DOCSLIB.ORG

'We Are All Animals': the Emergence of The

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

‘WE ARE ALL ANIMALS’: THE EMERGENCE OF THE GRASSROOTS NONHUMAN ANIMAL RIGHTS MOVEMENT IN İSTANBUL by SILVIA ILONKA WOLF Submitted to the Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts SABANCI UNIVERSITY AUGUST 2015 © Silvia Ilonka Wolf 2015 All Rights Reserved ABSTRACT ‘WE ARE ALL ANIMALS’: THE EMERGENCE OF THE GRASSROOTS NONHUMAN ANIMAL RIGHTS MOVEMENT IN İSTANBUL Silvia Ilonka Wolf Turkish Studies, M.A. Thesis, 2015 Supervisor: Prof. Dr. Ayşe Öncü Keywords: nonhuman animal rights movement, veganism, conversion, activism, alliance politics Within merely a few years time a radical nonhuman animal rights movement with an explicitly vegan character has appeared on the activist scene in Istanbul and in other locations in Turkey. This thesis looks into some of its characteristics. How does a carnist turn into a nonhuman animal rights activist; what are the patterns that characterize the transition to a vegan lifestyle and recruitment into the animal rights movement? And what do these findings imply for the collective action frames that vegan missionaries in Istanbul employ to convert and recruit new people? Generally internal divisions within the nonhuman animal rights movement in Istanbul are based on differences regarding collective action frames, which lead activists to apply certain tactics and reject others. I suggest that the relatively late emergence of the animal rights movement in Turkey has enabled activists to look critically at what has gone wrong in the animal rights movement elsewhere. The critical perspective by animal rights activists in Turkey has led to the movement’s radical character and the concern on the part of activists to apply the “right” tactics. This also explains the high degree of awareness regarding other forms of discrimination than speciesism, such as sexism, heterosexism, racism, nationalism, and misanthropy. Nevertheless, internal frame disputes reveal that work remains to be done when it comes to avoiding other forms of discrimination within the movement. Critical intersectional voices are on the rise; pushing the movement for further self-improvement. iv ÖZET ‘HEPİMİZ HAYVANIZ’: TABANLI İNSAN OLMAYAN HAYVAN HAKLARI HAREKETİNİN ORTAYA ÇIKIŞI Silvia Ilonka Wolf Türkiye Çalışmaları, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, 2015 Tez Danışması: Doç. Dr. Ayşe Öncü Anahtar Sözcükler: insan olmayan hayvan hakları, veganizm, dönüşme, aktivizm, ittifak siyaseti Sadece birkaç yıl içerisinde, özellikle vegan bir karaktere sahip radikal bir insan olmayan hayvan hakları hareketi İstanbul’un aktivist ortamında ve Türkiye’nin diğer bölgelerinde ortaya çıktı. Bu tez hareketin bazı özelliklerini incelemektedir. Bir karnist nasıl insan olmayan hayvan hakları aktivistine dönüşür; vegan yaşam tarzına ve hayvan hakları hareketine dahil olma sürecini niteleyen biçimler nelerdir? Bu bulgular İstanbul’daki vegan misyonerlerin harekete yeni insanlar katmak için uyguladıkları kolektif eylem planları hakkında ne ifade eder? Genellikle İstanbul’daki insan olmayan hayvan hakları hareketi içerisindeki fikir ayrılıkları kolektif eylem planları üzerinden şekillenmekte ve bu durum bazı aktivistlerin belli taktiklere yönelirken diğerlerini reddetmesine yol açmaktadır. Benim görüşüm, Türkiye’deki hayvan hakları hareketinin göreceli olarak geç ortaya çıkışı aktivistlerin eleştirel bir bakış açısıylaş diğer bölgelerdeki hayvan hakları hareketlerinin hatalarını incelemelerine olanak tanımıştır. Türkiye’deki hayvan hakları aktivistlerinin eleştirel bakışı hareketin radikal bir yapıya bürünmesine ve “doğru” taktikleri uygulama konusunda daha dikkatli olmalarına neden olmuştur. Bu durum aynı zamanda türcülük dışındaki cinsiyetçilik, eşcinsel ayrımcılığı, ırkçılık, milliyetçilik, misantrofi gibi diğer ayrımcılık formlarına dair yüksek farkındalığı da açıklamaktadır. Bununla birlikte, hareket içi planlardaki anlaşmazlıklar hareket içindeki diğer ayrımcılık formlarından kaçınmak için hala yapılması gerekenler olduğunu ortaya çıkarmaktadır. Çevreler arası eleştirel sesler yükseliştedir ve hareketi gelişme adına ileriye götürmektedir. v I dedicate this thesis to my beloved parents. To my father, Andre Wolf, who is physically not with us on Earth anymore but whom I always carry in my heart. And to my mother, Eva Zsuzsanna Tuboly, whose unconditional support and presence I deeply appreciate and enjoy. vi ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS In the two years that I spent at Sabancı University I have learned much more than I could imagine. I thank Sabancı University for this life-changing opportunity: for offering me a scholarship that enabled me to live for free at the campus, for the travel grant when I participated on the ASCA (Amsterdam School for Cultural Analysis) workshop 2015, and for giving me the wonderful experience of being a teaching assistant in SPS (Humanity and Society). SPS truly broadened my horizons and I often recall Metin Kunt’s and Saygın Salgırlı’s inspiring lectures about world history. Another professor that I am highly indebted to is Halil