Eight Unique Basal Bodies in the Multi-Flagellated Diplomonad

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Eight Unique Basal Bodies in the Multi-Flagellated Diplomonad McInally and Dawson Cilia (2016) 5:21 DOI 10.1186/s13630-016-0042-4 Cilia REVIEW Open Access Eight unique basal bodies in the multi‑flagellated diplomonad Giardia lamblia Shane G. McInally and Scott C. Dawson* Abstract Giardia lamblia is an intestinal parasitic protist that causes significant acute and chronic diarrheal disease worldwide. Giardia belongs to the diplomonads, a group of protists in the supergroup Excavata. Diplomonads are characterized by eight motile flagella organized into four bilaterally symmetric pairs. Each of the eight Giardia axonemes has a long cytoplasmic region that extends from the centrally located basal body before exiting the cell body as a membrane- bound flagellum. Each basal body is thus unique in its cytological position and its association with different cytoskel- etal features, including the ventral disc, axonemes, and extra-axonemal structures. Inheritance of these unique and complex cytoskeletal elements is maintained through basal body migration, duplication, maturation, and their subse- quent association with specific spindle poles during cell division. Due to the complex composition and inheritance of specific basal bodies and their associated structures, Giardia may require novel basal body-associated proteins. Thus, protists such as Giardia may represent an undiscovered source of novel basal body-associated proteins. The develop- ment of new tools that make Giardia genetically tractable will enable the composition, structure, and function of the eight basal bodies to be more thoroughly explored. Keywords: Giardia lamblia, Basal body, Axonemes, Flagella Background comparisons of the cytoskeletal biology of Giardia to Giardia lamblia is a single-celled protistan parasite that other diverse flagellated protists [5]. causes acute and chronic diarrheal disease, primarily in A recent classification scheme categorized all known developing countries with inadequate sanitation and eukaryotes into six primary lineages or supergroups: water treatment [1, 2]. The life cycle of Giardia includes Opisthokonts (e.g., animals, fungi), Amoebozoa, Archae- two stages: the proliferative pathogenic trophozoite and plastida (e.g., plants and green algae), Rhizaria, Chromal- the dormant infective cyst. Giardia belongs to the diplo- veolata, and the Excavata [6, 7]. Excavate protists have monads, a group of protists in the supergroup Exca- been proposed to be a basal lineage of eukaryotes, clos- vata whose defining cytological characteristics include est to the common ancestor of all extant eukaryotes [8, eight motile flagella and two nuclei [3]. The discovery 9]. Yet, the evolutionary diversity within the Excavata of Giardia is attributed to Antonie van Leewenhoek, represents genetic distances greater than those between [4] who in 1681 observed teardrop-shaped flagellates plants, animals, and fungi [6]. Molecular phylogenetic in his own stool. More than 300 years later, our under- support for the monophyly of this group is controversial standing of Giardia cytoskeletal biology remains rudi- [10]. All known excavates have flagellated life cycle stages mentary. This deficit is primarily due to a lack of tools and, as a group, excavates are defined by the presence for genetic manipulation; however, improved cytologi- of posteriorly directed flagella and flagellar root struc- cal descriptions and increasing numbers of genomes of tures associated with the basal bodies [11]. However, Giardia species and other related diplomonads are aiding excavate biology is quite varied, and diversity within this group encompasses free-living, commensal, and parasitic forms of the following types of protists: Fornicata (diplo- *Correspondence: [email protected] monads, oxymonads, and retortamonads), Parabasalia, Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, University of California Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, USA © 2016 McInally and Dawson. