DOCSLIB.ORG

Request for Proposals Orange Township Zoning Resolution Review and Update

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Request for Proposals Orange Township Zoning Resolution Review and Update Trustee Ben Grumbles Trustee Debbie Taranto Trustee Ryan Rivers Chair Zoning Department Michele Boni, Development and Zoning Director Request for Proposals Orange Township Zoning Resolution Review and Update 1. Important Note Offers are advised to read, understand, and become familiar with the instructions, requirements, and specifications set forth in this Request for Proposals (“RFP”). By submitting a proposal, offerors will be presumed to be familiar with all the instructions, requirements, and specifications set forth in this RFP. 2. Introduction The Zoning Commission for Orange Township, Delaware County, Ohio (“Commission”) is currently accepting proposals from qualified planning and zoning consultants (“Consultant”) to conduct a comprehensive review and update of the Orange Township Zoning Resolution (“Resolution”) and Orange Township Zoning Map (“Zoning Map”). The address of the Commission is as follows: Orange Zoning Commission Orange Township Hall 1680 E. Orange Rd. Lewis Center, Ohio 43035 3. Orange Township A. Community Profile Orange Township, Delaware County, Ohio (“Township”) is an urban township consisting of over 30,000 people. It is located just north of Columbus, Ohio. Given its close proximity to Columbus, and the amenities and quality of life available, the Township is a desired community in which to live and work, as evidenced by its unbroken continued growth since the 1990’s. Although its use mix is predominantly residential, it also includes a diverse mix of commercial and industrial uses within its limits. The major retail corridors are US Rte. 23 (a.k.a. Columbus Pike) and S.R. 750 (a.k.a. E. Powell Road). B. Commission The Commission was established by R.C. § 519.04 and consists of five (5) regular members. The Commission also has two (2) alternate members, who may serve on the Commission in place of an absent regular member. The Commission is charged with carrying out those duties assigned to it by the Ohio Revised Code. Pursuant to R.C. § 519.12, these duties include initiating, holding hearings on, and making recommendations to the Orange Township Board of Trustees (“Board”) on amendments to the Resolution. To assist it in its duties, the Commission has the authority, within the limits of the moneys appropriated by the Board, to contract with planning consultants. R.C. § 519.05. The current Resolution review and update project (“Project”) falls within these duties and this authority of the Commission. C. Township Zoning Staff The Orange Township Planning and Zoning Department (“Zoning Department”) consists of three (3) full-time and two (2) part-time staff members (“Zoning Staff”). The Department’s Development and Zoning Director will serve as the Project Manager and point of contact for this Project. Members of the Zoning Staff, Commission, and Orange Township Board of Zoning Appeals (“BZA”) will play significant roles in the process. Final approval and adoption of any resulting changes to the Resolution and zoning map will be determined pursuant to the process mandated in Ohio Revised Code (“R.C.”) Section 519.12. 4. Zoning and Planning Documents A. Current Zoning Resolution Zoning was initially adopted in Orange Township in 1955. The current Resolution consists of thirty (30) articles containing definitions, twelve (12) zoning districts, general development standards, sign and billboard standards, and zoning board and zoning official regulations and procedures. The current zoning districts are a mix of planned and Euclidean districts. A copy of the current Resolution can be found on the Township website at: http://www.orangetwp.org/index.aspx?NID=190. Text amendments are made to the Resolution on almost an annual basis. The most recent text amendment to the Resolution occurred in 2020 with the implementation of the Route 23 Corridor Overlay District (RCOD). Prior text amendments to the Resolution have included expansion of the prior nominal “Definitions” section, bifurcation of the prior Planned Residential District into separate single-family and multi-family planned districts, addressing the regulation of adult uses, creation of a new planned district directed to senior housing, adoption of lighting standards, the permitting of previously prohibited temporary uses, RFP - Resolution Review and Update Page 2 of 28 delegation of landscaping and architectural review responsibility to the Zoning Inspector, as well as the periodic update of various items in response to perceived issues, changes in the law, and clerical issues. While many changes have been made to the Resolution over the years, there has not been a major rewrite of the Resolution in decades. The current Project is anticipated to entail a major re-write to insert or address needed, desired, or missing items and correct errors and oversights that may exist. B. “Planning Orange” – 2018 Comprehensive Land Use Plan The Township recently adopted the 2018 Comprehensive Land Use Plan known as “Planning Orange.” The plan focuses on land use and is intended to be a guide and provide a policy basis for amendments and updates to the Resolution. The plan includes the following recommendations: • Potential Zoning Changes for Future Discussion (Appendix B.4) • Creation of street design guidelines to help incentivize development that promotes active transportation (walking, biking, etc.). • Consider new processes to reduce obstacles facing developers seeking to build in Orange Township • Encourages Orange Township to have a new branding initiative. This is currently in process. However, it will require amendments to the signage code. Additional recommendations are included in Planning Orange. A copy of Planning Orange can be found on the Township website at: https://www.orangetwp.org/DocumentCenter/View/2778/Land-Use-Plan 12318?ProposalId C. Zoning Diagnostics Report To identify issues with the current Resolution, the Commission recent had an independent third party perform an analysis of the Resolution. This resulted in a Zoning Diagnostics Report (“Diagnostics Report”). A copy of the Diagnostics Report, including identified deficiencies with the current Resolution, is electronically available upon request. To receive a copy, send an email to Michele Boni, Township Development and Zoning Director at: [email protected]. 