DOCSLIB.ORG

Key Knowledge Generation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Key Knowledge Generation This article was downloaded by: Publisher: KKG Publications Registered office: 18, Jalan Kenanga SD 9/7 Bandar Sri Damansara, 52200 Malaysia Key Knowledge Generation Publication details, including instructions for author and subscription information: http://kkgpublications.com/medical-sciences/ Prophylaxis of Peritoneal Adhesions: Practical Issues to Consider When Using Antiadhesion Agents LUZ ANGELA TORRES-DE LA ROCHE 1, ANJA HER- RMANN 2, CRISTINA CEZAR 3, ANGELIKA LARBIG 4, LASSE LEICHER 5, MAYA SOPHIE DE WILDE 6, RUDY LEON DE WILDE 7 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 Carl Von Ossietzky Universitat Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany Published online: 02 March 2017 To cite this article: L. A. T. La Roche, A. Herrmann, C. Cezar, A. Larbig, L. Leicher, M. S. De Wilde and R. L. De Wilde, “Prophylaxis of peritoneal adhesions: Practical issues to consider when using antiadhesion agents,” International Journal of Health and Medical Sciences, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 01-05, 2017. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.20469/ijhms.3.30001-1 To link to this article: http://kkgpublications.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/IJHMS-30001-1.pdf PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE KKG Publications makes every effort to ascertain the precision of all the information (the “Content”) contained in the publications on our platform. However, KKG Publications, our agents, and our licensors make no representations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of the content. All opinions and views stated in this publication are not endorsed by KKG Publications. These are purely the opinions and views of authors. The accuracy of the content should not be relied upon and primary sources of information should be considered for any verification. KKG Publications shall not be liable for any costs, expenses, proceedings, loss, actions, demands, damages, expenses and other liabilities directly or indirectly caused in connection with given content. This article may be utilized for research, edifying, and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduc- tion, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly verboten. International Journal of Health and Medical Sciences 2017, 3:1 01-05 IJHMS PROPHYLAXIS OF PERITONEAL ADHESIONS: PRACTICAL ISSUES TO CONSIDER WHEN USING ANTIADHESION AGENTS LUZ ANGELA TORRES-DE LA ROCHE 1, ANJA HERRMANN 2, CRISTINA CEZAR 3, ANGELIKA LARBIG 4, LASSE LEICHER 5, MAYA SOPHIE DE WILDE 6, RUDY LEON DE WILDE 7∗ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 Carl Von Ossietzky Universitat Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany Keywords: Abstract. As the most frequent complication of abdominal surgery, peritoneal adhesions produce significant morbidity Surgery-Induced and an increased risk of vascular, bowel, and organ injury in subsequent surgeries. Yet, antiadhesion agents are not Tissue Adhesions routinely used in most abdominopelvic surgeries. We present a review on the safety, efficacy, and applicability of available Biocompatible Materials antiadhesion agents to support the surgeons decision-making process and provide accurate counseling to patients regarding the type of agent to be used. Searches were conducted in MEDLINE, Pubmed, Wiley Online Library, Directory of Open Access Journals, and Orbis. Though singular agents have been subjected to randomized controlled trials, few head-to-head Received: 15 September 2016 case-control studies comparing multiply available and in-research antiadhesion agents have been performed as of yet. Accepted: 22 December 2016 Available agents are safe and effective in reducing the incidence of de novo adhesions after abdominopelvic surgery or Published: 02 March 2017 adhesiolysis (up to 89%), but no single agent can fully prevent adhesion formation. The proposed “full conditioning” (86% CO2+ 10% N2O + 4% O2 for the pneumoperitoneum, cooling of the peritoneal cavity, humidification, heparinized rinsing solution and 5 mg of dexamethasone, and hyaluronic acid), showed no adhesion formation (p = 0.0001) in 12/16 women with endometriosis. Surgeons should choose the antiadhesion agent most suitable to the underlying disease, type of surgery, and extent of surgical trauma, although no single available agent or surgical strategy can completely prevent adhesions. Guidelines on adhesion prophylaxis are needed. Future research should focus on comparison and combination of available agents. c 2017 KKG Publications. All rights reserved. INTRODUCTION Adhesions are recognized to be the one of most frequent of different substances capable of reducing the postoperative complications in abdominal surgery [1]. Incidence reports differ formation of adhesions. Then the decision to use these products from 20 to 93 percent [2], according to type of surgery, entry is based on consensus which encourages surgeons to assume techniques, operating times and concomitant diseases. Multiple