DOCSLIB.ORG

Privity of Contract Contracts for the Benefit of Third Parties

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

PRIVITY OF CONTRACT CONTRACTS FOR THE BENEFIT OF THIRD PARTIES LAW COMMISSION LAW COM No 242 The Law Commission (LAW COM No 242) PRIVITY OF CONTRACT: CONTRACTS FOR THE BENEFIT OF THIRD PARTIES Item 1 of the Sixth Programme of Law Reform: The Law of Contract Presented to Parliament by the Lord High Chancellor .. by Command of Her Majesty July 1996 LONDON: HMSO E18.20 - - Cm 3329 The Law Commission was set up by section 1 of the Law Commissions Act 1965 for the purpose of promoting the reform of the law. The Commissioners are: The Honourable Mrs Justice Arden DBE, Chairman Professor Andrew Burrows Miss Diana Faber Mr Charles Harpum Mr Stephen Silber QC The Secretary of the Law Commission is Mr Michael Sayers and its offices are at Conquest House, 37-38 John Street, Theobalds Road, London, WClN 2BQ. The terms of this report were agreed on 19 June 1996. I .. 11 THE LAW COMMISSION PRIVITY OF CONTRACT: CONTRACTS FOR THE BENEFIT OF THIRD PARTIES CONTENTS Paragraph Page SECTION A: BACKGROUND PART I: INTRODUCTION 1 PART 11: THE PRESENT LAW AND CALLS FOR REFORM 1. The Present Law 2.1 6 (1) A Brief Statement of the Third Party Rule in Contract 2.1 6 (2) Development of the Third Party Rule 2.2 6 (3) Existing Exceptions to, or Circumventions ofJ the Third Party Rule 2.8 9 Trust of the Promise 2.8 9 Covenants Concerning Land 2.10 10 Tort of Negligence 2.13 12 Agency 2.15 14 Assignment 2.16 15 Collateral Contracts 2.18 16 Techniques Used to Enable Third Parties to Take the Benefit of Exclusion Clauses 2.19 16 Promisee’s Remedies Assisting the Third Party 2.36 25 (i) Damages 2.37 25 (ii) Specific Performance and a Stay of Action 2.47 29 Statutory Exceptions 2.52 31 (i) Life Insurance 2.53 31 (ii) Fire Insurance 2.54 31 (iii) Motor Insurance 2.55 31 (iv) Third Parties’ Rights Against Insurers 2.56 31 (v) Insurance by Those with Limited Interests 2.57 32 (vi) Bills of Exchange 2.58 32 (vii) Bills of Lading 2.59 32 (viii)Law of Property Act 1925, Section 56(1) 2.60 33 (ix) Companies Act 1985, Section 14 2.61 34 (x) Package Travel, Package Holidays and Package Tours Regulations 1992 2.62 34 2. Calls for Reform 2.63 35 ... 111 I Paragraph Page SECTION B: PRELIMINARY ISSUES PART 111: ARGUMENTS FOR REFORM 1. The Intentions of the Original Contracting Parties are Thwarted 3.1 39 2. The Injustice to the Third Party 3.2 39 3. The Person Who Has Suffered the Loss Cannot Sue, While the Person Who Has Suffered No Loss Can Sue 3.3 40 4. Even if the Promisee Can Obtain a Satisfactory Remedy for the Third Party, the Promisee May Not be Able to, or Wish to, Sue 3.4 40 5. The Development of Non-Comprehensive Exceptions 3.5 41 6. Complexity, Artificiality and Uncertainty 3.6 41 7. Widespread Criticism Throughout the Common Law World 3.7 41 8. The Legal Systems of Most Member States of the European Union Allow Third Parties to Enforce Contracts 3.8 41 9. The Third Party Rule Causes Difficulties in Commercial Life 3.9 43 (1) Construction Contracts 3.10 43 (2) Insurance Contracts 3.24 48 10. Conclusion 3.28 50 PART IV PRECEDENTS FOR REFORM 1. The Law Revision Committee Report 4.2 53 2. Abrogation of Third Party Rule in Other Common Law Jurisdictions 4.5 55 (1) Western Australia 4.5 55 (2) Queensland 4.8 56 (3) New Zealand 4.9 57 (4) United States 4.15 60 PART V. THE FORM OF THE LEGISLATION 1. A Detailed Legislative Scheme? 5.1 63 (1) Further Exceptions in Specific Instances 5.3 63 (2) Abolishing the Rule Preventing Recovery by the Promisee of Third Party’s Loss 5.4 63 (3) Removal of the Bar to Third Party Enforcement 5.5 64 (4) Reform by Means of a Detailed Legislative Scheme 5.7 65 2. Judicial Development of Third Party Rights 5.10 65 3. Reform of the Promisee’s Remedies? 5.12 66 PART VI: THE THIRD PARTY RULE AND CONSIDERATION 1. Introduction and Consultation 6.1 68 2. Consideration Must Move From the Promisee . 6.3 68 3. The Joint Promisee Exception 6.9 70 4. Reforming Privity Without Reforming Consideration: the Deeper Policy Question 6.13 72 iv Paragraph Page SECTION C: CENTRAL REFORM ISSUES PART VII: THE TEST OF ENFORCEABILITY 1. Consultation and Our Recommendation 7.1 74 2. The First Limb of the Test of Enforceability 7.10 77 3. The Second Limb of the Test of Enforceability 7.17 80 (1) General Aspects of the Second Limb 7.17 80 (2) Negligent Will-Drafting 7.19 81 (3) The Application of the Second Limb of the Test to Various Hypothetical Situations 7.28 85 (4) The Application of the Second Limb of the Test to Some Past Cases 7.45 90 4. The Rejected Tests 7.52 92 5. A Special Test of Enforceability for Consumers? 