DOCSLIB.ORG

Arxiv:1902.01932V1 [Astro-Ph.IM] 5 Feb 2019

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Arxiv:1902.01932V1 [Astro-Ph.IM] 5 Feb 2019 DRAFT VERSION FEBRUARY 7, 2019 Typeset using LATEX twocolumn style in AASTeX62 The Zwicky Transient Facility: System Overview, Performance, and First Results ERIC C. BELLM,1 SHRINIVAS R. KULKARNI,2 MATTHEW J. GRAHAM,2 RICHARD DEKANY,3 ROGER M. SMITH,3 REED RIDDLE,3 FRANK J. MASCI,4 GEORGE HELOU,4 THOMAS A. PRINCE,2 SCOTT M. ADAMS,2 C. BARBARINO,5 TOM BARLOW,2 JAMES BAUER,6 ∗ RON BECK,4 JUSTIN BELICKI,3 RAHUL BISWAS,7 NADEJDA BLAGORODNOVA,2 DENNIS BODEWITS,6 BRYCE BOLIN,1, 8 , VALERY BRINNEL,9 TIM BROOKE,4 BRIAN BUE,10 MATTIA BULLA,7 RICK BURRUSS,3 S. BRADLEY CENKO,11, 12 CHAN-KAO CHANG (章U¥), 13 ANDREW CONNOLLY,1 MICHAEL COUGHLIN,14 JOHN CROMER,3 VIRGINIA CUNNINGHAM,6 y KISHALAY DE,2 ALEX DELACROIX,3 VANDANA DESAI,4 DMITRY A. DUEV,2 GWENDOLYN EADIE,15, 16, 1 , TONY L. FARNHAM,6 MICHAEL FEENEY,3 ULRICH FEINDT,7 DAVID FLYNN,4 ANNA FRANCKOWIAK,17 S. FREDERICK,6 C. FREMLING,2 z y AVISHAY GAL-YAM,18 SUVI GEZARI,6, 12 MATTEO GIOMI,19 DANIEL A. GOLDSTEIN,2 , V. ZACH GOLKHOU,1, 16 , ARIEL GOOBAR,7 STEVEN GROOM,4 EUGEAN HACOPIANS,4 DAVID HALE,3 JOHN HENNING,3 ANNA Y. Q. HO,2 DAVID HOVER,3 JUSTIN HOWELL,4 TIARA HUNG,6 DANIELA HUPPENKOTHEN,1 DAVID IMEL,4 WING-HUEN IP (I8烜),13, 20 ŽELJKO IVEZIC´ ,1 EDWARD JACKSON,4 LYNNE JONES,1 MARIO JURIC,1 MANSI M. KASLIWAL,2 S. KASPI,21 STEPHEN KAYE,3 MICHAEL S. P. KELLEY,6 MAREK KOWALSKI,9, 17 EMILY KRAMER,22 THOMAS KUPFER,23, 24, 2 WALTER LANDRY,4 RUSS R. LAHER,4 CHIEN-DE LEE,13 HSING WEN LIN (林省文), 25, 13 ZHONG-YI LIN (林忠©),13 RAGNHILD LUNNAN,5 MATTEO GIOMI,19 ASHISH MAHABAL,2, 26 PETER MAO,3 ADAM A. MILLER,27, 28 SERGE MONKEWITZ,4 PATRICK MURPHY,29 CHOW-CHOONG NGEOW,13 JAKOB NORDIN,19 PETER NUGENT,30, 31 ERAN OFEK,32 MARIA T. PATTERSON,1 BRYAN PENPRASE,33 MICHAEL PORTER,3 LUDWIG RAUCH,17 UMAA REBBAPRAGADA,10 DAN REILEY,3 MICKAEL RIGAULT,34 HECTOR RODRIGUEZ,3 JAN VAN ROESTEL,35 BEN RUSHOLME,4 JAKOB VAN SANTEN,17 S. SCHULZE,18 DAVID L. SHUPE,4 LEO P. SINGER,11, 12 MAAYANE T. SOUMAGNAC,18 ROBERT STEIN,17 JASON SURACE,4 JESPER SOLLERMAN,5 PAULA SZKODY,15 F. TADDIA,5 SCOTT TEREK,4 ANGELA VAN SISTINE,36 SJOERT VAN VELZEN,6 W. THOMAS VESTRAND,37 RICHARD WALTERS,3 CHARLOTTE WARD,6 QUAN-ZHI YE (I泉志), 4, 2 PO-CHIEH YU (俞伯傑), 13 LIN YAN,2 AND JEFFRY ZOLKOWER3 1DIRAC Institute, Department of Astronomy, University of Washington, 3910 15th Avenue NE, Seattle, WA 98195, USA 2Division of Physics, Mathematics, and Astronomy, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA 3Caltech Optical Observatories, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA 4Infrared Processing and Analysis Center, California Institute of Technology, MS 100-22, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA 5The Oskar Klein Centre & Department of Astronomy, Stockholm University, AlbaNova, SE-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden 6Department of Astronomy, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA 7The Oskar Klein Centre, Department of Physics, Stockholm University, AlbaNova, SE-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden 8B612 Asteroid Institute, 20 Sunnyside Ave, Suite 427, Mill Valley, Ca 94941 9Institute of Physics, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Newtonstr. 