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons. org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. McInally and Dawson Cilia (2016) 5:21 Page 2 of 10 Euglenozoa (both euglenids and kinetoplastids), Heter- transition zones are restricted to small regions proxi- olobosea, Jakobida, and Preaxostyla. mal to the basal bodies rather than to the entire cyto- The swimming form of Giardia, or the “trophozoite,” plasmic axoneme [17]. The anterior basal bodies are has eight flagella that retain the canonical “9 + 2” struc- located toward the anterior ends of the two nuclei and ture of a motile flagellum [12]. Each flagellum also has oriented toward the anterior end of the cell. Basal bod- radial spokes, dynein arms, and outer doublet and central ies that nucleate the ventral, caudal, and posteriolateral pair microtubules [13, 14]. The eight flagella are organ- axonemes are positioned posteriorly below the two ante- ized into four bilaterally symmetrical pairs: the anterior, rior basal bodies and are oriented toward the posterior the caudal, the posteriolateral, and the ventral (Fig. 1). of the cell. Interphase trophozoites lack both barren and The basal bodies for all flagella are located in the anterior probasal bodies [18]. of the cell between the two nuclei. Each flagellar pair dif- Flagellar and basal body proteomics in Giardia have fers in its cytological position within the trophozoite and contributed to our overall understanding of flagellar in its association with ancillary structures. The coordi- structure and evolution; however, the selective isolation nated beating of Giardia’s eight motile flagella results in of axonemes or basal bodies from the extensive cytoskel- complex movements essential for motility and cell divi- eton in Giardia has proved to be challenging [19]. sion, and may aid in parasite attachment to the host gut Canonical basal body-associated proteins (e.g., centrin, epithelium [15, 16]; however, not all flagellar pairs have delta-tubulin and epsilon tubulin) and some compo- characteristic flagellar waveforms [15]. nents of the BBSome are present in the Giardia genome In general, eukaryotic flagella extend from a basal body (Table 1). Centrin localizes to two distinct clusters or centriole and are surrounded by a specialized flagel- adjacent to the two nuclei during interphase, colocaliz- lar membrane after they project from the cell surface. In ing with the flagellar basal bodies [20]. Consistent with contrast to other flagellated protists, each of the eight observations in other flagellated cells, gamma-tubulin Giardia axonemes has a long cytoplasmic region that also localizes to flagellar basal bodies during interphase; extends from a centrally located basal body before exiting however, gamma-tubulin localization is restricted only the cell body as a membrane-bound flagellum (Fig. 1 and to flagella that are newly produced during cell division see [16]). The ratio of the length of the cytoplasmic region [18]. to the membrane-bound portion varies between each fla- Notably, more than 1000 hypothetical proteins (e.g., gellar pair (e.g., over two-thirds of the length of the cau- those lacking significant similarity to proteins in other dal axonemes is in the cytoplasmic region, whereas only organisms) have been identified from the Giardia a third of the anterior axoneme is cytoplasmic). The ante- genome, and this genetic novelty is reflected in the analy- rior axonemes cross over the ventral disc spiral before ses of basal body [19] and cytoskeletal proteomes [21]. exiting on the right and left sides of the anterior region Proteins localizing to basal bodies may be structural com- of the cell. The distance from the exit point from the cell ponents or may merely dock at basal bodies before they body to the flagellar tip is about 12 µm. Running longi- are transported to other parts of the cell. Many known tudinally along the anterior-posterior axis of the cell, the basal body proteins are confirmed in the Giardia genome two caudal axonemes exit the cell body and extend about by homology or from localization studies (see centrin 7 µm at the posterior end. The ventral axonemes exit (GL50803_6744) and caltractin (GL50803_104685) in and extend about 14 µm on the ventral side in the “lat- Table 1 and imaged in Fig. 2). Other proteins identi- eral shield” region posterior to the disc. The posteriolat- fied as basal body proteins by comparative proteom- eral axonemes angle outward at the lower third of the cell ics lack basal body localization in Giardia (e.g., FAP52 body, extending about 8 µm from the cell body. Electron- (GL50803_15956) and PACRG1 (GL50803_15455), see dense “ciliary pockets” are found at the regions where Table 1), or localize to other cytoskeletal structures in each flagellum exits the cell body [17]. This review pre- addition to the basal bodies (e.g., GL50803_8557 and sents detailed findings concerning the structure, dupli- GL50803_29796, see Table 1, and imaged in Fig. 2). Fur- cation, and migration of the eight unique Giardia basal thermore, Giardia has proteins that localize to some or bodies during the parasite life cycle. all basal bodies, but lack homology to
