DOCSLIB.ORG

Investment Board Meeting Agenda Thursday, June 17, 2021 Conference Telephone #: 646-558-8656 Meeting ID: 880 9951 0401 8:30 A.M

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Investment Board Meeting Agenda Thursday, June 17, 2021 Conference Telephone #: 646-558-8656 Meeting ID: 880 9951 0401 8:30 A.M Investment Board Meeting Agenda Thursday, June 17, 2021 Conference Telephone #: 646-558-8656 Meeting ID: 880 9951 0401 8:30 a.m. – 12:00 p.m. 8:30 a.m. Call to Order 8:30 a.m. Approval of March 26, 2021, Board Meeting Minutes 8:35 a.m. CEO Report – Greg Samorajski 8:45 a.m. CEO Across-the-Board Salary Adjustment Greg Samorajski, IPERS 8:50 a.m. IPERS Investment Staff Reports Beta Report – Karl Koch Alpha Report – Investment Team Risk Report – Sriram Lakshminarayanan CIO Updates – Karl Koch 9:10 a.m. Private Markets Overview and Outlook Shawn Quinn, Wilshire Associates 9:25 a.m. Private Markets Program Annual Review Pat Reinhardt, IPERS 10:05 a.m. Break 10:15 a.m. Private Equity Program Review Doug LeBon, Richard Mazer and Jason Jenkins, Pathway Capital Management 10:45 a.m. Proposed Private Markets Investment Policy Revisions Pat Reinhardt, IPERS 11:00 a.m. Opportunistic Private Credit Manager Hiring Recommendations Pat Reinhardt, IPERS 11:15 a.m. Securities Lending Program Review Jina Bresson, State Treasurer’s Office 11:30 a.m. Securities Litigation Report Elizabeth Hennessey, IPERS 11:45 a.m. Public Comments 11:55 a.m. Other Business Confirm Next Board Meeting Dates of September 15–16, 2021 Next BAC Meeting is Monday, August 23, 2021 12:00 p.m. Adjourn IOWA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES’ RETIREMENT SYSTEM INVESTMENT BOARD MEETING MINUTES Video / Telephonic Meeting March 26, 2021 The following people participated in the telephonic IPERS Investment Board meeting held on Friday, March 26, 2021. Members of the Board – Present Lisa Stange, Chair Representative Brian Lohse David Creighton, Vice Chair Representative Mary Mascher Mike Duncan Senator Pam Jochum Treasurer Michael Fitzgerald Senator Mark Lofgren Justin Kirchhoff Phyllis Peterson Kris Rowley Administration Greg Samorajski, CEO Luca Rassenti, Investment Officer Karl Koch, CIO Kevin Terdal, Investment Officer Sriram Lakshminarayanan, CRO Melinda McElroy, Executive Assistant Sheldon Lien, Senior Investment Officer David Martin, Chief Benefits Officer Pat Reinhardt, Senior Investment Officer Rick Hindman, Chief Information Officer Keith Scholten, Senior Investment Officer Shawna Lode, Director of Communications Consultants and Presenters Rose Dean, Wilshire Associates Ali Kazemi, Wilshire Associates Shawn Quinn, Wilshire Associates 2 Call to Order Lisa Stange, chair, called the meeting to order at 8:30 a.m. She began the meeting welcoming Representative Brian Lohse to the Board. Approval of Minutes from Previous Meeting David Creighton made the motion to approve the December 3, 2020, Investment Board meeting minutes. Phyllis Peterson seconded. The minutes were approved by unanimous roll call vote. Ayes: Lisa Stange, David Creighton, Mike Duncan, Treasurer Michael Fitzgerald, Justin Kirchhoff, Phyllis Peterson and Kris Rowley Nays: None Absent: None MOTION PASSED CEO Report – Greg Samorajski Greg Samorajski reported that the IPERS building continues to be closed to the public due to the COVID-19 pandemic and most employees are still working remotely. He next reviewed that IPERS has requested an incremental appropriation of $1.135 million in FY2022 and FY2023 to hire four new investment professionals. Governor Reynolds supported IPERS’ request, the next step is to get legislative support. Calendar Year 2020 Investment Performance Review – Rose Dean and Ali Kazemi Rose Dean and Ali Kazemi of Wilshire Associates reported that at December 31, 2020, the Total Fund performance for the calendar year was 13.5%, underperforming the policy benchmark return of 13.9%. The presentation also included a return/risk ranking, sources of risk and a performance review of each publicly traded asset class and the managers within each class. Internal