15, 124 89 Berlin, Germany 10Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91109, USA 11Astrophysics Science Division, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, MC 661, Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA 12Joint Space-Science Institute, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA 13Institute of Astronomy, National Central University, 32001, Taiwan 14Division of Physics, Math, and Astronomy, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA 15Department of Astronomy, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA 16The eScience Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA 17Deutsches Elektronensynchrotron, Platanenallee 6, D-15738, Zeuthen, Germany 18Department of Particle Physics and Astrophysics, Weizmann Institute of Science 234 Herzl St., Rehovot, 76100, Israel 19Institute of Physics, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Newtonstr. 15, 12489 Berlin, Germany 20Space Science Institute, Macau University of Science and Technology, Macau 21 arXiv:1902.01932v1 [astro-ph.IM] 5 Feb 2019 School of Physics & Astronomy and Wise Observatory, The Raymond and Beverly Sackler Faculty of Exact Sciences, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv 6997801, Israel 22Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, CA 91109, USA 23Kavli Institute for Theoretical Physics, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA 24Department of Physics, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA 25Department of Physics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA 26Center for Data Driven Discovery, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA 27Center for Interdisciplinary Exploration and Research in Astrophysics and Department of Physics and Astronomy, Northwestern University, 2145 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208, USA Corresponding author: Eric Bellm [email protected] 2 BELLM ET AL. 28The Adler Planetarium, Chicago, IL 60605, USA 29Formerly of Caltech Optical Observatories, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA 30Computational Science Department, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, 1 Cyclotron Road, MS 50B-4206, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA 31Department of Astronomy, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-3411, USA 32Benoziyo Center for Astrophysics and the Helen Kimmel Center for Planetary Science, Weizmann Institute of Science, 76100 Rehovot, Israel 33Soka University of America, Aliso Viejo, CA 92656, USA 34UniversitClermont Auvergne, CNRS/IN2P3, Laboratoire de Physique de Clermont, F-63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France. 35Department of Astrophysics/IMAPP, Radboud University Nijmegen, P.O. Box 9010, 6500 GL Nijmegen, The Netherlands 36Center for Gravitation, Cosmology and Astrophysics, Department of Physics, University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee, P.O. Box 413, Milwaukee, WI 53201, USA 37Los Alamos National Laboratory, P.O. Box 1663, Los Alamos, NM 874545, USA ABSTRACT The Zwicky Transient Facility (ZTF) is a new optical time-domain survey that uses the Palomar 48-inch Schmidt telescope. A custom-built wide-field camera provides a 47 deg2 field of view and 8 second readout time, yielding more than an order of magnitude improvement in survey speed relative to its predecessor survey, the Palomar Transient Factory (PTF). We describe the design and implementation of the camera and observing system. The ZTF data system at the Infrared Processing and Analysis Center provides near-real-time reduc- tion to identify moving and varying objects. We outline the analysis pipelines, data products, and associated archive. Finally, we present on-sky performance analysis and first scientific results from commissioning and the early survey. ZTF’s public alert stream will serve as a useful precursor for that of the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope. 