5. Scope of Work The selected Consultant will conduct a comprehensive review and update of the Resolution and Zoning Map. The final scope of work shall be determined jointly by the Consultant, Zoning Staff, Commission, and BZA, but at a minimum shall include performance of the following: RFP - Resolution Review and Update Page 3 of 28 A. Collaboration • The Consultant shall receive input from and work collaboratively on this project with members of the Zoning Staff, Commission, and BZA. • The Consultant shall be responsible to all date and fact gathering for the project. • The Consultant shall be responsible for drafting all updates to the Resolution and Zoning Map. • Discussion of current difficulties experienced by the Zoning Staff, Commission, and BZA. • B. Review • Review a) the Resolution, b) the Diagnostics Report, and c) Planning Orange. The Consultant will work closely with Zoning Staff to produce an analysis of the current Resolution, taking into account the goals, objectives and recommendations in Planning Orange (i.e. 2018 Comprehensive Land Use Plan) to ensure consideration of that plan in the analysis of the current Resolution. C. Considerations • Consideration of updates to all articles and sections of the Resolution. • Exploration, within legal limits, of new practices and/or processes to reduce obstacles facing developers seeking to build in the Township. • Consideration of appropriate responses to the Township’s current branding initiative. This will likely involve consideration of changes to the signage code and other zoning standards. • Consideration of amendment of the signage standards in a manner calculated to comply with Reed vs. Gilbert, 135 S. Ct. 2218 (2015). • Consideration of further expansion of the “Definitions” section of the Resolution. • Consideration of land uses additional to those currently permitted. • Consideration of the “Potential Zoning Changes for Future Discussion” contained in Appendix B.4 of Planning Orange. • Consideration of the creation of a new mixed use planned district. This district would allow for a “new urbanism” style development intended to provide a sense of place and a gathering spot for the community. • Consideration of amendment of existing planned residential districts to accommodate empty-nester/condo proposals. • Consideration of amendment of the Farm Residential District (FR-1) to provide specific standards for Old Lewis Center/Lewis Center Village. • Consideration of other overlay districts, similar to the new Route 23 Corridor Overlay District (RCOD). The intent of this type of district is to encourage a mix of uses with consistent development standards and a streamlined review process. • Consideration of amendment of the General Development Standards (Article XXI). • Consideration of removing zoning districts that no longer apply or are no longer needed. • Consideration of incorporating the new, but now separate, Route 23 Corridor Overlay District (RCOD) in to the body of the updated Resolution. RFP - Resolution Review and Update Page 4 of 28 • Consideration of any and all other amendments that may benefit the Township. D. Work • Prepare, draft, and present an analysis of the current Resolution. The analysis shall be based on the Consultant’s reviews of
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Tobacco Use Patterns in Tuberculosis Patients with High Rates of Human
    Louwagie and Ayo-Yusuf BMC Public Health 2013, 13:1031 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/13/1031 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Tobacco use patterns in tuberculosis patients with high rates of human immunodeficiency virus co-infection in South Africa Goedele MC Louwagie1* and Olalekan A Ayo-Yusuf1,2 Abstract Background: Tuberculosis (TB) patients who smoke tobacco are at an increased risk for adverse TB treatment outcomes. This study describes tobacco use patterns among newly diagnosed TB patients, their readiness to quit, and their beliefs about tobacco-related health effects in a high HIV-burden setting in South Africa. Socio-economic and demographic factors associated with smoking were also determined. Methods: This was a cross-sectional analysis of baseline data collected for a smoking cessation study at six large tuberculosis clinics in a South African township (N = 1926). We collected information on current and past tobacco use, socio-economic and demographic status, beliefs regarding the harmful effects of smoking and quit behaviour, and motivation, using structured interviewer-administered questionnaires. TB- and HIV-related information was obtained from patient records. Data analysis entailed descriptive statistics, followed by multivariate logistic regression with backward elimination, adjusted for clustering by facility. Results: Just over one fifth of respondents (21.8%, 420/1924) reported currently smoking tobacco (males 37.6%, females 4.6%). By contrast, only 1.8% (35/1918) of all respondents reported being past smokers. Of the current smokers, about half (51.8%, 211/407) had previously attempted to quit, mainly for health reasons. The majority of respondents (89.3%, 1675/1875) believed tobacco smoking was harmful for their health and smokers were highly motivated to quit (median score 9, interquartile range 7–10).