Equity Management Update Discussions were held regarding developing an internal equity management program with a portion of IPERS’ assets. The Board will revisit the issue in September. IPERS Investment Staff Reports Beta Report Karl Koch reviewed the beta report, noting the Fund’s estimated market value of $39.528 billion as of March 12, 2021, the date of the report. All asset classes were within policy ranges. Alpha Report The investment staff reviewed the alpha report noting minor performance concerns continue with Janus Capital, a domestic equity manager, and IPM Informed Portfolio Management, a liquid absolute return strategy manager. 3 Risk Report Sriram Lakshminarayanan presented IPERS’ risk monitoring reports. He noted that active risk is back down to normal levels. CIO Updates Karl Koch updated the Board on several matters including the status of implementing ARP strategies and two upcoming RFPs. The first RFP will be for private markets investment tracking software, and the second for investment consulting services. The investment consultant search is required because the contract with Wilshire Associates expires September 30, 2021. Opportunistic Private Credit Manager Hiring Recommendations – Pat Reinhardt Pat Reinhardt explained that the opportunistic private credit search is being completed in two parts. In the first part of the search, multi-strategy and mezzanine submissions were evaluated. In the second part, the remainder of the submissions (specialty finance, real assets, special situations and other) will be evaluated. Staff requested the Investment Board approve the following hiring recommendations for the first part of the search: • Hire Marathon Asset Management and Crestline Investors each for $250 million allocations in multi-strategy opportunistic credit mandates subject to final due diligence and successful contract negations. Magnetar, CarVal Investors and Varde Partners will serve as bench managers for potential future funding if authorize by the Board at some future date. • Hire Ares Management and Audax Group each for $100 million allocations in mezzanine opportunistic credit mandates (and up to $25 million co-investment allocations for each), subject to final due diligence and successful contract negotiations. Blackstone (GSO) will serve as a bench manager for potential future funding if authorized by the Board at some future date. David Creighton made the motion to approve the hiring recommendations. Treasurer Fitzgerald seconded. Ayes: Lisa Stange, David Creighton, Treasurer Michael Fitzgerald, Justin Kirchhoff, Phyllis Peterson and Kris Rowley Nays: None Absent: Mike Duncan MOTION PASSED IPERS Staff Updates David Martin reviewed the member demand measures report for February 2021 and noted that member annual benefit statements will begin mailing on Monday, March 29. Shawna Lode reported on the 2021 Legislative session. 4 Public Comments Pat Deluhery inquired if IPERS was seeing an increase in member’s double dipping due to the COVID-19 pandemic. David Martin answered no and explained that double dipping is a term used to describe the act of receiving pension benefits while also accepting a salary, oftentimes from the same employer. Confirm Next Meeting Date The next regularly scheduled Investment Board meeting is Thursday, June 17, 2021, beginning at 8:30 a.m. Adjourn With no further business to come before the Investment Board, the meeting adjourned at 11:38 a.m. 5 June 8, 2021 MEMORANDUM TO: IPERS Investment Board Members FR: Greg Samorajski, CEO RE: Across-the-Board Salary Adjustment For fiscal years 2022 and 2023, Governor Reynolds authorized an across-the-board (ATB) salary increase of 1.10% for state of Iowa employees not covered by a collective bargaining agreement. However, for those directors whose salaries are set by a governing board other than the Governor, the salary adjustment must be approved by the appropriate governing body. The Investment Board sets the salary for IPERS’ chief executive officer, within the state of Iowa’s 000-pay plan, See §97B.3(1). Therefore, I request the Investment Board approve application of the Governor approved ATB to IPERS’ CEO position effective July 1, 2021 and July 1, 2022. 