DOCSLIB.ORG

Appendix 56 Management of Montana's Amphibians

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Appendix 56 Management of Montana's Amphibians Management of Montana’s Amphibians: A Review of Factors that may Present a Risk to Population Viability and Accounts on the Identification, Distribution, Taxonomy, Habitat Use, Natural History and the Status and Conservation of Individual Species A Report (Order Number 43-0343-0-0224) to: Northern Regional Office (Region 1) USDA Forest Service 200 East Broadway, P.O Box 7669 Missoula, Montana 59807 Submitted by: Bryce A. Maxell September 20, 2000 Wildlife Biology Program University of Montana Missoula, Montana 59812 Suggested Citation: Maxell, B.A. 2000. Management of Montana’s amphibians: a review of factors that may present a risk to population viability and accounts on the identification, distribution, taxonomy, habitat use, natural history, and the status and conservation of individual species. Report to USFS Region 1, Order Number 43-0343-0-0224. University of Montana, Wildlife Biology Program. Missoula, Montana. 161 pp. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Overview………………………………………………………………………………………… 5 Table of Presence and Status Ranks for Amphibians on National Forests in Montana…… 6 Table of General Habitat Types and Associated Amphibian Species in Montana…………. 7 Ecological Function and Importance………………………………………………………….. 8 Amphibian Biology and Disturbance Regimes Relevant to Management Decisions………..9 Risk Factors Relevant to the Viability of Amphibian Populations…………………………. 10 Global Amphibian Declines………………………………………………………………… 10 Timber Harvest……………………………………………………………………………… 12 Research and Management Suggestions……………………………………………… 14 Livestock Grazing…………………………………………………………………………... 15 Research and Management Suggestions……………………………………………… 16 Fire and Fire Management Activities……………………………………………………….. 17 Research and Management Suggestions……………………………………………… 18 Nonindigenous Species and Their Management……………………………………………. 19 Impacts of Nonindigenous Fish……………………………………………………….. 19 Impacts of Chemical Management of Sport Fisheries………………………………... 19 Impacts of Nonindigenous Bullfrogs…………………………………………………. 20 Impacts of Nonindigenous Species as Vectors for Pathogens………………………... 21 Impacts of Weeds and Weed and Pest Management Activities………………………. 21 Research and Management Suggestions………………………….…………………... 22 Road and Trail Development and On/Off-Road Vehicle Use………………………………. 24 Road Kill……………………………………………………………………………… 24 Off-Road Vehicle Impacts…………………………………………………………….. 24 Chemical Contamination and Sedimentation from Roads……………………………. 25 Research and Management Suggestions ……………………………………………... 25 Development and Management of Water Impoundments and Recreational Facilities……... 27 Water Impoundments…………………………………………………………………. 27 Recreational Facilities………………………………………………………………… 28 Research and Management Suggestions.……………………………………………... 28 Harvest and Commerce……………………………………………………………………... 30 Research and Management Suggestions.……………………………………………... 30 Metapopulation Impacts…………………………………………………………………….. 31 Research and Management Suggestions……………………………………………… 31 Inventory and Monitoring Efforts…………………………………………………………... 33 Standardized Data Form for Lentic Breeding Amphibian and Aquatic Reptile Surveys.….. 35 Standardized Data Form for Incidental Observations of Amphibians and Reptiles.……….. 39 Literature Cited……………………………………………………………………………… 41 (Table of Contents Continued Below) 3 Species Accounts For Species Documented in Montana……………………………………..56 Long-toed Salamander (Ambystoma macrodactylum)……………………………………… 56 Research and Management Suggestions……………………………………………… 58 Tiger Salamander (Ambystoma tigrinum)…………………………………………………... 61 Research and Management Suggestions……………………………………………… 63 Coeur d’Alene Salamander (Plethodon idahoensis)……………………………………….. 68 Research and Management Suggestions……………………………………………… 69 Rocky Mountain Tailed Frog (Ascaphus montanus) = (Ascaphus truei)…………………… 74 Research and Management Suggestions……………………………………………… 76 Plains Spadefoot (Scaphiopus bombifrons)…………………………………………………. 80 Research and Management Suggestions……………………………………………… 82 Boreal Toad (Bufo boreas boreas) = Western Toad (Bufo boreas)………………………… 85 Research and Management Suggestions……………………………………………… 89 Great Plains Toad (Bufo cognatus)………………………………………………………… 101 Research and Management Suggestions……………………………………………... 102 Canadian Toad (Bufo hemiophrys)………………………………………………………… 106 Research and Management Suggestions……………………………………………... 108 Woodhouse’s Toad (Bufo woodhousei)…………………………………………………… 110 Research and Management Suggestions……………………………………………... 112 Pacific Treefrog (Hyla regilla) = (Pseudacris regilla)…………………………………….. 115 Research and Management Suggestions……………………………………………... 117 Boreal Chorus Frog (Pseudacris maculata) = (Pseudacris triseriata maculata)………….. 