey, Ph.D., Professor of Botany, Curator of Herbarium .75 No. 10. Species of Selenophoma on North American Grasses, By Roderick Sprague, Ph.D., Pathologist, and A. G. Johnson, Ph.D., Pathologist, U. S. Department of Agriculture .75 STUDIES IN ECONOMICS No. 1. The Salmon Canning Industry, By D. B. DeLoach, Ph.D., Professor of Agricultural Economics .50 No. 2. An Analysis of the State Milk Laws Designed to Effect Economic Control of the Market Milk Industry, By E. L. Rada, B.S., Research Assistant in Agricultural Economics, and D. B. DeLoach, Ph.D., Professor of Agricultural Economics .50 No. 3. The Oregon Fiber-Flax Industry, with Particular Reference to Marketing, By E. L. Rada, M.S., Research Assistant, and D. B. DeLoach, Ph.D., Professor of Agricultural Economics .50 No. 4. Small Enterprise and Oliogopoly, By Harold G. Vatter, Ph.D., Associate Professor of Economics 1.00 STUDIES IN EDUCATION AND GUIDANCE No. 1. A Functional Curriculum in Professional Forestry, By Earl George Mason, Ed.D., Professor of Forestry .75 No. 2. Forest Management Education in Oregon By Walter Fraser McCulloch, Ed.D., Professor of Forest Management, with a Foreword by Kenneth P. Davis, Ph.D., Dean, School of Forestry, Montana State University 1.00 No. 3. Selected Procedures in Teaching High School Biology, By E. Irene Hollenbeck, M.S., Teacher of Biology, Salem, Oregon, and Elmo N. Stevenson, Ed.D., President of Southern Oregon College of Education .75 No. 4. An Adult Education Program for Orissa, India By William Cyril Osgood, Ed.D., Missionary, Hatigarh, Balasore, Orissa, India 1.00 STUDIES IN ENTOMOLOGY No. 1. A Review of the Genus Eucerceris (Hymenoptera : Sphecidae), By Herman A. Scullen, Ph.D., Professor of Entomology .50 (Continued on inside back cover) Small Enterprise and Oligopoly A Study of the Butter, Flour, Automobile, and Glass Container Industries By HAROLD G. VATTER Associate Professor of Economics Oregon State College OREGON STATE COLLEGE CORVALLIS, OREGON, PRINTED AT THE COLLEGE PRESS. 1955. OREGON STATE MONOGRAPHS Studies in Economics Number 4, August 1955 Published by Oregon State College Corvallis, Oregon ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Foreword iv Introduction 1 Industrial Evolution and Interfirm Relationships 1 Contemporary Theory and the Small Firm 4 Nature and Objectives of the Present Study 6 Materials and Methods 9 Differentiation in Market Opportunity : Creamery Butter Industry 13 Origins of Factory Butter Production 13 Procurement of Raw Material 14 Differentiation of. Firms : Centralizer and Local 16 Differentiation and the Quality of Cream 18 Price Discrimination in the Raw Material Market 19 Comparative Costs : Centralizers and Locals 20 Marketing : Early Differentiation in Structure 21 Locals, Centralizers, and the Marketing Function 23 Cooperative Marketing and the Small Creamery 24 Subordination of Locals to Large-Scale Marketing Agencies 27 Recent Innovations and the Local Creamery 30 Small Enterprise Mortality : Commercial Wheat Flour Milling 33 Introduction 33 Economic Background of the Minneapolis Industry 35 Beginnings of Interfirm Differentiation 37 Formation of the Leading Minneapolis Group 41 Market Maturation, Elimination of Small Mills, and Expansion of the Minne- apolis Group, 1900-1920 43 Buffalo 44 Differentiation in Marketing 47 The Southwest 48 Excess Capacity, Stabilization, Consolidation, and Enlargement of the Small Miller, 1920-1940 51 New Entry and Small Enterprise : The Automobile 66 Introduction 66 Entry in the Period of Rapid Growth 67 Maturation, Oligopoly, and Closure of Entry 70 Theoretical Aspects of the Entry Problem 73 Special Conditions of Entry After World War II 77 Stabilization and Dependent Enterprise : The Glass Container Industry 81 Introduction and General Characteristics 81 Small Enterprise : A Definition 83 Stabilization, Suppression of Entry, and Dependent Enterprise 84 Capacity Control and Dependent Small Enterprise 89 Production Capacity and Intergroup Quota Rivalry 92 Interfirm Relationships Under a Stabilization Program 96 Summary : Toward a Theory of Small Enterprise 100 Testing the Working Hypothesis 100 Functional