    [Show full text]
  • The Effects of Primary Care Chronic-Disease Management in Rural China
    NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES THE EFFECTS OF PRIMARY CARE CHRONIC-DISEASE MANAGEMENT IN RURAL CHINA Yiwei Chen Hui Ding Min Yu Jieming Zhong Ruying Hu Xiangyu Chen Chunmei Wang Kaixu Xie Karen Eggleston Working Paper 26100 http://www.nber.org/papers/w26100 NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138 July 2019 This research was made possible by the Tongxiang CDC and local government, which provided data instrumental to this research. The authors would also like to express gratitude to the Stanford University Freeman Spogli Institute for International Studies (FSI) Policy Implementation Lab and a Shorenstein Asia Pacific Research Center faculty research award for funding this project. Yiwei Chen gratefully acknowledges funding from the Asia-Pacific Scholars program of FSI, Stanford University. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bureau of Economic Research. NBER working papers are circulated for discussion and comment purposes. They have not been peer-reviewed or been subject to the review by the NBER Board of Directors that accompanies official NBER publications. © 2019 by Yiwei Chen, Hui Ding, Min Yu, Jieming Zhong, Ruying Hu, Xiangyu Chen, Chunmei Wang, Kaixu Xie, and Karen Eggleston. All rights reserved. Short sections of text, not to exceed two paragraphs, may be quoted without explicit permission provided that full credit, including © notice, is given to the source. The Effects of Primary Care Chronic-Disease Management in Rural China Yiwei Chen, Hui Ding, Min Yu, Jieming Zhong, Ruying Hu, Xiangyu Chen, Chunmei Wang, Kaixu Xie, and Karen Eggleston NBER Working Paper No.
    [Show full text]
  • The Chinese State in Ming Society
    The Chinese State in Ming Society The Ming dynasty (1368–1644), a period of commercial expansion and cultural innovation, fashioned the relationship between the present-day state and society in China. In this unique collection of reworked and illustrated essays, one of the leading scholars of Chinese history re-examines this relationship and argues that, contrary to previous scholarship, which emphasized the heavy hand of the state, it was radical responses within society to changes in commercial relations and social networks that led to a stable but dynamic “constitution” during the Ming dynasty. This imaginative reconsideration of existing scholarship also includes two essays first published here and a substantial introduction, and will be fascinating reading for scholars and students interested in China’s development. Timothy Book is Principal of St. John’s College, University of British Colombia. Critical Asian Scholarship Edited by Mark Selden, Binghamton and Cornell Universities, USA The series is intended to showcase the most important individual contributions to scholarship in Asian Studies. Each of the volumes presents a leading Asian scholar addressing themes that are central to his or her most significant and lasting contribution to Asian studies. The series is committed to the rich variety of research and writing on Asia, and is not restricted to any particular discipline, theoretical approach or geographical expertise. Southeast Asia A testament George McT.Kahin Women and the Family in Chinese History Patricia Buckley Ebrey
    [Show full text]
  • Towards a General Theory of Environmental Inequality: Social Characteristics of Townships and the Distribution of Pollution in China’S Jiangsu Province
    Towards a General Theory of Environmental Inequality: Social Characteristics of Townships and the Distribution of Pollution in China’s Jiangsu Province Ethan D. Schoolmana* and Chunbo Mab aDepartment of Sociology, University of Michigan, 500 S. State St., Rm. 3001, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA. Email: [email protected] bSchool of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Centre for Environmental Economics and Policy, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia. Email: [email protected] *Corresponding author: Tel 001-518-257-0471; Fax 001-734-763-6887 07 November 2011 Working Paper 1123 School of Agricultural and Resource Economics http://www.are.uwa.edu.au Citation: Schoolman, Ethan D. and Chunbo Ma. (2011) Towards a General Theory of Environmental Inequality: Social Characteristics of Townships and the Distribution of Pollution in China’s Jiangsu