121 Research and Management Suggestions……………………………………………... 123 Bullfrog (Rana catesbeiana)……………………………………………………………….. 126 Research and Management Suggestions……………………………………………... 129 Columbia Spotted Frog (Rana luteiventris)………………………………………………... 134 Research and Management Suggestions……………………………………………... 138 Northern Leopard Frog (Rana pipiens)……………………………………………………..142 Research and Management Suggestions……………………………………………... 146 Species Accounts For Species Potentially Present in Montana………….………………… 155 Idaho Giant Salamander (Dicamptodon atterimus)………………………………………... 155 Great Basin Spadefoot (Scaphiopus intermontanus)………………………………………. 158 Wood Frog (Rana sylvatica)………………………………………………………………..160 4 OVERVIEW Amphibians play important ecological roles in transferrring energy up the food chain and shaping terrestrial and aquatic communities. In addition they may serve as valuable bioindicators of the health of certain environments. Unfortunately, some amphibian populations around the world and in Montana have recently, or are currently, undergoing declines and extirpations. Direct and indirect impacts from a variety of human activities may affect the viability of amphibian populations in Montana. Because they have complex life cycles with life history stages that require specific breeding, foraging, and overwintering habitats that may be spatially separate, management actions designed to ensure population viability must consider a complex set of habitats and a complex set of human activities that may present a risk to one or more life history stage. This document summarizes current knowledge on the distribution, status, and resource needs of Montana’s amphibians in individual species accounts and reviews a variety of human activities that may pose a risk to their viability. Species that deserve special management attention include those currently listed as USFS Region 1 Sensitive Species (Coeur d’Alene salamander (Plethodon idahoensis), boreal toad (Bufo boreas boreas) and northern leopard frog (Rana pipiens)) as well as two species (plains spadefoot toad (Scaphiopus bombifrons) and the Great Plains toad (Bufo cognatus)) that currently lack a special management status, but deserve special attention because of the extremely low numbers of observations (< 40) and a lack of knowledge of their status, biology, and habitat use in the state. General activities that may pose a risk to population viability include timber harvest, grazing, fire and fire management activities, nonindigenous species and their management, road and trail development, on and off road vehicle use, development and management of water impoundments and recreational facilities, and the impact of habitat loss and fragmentation on regional sets of populations or metapopulations. While the extent of the impact of these and other activities is poorly understood a cautious approach to the management of these activities is justified in light of recent declines of amphibians around the world and in Montana. It is recommended that users of this document first use the tables at the beginning of the document to identify management status, likelihood of a species presence in the area of interest, and the complement of amphibian species that are typically found in each general habitat type. Users should then examine individual species accounts and risk factors in order gain a more thorough understanding of a species distribution, status, resource needs, factors that may pose a threat to population viability, and management actions that may mitigate these threats. Local personnel are encouraged to attend training courses in conducting surveys for amphibians in order to ensure that survey efforts are somewhat standardized. Surveys conducted to identify whether amphibians are present in a given watershed or at a given site should record survey results on the attached standardized data forms and should submit this information to the author and/or the database at the Montana Natural Heritage Program. Ideally local survey efforts should be coordinated with regional inventory efforts. 5 Presence and Status Ranks for Amphibians on National Forests in Montana Common and R1 USFS Heritage Beaverhead Lewis & Scientific Name Status Ranks -Deerlodge Bitterroot Custer Flathead Gallatin Helena Kootenai Clark Lolo Long-toed Salamander No Special S5 Present Present Not in Present Outside Present Present Present Present (Ambystoma macrodactylum) Status Part Entire Range Entire Range Part Entire Part Entire Tiger Salamander No Special S5 Present Outside Present Not in Present Outside Present Presence Outside (Ambystoma tigrinum) Status Part Range Entire Range Entire Range Part Possible Range Coeur d' Alene Salamander Sensitive S2 Outside Present Outside Outside Outside Outside Present Outside Present (Plethodon idahoensis) Species
Recommended publications
  • Identification of Mutant Genes and Introgressed Tiger Salamander