effective steps to prevent adhesions [6], and are especially rec- adhesiogenic entities have been described, amongst which are ommended in “high-risk of adhesions” procedures, regardless of desiccation, CO2-insufflation, traumatic tissue handling, coagu- open or laparoscopic surgery [7]. Of course, patients should be lation and diseases like endometriosis or pelvic inflammatory informed about the risks of adhesion formation and prevention disease. They arise from an imbalance between fibrin produc- strategies. tion and fibrinolysis during the healing process after the surgical For the purpose to support the surgeon’s decision and to trauma, and their presence implies a high risk of complications give an accurate counselling to patients in regard the type of in further surgeries, affecting the patient’s quality of life and agent to be used, we realized a review on the safety and efficacy the budget of the health system. Affected patients showed an of available Antiadhesion Agents (AA). Again, remembering increased morbidity and mortality [3] with a higher incidence that the first step in adhesions prophylaxis is based on a meticu- of intensive care admission, longer hospital stays and a higher lous surgical technique, and adherence to general microsurgical incidence of bowel resections [4]. Additionally, it is well known rules [3], an issue that is of ultimate interest in gynecology and that adhesions tend to reformate after laparoscopic adhesiolysis fertility surgery. in 55-100% of cases [2]. Nevertheless at this time good evidence about the best Available Antiadhesion Agents option to handle with peritoneal adhesions, and methods to An antiadhesion agent is any natural or synthetic sub- assess their efficacy are lacking. Therefore, prevention of stance capable of interfering the adhesions formation process adhesions is a significant unmet need in surgical therapeutics between adjacent anatomic structures normally not attached to [5]. Investigation in this field had led to the development and use each other [4]. To reach its goal, the agent should act during the ∗Corresponding author: Rudy Leon De Wilde yEmail: [email protected] 2017 Int. J. Heal. Med. Sci. 2 first seven days of peritoneal healing, or staying long enough products that cost e130 or e300 need to demonstrate a 26% or during this critical period of adhesion development, leading to a 60% reduction of adhesion-related readmissions, respectively. minor incidence, extension and severity of adhesions, and their Concluding that healthcare systems could save overall costs by associated disorders. using an AA with a reasonable cost-effectiveness ratio. Factors that need to be considered before using an AA Modern products - films, powder, gels and fluids - are not only safety, usability and clinical outcome but also comply with most of the desirable characteristics required to its cost/effectiveness ratio. In the SCAR study [7], costs of produce an effective barrier between adjacent tissues (Table 1), adhesion-related pathology have been modeled by measur- but surgeons continue using Ringer’s solution, that does not ing adhesion-related readmission within the first 3 years after fulfill the requirements to be a very effective AA [3]. surgery, with or without the use of an AA. To be cost-effective, TABLE 1 DESIRABLE CHARACTERISTICS OF AN ANTIADHESION AGENT Adequate intraperitoneal disposition to stay in the peritoneal cavity for the healing process. Effective surface division. No degradation or loss of efficacy in wet or bloody environment. Being resorbed and metabolized with minimal inflammatory response. Has no negative effect on wound healing. Restriction of bacterial growth. Good cost/effectiveness ratio Nevertheless, evidence of safety and effectivity of AA is In a recent Cochrane review of 18 randomized con- limited as a consequence of paucity and the quality of studies. trolled trials of AA with a total of 1262 women undergoing Most of them are observational, not controlled, and non-head to gynecological surgery [10], it was found that there is no effect of head trials. AA on pain or fertility outcome in women of reproductive age, Other products are no longer used because they show though no adverse effects were reported. They also encountered no clear clinical benefits, like antibiotics, non-steroidal anti- that some AA could have stronger anti adhesion effects than no inflammatory drugs, corticosteroids and fibrinolytic drugs. In treatment after pelvic surgery. case of SurgiWrap R (polylactide: copolymer of 70:30 Poly Agents of oxidized regenerated cellulose (Interceed R ) [L-lactide-co-D,L lactide]), a polymer film designed to be reduce
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The ESGE Junior Platform