Berktay. I thank him for every single lecture that he gave and for everything else that he has helped me with. His passion for history, his infinite knowledge on so many topics, and his exceptional teaching skills will always be an example for me. I thank Ersin Kalaycıoğlu for introducing me to Turkish Politics and for indirectly motivating me (through the final paper for the course) to participate on the WOCMES (World Congress for Middle Eastern Studies) 2014 in Ankara. I am grateful to Banu Karaca who encouraged me to write about the nonhuman animal rights movement in Turkey. Also Leyla Neyzi, whose passion for and dedication to sociological research I so admire, has greatly inspired and motivated me. Of all the professors at Sabancı University I owe the most to Ayşe Öncü, my thesis supervisor. Her expertise in sociological research, her clever insights, and her endless enthusiasm have been invaluable for me. Without her this thesis would not have been written. I thank her deeply for introducing me to sociology in a practical way. She taught me things that I could not have discovered just through books. I also want to thank Ayşe Gül Altınay and Ozan Zeybek for reading and commenting on my thesis. Their insightful feedback and suggestions regarding my research will certainly guide me in my journey to a PhD position. The staff of the journal Interface has also greatly contributed to this thesis. I thank them, and in particular Laurence Cox, for giving me a chance to publish my paper. Moreover, the comments that I received on the draft version did not only enable me to significantly improve that paper, they also guided me through the research for my thesis. I am forever thankful for this assistance and encouragement. I would like to express my gratitude to ASCA (Amsterdam School for Cultural Analysis) for letting me participate on their 2015 workshop themed ‘Politics of Attachment’. There I met Eva Meijer, who gave me useful comments on my paper. Besides, by reading Eva’s impressive work on human-animal relations (and also thanks to her suggestions and things she shared with me) I came across academic sources that have highly influenced my thesis. I would like to thank her for that. Special thanks to Priscilla Andrea Alamos Concha for letting me present my paper in her panel at WOCMES 2014 in Ankara. Not only did she give me an amazing opportunity, she also vii encouraged me a lot in my academic ambitions. And even though we spent very little time together, I found in her a wonderful friend. I sincerely thank Oğuzhan Çolak for helping me in the final days of the thesis with transcriptions and translations. Without his punctual work my thesis would have been left unfinished and incomplete. I thank Emine Arı for helping me with standardization issues and Ali Alipour for helping with style-related issues. From the bottom of my heart I want to thank all the wonderful friends that I have met in Sabancı for supporting me, for having been on this Sabancı journey together, or for just being there. In particular Sona Khachatryan with whom I have numerous times shared my enthusiasm for Sabancı’s education. Sona, thank you for helping me with translations from Turkish (I hope one day my Turkish will be as good as yours!) and thesis standardization issues. Thank you for always believing in me and for encouraging me to think outside the box and to push the limits of what I thought was possible. But most of all thank you for being the wonderful person you are and for having been part of my Sabancı time. It would not have been the same without you. My dear friend Sultan Toprak: thank you for the fun cooperation as my teaching assistantship partner in my first year of study. How I miss those times. And Aslı Unan, I really enjoyed our working together in my second year of study. Thanks for everything. Laleh Eskandarian, I am so grateful that we became roommates. Thank you for your friendship and for the delicious Iranian rice cakes and other dishes. You introduced me to a whole new world. Handan Balkan, we started at Sabancı together and I am so happy to know you. It was fun to pass through all the different stages together. Thanks for your friendship and for helping me out with Turkish when I needed help. Robert Alan Elliot, your enthusiasm for history and languages along with your ambition and positive energy truly inspire me. It was great to work with you during the summer semester for SPS. Thanks for all the good times; your company has certainly contributed to a joyful final semester at Sabancı. Serkan Ilaslaner, thank you for all the interesting conversations and for giving me useful suggestions for one of my thesis chapters. Without your advice that chapter may have failed. I would like to thank other Sabancı friends too, among them Kübra Iyiiş, Fahad Sohrab Yousafzai, Marloes Cornelissen, and Bahar Imaanlou, for bringing color to the campus (and other people whom I met here and whom I do not all mention by name, thank you all!). I also want to thank Kübra for being so kind to translate my abstract to Turkish.
Recommended publications
  • Are Illegal Direct Actions by Animal Rights Activists Ethically Vigilante?