Characteristics of Small Business 109 Survival of the Small Manufacturer 111 Conclusion 116 iii FOREWORD This monographic study of the small firm in dominant-group industries is a condensed presentation of an analysis originally submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of doctor of philosophy at the University of California (Berkeley). Although certain of the chapters, notably those on the butter and flour milling industries, and the general theoretical discussion, have been substantially shortened, it is hoped that the manuscript as a whole has been strengthened as a result of a painstaking abbreviation process. The study represents a good many years of investigation into the small business problem, years in which my indebtedness to others has been great. Among those, mention should be made of Professors J. M. Clark and Paul Brissenden at Columbia University, who first encouraged me to undertake research into the problems of the small firm. Acknowledgment is also due those at the University of California who had an important part in shaping the present project. The late Professor Leo Rogin directed the initial stages of this investigation. Subsequently, Professor Joe S. Bain devoted many hours to a careful critique of every aspect of the manuscript as it moved toward completion. Others who made significant contributions were Pro­ fessors Robert Brady, William Fellner, and Henry E. Erdman. iv I INTRODUCTION 1. INDUSTRIAL EVOLUTION AND INTERFIRM RELATIONSHIPS Widespread contemporary discussion of the problems of small enter­ prise has already penetrated the sphere of public policy, and, following the usual historical sequence, is currently beginning to cause a stir in academic circles. Attention to the special status of the small concern has generally been oriented toward the modern predicament of what is more popularly termed our "free enterprise system." Our awareness of that predicament was immeasurably sharpened during the harsh years of the early 1930's, and it was precisely this impetus which gave rise to a reconsideration of our traditional conceptions of the role played by the small entrepreneur. The great depression placed entrepreneurship on trial, and in the quest for explanations of its apparent delinquency, we probed widely and deeply into our economic organism. More searching questions than formerly came to be asked regarding the economic evolution of our industrial markets. The competitive status of the smaller producer, in modern industry, to which the present work is primarily devoted, is understandable only in the setting of the general pattern of industry. Hence, the advances in certain aspects of the general theory of business enterprise in recent years are pertinent to the problem here under consideration. Central to the economic setting of small enterprise is the developing concentration of production and centralization of control. This is the overriding secular factor of economic history which has induced the wide­ spread reconsideration of conventional theories of monopoly and competition so characteristic of economic analysis over the last two decades. The work of describing the growth of concentration, begun so well by Berle and Means with the publication of The Modern Corporation and Private Property in 1933,1 was carried forward by the Federal Government through the National Resources Committee's Structure of the American Economy,2 the investigations of the Temporary National Economic Committee, and the Congressional committees on small business. Although the facts of increasing concentration and centralization have been questioned by some, the signifi­ cant controversy revolves around the implications of such facts for the functioning of industry and for the theory of business enterprise. More specifically, the dominance of the large corporation in so many of our industrial markets has brought into sharper focus the problem of the place of the smaller producer in such markets. A closer scrutiny of the 1 Berle, A. A., and Means, G. C.,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Industry-Technology Life Cycle: an Integrating Meta-Model?