7.54 93 PART VIII: DESIGNATIONyEXISTENCE, AND ASCERTAINABILITY OF THIRD PARTY 1. Designation 8.1 95 2. Existence of Third Party 8.5 96 3. Pre-Incorporation Contracts: A Special Case? 8.9 97 4. Ascertainability of Third Party and Certainty 8.17 100 PART IX: VARIATION AND CANCELLATION 1. Provisional Proposals and Consultation 9.1 101 2. The Two Extreme Positions 9.5 102 (1) Variation or Cancellation at Any Time 9.5 102 (2) No Variation or Cancellation 9.10 103 3. Possible ccCrystallisationyyTests 9.11 104 (1) Awareness 9.12 104 (2) Reliance 9.14 104 (3) Detrimental Reliance 9.15 104 (4) Acceptance 9.16 105 (5) Adoption Expressly or by Conduct 9.17 105 4. Choice of Test 9.18 105 5. The Reliance Test: Further Details 9.27 108 (1) Need the Promisor Be Aware OJ or Forsee, the Reliance? 9.27 108 (2) Material Reliance 9.31 109 (3) Protection of the Third Party’s Reliance or Expectation Interest? 9.32 109 (4) Burden of Proof 9.34 110 (5) Reliance by Someone Other Than the Third Party 9.35 110 6. Reservation of a Right to Vary or Cancel 9.37 111 7. Can the Relevant Crystallisation Test be Laid Down in the Contract? 9.41 112 8. Crystallisation Where There Is More Than One Third Party 9.43 112 9. Creating Irrevocable Rights 9.45 113 10. Judicial Discretion to Authorise Variation or Cancellation 9.48 113 V Paragraph Page PART X: DEFENCES, SET-OFFS AND COUNTERCLAIMS 1. Introduction 10.1 115 2. Precedents for Reform 10.5 116 (1) Law Revision Committee1Western AustralialQueensland 10.5 116 (2) United States 10.6 117 (3) New Zealand 10.7 117 3. Options for Reform 10.8 118 4. Defences,-Set-Offs and Counterclaims Available Only Against the Third Party 10.17 122 5. Third Party Enforcing an Exclusion or Limitation Clause 10.22 123 6. The Line Between Benefits and Burdens 10.24 124 PART XI: OVERLAPPING CLAIMS 1. More Than One Plaintiff: Claims by the Third Party and by the Promise e 11.1 128 (1) Promisee’s Rights 11.1 128 (2) Promisee’s Rights Where Performance by Promisor to Third Party 11.5 128 (3) Promisee’s Rights Where Release oflsettlement with Promisor by Third Party 11.7 129 (4) Releases Where More Than One Third Party 11.9 130 (5> Third Party’s Rights Where Performance by Promisor to Promisee (Rather than to Third Party), or Release oflsettlement with Promisor by Promisee 11.11 131 (6) Priority of Action? 11.14 131 (7) Avoidance of Double Liability 11.16 132 2. More Than One Defendant: Claims by the Third Party Against the Promisor, and Against the Promisee on a Pre-Existing Liability 11.23 135 PART XII: EXISTING EXCEPTIONS 1. Preserving Existing Exceptions 12.1 138 2. Should Existing Legislation Conferring Rights of Enforceability on Third Parties Preclude a Third Party Taking Rights under Our Proposed Legislation? 12.5 139 (1) Contracts for the Carriage of Goods by Sea 12.7 140 (2) Contracts for the International Carriage of Goods by Road, Rail or Air 12.12 142 (3) Contracts Contained in Bills of Exchange, Promissory Notes and Other Negotiable Instruments 12.16 144 3. Should This Opportunity Be Taken to Reform the Third Parties (Rights Against Insurers) Act 1930 and the Married Women’s Property Act 1882? 12.18 145 (1) Third Parties (Rights Against Insurers) Act 1930 12.19 145 (2) Married Women’s Property Act 1882 12.22 146 vi Paragraph Page PART XIII: CONSEQUENTIAL AMENDMENTS 1. Our General Approach 13.1 149 2. The Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977 13.9 151 3. Limitation Act 1980 13.14 155 1 1 PART XIV. MISCELLANEOUS ISSUES ~ 1. Joinder of Promisee 14.1 156 2. Assignment of the Third Party’s Right 14.6 157 3. Contracts for the Sale of Land 14.8 158 4. Choice of Law 14.12 160 5. Arbitration Agreements and Jurisdiction Agreements 14.14 160 6. Commencement of the Legislation 14.20 163 SECTION D: SUMMARY PART XV SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIO iS 164 Appendix A: Draft Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Bill with Explanatory Notes 173 Appendix B: Legislation From Some Other Jurisdictions 184 Appendix C: List of Persons and Organisations who Commented on Consultation Paper No 121 191 Appendix D: Participants at the Conference on Reform of the Law of Privity of Contract 194 vii THE LAW COMMISSION Item 1 of the Sixth Programme of Law Reform: The Law of Contract PRIVITY OF CONTRACT: CONTRACTS FOR THE BENEFIT OF THIRD PARTIES To the Right Honourable the Lord Mackay of Clashfern, Lord High Chancellor of Great Britain SECTION A BACKGROUND PART I INTRODUCTION 1.1 In 1995 in the Court of Appeal in Darlington Borough Council v Wiltshier Northern Ltd’ Steyn LJ, in criticising the present law, said the following:- The case for recognising a contract for the benefit of a third party is simple and straightforward.
Recommended publications
  • Drafting and Enforcing Complex Indemnification Provisions