Recommended publications
  • Introgression and Hybridization in Animal Parasites
    Genes 2010, 1, 102-123; doi:10.3390/genes1010102 OPEN ACCESS genes ISSN 2073-4425 www.mdpi.com/journal/genes Review An Infectious Topic in Reticulate Evolution: Introgression and Hybridization in Animal Parasites Jillian T. Detwiler * and Charles D. Criscione Department of Biology, Texas A&M University, 3258 TAMU, College Station, TX 77843, USA; E-Mail: [email protected] * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-979-845-0925; Fax: +1-979-845-2891. Received: 29 April 2010; in revised form: 7 June 2010 / Accepted: 7 June 2010 / Published: 9 June 2010 Abstract: Little attention has been given to the role that introgression and hybridization have played in the evolution of parasites. Most studies are host-centric and ask if the hybrid of a free-living species is more or less susceptible to parasite infection. Here we focus on what is known about how introgression and hybridization have influenced the evolution of protozoan and helminth parasites of animals. There are reports of genome or gene introgression from distantly related taxa into apicomplexans and filarial nematodes. Most common are genetic based reports of potential hybridization among congeneric taxa, but in several cases, more work is needed to definitively conclude current hybridization. In the medically important Trypanosoma it is clear that some clonal lineages are the product of past hybridization events. Similarly, strong evidence exists for current hybridization in human helminths such as Schistosoma and Ascaris. There remain topics that warrant further examination such as the potential hybrid origin of polyploid platyhelminths.
    [Show full text]
  • Pronunciation Guide to Microorganisms
    Pronunciation Guide to Microorganisms This pronunciation guide is provided to aid each student in acquiring a greater ease in discussing, describing, and using specific microorganisms. Please note that genus and species names are italicized. If they cannot be italicized, then they should be underlined (example: a lab notebook). Prokaryotic Species Correct Pronunciation Acetobacter aceti a-se-toh-BAK-ter a-SET-i Acetobacter pasteurianus a-se-toh-BAK-ter PAS-ter-iann-us Acintobacter calcoacetius a-sin-ee-toe-BAK-ter kal-koh-a-SEE-tee-kus Aerococcus viridans (air-o)-KOK-kus vi-ree-DANS Agrobacterium tumefaciens ag-roh-bak-TEAR-ium too-me-FAY-she-ens Alcaligenes denitrificans al-KAHL-li-jen-eez dee-ni-TREE-fee-cans Alcaligenes faecalis al-KAHL-li-jen-eez fee-KAL-is Anabaena an-na-BEE-na Azotobacter vinelandii a-zoe-toe-BAK-ter vin-lan-DEE-i Bacillus anthracis bah-SIL-lus AN-thray-sis Bacillus lactosporus bah-SIL-lus LAK-toe-spore-us Bacillus megaterium bah-SIL-lus Meg-a-TEER-ee-um Bacillus subtilis bah-SIL-lus SA-til-us Borrelia recurrentis bore-RELL-ee-a re-kur-EN-tis Branhamella catarrhalis bran-hem-EL-ah cat-arr-RAH-lis Citrobacter freundii sit-roe-BACK-ter FROND-ee-i Clostridium perfringens klos-TREH-dee-um per-FRINGE-enz Clostridium sporogenes klos-TREH-dee-um spore-AH-gen-ease Clostridium tetani klos-TREH-dee-um TET-ann-ee Corynebacterium diphtheriae koh-RYNE-nee-back-teer-ee-um dif-THEE-ry-ee Corynebacterium hofmanni koh-RYNE-nee-back-teer-ee-um hoff-MAN-eye Corynebacterium xerosis koh-RYNE-nee-back-teer-ee-um zer-OH-sis Enterobacter
    [Show full text]
  • Giardiasis Importance Giardiasis, a Gastrointestinal Disease Characterized by Acute Or Chronic Diarrhea, Is Caused by Protozoan Parasites in the Genus Giardia
