Relativity Needs a Manifold with a Metric to Introduce Spinors

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Relativity Needs a Manifold with a Metric to Introduce Spinors NATURE VOL. 313 14 FEBRUARV 1985 607 ---------------BOOKREVIEWS,--------------::..: Advertisement Penrose's way with paid. While one needs only a differential manifold to speak of tensor fields, one Keep in touch with the foremost relativity needs a manifold with a metric to introduce spinors. However, in general relativity, laser research through Abhay Ashtekar space-time manifolds do, naturally, come with metrics which dictate physical Spinors and Space-Time. Vol. 1 Two­ processes such as propagation of light and Spinor Calculus and Relativistic Fields. ticking of clocks. In this setting, By R. Penrose and W. Rindler. conceptually, spinors are indeed a more Cambridge University Press: 1984. natural starting point than world-vectors Pp. 458. £45, $89.50. and tensors. The use of spinors also has technical advantages. Since the spin-space is a two-dimensional (complex) vector AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL ALTHOUGH spinors were introduced by space, it comes equipped with a unique (up Elie Cart an about 70 years ago, their use in to an overall multiplicative factor) non­ Editors:Asia Koichi Shimoda, Keio general relativity became common only degenerate 2-form. Together with its University, Japan. East Europ"e {';( USSR rather recently. It is in fact easy to trace the inverse, the 2-form can be used to identify V. S. Letokhov, USSRAcademyof history of this development. contravariant and covariant spinors, that Sciences. Western Europ"!;'J. Joussot· The first major event was the lecture is, to raise and lower indices. Further, a Dubien, Laboratoire de Chimie by Roger Penrose, entitled "General spinor which is anti-symmetric in any two Physique, Talence, France & R. J. Relativity in Spinor Form", given at the of its indices is proportional, in those Vetter, CNRS II, Orsay, France. ~ Canada PauiJ. Dagdigian, Johns third international conference on general indices, to the 2-form and the proportion­ Hopkins University & Ahmed H. Zewail, relativity and gravitation, held at ality factor is easily obtained by contracting California Institute of Technology, USA Royaumont, near Paris, in June 1959. The the two indices in question; consequently reason behind the success of spinor only symmetric spinors matter. These simpli­ '~ .. with the ferment ofactivity in laser methods is perhaps best explained in the fications are not shared by world-tensors research and the quality ofits opening sentence of Penrose's report in the because the tangent space at a space-time international board, this newjournal proceedings of the conference. It reads: point is four (real) dimensional. shoutd rapidly gain momentum and respectability" I propose to show that if a spinor calculus is used The monograph first introduces the - The Times Higher in general relativity, instead of the usual tensor reader to the geometry of spinors in Education Supplement calculus, many of the important expressions of Minkowski space, then treats in detail the theory take on a surprisingly simple form. LASER CHEMISTRY is the first journal spinor algebra and calculus in the abstract to unite international research activity The elegance and the power of the new index notation and concludes by applying in this rapidly developing field. It is techniques made an immediate impact. I the framework to the study of various intended to bridge the gap between am told that a group of younger par­ physical fields in curved space-time. It is physics and chemistry laser-related ticipants, several of whom were destined to written with a wonderful sense of balance. research. Thejournal publishes become leaders in general relativity, sought Thus, while the treatment is clearly original theoretical and applied papers out Penrose for additional evening lectures rigorous, the style is not terse. There are as well as overviews covering a large during the conference itself. Spinorial remarks to assist the reader to see why one number of topics, but with particular techniques soon began to appear in is doing what one is doing and where one is focus on the following: laser·selective chemistry; reactive scattering and numerous research articles, particularly in headed, and beautiful figures to help state-to-state dynamics; multiphoton the subject of gravitational radiation. visualization of many constructions. dissociation, ionization and The field next received a boost from the Consequently, the book will serve at least absorption phenomena; laser-assisted detailed article by Felix Pirani in the three purposes: it can be used as a text in a collisions and reactions in l.H ilks and on proceedings of the 1964 Brandeis summer "special topics" course in general relativity surfaces; primary processes in photo­ school, which made the subject accessible or mathematical physics; it can be read chemistry and chemiluminescence; to beginning research students. profitably by individual graduate students molecular relaxation processes; Penrose himself had given a series of and beginning researchers wanting to