    Gynecol Surg (2009) 6 (Suppl 1):S33–S50 DOI 10.1007/s10397-009-0517-z ABSTRACTS The ESGE Junior Platform Techniques and Instrumentations in Laparoscopy Results: Total of 88 second-look operations were performed (63 after LM and 25 after OM). Intrauterine penetration was recorded in 32 JP1_01 cases (in 20 cases of LM and 12 patients with OM). Hysteroscopic finding was completely physiological in the majority of cases (77%), German residents’ experiences in gynaecological surgery in 5 cases (6%) intrauterine synechiae were present. During M. Stumpf, M. Klar, G. Gitsch, M. Runge, M. Foeldi laparoscopy we noticed a slight impression in the place of the uterine Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical suture in 6 patients (all after LM) and 1 utero-peritoneal fistula (after Center, Albert-Ludwigs-University, Freiburg, Germany OM with intrauterine penetration). Intraperitoneal adhesions were present in the total of 69 patients (78%): in 46 patients after LM (73%) Every German resident is taught in gynaecological surgery. Neverthe- and in 24 after OM (96%) (p=0.01). Adhesions were then graded less, a huge discrepancy of surgical skills among participants at the using a modified American Fertility Society (mAFS) scoring method. end of the residency can be observed. Gynaecological surgery is part The uterus mAFS score was applied. The mean mAFS score was 3,92 of the 5 year residency in obstetrics and gynaecology. The mandatory and 1,46 in the OM and LM group respectively (p=0.001). residency objectives are defined by the German Medical Association. Conclusion: In contrast with the physiological hysteroscopic finding A provided log book is mandatory to record achievements.
    [Show full text]
  • AAGL Practice Report: Practice Guidelines for Management of Intrauterine Synechiae
    Special Article AAGL Practice Report: Practice Guidelines for Management of Intrauterine Synechiae AAGL ADVANCING MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY WORLDWIDE Background The search was not restricted to English language literature; committee members fluent in languages other than English re- Intrauterine adhesions (IUAs) have been recognized as viewed relevant articles and provided the committee with rel- a cause of secondary amenorrhea since the end of the 19th ative information translated into English. Because of the century [1], and in the mid-20th century, Asherman further paucity of data in this area, all published works were included described the eponymous condition occurring after preg- for the electronic database searches, and relevant articles not nancy [2]. The terms ‘‘Asherman syndrome’’ and IUAs are available in electronic sources (e.g., published before the be- often used interchangeably, although the syndrome requires ginning of electronic database commencement) were cross- the constellation of signs and symptoms (in this case, pain, referenced from hand-searched bibliographies and included menstrual disturbance, and subfertility in any combination) in the literature review. When necessary, authors were con- and the presence of IUAs [2]. The presence of IUAs in the tacted directly for clarification of points published. absence of symptoms may be best referred to as asymptom- atic IUAs or synechiae. Diagnosis Identification and Assessment of Evidence In women with suspected IUAs, physical examination usually fails to reveal abnormalities [3,4]. Blind transcervical This AAGL Practice Guideline was produced after elec- sounding of the uterus may reveal cervical obstruction at or tronic resources including Medline, PubMed, CINAHL, the near the level of the internal os [3].
    [Show full text]
  • National Institute for Health and Care Excellence
    IP1242 [IPG509] NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CARE EXCELLENCE INTERVENTIONAL PROCEDURES PROGRAMME Interventional procedure overview of hysteroscopic metroplasty of a uterine septum for primary infertility or recurrent miscarriage In some women the uterus (womb) is divided into 2 halves by a thin wall of tissue, called a septum. This may affect fertility and increase the risk of miscarriage. In hysteroscopic metroplasty a thin tube with a camera on the end (a hysteroscope) is inserted into the vagina, through the cervix and into the womb. Instruments are passed through the hysteroscope into the womb and the septum is removed. Introduction The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) has prepared this interventional procedure (IP) overview to help members of the Interventional Procedures Advisory Committee (IPAC) make recommendations about the safety and efficacy of an interventional procedure. It is based on a rapid review of the medical literature and specialist opinion. It should not be regarded as a definitive assessment of the procedure. Date prepared This IP overview was prepared in April 2014 and updated in November 2014. Procedure name Hysteroscopic metroplasty of uterine septum in women with primary infertility or recurrent miscarriage Specialist societies Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG) British Fertility Society. IP overview: hysteroscopic metroplasty of uterine septum in women with primary infertility or recurrent miscarriage 1 of 44 IP1242 [IPG509] Description Indications and current treatment A septate uterus is a type of congenital uterine anomaly, in which the inside of the uterus is divided by a muscular or fibrous wall, called the septum. The septum may be partial or complete, extending as far as the cervix.
