Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug Sensitizes Mycobacterium

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug Sensitizes Mycobacterium Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug sensitizes Mycobacterium tuberculosis to endogenous and exogenous antimicrobials Ben Golda, Maneesh Pinglea, Steven J. Bricknerb, Nilesh Shahc, Julia Robertsa, Mark Rundella, W. Clay Brackend, Thulasi Warriera, Selin Somersane, Aditya Venugopala, Crystal Darbya, Xiuju Jianga, J. David Warrend,f, Joseph Fernandezg, Ouathek Ouerfellic, Eric L. Nuermbergerh, Amy Cunningham-Bussela, Poonam Ratha, Tamutenda Chidawanyikaa, Haiteng Dengg, Ronald Realubiti, J. Fraser Glickmani, and Carl F. Nathana,1 Departments of aMicrobiology and Immunology, dBiochemistry, and eMedicine, and fMilstein Chemistry Core Facility, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY 10065; bS. J. Brickner Consulting, LLC, Ledyard, CT 06339; cOrganic Synthesis Core, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065; hDepartment of Medicine, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD 21287; and gProteomics Resource Center and iHigh-Throughput Screening Resource Center, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY 10065 This contribution is part of the special series of Inaugural Articles by members of the National Academy of Sciences elected in 2011. Contributed by Carl F. Nathan, August 17, 2012 (sent for review May 29, 2012) Existing drugs are slow to eradicate Mycobacterium tuberculosis replicating (R) Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) (4). Mtb can (Mtb) in patients and have failed to control tuberculosis globally. occupy diverse microenvironments in the host. Evidence from One reason may be that host conditions impair Mtb’s replication, auxotrophs, analyses of gene expression, and direct and indirect reducing its sensitivity to most antiinfectives. We devised a high- biochemical measurements in vivo or ex vivo in experimental throughput screen for compounds that kill Mtb when its replica- animals and people suggest that such environments expose Mtb tion has been halted by reactive nitrogen intermediates (RNIs), to acid, hypoxia, reactive nitrogen intermediates (RNIs), oxida- acid, hypoxia, and a fatty acid carbon source. At concentrations tive stress, carbohydrate deficiency, and metal starvation or in- routinely achieved in human blood, oxyphenbutazone (OPB), an toxication, and require Mtb to metabolize fatty acids or cholesterol inexpensive anti-inflammatory drug, was selectively mycobacterici- (5–17). In vitro, many of the same conditions can make Mtb dal to nonreplicating (NR) Mtb. Its cidal activity depended on mild relatively refractory to killing by the standard agents, except for acid and was augmented by RNIs and fatty acid. Acid and RNIs pyrazinamide, which is only effective at a low pH. fostered OPB’s 4-hydroxylation. The resultant 4-butyl-4-hydroxy-1- Thus, there is a need for a high-throughput screen (HTS) for (4-hydroxyphenyl)-2-phenylpyrazolidine-3,5-dione (4-OH-OPB) killed compounds that kill Mtb when the Mtb has been rendered NR both replicating and NR Mtb, including Mtb resistant to standard by a combination of physiologically relevant host-imposed con- drugs. 4-OH-OPB depleted flavins and formed covalent adducts with ditions. We were encouraged to devise such a screen by recent N-acetyl-cysteine and mycothiol. 4-OH-OPB killed Mtb synergistically discoveries of a class of compounds that kill Mtb only when it is with oxidants and several antituberculosis drugs. Thus, conditions NR (18), an antibiotic in clinical use for other infections that kills that block Mtb’s replication modify OPB and enhance its cidal action. NR Mtb better than R Mtb (19), and a compound that kills NR Modified OPB kills both replicating and NR Mtb and sensitizes both and R Mtb equally well (20). Unfortunately, only one of those to host-derived and medicinal antimycobacterial agents. compounds is an approved drug, and even if it were of proven utility in TB, its price would preclude its use by most of those ome bacterial infections can