dephasing. energy redistribution and lectures on spinors somewhat earlier and become acquainted with the spino rial ultrafast dynamics; new laser the present monograph grew out of notes description of the world on their own; and techniques; application of lasers in biolOgy. taken by Wolfgang Rindler. Although the it will be a very valuable source for existence of these notes was well known in advanced researchers. Here, at last, one For speedy publication, LASER the relativity community, they did not can find, in one place, the numerous CHEMISTRY also publishes 'rapid receive wide circulation and their spinorial formulae - not to mention communications' in camera·ready appearance in book form, polished and up­ constructions, theorems and their proofs form. dated, has been eagerly awaited for more - that researchers in general relativity so Subscription Information: than 15 years! During the hiatus the field often need, present~d in the most general 6 issues per volume ISSN: 0278-6273 has grown and with it the size of the book. context. Current volume: Volume 6, 1984- 1985 In addition, the book has several novel Institutional rate: $ I 46/volume It is now a work in two parts. The second Individual rate: $74lvolume volume, to be published at the end of this features which will make it attractive to a (Individual rates available only to those who year, will contain material on null infinity wider variety of readers. One is the subscribe directly from the publisher and pay and twistor theory, as well as certain recent systematic development and use of the through personal cheques or credit cards.) developments such as the proof of the abstract index notation. This notation was SE~DPORPREESAMPLECOPY positive energy theorems and the definition invented by Penrose in order to treat tensor To order, send cheque or credit card of quasi-local conserved quantities. fields in an intrinsic, coordinate-free way information to: Roughly, one can think of spinors as and yet retain the flexibility offered by the 1.._ Harwood square roots of vectors; it takes the product presence of indices, which is so useful in ... Academic of a spinor with its complex conjugate to long calculations. In this notation, indices ap Publishers make a vector. It is therefore only natural serve simply as abstract markers which tell Marketing Dept. 50 West 23 Street, to regard spinors as the primitive objects the nature of the tensor considered (for New York. NY 10010, USA or I Bedford from which vectors and tensors can be example its contravariant versus covariant Street. London WC2E 9HD, UK built. In this, though, there is a price to be character) and do not take on numerical © 1985 Nature Publishing Group 601 ------------------------------------_____ BOOK~EVVS,---------------------NA~~~-V~O~L~"3~13~1~4~Am==RU~AR~Y~I~= values. Mathematicians should find this British English from North America. The notation most interesting. Another feature Pronouncing on the popular myth that the English spoken in is that 2-component spinors are used the United States is antiquated and there­ throughout the book; the simplicity and language fore somehow "purer" than that spoken utility of these objects is thus brought Joanna Czechowska in Britain, he largely dispels; in the home and high energy physicists may well seventeenth century words such as fertile. succumb to their charm. Also, the leisure and dormitory were pronounced in definition of a manifold in terms of its ring The English Language. By Robert Burchfield. both the British English and American of smooth functions should please many a English manner. mathematical physicist. While this Oxford University Press: 1985. Pp.194. £9.50, $19.95. This is a brief but clear and immensely approach is not new, to my knowledge readable book. Fifteen-hundred years of this is the first time that it appears in a English has been condensed into some monograph accessible to physicists. DURING the fifth century AD the Roman 200 pages of text without losing sight There are, however, a few omissions that establishment moved out of the British Isles of how rich, diverse and complex our lang­ I personally regret. The first is the and Germanic tribes from northern uage is. 0 geometrical interpretation of Lie Germany and southern Denmark moved in. derivatives, and of curvature tensors. The descendant of the language they spoke Joanna Czechowska is on the staff of Nature. While the "algebraic or axiomatic is now the mother tongue of more than 300 approach" to derivative operators used million people worldwide and the second here is excellent, in that it brings to the language of many millions more. Robert forefront the properties that one Burchfield's book documents the history of African past frequently needs in practice, graduate English from the fifth century to the students would have been greatly helped if present day, tracing the changes caused by A.C. Hamilton the geometrical structure involved had the absorption of other languages, the been somewhere explained. Secondly, it influence of English settlers in overseas Southern African Prehistory and would have been helpful if a symbol- the colonies and the increasing introduction of Paleoenvironments.
