DOCSLIB.ORG

Kimberly-Clark Worldwide Site Upland Area, Everett,Snohomish County,Washington 

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Kimberly-Clark Worldwide Site Upland Area, Everett,Snohomish County,Washington  ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT FOR THE KIMBERLY-CLARK WORLDWIDE SITE UPLAND AREA, EVERETT,SNOHOMISH COUNTY,WASHINGTON REDACTED FOR GENERAL DISTRIBUTION March 25, 2013 Report Number 24976 SWCA/NORTHWEST ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSOCIATES SEATTLE,WASHINGTON ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT FOR THE KIMBERLY-CLARK WORLDWIDE SITE UPLAND AREA, EVERETT,SNOHOMISH COUNTY,WASHINGTON Report Prepared for Steve Germiat Aspect Consulting LLC 401 Second Avenue S., Suite 201 Seattle, WA 98104 By Brandy Rinck, Sharon Boswell, and Johonna Shea March 25, 2013 Report Number 24976 REDACTED FOR GENERAL DISTRIBUTION SWCA/Northwest Archaeological Associates 5418 - 20th Avenue NW, Suite 200 Seattle, Washington 98107 ABSTRACT TheKimberlyͲClarkWorldwide(KͲCWW)uplandareawasdevelopedforhistoricalpulpandpaper manufacturingandtheareaiscontaminatedasaresultoftheindustrialoperations.Theexistingpulp andpapermillwillbedemolishedtopreparetheuplandareaforcleanupandeventuallandusechange. TheDepartmentofEcologyandKͲCWW,Inc.haveexecutedanAgreedOrdertocompletestudies relatedtofuturecleanupaswellasopportunisticinterimactioncleanupactivitiesduringdemolitionof themill.AsrequiredbytheInterimActionPlan,whichisExhibitCtotheAgreedOrder,SWCA EnvironmentalConsultantshasassessedtheprobabilityforencounteringarchaeologicaldepositsor objectsduringcleanupofthecontaminatedKͲCWWuplandarea,concentratingon11areascalledout inopportunisticcleanupplans.Thisassessmentincludesbackgroundinformationonthesettingofthe projectarea,expectationsforburiedculturalresourcesbasedonpreviousinvestigationsinthevicinity, andaGISͲbasedprobabilitymapshowingareaswithlow,medium,andhighpotentialtoharbor significantarchaeologicalmaterialsintheentireKͲCWWUplandprojectarea.Areaswithhigh probabilityforburiedculturalresourceswillbeaddressedduringfutureprojectconstructionanda monitoringanddiscoveryplanwillbedevelopedforuseduringopportunisticcleanup. SWCA/Northwest Archaeological Associates i March 25, 2013 SWCA/Northwest Archaeological Associates ii March 25, 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT .................................................................................................................................... I LIST OF FIGURES ...................................................................................................................... V LIST OF TABLES ......................................................................................................................... V INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 1 ProjectLocationandDescription..............................................................................................................1 RegulatoryContext...................................................................................................................................1 TribalCoordination...................................................................................................................................5 SETTING ...................................................................................................................................... 5 NaturalSetting..........................................................................................................................................6 Geology.................................................................................................................................................6 Geomorphology....................................................................................................................................8 TheSnohomishRiverDelta...................................................................................................................9 FloraandFauna.....................................................................................................................................9 CulturalSetting.......................................................................................................................................10 Prehistory............................................................................................................................................10 Ethnography........................................................................................................................................11 History.................................................................................................................................................12 PREVIOUS INVESTIGATIONS .................................................................................................. 36 EXPECTATIONS ........................................................................................................................ 38 METHODS .................................................................................................................................. 41 GEOARCHAEOLOGICAL ANALYSIS ........................................................................................ 42 Fill............................................................................................................................................................42 HoloceneͲageDeposits...........................................................................................................................50 SENSITIVITY MODELING .......................................................................................................... 51 Landforms...............................................................................................................................................51 SnohomishRiverDelta........................................................................................................................52 Marsh..................................................................................................................................................52 Foreshore............................................................................................................................................52 Beach...................................................................................................................................................53 Backshore............................................................................................................................................53 Upland.................................................................................................................................................53 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................................. 