    Drafting and Enforcing Complex Indemnification Provisions

    Drafting And Enforcing Complex Indemnification Provisions D. Hull D. Hull Youngblood, Jr. and Peter N. Flocos Youngblood, Jr. is a partner in the Forget about copy and paste. The best indem­ Austin, Texas office nification provisions start with the details of of K&L Gates LLP. Mr. Youngblood the transaction. focuses his practice on government contracting, the security industry and com plex THE PURPOSE of this article is to assist transactional financial transactions, and regularly represents and litigation attorneys in the negotiation and drafting clients in a wide array of local, state, and federal of customized, and therefore more effective, indemnifi- contracting transactions and disputes. He can be cation provisions in a wide range of situations, and also reached at [email protected]. to spot certain litigation issues that may arise out of in- demnification provisions. This article will identify issues Peter N. and strategies and suggested language that can act as a Flocos starting point to protect the client’s interests in the area is a partner in the of indemnification in complex transactions and litigation. New York City Readers should note that this article is for informational office of K&L Gates purposes, does not contain or convey legal advice, and LLP. Mr. Flocos, may or may not reflect the views of the authors’ firm or who began his any particular client or affiliate of that firm. The infor- legal career as mation herein should not be used or relied upon in regard a transactional lawyer and then to any particular facts or circumstances without first con- became a litigator, sulting a lawyer.
  • Introduction