Recommended publications
  • Covariant Phase Space for Gravity with Boundaries: Metric Vs Tetrad Formulations
    Covariant phase space for gravity with boundaries: metric vs tetrad formulations J. Fernando Barbero G.c,d Juan Margalef-Bentabola,c Valle Varob,c Eduardo J.S. Villaseñorb,c aInstitute for Gravitation and the Cosmos and Physics Department. Penn State University. PA 16802, USA. bDepartamento de Matemáticas, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Avda. de la Universidad 30, 28911 Leganés, Spain. cGrupo de Teorías de Campos y Física Estadística. Instituto Gregorio Millán (UC3M). Unidad Asociada al Instituto de Estructura de la Materia, CSIC, Madrid, Spain. dInstituto de Estructura de la Materia, CSIC, Serrano 123, 28006, Madrid, Spain E-mail: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Abstract: We use covariant phase space methods to study the metric and tetrad formula- tions of General Relativity in a manifold with boundary and compare the results obtained in both approaches. Proving their equivalence has been a long-lasting problem that we solve here by using the cohomological approach provided by the relative bicomplex framework. This setting provides a clean and ambiguity-free way to describe the solution spaces and associated symplectic structures. We also compute several relevant charges in both schemes and show that they are equivalent, as expected. arXiv:2103.06362v2 [gr-qc] 14 Jun 2021 Contents I Introduction1 II The geometric arena2 II.1 M as a space-time2 II.2 From M-vector fields to F-vector fields3 II.3 CPS-Algorithm4 IIIGeneral Relativity in terms of metrics5 IV General relativity in terms of tetrads8 V Metric vs Tetrad formulation 13 V.1 Space of solutions 13 V.2 Presymplectic structures 14 VI Conclusions 15 A Ancillary material 16 A.1 Mathematical background 16 A.2 Some computations in the metric case 19 A.3 Some tetrad computations 21 Bibliography 22 I Introduction Space-time boundaries play a prominent role in classical and quantum General Relativity (GR).
    [Show full text]
  • Pos(Rio De Janeiro 2012)002 † ∗ [email protected] Speaker
    Loop Quantum Gravity and the Very Early Universe PoS(Rio de Janeiro 2012)002 Abhay Ashtekar∗† Institute for Gravitational Physics and Geometry, Physics Department, Penn State, University Park, PA 16802, U.S.A. E-mail: [email protected] This brief overview is addressed to beginning researchers. It begins with a discussion of the distinguishing features of loop quantum gravity, then illustrates the type of issues that must be faced by any quantum gravity theory, and concludes with a brief summary of the status of these issues in loop quantum gravity. For concreteness the emphasis is on cosmology. Since several introductory as well as detailed reviews of loop quantum gravity are already available in the literature, the focus is on explaining the overall viewpoint and providing a short bibliography to introduce the interested reader to literature. 7th Conference Mathematical Methods in Physics - Londrina 2012, 16 to 20 April 2012 Rio de Janeiro, Brazil ∗Speaker. †A footnote may follow. c Copyright owned by the author(s) under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike Licence. http://pos.sissa.it/ Loop Quantum Gravity Abhay Ashtekar Loop quantum gravity (LQG) is a non-perturbative approach aimed at unifying general rela- tivity and quantum physics. Its distinguishing features are: i) Background independence, and, ii) Underlying unity of the mathematical framework used to describe gravity and the other three basic forces of nature. It is background independent in the sense that there are no background fields, not even a space-time metric. All fields —whether they represent matter constituents, or gauge fields that mediate fundamental forces between them, or space- time geometry itself— are treated on the same footing.