58 SWCA/Northwest Archaeological Associates iii March 25, 2013 REFERENCES ........................................................................................................................... 61 APPENDIX A: CORRESPONDENCE ....................................................................................... A-1 APPENDIX B: CORE LOG SUMMARY .................................................................................... B-1 APPENDIX C: SANBORN MAPS ............................................................................................. C-1 Cover:OverviewofPortGardnerwaterfront,lookingnorthfromapproximatelyHewittAve,showingthe projectarea.PhotographbyR.KingandD.W.Baskerville,takenMarch1,1892.EverettPublic Library,KingandBaskervilleCollection,Image0065. SWCA/Northwest Archaeological Associates iv March 25, 2013 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. Project location. ........................................................................................................................... 2 Figure 2. K-C WW upland project area showing the uplands, tidelands, and mill structures demolished during interim action cleanup efforts. .......................................................................................... 3 Figure 3. Proposed opportunistic cleanup locations in the K-C WW upland area. .................................... 4 Figure 4. Historical H-sheet showing the mean historic shoreline and low water line; note the telegraph office and small structures shown just south of the project area in 1886. ................ 13 Figure 5. GLO plat map from 1869 showing Brigham’s cabin mapped in the southern part of the project area and the telegraph line running through the east edge of the project. ................... 14 Figure 6. Early development in the vicinity of Everett, 1897 and 1911. ................................................... 16 Figure 7. Birdseye view of the project area in 1893, showing the Parminter, Robinson Mill to the north and the Rucker Dock to the south. .................................................................................. 17 Figure 8. Overview of the project vicinity looking southwest from approximately 21st St and Grand Ave, 1892. ................................................................................................................................. 18 Figure 9. The Port Gardner waterfront in 1902. ....................................................................................... 20 Figure 10. Overview of Port Gardner showing the Clark-Nickerson Mill and the Everett Flour Mill, c. 1912. ...................................................................................................................................... 22 Figure 11. Overview of the Clark-Nickerson Mill, c. 1927. ......................................................................... 23 Figure 12. Advertisement showing the Everett Flour Mill, c. 1915. ...........................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 4312-50 Department of the Interior
    This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 10/25/2013 and available online at http://federalregister.gov/a/2013-25106, and on FDsys.gov 4312-50 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR National Park Service [NPS-WASO-NAGPRA-13947] [PPWOCRADN0-PCU00RP14.R50000] Notice of Inventory Completion: Thomas Burke Memorial Washington State Museum, University of Washington, Seattle, WA AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior. ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: The Thomas Burke Memorial Washington State Museum, University of Washington (Burke Museum), has completed an inventory of human remains, in consultation with the appropriate Indian tribes or Native Hawaiian organizations, and has determined that there is a cultural affiliation between the human remains and present-day Indian tribes or Native Hawaiian organizations. Lineal descendants or representatives of any Indian tribe or Native Hawaiian organization not identified in this notice that wish to request transfer of control of these human remains should submit a written request to the Burke Museum. If no additional requestors come forward, transfer of control of the human remains to the lineal descendants, Indian tribes, or Native Hawaiian organizations stated in this notice may proceed. DATES: Lineal descendants or representatives of any Indian tribe or Native Hawaiian organization not identified in this notice that wish to request transfer of control of these human remains should submit a written request with information in support of the request to the Burke Museum at the address in this notice by [INSERT DATE 30 DAYS AFTER DATE OF 1 PUBLICATION IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER]. ADDRESSES: Peter Lape, Burke Museum, University of Washington, Box 353010, Seattle, WA 98195, telephone (206) 685-3849, email [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Snohomish Estuary Wetland Integration Plan