Province, Working Paper 1123, School of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Australia. © Copyright remains with the authors of this document. Towards a General Theory of Environmental Inequality: Social Characteristics of Townships and the Distribution of Pollution in China’s Jiangsu Province Key Words: Environmental Inequality, Hukou System, Pollution, China JEL: D63, J15, J61, Q53, R12, R23 1. Introduction Social scientists have explored the distribution of pollution and pollution-based health risk in the U.S. for nearly three decades. Consensus on whether environmental inequality exists in the U.S., and if so why, has evaded researchers for much of this time, and the scientific merit of early work in particular has been called into question (Bowen 2002). In recent years, however, data and methods of analysis have diversified and improved, in ways that we review below, and the findings of researchers have begun to converge.
    [Show full text]
  • Charter Township of Bangor Master Plan Bay County, Michigan
    Charter Township of Bangor Master Plan Bay County, Michigan January, 2002 Charter Township of Bangor Bay County, Michigan Master Plan Charter Township of Bangor Planning Commission Prepared with the assistance of: 235 East Main Street Northville, Michigan 48167 Telephone: (248) 596-0920 Facsimile: (248) 596-0930 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Township Board of Trustees Jeff Mayes, Supervisor Janet Santos, Clerk Donna Leitermann, Treasurer Connie Beson, Trustee Howard Eagle, Trustee Richard Stasik, Trustee John Howard, Trustee Township Planning Commission David Lange Bill Schubert, Chairperson Ed Davis Patricia Parker Dennis Pilarski Henry Schumann, Vice-Chairperson Richard Stasik Mark Norton Township Administration/Officials Barbara Potts, Planning Commission Coordinator Dave DeGrow, Building Inspector Jim Bellor, Fire Marshal Planning Consultant McKenna Associates, Incorporated Charter Township of Bangor McKenna Associates, Inc. Master Plant i January, 2002 TABLE OF CONTENTS Title Page Resolution of Adoption Acknowledgments............................................................................................................................ i Table of Contents ............................................................................................................................ ii List of Tables ................................................................................................................................. iv List of Maps ..................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Business Improvement District/Principal Shopping District/Business Improvement Zone (Bid/Psd/Biz)
    BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT/PRINCIPAL SHOPPING DISTRICT/BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT ZONE (BID/PSD/BIZ) Through the provisions of Public Act 120 of 1961, cities, development of a PSD. The board of a PSD shall be appointed villages, and urban townships may create a Business by the chief executive officer of the local governmental unit Improvement District (BID) or a Principal Shopping District with the concurrence of the legislative body of the local (PSD) to promote economic development within a defined governmental unit. One member of the board shall be from the area of the municipality. A BID/PSD allows a municipality to adjacent residential area, one member shall be a representative collect revenues, levy special assessments and issue bonds in of the local governmental unit, and a majority of the members order to address the maintenance, security and operation of shall be nominees of individual businesses located within that district. A provision under Chapter 2 of the act allows a the PSD. If the boundaries of a PSD are the same as those Business Improvement Zone (BIZ) to be created by private of a Downtown Development Authority (PA 197 of 1975), property owners of those parcels in a zone plan within a city or the governing body may designate that the DDA board shall village. A BIZ may levy special assessments to finance activities compose the PSD board as well. and projects outlined within a zone plan for a period of ten (10) years. One or more BIZs may be created by business owners within a city or village, whereby the business owners petition the city Note: This document is offered as a general guide only and the or village clerk to create the boundaries of the proposed zone.