    Introduction

    17 May 2016 Learn With Us: Boilerplate clauses Jenny Mee, Partner, K&L Gates © Copyright 2016 by K&L Gates. All rights reserved. INTRODUCTION This publication is for informational purposes and does not contain or convey legal advice. The information herein should not be used or relied upon in regard to any particular facts or circumstances 5/17/2016 without first consulting a lawyer. ©2016 K&L Gates LLP. All Rights Reserved. 1 WHAT IS A “BOILERPLATE” CLAUSE? Boilerplate is any text that is or can be reused in new contexts or applications without being greatly changed from the original (Wikipedia) In contract law, the term "boilerplate language" describes the parts of a contract that are considered standard (Wikipedia) klgates.com 3 ETYMOLOGY ° Wikipedia: ° "Boiler plate" originally referred to the sheet steel used to make boilers ° The analogy between the curved steel used to make water boilers and curved metal used to print prepared text was based on: ° the curved shape of the plate; and ° the fact that it had been prepared elsewhere before being incorporated into a downstream producer’s finished product ° In the field of printing, the term dates back to the early 1900s klgates.com 4 This publication is for informational purposes and does not contain or convey legal advice. The information herein should not be used or relied upon in regard to any particular facts or circumstances 5/17/2016 without first consulting a lawyer. ©2016 K&L Gates LLP. All Rights Reserved. 2 EXAMPLES OF BOILERPLATE CLAUSES ° “General” clause at the back, covering (eg): ° Governing law and jurisdiction ° Notices ° Entire agreement ° Further assurances ° No waiver ° Severability ° Contra proferentum (no adverse interpretation) ° Standard definitions and interpretation provisions ° Other standard clauses ° eg force majeure, termination, insurance, etc klgates.com 5 AGENDA FOR THIS SESSION ° Entire agreement clauses ° Set-off clauses ° No waiver clauses klgates.com 6 This publication is for informational purposes and does not contain or convey legal advice.
  • Law 410 CONTRACTS BUCKWOLD

    Law 410 CONTRACTS BUCKWOLD

    Law 410 CONTRACTS BUCKWOLD 1 FORMATION: Is there a contract? In order to have a contract, you must have: o Capacity to contract: Note that minors can enforce a contract against adults, but adults cannot enforce against minors. o Consensus ad idem – ie “meeting of the minds”: Parties must be in agreement to the same terms. Offer & acceptance . Certainty as to terms o Consideration: Parties must have exchanged value not necessarily money, but what they deem to be value. 2 types of contract: o Bilateral: promissory offer by X + acceptance by Y entailing a reciprocal promise . E.g. X offers to sell car to Y for $5000 (offer). Y agrees to by the car (acceptance) = Contract! Which includes: Express terms (e.g. price, model, payment, etc.) Implied terms (implied on basis of presumed intention) o Unilateral: promissory offer by X + acceptance by Y through performance of requested act(s) . E.g. X offers to give Y a sandwich if Y dusts X‟s house (offer). Y dusts (acceptance) = Contract! Which includes: Express terms Implied terms (see above) TERMS OF CONTRACT Note: As a general rule, terms of a contract are those expressly established by the offer plus terms that may be implied. (See MJB Enterprises for more on implied terms) Does lack of subjective knowledge of the terms of an offer preclude recognition and enforcement of an unknown term? No. If the terms are readily accessible, then signing the contract (or clicking “I accept”) constitutes agreeing to them. Rudder v. Microsoft Corp Class action lawsuit against Microsoft; Microsoft said
  • Wolfsberg Group Trade Finance Principles 2019