6 BETA REPORT IOWA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM PORTFOLIO PRELIMINARY (Unreconciled) MARKET VALUES AT 6/4/2021 Actual Overlay Total Policy Difference PUBLIC MARKETS Domestic $ 9,123,348,502 $ 24,041,758 $ 9,147,390,261 $ 9,115,877,138 $ 31, 513,123 International $ 7,317,002,737 $ 13,259,710 $ 7,330,262,447 $ 7,251,834,557 $ 78, 427,890 Global Smart Beta $ 2,516,301,492 $ 2,516,301,492 $ 2,489,560,225 $ 26, 741,267 Total Equities $ 18,956,652,731 $ 18,993,954,199 $ 18,857,271,920 $ 136, 682,280 Core Plus $ 10,520,464,615 $ 200,320,340 $ 10,720,784,955 $ 10,771,413,836 $ (50,628,882) Public Credit $ 1,632,052,707 $ 1,632,052,707 $ 1,655,536,699 $ (23,483,992) Cash $ 636,253,145 $ (237,621,808) $ 398,631,337 $ 412,841,645 $ (14,210,308) PRIVATE MARKETS $ 9,955,753,094 $ 9,955,753,094 $ 10,004,112,193 $ (48,359,098) Private Equity $ 6,702,415,020 $ 6,702,415,020 $ 6,734,739,971 $ (32,324,951) Private Credit $ 1,110,844,142 $ 1,110,844,142 $ 1,117,591,525 $ ( 6,747,383) Private Real Assets $ 2,142,493,933 $ 2,142,493,933 $ 2,151,780,697 $ ( 9,286,764) TOTAL FUND $ 41,701,176,293 $ 41,701,176,293 $ - Actual Overlay Total Policy Difference PUBLIC MARKETS Domestic 21.88% 0.06% 21.94% 21.86% 0.08% International 17.55% 0.03% 17.58% 17.39% 0.19% Global Smart Beta 6.03% 6.03% 5.97% 0.06% Total Equities 45.46% 45.55% 45.22% 0.33% Core Plus 25.23% 0.48% 25.71% 25.83% -0.12% Public Credit 3.91% 3.91% 3.97% -0.06% Cash 1.53% -0.57% 0.96% 0.99% -0.03% PRIVATE MARKETS 23.87% 23.87% 23.99% -0.12% Private Equity 16.07% 16.07% 16.15% -0.08% Private Credit 2.66% 2.66% 2.68% -0.02% Private Real Assets 5.14% 5.14% 5.16% -0.02% TOTAL FUND 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 7 BETA REPORT IOWA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM PORTFOLIO PRELIMINARY (Unreconciled) MARKET VALUES AT 6/4/2021 PUBLIC PORTFOLIO 76.13% $ 31,745,423,198 Manager % of Manager % of Manager Name Asset Class Total Market Value Manager Name Asset Class Total Market Value Blackrock R2000 SAE 2.88% $ 262,424,597 Western 16.45% $ 1,730,091,738 Blackrock - U.S.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Private Equity Program (PE Program)
    Attachment 3, Page 1 of 28 California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS) Private Equity Program (PE Program) Quarterly Report Executive Summary (As of December 31, 2012) Presentation Date: February 19, 2013 This report is solely for the use of CalPERS personnel. No part of it may be circulated, quoted or reproduced for distribution outside CalPERS without prior written approval from Pension Consulting Alliance, Inc. Nothing herein is intended to serve as investment advice, a recommendation of any particular investment or type of investment, a suggestion of the merits of purchasing or selling securities, or an invitation or inducement to engage in investment activity. Pension Consulting Alliance, Inc. Attachment 3, Page 2 of 28 Quarterly Report December 31, 2012 Table of Contents Section Tab Executive Summary 1 CalPERS’ Private Equity Program Performance Review 2 Private Equity Team Organizational Update 3 Private Equity Market Environment Overview 4 Appendices PE Program Relationships by Total Exposure Attachment 3, Page 3 of 28 Quarterly Report December 31, 2012 1.0 Introduction Private equity is a long-term asset class with performance results influenced by various factors. This report concentrates on several key exposures that contribute to performance results, including sector, geography, structure and vintage year. In addition, the broad industry trends highlighted herein may affect future performance results. 1.2 Highlights of Program Activity The PE Program outperformed the Policy Benchmark over the latest three-year period and posted an annual return above long-term return expectations as of December 31, 2012. However over the latest one, five, and ten-year periods, the PE Program underperformed the Policy Benchmark.