1. INTRODUCTION Research survey (LINEAR; Stokes et al. 2000), the Super- Large optical sky surveys have served as engines of dis- nova Legacy Survey (SNLS; Astier et al. 2006), Palomar- covery throughout the history of astronomy. By cataloging Quest (Djorgovski et al. 2008), the Catalina Sky Survey large samples of astrophysical objects, these surveys provide (CSS; Larson et al. 2003) and associated Catalina Real-Time literal and metaphorical finder charts for detailed followup Transient Survey (CRTS; Drake et al. 2009), Skymapper observations with larger and more expensive telescopes. (Keller et al. 2007), PanSTARRS (Kaiser et al. 2010), the In the last century, among the most influential sky sur- Palomar Transient Factory (PTF; Law et al. 2009), the All- veys were the Palomar Observatory Sky Surveys. Conducted Sky Automated Survey for Supernovae (ASAS-SN; Shappee with photographic plates using the wide-field Palomar 48- et al. 2014), the Asteroid Terrestrial-impact Last Alert Sys- inch Schmidt telescope (Harrington 1952), the first and sec- tem (ATLAS; Tonry et al. 2018), the Korea Microlensing ond sky surveys (POSS-I, Minkowski & Abell 1963; POSS- Telescope Network (KMTNet; Kim et al. 2016), the Dark En- II, Reid et al. 1991) mapped the Northern Hemisphere sky ergy Survey (Dark Energy Survey Collaboration 2005; Dark and enabled fifty years of discovery. A digitized version1 Energy Survey Collaboration et al. 2016) and other surveys (Lasker 1994; Djorgovski et al. 1998) is still widely used to- using the Dark Energy Camera (Flaugher et al. 2015), Hy- day. per Suprime-Cam (Miyazaki et al. 2018; Aihara et al. 2018), The advent of solid-state charge coupled devices (CCDs) and the Evryscope (Law et al. 2015), surveys exploited these provided a huge leap in the quantum efficiency (QE) of as- new capabilities to improve a subset of depth, areal coverage, tronomical cameras, enabling existing telescopes to reach filter selection, and/or time-domain sampling. greater depths with shorter exposures. Contemporaneous im- Here we present a new sky survey, the Zwicky Transient 2 provements in CCD controller readout time and computer Facility (ZTF) . ZTF’s new CCD camera for the first time processing speed have increased data volumes while allow- fills the focal plane of the Palomar 48-inch Schmidt, provid- ing data processing to keep pace. Beginning especially with ing three orders of magnitude improvement in survey speed the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS; York et al. 2000) but relative to the photographic surveys, by virtue of higher QE also including the Optical Gravitational Lensing Experiment and substantial reduction in time between exposures. If it (OGLE; Udalski et al. 1992), the All-Sky Automated Survey could ignore daylight, ZTF could repeat the entire POSS sur- (ASAS; Pojmanski 1997), the Lincoln Near-Earth Asteroid vey in one day. This paper provides a general overview of the ZTF observ- ing and data systems, describes the on-sky performance and ∗ B612 Asteroid Institute and DIRAC Institute Postdoctoral Fellow public surveys, and presents initial results in transient, vari- y Moore-Sloan, WRF, and DIRAC Fellow z Hubble Fellow 1 http://stdatu.stsci.edu/dss/ 2 http://ztf.caltech.edu THE ZWICKY TRANSIENT FACILITY 3 able, and solar system science.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ice& Stone 2020