    Giardiasis Importance Giardiasis, a gastrointestinal disease characterized by acute or chronic diarrhea, is caused by protozoan parasites in the genus Giardia. Giardia duodenalis is the major Giardia Enteritis, species found in mammals, and the only species known to cause illness in humans. This Lambliasis, organism is carried in the intestinal tract of many animals and people, with clinical signs Beaver Fever developing in some individuals, but many others remaining asymptomatic. In addition to diarrhea, the presence of G. duodenalis can result in malabsorption; some studies have implicated this organism in decreased growth in some infected children and Last Updated: December 2012 possibly decreased productivity in young livestock. Outbreaks are occasionally reported in people, as the result of mass exposure to contaminated water or food, or direct contact with infected individuals (e.g., in child care centers). People are considered to be the most important reservoir hosts for human giardiasis. The predominant genetic types of G. duodenalis usually differ in humans and domesticated animals (livestock and pets), and zoonotic transmission is currently thought to be of minor significance in causing human illness. Nevertheless, there is evidence that certain isolates may sometimes be shared, and some genetic types of G. duodenalis (assemblages A and B) should be considered potentially zoonotic. Etiology The protozoan genus Giardia (Family Giardiidae, order Giardiida) contains at least six species that infect animals and/or humans. In most mammals, giardiasis is caused by Giardia duodenalis, which is also called G. intestinalis. Both names are in current use, although the validity of the name G. intestinalis depends on the interpretation of the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature.
    [Show full text]
  • Multigene Eukaryote Phylogeny Reveals the Likely Protozoan Ancestors of Opis- Thokonts (Animals, Fungi, Choanozoans) and Amoebozoa
    Accepted Manuscript Multigene eukaryote phylogeny reveals the likely protozoan ancestors of opis- thokonts (animals, fungi, choanozoans) and Amoebozoa Thomas Cavalier-Smith, Ema E. Chao, Elizabeth A. Snell, Cédric Berney, Anna Maria Fiore-Donno, Rhodri Lewis PII: S1055-7903(14)00279-6 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2014.08.012 Reference: YMPEV 4996 To appear in: Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution Received Date: 24 January 2014 Revised Date: 2 August 2014 Accepted Date: 11 August 2014 Please cite this article as: Cavalier-Smith, T., Chao, E.E., Snell, E.A., Berney, C., Fiore-Donno, A.M., Lewis, R., Multigene eukaryote phylogeny reveals the likely protozoan ancestors of opisthokonts (animals, fungi, choanozoans) and Amoebozoa, Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution (2014), doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ j.ympev.2014.08.012 This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. 1 1 Multigene eukaryote phylogeny reveals the likely protozoan ancestors of opisthokonts 2 (animals, fungi, choanozoans) and Amoebozoa 3 4 Thomas Cavalier-Smith1, Ema E. Chao1, Elizabeth A. Snell1, Cédric Berney1,2, Anna Maria 5 Fiore-Donno1,3, and Rhodri Lewis1 6 7 1Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PS, UK.
    [Show full text]
  • Cas9-Mediated Genome Editing in Giardia Intestinalis
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.04.21.440745; this version posted April 21, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Cas9-mediated genome editing in Giardia intestinalis Vendula Horáčková1*, Luboš Voleman1*, Markéta Petrů1, Martina Vinopalová1, Filip Weisz2, Natalia Janowicz1, Lenka Marková1, Alžběta Motyčková1, Pavla Tůmová2, Pavel Doležal1 1Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, BIOCEV, Průmyslová 595, Vestec 252 50, Czech Republic 2Institute of Immunology and Microbiology, First Faculty of Medicine and General University Hospital, Charles University in Prague, Czech Republic Abstract CRISPR/Cas9 system is an extremely powerful technique that is extensively used for different genome modifications in various organisms including parasitic protists. Giardia intestinalis, a protozoan parasite infecting large number of people around the world each year, has been eluding the use of CRISPR/Cas9 technique so far which may be caused by its rather complicated genome containing four copies of each gene in its two nuclei. Apart from only single exception (Ebneter et al., 2016), without the use of CRISPR/Cas9 technology in its full potential, researchers in the field have not been able to establish knock-out cell lines to study the functional aspect of Giardia genes. In this work, we show the ability of in-vitro developed CRISPR/Cas9 components to successfully edit the genome of G. intestinalis. Moreover, we used ‘self-propagating’ CRISPR/Cas9 system to establish full knock-out cell lines for mem, cwp1 and mlf1 genes. We also show that the system function even for essential genes, as we knocked-down tom40, lowering the amount of Tom40 protein by more than 90%.