    Are Illegal Direct Actions by Animal Rights Activists Ethically Vigilante?

    260 BETWEEN THE SPECIES Is the Radical Animal Rights Movement Ethically Vigilante? ABSTRACT Following contentious debates around the status and justifiability of illegal direct actions by animal rights activists, we introduce a here- tofore unexplored perspective that argues they are neither terrorist nor civilly disobedient but ethically vigilante. Radical animal rights movement (RARM) activists are vigilantes for vulnerable animals and their rights. Hence, draconian measures by the constitutional state against RARM vigilantes are both disproportionate and ille- gitimate. The state owes standing and toleration to such principled vigilantes, even though they are self-avowed anarchists and anti-stat- ists—unlike civil disobedients—repudiating allegiance to the con- stitutional order. This requires the state to acknowledge the ethical nature of challenges to its present regime of toleration, which assigns special standing to illegal actions in defense of human equality, but not equality and justice between humans and animals. Michael Allen East Tennessee State University Erica von Essen Environmental Communications Division Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Volume 22, Issue 1 Fall 2018 http://digitalcommons.calpoly.edu/bts/ 261 Michael Allen and Erica von Essen Introduction We explore the normative status of illegal actions under- taken by the Radical Animal Rights Movement (RARM), such as animal rescue, trespass, and sabotage as well as confronta- tion and intimidation. RARM typically characterizes these ac- tions as examples of direct action rather than civil disobedience (Milligan 2015, Pellow 2014). Moreover, many RARM activ- ists position themselves as politically anarchist, anti-statist, and anti-capitalist (Best 2014, Pellow 2014). Indeed, the US and UK take these self-presentations at face value, responding to RARM by introducing increasingly draconian legislation that treats them as terrorists (Best 2014, McCausland, O’Sullivan and Brenton 2013, O’Sullivan 2011, Pellow 2014).
  • Foucault and Animals