be cured with a single dose of an who need it. We decided to screen other existing drugs that are Santibiotic, and most others can be cured with administration not regarded as antiinfectives for those that kill NR Mtb. Here, of one drug over several days or weeks. In contrast, routine we report finding such a drug in an HTS that combined four host- treatment of drug-sensitive tuberculosis (TB) takes 2 mo of therapy imposed conditions, some of which converted the drug into a form with four drugs and an additional 4 mo with two drugs to reduce active on both R and NR Mtb. the 2-y relapse rate below 5%. The difficulty of completing pro- longed treatment is a major reason for emergence of drug re- Results sistance. When the infecting strain is resistant to isoniazid and Screen for Compounds That Kill NR Mtb, R Mtb, or Both. We set out rifampin, the two drugs recommended for all 6 mo of treatment, to identify drugs that can kill Mtb in the face of replication- fi cure often requires 2 y of daily administration of toxic, expensive, inhibiting conditions. HTSs depend on robots that are dif cult second-line agents that are often unavailable at the point of care. to accommodate in the biological safety level (BSL) 3 conditions When the causative strain is additionally resistant to a quinolone required for work with pathogenic strains of Mtb. We took ad- 2 Δ Δ and an aminoglycoside, the resultant “extensively drug-resistant” vantage of mc 6220, a panCD lysA double-auxotrophic strain of TB was fatal to 80% of patients in a leading center (1), although Mtb H37Rv (a kind gift of W. Jacobs, Jr., Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York), which has been found to cause no dis- complex multidrug regimens have achieved higher cure rates in fi populations not previously exposed to the additional drugs (2). ease when injected into immunocompetent or immunode cient In addition to sharing air with someone with TB, leading risk factors for contracting the disease are malnutrition, HIV infection, fi Author contributions: B.G. and C.F.N. designed research; B.G., M.P., J.R., M.R., W.C.B., diabetes, and exposure to smoke from cigarettes or cooking res T.W., S.S., A.V., C.D., X.J., J.D.W., J.F., E.L.N., A.C.-B., P.R., T.C., H.D., and R.R. performed (3). These epidemiological challenges exacerbate problems of in- research; N.S. and O.O. contributed new reagents/analytic tools; B.G., M.P., S.J.B., W.C.B., adequate diagnostic technology and limited access to drug sus- J.F., H.D., J.F.G., and C.F.N. analyzed data; and B.G. and C.F.N. wrote the paper. ceptibility testing and to drugs. Control of the pandemic is not in The authors declare no conflict of interest. sight (3). Freely available online through the PNAS open access option. It is widely hypothesized that treatment of TB is protracted 1To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: [email protected]. because nonreplicating (NR) subpopulations of bacilli are phe- This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10. notypically tolerant to drugs that were selected for activity against 1073/pnas.1214188109/-/DCSupplemental. 16004–16011 | PNAS | October 2, 2012 | vol. 109 | no. 40 www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1214188109 Downloaded by guest on October 2, 2021 mice, guinea pigs, or monkeys (21, 22). This strain has been not at up to 200 μM when tested against R Mtb in liquid cultures deemed to be safe for use in BSL2 laboratories by the Institutional (Fig. 1A). The closely related pyrazolidinediones phenylbutazone INAUGURAL ARTICLE Biosafety Committees of the Albert Einstein College of Medicine (PB), suxibuzone, and sulfinpyrazone (Fig. 1B) did not kill either and Weill Cornell Medical College, as approved by the US Na- NR or R Mtb (Fig. 1A). Results using OD as a read-out were tional Institutes of Health. Provision of pantothenate and lysine confirmed by cfu assays with pure, resupplied OPB (Fig. 1 C and D). allows the auxotroph to grow like WT in vitro. The HTS under R Killing by OPB was concentration-dependent, time-dependent, conditions identified 24 actives that have known