DOCSLIB.ORG

Is Ritual Slaughter Really Humane?

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Is Ritual Slaughter Really Humane? WellBeing International WBI Studies Repository 6-1974 (No. 28) -- Is Ritual Slaughter Really Humane? Humane Information Services, Inc. Follow this and additional works at: https://www.wellbeingintlstudiesrepository.org/rephum Recommended Citation Humane Information Services, Inc., "(No. 28) -- Is Ritual Slaughter Really Humane?" (1974). Report to Humanitarians. 20. https://www.wellbeingintlstudiesrepository.org/rephum/20 This material is brought to you for free and open access by WellBeing International. It has been accepted for inclusion by an authorized administrator of the WBI Studies Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. REPORT TO HUMANITARIANS Number 28 - June, 1974 published quarterly by 4521 - 4th Street South EDI TORS: J-/,,,-ue duf�'::!�" c£etviw St..Petersburg, Florida 33705 Frederick L. Thomsen, Ph.D. A NON-PROFIT NATI_ONAL HUMANE SOCIETY Miss Emily F. Gleockler FOR THE PREVENTION OF ANIMAL SUFFERING Dues and Contributions Tax Deductible . d\0humane problem is more important ter of the animal is kosher, because it is well-planned and executed project leading than the slaughter of food ani­ easier and less costly to devein that part to the development of such equipment and mals. This involves more potential suf­ of the carcass. This leaves the rear half methods has been under way at the Connec­ fering by more millions of animals than of the animal for consumption only by gen­ ticut Agricultural Experiment Station, un­ any other single treatment or mistreatment tiles. In addition, kosher inspectors re­ der the auspices of the Council. of animals. ject a relatively high percentage of the Some other humanitarians and humane or­ The.wisdom of our choices of alterna­ beef carcasses after slaughter, and this ganizations in this country, although they tive approaches to th;is probl1':111 and have never to our knowledge attempt­ the success achieved in implementing ed to scientifically refute claims the programs selected depends on that carotid section while the ani­ mal is conscious is itself humane, having adequate factual information - about this highly technical process. I S- R aI t U I I U g h t appear to believe that the only sat­ a . s a _ · -e r- For far too long we have been ac- isfactory approach to the problem of cepting the "conventional wisdom" in kosher slaughter is to repeal or our inadequate and frequently futile ? have declared unconstitutional the efforts to deal with slaughter prob- R- ea I I y H -umane . ritual slaughter exemption in the lems. This has led to differences' - i..-----·--------------------------....1 present state and federal humane among humane societies and humanitarians meat must be sold to the gentile trade. slaughter laws, and to pass laws in other about what should be done. This is a These conditions combined res!..llt in a states requiring that all animals be made field of humane work, above all others, volume of kosher slaughter much larger unconscious before shackling, hoisting and where we should stick together in meeting than otherwise would be required to satis­ cutting. That is a big order! the formidable array of opposition to fy the demand for 'kosher meat by the Jew­ If carotid section itself does produce slaughter improvement. But we can't do ish population. The humaneness of kosher substantial pain and suffering, ·regardless that unless we obtain and agree on the slaughter hence is a matter of rightful of how the animal is positioned for the facts. What is needed, above all else, is concern to�fles-as well asJews. "Re­ cut, the development of proper positioning more factual light on the subject. We ligious freedom" thatpermitsfollowers of equipment would not make kosher slaughter can't make intelligent decisions without one religion to observe its customs but humane. It will be better to find that adequate facts. denies those belonging to another the same out now than later, after more money has To many humanitarians, details about a_ privilege is not freedom, but tyranny. been spent on the assumption that carotid disagreeable subject like slaughtering For any Jew to say that gentiles have no section is painless. It would be putting methods are best swept under the rug. The right to question the humaneness of the the cart before the·horse to plan a pro­ average humanitarian is likely to say, method of-slaughtering the meat they are gram based entirely upon an untested as­ "Oh, I just can't bear to hear about such forced to buy is like a gentile saying the sumption. things." And that is a principal reason Jew should not be allowed to buy kosher If, on the other hand, examination