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1 of 2 Hb4197/0304 EXPAND —URBAN TOWNSHIP
    EXPAND “URBAN TOWNSHIP” DEFINITION H.B. 4197 (H-2): COMMITTEE SUMMARY House Bill 4197 (Substitute H-2 as passed by the House) Sponsor: Representative Chris Ward House Committee: Local Government and Urban Policy Senate Committee: Commerce and Labor Date Completed: 5-27-03 CONTENT The bill would amend the Local Development Financing Act to expand the definition of “urban township” (which is a type of municipality eligible to establish a local development finance authority under the Act). To qualify under the expanded definition, a township would have to meet all of the following requirements: -- Have a population of at least 13,000. -- Be located in a county that had a population of at least 150,000. -- Have adopted a master zoning plan before February 1, 1987. Currently, “urban township” means a township that meets one or more of the following: -- Has a population of at least 20,000, or has a population of at least 10,000 and is located in a county that has a population of at least 400,000; adopted a master zoning plan before February 1, 1987; and provides sewer, water, and other public services to all or a part of the township. -- Has a population under 20,000; is located in a county that has a population of at least 250,000 but less than 400,000, and that is located in a metropolitan statistical area; has within its boundaries a parcel of property under common ownership that is 800 acres or larger and is capable of being served by a railroad, and is located within three miles of a limited access highway; and established a local development finance authority before December 31, 1998.
    [Show full text]
  • 2002 Local Impact Statement Report
    2002 Local Impact Statement Report Bills Passed in 2002 That Became Law Townships COUNTIESCOUNTIESCOUNTIES VILLAGES CITIES SCHOOL DISTRICTS Ohio Legislative Service Commission September, 2003 Table of Contents Introduction Introduction------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------i Local Government Association Comments ---------------------------------------------------------iv Comments from County Commissioners Association of Ohio-------------------------------------------v Comments from the Ohio Municipal League------------------------------------------------------------vi Comments from Ohio School Boards Association------------------------------------------------------vii Comments from Ohio Township Association-----------------------------------------------------------viii Part I: Summary and Analysis Summary and Analysis ------------------------------------------------------------------------------2 Bills with Local Impact “As Introduced” or “As Enacted” ----------------------------------------6 Bills with Altered Local Impact ---------------------------------------------------------------------9 Local Impact by Political Subdivision---------------------------------------------------------------27 Part II: Local Impact Statements Presentation of 2002 Fiscal Notes and Local Impact Statements------------------------------------34 (Includes the page number of each bill’s Local Impact Statement) Appendix All House Bills Passed in 2002 that Became Law ------------------------------------------------------160
    [Show full text]
  • A Historical Analysis of Transparency and Campaign Finance Law in Taiwan (1935-2004)
    Article Follow the Money: The Buck Stops Where?: A Historical Analysis of Transparency and Campaign Finance Law in Taiwan (1935-2004) Po Liang Chen* ABSTRACT The Taiwanese legislature enacted the Political Donation Act 2004 (PDA), adopting U.S. and Japanese campaign finance law models. Nonetheless, the legislative efforts seemed slight. This paper argues it is because the Taiwanese legislature of 2004 underestimated two main factors of the campaign finance market: the value of transparency and the pre-existing electoral clientelism. This paper adopts a historical institutionalism approach to analyze the evolution of electoral clientelism and its interaction with campaign finance law before the enactment of PDA in four eras: the Japanese colonial rule era (1935-1945), the transition from the Japanese colonial rule era to the ROC era (1945-1949), the authoritarian era (1949-1991), and the democratic era (1991-2004). From 1895, Japan established a colonial regime in Taiwan. The Government-General of Taiwan (GGT) held elections in 1935. In order to control the electoral outcome, the GGT enacted strict election laws and lenient campaign finance rules, and enforced them arbitrarily to form a coalition leaning to the GGT via exchange of interests. As a result, the GGT controlled DOI：10.3966/181263242019031401003 * Post-Doctoral Researcher in Academia Sinica, Institutum Jurisprudentiae. Ph. D in Law, University of Washington, USA. The author is grateful to the anonymous reviewers and editors for their inspiring and constructive suggestions to improve this article. All errors and omissions remain the responsibility of the author. 1 2 National Taiwan University Law Review [Vol. 14: 1 the majority.