    [Show full text]
  • BEYOND SPACE and TIME the Secret Network of the Universe: How Quantum Geometry Might Complete Einstein’S Dream
    BEYOND SPACE AND TIME The secret network of the universe: How quantum geometry might complete Einstein’s dream By Rüdiger Vaas With the help of a few innocuous - albeit subtle and potent - equations, Abhay Ashtekar can escape the realm of ordinary space and time. The mathematics developed specifically for this purpose makes it possible to look behind the scenes of the apparent stage of all events - or better yet: to shed light on the very foundation of reality. What sounds like black magic, is actually incredibly hard physics. Were Albert Einstein alive today, it would have given him great pleasure. For the goal is to fulfil the big dream of a unified theory of gravity and the quantum world. With the new branch of science of quantum geometry, also called loop quantum gravity, Ashtekar has come close to fulfilling this dream - and tries thereby, in addition, to answer the ultimate questions of physics: the mysteries of the big bang and black holes. "On the Planck scale there is a precise, rich, and discrete structure,” says Ashtekar, professor of physics and Director of the Center for Gravitational Physics and Geometry at Pennsylvania State University. The Planck scale is the smallest possible length scale with units of the order of 10-33 centimeters. That is 20 orders of magnitude smaller than what the world’s best particle accelerators can detect. At this scale, Einstein’s theory of general relativity fails. Its subject is the connection between space, time, matter and energy. But on the Planck scale it gives unreasonable values - absurd infinities and singularities.
    [Show full text]
  • Laudatio for Professor Abhay Ashtekar
    Laudatio for Professor Abhay Ashtekar Professor Ashtekar is a remarkable ¯gure in the ¯eld of Ein- stein's gravity. This being the Einstein Year and, moreover, the World Year of Physics, one can hardly think of anyone more ¯tting to be honoured for his research and his achievements { achievements that have influenced the most varied aspects of gravitational theory in a profound way. Prof. Ashtekar is the Eberly Professor of Physics and the Di- rector of the Institute for Gravitational Physics and Geometry at Penn State University in the United States. His research in gravitational theory is notable for its breadth, covering quantum gravity and generalizations of quantum mechanics, but also clas- sical general relativity, the mathematical theory of black holes and gravitational waves. Our view of the world has undergone many revisions in the past, two of which, arguably the most revolutionary, were ini- tiated by Einstein in his annus mirabilis, 1905. For one thing, the theory of special relativity turned our notion of space and time on its ear for speeds approaching that of light. At the same time, Einstein's explanation of the photoelectric e®ect heralded the coming of quantum theory. Many of the best minds in theo- retical physics, including Einstein himself, have been trying for years to ¯nd a uni¯ed theory of relativity and quantum theory. Such a theory, often called quantum gravity, could, for example, provide an explanation for the initial moments of our universe just after the big bang. Especially noteworthy is Prof. Ashtekar's work on the canon- ical quantization of gravitation, which is based upon a reformu- lation of Einstein's ¯eld equations that Ashtekar presented 1986.
    [Show full text]
  • MATTERS of GRAVITY, a Newsletter for the Gravity Community, Number 3
    MATTERS OF GRAVITY Number 3 Spring 1994 Table of Contents Editorial ................................................... ................... 2 Correspondents ................................................... ............ 2 Gravity news: Open Letter to gravitational physicists, Beverly Berger ........................ 3 A Missouri relativist in King Gustav’s Court, Clifford Will .................... 6 Gary Horowitz wins the Xanthopoulos award, Abhay Ashtekar ................ 9 Research briefs: Gamma-ray bursts and their possible cosmological implications, Peter Meszaros 12 Current activity and results in laboratory gravity, Riley Newman ............. 15 Update on representations of quantum gravity, Donald Marolf ................ 19 Ligo project report: December 1993, Rochus E. Vogt ......................... 23 Dark matter or new gravity?, Richard Hammond ............................. 25 Conference Reports: Gravitational waves from coalescing compact binaries, Curt Cutler ........... 28 Mach’s principle: from Newton’s bucket to quantum gravity, Dieter Brill ..... 31 Cornelius Lanczos international centenary conference, David Brown .......... 33 Third Midwest relativity conference, David Garfinkle ......................... 36 arXiv:gr-qc/9402002v1 1 Feb 1994 Editor: Jorge Pullin Center for Gravitational Physics and Geometry The Pennsylvania State University University Park, PA 16802-6300 Fax: (814)863-9608 Phone (814)863-9597 Internet: [email protected] 1 Editorial Well, this newsletter is growing into its third year and third number with a lot of strength. In fact, maybe too much strength. Twelve articles and 37 (!) pages. In this number, apart from the ”traditional” research briefs and conference reports we also bring some news for the community, therefore starting to fulfill the original promise of bringing the gravity/relativity community closer together. As usual I am open to suggestions, criticisms and proposals for articles for the next issue, due September 1st. Many thanks to the authors and the correspondents who made this issue possible.