    Foucault and Animals

    Foucault and Animals Edited by Matthew Chrulew, Curtin University Dinesh Joseph Wadiwel, The University of Sydney LEIDEN | BOSTON For use by the Author only | © 2017 Koninklijke Brill NV Contents Foreword vii List of Contributors viii Editors’ Introduction: Foucault and Animals 1 Matthew Chrulew and Dinesh Joseph Wadiwel PART 1 Discourse and Madness 1 Terminal Truths: Foucault’s Animals and the Mask of the Beast 19 Joseph Pugliese 2 Chinese Dogs and French Scapegoats: An Essay in Zoonomastics 37 Claire Huot 3 Violence and Animality: An Investigation of Absolute Freedom in Foucault’s History of Madness 59 Leonard Lawlor 4 The Order of Things: The Human Sciences are the Event of Animality 87 Saïd Chebili (Translated by Matthew Chrulew and Jefffrey Bussolini) PART 2 Power and Discipline 5 “Taming the Wild Profusion of Existing Things”? A Study of Foucault, Power, and Human/Animal Relationships 107 Clare Palmer 6 Dressage: Training the Equine Body 132 Natalie Corinne Hansen For use by the Author only | © 2017 Koninklijke Brill NV vi CONTENTS 7 Foucault’s Menagerie: Cock Fighting, Bear Baiting, and the Genealogy of Human-Animal Power 161 Alex Mackintosh PART 3 Science and Biopolitics 8 The Birth of the Laboratory Animal: Biopolitics, Animal Experimentation, and Animal Wellbeing 193 Robert G. W. Kirk 9 Animals as Biopolitical Subjects 222 Matthew Chrulew 10 Biopower, Heterogeneous Biosocial Collectivities and Domestic Livestock Breeding 239 Lewis Holloway and Carol Morris PART 4 Government and Ethics 11 Apum Ordines: Of Bees and Government 263 Craig McFarlane 12 Animal Friendship as a Way of Life: Sexuality, Petting and Interspecies Companionship 286 Dinesh Joseph Wadiwel 13 Foucault and the Ethics of Eating 317 Chloë Taylor Afterword 339 Paul Patton Index 345 For use by the Author only | © 2017 Koninklijke Brill NV CHAPTER 8 The Birth of the Laboratory Animal: Biopolitics, Animal Experimentation, and Animal Wellbeing Robert G.
  • "Go Veg" Campaigns of US Animal Rights Organizations

    "Go Veg" Campaigns of US Animal Rights Organizations

    Society and Animals 18 (2010) 163-182 brill.nl/soan Framing Animal Rights in the “Go Veg” Campaigns of U.S. Animal Rights Organizations Carrie Packwood Freeman Georgia State University [email protected] Abstract How much do animal rights activists talk about animal rights when they attempt to persuade America’s meat-lovers to stop eating nonhuman animals? Th is study serves as the basis for a unique evaluation and categorization of problems and solutions as framed by fi ve major U.S. animal rights organizations in their vegan/food campaigns. Th e fi ndings reveal that the organiza- tions framed the problems as: cruelty and suff ering; commodifi cation; harm to humans and the environment; and needless killing. To solve problems largely blamed on factory farming, activists asked consumers to become “vegetarian” (meaning vegan) or to reduce animal product con- sumption, some requesting “humane” reforms. While certain messages supported animal rights, promoting veganism and respect for animals’ subject status, many frames used animal welfare ideology to achieve rights solutions, conservatively avoiding a direct challenge to the dominant human/animal dualism. In support of ideological authenticity, this paper recommends that vegan campaigns emphasize justice, respect, life, freedom, environmental responsibility, and a shared animality. Keywords animal rights, campaigns, farm animal, framing, ideology, vegan, vegetarian How much do or should animal rights activists talk about animal rights when they attempt to persuade America’s meat-lovers to stop eating animals? As participants in a counterhegemonic social movement, animal rights organiza- tions are faced with the discursive challenge of redefi ning accepted practices, such as farming and eating nonhuman animals, as socially unacceptable practices.
  • It's a (Two-)Culture Thing: the Laterial Shift to Liberation