    Ice & Stone 2020 WEEK 41: OCTOBER 4-10 Presented by The Earthrise Institute # 41 Authored by Alan Hale This week in history OCTOBER 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 OCTOBER 4, 2020: The main-belt asteroid (1679) Nevanlinna will occult the 7th-magnitude star HD 224945 in Pisces. The predicted path of the occultation crosses Newfoundland, part of the Maritime Provinces of Canada, the northeastern through the south-central U.S. (including Houston, Texas), north-central Mexico (including the northern regions of Monterrey, Nuevo Leon), and the southern Pacific Ocean. OCTOBER 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 OCTOBER 7, 2008: Twenty hours after its discovery by Richard Kowalski during the course of the Mount Lemmon Survey in Arizona, the tiny asteroid 2008 TC3 enters Earth’s atmosphere above Sudan, explodes, and drops meteorite fragments – the Almahata Sitta meteorite – on the Nubian Desert. This is the first instance of an impacting asteroid being discovered in space while still inbound to an impact, and it is the subject of this week’s “Special Topics” presentation. OCTOBER 7, 2009: Astronomers using the Infrared Telescope Facility in Hawaii announce that the surface of the large main-belt asteroid (24) Themis appears to be completely covered with water ice. The significance of this discovery is discussed in a previous “Special Topics” presentation. OCTOBER 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 OCTOBER 8, 1769: Comet Messier C/1769 P1 passes through perihelion at a heliocentric distance of 0.123 AU. This was the brightest comet discovered by the 18th-Century French comet hunter Charles Messier and is a previous “Comet of the Week.” OCTOBER 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 OCTOBER 9, 1933: A brief but strong “storm” of Draconid meteors is seen over Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • NASA Ames Jim Arnold, Craig Burkhardt Et Al
    The re-entry of artificial meteoroid WT1190F AIAA SciTech 2016 1/5/2016 2008 TC3 Impact October 7, 2008 Mohammad Odeh International Astronomical Center, Abu Dhabi Peter Jenniskens SETI Institute Asteroid Threat Assessment Project (ATAP) - NASA Ames Jim Arnold, Craig Burkhardt et al. Michael Aftosmis - NASA Ames 2 Darrel Robertson - NASA Ames Next TC3 Consortium http://impact.seti.org Mission Statement: Steve Larson (Catalina Sky Survey) “Be prepared for the next 2008 TC3 John Tonry (ATLAS) impact” José Luis Galache (Minor Planet Center) Focus on two aspects: Steve Chesley (NASA JPL) 1. Airborne observations of the reentry Alan Fitzsimmons (Queen’s Univ. Belfast) 2. Rapid recovery of meteorites Eileen Ryan (Magdalena Ridge Obs.) Franck Marchis (SETI Institute) Ron Dantowitz (Clay Center Observatory) Jay Grinstead (NASA Ames Res. Cent.) Peter Jenniskens (SETI Institute - POC) You? 5 NASA/JPL “Sentry” early alert October 3, 2015: WT1190F Davide Farnocchia (NASA/JPL) Catalina Sky Survey: Richard Kowalski Steve Chesley (NASA/JPL) Marco Michelli (ESA NEOO CC) 6 WT1190F Found: October 3, 2015: one more passage Oct. 24 Traced back to: 2013, 2012, 2011, …, 2009 Re-entry: Friday November 13, 2015 10.61 km/s 20.6º angle Bill Gray 11 IAC + UAE Space Agency chartered commercial G450 Mohammad Odeh (IAC, Abu Dhabi) Support: UAE Space Agency Dexter Southfield /Embry-Riddle AU 14 ESA/University Stuttgart 15 SETI Institute 16 Dexter Southfield team Time UAE Camera Trans-Lunar Insertion Stage Leading candidate (1/13/2016): LUNAR PROSPECTOR T.L.I.S. Launch: January 7, 1998 UT Lunar Prospector itself was deliberately crashed on Moon July 31, 1999 Carbon fiber composite Spin hull thrusters Titanium case holds Amonium Thiokol Perchlorate fuel and Star Stage 3700S HTPB binder (both contain H) P.I.: Alan Binder Scott Hubbard 57-minutes later: Mission Director Separation of TLIS NASA Ames http://impact.seti.org 30 .
