Scotland EU Blueprint

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Scotland EU Blueprint The EU Blueprint Pathway for Scotland’s Accession to the European Union under Independence ANTHONY SALAMONE Европейски съюз Unión Europea Evropská unie Den Europæiske Union Europäische Union Euroopa Liit Ευρωπαϊκή Ένωση European Union Union européenne An tAontas Eorpach An t-Aonadh Eòrpach Europska unija Unione europea Eiropas Savienība Europos Sąjunga Európai Unió Unjoni Ewropea Europese Unie Unia Europejska União Europeia Uniunea Europeană Európska únia Evropska unija Euroopan unioni Europeiska unionen The EU Blueprint Pathway for Scotland’s Accession to the European Union under Independence ANTHONY SALAMONE Publications from European Merchants Scotland and the Spirit of Europe: Protecting Scotland’s European Relations in the Face of Brexit Anthony Salamone · 30 November 2019 Purveyors of Political Insight European Merchants Ltd Company No SC643557 Registered in Scotland © 2020 Anthony Salamone All Rights Reserved Published in Edinburgh 18 February 2020 Design by Anthony Salamone Set in Muli · Open Font License Proudly European merchants.scot About Anthony Salamone Anthony Salamone is a political scientist, analyst and writer. His primary areas of expertise rest in EU politics and institutions, Scottish politics, British politics and international relations. Equipped with over ten years of experience in European and Scottish affairs, he is an authority on Scotland’s European and external relations, Scottish paradiplomacy and soft power, and the politics of Scottish independence on Europe and international affairs. Anthony has degrees from the University of Edinburgh and the London School of Economics and Political Science. At present, he is Managing Director of European Merchants, the Scottish political insight firm which he founded in Edinburgh. He is a Member of the Edinburgh Europa Institute and President Emeritus of the Edinburgh University European Union Society. Anthony has a strong commitment to public debate on European issues in Scotland and beyond, having organised and chaired numerous panel discussions, lectures and seminars on a range of themes. He is a frequent public speaker and commentator on EU politics, Scottish independence, Brexit and Scottish politics. About European Merchants European Merchants is a Scottish political insight firm based in Edinburgh, dedicated to bringing innovative analysis and bold ideas to Scotland’s European relations and the major questions facing the European Union. 3 Contents 6 Executive Summary 13 Introduction 1 Institutions and Principles 14 1A Institutions of the State 14 1B Principles for European Relations 15 1C Government Department 18 1D European Relations in Practice 20 1E International Organisations 21 1F Transition to Independence 25 2 Accession Parameters 29 2A Scotland’s Path to Accession 29 2B Preparation of Application 31 2C Accession Criteria 33 2D Accession Procedure 36 2E Accession Timeline 41 2F EU Political Considerations 45 3 Pre-Accession Period 48 3A Independence and Pre-Accession 48 3B Association Negotiations 50 3C Association Objectives 53 3D Scotland’s EU Convergence 56 3E Representation in Brussels 59 3F EU Institution and Bilateral Relations 62 4 Negotiation Mechanics 64 4A Negotiation Principles 64 4B Negotiation Basis 66 4C Negotiation Actors 70 4D Negotiation Structure 72 4E Internal Decision-Making 73 4F EU Decision-Making 75 5 Negotiation Priorities 76 5A Scotland’s Negotiation Context 76 5B Institutional Matters 78 5C Major Policy Matters 80 5D Special Considerations 83 5E Transitional Provisions 85 5F Negotiation Objectives 88 4 6 Approvals and Ratification 89 6A Conclusion of Negotiations 89 6B Approval Sequence 90 6C Post-Signature Period 91 6D National Ratification 92 6E Member State Ratifications 94 6F Conclusion of Ratification 96 7 Membership Preparations 97 7A Government and EU Accession 97 7B Parliament and EU Accession 99 7C Public Participation 100 7D Education and Learning 101 7E European Celebration Programme 102 7F Future EU Reform Provisions 103 8 Final Accession Measures 104 8A Inaugural EU Appointments 104 8B European Parliament Election 106 8C EU Civil Service 107 8D Permanent Representation 108 8E EU Institutions in Scotland 111 8F Point of Accession 112 9 Post-Accession Membership 113 9A Europe in National Politics 113 9B Government and EU Membership 114 9C Parliament and EU Membership 115 9D Scotland in the EU Institutions 117 9E European Policy Matters 118 9F EU Council Presidency 119 10 Strategy and Influence 121 10A Parameters for Influence 121 10B Post-Accession Strategy 122 10C Government Strategy 122 10D EU Institutional Relations 124 10E EU Bilateral Relations 124 10F Alliances and Partnerships 125 127 Recommendations References 132 5 Executive Summary Institutions of the State The Blueprint is based on the potential scenario that after independence Scotland becomes a parliamentary republic with a written constitution. Scotland must consider EU membership a question of values, not just interests. As a European small state, joining the EU will serve Scotland’s economic, social and geostrategic interests, but it will also be a fundamental expression of the shared values between it and the other EU members. Scotland should define Principles for European Relations, and it must build a positive national story on Scotland’s place in the EU for public confidence on EU membership to be maintained. Reflecting its values, the Government should create the Department of European and External Relations as its ministry of foreign affairs. The Scottish diplomatic corps should be the Scottish European and External Relations Service. It should also establish the European Relations Council, a regular