    It's a (Two-)Culture Thing: the Laterial Shift to Liberation

    Animal Issues, Vol 4, No. 1, 2000 It's a (Two-)Culture Thing: The Lateral Shift to Liberation Barry Kew rom an acute and, some will argue, a harsh, a harsh, fantastic or even tactically naive F naive perspective, this article examines examines animal liberation, vegetarianism vegetarianism and veganism in relation to a bloodless culture ideal. It suggests that the movement's repeated anomalies, denial of heritage, privileging of vegetarianism, and other concessions to bloody culture, restrict rather than liberate the full subversionary and revelatory potential of liberationist discourse, and with representation and strategy implications. ‘Only the profoundest cultural needs … initially caused adult man [sic] to continue to drink cow milk through life’.1 In The Social Construction of Nature, Klaus Eder develops a useful concept of two cultures - the bloody and the bloodless. He understands the ambivalence of modernity and the relationship to nature as resulting from the perpetuation of a precarious equilibrium between the ‘bloodless’ tradition from within Judaism and the ‘bloody’ tradition of ancient Greece. In Genesis, killing entered the world after the fall from grace and initiated a complex and hierarchically-patterned system of food taboos regulating distance between nature and culture. But, for Eder, it is in Israel that the reverse process also begins, in the taboo on killing. This ‘civilizing’ process replaces the prevalent ancient world practice of 1 Calvin. W. Schwabe, ‘Animals in the Ancient World’ in Aubrey Manning and James Serpell, (eds), Animals and Human Society: Changing Perspectives (Routledge, London, 1994), p.54. 1 Animal Issues, Vol 4, No. 1, 2000 human sacrifice by animal sacrifice, this by sacrifices of the field, and these by money paid to the sacrificial priests.2 Modern society retains only a very broken connection to the Jewish tradition of the bloodless sacrifice.
  • Review of the Great Awakening

    Review of the Great Awakening

    Journal of Buddhist Ethics ISSN 1076-9005 http://jbe.gold.ac.uk/ The Great Compassion: Buddhism and Animal Rights Reviewed by L. A. Kemmerer Montana State University, Billings, MT Email: [email protected] Copyright Notice: Digital copies of this work may be made and distributed provided no change is made and no alteration is made to the content. Reproduction in any other format, with the ex- ception of a single copy for private study, requires the written permission of the author. All enquiries to: [email protected] Review of The Great Compassion: Buddhism and Animal Rights L. A. Kemmerer* The Great Compassion: Buddhism and Animal Rights. By Norm Phelps. New York: Lantern Press, 2004. 208 pages. Paperback. ISBN 1590560698. The first precept of Buddhism forbids the taking of life; eating flesh re- quires killing animals. Buddhist ethics are rooted in compassion, and ani- mal industries in the West are shockingly cruel. So why do so many West- ern Buddhists eat meat, and even defend the practice? In The Great Com- passion: Buddhism and Animal Rights (Lantern 2004), Norm Phelps ex- plores Buddhist ethics in relation to dietary practices. There is little point in discussing Buddhism, compassion, and diet if one does not know about animal industries, so Phelps provides a brief historic view of factory farming, along with statistics and an explanation of common practices in several animal industries, such as dairy, broiler hens, eggs, veal, beef, and hogs. “Ten billion cows, pigs, sheep, goats, * Montana State University, Billings, MT. E-mail: [email protected] Kemmerer, Review of The Great Compassion 94 chickens, ducks, and turkeys are killed for food and fabric.
  • Meat and Morality: Alternatives to Factory Farming