anti-Mtb activity; and extensive against both the auxotrophic strain (Fig. 1 C and minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined for D)andWTMtb(Fig. S1B). In contrast, neither OPB nor 11 and were similar when tested against WT Mtb and the PB was bactericidal to Escherichia coli, Salmonella enterica var. auxotroph (Table S1), validating use of the auxotroph. Typhimurium, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus au- It is a challenge to detect compounds that kill NR Mtb when reus,orCandida albicans up to 100 μM, nor was OPB cytotoxic the criterion for death is inability to replicate. We solved this to monkey kidney epithelial (Vero) cells or murine bone problem by conducting the assay in two stages. In the first stage, marrow-derived macrophages at 200 μM. we halted Mtb’s replication by incubation in 96- or 384-well Next, we determined the individual contributions of the con- microplates in modified Sauton’s minimal medium at pH 5.5 in ditions used to prevent Mtb from replication. At pH 7, OPB was 1% O2 and 5% CO2 with 50 μM butyrate or isobutyrate as the inactive in the presence or absence of butyrate or nitrite with either sole carbon source in the presence of 0.5 mM nitrite. These 1% or 21% O2. OPB’s mycobactericidal potency was markedly conditions prevented growth yet led to little or no decline in cfu increased as the pH was lowered from 5.5 to 4.5 (Fig. 2A), the over 6 d (Fig. S1A). We exposed Mtb to test compounds at 12.5 μM level in the phagosome of activated macrophages (8). OPB’s for 6 d and then diluted the contents of each well 21-fold into mycobactericidal activity was modestly enhanced by nitrite, but Middlebrook 7H9 medium containing dextrose and glycerol as even though decreasing the pH enhances the rate of RNI pro- carbon sources at pH 6.6 in 21% O2 and 5% CO2 without nitrite, duction from nitrite, activity became largely nitrite-independent conditions that support Mtb’s exponential replication.
Recommended publications
  • The Role of Nanobiosensors in Therapeutic Drug Monitoring
    Journal of Personalized Medicine Review Personalized Medicine for Antibiotics: The Role of Nanobiosensors in Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Vivian Garzón 1, Rosa-Helena Bustos 2 and Daniel G. Pinacho 2,* 1 PhD Biosciences Program, Universidad de La Sabana, Chía 140013, Colombia; [email protected] 2 Therapeutical Evidence Group, Clinical Pharmacology, Universidad de La Sabana, Chía 140013, Colombia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +57-1-8615555 (ext. 23309) Received: 21 August 2020; Accepted: 7 September 2020; Published: 25 September 2020 Abstract: Due to the high bacterial resistance to antibiotics (AB), it has become necessary to adjust the dose aimed at personalized medicine by means of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). TDM is a fundamental tool for measuring the concentration of drugs that have a limited or highly toxic dose in different body fluids, such as blood, plasma, serum, and urine, among others. Using different techniques that allow for the pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) analysis of the drug, TDM can reduce the risks inherent in treatment. Among these techniques, nanotechnology focused on biosensors, which are relevant due to their versatility, sensitivity, specificity, and low cost. They provide results in real time, using an element for biological recognition coupled to a signal transducer. This review describes recent advances in the quantification of AB using biosensors with a focus on TDM as a fundamental aspect of personalized medicine. Keywords: biosensors; therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), antibiotic; personalized medicine 1. Introduction The discovery of antibiotics (AB) ushered in a new era of progress in controlling bacterial infections in human health, agriculture, and livestock [1] However, the use of AB has been challenged due to the appearance of multi-resistant bacteria (MDR), which have increased significantly in recent years due to AB mismanagement and have become a global public health problem [2].