of why so !!'Uch slaughter still is inhumane. meat. Sticklers for religious freedom the basic question provides reasonable as­ If we do not understand the problem, we cannot have their cake and eat it, too. surance that carotid section while · the an·­ will not take effective action to solve Humane Information Services is as free imal is conscious does not cause signifi­ it. It is not enough that a few officers of religious prejudices as it is practi­ cant pain, then any who have been holding of humane.societies understand; the indi­ cally possible to be, and there is no re­ back their support of the Council's pro­ vidual members also must understand if ligious purpose in offering this article. gram or advocating alternative approaches they are to make intelligent choices of We have leaned over backwards to present because of their doubts of this ba$ic as­ -9,l!:@.f:Il?t¾,Ye p,rog,raI!ls offered by the dif- the Jewish viewpoint of Shechita slaughter sumption, could get behind the Council's -- fe:rent societies •. in the words of. a Jewisii' authority. Any­ · p1-cgrwt: wiw:ehea:r.C: .::,2ily. _____, ;-·--- one who thinks he detects religious preju­ But there is still another reasod for RITUAL SLAUGHTER dice or anti-Semitism in this article is pursuing the point at this time. The so­ prejudiced himself. called humane methods of rendering the an­ The slaughtering of food animals to imal unconscious before shackling and· produce meat religiously acceptable for hoisting in many cases may be far from consumption by Jews and Muslims is by what ALTERNATIVE APPROACHES painless. Examination of the central is technically known as "carotid section",. In R�poltt to Human.,L:t,aJuano No. 27, is­ question of the humaneness of the carotid the severing of the carotid arteries. The sued in March of 1974, there appeared an section itself may throw much-needed light Jews call it Shechita, or Shehita. The article entitled "Pre-Slaughter Handling on these aspects of conventional "humane" revealed holy book of the Muslims, QWta.n, for Ritual Slaughter". In this article it slaughter. describes the process by two technical was shown that there are two alternative And, if the evidence supports the Jew­ terms, Zabah and Zokak {cutting and drain­ ways of approaching the problem of ritual ish claims that carotid section is pain­ ing the blood). It is Conrrnonly referred slaughter. The first is to assume that less, it might be that the positioning to as "ritual slaughter" and "kosher the ritual cut itself is painless, and equipment developed for use in connection slaughter". that the ensuing rapid loss of blood from with the ritual cut could also be suitable "Kosher" literally means "fit", .and ap­ the severed carotid arteries produces al­ for use for non-ritual slaughter in plants plies to any food including meat processed most instantaneous unconsciousness. This and states where ritual slaughter is im­ :i.n conformance with the Jewish dietary is the claim made by Jews and Muslims who portant, and hence facilitate the passage laws. have attempted to explain and justify of humane slaughter legislation in these The slaughter methods used by the Jews their method of slaughter. states. and Muslims are similar, although the Mus­ If this claim is correct� then the only {See RITUAL SLAUGHTER, page 2, column 1) lim method uses several cuts in severing problem involved in making ritual slaugh­ the vessels in the neck of the animal in­ ter humane is to invent and obtain the use stead.of the single clean cut under the of humane equipment for positioning the Jewish method•. Muslims in the United ,.::i animals for slaughter. At present, in ko­ lfl States are said to accept kosher meat. t,'I. Q) r,.. sher s1aughtering plants the animals are M t,'I .. I.O Although slaughter by Muslims is not im­ 0 Ill Ill shackled and hoisted while conscious, and .µ °'M portant in this country, in the world as a .µ Cl] ::I • the throats of the suspended animals then ·r-1 0 Q..Q 0 whole it is more commonly practiced than ll< - Cl] z are brought into position for the ritual 0 <C !-l Jewish slaughter. cut. This whole process of pre-slaughter !-l •O..QJ.iJ The term "humane slaughter" as ordinar­ Cl) .µ •r-1 handling or positioning for Shechita is s:: ily used implies that the animal has been 0 :::>. � � conducive of extreme pain and suffering. z • ll< rendered unconscious and insensitive to These inhumane pre-slaughter handling .µ pain before being shackled, hoisted and methods have no religions justification cut or stuck. But orthodox Jews and Mus­ whatever, but-are merely for convenience lims claim that their method, by which the and efficiency. Yet, as in the ritual u. throat is cut while the animal is con­ If) slaughter exemption contained in the fed­ Hz 0 scious, also is humane. r-- .µ eral Humane Slaughter Act, the whole pro­ ,. .C: M {I) C/l .µ M cess from beginning to end is included, 0.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Broiler Chickens