    Meat and Morality: Alternatives to Factory Farming

    J Agric Environ Ethics (2010) 23:455–468 DOI 10.1007/s10806-009-9226-x Meat and Morality: Alternatives to Factory Farming Evelyn B. Pluhar Accepted: 30 November 2009 / Published online: 18 December 2009 Ó Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009 Abstract Scientists have shown that the practice of factory farming is an increasingly urgent danger to human health, the environment, and nonhuman animal welfare. For all these reasons, moral agents must consider alternatives. Vegetarian food production, humane food animal farming, and in-vitro meat production are all explored from a variety of ethical perspectives, especially utilitarian and rights- based viewpoints, all in the light of current U.S. and European initiatives in the public and private sectors. It is concluded that vegetarianism and potentially in-vitro meat production are the best-justified options. Keywords Factory farming Á Humane farming Á In-vitro meat production Á Rights theory Á Utilitarianism Á Vegetarianism factory farming (FAK-tuh-ree FAHR-ming) noun: an industrialized system of producing meat, eggs, and milk in large-scale facilities where the animal is treated as a machine (Wordsmith 2008) After several years of receiving ‘‘A Word for the Day’’ from a dictionary service, the author was interested to see the above definition pop up in the email inbox. The timing was perhaps not coincidental. In spring 2008, the Pew Commission on Industrial Farm Animal Production completed a two-year investigation of factory- farming practices in the United States. At the end of its 1,100-page report, the Commission recommended a ten-year timeline for the termination of the most intensive production techniques, including battery cages, gestation crates, and force- feeding birds to harvest their fatty livers for foie gras (Hunger Notes 2008).
  • Animals Liberation Philosophy and Policy Journal Volume 5, Issue 2

    Animals Liberation Philosophy and Policy Journal Volume 5, Issue 2

    AAnniimmaallss LLiibbeerraattiioonn PPhhiilloossoopphhyy aanndd PPoolliiccyy JJoouurrnnaall VVoolluummee 55,, IIssssuuee 22 -- 22000077 Animal Liberation Philosophy and Policy Journal Volume 5, Issue 2 2007 Edited By: Steven Best, Chief Editor ____________________________________________________________ TABLE OF CONTENTS Lev Tolstoy and the Freedom to Choose One’s Own Path Andrea Rossing McDowell Pg. 2-28 Jewish Ethics and Nonhuman Animals Lisa Kemmerer Pg. 29-47 Deliberative Democracy, Direct Action, and Animal Advocacy Stephen D’Arcy Pg. 48-63 Should Anti-Vivisectionists Boycott Animal-Tested Medicines? Katherine Perlo Pg. 64-78 A Note on Pedagogy: Humane Education Making a Difference Piers Bierne and Meena Alagappan Pg. 79-94 BOOK REVIEWS _________________ Fast Food Nation: The Dark Side of the All-American Meal, by Eric Schlosser (2005) Reviewed by Lisa Kemmerer Pg. 95-101 Eternal Treblinka: Our Treatment of Animals and the Holocaust, by Charles Patterson (2002) Reviewed by Steven Best Pg. 102-118 The Longest Struggle: Animal Advocacy from Pythagoras to PETA, by Norm Phelps (2007) Reviewed by Steven Best Pg. 119-130 Journal for Critical Animal Studies, Volume V, Issue 2, 2007 Lev Tolstoy and the Freedom to Choose One’s Own Path Andrea Rossing McDowell, PhD It is difficult to be sat on all day, every day, by some other creature, without forming an opinion about them. On the other hand, it is perfectly possible to sit all day every day, on top of another creature and not have the slightest thought about them whatsoever. -- Douglas Adams, Dirk Gently’s Holistic Detective Agency (1988) Committed to the idea that the lives of humans and animals are inextricably linked, Lev Nikolayevich Tolstoy (1828–1910) promoted—through literature, essays, and letters—the animal world as another venue in which to practice concern and kindness, consequently leading to more peaceful, consonant human relations.
  • Econ 243: Political Economy of Gender, Race, and Class