    [Show full text]
  • The Comet's Tale
    THE COMET’S TALE Journal of the Comet Section of the British Astronomical Association Number 33, 2014 January Not the Comet of the Century 2013 R1 (Lovejoy) imaged by Damian Peach on 2013 December 24 using 106mm F5. STL-11k. LRGB. L: 7x2mins. RGB: 1x2mins. Today’s images of bright binocular comets rival drawings of Great Comets of the nineteenth century. Rather predictably the expected comet of the century Contents failed to materialise, however several of the other comets mentioned in the last issue, together with the Comet Section contacts 2 additional surprise shown above, put on good From the Director 2 appearances. 2011 L4 (PanSTARRS), 2012 F6 From the Secretary 3 (Lemmon), 2012 S1 (ISON) and 2013 R1 (Lovejoy) all Tales from the past 5 th became brighter than 6 magnitude and 2P/Encke, 2012 RAS meeting report 6 K5 (LINEAR), 2012 L2 (LINEAR), 2012 T5 (Bressi), Comet Section meeting report 9 2012 V2 (LINEAR), 2012 X1 (LINEAR), and 2013 V3 SPA meeting - Rob McNaught 13 (Nevski) were all binocular objects. Whether 2014 will Professional tales 14 bring such riches remains to be seen, but three comets The Legacy of Comet Hunters 16 are predicted to come within binocular range and we Project Alcock update 21 can hope for some new discoveries. We should get Review of observations 23 some spectacular close-up images of 67P/Churyumov- Prospects for 2014 44 Gerasimenko from the Rosetta spacecraft. BAA COMET SECTION NEWSLETTER 2 THE COMET’S TALE Comet Section contacts Director: Jonathan Shanklin, 11 City Road, CAMBRIDGE. CB1 1DP England. Phone: (+44) (0)1223 571250 (H) or (+44) (0)1223 221482 (W) Fax: (+44) (0)1223 221279 (W) E-Mail: [email protected] or [email protected] WWW page : http://www.ast.cam.ac.uk/~jds/ Assistant Director (Observations): Guy Hurst, 16 Westminster Close, Kempshott Rise, BASINGSTOKE, Hampshire.
    [Show full text]
  • Three Decades of Small-Telescope Science
    Three Decades of Small-Telescope Science A Report on the 2011 Society for Astronomical Sciences 30th Annual Sym- posium on Telescope Science Robert K. Buchheim For three decades, the Society for Astronomical Sciences has supported small telescope sci- ence, encouraged amateur research, and facilitated pro-am collaboration. On May 24-26, more than one hundred participants in the 30th anniversary SAS Symposium heard presentations cov- ering a wide range of astronomical topics, reaching from the laboratory to the distant cosmos. From Planets to Galaxies Sky & Telescope Editor-in-Chief Bob Naeye opened the technical session with a review of the amateur contributions to exoplanet discovery and research through monitoring of transits and micro-lensing events. R. Jay GaBany described his participation as an astro-imager in the search for evidence of galactic mergers. His exquisite deep images taken with his 24-inch telescope displayed the di- verse patterns of star streams that can be left behind when a dwarf galaxy is disrupted and ab- sorbed by a larger galaxy. He also noted that not all faint structures are evidence of galactic mergers: the faint ”loop” structure near M-81 is actually foreground “galactic cirrus” in our own Milky Way masquerading as a faux tidal loop. Education and Outreach Several papers related to education and outreach were presented. Debra Ceravolo applied her expertise in the generation and perception of colors, to describe a new method of merging narrow-band (e.g. Hα) and broad-band (e.g. RGB) images into a natural-color image that displays enhanced detail without glaring false colors.
    [Show full text]
  • Planetary Defense Final Report I
    Team Project - Planetary Defense Final Report i Team Project - Planetary Defense Final Report ii Team Project - Planetary Defense Cover designed by: Tihomir Dimitrov Images courtesy of: Earth Image - NASA US Geological Survey Detection Image - ESA's Optical Ground Station Laser Tags ISS Deflection Image - IEEE Space Based Lasers Collaboration Image - United Nations General Assembly Building Outreach Image - Dreamstime teacher with students in classroom Evacuation Image - Libyan City of Syrte destroyed in 2011 Shield Image - Silver metal shield PNG image The cover page was designed to include a visual representation of the roadmap for a robust Planetary Defense Program that includes five elements: detection, deflection, global collaboration, outreach, and evacuation. The shield represents the idea of defending our planet, giving confidence to the general public that the Planetary Defense elements are reliable. The orbit represents the comet threat and how it is handled by the shield, which represents the READI Project. The curved lines used in the background give a sense of flow representing the continuation and further development for Planetary Defense programs after this team project, as we would like for everyone to be involved and take action in this noble task of protecting Earth. The 2015 Space Studies Program of the International Space University was hosted by the Ohio University, Athens, Ohio, USA. While all care has been taken in the preparation of this report, ISU does not take any responsibility for the accuracy of its content.