    Wolfsberg Group Trade Finance Principles 2019

    Trade Finance Principles 1 The Wolfsberg Group, ICC and BAFT Trade Finance Principles 2019 amendment PUBLIC Trade Finance Principles 2 Copyright © 2019, Wolfsberg Group, International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) and BAFT Wolfsberg Group, ICC and BAFT hold all copyright and other intellectual property rights in this collective work and encourage its reproduction and dissemination subject to the following: Wolfsberg Group, ICC and BAFT must be cited as the source and copyright holder mentioning the title of the document and the publication year if available. Express written permission must be obtained for any modification, adaptation or translation, for any commercial use and for use in any manner that implies that another organization or person is the source of, or is associated with, the work. The work may not be reproduced or made available on websites except through a link to the relevant Wolfsberg Group, ICC and/or BAFT web page (not to the document itself). Permission can be requested from the Wolfsberg Group, ICC or BAFT. This document was prepared for general information purposes only, does not purport to be comprehensive and is not intended as legal advice. The opinions expressed are subject to change without notice and any reliance upon information contained in the document is solely and exclusively at your own risk. The publishing organisations and the contributors are not engaged in rendering legal or other expert professional services for which outside competent professionals should be sought. PUBLIC Trade Finance Principles
  • In Dispute 30:2 Contract Formation

    In Dispute 30:2 Contract Formation

    CHAPTER 30 CONTRACTS Introductory Note A. CONTRACT FORMATION 30:1 Contract Formation ― In Dispute 30:2 Contract Formation ― Need Not Be in Writing 30:3 Contract Formation ― Offer 30:4 Contract Formation ― Revocation of Offer 30:5 Contract Formation ― Counteroffer 30:6 Contract Formation ― Acceptance 30:7 Contract Formation ― Consideration 30:8 Contract Formation ― Modification 30:9 Contract Formation ― Third-Party Beneficiary B. CONTRACT PERFORMANCE 30:10 Contract Performance — Breach of Contract — Elements of Liability 30:11 Contract Performance — Breach of Contract Defined 30:12 Contract Performance — Substantial Performance 30:13 Contract Performance — Anticipatory Breach 30:14 Contract Performance — Time of Performance 30:15 Contract Performance — Conditions Precedent 30:16 Contract Performance — Implied Duty of Good Faith and Fair Dealing — Non-Insurance Contract 30:17 Contract Performance — Assignment C. DEFENSES Introductory Note 30:18 Defense — Fraud in the Inducement 30:19 Defense — Undue Influence 30:20 Defense — Duress 30:21 Defense — Minority 30:22 Defense — Mental Incapacity 30:23 Defense — Impossibility of Performance 30:24 Defense — Inducing a Breach by Words or Conduct 30:25 Defense — Waiver 30:26 Defense — Statute of Limitations 30:27 Defense — Cancellation by Agreement 30:28 Defense — Accord and Satisfaction (Later Contract) 30:29 Defense — Novation D. CONTRACT INTERPRETATION Introductory Note 30:30 Contract Interpretation — Disputed Term 30:31 Contract Interpretation — Parties’ Intent 30:32 Contract Interpretation —
  • Musharakah Agreement

    Musharakah Agreement

    Ref No: _____________ Musharakah Agreement THIS WAKALAH AGREEMENT is made on the day and year stated in Section 1 of the First Schedule, BETWEEN Name: ____________________________________________ Passport Number: ______________________ Country of Passport: __________________ Investor Type: ____________________ and includes his/her successors in title, heirs, personal representatives and permitted assigns (hereinafter referred to as the “Investor”) AND PT Esensi Prima Cipta ,Indonesia. (hereinafter referred to as the “Developer”). Each Investor and Developer may be referred to in this Agreement individually as a “Party” and collectively as the “Parties.” WHEREAS, the Investor desires to participate in the Project on a profit and loss sharing basis by providing the Developer with the Commitment Amount in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement; and WHEREAS, the Developer desires to participate in the Project on a profit and loss sharing basis by providing capital and by managing the Commitment Amount of the Investor in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement. NOW IT IS HEREBY AGREED as follows: 1. DEFINITIONS In this Agreement the following words and expressions shall, save where the context otherwise requires, have the following meanings: : The amount that the Investor has agreed to contribute in Commitment Amount the Project as described in Section 4 of the Appendix; PT Ethis Modal Indonesia Company : PT Esensi Prima Cipta (“Developer”); Developer : Indonesian Rupiah; IDR Unless
  • Privity of Contract