    The Life of: Broiler Chickens Chickens reared for meat are called broilers or broiler chickens. They originate from the jungle fowl of the Indian Subcontinent. The broiler industry has grown due to consumer demand for affordable poultry meat. Breeding for production traits and improved nutrition have been used to increase the weight of the breast muscle. Commercial broiler chickens are bred to be very fast growing in order to gain weight quickly. In their natural environment, chickens spend much of their time foraging for food. This means that they are highly motivated to perform species specific behaviours that are typical for chickens (natural behaviours), such as foraging, pecking, scratching and feather maintenance behaviours like preening and dust-bathing. Trees are used for perching at night to avoid predators. The life of chickens destined for meat production consists of two distinct phases. They are born in a hatchery and moved to a grow-out farm at 1 day-old. They remain here until they are heavy enough to be slaughtered. This document gives an overview of a typical broiler chicken’s life. The Hatchery The parent birds (breeder birds - see section at the end) used to produce meat chickens have their eggs removed and placed in an incubator. In the incubator, the eggs are kept under optimum atmosphere conditions and highly regulated temperatures. At 21 days, the chicks are ready to hatch, using their egg tooth to break out of their shell (in a natural situation, the mother would help with this). Chicks are precocial, meaning that immediately after hatching they are relatively mature and can walk around.
    [Show full text]
  • Backyard Farming and Slaughtering 2 Keeping Tradition Safe
    Backyard farming and slaughtering 2 Keeping tradition safe FOOD SAFETY TECHNICAL TOOLKIT FOR ASIA AND THE PACIFIC Backyard farming and slaughtering – Keeping tradition safe Backyard farming and slaughtering 2 Keeping tradition safe FOOD SAFETY TECHNICAL TOOLKIT FOR ASIA AND THE PACIFIC Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Bangkok, 2021 FAO. 2021. Backyard farming and slaughtering – Keeping tradition safe. Food safety technical toolkit for Asia and the Pacific No. 2. Bangkok. The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. © FAO, 2021 Some rights reserved. This work is made available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 IGO license (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/igo). Under the terms of this license, this work may be copied, redistributed and adapted for non- commercial purposes, provided that the work is appropriately cited. In any use of this work, there should be no suggestion that FAO endorses any specific organization, products or services. The use of the FAO logo is not permitted.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloads/Dec2018/Harpercollins, Oops
    oops 20 Life Lessons from the Fiascoes That Shaped America MARTIN J. SMITH and PATRICK J. KIGER To William Leford Smith,M.J.S whose. dimming eyes still see the humor in almost everything To Beastboy P.and J.K his. momster Good judgment is usually the result of experience. And experience is frequently the result of bad judgment. —An attorney in a lawsuit involving Boston’s John Hancock Tower, after the skyscraper’s windows fell out Some said I couldn’t sing, but no one could say I didn’t sing. —Florence Foster Jenkins, widely recognized as the worst opera diva ever contents Introduction The Joy of Oops ix Lesson #1 READ THE FINE PRINT The Eroto- Utopians of Upstate New York John Humphrey Noyes’s sexually adventurous Perfectionist commune was one of the most successful utopian religious groups in 19th-century Amer- ica. Alas, the devil was in the details. { 1 } Lesson #2 ACCENTUATE THE POSITIVE How Thomas Edison Invented Trash Talk Why would one of America’s iconic inventors publicly electrocute a full- grown carnival elephant? The answer reveals a little- known story of ego, failure, and the moment when America began “going negative.” { 13 } Lesson #3 BEWARE SOLUTIONS THAT CREATE NEW PROBLEMS The Global Underarm Deodorant Disaster Thomas Midgley Jr. was among America’s greatest problem solvers. Unfor- tunately, his landmark “Eureka!” moments had an echo that sounded a lot like “Oops!” { 27 } CONTENTS v Lesson #4 BAD RESULTS TRUMP GOOD INTENTIONS Kudzu: A Most Tangled Tale What began as a well- intentioned effort to stop soil erosion in the American South became a dramatic example of what can happen when you mess with Mother Nature.