    [Show full text]
  • 150 Abhay Ashtekar
    ICTS PUBLIC LECTURE BIG BANG, BLACK HOLES AND GRAVITATIONAL WAVES Illustrations of Paradigm Shifts in Fundamental Science Big Bang, Black Holes and Gravitational Waves now appear as compelling – even obvious – consequences of general relativity. Therefore, it may seem surprising that none of these ideas were readily accepted. Not only was there considerable debate, but in fact leading figures were often arguing on what turned out to be the “wrong side” of history. These developments provide excellent lessons for younger researchers on how science un-folds. Paradigm shifts in science occur when younger researchers have the courage not to accept ideas merely because they are mainstream; patience to systematically develop novel avenues they deeply believe in; and maturity to accept that a variety of factors – not all logical or even science related – can drive or slow down scientific progress. ABHAY ASHTEKAR Pennsylvania State University Abhay Ashtekar is the Eberly Professor of Physics and the Director of the Institute for Gravitational Physics and Geometry at Pennsylvania State University. His research interests span different aspects of General Relativity, Quantum Gravity and Black Holes. The recipient of the Einstein Prize and the Senior Research Prize of the Humboldt Foundation, his work is widely recognized. He is an elected member of the US National Academy of Sciences, Elected Fellow of the American Association for Advancement of Science, American Physical Society and Honorary Fellow of the Indian Academy of Sciences, and has served as the president of International Society for General Relativity and Gravitation. 4 pm, 21 August, 2019 ICTS, Bengaluru Register online https://bit.ly/AbhayAshtekar BG Image – Frame from a simulation of the merger of two black holes and the resulting emission of gravitational radiation (colored fields).
    [Show full text]
  • AC2 Report to IUPAP 2016.Pages
    Report of Affiliated Commission AC.2 for 2015-16 submitted by Beverly K. Berger, Secretary The principal event of the year for the International Society on General Relativity and Gravitation (AC2) was the triennial GR conference. The 21st International Conference on General Relativity and Gravitation, GR21, was held 10 – 15 July 2016 at Columbia University. The scientific highlights of the meeting were talks and activities related to the first direct detection of gravitational waves by the LIGO Scientific Collaboration and the Virgo Collaboration—a momentous celebration of the Centennial of Einstein's first presentation of general relativity in November 1915. Approximately 650 registered participants attended the meeting. Sponsorship from IUPAP for this meeting, and AC2's own limited funds, assisted some of these participants. As usual, the conference had plenary talks in the morning, covering the whole field of AC2's interests. In the afternoons there were parallel contributed papers and poster sessions. There were 15 plenary talks (5 of the speakers being women) and 17 parallel sessions (7 of the chairs being women). Abstracts of all submissions became available online1 after the meeting. The abstracts of all parallel session talks and posters and the slides from the parallel session talks are available on the conference website.2 Slides from the plenary talks will be available soon. During the meeting, several prize winners were honored by AC2 and GWIC (WG11): The IUPAP Young Scientist Prize in General Relativity and Gravitation was first awarded at GR20 in 2013. The three winners since then, Jorge Santos, Stanford University and Cambridge University (2014), Nicolas Yunes, Montana State University (2015), and Ivan Agullo, Louisiana State University (2016) were recognized at the meeting.