    Privity of Contract

    PRIVITY OF CONTRACT Michael Furmston GJ Tolhurst http://www.pbookshop.com 1 1 Great Clarendon Street, Oxford, OX2 6DP, United Kingdom Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide. Oxford is a registered trade mark of Oxford University Press in the UK and in certain other countries © Michael Furmston and GJ Tolhurst 2015 The moral rights of the authors have been asserted First Edition published in 2015 Impression: 1 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press, or as expressly permitted by law, by licence or under terms agreed with the appropriate reprographics rights organization. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside the scope of the above should be sent to the Rights Department, Oxford University Press, at the address above You must not circulate this work in any other form and you must impose this same condition on any acquirer Crown copyright material is reproduced under Class Licence Number C01P0000148 with the permission of OPSI and the Queen’s Printer for Scotland Published in the United States of America by Oxford University Press 198 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10016, United States of America British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data Data available Library of Congress Control Number: 2014960259 ISBN 978–0–19–967799–3 Printed and bound by CPI Group (UK) Ltd, Croydon, CR0 4YY Links to third party websites are provided by Oxford in good faith and for information only.
  • SAMPLE NOTES from OUR LLB CORE GUIDE: Contract Law Privity Chapter

    SAMPLE NOTES from OUR LLB CORE GUIDE: Contract Law Privity Chapter

    SAMPLE NOTES FROM OUR LLB CORE GUIDE: Contract Law Privity chapter LLB Answered is a comprehensive, first-class set of exam-focused study notes for the Undergraduate Law Degree. This is a sample from one of our Core Guides. We also offer dedicated Case Books. Please visit lawanswered.com if you wish to purchase a copy. Notes for the LPC are also available via lawanswered.com. This chapter is provided by way of sample, for marketing purposes only. It does not constitute legal advice. No warranties as to its contents are provided. All rights reserved. Copyright © Answered Ltd. PRIVITY KEY CONCEPTS 5 DOCTRINE OF PRIVITY Under the common law: A third party cannot… enforce , be liable for, or acquire rights under … a contract to which he is not a party. AVOIDING THE DOCTRINE OF PRIVITY The main common law exceptions are: AGENCY RELATIONSHIPS ASSIGNMENT TRUSTS JUDICIAL INTERVENTION The main statutory exception is: CONTRACTS (RIGHTS OF THIRD PARTIES) ACT 1999 44 PRIVITY WHAT IS PRIVITY? “The doctrine of privity means that a contract cannot, as a general rule, confer PRIVITY rights or impose obligations arising under it on any person except the parties to it.” Treitel, The Law of Contract. Under the doctrine of privity: ACQUIRE RIGHTS UNDER A third party cannot BE LIABLE FOR a contract to which he is not a party. ENFORCE NOTE: the doctrine is closely connected to the principle that consideration must move from the promisee (see Consideration chapter). The leading cases on the classic doctrine are Price v Easton, Tweddle v Atkinson and Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Co Ltd v Selfridges & Co Ltd.
  • Vicarious Liability in Contracts of International Carriage of Goods By

    Vicarious Liability in Contracts of International Carriage of Goods By

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives Vicarious Liability in contracts of international carriage of goods by sea A comparative study of the evolution of liability through the main international conventions and market practice Candidate number: 5068 Submission deadline: 01/11/2016 Number of words: 15364 Table of contents 1 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Scope, Method and Structure of the Thesis ................................................................. 2 2 THE AVENT OF THE FIRST INTERNATIONAL REGULATION AND THE MARKET SOLUTIONS TO LIABILITY ISSUES RAISING IN CONTRACTS OF MARITIME CARRIAGE OF GOODS: THE HAGUE-VISBY RULES AND THE HIMALAYA CLAUSE. ......................................................................... 4 2.1 The Hague/Hague-Visby Rules: the first conventional set of international rules ....... 6 2.1.1 The Carrier’s main duties established by the Hague-Visby Rules ................. 7 2.1.2 Exclusion and Limitation of liability rights of the Carrier ........................... 10 2.1.3 Concluding Remarks .................................................................................... 13 2.2 The Himalaya Clause: an innovative change on the field of third parties and vicarious liability systems. ........................................................................................ 13 2.2.1 Main Issues Raised by the use Himalaya clauses
  • Bad Agent, Good Citizen?