    [Show full text]
  • Herestraat 49, B-3000 Leuven Yves Kremer, CU Saint-Luc, Av
    Editor | Prof. Dr. V. Bonhomme CO-Editors | Dr. Y. Kremer — Prof. Dr. M. Van de Velde ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA JOURNAL OF THE BELGIAN SOCIETY OF ANESTHESIOLOGY, RESUSCITATION, PERIOPERATIVE MEDICINE AND PAIN MANAGEMENT (BeSARPP) BELGICA Indexed in EMBASE l EXCERPTA MEDICA ISSN: 2736-5239 Suppl. 1 202071 Master Theses www.besarpp.be Cover-1 -71/suppl.indd 1 12/01/2021 12:37 ACTA ANÆSTHESIOLOGICA BELGICA 2020 – 71 – Supplement 1 EDITORS Editor-in-chief : Vincent Bonhomme, CHU Liège, av. de l’Hôpital 1, B-4000 Liège Co-Editors : Marc Van de Velde, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49, B-3000 Leuven Yves Kremer, CU Saint-Luc, av. Hippocrate, B-1200 Woluwe-Saint-Lambert Associate Editors : Margaretha Breebaart, UZA, Wilrijkstraat 10, B-2650 Edegem Christian Verborgh, UZ Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101, B-1090 Jette Fernande Lois, CHU Liège, av. de l’Hôpital 1, B-4000 Liège Annelies Moerman, UZ Gent, C. Heymanslaan 10, B-9000 Gent Mona Monemi, CU Saint-Luc, av. Hippocrate, B-1200 Woluwe-Saint-Lambert Steffen Rex, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49, B-3000 Leuven Editorial assistant Carine Vauchel Dpt of Anesthesia & ICM, CHU Liège, B-4000 Liège Phone: 32-4 321 6470; Email: [email protected] Administration secretaries MediCongress Charlotte Schaek and Astrid Dedrie Noorwegenstraat 49, B-9940 Evergem Phone : +32 9 218 85 85 ; Email : [email protected] Subscription The annual subscription includes 4 issues and supplements (if any). 4 issues 1 issue (+supplements) Belgium 40€ 110€ Other Countries 50€ 150€ BeSARPP account number : BE97 0018 1614 5649 - Swift GEBABEBB Publicity : Luc Foubert, treasurer, OLV Ziekenhuis Aalst, Moorselbaan 164, B-9300 Aalst, phone: +32 53 72 44 61 ; Email : [email protected] Responsible Editor : Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • Adhesion Prevention in Reproductive Surgery Special Interest Group Reproductive Surgery
    Adhesion prevention in Reproductive Surgery Special Interest Group Reproductive Surgery 3 July 2011 Stockholm, Sweden 7 Adhesion prevention in reproductive surgery Stockholm, Sweden 3 July 2011 Organised by Special Interest Group Reproductive Surgery Contents Course coordinators and target audience Page 5 Programme Page 7 Introduction to ESHRE Page 9 Speakers’ contributions Pathophysiology of adhesion formation – Timur Gürgan (Turkey) Page 17 Adhesion prevention in a laparoscopic mouse model – Maria Mercedes Binda (Belgium) Page 27 Adhesions and reproduction – Stephan Gordts (Belgium) Page 41 Adhesion prophylaxis in clinical routine: lessons learned from experimental models to clinical applications – Luciano Nardo (United Kingdom) Page 63 Postoperative intra uterine adhesions: why? – Pietro Gambadauro (Sweden) Page 75 Hysteroscopic treatment of Asherman syndrome – Tin‐Chiu Li (United Kingdom) Page 89 Prevention of postoperative intra uterine adhesions – Rudi Campo (Belgium) Page 111 Adhesion formation after ovarian drilling comparison of laparoscopy and fertiloscopy – Antoine Watrelot (France) Page 130 No postoperative adhesions anymore: fiction or reality? – Philippe Koninckx (Belgium) Page 137 Upcoming ESHRE Campus Courses Page 151 Notes Page 152 Page 3 of 159 Page 4 of 159 Course coordinators Marco Gergolet, Vassilios Tanos, Rudi Campo, Stephan Gordts Target audience Specialist gynaecologist, particularly those, involving in reproductive and endoscopic surgery Page 5 of 159 Page 6 of 159 Scientific programme 09.00 ‐ 09.30 Pathophysiology
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Hyalobarrier Gel and Seprafilm in Preventing Peritendinous Adhesions Following Crush-Type Injury in a Rat Model