    [Show full text]
  • The Intestinal Protozoa
    The Intestinal Protozoa A. Introduction 1. The Phylum Protozoa is classified into four major subdivisions according to the methods of locomotion and reproduction. a. The amoebae (Superclass Sarcodina, Class Rhizopodea move by means of pseudopodia and reproduce exclusively by asexual binary division. b. The flagellates (Superclass Mastigophora, Class Zoomasitgophorea) typically move by long, whiplike flagella and reproduce by binary fission. c. The ciliates (Subphylum Ciliophora, Class Ciliata) are propelled by rows of cilia that beat with a synchronized wavelike motion. d. The sporozoans (Subphylum Sporozoa) lack specialized organelles of motility but have a unique type of life cycle, alternating between sexual and asexual reproductive cycles (alternation of generations). e. Number of species - there are about 45,000 protozoan species; around 8000 are parasitic, and around 25 species are important to humans. 2. Diagnosis - must learn to differentiate between the harmless and the medically important. This is most often based upon the morphology of respective organisms. 3. Transmission - mostly person-to-person, via fecal-oral route; fecally contaminated food or water important (organisms remain viable for around 30 days in cool moist environment with few bacteria; other means of transmission include sexual, insects, animals (zoonoses). B. Structures 1. trophozoite - the motile vegetative stage; multiplies via binary fission; colonizes host. 2. cyst - the inactive, non-motile, infective stage; survives the environment due to the presence of a cyst wall. 3. nuclear structure - important in the identification of organisms and species differentiation. 4. diagnostic features a. size - helpful in identifying organisms; must have calibrated objectives on the microscope in order to measure accurately.
    [Show full text]
  • Intestinal Parasitic Infection Effect on Some Blood Components
    Research ISSN 2413-0516 Intestinal parasitic infection effect on some blood components Hanaa Daaj Khalaf Al-Mozan,a Yahya Tomaa Daoud,b Khalid Majeed Dakhilc aBiology Department, Science College, Thi-Qar University, Iraq. bBiology Department, Science for Women College, Baghdad University, Iraq. cTechnical Institute in Nassiriyah, Iraq. Correspondence to Hanaa Daaj Khalaf Al-Mozan (email: hanaa_daaj @yahoo.com). (Submitted: 14 December 2016 – Revised version received: 27 December 2016 – Accepted: 10 January 2017 – Published online: 26 March 2017) Objectives To know the effect of intestinal parasitic infection on the differential count of white blood cells and sex factor effect on some blood criteria. Methods The fecal samples were examined by direct and indirect methods. Blood samples were withdrawn for the testing of the differential count of white blood cells, Hb, PCV, T.WBC and numbers of eosinophils. Results The results showed that AL-Jibaish General Hospital was the highest with parasitic infection (50.4%) in comparison with other hospitals. A high percentage (30%) of Entamoeba histolytica was formed. When compared with the percentage of each parasite under study between those hospitals, Entamoeba histolytica appeared with 12% in AL-Shatra and 46.6% in AL-Jibaish. There were significant differences between the parasite types in the percent of lymphocytes, neutrophils, monocytes and eosinophils. It ranged from increase and decrease according to parasite type. The significant difference appeared at the six-factor effect on the number of eosinophils was calculated by using the statistical analysis (χ2) in level P < 0.05. Conclusion E. histolytica is the most common parasite. AL-Jibaish district suffers from a lack of services.