ministerial forum on European affairs, and the Advisory Council on European Relations to gather expertise on European affairs. The international organisations which Scotland will join or with which it will have a close relationship will also have a bearing on EU accession and membership. Following a referendum endorsing independence, the Scottish Government and UK Government should conclude a Scotland-UK Framework Agreement governing their relationship and endorsing the Scottish Government’s engagement with the EU to prepare for independence. A logical and necessary consequence of Scotland becoming independent is the internationalisation of the border between Scotland and England. Scotland’s borders will define the territory of the state, not constitute impassable barriers. On EU membership, Scotland must make decisions in its national interests. Just as Ireland did not leave the EU because the UK left it, so Scotland should not refrain from joining the EU because rUK is not a member. The Scottish state should be built with future EU membership in mind. Accession Parameters Scotland must apply for EU membership in the normal way, despite its history. Each application for EU membership is progressed at its own pace and no queue exists. Scotland will only be able to apply for EU membership once it has become an independent state. Before making its application, Scotland should clearly define its Strategic Priorities for EU Accession. Its application should be based on a parliamentary vote, rather than a referendum. Scotland should not apply to join the European Free Trade Association as a temporary measure. Instead, the EU and Scotland should negotiate an Association Agreement. Scotland is a European nation. It has an advanced democracy with a developed free-market economy, underpinned by respect for the rule of law and human rights. Scotland will be in an extremely strong position to satisfy the political and 6 Executive Summary economic dimensions of the Copenhagen Criteria, and in a strong position to satisfy the institutional dimension. Scotland’s accession would not pose a challenge to the EU’s integration capacity. After it is granted candidate country status, Scotland will follow the procedure of accession devised by the EU. The length of the accession process is not predefined. Accounting for its situation, Scotland will reasonably take 4 – 5 years to join the EU. The Government should adopt a Target to EU Accession of 4 years. These timescales are not a product of inherent difficulties, but the fact that EU accession results from procedures which must be followed. Enlargement is a salient matter in the EU, and preferences of the Member States on the conditions for further expansion differ. These arguments are not particularly new. The European Commission has recently proposed changes to the accession process. These proposals focus mainly on the negotiation structure and rule of law. They should have no significant implications for Scotland. Pre-Accession Period Scotland will have to negotiate its relationship with the EU covering the point of independence to the point of accession. Under the Framework Agreement, Scotland should be afforded international legal personality. The most optimal mechanism for EU-Scotland relations in the pre-accession period will be an Association Agreement. The objective will be to negotiate, approve and ratify the agreement during Scotland’s transition to independence, so that it can enter into force at the point of independence. The EU can conclude an association agreement with an entity which is not an independent state. The Association Agreement will be an EU-only agreement, concluded directly between the EU and Scotland. The Government should establish Strategic Objectives for EU Association. With its strong political and economic institutions, robust governance, extensive existing compliance with
Recommended publications
  • Government Response to the House of Commons European Scrutiny Committee Report HC 109-1 of Session 2013-14 Reforming the Scrutiny System in the House of Commons
    Government Response to the House of Commons European Scrutiny Committee Report HC 109-1 of Session 2013-14 Reforming the Scrutiny System in the House of Commons Presented to Parliament by the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs by Command of Her Majesty July 2014 Cm 8914 Government Response to the House of Commons European Scrutiny Committee Report HC 109-1 of Session 2013-14 Reforming the Scrutiny System in the House of Commons Presented to Parliament by the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs by Command of Her Majesty July 2014 Cm 8914 © Crown copyright 2014 You may re-use this information (excluding logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence v.2. To view this licence visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/2/ or email [email protected] Where third party material has been identified, permission from the respective copyright holder must be sought. This publication is available at www.gov.uk/government/publications. Any enquiries regarding this publication should be sent to us at [email protected]. Print ISBN 9781474109796 Web ISBN 9781474109802 Printed in the UK by the Williams Lea Group on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office. ID P002659226 42260 07/14 Printed on paper containing 75% recycled fibre content minimum. Government Response to the House of Commons European Scrutiny Committee 24th Report HC 109-1 of Session 2013-14, Reforming the Scrutiny System in the House of Commons The Government welcomes the European Scrutiny Committee’s Inquiry into Reforming the Scrutiny System in the House of Commons and the detailed consideration the Committee has given this important issue.