    Identification of Mutant Genes and Introgressed Tiger Salamander

    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Identification of Mutant Genes and Introgressed Tiger Salamander DNA in the Laboratory Axolotl, Received: 13 October 2016 Accepted: 19 December 2016 Ambystoma mexicanum Published: xx xx xxxx M. Ryan Woodcock1, Jennifer Vaughn-Wolfe1, Alexandra Elias2, D. Kevin Kump1, Katharina Denise Kendall1,5, Nataliya Timoshevskaya1, Vladimir Timoshevskiy1, Dustin W. Perry3, Jeramiah J. Smith1, Jessica E. Spiewak4, David M. Parichy4,6 & S. Randal Voss1 The molecular genetic toolkit of the Mexican axolotl, a classic model organism, has matured to the point where it is now possible to identify genes for mutant phenotypes. We used a positional cloning– candidate gene approach to identify molecular bases for two historic axolotl pigment phenotypes: white and albino. White (d/d) mutants have defects in pigment cell morphogenesis and differentiation, whereas albino (a/a) mutants lack melanin. We identified in white mutants a transcriptional defect in endothelin 3 (edn3), encoding a peptide factor that promotes pigment cell migration and differentiation in other vertebrates. Transgenic restoration of Edn3 expression rescued the homozygous white mutant phenotype. We mapped the albino locus to tyrosinase (tyr) and identified polymorphisms shared between the albino allele (tyra) and tyr alleles in a Minnesota population of tiger salamanders from which the albino trait was introgressed. tyra has a 142 bp deletion and similar engineered alleles recapitulated the albino phenotype. Finally, we show that historical introgression of tyra significantly altered genomic composition of the laboratory axolotl, yielding a distinct, hybrid strain of ambystomatid salamander. Our results demonstrate the feasibility of identifying genes for traits in the laboratory Mexican axolotl. The Mexican axolotl (Ambystoma mexicanum) is the primary salamander model in biological research.
  • Crawford Reservoir

    Crawford Reservoir

    Crawford Reservoir FISH SURVEY AND MANAGEMENT INFORMATION Eric Gardunio, Fish Biologist Montrose Service Center General Information: Crawford Reservoir is a popular fishery that provides angling opportunity for yellow perch, channel catfish, northern pike, rainbow trout, black crappie, and largemouth bass. This reser- voir, located in Crawford State Park, covers 414 surface acres at full capacity and is open year round to an- gling. Visit the State Parks website for information on regulations, camping, and recreation: http://parks.state.co.us/Parks/Crawford Location: 2 miles south of the town of Crawford on Hwy 92. Primary Management: Warmwater Mixed Species Lake Category 602 Amenities Previous Stocking Sportfishing Notes 2019 Black Crappie Boat Ramps (2) Rainbow Trout (10”): 9,100 Good spots include the East Campgrounds (2) Largemouth Bass (2”): 30,088 shore primarily around the Showers Clear Fork boat ramp cove or Largemouth Bass (6”): 150 anywhere with brush Visitors Center Largemouth Bass (20”): 70 Good baits include small tube Restrooms Channel Catfish (7”): 1,500 jigs and worms Parking Areas 2018 Channel Catfish Picnic Shelters Rainbow Trout (10”): 12,184 Good spots include the north Largemouth Bass (2”): 30,000 side of peninsula cove and near the dam Channel Catfish (7”): 4,250 Good baits include night 2017 crawlers and cut-bait WARNING !!! Rainbow Trout (10”): 12,184 Largemouth Bass Prevent the Spread of Largemouth Bass (2”): 20,000 Good spots include the rocky Zebra Mussels and other Largemouth Bass (16”): 70 areas near the dam and flood- Aquatic Nuisance Species ed brush and vegetation in the Channel Catfish (9”): 2,000 spring and summer.
  • Species Assessment for Boreal Toad (Bufo Boreas Boreas)