    Snohomish Estuary Wetland Integration Plan April 1997 City of Everett Environmental Protection Agency Puget Sound Water Quality Authority Washington State Department of Ecology Snohomish Estuary Wetlands Integration Plan April 1997 Prepared by: City of Everett Department of Planning and Community Development Paul Roberts, Director Project Team City of Everett Department of Planning and Community Development Stephen Stanley, Project Manager Roland Behee, Geographic Information System Analyst Becky Herbig, Wildlife Biologist Dave Koenig, Manager, Long Range Planning and Community Development Bob Landles, Manager, Land Use Planning Jan Meston, Plan Production Washington State Department of Ecology Tom Hruby, Wetland Ecologist Rick Huey, Environmental Scientist Joanne Polayes-Wien, Environmental Scientist Gail Colburn, Environmental Scientist Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10 Duane Karna, Fisheries Biologist Linda Storm, Environmental Protection Specialist Funded by EPA Grant Agreement No. G9400112 Between the Washington State Department of Ecology and the City of Everett EPA Grant Agreement No. 05/94/PSEPA Between Department of Ecology and Puget Sound Water Quality Authority Cover Photo: South Spencer Island - Joanne Polayes Wien Acknowledgments The development of the Snohomish Estuary Wetland Integration Plan would not have been possible without an unusual level of support and cooperation between resource agencies and local governments. Due to the foresight of many individuals, this process became a partnership in which jurisdictional politics were set aside so that true land use planning based on the ecosystem rather than political boundaries could take place. We are grateful to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Department of Ecology (DOE) and Puget Sound Water Quality Authority for funding this planning effort, and to Linda Storm of the EPA and Lynn Beaton (formerly of DOE) for their guidance and encouragement during the grant application process and development of the Wetland Integration Plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Modeling Tsunami Inundation for Hazard Mapping at Everett, Washington, from the Seattle Fault
    NOAA Technical Memorandum OAR PMEL-147 doi:10.7289/V59Z92V0 MODELING TSUNAMI INUNDATION FOR HAZARD MAPPING AT EVERETT, WASHINGTON, FROM THE SEATTLE FAULT C. Chamberlin D. Arcas Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory Seattle, WA August 2015 NATIONAL OCEANIC AND Office of Oceanic and ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION Atmospheric Research NOAA Technical Memorandum OAR PMEL-147 doi:10.7289/V59Z92V0 MODELING TSUNAMI INUNDATION FOR HAZARD MAPPING AT EVERETT, WASHINGTON, FROM THE SEATTLE FAULT C. Chamberlin1 and D. Arcas2,3 1 The Climate Corporation, Seattle, WA 2 Joint Institute for the Study of Atmosphere and Ocean (JISAO), University of Washington, Seattle, WA 3 NOAA Center for Tsunami Research (NCTR) / Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory (PMEL), Seattle, WA Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory August 2015 UNITED STATES NATIONAL OCEANIC AND Office of Oceanic and DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION Atmospheric Research Penny Pritzker Kathryn Sullivan Craig McLean Secretary Under Secretary for Oceans Assistant Administrator and Atmosphere/Administrator NOTICE from NOAA Mention of a commercial company or product does not constitute an endorsement by NOAA/ OAR. Use of information from this publication concerning proprietary products or the tests of such products for publicity or advertising purposes is not authorized. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Contribution No. 3625 from NOAA/Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory Contribution No. 1833 from Joint Institute for the Study of the Atmosphere and Ocean (JISAO) Also available from the National Technical Information Service (NTIS) (http://w w w.ntis.gov) TSUNAMI HAZARD MAPPING AT EVERETT, WASHINGTON iii Contents List of Figures v List of Tables v 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 81, No. 180/Friday, September 16, 2016/Notices
    Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 180 / Friday, September 16, 2016 / Notices 63795 Summit Hill Drive, WT11D, Knoxville, Native Hawaiian organization not Camano Island is located in Puget TN 37902–1401, telephone (865) 632– identified in this notice that wish to Sound between Whidbey Island and 7458, email [email protected], by claim these cultural items should mainland Washington State; the Cama October 17, 2016. After that date, if no submit a written request with Beach Shell Midden site is on the additional requestors have come information in support of the claim to western shores of the island. Saratoga forward, transfer of control of the the State Parks at the address in this Passage is a waterway between the two human remains and associated funerary notice by October 17, 2016. islands. Along Saratoga Passage, the objects to the Alabama-Coushatta Tribe ADDRESSES: Alicia Woods, Washington shores of both islands are rich in of Texas, the Alabama-Quassarte Tribal State Parks and Recreation Commission, prehistoric Native American seasonal Town, the Coushatta Tribe of Louisiana, P.O. Box 42650, Olympia, WA 98504– resources sites. and the Muscogee (Creek) Nation may 2650, telephone (360) 902–0939, email Historical and anthropological proceed. [email protected]. sources indicate that the Kikiallus, TVA is responsible for notifying the Swinomish, Lower Skagit and SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Alabama-Coushatta Tribe of Texas Notice is Stillaguamish peoples occupied and had (previously listed as the Alabama- here given in accordance with the village sites in the Penn Cove area of Coushatta Tribes of Texas); Alabama- Native American Graves Protection and Whidbey Island and on the Quassarte Tribal Town; Cherokee Repatriation Act (NAGPRA), 25 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 13 -- Puget Sound, Washington
    514 Puget Sound, Washington Volume 7 WK50/2011 123° 122°30' 18428 SKAGIT BAY STRAIT OF JUAN DE FUCA S A R A T O 18423 G A D A M DUNGENESS BAY I P 18464 R A A L S T S Y A G Port Townsend I E N L E T 18443 SEQUIM BAY 18473 DISCOVERY BAY 48° 48° 18471 D Everett N U O S 18444 N O I S S E S S O P 18458 18446 Y 18477 A 18447 B B L O A B K A Seattle W E D W A S H I N ELLIOTT BAY G 18445 T O L Bremerton Port Orchard N A N 18450 A 18452 C 47° 47° 30' 18449 30' D O O E A H S 18476 T P 18474 A S S A G E T E L N 18453 I E S C COMMENCEMENT BAY A A C R R I N L E Shelton T Tacoma 18457 Puyallup BUDD INLET Olympia 47° 18456 47° General Index of Chart Coverage in Chapter 13 (see catalog for complete coverage) 123° 122°30' WK50/2011 Chapter 13 Puget Sound, Washington 515 Puget Sound, Washington (1) This chapter describes Puget Sound and its nu- (6) Other services offered by the Marine Exchange in- merous inlets, bays, and passages, and the waters of clude a daily newsletter about future marine traffic in Hood Canal, Lake Union, and Lake Washington. Also the Puget Sound area, communication services, and a discussed are the ports of Seattle, Tacoma, Everett, and variety of coordinative and statistical information.