    [Show full text]
  • Diplomatic Dictionary
    DIPLOMATIC DICTIONARY A | B | C | D | E | F | I | M | N | P | R | S | T | V A ACCESSION The procedure by which a nation becomes a party to an agreement already in force between other nations. ACCORDS International agreements originally thought to be for lesser subjects than those covered by treaties, but now really treaties by a different name. AMBASSADOR The chief of a diplomatic mission; the ranking official diplomatic representative of a country to the country to which s/he is appointed, and the personal representative of his/her own head of state to the head of state of the host country. Ambassador is capitalized when referring to a specific person (i.e., Ambassador Smith) AMERICAN PRESENCE POSTS (APP) A special purpose overseas post with limited staffing and responsibilities, established as a consulate under the Vienna Convention. APPs are located cities outside the capital that are important but do not host a U.S. consulate. Typically these posts do not have any consular services on site, so the APP’s activities are limited or narrowly focused on priorities such as public outreach, business facilitation, and issue advocacy. Examples of American Presence Posts include: Bordeaux, France; Winnipeg, Canada; Medan, Indonesia and Busan, Korea. ARMS CONTROL Arms Control refers to controlling the amount or nature of weapons-such as the number of nuclear weapons or the nature of their delivery vehicles -- a specific nation is allowed to have at a specific time. ATTACHÉ An official assigned to a diplomatic mission or embassy. Usually, this person has advanced expertise in a specific field, such as agriculture, commerce, or the military.
    [Show full text]
  • Recognition of the Khojaly Genocide at the ICO
    Administrative Department of the President of the Republic of Azerbaijan P R E S I D E N T I A L L I B R A R Y ────────────────────────────────────────────────────── Recognition of the Genocide of Khojaly The member of the US California Assembly recognizes Khojaly Massacre (March 25, 2009) ............................................................................................................................................... 4 The recognition of the Khojaly Genocide at the ICO ............................................................... 5 Massachusetts State of the United States recognizes Khojaly tragedy as a massacre (February 25, 2010) ...................................................................................................................... 7 Recognition of the Khojaly genocide by Pakistan ..................................................................... 8 Recognition of the Khojaly massacre in Mexico ........................................................................ 9 The resolution adopted by the Senate of Mexico (October 27, 2011) .................................... 10 The resolution adopted by the Chamber of Deputies of Mexico (November 30, 2011) ....... 13 Khojaly to be recognized as Genocide in International level: representatives of the Parliaments of 51 States adopts the relevant resolution (January 31, 2012) ........................ 18 Texas House of Representatives passes resolution on Khojaly genocide (February 21, 2012) .....................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Diplomatic Courier Vol
    Diplomatic Courier Vol. 1 | Issue 1 | July 17, 2016 The Diplomatic Courier Vol. 1 | issue 1 | July 17, 2016 [email protected] E D I T O R I A L We and Our World! e are the world! Michael Jackson and scores of oth- nately, however, what they do and what it means for the er international stars sang this sweet song by that state is not always sufficiently highlighted and thus not suf- Wname, which reminds us that we are all, countries ficiently known. and people big and small, part of a global village. With the help of the diplomatic community, The Diplomat- Diplomacy and protocol have their irreplaceable place in ic Courier Online will change that situation – and for the global, regional and national affairs of all states that make up better. our global village. The Diplomatic Corps in every sovereign This inaugural issue of The Diplomatic Courier covers the state plays a valuable function necessary for both the country most recent reports from embassies and issues of interest not represented and the host country. only to the diplomatic community, but also anyone interest- The diplomatic community also includes offices of regional ed in regional and international affairs. and international inter-governmental organizations, includ- We look forward to continued cooperation with the diplo- ing the United Nations and its related organizations, as well matic community to keep this publication going – and we as Latin American and Caribbean organizations. Unfortu- pledge to keep the Courier coming your way regularly. PM sends condolences to France after bloody Nice attack he Saint Lucia Prime Minister has sent the nations deep condolences to the Government and People of France Tfollowing the recent attack in Nice.