    [Show full text]
  • The Recovery of Asteroid 2008 TC3
    Meteoritics & Planetary Science 1–33 (2010) doi: 10.1111/j.1945-5100.2010.01116.x The recovery of asteroid 2008 TC3 Muawia H. SHADDAD1, Peter JENNISKENS2*, Diyaa NUMAN1, Ayman M. KUDODA1, Saadia ELSIR3, Ihab F. RIYAD1, Awad Elkareem ALI4, Mohammed ALAMEEN1, Nada M. ALAMEEN1, Omer EID1, Ahmed T. OSMAN1, Mohamed I. AbuBAKER1, Mohamed YOUSIF1, Steven R. CHESLEY5, Paul W. CHODAS5, Jim ALBERS2, Wayne N. EDWARDS6,7, Peter G. BROWN6, Jacob KUIPER8, and Jon M. FRIEDRICH9,10 1Department of Physics, University of Khartoum, P.O. Box 321, Khartoum 11115, Sudan 2SETI Institute, Carl Sagan Center, 189 Bernardo Avenue, Mountain View, California 94043, USA 3Department of Physics, Juba University, P.O. Box 321, Khartoum 11115, Juba, Sudan 4Department of Chemistry, University of Khartoum, P.O. Box 321, Khartoum 11115, Sudan 5Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91109, USA 6Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario N6A 3K7, Canada 7Canadian Hazards Information Service, Natural Resources Canada, 7 Observatory Crescent Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0Y3, Canada 8Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute, Wilhelminalaan 10, 3732 GK De Bilt, The Netherlands 9Department of Chemistry, Fordham University, 441 East Fordham Road, Bronx, New York 10458, USA 10Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, American Museum of Natural History, 79th Street at Central Park West, New York, New York 10025, USA *Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] (Received 25 January 2010; revision accepted 17 September 2010) Abstract–On October 7, 2008, asteroid 2008 TC3 impacted Earth and fragmented at 37 km altitude above the Nubian Desert in northern Sudan. The area surrounding the asteroid’s approach path was searched, resulting in the first recovery of meteorites from an asteroid observed in space.
    [Show full text]
  • 2008 TC3: the Small Asteroid with an Impact
    Meteoritics & Planetary Science 45, Nr 10–11, 1553–1556 (2010) doi: 10.1111/j.1945-5100.2010.01156.x Introduction 2008 TC3: The small asteroid with an impact The story is now familiar: On October 6, 2008, THE IMPACT OF 2008 TC3 ON METEORITICS & Richard Kowalski at the Catalina Sky Survey in PLANETARY SCIENCE Arizona spotted a small 3 m sized asteroid, now named 2008 TC3. It was soon discovered that, 20 h later, this And what an asteroid it was! The research asteroid was to impact Earth. Steve Chesley of presented here sheds new light on the smelting process NASA ⁄ JPL calculated an impact location in the Nubian recognized in the ureilites. The cooling rates calculated desert of northern Sudan. In the hours before impact, from the quenching of the smelting implied that a astronomers measured the light curve of the rare protoplanet broke in 10–100 m sized fragments tumbling asteroid and a reflectance spectrum, describing following a giant collision. Those fragments were later its shape and taxonomic type. This was the first time that ground down into the tiny pieces found in 2008 TC3, an asteroid was studied in space before hitting the Earth. presumably in subsequent collisions. The final fragments In the predawn hour of October 7, satellites gathered in loosely welded together assemblages of recorded the fireball west of Station 6, putting the main small millimeter and sub-millimeter sized fragments, )20 magnitude detonation at a high 37 km altitude. The with much pore space in between. Other fragments of impact happened around the time of morning prayer.