    [Show full text]
  • Copyrighted Material
    BINDEX 03/09/2012 18:54:54 Page 345 Index A SAS 111, 267 SAS 112, 267–268 Accountants, 92, 223–226 SAS 113, 268 Accredited investors, 16, 339 SAS 114, 269 Acquisition, 339 SAS 115, 270 Acquisition Premium, 339 American Jobs and Closing Tax Advisors, selection of, 91–92 Loopholes Act of 2010, 54 Akerlof, George, 48 American Research and American Accounting Association Development Corporation (AAA), 339 (ARD), 31 American Institute of Certified American waterfall model, 10 Public Accountants (AICPA), Angel investing, 20–21 339 Antitakeover provisions, 93 accounting and review standards, Antitrust legislation, federal 270–271 235–238 SSARS 10, 271 Celler-Kefauver Antimerger Act SSARS 12, 271 (1950), 237 auditing standards Clayton Antitrust Act (1914), SAS 1, 243 236 SAS 1 amendments, 257 Federal Trade Commission Act SAS 82, 249 (1914), 236–237 SAS 82 replacements, Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust 257–264 Improvement Act (1976), SAS 85 amendments, 257 140, 237–238 SAS 95, 249 Robinson-Patman Act (1936), SAS 99, 256–257 237 SAS 104,COPYRIGHTED 264 Sherman MATERIAL Antitrust Act (1890), SAS 105, 265 236 SAS 106, 265 Apollo Global Management, 53, 55 SAS 107, 265–266 Assessments, manufacturing, SAS 108, 266 319–333 SAS 109, 266 corporate vision and mission, SAS 110, 267 323–324 345 BINDEX 03/09/2012 18:54:54 Page 346 346 INDEX Assessments, manufacturing Breakup fee, 129–130, 339 (Continued) Bridge financing, 339 customer satisfaction and Broker-dealer, 339 perceived quality, 322–323 Bulge bracket bank, 74 employee satisfaction, 320–322 Business development companies equipment and facility (BDCs), 54 maintenance, 324–326 Business intelligence, 277–292, 339 inventory management and application to private equity, product flow, 327–328 291–292 operational data and cost of sales, exit strategy, 292 328 investment decision, 291 visual management, 326 portfolio companies, strategic Audit, scaling, 206 management of, 291 Auditing Standards.
    [Show full text]
  • Infinity Core Alternative Fund
    INFINITY CORE ALTERNATIVE FUND PROSPECTUS July 31, 2019 Infinity Core Alternative Fund (the “Fund”) is a Maryland statutory trust registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “Investment Company Act”), as a non-diversified, closed-end management investment company. The Fund operates under an Agreement and Declaration of Trust (“Declaration of Trust”) dated August 15, 2013 (the “Declaration of Trust”). Vivaldi Asset Management, LLC serves as the investment adviser (the “Investment Manager”) of the Fund. Infinity Capital Advisors, LLC serves as sub-adviser to the Fund (the “Sub-Adviser” and, together with the Investment Manager, the “Advisers”). Each of the Advisers is an investment adviser registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended. The investment objective of the Fund is to seek long-term capital growth. The Fund is a “fund of funds” that intends to invest primarily in general or limited partnerships, funds, corporations, trusts or other investment vehicles (collectively, “Investment Funds”) based primarily in the United States that invest or trade in a wide range of securities, and, to a lesser extent, other property and currency interests. The Fund may also make investments outside of Investment Funds to hedge exposures deemed too risky or to invest in strategies not employed by the Fund’s Investment Funds. Such investments could also be used to hedge a position in an Investment Fund that is locked-up or difficult to sell. Direct investments could include U.S. and foreign equity securities, debt securities, exchange-traded funds and derivatives related to such instruments, including futures and options thereon.