    EXPERIMENTAL STUDY Effects of Hyalobarrier gel and Seprafilm in preventing peritendinous adhesions following crush-type injury in a rat model 1 2 Emel Yurdakul Sıkar, M.D., Hasan Ediz Sıkar, M.D., 3 1 Hüsamettin Top, M.D., Ahmet Cemal Aygıt, M.D., 1Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Bağcılar Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul-Turkey 2Department of General Surgery, Kartal Dr. Lütfi Kirdar Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul-Turkey 3Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Trakya University Faculty of Medicine, Edirne-Turkey ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: In the present study, the aim was to evaluate the effects of Hyalobarrier gel (Anika Therapeutics S.r.l., Abano Terme, Italy) and Seprafilm adhesion barrier (Genzyme Corporation, Cambridge, MA, USA) in the prevention of peritendinous adhesions fol- lowing a crush-type injury. METHODS: Twenty five female Wistar Albino rats, weighing 230 to 270 g and 7 to 9 months of age were randomized into 5 groups. Group 1 was the control group, Group 2 comprised the Hyalobarrier gel group, Group 3 was made up of the Seprafilm-treated subjects, Group 4 was the tendon repair and Hyalobarrier gel group, and Group 5 was the tendon repair and Seprafilm group. Two gastrocnemius muscle tendons of each animal, a total of 50 tendons, were used. The animals were sacrificed with the administration of a high dose of anesthetic on postoperative day 40. Macroscopic evaluation of adhesions was classified by 2 blinded researchers according to Tang’s adhesion grading system. The number of fibroblasts and the density and formation of collagen fibers were noted for histopathological examination.
    [Show full text]
  • Advances, Retreats and Challenges in Adhesions Research
    ЭЛЕКТРОННЫЙ НАУЧНЫЙ ЖУРНАЛ «INNOVA» 2016 №1 (2) Innova-journal.ru 1 HUMANITARIAN SCIENCES ГУМАНИТАРНЫЕ НАУКИ ЭЛЕКТРОННЫЙ НАУЧНЫЙ ЖУРНАЛ «INNOVA» 2016 №1 (2) Innova-journal.ru Founder: Kursk State Medical University. Publisher: MedTestInfo LLC. Chair of Editoral Board: Victor Lazarenko – Doctor of Medical Sciences, Honoured Doctor of Russian Federation. Vice-Editor: Pavel Tkachenko – Doctor of Medical Sciences. Editor-in-Chief: Viacheslav Lipatov – Doctor of Medical Sciences. Technical Secretary: M. David Naimzada. Editorial Board: Daria Alontceva — Doctor of Physical and Mathematical Sciences, Ust-Kamenogorsk, Kazakhstan. Marina Nikolaevna Belogubova — Doctor of Sociological Sciences, Moscow, Russia. Konstantin Enkoyan — Doctor of Medical and Biological Sciences, Erevan, Armenia. Irina Frishman — Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences, Moscow, Russia. Karl-Iosef Gundermann — Doctor of Sciences, Shetcin, Poland. Vladimir Ivanov — Doctor of Biological Sciences, Kursk, Rossia. Sisakian Khmaiak — Doctor of Medical Sciences Erevan, Armenia. Anatolii Lyzikov – Doctor of Medical Sciences , Gomel, Belorus. Viorel Naku — Doctor of Science, Kishinev, Moldova. Leonid Prokopenko — Doctor of Medical Sciences, Kursk, Russia. David Wiseman — Philosophy Doctor, Dallas, USA. Liu Hung-Wen — Philosophy Doctor, Harbin, China. Editorial team: Elena Budko - Doctor of Pharmacy, Kursk, Russia. Tatiana Vasilenko - Doctor of Psychology, Kursk, Russia. Vasiliy Gavrilyuk - Doctor of Medical Sciences, Kursk, Russia. Vitaliy Zotov - Doctor of Social Sciences, Kursk, Russia. Alexander Konichenko - Doctor of Technical Sciences, Kursk, Russia. Elena Kravtsova - Doctor of Historical Sciences, Kursk, Russia. Alexey Loktionov - Doctor of Medical Sciences, Kursk, Russia. Galina Mal - Doctor of Medical Sciences, Kursk, Russia. Povetkin Sergey - Doctor of Medical Sciences, Kursk, Russia. Irina Privalova- Doctor of Biological Sciences, Kursk, Russia. Maria Solodilova - Doctor of Biological Sciences, Kursk, Russia. Irina Shamara - Candidate of Philological Sciences, Kursk, Russia.