    [Show full text]
  • Tulalip Tribes V. Suquamish Tribe
    FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT TULALIP TRIBES, No. 13-35773 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. Nos. v. 2:05-sp-00004- RSM SUQUAMISH INDIAN TRIBE, 2:70-cv-09213- Defendant-Appellee, RSM and OPINION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; SWINOMISH TRIBAL COMMUNITY; JAMESTOWN S’KLALLAM TRIBE; LOWER ELWHA BAND OF KLALLAMS; PORT GAMBLE S’KLALLAM TRIBE; NISQUALLY INDIAN TRIBE; SKOKOMISH INDIAN TRIBE; UPPER SKAGIT INDIAN TRIBE; LUMMI NATION; NOOKSACK INDIAN TRIBE OF WASHINGTON STATE; WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE; QUINAULT INDIAN NATION; STILLAGUAMISH TRIBE; PUYALLUP TRIBE; MUCKLESHOOT INDIAN TRIBE; QUILEUTE INDIAN TRIBE, Real-parties-in-interest. 2 TULALIP TRIBES V. SUQUAMISH INDIAN TRIBE Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Ricardo S. Martinez, District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted October 8, 2014—Seattle, Washington Filed July 27, 2015 Before: Richard A. Paez, Jay S. Bybee, and Consuelo M. Callahan, Circuit Judges. Opinion by Judge Paez SUMMARY* Indian Law The panel affirmed the district court’s summary judgment in a treaty fishing rights case in which the Tulalip Tribes sought a determination of the scope of the Suquamish Indian Tribe’s usual and accustomed fishing grounds and stations. The Tulalip Tribes invoked the district court’s continuing jurisdiction as provided by a permanent injunction entered in 1974. The panel affirmed the district court’s conclusion that certain contested areas were not excluded from the Suquamish Tribe’s usual and accustomed fishing grounds and stations, as determined by the district court in 1975. * This summary constitutes no part of the opinion of the court.
    [Show full text]
  • Market Evaluation
    Metro Everett Plan – Market Evaluation Date April 2016 To Paul Popelka, City of Everett From Leland Consulting Group Introduction The City of Everett’s Planning and Community Development Department engaged Leland Consulting Group (LCG) to conduct this market evaluation as part of the Everett Metro Center Plan and Brownfields Assessment efforts. The focus of LCG’s analysis, and this memorandum, has been to: Estimate a 10- and 20-year forecast of residential and commercial development; Identify metrics that suggest which properties and areas are likely to redevelop; Conduct a preliminary review of the zoning code within the Metro Center, and recommend zoning modifications that could encourage development; and, Provide “big ideas” that could assist with the ongoing success of the Metro Center. Economic Development Context This Metro Center planning effort takes place within the context of several national and international economic trends. The first is the exceptional ongoing strength of the Puget Sound economy; the second is the “downtown rebound” trend that has gained momentum in recent decades. Both are very beneficial to the Everett Metro Center. However, they do not guarantee success on all fronts, since the fortunes of the entire Puget Sound region do not necessarily translate directly to development in central Everett. One excellent source for national and regional perspective on current real estate trends is the Urban Land Institute’s (ULI) annual Emerging Trends in Real Estate report. The 2016 report ranks the Seattle region as number four for development and investment prospects among 75 metropolitan markets nationwide—above San Francisco, Los Angeles, and New York.