    [Show full text]
  • Venture Capital Postively Disrupts
    PRIVATE CLIENT SERIES VENTURE CAPITAL POSITIVELY DISRUPTS INTERGENERATIONAL INVESTING Families of wealth face three key questions about intergenerational wealth planning: how best to invest to sustain future generations; how best to engage the next genera- tion; and how best to ensure family unity endures. Often each question is addressed independently. We find that a conversation across generations about the impact of a meaningful venture capital (VC) allocation can help address all three questions in an integrated manner. Venture capital offers the potential for attractive returns relative to public equity markets, often in a tax-advantaged manner, thus allowing the portfolio to generate more wealth to support current and future generations. Bringing the next generation into the conversation about the changing investing landscape also offers the oppor- tunity for both generations to learn about the unique aspects of VC investing and the critical role it can play in the family’s portfolio. Furthermore, the vast potential that exists for making lasting impact through VC, both in terms of financial returns and contributions to society, may provide unifying experiences across generations. For many families, venture investing may provide a connection to the original roots of entrepreneurship that created the family wealth. As VC spurs continued innovation and industry disruption, families should consider the potential positive disruption the inclusion of VC can bring to their intergenerational investment plans. This paper provides some context for considering such an inclusion by discussing the investment potential and implications for interested investors. Venture, the source of future returns Whether it be cloud computing, machine learning, or artificial intelligence, emerging technologies are transforming many industries.
    [Show full text]
  • Quality Driven Growth: an Enduring Combination
    Investment Focus Quality-Driven Growth: An Enduring Combination Over the past several years, market observers and participants have focused to the point of obsession on the performance and possible trajectories of growth and value stocks. In our view, however, the quiet, steady dominance of a third style makes the debate beside the point. International quality stocks have consistently outperformed their regional growth and value peers for the last two decades. Quality-driven growth investing has been an enduring combination. Done properly, we believe it has the potential to identify companies across many sectors and industries with high levels of financial productivity, lasting competitive advantages, and reinvestment opportunities for growth. Collectively, we believe companies with these characteristics can deliver a consistent pattern of performance through different investment cycles. 2 Introduction market environments, with the notable exception of very strong rising markets, which tend to favor value stocks. When comparing against Study after study has shown that investors are not very good at timing growth, the MSCI ACWI ex-USA Quality Index has outperformed the market, but the conversation around style investing shows that its counterpart Growth Index in 96% of the three-year periods when they nevertheless spend an awful lot of time trying to do it. As growth growth was underperforming and 74% of the periods when it was stocks soared over the last decade-plus, pundits asked whether the outperforming. world had permanently shifted to favor high-growth technology stocks over businesses heavy on assets in the physical world, which often fall in the value category. But even very short periods in which value Exhibit 1 started to pull ahead elicited a frenzy of speculation about whether the Quality Outperformed International and US Benchmarks for valuations of growth stocks, many of which are not very profitable, the Last 20 Years had finally flown too close to the sun.