    [Show full text]
  • War of the Currents
    An Electric Battle A WebQuest for War of the Currents Introduction At the turn of the twentieth century, the War of the Currents had a clear winner—Tesla and his alternating current. However, direct current survived into the twenty-first century. As recently as 2007, some parts of Manhattan were finally converted to alternating current. The transition from direct current to alternating current begin in the late 1920s but took decades, in part, because the foundation of New York City’s energy grid was build by Edison’s company. Task Your task is to research the everyday devices credited to Edison and Tesla. You will compare these inventor’s influences by creating a script for a 5-min mock “debate” between Edison and Tesla in which they debate their influences on today’s and future technology. Process Use the resources listed in the Resources section to begin your research. The Web sites listed are good starting points, but further Internet research will be necessary. Record your answers to the following questions. 1. What was the relationship between Tesla and Edison prior to the War of the Currents? 2. Both Tesla and Edison were prolific inventors. If the two were competing to obtain the most number of patents filed, who wins and by what margin? 3. Did any of Tesla’s or Edison’s inventions build upon one another or work together to bring about new technology? 4. Could direct current make a comeback? Explain your answer. Write a Script Write a script for a 5-min mock debate between Edison and Tesla, in which each tries to convince the audience that he was the more influential inventor.
    [Show full text]
  • Parashat Behar 5774 by Jacob Siegel May 10, 2014
    Parashat Behar 5774 By Jacob Siegel May 10, 2014 While the Israelites are still wandering in the desert, God instructs them in the laws of the shmita year, which will take effect once they enter the Promised Land. Once every seven years, instead of farming, they are to let the land lie fallow. The people of Israel will forage communally from the trees and the fields, eating the fruits that grow naturally in the land. The shmita year, we learn in Parashat Behar , parallels Shabbat—the seventh day of rest—on a grander scale: a year of rest for the land, once every seven years. In the midst of the section describing the shmita year comes a strangely-worded verse that puzzled the rabbis with their deeply sensitive literary ears: “There shall be a Sabbath of the land for you to eat from.” 1 The verse inspires a number of questions. For example, what does it mean that the Sabbath is "to eat from"? One of the most perplexing parts of the verse is the seemingly unnecessary phrase "for you." Why not just say that there should be a Sabbath of the land? This question is answered by the 19th-century Lithuanian rabbi the Netziv. He writes that “for you” is the Torah’s clever way of saying “equally.” In most structures of Jewish communal life 3,000 years ago, the owner of a piece of property had the first claim on any food grown on that property. Even when slaves and servants needed to be fed, they came second to the owner’s needs.
    [Show full text]
  • War of Currents
    War of Currents In the War of Currents era (sometimes, War of the Currents or Battle of Currents) in the late 1880s, George Westinghouse and Thomas Edison became adversaries due to Edison's promotion of direct current (DC) for electric power distribution over alternating current (AC). Edison's direct-current system generated and distributed electric power at the same voltage as used by the customer's lamps and motors. This meant that the current in transmission was relatively large, and so heavy conductors were required and transmission distances were limited, to about a mile (kilometre); otherwise transmission losses would make the system uneconomical. At the time, no method was practical for changing voltages of DC power. The invention of an efficient transformer allowed high voltage to be used for AC transmission. An AC generating plant could then serve customers at a great distance (tens to hundreds of miles), or could serve more customers within its economical transmission distance. The fewer much larger plants needed for AC would achieve an economy of scale that would lower costs further. The invention of a practical AC motor increased the usefulness of alternating current for powering machinery. Edison's company had invested heavily in DC technology and was vigorously defending its DC based patents. George Westinghouse saw AC as a way to get into the business with his own patented competing system and set up the Westinghouse Electric Company to design and build it. The Westinghouse company also purchased the patents for alternating current devices from inventors in Europe and licensed patents from Nikola Tesla.