    THE INDUSTRY-TECHNOLOGY LIFE CYCLE: AN INTEGRATING META-MODEL? Robert U. Ayres International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis Lazenburg, Austria RR-87-3 March 1987 INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR APPLIED SYSTEMS ANALYSIS Laxenburg, Austria International Standard Book Number 8-7045-0081-x Research Reports, which record research conducted at IIASA, are independently reviewed before publication. However, the views and opinions they express are not necessarily those of the Institute or the National Member Organizations that support it. Copyright @ 1987 International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Cover design by Martin Schobel Printed by Novographic, Vienna, Austria Summary This report attempts to answer a rather deep question: To what extent can "pure" economics explain economic growth and technological change? By "pure" economics, it is meant the relationships governing the behavior of abstract enti- ties, producing abstract products or services for sale in an idealized competitive market. Pure economics, in the above sense, admits R&D and innovations of an unspecified kind; it also admits improvements (unspecified) and learning curves or experience curves. The report concludes, however, that the dynamic behavior of the product "life cycle" in specific cases, and the observed clustering of innovations in partic- ular fields at particular times, with periods of rapid progress followed by slow- downs, can only by explained by also taking into account the preexisting state of technology, and the laws of nature.
    [Show full text]
  • Innovation Adoption and the Product Life Cycle
    INNOVATION ADOPTION AND THE PRODUCT LIFE CYCLE Charlie Karlsson Umeå Economic Studies No. 185 UNIVERSITY OF UMEÅ 1988 INNOVATION ADOPTION AND THE PRODUCT LIFE CYCLE Charlie Karlsson AKADEMISK AVHANDLING som för avläggande av ekonomie doktorsexamen vid samhällsvetenskapliga fakulteten vid Umeå universitet framlägges till offentlig granskning torsdagen den 6 oktober 1988 kl 13.00 i hörsal C, samhällsvetarhuset. INNOVATION ADOPTION AND THE PRODUCT LIFE CYCLE Charlie Karlsson Umeå Economic Studies No. 185 UNIVERSITY OF UMEÅ 1988 *The research that is reported here and which is the result of a co-operation between the Regional Science Research Unit at the University of Karlstad and CERUM has been supported financially chiefly by The Bank of Sweden Tercentenary Foundation (Grant Dnr 84/266). Author and title Karlsson, Charlie (1988). Innovation Adoption and the Product Life Cycle. Umeå Economic Studies No. 185, 232 pages. Abstract The objective of the study is to present a number of hypotheses concerning (i) the adoption of innovations for product and process development within enterprises (establishments), (ii) the spatial diffusion of innovations, and (iii) the adoption of applications of information technology to automate the production processes within enterprises (establishments), and to test these hypotheses empirically by means of econometric methods, using a data base containing primary data from several regions in Sweden on the adoption of different applications of information technology at the establishment level. The study has two main parts; the theoretical foundation and the empirical results. In the theoretical part of the study product and process development by means of new innovations is discussed within the general framework provided by the product life cycle theory.
    [Show full text]
  • Post-Keynesian Economics - Challenging the Neo-Classical Mainstream
    Munich Personal RePEc Archive Post-Keynesian Economics - Challenging the Neo-Classical Mainstream Heise, Arne University of Hamburg 2019 Online at https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/99280/ MPRA Paper No. 99280, posted 27 Mar 2020 08:06 UTC Post-Keynesian Economics – Challenging the Neo-Classical Mainstream Arne Heise University of Hamburg Department of Socioeconomics VMP 9 20146 Hamburg [email protected] Abstract This article takes an in-depth look at post-Keynesianism as a paradigmatic alter- native to the dominant neoclassical mainstream. It quickly becomes clear that post-Keynesianism is not a unified school of thought, but rather an assortment of theoretical approaches that share certain methodological and epistemological similarities and characteristic postulates. The Article does not attempt to describe the full array of Kaleckian, Kaldorian and Sraffian variants of post-Keynesian theory but instead analysis the paradigmatic and formal structure of one particu- lar form of post-Keynesianism, the monetary theory of production in order to re- construct these characteristic postulates from the axiomatic core of post- Keynesianism. It then sets out the theory of market participation, an alternative theory of economic policy that builds on monetary production economics. JEL codes: B 41, B 50, B 59, E 11, E 12, E 60 Keywords: post-Keynesianism, heterodox economics, neoclassical economics, paradigms 1 1. Introduction – is there any such thing as (the) post-Keynesianism? The challenge of how to describe the body of thought generally known as post- Keynesianism can be approached in very different ways. You could point out that post-Keynesian work is not situated within any unifying paradigmatic framework; rather, there is a series of different approaches with different founding figures: John Maynard Keynes, Michał Kalecki, Nicholas Kaldor, Joan Robinson, Piero Sraffa and Hyman P.