    [Show full text]
  • Agenda Item 5B
    Item 5b - Attachment 3, Page 1 of 45 SEMI - ANNUAL PERFORMANCE R EPORT California Public Employees’ Retirement System Private Equity Program Semi-Annual Report – June 30, 2017 MEKETA INVESTMENT GROUP B OSTON C HICAGO M IAMI P ORTLAND S AN D IEGO L ONDON M ASSACHUSETTS I LLINOIS F LORIDA O REGON C ALIFORNIA U N I T E D K INGDOM www.meketagroup.com Item 5b - Attachment 3, Page 2 of 45 California Public Employees’ Retirement System Private Equity Program Table of Contents 1. Introduction and Executive Summary 2. Private Equity Industry Review 3. Portfolio Overview 4. Program Performance 5. Program Activity 6. Appendix Vintage Year Statistics Glossary Prepared by Meketa Investment Group Page 2 of 45 Item 5b - Attachment 3, Page 3 of 45 California Public Employees’ Retirement System Private Equity Program Introduction Overview This report provides a review of CalPERS Private Equity Program as of June 30, 2017, and includes a review and outlook for the Private Equity industry. CalPERS began investing in the private equity asset class in 1990. CalPERS currently has an 8% interim target allocation to the private equity asset class. As of June 30, 2017, CalPERS had 298 investments in the Active Portfolio, and 319 investments in the Exited Portfolio1. The total value of the portfolio was $25.9 billion2, with total exposure (net asset value plus unfunded commitments) of $40.2 billion3. Executive Summary Portfolio The portfolio is diversified by strategy, with Buyouts representing the largest exposure at 66% of total Private Equity. Mega and Large buyout funds represent approximately 57% of CalPERS’ Buyouts exposure.
    [Show full text]
  • Private Equity
    Private Equity: Accomplishments and Challenges by Greg Brown, University of North Carolina; Bob Harris, University of Virginia; Steve Kaplan, University of Chicago; Tim Jenkinson, University of Oxford; and David Robinson, Duke University ince the 1980s, there has been an ongoing discussion about the role of private S equity (PE) in the economy. As investors have flocked to the asset class, voices critical of the negative social impact of PE have grown louder. In this article, we examine what is known from the academic literature about the effects of private equity on corporate productivity, the returns for investors, and possible broader economic and social consequences. We catalogue what we believe to be strong evidence of the overall benefits of PE-backed companies and investors in private equity, as well as spillovers in the form of broader gains in economic productivity. We also describe apparent instances of PE shortcomings in some specific industries where negative social impacts can be measured in some way. In our view, private equity is “capitalism in high gear” and, Back to the 1980s as such, subject to most of the same debates concerning Our account of private equity begins at the end of the 1980s, economic and social conditions in a free enterprise system. when hostile takeovers and other often highly leveraged While some argue that the 2020 version of capitalism transactions, including a relative newcomer called the lever- (as practiced in the U.S. and much of the world) is inef- aged buyout (or LBO), came under fierce attack in both the fective in coping with current social needs, much of the press and conventional business circles.
    [Show full text]
  • To Read Mary Starkeys Article from the June Issue of Family Office Monthly
    (212) 729-5067 FAMILY OFFICE MONTHLY June 2015 Upcoming Family Office Conferences in 2015 Family Office CIO Summit elcome to the June edition of Family Office Monthly. We have compiled a number of August 6th, NYC Wgreat articles for this month’s edition. We are preparing for the August conference series, with the Family Office CIO Summit and Real Estate Allocator Summit being held on August th6 th and 7 , respectively. Real Estate Beyond the events, we hope you access our extensive family office resources such asFamily Allocator Summit Office Monthly, database solutions, family office training programs, webinars, and more. If you th would like to learn more about how we can work with you and your family office, please contact August 7 , NYC our client services specialists at [email protected] and by phone (212) 729-5067. Family Office Chasing the Blood in the Streets The Business of Private Service Super Summit It has been interesting to watch institutional Administratively, I had never thought of December 1st & 2nd, and family office investors’ reactions to the myself as particularly skilled. I was indeed an sharp drop in oil prices this year. This has entrepreneur, and had a very clear vision of Miami served as another reminder to me of how what I was to accomplish, but the administra- important it is for investors to look around at tive ... Page 6 what their peers are investing in... Page 2 Family Offices Advocate Clean- Thyssen Family Office Acquires Tech to White House Reserve your seat today Majority stake in Petrolvalves The wealthy individuals and families that back www.WilsonConferences.com TBG Holdings, a family office investment ve- the world’s family offices are often capturing hicle linked to the Thyssen-Bornemiza family, headlines but it is rare to see several family has inked a deal to acquire the Italian valve offices uniting to publicly advocate a position.