    [Show full text]
  • Humane Treatment of Farm Animals: Overview and Issues
    Humane Treatment of Farm Animals: Overview and Issues Tadlock Cowan Analyst in Natural Resources and Rural Development May 9, 2011 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov RS21978 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Humane Treatment of Farm Animals: Overview and Issues Summary Animal welfare supporters in the United States have long sought legislation to modify or curtail some practices considered by U.S. agriculture to be acceptable or even necessary to animal health. Members of Congress over the years have offered various bills that would affect animal care on the farm, during transport, or at slaughter; several proposals were introduced in the 111th Congress, although no further action was taken on the bills. No bills have been introduced in the 112th Congress. Members of the House and Senate Agriculture Committees generally have expressed a preference for voluntary rather than regulatory approaches to humane care. Meanwhile, animal welfare supporters have won initiatives in several states to impose some care requirements on animal producers. Congressional Research Service Humane Treatment of Farm Animals: Overview and Issues Contents Background ................................................................................................................................1 Criticisms of Animal Agriculture Practices............................................................................1 Defense of Animal Agriculture Practices ...............................................................................2
    [Show full text]
  • Five Freedoms and the International Fur Trade
    FIVE FREEDOMS AND THE INTERNATIONAL FUR TRADE A critical analysis of conditions filmed on two certified “high welfare” Finnish fur farms, reviewed against the Five Freedoms of animal welfare Dr Sandra Baker, Research Fellow, Oxford University | Professor Marc Bekoff, Professor Emeritus of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Colorado | Dr Andy Butterworth, Reader in Animal Science and Policy, Bristol University | Professor Stephen Harris Professor Alastair MacMillan | Dr Alick Simmons, former UK Government Deputy Chief Veterinary Officer The Five Freedoms are a scientifically underpinned framework developed to promote the CONCLUSION: humane treatment of animals under human control. Established in the United Kingdom forty years ago, they are now universally recognised and have been adopted and adapted across There is no doubt that there is clear evidence from this footage, of supposedly 'high welfare' certified the world for animals kept in a wide range of circumstances. Indeed, the pre-eminent World farms, that none of the Five Freedoms are being Organisation for Animal Health (OIE) has adopted them as their guiding principles on animal met. By implication therefore, the conditions are welfare, and they are now codified as welfare needs in UK and EU legislation. highly likely to contravene the guiding principles of the OIE, the European Directive 98/58/EC Concerning the Protection of Animals Kept for Farming Purposes, as well as the Council of Europe’s 1999 However, it should be realised that as science and understanding of animals and their welfare needs have will undoubtedly cause a number of secondary Recommendations Concerning Fur Animals. developed, the Five Freedoms are now very much seen as the most basic obligations of those who keep animals.
    [Show full text]
  • Statement Concerning the Finnish Governments’ Proposal for New Legislation on Animal Wellbeing
    STATEMENT CONCERNING THE FINNISH GOVERNMENTS’ PROPOSAL FOR NEW LEGISLATION ON ANIMAL WELLBEING Helsinki, 27.2.2018 - The Finnish government is proposing new legislation on animal wellbeing, which would replace the current law on Animal Protection. In the suggested legislation bleeding of an animal could only be started once the animal has been appropriately stunned or killed with a method suitable for the species in question. The new legislation would require so-called pre-cut stunning. The current law on Animal Protection allows starting of the bleeding of the animal simultaneously with its stunning. Under the new law, the animal would always have to be stunned prior to slaughtering it. Slaughter according to Jewish practice (shechita) and the commandments concerning purity of food (kashrut) are absolutely central in Judaism and religiously binding for Jews. There are many commandments on proper humane treatment of animals in Judaism; the aim of shechita is to produce the minimal amount of suffering and pain to an animal during slaughter. Thus, the harming of an animal by stunning it prior to bleeding, is absolutely forbidden in Judaism. Shechita has been shown in numerous studies, to be at least as swift and painless a slaughtering method as e.g. bolt pistol stunning conjoined with bloodletting. (See. S. D. Rosen: Physiological insights into Shechita, The Veterinary Record, June 12, 2004). Because stunning methods such as bolt pistols destroy part of the animal’s brain, using such a method can in no way be considered humane and is at odds with the principle of keeping the animal uninjured. There is also no clear evidence that bolt pistol stunning would be less painful than the fast and efficient method used in Judaism.