    [Show full text]
  • Superorganisms of the Protist Kingdom: a New Level of Biological Organization
    Foundations of Science https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-020-09688-8 Superorganisms of the Protist Kingdom: A New Level of Biological Organization Łukasz Lamża1 © The Author(s) 2020 Abstract The concept of superorganism has a mixed reputation in biology—for some it is a conveni- ent way of discussing supra-organismal levels of organization, and for others, little more than a poetic metaphor. Here, I show that a considerable step forward in the understand- ing of superorganisms results from a thorough review of the supra-organismal levels of organization now known to exist among the “unicellular” protists. Limiting the discussion to protists has enormous advantages: their bodies are very well studied and relatively sim- ple (as compared to humans or termites, two standard examples in most discussions about superorganisms), and they exhibit an enormous diversity of anatomies and lifestyles. This allows for unprecedented resolution in describing forms of supra-organismal organiza- tion. Here, four criteria are used to diferentiate loose, incidental associations of hosts with their microbiota from “actual” superorganisms: (1) obligatory character, (2) specifc spatial localization of microbiota, (3) presence of attachment structures and (4) signs of co-evolu- tion in phylogenetic analyses. Three groups—that have never before been described in the philosophical literature—merit special attention: Symbiontida (also called Postgaardea), Oxymonadida and Parabasalia. Specifcally, it is argued that in certain cases—for Bihos- pites bacati and Calkinsia aureus (symbiontids), Streblomastix strix (an oxymonad), Joe- nia annectens and Mixotricha paradoxa (parabasalids) and Kentrophoros (a ciliate)—it is fully appropriate to describe the whole protist-microbiota assocation as a single organism (“superorganism”) and its elements as “tissues” or, arguably, even “organs”.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cytoskeleton of Giardia Lamblia
    International Journal for Parasitology 33 (2003) 3–28 www.parasitology-online.com Invited review The cytoskeleton of Giardia lamblia Heidi G. Elmendorfa,*, Scott C. Dawsonb, J. Michael McCafferyc aDepartment of Biology, Georgetown University, 348 Reiss Building 37th and O Sts. NW, Washington, DC 20057, USA bDepartment of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California Berkeley, 345 LSA Building, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA cDepartment of Biology, Johns Hopkins University, Integrated Imaging Center, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA Received 18 July 2002; received in revised form 18 September 2002; accepted 19 September 2002 Abstract Giardia lamblia is a ubiquitous intestinal pathogen of mammals. Evolutionary studies have also defined it as a member of one of the earliest diverging eukaryotic lineages that we are able to cultivate and study in the laboratory. Despite early recognition of its striking structure resembling a half pear endowed with eight flagella and a unique ventral disk, a molecular understanding of the cytoskeleton of Giardia has been slow to emerge. Perhaps most importantly, although the association of Giardia with diarrhoeal disease has been known for several hundred years, little is known of the mechanism by which Giardia exacts such a toll on its host. What is clear, however, is that the flagella and disk are essential for parasite motility and attachment to host intestinal epithelial cells. Because peristaltic flow expels intestinal contents, attachment is necessary for parasites to remain in the small intestine and cause diarrhoea, underscoring the essential role of the cytoskeleton in virulence. This review presents current day knowledge of the cytoskeleton, focusing on its role in motility and attachment.
    [Show full text]
  • New Perspectives on Analysing Data from Biological Collections Based on Social Network Analytics Pedro C
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN New perspectives on analysing data from biological collections based on social network analytics Pedro C. de Siracusa, Luiz M. R. Gadelha Jr. & Artur Ziviani Biological collections have been historically regarded as fundamental sources of scientifc information on biodiversity. They are commonly associated with a variety of biases, which must be characterized and mitigated before data can be consumed. In this work, we are motivated by taxonomic and collector biases, which can be understood as the efect of particular recording preferences of key collectors on shaping the overall taxonomic composition of biological collections they contribute to. In this context, we propose two network models as the frst steps towards a network-based conceptual framework for understanding the formation of biological collections as a result of the composition of collectors’ interests and activities. Building upon the defned network models, we present a case study in which we use our models to explore the community of collectors and the taxonomic composition of the University of Brasília herbarium. We describe topological features of the networks and point out some of the most relevant collectors in the biological collection as well as their taxonomic groups of interest. We also investigate their collaborative behaviour while recording specimens. Finally, we discuss future perspectives for incorporating temporal and geographical dimensions to the models. Moreover, we indicate some possible investigation directions that could beneft from our approach based on social network analytics to model and analyse biological collections. How data is classifed in information infrastructures directly impacts our potential knowledge about diferent domains1–3.