    Species Assessment for Boreal Toad (Bufo Boreas Boreas)

    SPECIES ASSESSMENT FOR BOREAL TOAD (BUFO BOREAS BOREAS ) IN WYOMING prepared by 1 2 MATT MCGEE AND DOUG KEINATH 1 Wyoming Natural Diversity Database, University of Wyoming, 1000 E. University Ave, Dept. 3381, Laramie, Wyoming 82071; 307-766-3023 2 Zoology Program Manager, Wyoming Natural Diversity Database, University of Wyoming, 1000 E. University Ave, Dept. 3381, Laramie, Wyoming 82071; 307-766-3013; [email protected] drawing by Summers Scholl prepared for United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Wyoming State Office Cheyenne, Wyoming March 2004 McGee and Keinath – Bufo boreas boreas March 2004 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................. 3 NATURAL HISTORY ........................................................................................................................... 4 Morphological Description ...................................................................................................... 4 Taxonomy and Distribution ..................................................................................................... 5 Habitat Requirements............................................................................................................. 8 General ............................................................................................................................................8 Spring-Summer ...............................................................................................................................9
  • Western Tiger Salamander,Ambystoma Mavortium

    Western Tiger Salamander,Ambystoma Mavortium

    COSEWIC Assessment and Status Report on the Western Tiger Salamander Ambystoma mavortium Southern Mountain population Prairie / Boreal population in Canada Southern Mountain population – ENDANGERED Prairie / Boreal population – SPECIAL CONCERN 2012 COSEWIC status reports are working documents used in assigning the status of wildlife species suspected of being at risk. This report may be cited as follows: COSEWIC. 2012. COSEWIC assessment and status report on the Western Tiger Salamander Ambystoma mavortium in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. xv + 63 pp. (www.registrelep-sararegistry.gc.ca/default_e.cfm). Previous report(s): COSEWIC. 2001. COSEWIC assessment and status report on the tiger salamander Ambystoma tigrinum in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. vi + 33 pp. (www.sararegistry.gc.ca/status/status_e.cfm). Schock, D.M. 2001. COSEWIC assessment and status report on the tiger salamander Ambystoma tigrinum in Canada, in COSEWIC assessment and status report on the tiger salamander Ambystoma tigrinum in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. 1-33 pp. Production note: COSEWIC would like to acknowledge Arthur Whiting for writing the status report on the Western Tiger Salamander, Ambystoma mavortium, in Canada, prepared under contract with Environment Canada. This report was overseen and edited by Kristiina Ovaska, Co-chair of the COSEWIC Amphibians and Reptiles Specialist Subcommittee. For additional copies contact: COSEWIC Secretariat c/o Canadian Wildlife Service Environment Canada Ottawa, ON K1A 0H3 Tel.: 819-953-3215 Fax: 819-994-3684 E-mail: COSEWIC/[email protected] http://www.cosewic.gc.ca Également disponible en français sous le titre Ếvaluation et Rapport de situation du COSEPAC sur la Salamandre tigrée de l’Ouest (Ambystoma mavortium) au Canada.
  • California Tiger Salamander (Ambystoma Californiense)

    California Tiger Salamander (Ambystoma Californiense)