    [Show full text]
  • Cutting Through the Confusion About Shechita By: Rabbi Jeremy Rosen
    Cutting through the Confusion about Shechita by: Rabbi Jeremy Rosen Although it has been several weeks since the gruesome videos taken inside the AgriProcessors abattoir were released, the controversy continues. The videos were taken surreptitiously by a PETA volunteer employed at the plant, and can be viewed at PETA’s website. While PETA clearly has it’s own agenda, no one has denied that the scenes on the videos are real. They show animals, after shechita has taken place, having their trachea and esophagus pulled out of the neck, being ejected from the holding pens while still conscious, and, in at least one case, actually getting up and wandering around. Although these scenes are sickening, I have to say that no way of killing animals is pleasant. Nowadays we like to sanitize the process and put the reality out of our minds. But I grew up in the English countryside and often saw the way animals were barbarically butchered out in the paddock, behind the barn, or in the butcher’s yard. The butcher would simply stick a knife in and wrench, or take a hatchet and hack away to a blood-curdling cacophony of squeals and protests. In contrast, shechita, the halachic method of putting an animal to death for food, is designed to be as painless as possible. The knife used to sever the main arteries in the neck is kept razor-sharp, and the slightest imperfection makes it forbidden to use. We know that a cut to our own flesh from such a sharp blade cannot be felt initially.
    [Show full text]
  • Religious and Non-Religious Slaughter
    Religious and Non-Religious Slaughter Joe M. Regenstein Professor of Food Science Head: Cornell Kosher and Halal Food Initiative Cornell University Ithaca, NY 14853-7201, USA [email protected] American Meat Institute Animal Welfare Conference March 26, 2010 Kansas City, MO Dialog on Religious Slaughter A European Union project of the Health and Consumer Policy Commission The Importance of Religious Slaughter Obtaining meat by means of religious slaughter is an integral part of being an observant Jew or Muslim for many practitioners of these religions. Although some Jews and Muslims may opt for a vegetarian diet, and some are observant of food laws to varying degrees, major religious events and many other meals often center around a meal involving meat. The loss of the right to slaughter meat is viewed as a direct attack on the religion –as highlighted by Nazi Germany’s first restrictions on Jews being the prohibition of religious slaughter. Responsibilities The scientific/engineering community needs to work together with the Jewish and Muslim Communities to make sure that the animal welfare during religious slaughter is done in the best possible way consistent with religious requirements as determined by the local religious leadership. Religious diversity both within a religious community and of other religious communities deserves to be respected as their needs are protected by the European Union. The religious community needs to organize themselves and then take on responsibility for assuring the best possible religious slaughter procedures are used. The Bottom Line 1. The animal welfare of religious slaughter needs to be improved consistent with and respectful of all religious rules.
    [Show full text]
  • What to Expect If You Report Suspected Animal Abuse Or Neglect
    What to Expect If You Report Suspected Animal Abuse or Neglect Demystifying the Legal Process Nothing in this material is meant to provide legal advice but rather to provide general information on this subject. Presenters: Lorna Grande, DVM Sherry Ramsey, Esq. Moderator: Barry Kellogg, VMD - Moderator About the Humane Society Veterinary Medical Association • National veterinary medical association, founded in 2008 • Focus: Animal health & welfare • Affiliate of The Humane Society of the United States PART I: The Veterinary Perspective Presented by Dr. Lorna Grande Goal of this Conversation • Objective is to introduce and discuss the idea that it is important for veterinarians and staff to become comfortable with recognizing and, when appropriate, reporting animal abuse and neglect to the proper authorities. • Signs of animal abuse and neglect will be mentioned What Not to Expect Tonight! • This is not a forensics program! • There are many places online and at CE conferences where you can gain detailed, specific forensics training. We encourage you to do so if it interests you. Resources: Training/CE • University of Florida ASPCA Veterinary Forensics Online Graduate Certificate: forensicscience.ufl.edu/veterinary o Ask your local VMA to have a humane officer or shelter veterinarian speak to your group about recognizing and reporting animal cruelty • VIN o The Veterinarian’s Role in Handling Animal Abuse Cases (2005 and 2007 Continuing Education Archives) Humane Society Veterinary Medical Association - hsvma.org | Humane Society University - humanesocietyuniversity.org Page 1 of 17 Who Are the Proper Authorities? • Varies from state to state and even county to county. • You should identify who in your region investigates animal cruelty cases.
    [Show full text]