    [Show full text]
  • Topical Budesonide for Treating Giant Rectal Pseudopolyposis
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH 25: 2961-2964 (2005) Topical Budesonide for Treating Giant Rectal Pseudopolyposis CHARALAMPOS PILICHOS1, ATHENA PREZA1, MARIA DEMONAKOU2, DIMITRIOS KAPATSORIS1 and CONSTANTINOS BOURAS1 1First Department of Internal Medicine and 2Department of Pathology, Sismanogleion Hospital, Athens, Greece Abstract. Pseudopolyps are a frequent finding in the course of Case Report inflammatory bowel disease. They are non-neoplastic lesions resulting from a regenerative and healing process that leaves A 45-year-old male patient was admitted to our service in July inflamed colonic mucosa in polypoid configuration. Data about 2002 for acute rectal bleeding. All laboratory tests were their management is lacking. "Giant" pseudopolyps can be normal, except an increase of aminotransferases level (>10 N) mistaken for adenocarcinomas and, as they rarely regress with and a serological profile consistent with acute hepatitis B or a medical management alone, a surgical resection is often required. flare of chronic hepatitis B (HbsAg +, HbsAb –, HbeAg –, A case of giant pseudopolyposis treated non-surgically, in a patient HbeAb +, HbcAb-IgM +). The patient underwent lower with concomitant ulcerative colitis and chronic hepatitis B, is gastro-intestinal endoscopy and multiple biopsies were taken reported, representing a co-morbidity complicating an eventual from a bulky rectal mass lesion (Figure 1). Histological study conservative treatment. The clinical implementation of topical revealed alterations compatible with inflammatory bowel budesonide was originally tested, resulting in clinical, endoscopic disease (IBD) with no dysplasia (Figure 2). Because of the and histological remission. Budesonide seems a promising therapy atypical macroscopic features and the high suspicion of rectal for IBD, particularly when a comorbidity with viral hepatitis exist.
    [Show full text]
  • Practice Parameters for the Surgical Treatment of Ulcerative Colitis Howard Ross, M.D
    PRACTICE PARAMETERS Practice Parameters for the Surgical Treatment of Ulcerative Colitis Howard Ross, M.D. • Scott R. Steele, M.D. • Mika Varma, M.D. • Sharon Dykes, M.D. Robert Cima, M.D. • W. Donald Buie, M.D. • Janice Rafferty, M.D. Prepared by the Standards Practice Task Force of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons he American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons the most common surgical indication for UC. Whether is dedicated to assuring high-quality patient care it is secondary to an inability to control symptoms, poor Tby advancing the science, prevention, and manage- quality of life, risks/side effects of chronic medical therapy ment of disorders and diseases of the colon, rectum, and (especially long-term corticosteroids), noncompliance, or anus. The Standards Committee is composed of Society growth failure, patients may opt for surgery in the elective members who are chosen because they have demonstrat- or semielective setting.3 Complete removal of all the poten- ed expertise in the specialty of colon and rectal surgery. tial disease-bearing tissue is theoretically curative in UC. This Committee was created to lead international efforts Operative options include an abdominal colectomy or total in defining quality care for conditions related to the co- proctocolectomy with either a permanent end ileostomy or lon, rectum, and anus. This is accompanied by develop- surgical construction of a “new” rectum through an IPAA ing Clinical Practice Guidelines based on the best available that restores GI continuity.4,5 All these procedures may evidence. These guidelines are inclusive, and not prescrip- be performed by using open or minimally invasive tech- tive.