    [Show full text]
  • PGIM Jennison Mid-Cap Growth Fund
    Fact sheet | June 30, 2021 Vanguard® PGIM Jennison Mid-Cap Growth Fund Domestic stock fund | Class Z Fund facts †Risk level Total net ‡Gross expense §Net expense Ticker Turnover Inception Fund Low High assets as of 10/30/20 as of 10/30/20 symbol rate date number 1 2 3 4 5 $832 MM 0.74% 0.74% PEGZX 58.00% 12/31/96 3198 Investment objective Benchmark The investment seeks long-term capital Russell Mid Cap Growth TR USD appreciation. Annual returns Investment strategy The fund normally invests at least 80% of its investable assets in equity and equity-related securities of medium-sized companies with the potential for above-average growth. The fund’s investable assets will be less than its total assets to the extent that it has borrowed money Annual returns 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 for non-investment purposes, such as to meet Fund 2.42 16.24 28.08 9.45 -2.40 4.12 22.67 -8.22 37.52 42.71 anticipated redemptions. Benchmark -1.65 15.81 35.74 11.90 -0.20 7.33 25.27 -4.75 35.47 35.59 General note Total returns An additional recordkeeping or administrative fee may Periods ended June 30, 2021 be charged to participants investing plan assets in the fund. The recordkeeping fee will be deducted directly Total returns Quarter Year to date One year Three years Five years Ten years from participants’ accounts. Please log on to your employer plans at Vanguard.com, or contact Fund 7.16% 8.33% 48.79% 23.70% 19.88% 14.00% Participant Services at 1-800-523-1188, prior to Benchmark 11.07% 10.44% 43.77% 22.39% 20.52% 15.13% investing, for additional fee information.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Gadflies: Applications and Implications of U.S.- Style Corporate Governance Abroad
    NYLS Journal of International and Comparative Law Volume 17 Number 2 THE SIXTH ANNUAL ERNST C. Article 28 STIEFEL SYMPOSIUM 1997 GLOBAL GADFLIES: APPLICATIONS AND IMPLICATIONS OF U.S.- STYLE CORPORATE GOVERNANCE ABROAD Mary E. Kissane Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.nyls.edu/ journal_of_international_and_comparative_law Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Kissane, Mary E. (1997) "GLOBAL GADFLIES: APPLICATIONS AND IMPLICATIONS OF U.S.-STYLE CORPORATE GOVERNANCE ABROAD," NYLS Journal of International and Comparative Law: Vol. 17 : No. 2 , Article 28. Available at: https://digitalcommons.nyls.edu/journal_of_international_and_comparative_law/vol17/iss2/ 28 This Notes and Comments is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@NYLS. It has been accepted for inclusion in NYLS Journal of International and Comparative Law by an authorized editor of DigitalCommons@NYLS. GLOBAL GADFLIES: APPLICATIONS AND IMPLICATIONS OF U.S.-STYLE CORPORATE GOVERNANCE ABROAD I. INTRODUCTION Over the past decade, international business participants have come to recognize that the structure of corporate governance' is more than a local custom to be accepted by default.2 Rather, such local structures are increasingly recognized as substantive factors affecting the relative desirability of particular markets.3 The Organization for Economic Co- operation and Development (OECD), a major international economic think- tank, has commented, "given the important institutional differences among countries concerning the corporate governance structure, some differences in the cost of capital are likely to persist in the future."4 The cost of capital is, of course, a major factor affecting a given markets' appeal to investors.' Competition to liberalize markets in order to attract foreign investors is the "most important policy trend of the 1990s for international investment."6 However, "the greater freedom this gives 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Approved Panel of Providers