    [Show full text]
  • The Strange Revival of Bicameralism
    The Strange Revival of Bicameralism Coakley, J. (2014). The Strange Revival of Bicameralism. Journal of Legislative Studies, 20(4), 542-572. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2014.926168 Published in: Journal of Legislative Studies Queen's University Belfast - Research Portal: Link to publication record in Queen's University Belfast Research Portal Publisher rights © 2014 Taylor & Francis. This work is made available online in accordance with the publisher’s policies. Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher General rights Copyright for the publications made accessible via the Queen's University Belfast Research Portal is retained by the author(s) and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy The Research Portal is Queen's institutional repository that provides access to Queen's research output. Every effort has been made to ensure that content in the Research Portal does not infringe any person's rights, or applicable UK laws. If you discover content in the Research Portal that you believe breaches copyright or violates any law, please contact [email protected]. Download date:01. Oct. 2021 Published in Journal of Legislative Studies , 20 (4) 2014, pp. 542-572; doi: 10.1080/13572334.2014.926168 THE STRANGE REVIVAL OF BICAMERALISM John Coakley School of Politics and International Relations University College Dublin School of Politics, International Studies and Philosophy Queen’s University Belfast [email protected] [email protected] ABSTRACT The turn of the twenty-first century witnessed a surprising reversal of the long-observed trend towards the disappearance of second chambers in unitary states, with 25 countries— all but one of them unitary—adopting the bicameral system.
    [Show full text]
  • Triangle of Partnership Or Conflicts
    International Journal of Political Science (IJPS) Volume 4, Issue 4, 2018, PP 34-41 ISSN 2454-9452 http://dx.doi.org/10.20431/2454-9452.0404006 www.arcjournals.org Turkey in Relation to EU and Russia - Triangle of Partnership or Conflicts Bulent Acma1*, Mehmet Ali Ozcobanlar2 1Anadolu University, Department of Economics, Eskisehir/Turkey. 2Department of Management, University of Warsaw, Warsaw/Poland *Corresponding Author: Bulent Acma, Anadolu University, Department of Economics, Turkey Abstract: EU-Turkey-Russia. In this research, the relationship between European Union and Turkey, an age long neighbour to the continent and an associate member of European Union since 1963, are examined and analysed. Turkey is an important ally of the union and the only Muslim country-member of NATO from the very beginning of the treaty, since it joined the organization in 1952, at the same year that Greece did. The relations between the Union and Turkey are examined from the aspect of security. The reactions of the European Union to the recent political changes in Republic of Turkey, after the 15 July 2016 failed coup- attempt, are also examined. The EU - Turkey relations after the failed coup attempt and the international impact of it are studied from the perspective of political and social influence it might have. Russia is a vital energy supplier to the Union and Turkey is a geopolitical bridge between west and east, an energy corridor standing at the crossroad of important energy markets such as Iran, Iraq and Azerbaijan. The country has also relations with Cyprus, an upcoming gas supplier and an EU member.