    PETITION TO THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FISH AND GAME COMMISSION SUPPORTING INFORMATION FOR The California Tiger Salamander (Ambystoma californiense) TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.................................................................................................................1 PROCEDURAL HISTORY ................................................................................................................2 THE CESA LISTING PROCESS AND THE STANDARD FOR ACCEPTANCE OF A PETITION ...5 DESCRIPTION, BIOLOGY, AND ECOLOGY OF THE CALIFORNIA TIGER SALAMANDER ....6 I. DESCRIPTION ...............................................................................................................................6 II. TAXONOMY .................................................................................................................................7 III. REPRODUCTION AND GROWTH .....................................................................................................7 IV. MOVEMENT.................................................................................................................................9 V. FEEDING ....................................................................................................................................10 VI. POPULATION GENETICS .............................................................................................................10 HABITAT REQUIREMENTS..........................................................................................................12 DISTRIBUTION
  • Largemouth Bass, Smallmouth Bass, and Spotted Bass Management and Fishing in Pennsylvania

    Largemouth Bass, Smallmouth Bass, and Spotted Bass Management and Fishing in Pennsylvania

    Largemouth Bass, Smallmouth Bass, and Spotted Bass Management and Fishing in Pennsylvania Prepared by R. Lorantas, D. Kristine and C. Hobbs PFBC Warmwater Unit 2005 (updated 2013; R. Lorantas) Goal: Maintain or enhance largemouth, smallmouth, and spotted bass sport fishing through harvest management of naturally sustained bass populations and through habitat preservation and enhancement. Judiciously stock largemouth and smallmouth bass in compatible new and reclaimed habitats. Largemouth bass and smallmouth bass occur throughout Pennsylvania and were originally indigenous to the Ohio River and Lake Erie Drainage. Spotted bass, Pennsylvania’s most rare black bass, occurs only in the Ohio River drainage. The Ohio drainage includes the Ohio River, Allegheny River and Monongahela River drainages. Largemouth bass typically predominate in reservoirs and lakes and occur at lower densities in slow moving rivers and streams within these drainages. Smallmouth bass are typically abundant in rivers, warmwater streams and medium to large size lakes and reservoirs in these drainages. Spotted bass are most abundant within a 20 mile radius of the confluence of the Ohio, Allegheny and Monongahela Rivers. In the Lake Erie drainage largemouth bass are largely confined to Presque Isle Bay, however smallmouth bass are abundant in Lake Erie as well as Presque Isle Bay. Smallmouth bass and largemouth bass stocking by the Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission and other agencies over a century ago into the Delaware, Susquehanna, and Potomac River Drainages lead to colonization of waters within these drainages, and both species are now self­sustaining in these drainages. Most natural warm­ water lakes and man­made reservoirs in Pennsylvania contain self– sustaining largemouth and smallmouth bass populations.
  • Western Mosquitofish Gambusia Affinis ILLINOIS RANGE

    Western Mosquitofish Gambusia Affinis ILLINOIS RANGE

    western mosquitofish Gambusia affinis Kingdom: Animalia FEATURES Phylum: Chordata The western mosquitofish male grows to about one Class: Osteichthyes inch in length, while the female attains a length of Order: Cyprinodontiformes about two inches. A dark, teardrop-shaped mark is present under each eye. Black spots can be seen on Family: Poeciliidae the dorsal and tail fins. The back is gray-green to ILLINOIS STATUS brown-yellow with a dark stripe from the head to the dorsal fin. The sides are silver or gray with a common, native yellow or blue sheen. Scales are present on the head, and scales on the body have dark edges, giving a cross-hatched effect. These fish tend to die in the summer that they become mature. BEHAVIORS The western mosquitofish may be found in the southern one-half of Illinois. This fish lives in areas of little current and plentiful vegetation in swamps, sloughs, backwaters, ponds, lakes and streams. The western mosquitofish reproduces three or four times during the summer. Fertilization is internal. After mating, sperm is stored in a pouch within the female and may be used to fertilize several broods. The eggs develop inside the female and hatch in three to four weeks. Young are born alive. A brood may contain very few or several hundred fish. Young develop rapidly and may reproduce in their first summer. The western mosquitofish swims near the ILLINOIS RANGE surface, alone or in small groups, eating plant and animal materials that includes insects, spiders, small crustaceans, snails and duckweeds. © Illinois Department of Natural Resources. 2020.
  • Molecular and Morphometric Evidence for the Widespread Introduction Of