    [Show full text]
  • Anti-Adhesion Therapy Following Operative Hysteroscopy for Treatment of Female Subfertility (Review)
    Anti-adhesion therapy following operative hysteroscopy for treatment of female subfertility (Review) Bosteels J, Weyers S, Kasius J, Broekmans FJ, Mol BWJ, D’Hooghe TM This is a reprint of a Cochrane review, prepared and maintained by The Cochrane Collaboration and published in The Cochrane Library 2015, Issue 11 http://www.thecochranelibrary.com For Preview Only Anti-adhesion therapy following operative hysteroscopy for treatment of female subfertility (Review) Copyright © 2015 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. TABLE OF CONTENTS HEADER....................................... 1 ABSTRACT ...................................... 1 PLAINLANGUAGESUMMARY . 2 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS FOR THE MAIN COMPARISON . ..... 4 BACKGROUND .................................... 7 OBJECTIVES ..................................... 9 METHODS ...................................... 9 RESULTS....................................... 13 Figure1. ..................................... 15 Figure2. ..................................... 17 Figure3. ..................................... 18 Figure4. ..................................... 27 Figure5. ..................................... 28 Figure6. ..................................... 30 ADDITIONALSUMMARYOFFINDINGS . 30 DISCUSSION ..................................... 33 Figure7. ..................................... 34 AUTHORS’CONCLUSIONS . 36 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS . 36 REFERENCES ..................................... 37 CHARACTERISTICSOFSTUDIES . 42 DATAANDANALYSES. 82 Analysis 1.1. Comparison 1 Inserted
    [Show full text]
  • Abdominal Adhesions: Current and Novel Therapies
    Journal of Surgical Research 165, 91–111 (2011) doi:10.1016/j.jss.2009.09.015 RESEARCH REVIEW Abdominal Adhesions: Current and Novel Therapies Brian C. Ward, Ph.D.,*,† and Alyssa Panitch, Ph.D.*,1 *Weldon School of Biomedical Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana; and †Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana Submitted for publication July 13, 2009 An adhesion occurs when two tissues that normally Abdominal adhesions place a tremendous burden on freely move past each other attach via a fibrous bridge. public health. Adhesions develop after nearly every ab- Abdominal adhesions place a tremendous clinical and dominal surgery. Multiple studies cite that of patients financial burden on public health. Adhesions develop who have abdominal surgery, 93% will have adhesions after nearly every abdominal surgery, commonly caus- [3, 4]. Many of these adhesions require a second opera- ing female infertility, chronic pelvic pain, and, most tion known as adhesiolysis to break the adhesion. A frequently, small bowel obstruction. A National Hospi- comprehensive study of inpatient care and expendi- tal Discharge Survey of hospitalizations between 1998 tures associated with adhesiolysis procedures in the and 2002 reported that 18.1% of hospitalizations were United States was conducted in 1994. This study found related to abdominal adhesions annually accounting for 948,000 days of inpatient care at an estimated cost that adhesiolysis accounted for 303,836 hospitaliza- of $1.18 billion. tions (1% of the hospitalizations in the United States), This review discusses the current or proposed thera- 846,415 days of inpatient care, and $1.33 billion in hos- pies for abdominal adhesions.
    [Show full text]
  • Studies on the Effectiveness of Endoscopic Surgery in Reproductive Medicine
    UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Studies on the effectiveness of endoscopic surgery in reproductive medicine Bosteels, J.J.A. Publication date 2014 Document Version Final published version Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Bosteels, J. J. A. (2014). Studies on the effectiveness of endoscopic surgery in reproductive medicine. General rights It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulations If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible. UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl) Download date:28 Sep 2021 UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM DISSERTATION Jan Bosteels Studies on The Efffectiveness of Endoscopic Surgery in Reproductive Medicine STUDIES ON THE EFFECTIVENESS OF ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY IN REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE Jan Bosteels Studies on the effectiveness of endoscopic surgery in reproductive medicine Thesis, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands Paranimfen: Wim Laurens, Philippe Delattin Lay out: Jan Bosteels Cover design: Coördesign, Leiden Cover illustration: ’ICSI revisited: Independent and Critically Summarized Investigation’ ISBN 978 90 5629 755 8 NUR 870 © J.