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture Notes on Pricing
    Sloan School of Management 15.013 – Industrial Economics for Strategic Decisions Massachusetts Institute of Technology Professor Robert S. Pindyck Lecture Notes on Pricing (August 2010) These lecture notes cover a number of topics related to strategic pricing. I begin with a discussion of markup pricing. In 15.010, you saw how the profit-maximizing price-cost margin is inversely related to the firm’s price elasticity of demand. (If you have forgotten this, go back and reread Chapter 10 of Pindyck & Rubinfeld, Microeconomics.) But how does one obtain an estimate of the firm’s price elasticity of demand? We will see how this can be done in the simple Cournot model, and we will also see how a linear approximation to a general demand curve can be used to simplify the entire pricing problem. Next, I turn to product line pricing. We discussed this briefly in the context of pricing and bundling complementary products; here, we will go into it in more detail. Afterwards, I turn to pricing in markets with strong network externalities. First, we will see how the markup pricing rule can be adjusted to account for a positive or negative network externality. Second, we will examine dynamic pricing policies. In particular, how should one set price when competing with a firm in a “winner-take-all” market? If the firm currently has a small market share, should it lower its price aggressively to try to capture more market share from the leading firm, or maintain a high price and lets its market share dwindle further. Finally, I will discuss some of the issues that arise with long-term contracting.
    [Show full text]
  • Dynamic Optimization of an Oligopoly Model of Advertising Ashutosh
    Dynamic Optimization of an Oligopoly Model of Advertising Ashutosh Prasad1, Suresh P. Sethi The University of Texas at Dallas November 2003 1 Corresponding author. Tel.: 972-883-2027. Fax.: 972-883-2799. Email [email protected]. Dynamic Optimization of an Oligopoly Model of Advertising Abstract. We examine an oligopoly model of advertising competition where each firm’s market share depends on its own and its competitors’ advertising decisions. A differential game model is developed and used to derive the closed-loop Nash equilibrium under symmetric as well as asymmetric competition. We obtain explicit solutions under certain plausible conditions, and discuss the effects of an increase in the number of competing firms on advertising expenditure, market share and profitability. Key Words: Advertising, Oligopoly, Differential games, Optimization. 1 1. Introduction Many industries are characterized by firms competing for market share primarily on the basis of advertising. The markets for cola drinks, beer and cigarettes are some examples that have been studied in the literature (Erickson 1992, Fruchter and Kalish 1997). Each firm’s advertising acts to increase its market share while the competitors’ advertising acts to reduce its market share. Owing to the carry-over dynamics of advertising, an analytical solution in continuous time typically starts by modeling the competitive interaction as a differential game, where each firm tries to increase its profit while taking into consideration the response of its competitors. Whereas elements of the marketing environment such as carry-over dynamics, competition, competitive and non-competitive decay have been described by individual models, understanding optimal advertising policies in differential games is hindered by the difficulty in obtaining explicit solutions.