    [Show full text]
  • Nitrofurazone
    PATIENT INFORMATION SHEET Nitrofurazone (N-005) Your patch testing results indicate that you have a contact allergy to Nitrofurazone . It is important that you familiarize yourself with this chemical and take steps to avoid coming in contact with it. i What is Nitrofurazone and where is it found? This chemical is used as a topical bactericide for surface infections. If is also used in anti ‐infective therapy for second and third degree burns and in skin grafting. It is also an antibacterial agent for the treatment or prevention of infections in a variety of conditions involving skin, eyes, ears, nose and genitourinary tract. It is used on pyodermas, ulcers and wounds. Further research may identify additional product or industrial usages of this chemical. i What else is Nitrofurazone called? This chemical can be identified by different names, including: 2‐[(5 ‐Nitro ‐2‐furanyl)methylene]‐hydrazinecarboxamide 5‐nitro ‐2‐furfuraldehyde semicarbazone (5 ‐nitro ‐2‐furfurylideneamino)urea 5‐nitrofurfural semicarbazone 5‐Nitro ‐2‐furaldehyde Semicarbazone 6‐nitrofuraldehyde semicarbazide 5‐nitrofuraldehyde semicarbazide NF 5‐nitrofuran ‐2‐aldehyde semicarbazone NF ‐7 5‐nitro ‐2‐furancarboxaldehyde semicarbazone NFS This may not be a complete list as manufacturers introduce and delete chemicals from their product lines. THINGS YOU CAN DO TO HELP MANAGE YOUR CONTACT ALLERGY Be vigilant read the product label. Always take the time to read the ingredient listing on product packages. This should be your first step each time you purchase a product as manufacturers sometimes change product ingredients. If you have any concerns ask your pharmacist or your doctor. Test the product first.
    [Show full text]
  • Against the Plasmodium Falciparum Apicoplast
    A Systematic In Silico Search for Target Similarity Identifies Several Approved Drugs with Potential Activity against the Plasmodium falciparum Apicoplast Nadlla Alves Bispo1, Richard Culleton2, Lourival Almeida Silva1, Pedro Cravo1,3* 1 Instituto de Patologia Tropical e Sau´de Pu´blica/Universidade Federal de Goia´s/Goiaˆnia, Brazil, 2 Malaria Unit/Institute of Tropical Medicine (NEKKEN)/Nagasaki University/ Nagasaki, Japan, 3 Centro de Mala´ria e Doenc¸as Tropicais.LA/IHMT/Universidade Nova de Lisboa/Lisboa, Portugal Abstract Most of the drugs in use against Plasmodium falciparum share similar modes of action and, consequently, there is a need to identify alternative potential drug targets. Here, we focus on the apicoplast, a malarial plastid-like organelle of algal source which evolved through secondary endosymbiosis. We undertake a systematic in silico target-based identification approach for detecting drugs already approved for clinical use in humans that may be able to interfere with the P. falciparum apicoplast. The P. falciparum genome database GeneDB was used to compile a list of <600 proteins containing apicoplast signal peptides. Each of these proteins was treated as a potential drug target and its predicted sequence was used to interrogate three different freely available databases (Therapeutic Target Database, DrugBank and STITCH3.1) that provide synoptic data on drugs and their primary or putative drug targets. We were able to identify several drugs that are expected to interact with forty-seven (47) peptides predicted to be involved in the biology of the P. falciparum apicoplast. Fifteen (15) of these putative targets are predicted to have affinity to drugs that are already approved for clinical use but have never been evaluated against malaria parasites.
    [Show full text]
  • Gene-Drug Interactions and the Evolution of Antibiotic Resistance
    Gene-Drug Interactions and the Evolution of Antibiotic Resistance The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Palmer, Adam Christopher. 2012. Gene-Drug Interactions and the Evolution of Antibiotic Resistance. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University. Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:10436292 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA © - Adam Christopher Palmer All rights reserved. Professor Roy Kishony Adam Christopher Palmer Gene-drug interactions and the evolution of antibiotic resistance Abstract The evolution of antibiotic resistance is shaped by interactions between genes, the chemical environment, and an antibiotic's mechanism of action. This thesis explores these interactions with experiments, theory, and analysis, seeking a mechanistic understanding of how different interactions between genes and drugs can enhance or constrain the evolution of antibiotic resistance. Chapter 1 investigates the effects of the chemical decay of an antibiotic. Tetracycline resistant and sensitive bacteria were grown competitively in the presence of tetracycline and its decay products. Antibiotic decay did not only remove selection for resistance, but long- lived decay products favored tetracycline sensitivity by inducing costly drug efflux pumps in the resistant strain. Selection against resistance by antibiotic-related compounds may contribute to the coexistence of drug-sensitive and resistant bacteria in nature. Chapter 2 investigates how genetic interactions can favor particular combinations of resistance-conferring mutations.