    [Show full text]
  • Residential Building Stock Modelling for Mainland China” by Danhua Xin Et Al
    Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-2019-385-RC1, 2020 © Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Interactive comment on “Residential building stock modelling for mainland China” by Danhua Xin et al. Anonymous Referee #1 Received and published: 12 June 2020 To whom it may concern, I greatly appreciate the authors’ efforts to address the issue of “grid-scale building stock modeling”, which is very helpful for the understanding of spatial distributions of seismic risk and beyond. However, I feel the manuscript contains some major problems, ren- dering it inappropriate for publication at the current version. Normally, a manuscript in the state and quality like this one should be rejected. But, I feel the overall modeling idea and process presented in the manuscript is generally reasonable and acceptable, and part of the problems might be due to language usages or writing experience. Thus, I think the paper has the potential and the possibility to be a valuable contribution to the disaster research community if it undergoes a very careful and intensive revision process. I am therefore still willing to suggest the Journal rating it as major revision. C1 I strongly recommend the authors making a most careful, detailed, and thorough re- vision to make sure the manuscript’s scientific soundness and expression readability. Below, please see my general and detailed comments: General comments: 1) Some key elements in the modeling process (including validation section) haven’t been clearly explained or presented, making readers have to guess (some of them I can figure out, others not) what they are specifically, how they are produced, and why using them is reasonable, such as F2, F3, 9 equations and others in the modeling process, and UCC, “1.32” in the validation section.
    [Show full text]
  • Urban History of Kansas
    Review Essay Series URBAN HISTORY OF KANSAS William S. Worley t is most difficult to assess the urban histo- EDITORS’INTRODUCTION ry of a state that has very carefully avoid- It seems odd that so few Kansans ed identification as “urban” throughout its recognize the crucial role urban entire history. Whether one thinks of the places have played in our history. Icowboys, the cattle trails and Abilene or Dodge One of the most famous Kansans, William Allen White, was a town man City; or of Dorothy and the Wizard of Oz; or who castigated the rural Populists for even fields of wheat and sunflowers waving in driving the lifeblood of towns and the breeze, almost all public images of Kansas cities, capital, out of the state. At the same time that we memorialize are rural and agricultural. Even the current state White, we forget that towns and cities slogan, “Kansas—As Big as You Think,” em- represent the developmental aspect of phasizes the wide-open spaces. Kansas history. They were places of The most recent full-length interpretation of trade and processing that from the be- ginning tied Kansas to the national Kansas state history by Craig Miner provides market and beyond. They brought in excellent coverage of the territorial years, the capital, linked urban and rural life, building of the agricultural base, the political vi- and offered Kansans the opportunity cissitudes of this normally most Republican of to develop music, art, and literature that could feed off the concentrated states and insights into the personalities who and diverse populations of urban life.
    [Show full text]
  • Principal Shopping Districts (PSD) Business Improvement Districts (BID) Business Improvement Zone (BIZ)
    Principal Shopping Districts (PSD) Business Improvement Districts (BID) Business Improvement Zone (BIZ) P.A. 120 of 1961 Michelle Aude+e-Bauman Michigan Main Street, Community Development T: 517.388.4829 E: [email protected] Agenda • Overview & Purpose of Districts • PSD’s & BID’s • Eligibility & Establishment • Implementation & Funding • BIZ’s • Eligibility & Establishment • Implementation & Financing Principal Shopping Districts (PSD) Business Improvement Districts (BID) Business Improvement Zone (BIZ) : PA 120 of 1961 Overview & Purpose • Defined district/zone in need of special services • Opportunity for shared marketing, management, operations, maintenance, development • Leverage resources to increase impact and drive economic development • Provide targeted services, projects, activities to benefit property owners and businesses within the district/zone • Generate revenue to fund special services Principal Shopping Districts (PSD) Business Improvement Districts (BID) Business Improvement Zone (BIZ) : PA 120 of 1961 PSD’s and BID’s: Who is eligible? Any “Local governmental unit”, or a city, village, or urban township may apply for a PSD or BID. “Urban township” means a township that is an urban township as defined in sec\on 2 of the local development financing act, 1986 PA 281, MCL 125.2152, and is a township located in a county with a populaon of more than 750,000 Principal Shopping Districts (PSD) Business Improvement Districts (BID) Business Improvement Zone (BIZ) : PA 120 of 1961 PSD’s and BID’s: Who is eligible? PSD: “Principal shopping district” means a por\on of a local governmental unit designated by the governing body of the local governmental unit that is predominantly commercial and that contains at least 10 retail businesses.
    [Show full text]