    [Show full text]
  • Asteroid 2018 LA Impacts Earth on June 2, 2018
    Asteroid 2018 LA Impacts Earth on June 2, 2018 The small (<3 meters in size) asteroid 2018 LA impacted Earth’s atmosphere on 2 June 2018 at 16:44 UTC (12:44 PM EDT) and was discovered by the NASA-funded Catalina Sky Survey (University of Arizona) ~8 hours prior to its impact. Two further observations by the NASA-funded ATLAS (Asteroid Terrestrial-impact Last Alert System, University of Hawai’i) site on Mauna Loa confirmed the object. In the 20-year history of NASA’s Near-Earth Object Observations Program, this is the third time an object has been discovered and an impact solution calculated prior to impact. The previous bodies were 2008 TC3 (impacting over Sudan) and 2014 AA (impacting over the middle of the Atlantic Ocean), and all three asteroids were discovered by Catalina Sky Survey astronomer Richard Kowalski (image). The Minor Planet Center and JPL’s Center for NEO Studies (CNEOS) alerted the Planetary Defense Coordination Office of a potential impact. CNEOS calculated an initial impact corridor (left) and considerably narrowed it (right) once additional observations, including one “precovery” observation, became available. This was a much smaller object than NASA is tasked to detect and warn about, but this real- world event exercised capabilities and gave some confidence that NASA’s impact prediction models are adequate to inform response to the potential impact of a larger object. Citizen report on the bolide: The fireball was seen over Botswana, lasted ~3.5 seconds, and flared with -27 magnitude (the Sun is slightly brighter than -26). The resultant energy imparted to Earth’s atmosphere was just shy of 1 kiloton equivalent TNT.
    [Show full text]
  • The Comet's Tale
    THE COMET’S TALE Newsletter of the Comet Section of the British Astronomical Association Number 29, 2010 January The Central Bureau for Astronomical Telegrams (CBAT) The Central Bureau for Astronomical Telegrams be supernovae, comets, novae and other unusual (CBAT) has recently celebrated the 125th anniversary variable stars, and satellites of minor planets and major since its founding by the editors of Astronomische planets – both discovery information and follow-up Nachrichten at Kiel, Germany, in late 1882. The information. Contributors also send information to the immediate cause was the sudden appearance of the CBAT regarding novae in other galaxies, and while great September sungrazing comet, for which a publication is generally made of novae in galaxies other coordinated worldwide center was seen to be much than M31, the CBAT webpage devoted to M31 novae needed, due to problems in getting proper information now appears satisfactorily to provide a venue for circulated quickly to the astronomical community. The designating and announcing new novae in that nearby CBAT moved to Copenhagen Observatory out of galaxy, with suitable follow-up observations also necessity during World War I, where it took on IAU provided there. Following discussion with IAU acceptance in 1922 (after an initial 2-year stint of an Commission 22 in Prague in 2006, reports on new IAU Central Bureau floundered in Brussels); the IAU's meteor showers also are now routinely published by the Central Bureau remained at Copenhagen until its CBAT. transfer to Cambridge at the start of 1965 (where Harvard College Observatory had maintained the The years 2006-2008 continued the marked transition western hemisphere's central bureau for astronomical toward the increased issuance of Central Bureau telegrams since 1883).
    [Show full text]
  • Asteroid 2018 LA Impacts Earth on June 2, 2018
    Asteroid 2018 LA Impacts Earth on June 2, 2018 The small (<3 meters in size) asteroid 2018 LA impacted Earth’s atmosphere on 2 June 2018 at 16:44 UTC (12:44 PM EDT) and was discovered ~8 hours prior to its impact by the NASA-funded Catalina Sky Survey (University of Arizona). Two further observations by the NASA-funded ATLAS (Asteroid Terrestrial-impact Last Alert System, University of Hawai’i) site on Mauna Loa confirmed the object. In the 20-year history of NASA’s Near-Earth Object Observations Program, this is the third time an object has been discovered and an impact solution calculated prior to impact. The previous bodies were 2008 TC3 (impacting over Sudan) and 2014 AA (impacting over the middle of the Atlantic Ocean), and all three asteroids were discovered by Catalina Sky Survey astronomer Richard Kowalski (image). The Minor Planet Center and JPL’s Center for NEO Studies (CNEOS) alerted the Planetary Defense