    [Show full text]
  • 8-GI Drugs Final
    Gastrointestinal Drugs Subcommittee: Prozialeck, Walter (Chair) [email protected] Escher, Emanuel [email protected] Garrison, James C. [email protected] Henry, Matthew, [email protected] Weber, Donna R [email protected] Recommended Curriculum Equivalent: 1.5 h Acid Reducers and Drugs for the Treatment of Peptic Ulcer Disease Proton pump inhibitors First generation Second generation OMEPRAZOLE ESOMEPRAZOLE LANSOPRAZOLE PANTOPRAZOLE RABEPRAZOLE Learning Objectives Physiology and pathophysiology Describe the synthesis and mechanism of H+ secretion by the parietal cells Mechanism of action Describe the mechanism of action of proton pump inhibitors and why they are selective for the parietal cell proton pump. Actions on organ systems Describe the pharmacological effects of the drugs on gastric function. Are there effects on other organ systems? Pharmacokinetics Describe the pharmacokinetics of proton pump inhibitors? Are there significant differences among the different drugs in this class? Adverse effects, drug interactions and contraindications Describe the principal adverse effects of proton pump inhibitors. Describe the clinically important drug interactions of proton pump inhibitors. Describe the principal contraindications of proton pump inhibitors. Therapeutic uses Describe the current therapeutic uses of proton pump inhibitors. 1 Clinical Pharmacology Omeprazole is perceived to be the most potent of this drug class in inhibiting CYP2C19 activity and is proposed to have potential drug interactions with other drugs metabolized by this P450 isoform. Concern has been raised about potential inhibition of clopidogrel activation in patients taking both drugs concurrently. Current consensus is that in such patients clopidogrel with pantoprazole may be a safer choice to reduce the probability of a drug interaction involving CYP2C19.
    [Show full text]
  • Malta Medicines List April 08
    Defined Daily Doses Pharmacological Dispensing Active Ingredients Trade Name Dosage strength Dosage form ATC Code Comments (WHO) Classification Class Glucobay 50 50mg Alpha Glucosidase Inhibitor - Blood Acarbose Tablet 300mg A10BF01 PoM Glucose Lowering Glucobay 100 100mg Medicine Rantudil® Forte 60mg Capsule hard Anti-inflammatory and Acemetacine 0.12g anti rheumatic, non M01AB11 PoM steroidal Rantudil® Retard 90mg Slow release capsule Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitor - Acetazolamide Diamox 250mg Tablet 750mg S01EC01 PoM Antiglaucoma Preparation Parasympatho- Powder and solvent for solution for mimetic - Acetylcholine Chloride Miovisin® 10mg/ml Refer to PIL S01EB09 PoM eye irrigation Antiglaucoma Preparation Acetylcysteine 200mg/ml Concentrate for solution for Acetylcysteine 200mg/ml Refer to PIL Antidote PoM Injection injection V03AB23 Zovirax™ Suspension 200mg/5ml Oral suspension Aciclovir Medovir 200 200mg Tablet Virucid 200 Zovirax® 200mg Dispersible film-coated tablets 4g Antiviral J05AB01 PoM Zovirax® 800mg Aciclovir Medovir 800 800mg Tablet Aciclovir Virucid 800 Virucid 400 400mg Tablet Aciclovir Merck 250mg Powder for solution for inj Immunovir® Zovirax® Cream PoM PoM Numark Cold Sore Cream 5% w/w (5g/100g)Cream Refer to PIL Antiviral D06BB03 Vitasorb Cold Sore OTC Cream Medovir PoM Neotigason® 10mg Acitretin Capsule 35mg Retinoid - Antipsoriatic D05BB02 PoM Neotigason® 25mg Acrivastine Benadryl® Allergy Relief 8mg Capsule 24mg Antihistamine R06AX18 OTC Carbomix 81.3%w/w Granules for oral suspension Antidiarrhoeal and Activated Charcoal
    [Show full text]
  • G6PD Deficiency Reference Guide