    Econ 243: Political Economy of Gender, Race, and Class

    THE POLITICAL ECONOMY OF GENDER, RACE AND CLASS Economics 243, Wellesley College, Spring 2015 Professor Julie Matthaei Office Hours: Economics Department Thurs. 5:30-6:30 PNE 423, x2181 & by appointment Emily Grandjean, Teaching Assistant The Roots of Violence: Wealth without work, Pleasure without conscience, Knowledge without character, Commerce without morality, Science without humanity, Worship without sacrifice, Politics without principles. -- Mahatma Gandhi Objectivity is male subjectivity, made unquestionable. --Adrienne Rich No problem can be solved by the level of consciousness that created it. --Albert Einstein Be the change you want to see in the world. --Mahatma Gandhi Youth should be radical. Youth should demand change in the world. Youth should not accept the old order if the world is to move on. But the old orders should not be moved easily — certainly not at the mere whim or behest of youth. There must be clash and if youth hasn’t enough force or fervor to produce the clash the world grows stale and stagnant and sour in decay. --William Allen White If to change ourselves is to change our worlds, and the relation is reciprocal, then the project of history making is never a distant one but always right here, on the borders of our sensing, thinking, feeling, moving bodies. --J.K. Gibson-Graham Power at its best is love implementing the demands of justice. Justice at its best is love correcting everything that stands against love. --Martin Luther King Give a man a gun, he can rob a bank. Give a man a bank, and he can rob the world.
  • To Download and Print a Product Information Sheet

    To Download and Print a Product Information Sheet

    GENERATION V The Complete Guide to Going, Being, and Staying Vegan as a Teenager Claire Askew Going vegan is the single most important thing you can do if you want to get serious about animal rights. Yet, going vegan isn’t always easy when you’re young. You’re living under your parents’ roof, you probably don’t buy your own groceries, and your friends, family, and teachers might look at you like you’re nuts. So, how do you do it? In this essential guide for the curious, aspiring, and current teenage vegan, Claire Askew draws on her years of experience as a teenage vegan and provides the tools for going vegan and staying vegan as a teen. Full of advice, stories, tips, and resources, Claire covers topics like: how to go vegan and stay sane; how to tell your parents so they don’t freak out; how to deal with friends who don’t get it; how to eat and stay healthy as a vegan; how to get out of dissection assignments in school; and tons more. Whether you’re a teenager who is thinking about going vegan or already vegan, this is the ultimate resource, written by someone SUBJECT CATEGORY like you, for you. FOOd-VegetARiAniSM/ PhilOSOPhY-ethicS ABOUT THE AUTHOR PRICE Claire Askew was born in 1990 and went vegan a few days after her $14.95 fifteenth birthday. After growing up in the Midwest, she is currently studying English and gender at a small liberal arts college in Portland, ISBN OR. She has been featured in VegNews magazine, the Vegetarian 978-1-60486-338-3 Journal, the Kansas City Star, and several podcasts, as well as the 2009 edition of Fiske Real College Essays That Work.
  • MAC1 Abstracts – Oral Presentations

    MAC1 Abstracts – Oral Presentations

    Oral Presentation Abstracts OP001 Rights, Interests and Moral Standing: a critical examination of dialogue between Regan and Frey. Rebekah Humphreys Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom This paper aims to assess R. G. Frey’s analysis of Leonard Nelson’s argument (that links interests to rights). Frey argues that claims that animals have rights or interests have not been established. Frey’s contentions that animals have not been shown to have rights nor interests will be discussed in turn, but the main focus will be on Frey’s claim that animals have not been shown to have interests. One way Frey analyses this latter claim is by considering H. J. McCloskey’s denial of the claim and Tom Regan’s criticism of this denial. While Frey’s position on animal interests does not depend on McCloskey’s views, he believes that a consideration of McCloskey’s views will reveal that Nelson’s argument (linking interests to rights) has not been established as sound. My discussion (of Frey’s scrutiny of Nelson’s argument) will centre only on the dialogue between Regan and Frey in respect of McCloskey’s argument. OP002 Can Special Relations Ground the Privileged Moral Status of Humans Over Animals? Robert Jones California State University, Chico, United States Much contemporary philosophical work regarding the moral considerability of nonhuman animals involves the search for some set of characteristics or properties that nonhuman animals possess sufficient for their robust membership in the sphere of things morally considerable. The most common strategy has been to identify some set of properties intrinsic to the animals themselves.
  • Animal Welfare Attitudes of Pet Owners: an Investigation in Central and Western Parts of Turkey