    Molecular and Morphometric Evidence for the Widespread Introduction Of

    BioInvasions Records (2017) Volume 6, Issue 3: 281–289 Open Access DOI: https://doi.org/10.3391/bir.2017.6.3.14 © 2017 The Author(s). Journal compilation © 2017 REABIC Research Article Molecular and morphometric evidence for the widespread introduction of Western mosquitofish Gambusia affinis (Baird and Girard, 1853) into freshwaters of mainland China Jiancao Gao1, Xu Ouyang1, Bojian Chen1, Jonas Jourdan2 and Martin Plath1,* 1College of Animal Science and Technology, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi 712100, P.R. China 2Department of River Ecology and Conservation, Senckenberg Research Institute and Natural History Museum Frankfurt, Gelnhausen, Germany *Corresponding author E-mail: [email protected] Received: 6 March 2017 / Accepted: 9 July 2017 / Published online: 31 July 2017 Handling editor: Marion Y.L. Wong Abstract Two North American species of mosquitofish, the Western (Gambusia affinis Baird and Girard, 1853) and Eastern mosquitofish (G. holbrooki Girard, 1859), rank amongst the most invasive freshwater fishes worldwide. While the existing literature suggests that G. affinis was introduced to mainland China, empirical evidence supporting this assumption was limited, and the possibility remained that both species were introduced during campaigns attempting to reduce vectors of malaria and dengue fever. We used combined molecular information (based on phylogenetic analyses of sequence variation of the mitochondrial cytochrome b gene) and morphometric data (dorsal and anal fin ray counts) to confirm the presence
  • Wildlife Ecology Provincial Resources

    Wildlife Ecology Provincial Resources

    MANITOBA ENVIROTHON WILDLIFE ECOLOGY PROVINCIAL RESOURCES !1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We would like to thank: Olwyn Friesen (PhD Ecology) for compiling, writing, and editing this document. Subject Experts and Editors: Barbara Fuller (Project Editor, Chair of Test Writing and Education Committee) Lindsey Andronak (Soils, Research Technician, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada) Jennifer Corvino (Wildlife Ecology, Senior Park Interpreter, Spruce Woods Provincial Park) Cary Hamel (Plant Ecology, Director of Conservation, Nature Conservancy Canada) Lee Hrenchuk (Aquatic Ecology, Biologist, IISD Experimental Lakes Area) Justin Reid (Integrated Watershed Management, Manager, La Salle Redboine Conservation District) Jacqueline Monteith (Climate Change in the North, Science Consultant, Frontier School Division) SPONSORS !2 Introduction to wildlife ...................................................................................7 Ecology ....................................................................................................................7 Habitat ...................................................................................................................................8 Carrying capacity.................................................................................................................... 9 Population dynamics ..............................................................................................................10 Basic groups of wildlife ................................................................................11
  • Herpetofauna and Aquatic Macro-Invertebrate Use of the Kino Environmental Restoration Project (KERP)

    Herpetofauna and Aquatic Macro-Invertebrate Use of the Kino Environmental Restoration Project (KERP)

    Herpetofauna and Aquatic Macro-invertebrate Use of the Kino Environmental Restoration Project (KERP) Tucson, Pima County, Arizona Prepared for Pima County Regional Flood Control District Prepared by EPG, Inc. JANUARY 2007 - Plma County Regional FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT MEMORANDUM Water Resources Regional Flood Control District DATE: January 5,2007 TO: Distribution FROM: Julia Fonseca SUBJECT: Kino Ecosystem Restoration Project Report The Ed Pastor Environmental Restoration ProjectiKino Ecosystem Restoration Project (KERP) is becoming an extraordinary urban wildlife resource. As such, the Pima County Regional Flood Control District (PCRFCD) contracted with the Environmental Planning Group (EPG) to gather observations of reptiles, amphibians, and aquatic insects at KERP. Water quality was also examined. The purpose of the work was to provide baseline data on current wildlife use of the KERP site, and to assess water quality for post-project aquatic wildlife conditions. I additionally requested sampling of macroinvertebrates at Agua Caliente Park and Sweetwater Wetlands in hopes that the differences in aquatic wildlife among the three sites might provide insights into the different habitats offered by KERF'. The results One of the most important wildlife benefits that KERP provides is aquatic habitat without predatory bullfrogs and non- native fish. Most other constructed ponds and wetlands in Tucson, such as the Sweetwater Wetlands and Agua Caliente pond, are fuIl of non-native predators which devastate native fish, amphibians and aquatic reptiles. The KERP Wetlands may provide an opportunity for reestablishing declining native herpetofauna. Provided that non- native fish, bullfrogs or crayfish are not introduced, KERP appears to provide adequate habitat for Sonoran Mud Turtles (Kinosternon sonoriense), Lowland Leopard Frogs (Rana yavapaiensis), and Mexican Gartersnakes (Tharnnophis eques) and Southwestern Woodhouse Toad (Bufo woodhousii australis).
  • Recovery Strategy for the Pacific Giant Salamander (Dicamptodon Tenebrosus) in British Columbia