    Medications to Avoid Safe to take But only in normal therapeutic doses [!!!] G6PD Deficiency Reference Guide Analgesics / Antipyretics acetanilid, acetophenetidin (phenacetin), (Quoted from Ernest Beutler, M.D., “Glucose-6- amidopyrine (aminopyrine) *, Phosphate Dehydrogenase Deficiency,” in Eryth- What is G6PD Deficiency? antipyrine *, aspirin *, phenacetin, rocyte disorders: Anemias due to increased destruc- probenicid, pyramidone tion of erythrocytes with enzyme deficiencies, p. 598.) Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase likely to be affected by this condition than (G6PD) deficiency is the most common are females. Genetic testing is available to Miscellaneous Acetaminophen (paracetamol, Tylenol, human enzyme deficiency; it affects an identify a deficiency in G6PD in both alpha-methyldopa, ascorbic acid *, Tralgon, hydroxyacetanilide), estimated 400 million people worldwide. males and females. dimercaprol (BAL), hydralazine, Acetophenetidin (phenacetin), G6PD deficiency is also known as It is very important to tell any doctor or mestranol, methylene blue, nalidixic acid, Acetylsalicylic acid (aspirin) *, “favism,” since G6PD deficient individu- other health professional (such as nurse or naphthalene, niridazole, Aminopyrine (Pyramidon, amidopyrine) *, als are also allergic to fava beans. pharmacist) that you have G6PD Defi- phenylhydrazine, toluidine blue, Antazoline (Antistine), G6PD deficiency is a genetic condition ciency to avoid a possible harmful reaction trinitrotoluene, urate oxidase, vitamin Antipyrine *, that is inherited in an
    [Show full text]
  • Use of Antibiotics in Ornamental Fish Aquaculture1 Roy P
    Cir 84 Use of Antibiotics in Ornamental Fish Aquaculture1 Roy P. E. Yanong2 Introduction based on their response to a protocol called gram staining. Gram-positive bacteria stain blue, and gram-negative Antibiotics are very useful additions to any fish-health bacteria stain pink. They stain differently because each manager’s toolbox, but they are only tools and not ‘magic group has a different type of outer structure known as the bullets.’ The ability of antibiotics to help eliminate a fish cell wall. This difference is important for the producer disease depends on a number of factors: 1) Does the and aquaculturist because some antibiotics work better problem actually have a bacterial component? 2) Are the against gram-positive bacteria and others work better bacteria involved sensitive to the antibiotic chosen? 3) Are against gram-negative bacteria. Most bacteria that infect the proper dosage and treatment intervals being used? 4) fish are gram-negative, including Aeromonas hydrophila, Have other contributing stresses been removed or reduced? Aeromonas salmonicida, Flavobacterium columnare (which causes columnaris), Vibrio, and Pseudomonas species. (See Antibiotics, in and of themselves, do not cure a fish. Antibi- UF/IFAS Fact Sheets FA-14 Aeromonas Infections, FA-31 otics merely control the population growth of bacteria in a Vibrio Infections of Fish and FA-11 Columnaris disease). fish long enough for its immune system to eliminate them. The major group of gram-positive bacteria that cause Before antibiotics are even considered, sources of stress disease in fish are Streptococcus. (See UF/IFAS Circular 57 such as poor water quality (including drastic temperature Streptococcal Infections in Fish.) change), nutrition, genetics, and handling or transport must A third group, the acid-fast bacteria, which includes be removed or reduced.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 1 – Protocol for Preventing Or Reversing Chronic Disease The