    Animal Welfare Attitudes of Pet Owners: an Investigation in Central and Western Parts of Turkey

    Kocatepe Veterinary Journal Kocatepe Vet J. (2020) 13(4)388-395 RESEARCH ARTICLE DOI: 10.30607/kvj.794748 Animal Welfare Attitudes of Pet Owners: An Investigation in Central and Western Parts of Turkey Gizem Sıla SARIAL KUBİLAY1, Zehra BOZKURT2 1 Avenue Aristide Briand, 38600 Fontaine, France 2Afyon Kocatepe University, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Animal Husbadry, 03200, Afyonkarahisar, Turkey ABSTRACT Today with the start of global pandemics, the concept of “One health-One welfare” is becoming a fact of life as never before. Responsible ownership and good care duty do affect the health and welfare of pet animals, one of the stakeholders of social life. In this study, pet owners' attitudes towards animal welfare were examined. The research was carried out in Ġzmir, Ankara and Afyonkarahisar that are located in the Central and Western parts of Turkey. Animal Welfare Attitude Scale (AWAS) was applied to pet owners who voluntarily participated in the study. According to the results obtained in the cognitive dimension of the AWAS, pet owners think that animal welfare is affected mostly by housing, feeding and health conditions, and less by slaughter, sacrifice or naming of animals. Findings regarding the behavioral dimension demonstrated that pet owners treat their pets and street animals well but they do not support non-governmental organizations (NGO) working for animal rights and animal protection and they are not willing to purchase and pay more for foods produced under animal friendly standartds. Also, it has been observed that pet owners believe animals are sensitive beings and have rights like humans, but they agree little with the judgment that animals are created for humans.
  • Exercises Final Edit

    Exercises Final Edit

    _______________________________________________________ THE SIMPLICITY EXERCISES A SOURCEBOOK FOR SIMPLICITY EDUCATORS Mark A Burch Simplicity Institute Report 12k, 2012 SPECIAL ISSUE ____________________ SIMPLICITY INSTITUTE PRAISE FOR THE SIMPLICITY EXERCISES: Mark Burch is the real deal—it’s evident from The Simplicity Exercises that he’s spent a lifetime integrating simple living principles into his own life, and luckily for the rest of us, has developed and honed exercises to help others do the same. Seasoned voluntary simplicity facilitators will appreciate how thorough and well-presented these activities are. In fact, the material is so well-thought out that informal educators new to simple living could use Mark’s book with confidence. If you’re ready to change your game plan or help others do so, this book ofers real transformative opportunities. C. Jones, M. Div., Adult Educator and Simple Living Enthusiast Refraining from adding to the critique of current social, economic and ecological challenges, Burch makes a notable shift towards positive social transformation, opting to share the rewards and potentials of simple living with others rather than additional criticism and analysis of contemporary problems. … The sourcebook is therefore an important and valuable resource for all educators or individuals interested in exploring simplicity further,.. Natalie Swayze, Research Associate, Centre for Indigenous Science Education, The University of Winnipeg In The Simplicity Exercises, Burch provides us with a path through that mental barrier [to transformative change] with comprehensive and well-thought-out group thought- experiments and exercises. Drawing from years of real-world experience, the book provides us a path beyond fear, critique and common despair-ridden questions about how to move forward to solve the challenges of our time.