    [Show full text]
  • Efficacy of Barriers and Hypoxia-Inducible Factor Inhibitors
    Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology (2007) 14, 591–599 Efficacy of barriers and hypoxia-inducible factor inhibitors to prevent CO2 pneumoperitoneum-enhanced adhesions in a laparoscopic mouse model Maria Mercedes Binda, PhD, Carlos Roger Molinas, MD, PhD, Adriana Bastidas, MD, Marc Jansen, MD, and Philippe Robert Koninckx, MD, PhD From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium (Drs. Binda, Bastidas, and Koninckx); the Centre for Gynaecological Endoscopy (Cendogyn), Centro Médico La Costa, Asunción, Paraguay (Dr. Molinas); and Department of Surgery, University Clinic, RWTH Aachen, Germany (Dr. Jansen). KEYWORDS: Abstract Barriers; STUDY OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) inhibitors, flotation Flotation; agents, barriers, and a surfactant on pneumoperitoneum-enhanced adhesions in a laparoscopic mouse HIF; model. Hypoxia; DESIGN: Prospective randomized trial (Canadian Task Force classification I). Intraperitoneal SETTING: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Catholic adhesion formation; University of Leuven. Laparoscopy; SUBJECTS: One hundred fourteen female BALB/c mice. Pneumoperitoneum; INTERVENTIONS: Adhesions were induced during laparoscopy in BALB/c female mice. Pneumo- Prevention; peritoneum was maintained for 60 minutes with humidified CO2. In 3 experiments the effects of HIF Surfactant inhibitors such as 17-allylamino 17-demethoxygeldanamycin, radicicol, rapamycin, and wortmanin, flotation agents such as Hyskon and carboxymethylcellulose, barriers such as Hyalobarrier gel and SprayGel, and surfactant such as phospholipids were evaluated. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Adhesions were scored after 7 days during laparotomy. Adhesion formation decreased with the administration of wortmannin (p Ͻ.01), phospholipids (p Ͻ.01), Hyalobarrier Gel (p Ͻ.01), and SprayGel (p Ͻ.01).
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Ovarian Surgery on Ovarian Reserve and Fertility
    From Department of Oncology-Pathology Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden EFFECTS OF OVARIAN SURGERY ON OVARIAN RESERVE AND FERTILITY Tekla Lind Stockholm 2015 All previously published papers were reproduced with permission from the publisher. Published by Karolinska Institutet. Printed by E-PRINT © Tekla Lind, 2015 ISBN 978-91 -7549 -813 -3 Effect of ovarian surgery on ovarian reserve and fertility THESIS FOR DOCTORAL DEGREE (Ph.D.) To be publicly defended at Aulan Södersjukhuset. Friday 27th March 2015, 9.00 am By Tekla Lind Principal Supervisor: Opponent: Kenny Rodriguez-Wallberg, MD PhD Associate Torbjörn Hillensjö, MD PhD Associate Professor Professor Sahlgrenska Akademin Karolinska Institutet Department of Clinical Sciences Department of Oncology- Pathology Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology Karolinska University Hospital, Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine Examination Board: Co-supervisor(s): Matts Olovsson, MD PhD Professor Uppsala University Margareta Hammarström, MD PhD Professor Department of Women and Children’s Health Karolinska Institutet Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology Department of Clinical Science and Education, Södersjukhuset, Britt-Marie Landgren, MD PhD Professor Emerita Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology Karolinska Institutet Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Claudia Lampic, PhD Associate Professor Technology CLINTEC Karolinska Institutet Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology Department of Neurobiology, Care sciences and Britt Friberg, MD PhD Associate Professor Society, Lunds University Division of Nursing Department of Clinical Sciences, Malmö Jan I. Olofsson, MD PhD Associate Professor Division of Reproductive Medicine Karolinska University Hospital Reproductive Medicine Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology To the women who participated in these studies ABSTRACT The objective of this thesis was to investigate short- and long-term effects of ovarian surgery on the ovarian reserve of women of reproductive age.
    [Show full text]