    Appendix 1 – Protocol for Preventing or Reversing Chronic Disease The first author has developed a protocol over the past decade for preventing or reversing chronic disease based on the following systemic medical principle: “at the present time, removal of cause is a necessary, but not necessarily sufficient, condition for restorative treatment to be effective”[1]. The protocol methodology refines the age-old principles of both reducing harm in addition to providing treatment, and allows better identification of factors that contribute to the disease process (so that they may be eliminated if possible). These contributing factors are expansive and may include a combination of Lifestyle choices (diet, exercise, smoking), iatrogenic and biotoxin exposures, environmental/occupational exposures, and psychosocial stressors. This strategy exploits the existing literature to identify patterns of biologic response using biomarkers from various modalities of diagnostic testing to capture a much broader list of potential contributing factors. Existing inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) Biomarker Identification to Remove Contributing Factors and Implement Treatment The initial protocol steps are diagnostic. The main output of these diagnostics will be identification of the biomarker levels and symptoms that reflect abnormalities, and the directions of change required to eliminate these abnormalities. In the present study, hundreds of general and specific biomarkers and symptoms were identified from the core IBD literature. The highest frequency (based on numbers of record appearances) biomarkers and symptoms were extracted, and are listed in Table 1 (highest frequency items first, reading down each column before proceeding to the next column). They are not necessarily consensus biomarkers. They are biomarkers whose values were altered by a treatment or contributing factor, and reported in the core IBD literature.
    [Show full text]
  • Estonian Statistics on Medicines 2016 1/41
    Estonian Statistics on Medicines 2016 ATC code ATC group / Active substance (rout of admin.) Quantity sold Unit DDD Unit DDD/1000/ day A ALIMENTARY TRACT AND METABOLISM 167,8985 A01 STOMATOLOGICAL PREPARATIONS 0,0738 A01A STOMATOLOGICAL PREPARATIONS 0,0738 A01AB Antiinfectives and antiseptics for local oral treatment 0,0738 A01AB09 Miconazole (O) 7088 g 0,2 g 0,0738 A01AB12 Hexetidine (O) 1951200 ml A01AB81 Neomycin+ Benzocaine (dental) 30200 pieces A01AB82 Demeclocycline+ Triamcinolone (dental) 680 g A01AC Corticosteroids for local oral treatment A01AC81 Dexamethasone+ Thymol (dental) 3094 ml A01AD Other agents for local oral treatment A01AD80 Lidocaine+ Cetylpyridinium chloride (gingival) 227150 g A01AD81 Lidocaine+ Cetrimide (O) 30900 g A01AD82 Choline salicylate (O) 864720 pieces A01AD83 Lidocaine+ Chamomille extract (O) 370080 g A01AD90 Lidocaine+ Paraformaldehyde (dental) 405 g A02 DRUGS FOR ACID RELATED DISORDERS 47,1312 A02A ANTACIDS 1,0133 Combinations and complexes of aluminium, calcium and A02AD 1,0133 magnesium compounds A02AD81 Aluminium hydroxide+ Magnesium hydroxide (O) 811120 pieces 10 pieces 0,1689 A02AD81 Aluminium hydroxide+ Magnesium hydroxide (O) 3101974 ml 50 ml 0,1292 A02AD83 Calcium carbonate+ Magnesium carbonate (O) 3434232 pieces 10 pieces 0,7152 DRUGS FOR PEPTIC ULCER AND GASTRO- A02B 46,1179 OESOPHAGEAL REFLUX DISEASE (GORD) A02BA H2-receptor antagonists 2,3855 A02BA02 Ranitidine (O) 340327,5 g 0,3 g 2,3624 A02BA02 Ranitidine (P) 3318,25 g 0,3 g 0,0230 A02BC Proton pump inhibitors 43,7324 A02BC01 Omeprazole
    [Show full text]