    [Show full text]
  • Books in Brief Early Leader, Swayed by the Mistaken Belief That Others’ Choices Tell Them About Standard
    BOOKS & ARTS COMMENT observed differences in success — judged by popularity or sales, for example — follow from network effects. People rush to buy an Books in brief early leader, swayed by the mistaken belief that others’ choices tell them about standard. Quantum Space This results in huge differences in outcome Jim Baggott OXFORD UNIV. PRESS (2018) that have nothing at all to do with quality. Prolific physics writer Jim Baggott is back with a terrific page-turner That phenomenon is the subject of the second on loop quantum gravity (LQG) — the theory posited as a solution law: “Performance is bounded, but success is to that chasm in physics between quantum mechanics and the unbounded.” Take the top 100 wines entered general theory of relativity. Baggott digs into the how and why of into a competition. Their true differences in what LQG might reveal about “space, time and the universe”, tracing quality, for example in clarity or varietal char- its evolution through the work of Abhay Ashtekar, Lee Smolin, acter, are generally small: they’re all produced Carlo Rovelli and others, to its current implications for, say, the physics by top winemakers using similar technology. of black holes. Baggott masterfully tenderizes the scientific chewiness Yet one wine, because of the amplifying power and is careful not to over-egg what is, after all, a work in progress. of social networks, might enjoy orders of magnitude more sales than others. Social scientists have known about such The Republican Reversal effects for decades, although research by James Morton Turner and Andrew C. Isenberg HARVARD UNIV.
    [Show full text]
  • Emergence of Time in Loop Quantum Gravity∗
    Emergence of time in Loop Quantum Gravity∗ Suddhasattwa Brahma,1y 1 Center for Field Theory and Particle Physics, Fudan University, 200433 Shanghai, China Abstract Loop quantum gravity has formalized a robust scheme in resolving classical singu- larities in a variety of symmetry-reduced models of gravity. In this essay, we demon- strate that the same quantum correction which is crucial for singularity resolution is also responsible for the phenomenon of signature change in these models, whereby one effectively transitions from a `fuzzy' Euclidean space to a Lorentzian space-time in deep quantum regimes. As long as one uses a quantization scheme which re- spects covariance, holonomy corrections from loop quantum gravity generically leads to non-singular signature change, thereby giving an emergent notion of time in the theory. Robustness of this mechanism is established by comparison across large class of midisuperspace models and allowing for diverse quantization ambiguities. Con- ceptual and mathematical consequences of such an underlying quantum-deformed space-time are briefly discussed. 1 Introduction It is not difficult to imagine a mind to which the sequence of things happens not in space but only in time like the sequence of notes in music. For such a mind such conception of reality is akin to the musical reality in which Pythagorean geometry can have no meaning. | Tagore to Einstein, 1920. We are yet to come up with a formal theory of quantum gravity which is mathematically consistent and allows us to draw phenomenological predictions from it. Yet, there are widespread beliefs among physicists working in fundamental theory regarding some aspects of such a theory, once realized.
    [Show full text]
  • Ivan Agullo Department of Physics and Astronomy Louisiana State University [email protected] (Updated Jan 2016)
    Ivan Agullo Department of Physics and Astronomy Louisiana State University [email protected] (Updated Jan 2016) EMPLOYMENT • Louisiana State University Since Aug. 2013 Assistant Professor of Physics. • Cambridge University, DAMTP Aug. 2012 to Aug. 2013 Marie Curie Postdoctoral Fellow. Supervisor Prof. Paul Shellard. • Penn State University Oct. 2010 to Aug. 2012 Postdoctoral Fellow. Supervisor Prof. Abhay Ashtekar. • University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Apr. 2009 to Oct. 2010 Postdoctoral Fellow. Supervisor Prof. Leonard Parker. EDUCATION • PhD in Physics, University of Valencia, Spain July 2009 PhD advisor: Prof. Jose Navarro-Salas. PhD thesis title: Quantum black holes, inflationary cosmology, and the Planck scale. • Advanced Studies Diploma in Theoretical Physics July 2006 University of Valencia, Spain Master thesis title: Black holes, short distances and TeV gravity. • Degree in Physics, University of Valencia, Spain July 2004 HONORS AND AWARDS • First award in the Gravity Research Foundation essay competition 2017 For a paper entitled \Gravity and Handedness of Photons", written in collaboration with J. Navarro-Salas and A. del Rio. • Ousting Undergraduate Teaching Award 2017 Department of Physics and Astronomy, Louisiana State University. 1 • Young Scientist Award 2016, International Union of Pure and Apply Physics (IUPAP)-International Society of General Relativity and Gravitation \For his outstanding contributions to the physics of the early universe and possible observational consequences of quantum gravity." • CAREER Award, National Science Foundation, 2016 • Marie Curie European Postdoctoral Fellowship 2012 Project: Non-Gaussianity in the observable universe and the origin of cosmic inhomo- geneities. • Einstein-Galilei Award 2012 International award offered annually by the Institute for Theoretical and Advance Mathematics Einstein-Galilei, Italy.