Coordination Office of a potential impact. CNEOS calculated an initial impact corridor (left) and considerably narrowed it (right) once additional observations, including one “precovery” observation, became available. This was a much smaller object than NASA is tasked to detect and warn about, but this real- world event exercised capabilities and gave some confidence that NASA’s impact prediction models are adequate to inform response to the potential impact of a larger object. Citizen report on the bolide: The fireball was seen over Botswana, lasted ~3.5 seconds, and flared with -27 magnitude (the Sun is slightly brighter than -26). The resultant energy imparted to Earth’s atmosphere was just shy of 1 kiloton equivalent TNT.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of the Association of Lunar & Planetary Observers
    Journal of the Association of Lunar & Planetary Observers The Strolling Astronomer Volume 43, Number 1 Winter 2001 Now in Portable Document Format (PDF) for Macintosh and PC-Compatible Computers Inside . The Spokes of Venus In 1896, Percival Lowell revealed his belief that markings he saw while observing Venus “radiate like spokes” as shown in one of his drawings (above). Compare this with an image taken April 30, 1999 by Frank J. Melillo using a Celestron 8-inch Starlight Xpress MX-5. See report by Richard Baum inside. Also . A new Journal of the ALPO debuts, report on the Mercury transit, a tour of the lunar Aristarchus Pla- teau, Mars perihelic apparition report, observing Phobos and Deimos, report on a new solar filter, book review on Wide Field Astrophotography, plus ALPO section news, a Call-for-Papers for the ALPO/ALCON conference and much, much more. The Strolling Astronomer Journal of the In This Issue: Association of Lunar & The ALPO Pages Planetary Observers, 2 A Call-for-Papers: ALPO at ALCON Approaches The Strolling Astronomer 2 History Section Volume 43, No. 1, Winter 2001 2 Solar Section This issue published in April 2001 for distribution in 2Mercury Section both portable document format (pdf) and also hardcopy 2 Jupiter, Youth and Remote Planets sec- format. tions 3 ALPO Website This publication is the official journal of the Association of Lunar and Planetary Observers (ALPO). Features 1 Guest Column: Walter Haas The purpose of this journal is to share observation 4 Mercury — Finding That Little Rock reports, opinions, and other news from ALPO members 6 CCD/UV Images of Venus Revive with other members and the professional astronomical community.
    [Show full text]
  • 9781107061446 Index.Pdf
    Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-06144-6 - Asteroids: Relics of Ancient Time Michael K. Shepard Index More information Index absolute magnitude binary, see asteroids, moons correlation with asteroid size 289 Centaurs, see Centaurs definition 45 classification, see asteroid classification search program limits 288, 295 Edgeworth–Kuiper belt, see trans- stellar 45 Neptunian objects achondrite families, see Hirayama families aubrite, see enstatite achondrite Hildas 65 definition 113 naming conventions 28 diogenite 114 near-Earth, see near-Earth asteroids eucrite 113 origin of term 13 exotic or unusual 115 regolith 122 howardite 114 satellites, see asteroids, moons howardite–eucrite–diogenite 114, 127, search programs, see asteroid search 274 programs irons, see iron meteorites spectra, see specific asteroids lunar 120 threats, see impacts Martian 119 trans-Neptunian object, see trans- mesosiderite 116 Neptunian object pallasite, see pallasites Trojan 19–20 primitive 115 asteroids, moons shergotite–nakhlite–chassignite 119 45 Eugenia 244 urelite 5, 115 87 Sylvia 245 adaptive optics 90 Antiope 244 definition 44 243 Ida and Dactyl 243 guide star 225 762 Pulcova 245 operation 224–5 185851 2000 DP107 245 resolution 225 2001 SN263 245 albedo, visual 48 discovery methods 245 Alvarez, Walter and Luis 132 formation mechanisms 246–7 Apophis, asteroid 99942 population reservoirs 245 discovery 283 asteroids, number and name history of threat 283–4 1 Ceres, see Ceres, asteroid 1 size 283 2 Pallas, see Pallas, asteroid 2 Torino scale 293 3 Juno 15 Arnold, Steve 97 4 Vesta, see Vesta, asteroid 4 asteroids 21 Lutetia, see Lutetia, asteroid 21 albedo 48 45 Eugenia 244 Amor, see near-Earth asteroids 87 Sylvia 245 Aten, see near-Earth asteroids 90 Antiope 244 Apollo, see near-Earth asteroids 135 Hertha 230 Atira, Aphohele, see near-Earth asteroids 243 Ida and Dactyl 243 341 © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-06144-6 - Asteroids: Relics of Ancient Time Michael K.
    [Show full text]