    [Show full text]
  • The Future Relationship Between the United Kingdom and the European Union
    THE FUTURE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE UNITED KINGDOM AND THE EUROPEAN UNION Cm 9593 THE FUTURE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE UNITED KINGDOM AND THE EUROPEAN UNION Presented to Parliament by the Prime Minister by Command of Her Majesty July 2018 Cm 9593 © Crown copyright 2018 Any enquiries regarding this publication This publication is licensed under the terms should be sent to us at of the Open Government Licence v3.0 except [email protected] where otherwise stated. To view this licence, visit nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- ISBN 978-1-5286-0701-8 government-licence/version/3 CCS0718050590-001 07/18 Where we have identified any third party copyright information you will need to obtain Printed on paper containing 75% recycled permission from the copyright holders fibre content minimum. concerned. Printed in the UK by the APS Group on This publication is available at behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s www.gov.uk/government/publications Stationery Office The future relationship between the United Kingdom and the European Union 1 Foreword by the Prime Minister In the referendum on 23 June 2016 – the largest ever democratic exercise in the United Kingdom – the British people voted to leave the European Union. And that is what we will do – leaving the Single Market and the Customs Union, ending free movement and the jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice in this country, leaving the Common Agricultural Policy and the Common Fisheries Policy, and ending the days of sending vast sums of money to the EU every year. We will take back control of our money, laws, and borders, and begin a new exciting chapter in our nation’s history.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 5 Issue 2 2013
    VOLUME 5 ISSUE 2 2013 ISSN: 2036-5438 VOL. 5, ISSUE 2, 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS SPECIAL ISSUE Regional Parliaments in the European Union: A comparison between Italy and Spain Edited by Josep M. Castellà Andreu, Eduardo Gianfrancesco, Nicola Lupo and Anna Mastromarino ESSAYS National and Regional Parliaments in the EU decision-making process, after the The Relationship between State and Treaty of Lisbon and the Euro-crisis Regional Legislatures, Starting from the NICOLA LUPO E- 1-28 Early Warning Mechanism CRISTINA FASONE E-122-155 Spanish Autonomous Communities and EU policies State accountability for violations of EU law AGUSTÍN RUIZ ROBLEDO E- 29-50 by Regions: infringement proceedings and the right of recourse The scrutiny of the principle of subsidiarity CRISTINA BERTOLINO E-156-177 by autonomous regional parliaments with particular reference to the participation of the Parliament of Catalonia in the early warning system ESTHER MARTÍN NÚÑEZ E- 51-73 Early warning and regional parliaments: in search of a new model. Suggestions from the Basque experience JOSU OSÉS ABANDO E- 74-88 The evolving role of the Italian Conference system in representing regional interest in EU decision-making ELENA GRIGLIO E- 89-121 ISSN: 2036-5438 National and Regional Parliaments in the EU decision-making process, after the Treaty of Lisbon and the Euro-crisis by Nicola Lupo Perspectives on Federalism, Vol. 5, issue 2, 2013 Except where otherwise noted content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons 2.5 Italy License E - 1 Abstract The Treaty of Lisbon increased the role of National and Regional Parliaments in the EU decision-making process, in order to compensate for some of the weaknesses of the European institutional architecture.
    [Show full text]
  • The European Union (Withdrawal Agreement) Bill Research Briefing
    National Assembly for Wales Senedd Research The European Union (Withdrawal Agreement) Bill Research Briefing January 2020 The Assembly and National Assembly for Wales The National Assembly for Wales is the Senedd Research democratically elected body that represents the interests of Wales and its people, makes laws for Wales, agrees Welsh taxes and holds The European Union the Welsh Government to account. (Withdrawal Agreement) Bill Research Briefing January 2020 Authors: Manon George, Aled Evans and Rhun Davies Paper overview: On 19 December 2019, the UK Government introduced the European Union (Withdrawal Agreement) Bill. This research paper provides an overview of the Bill including the background to its introduction, key provisions, legislative consent and the UK Government’s impact assessment. An electronic copy of this document can be found on the National Assembly website: www.assembly.wales Copies of this document can also be obtained in accessible formats including Braille, large print, audio or hard copy from: National Assembly for Wales Cardiff Bay CF99 1NA Tel: 0300 200 6219 Email: [email protected] Twitter: @SeneddResearch Blog: SeneddResearch.blog LinkedIn: Senedd Research, National Assembly for Wales © National Assembly for Wales Commission Copyright 2020 The Assembly and The text of this document may be reproduced free of charge in any format or medium providing that it is reproduced accurately and not used in a misleading or derogatory context. The material must be acknowledged as copyright of the National Assembly for Wales Commission and the title of the document specified. The European Union (Withdrawal Agreement) Bill: Research Briefing The European Union (Withdrawal Agreement) Bill: Research Briefing 5.