    Bad Agent, Good Citizen?

    BAD AGENT, GOOD CITIZEN? Claire Hill,* Brett McDonnell** & Aaron Stenz*** INTRODUCTION Lawyers are agents for their principals—their clients.1 The Restatement (Third) of Agency sets forth an agent’s duty: “[A]n agent has a fiduciary duty to act loyally for the principal’s benefit in all matters connected with the agency relationship.”2 A good agent is a loyal agent. The Restatement also sets forth several important components of the duty: “An agent has a duty not to acquire a material benefit from a third party in connection with transactions conducted or other actions taken on behalf of the principal or otherwise through the agent’s use of the agent’s position.”3 Further, “[a]n agent has a duty not to deal with the principal as or on behalf of an adverse party in a transaction connected with the agency relationship.”4 A lawyer who violates these duties is a bad agent, in breach of her fiduciary duty of loyalty to her principal.5 Lawyers also have professional obligations to the broader society. Notably, they cannot help their clients commit crimes, nor can they be party to their client’s concealment of crimes.6 Even consistent with those obligations, and certainly in gray areas (such as avoiding inconvenient knowledge),7 whether they are being good agents or bad agents for their clients, lawyers can help—or harm—the broader society.8 * Professor and James L. Krusemark Chair in Law, University of Minnesota Law School. ** Dorsey & Whitney Chair in Law, University of Minnesota Law School *** J.D. Candidate, 2020, University of Minnesota Law School, This Article was prepared for the Colloquium on Corporate Lawyers, hosted by the Fordham Law Review and the Stein Center for Law and Ethics on October 11, 2019, at Fordham University School of Law.
  • Bills of Lading Vs Sea Waybills, and the Himalaya Clause Peter G

    Bills of Lading Vs Sea Waybills, and the Himalaya Clause Peter G

    Bills of Lading vs Sea Waybills, and The Himalaya Clause Peter G. Pamel and Robert C. Wilkins Borden Ladner Gervais, LLP Presented at the NJI/CMLA, Federal Court and Federal Court of Appeal Canadian Maritime Law Association Seminar April 15, 2011 Fairmont Château Laurier, Ottawa 1) Introduction Bills of lading and sea waybills are two of the most common forms of transport document used in contemporary shipping. Their similarities and difference, and respective uses, in such trade should be clearly understood by all who are involved in that activity. In particular the meaning of “document of title” used in respect of bills of lading, and whether sea waybills are or are not also such documents of title, have given rise to much debate, which has now largely been resolved in major shipping nations. Also, the impact on these transport documents of compulsorily applicable liability regimes set out in international carriage of goods by sea conventions is also essential to a proper grasp of the role these documents play in international maritime commerce. It is also interesting to examine how parties other than carriers, shippers and consignees can and do benefit from certain clauses in ocean bills of lading and sea waybills which purport to confer on such third parties or classes of them the exemptions from, and limitations of, liability which marine carriers assume in the performance of their functions. This paper will attempt to provide an overview of these issues, with special reference to how they are addressed in Canadian maritime law. 2) Bills of Lading and Sea Waybills in Modern Shipping Bills of lading and sea waybills are the two basic documents that attest to the carriage of goods by water, both domestically within Canada and internationally.
  • Zombie Contracts, Dark Patterns of Design, and 'Documentisation'

    Zombie Contracts, Dark Patterns of Design, and 'Documentisation'

    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Cornelius, Kristin B. Article Zombie contracts, dark patterns of design, and 'documentisation' Internet Policy Review Provided in Cooperation with: Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (HIIG), Berlin Suggested Citation: Cornelius, Kristin B. (2019) : Zombie contracts, dark patterns of design, and 'documentisation', Internet Policy Review, ISSN 2197-6775, Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society, Berlin, Vol. 8, Iss. 2, pp. 1-25, http://dx.doi.org/10.14763/2019.2.1412 This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/214079 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/de/legalcode www.econstor.eu INTERNET POLICY REVIEW Journal on internet regulation Volume 8 | Issue 2 Zombie contracts, dark patterns of design, and ‘documentisation’ Kristin B.