    [Show full text]
  • Identification of the Meiotic Life Cycle Stage of Trypanosoma Brucei in The
    Identification of the meiotic life cycle stage of Trypanosoma brucei in the tsetse fly Lori Peacocka,b, Vanessa Ferrisa,b, Reuben Sharmac,1, Jack Sunterc, Mick Baileyb, Mark Carringtonc, and Wendy Gibsona,2 aSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1UG, United Kingdom; bDepartment of Clinical Veterinary Science, University of Bristol, Bristol BS40 7DU, United Kingdom; and cDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1QW, United Kingdom Edited by Francisco J. Ayala, University of California, Irvine, CA, and approved January 27, 2011 (received for review December 23, 2010) Elucidating the mechanism of genetic exchange is fundamental for genetic exchange in T. brucei involves mixing of mitochondrial understanding how genes for such traits as virulence, disease (kinetoplast) and nuclear genomes, because hybrid progeny have phenotype, and drug resistance are transferred between pathogen hybrid kinetoplast DNA (kDNA) networks with mini-circles de- strains. Genetic exchange occurs in the parasitic protists Trypano- rived from both parents (14, 15). Plausible models for the gen- soma brucei, T. cruzi, and Leishmania major, but the precise cellular eration of hybrid kDNA networks are limited by the complex mechanisms are unknown, because the process has not been ob- structure and highly ordered replication of this concatenated served directly. Here we exploit the identification of homologs of mass of small DNA circles (16). Finally, trypanosomes belong to meiotic genes in the T. brucei genome and demonstrate that three the Euglenozoa, a deep branch within the excavate eukaryote su- functionally distinct, meiosis-specific proteins are expressed in the pergroup (17, 18). The production of four haploid gametes and nucleus of a single specific cell type, defining a previously unde- subsequent fusion to reform the diploid occurring in trypanosomes scribed developmental stage occurring within the tsetse flysalivary would strongly suggest the presence of a typical meiosis in the last gland.
    [Show full text]
  • Elizabeth J. Walsh Professor - Biological Sciences University of Texas at El Paso December 10, 2019
    Elizabeth J. Walsh Professor - Biological Sciences University of Texas at El Paso December 10, 2019 1. Education B.S., Animal Biology, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, December 1983. Ph.D., Environmental Biology, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Las Vegas, Nevada, May, 1992. Mentor: Dr. Peter L. Starkweather Dissertation title: Ecological and genetic aspects of the population biology of the littoral rotifer Euchlanis dilatata 2. Professional Employment - UTEP September 2014 to Director Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Program Present June 2013 to Interim Department Chair September 2014 September 2008 to Professor of Biological Sciences Present University of Texas at El Paso September 2000 to Associate Professor of Biological Sciences August 2008 University of Texas at El Paso September 1994 to Assistant Professor of Biological Sciences 2000 University of Texas at El Paso 3. Professional Employment – Prior to UTEP July 1993 to Postdoctoral Research Associate, September 1994 Department of Zoology, Brigham Young University September 1992- Lecturer, Rutgers University, December 1992 Population Ecology (Graduate level) December 1991- Gallagher Postdoctoral Fellow, June 1993 Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 4. Professional Societies American Microscopical Society, Executive Committee Member at Large of Board (2012-2014) Association for the Sciences of Limnology and Oceanography Ecological Society of America Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, Scientific Program Committee (2011-2012) Southwest Association of Naturalist Sigma Xi 5. Awards 1. UTEP Academy of Distinguished Teachers (April 2019) 1. University Faculty Marshals of Students (May 2019, December 2019) 2. Graduate School Faculty Marshal of Students (May 2017) 3. University of Texas Regents’ Outstanding Teaching Award (2015). UTEP nominee, (2014); College of Science (2012, 2013, 2014); Department of Biological Science (2012, 2013, 2014) 4.
    [Show full text]