    [Show full text]
  • August 2019 Diplomatic Courier
    THE MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS, TRADE & COMMERCE Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Diplomatic Courier May to August, 2019 Issue 3/2019 Inside: SVG wins bid for UN Security Council Presidential Visits to SVG Winners of the 2019 MOFA Essay Writing Competition Trade Update And more... From the Desk of Foreign Minister Hon. Sir Louis Straker, Minister of Foreign Affairs, Trade & Commerce June 7, 2019 is a day that will stand out in the history of St. Vincent and the Grena- dines. Approximately a decade ago, this little nation set out on a quest to become a Non-Permanent Member of the United Nations Security Council (UNSC). Some say it couldn’t happen, but it did! The N.D.P. Opposition said it was “a fool er- rand”, but we were wiser than they. We started off by declaring our candidacy for the Security Council in 2010, challenging Colombia. The Columbian contingent The flag of Saint Vincent and the Grenadines was raised at a ceremony in front of the General Assembly pleaded with us to withdraw to avoid a building of the United Nations on 17 September 1980. At the opening meeting of the 35th session of the contest in the GRULAC group. We with- General Assembly, the country was admitted as the 154th Member of the Organization. drew our candidacy after negotiating for El Salvador came up against us, their support and that of GRULAC ten (10) -planned road map, the mission was prodded by its mentor, but we were agile years later - the only date available. accomplished. and carefully locked all the gates behind us so that they could gain no entrance.
    [Show full text]
  • Rules of Procedure
    RULES OF PROCEDURE 7th parliamentary term July 2013 EN United in diversity EN Note to the reader: In accordance with Parliament's decisions on the use of gender-neutral language in its documents, the Rules of Procedure have been adapted to take account of the guidelines on that subject approved by the High Level Group on Gender Equality and Diversity on 13 February 2008 and endorsed by the Bureau on 19 May 2008. Interpretations of the Rules (pursuant to Rule 211) are in italic script . CONTENTS TITLE I MEMBERS, PARLIAMENT BODIES AND POLITICAL GROUPS CHAPTER 1 MEMBERS OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT Rule 1 The European Parliament Rule 2 The independent mandate Rule 3 Verification of credentials Rule 4 Term of office of Members Rule 5 Privileges and immunities Rule 6 Waiver of immunity Rule 7 Procedures on immunity Rule 8 Implementation of the Statute for Members Rule 9 Members' financial interests, standards of conduct, mandatory transparency register and access to Parliament Rule 10 Internal investigations conducted by the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) Rule 11 Observers CHAPTER 2 OFFICERS OF PARLIAMENT Rule 12 Provisional Chair Rule 13 Nominations and general provisions Rule 14 Election of President - opening address Rule 15 Election of Vice-Presidents Rule 16 Election of Quaestors Rule 17 Term of office of Officers Rule 18 Vacancies Rule 19 Early termination of an office CHAPTER 3 BODIES AND DUTIES Rule 20 Duties of the President Rule 21 Duties of the Vice-Presidents Rule 22 Composition of the Bureau Rule 23 Duties of the Bureau Rule
    [Show full text]
  • Serving Scotland Better: Scotland and the United Kingdom in the 21St Century
    Serving Scotland Better: Better: Scotland Serving Serving Scotland Better: Scotland and the United Kingdom in the 21st Century Final Report – June 2009 Scotland and the United Kingdom in the 21st Century 21st the in Kingdom United the and Scotland Commission on Scottish Devolution Secretariat 1 Melville Crescent Edinburgh EH3 7HW 2009 June – Report Final Tel: (020) 7270 6759 or (0131) 244 9073 Email: [email protected] This Report is also available online at: www.commissiononscottishdevolution.org.uk © Produced by the Commission on Scottish Devolution 75% Printed on paper consisting of 75% recycled waste Presented to the Presiding Officer of the Scottish Parliament and to the Secretary of State for Scotland, on behalf of Her Majesty’s Government, June 2009 Serving Scotland Better: Scotland and the United Kingdom in the 21st Century | Final Report – June 2009 Serving Scotland Better: Scotland and the United Kingdom in the 21st Century It was a privilege to be asked to chair a Commission to consider how the Scottish Parliament could serve the people of Scotland better. It is a task that has taken just over a year and seen my colleagues and me travelling the length and breadth of Scotland. It has been very hard work – but also very rewarding. Many of the issues are complex, but at the heart of this is our desire to find ways to help improve the lives of the people of Scotland. The reward has been in meeting so many people and discussing the issues with them – at formal evidence sessions, at informal meetings, and at engagement events across the country.
    [Show full text]