    [Show full text]
  • Loop Quantum Gravity
    QUANTUM GRAVITY Loop gravity combines general relativity and quantum theory but it leaves no room for space as we know it – only networks of loops that turn space–time into spinfoam Loop quantum gravity Carlo Rovelli GENERAL relativity and quantum the- ture – as a sort of “stage” on which mat- ory have profoundly changed our view ter moves independently. This way of of the world. Furthermore, both theo- understanding space is not, however, as ries have been verified to extraordinary old as you might think; it was introduced accuracy in the last several decades. by Isaac Newton in the 17th century. Loop quantum gravity takes this novel Indeed, the dominant view of space that view of the world seriously,by incorpo- was held from the time of Aristotle to rating the notions of space and time that of Descartes was that there is no from general relativity directly into space without matter. Space was an quantum field theory. The theory that abstraction of the fact that some parts of results is radically different from con- matter can be in touch with others. ventional quantum field theory. Not Newton introduced the idea of physi- only does it provide a precise mathemat- cal space as an independent entity ical picture of quantum space and time, because he needed it for his dynamical but it also offers a solution to long-stand- theory. In order for his second law of ing problems such as the thermodynam- motion to make any sense, acceleration ics of black holes and the physics of the must make sense.
    [Show full text]
  • Matters of Gravity, the Newsletter of the Topical Group on Gravitation Of
    MATTERS OF GRAVITY The newsletter of the Topical Group on Gravitation of the American Physical Society Number 43 Winter 2014 Contents GGR News: we hear that ..., by David Garfinkle ..................... 4 100 years ago, by David Garfinkle ...................... 4 GGR program at the APS meeting in Savannah, GA, by David Garfinkle . 4 Conference reports: GR20/Amaldi10 Conference held at Warsaw, Poland, by Abhay Ashtekar . 7 School and workshop on quantum gravity in Brazil, by Jorge Pullin .... 10 arXiv:1402.2817v1 [gr-qc] 12 Feb 2014 1 Editor David Garfinkle Department of Physics Oakland University Rochester, MI 48309 Phone: (248) 370-3411 Internet: garfinkl-at-oakland.edu WWW: http://www.oakland.edu/?id=10223&sid=249#garfinkle Associate Editor Greg Comer Department of Physics and Center for Fluids at All Scales, St. Louis University, St. Louis, MO 63103 Phone: (314) 977-8432 Internet: comergl-at-slu.edu WWW: http://www.slu.edu/colleges/AS/physics/profs/comer.html ISSN: 1527-3431 DISCLAIMER: The opinions expressed in the articles of this newsletter represent the views of the authors and are not necessarily the views of APS. The articles in this newsletter are not peer reviewed. 2 Editorial The next newsletter is due September 1st. This and all subsequent issues will be available on the web at https://files.oakland.edu/users/garfinkl/web/mog/ All issues before number 28 are available at http://www.phys.lsu.edu/mog Any ideas for topics that should be covered by the newsletter, should be emailed to me, or Greg Comer, or the relevant correspondent. Any comments/questions/complaints about the newsletter should be emailed to me.
    [Show full text]