    Recovery Strategy for the Pacific Giant Salamander (Dicamptodon Tenebrosus) in British Columbia

    British Columbia Recovery Strategy Series Recovery Strategy for the Pacific Giant Salamander (Dicamptodon tenebrosus) in British Columbia Prepared by the Pacific Giant Salamander Recovery Team April 2010 About the British Columbia Recovery Strategy Series This series presents the recovery strategies that are prepared as advice to the Province of British Columbia on the general strategic approach required to recover species at risk. The Province prepares recovery strategies to meet its commitments to recover species at risk under the Accord for the Protection of Species at Risk in Canada, and the Canada – British Columbia Agreement on Species at Risk. What is recovery? Species at risk recovery is the process by which the decline of an endangered, threatened, or extirpated species is arrested or reversed, and threats are removed or reduced to improve the likelihood of a species’ persistence in the wild. What is a recovery strategy? A recovery strategy represents the best available scientific knowledge on what is required to achieve recovery of a species or ecosystem. A recovery strategy outlines what is and what is not known about a species or ecosystem; it also identifies threats to the species or ecosystem, and what should be done to mitigate those threats. Recovery strategies set recovery goals and objectives, and recommend approaches to recover the species or ecosystem. Recovery strategies are usually prepared by a recovery team with members from agencies responsible for the management of the species or ecosystem, experts from other agencies, universities, conservation groups, aboriginal groups, and stakeholder groups as appropriate. What’s next? In most cases, one or more action plan(s) will be developed to define and guide implementation of the recovery strategy.
  • Biological Inventory and Evaluation of Conservation Strategies in Southwest Playa Wetlands

    Biological Inventory and Evaluation of Conservation Strategies in Southwest Playa Wetlands

    Biological Inventory and Evaluation of Conservation Strategies in Southwest Playa Wetlands Final Report to the Nebraska Game and Parks Commission and the Playa Lakes Joint Venture August 2007 Alison Banks Cariveau, Research Division Director Lacrecia Johnson, Playa Survey Project Leader Robert Sparks, Research Biologist Rocky Mountain Bird Observatory 14500 Lark Bunting Lane Brighton, CO 80603 303.659.4348 www.rmbo.org ROCKY MOUNTAIN BIRD OBSERVATORY The mission of the Rocky Mountain Bird Observatory (RMBO) is to conserve birds of the Rocky Mountains, Great Plains, and Intermountain West and the habitats on which they depend through research, monitoring, education, and outreach. RMBO practices a multi- faceted approach to bird conservation that integrates scientific research and monitoring studies with education and outreach programs to bring bird conservation issues to the public and other conservation partners. RMBO works closely with state and federal natural resource agencies, private landowners, schools, and other nonprofit organizations. RMBO accomplishes its mission by working in four areas: Research : RMBO studies avian responses to habitat conditions, ecological processes, and management actions to provide scientific information that guides bird conservation actions. Monitoring : RMBO monitors the distribution and abundance of birds through long-term, broad-scale monitoring programs that track population trends for birds of the region. Education : RMBO provides active, experiential, education programs for K-12 students in order to create an awareness and appreciation for birds, with the goal of understanding the need for bird conservation. Outreach : RMBO shares the latest information in land management and bird conservation practices with private landowners, land managers, and resource professionals at natural resource agencies.