    BROOKLIGHT PLACE SECURITIES, INC. 16930 E Palisades Blvd. Suite #100-D Fountain Hills, AZ 85268 Toll Free: 1-888-976-0659 Member FINRA & SIPC Approved Panel of Providers For representative use only – Updated January 22, 2019 Mutual Funds First Eagle Funds PGIM Investments AIG Funds Firsthand Funds PIMCO Funds Alger Franklin Templeton Investments Pacific Funds AllianceBernstein Goldman Sachs Funds Principal Funds Allianz Global Investor Hartford Funds ProFunds American Century Investments Heartland Advisors Putnam Investments American Funds Highmark Funds (Pyxis) Pyxis Funds AMG Funds ICON Funds Royce Funds Amundi Pioneer Asset Management Invesco Salient Funds Aquila Group of Funds Ivy Funds (Waddell & Reed) Sammons Retirement Solutions LiveWell Ariel Investments Janus Funds Selected Funds Blackrock Funds John Hancock Investments SunAmerica Funds Calamos Investments JP Morgan Funds Thornburg Investment Management Calvert Funds Keeley Funds Timothy Plan Mutual Funds Colorado Bond Shares Legg Mason Mutual Funds T. Rowe Price Columbia Threadneedle Investments Lord Abbett Mutual Funds Touchstone Investments Davis Funds MFS Funds Transamerica (IDEX) Funds Delaware Funds by Macquarie Nationwide Funds Van Eck Funds Dodge & Cox Natixis Funds Vanguard Dreyfus Family of Funds NewYork Life Investments – MainStay Funds Victory Funds Deutsche Asset Management (DWS) New Alternatives Fund Virtus Investment Partners Eagle Asset Management Nuveen a TIAA company Voya Funds Eaton Vance OakRidge Investments Voya Select Advantage Federated Oppenheimer Funds
    [Show full text]
  • Private Equity Holdings Disclosure 06-30-2019
    The Regents of the University of California Private Equity Investments as of June 30, 2019 (1) Capital Paid-in Capital Current Market Capital Distributed Total Value Total Value Description Vintage Year (2) Net IRR (3) Committed (A) Value (B) (C) (B+C) Multiple (B+C)/A) Brentwood Associates Private Equity II 1979 3,000,000 3,000,000 - 4,253,768 4,253,768 1.42 5.5% Interwest Partners I 1979 3,000,000 3,000,000 - 6,681,033 6,681,033 2.23 18.6% Alta Co Partners 1980 3,000,000 3,000,000 - 6,655,008 6,655,008 2.22 13.6% Golder, Thoma, Cressey & Rauner Fund 1980 5,000,000 5,000,000 - 59,348,988 59,348,988 11.87 30.5% KPCB Private Equity (Legacy Funds) (4) Multiple 142,535,631 143,035,469 3,955,643 1,138,738,611 1,142,694,253 7.99 39.4% WCAS Capital Partners II 1980 4,000,000 4,000,000 - 8,669,738 8,669,738 2.17 14.0% Brentwood Associates Private Equity III 1981 3,000,000 3,000,000 - 2,943,142 2,943,142 0.98 -0.2% Mayfield IV 1981 5,000,000 5,000,000 - 13,157,658 13,157,658 2.63 26.0% Sequoia Private Equity (Legacy Funds) (4) Multiple 293,200,000 352,355,566 167,545,013 1,031,217,733 1,198,762,746 3.40 30.8% Alta II 1982 3,000,000 3,000,000 - 5,299,578 5,299,578 1.77 7.0% Interwest Partners II 1982 4,008,769 4,008,769 - 6,972,484 6,972,484 1.74 8.4% T V I Fund II 1982 4,000,000 4,000,000 - 6,744,334 6,744,334 1.69 9.3% Brentwood Associates Private Equity IV 1983 5,000,000 5,000,000 - 10,863,119 10,863,119 2.17 10.9% WCAS Capital Partners III 1983 5,000,000 5,000,000 - 9,066,954 9,066,954 1.81 8.5% Golder, Thoma, Cressey & Rauner Fund II 1984
    [Show full text]