    [Show full text]
  • How to Create a Growth-Oriented Market Constellation for South Africa
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Heise, Arne Working Paper How to create a growth-oriented market constellation for South Africa Arbeitspapiere für Staatswissenschaft, No. 22 Provided in Cooperation with: University of Hamburg, Department of Socioeconomics Suggested Citation: Heise, Arne (2007) : How to create a growth-oriented market constellation for South Africa, Arbeitspapiere für Staatswissenschaft, No. 22, Universität Hamburg, Department Wirtschaft und Politik, Hamburg This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/27090 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially
    [Show full text]
  • Barriers to Entry 2005
    Barriers to Entry 2005 The OECD Competition Committee debated barriers to entry in October 2005. This document includes an executive summary and the documents from the meeting: an analytical note by Mr. Jeremy West of the OECD, written submissions from Brazil, Chinese Taipei, the Czech Republic, the European Commission, Finland, France, Germany, Hungary, Ireland, Japan, Korea, Lithuania, Mexico, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Spain, Switzerland, Turkey, the United Kingdom, the United States, and BIAC, as well as an aide-memoire of the discussion. The concept of barriers to entry is important to many aspects of competition policy, but the question of exactly what constitutes an entry barrier has never been universally resolved. While most competition enforcement agencies indicated that they do not need a fixed definition of barriers to entry, several others have one and have found it to be valuable. A barrier to entry does not have to prevent firms from entering a market forever in order to affect competition and consumer welfare; sometimes merely retarding the arrival of new firms is enough. Therefore, entry conditions are usually analysed from a dynamic, rather than a static perspective. Furthermore, entry analysis goes beyond asking whether entry barriers exist and whether entry could conceivably occur. Typically, it also asks whether entry would occur and, if so, whether it is likely to happen quickly enough and be substantial enough to fix the anticompetitive problem that is central to the case. Conditions that constitute entry barriers may be structural or strategic. While structural barriers are sometimes relatively easy to quantify, strategic barriers are often difficult to measure.
    [Show full text]
  • Bundling for Flexibility and Variety: an Economic Model for Multi-Producer Value Aggregation
    Bundling for Flexibility and Variety: An Economic Model for Multi-Producer Value Aggregation Hemant K. Bhargava1 [email protected] University of California Davis ABSTRACT Many markets feature an economic structure in which value is co-created by multiple producers and aggregated into a common bundle by a producer-consortium or independent firm. Examples in- clude in-home video entertainment, technology goods and services, multi-sourced data platforms, and patent pools. This paper develops an economic model to study demand, production choices, revenue-sharing, and relative market power in such markets. Producers in these markets are not rivalrous competitors in the usual zero-sum sense, because output of each casts an externality on production decisions of others and total market demand expands with total output, albeit with di- minishing returns. This property allows multiple producers to flourish in equilibrium (vs. just one with the most favorable technological or cost structure), and more so when the market ex- pands less quickly with total output. Equilibrium production quantities of competitors are strategic complements, yet competition between producers does manifest itself, e.g., if one acquires better production technology (i.e., makes value units at lower cost) then the equilibrium production lev- els of other producers are reduced. Insights are also derived for alternative market structures, e.g., producers have more output and earn higher profit when organized into a distribution consortium (e.g., Hulu, or consortia of zoos or museums) vs. relying on a separate retailer. Mergers between producers have similar effect. The formulation enables us to rigorously answer economic questions ranging from pricing, revenue sharing, and production levels in a static setting, to market dynamics covering both the causes and effects of changes in industry structure.
    [Show full text]
  • Pricing Policies for New Products
    Pricing Policies for New Products by Joel Dean Harvard Business Review Reprint 76604 NOVEMBER–DECEMBERHBR 1976 Pricing Policies for New Products by Joel Dean ow to price a new product is a top manage- 1. Technical maturity, indicated by declining rate ment puzzle that is too often solved by cost- of product development, increasing standard- Htheology and hunch. This article suggests a ization among brands, and increasing stability of pricing policy geared to the dynamic nature of a new manufacturing processes and knowledge about them. product’s competitive status. Today’s high rate of 2. Market maturity, indicated by consumer accep- innovation makes the economic evolution of a new tance of the basic service idea, by widespread product a strategic guide to practical pricing. belief that the products of most manufacturers New products have a protected distinctiveness which will perform satisfactorily, and by enough fa- is doomed to progressive degeneration from competi- miliarity and sophistication to permit consum- tive inroads. The invention of a new marketable spe- ers to compare brands competently. cialty is usually followed by a period of patent protec- tion when markets are still hesitant and unexplored HBR first published this article in November 1950 as a and when product design is fluid. Then comes a practical guide to the problems involved in pricing new period of rapid expansion of sales as market accep- products. Particularly in the early stages of competition, it tance is gained. is necessary to estimate demand, anticipate the effect of Next the product becomes a target for competitive various possible combinations of prices, and choose the most suitable promotion policy.
    [Show full text]