    [Show full text]
  • UCLA Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    UCLA UCLA Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Categorization in Motion: Duwamish Identity, 1792-1934 Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/75s2k9tm Author O'Malley, Corey Susan Publication Date 2017 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Categorization in Motion: Duwamish Identity, 1792-1934 A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Sociology by Corey Susan O’Malley 2017 © Copyright by Corey Susan O’Malley 2017 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION Categorization in Motion: Duwamish Identity, 1792-1934 by Corey Susan O’Malley Doctor of Philosophy in Sociology University of California, Los Angeles, 2017 Professor Rebecca J. Emigh, Chair This study uses narrative analysis to examine how racial, ethnic, and national schemas were mobilized by social actors to categorize Duwamish identity from the eighteenth century to the early twentieth century. In so doing, it evaluates how the classificatory schemas of non- indigenous actors, particularly the state, resembled or diverged from Duwamish self- understandings and the relationship between these classificatory schemes and the configuration of political power in the Puget Sound region of Washington state. The earliest classificatory schema applied to the Duwamish consisted of a racial category “Indian” attached to an ethno- national category of “tribe,” which was honed during the treaty period. After the “Indian wars” of 1855-56, this ethno-national orientation was supplanted by a highly racialized schema aimed at the political exclusion of “Indians”. By the twentieth century, however, formalized racialized exclusion was replaced by a racialized ethno-national schema by which tribal membership was defined using a racial logic of blood purity.
    [Show full text]
  • Scott Paper Co
    SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION FORM 10-K Annual report pursuant to section 13 and 15(d) Filing Date: 1994-03-23 | Period of Report: 1993-12-25 SEC Accession No. 0000950109-94-000524 (HTML Version on secdatabase.com) FILER SCOTT PAPER CO Business Address SCOTT PLZ CIK:87949| IRS No.: 231065080 | State of Incorp.:PA | Fiscal Year End: 1231 PHILADELPHIA PA 19113 Type: 10-K | Act: 34 | File No.: 001-02300 | Film No.: 94517373 2155225000 SIC: 2621 Paper mills Copyright © 2012 www.secdatabase.com. All Rights Reserved. Please Consider the Environment Before Printing This Document - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the Fiscal Year Ended December 25, Commission File Number 1-2300 1993 SCOTT PAPER COMPANY A Pennsylvania Corporation IRS Employer Identification No. 23- 1065080 Scott Plaza Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19113-1585 Telephone (610) 522-5000 SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(B) OF THE ACT: <TABLE> <CAPTION> NAME OF EACH EXCHANGE TITLE OF EACH CLASS ON WHICH REGISTERED - -------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- <S> <C> Cumulative Senior Preferred Shares (without par value) Series designated $3.40 Cumula- tive Senior Preferred Shares.. Philadelphia Stock Exchange Series designated $4.00 Cumula- tive Senior
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to the Cummings Structural Concrete Company Records
    Guide to the Cummings Structural Concrete Company Records NMAH.AC.0218 Erin Molloy 2011 Archives Center, National Museum of American History P.O. Box 37012 Suite 1100, MRC 601 Washington, D.C. 20013-7012 [email protected] http://americanhistory.si.edu/archives Table of Contents Collection Overview ........................................................................................................ 1 Administrative Information .............................................................................................. 1 Scope and Contents........................................................................................................ 2 Arrangement..................................................................................................................... 3 Biographical / Historical.................................................................................................... 1 Names and Subjects ...................................................................................................... 4 Container Listing ............................................................................................................. 5 Series 1: Biographical, 1904-1936 and undated...................................................... 5 Series 2: Operational Records, 1884-1952 and undated....................................... 11 Series 3: Subject Files, 1891-1970 and undated................................................... 28 Series 4: Publications, 1887-1953 and undated...................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Russian American Contacts, 1917-1937: a Review Article
    names of individual forts; names of M. Odivetz, and Paul J. Novgorotsev, Rydell, Robert W., All the World’s a Fair: individual ships 20(3):235-36 Visions of Empire at American “Russian American Contacts, 1917-1937: Russian Shadows on the British Northwest International Expositions, 1876-1916, A Review Article,” by Charles E. Coast of North America, 1810-1890: review, 77(2):74; In the People’s Interest: Timberlake, 61(4):217-21 A Study of Rejection of Defence A Centennial History of Montana State A Russian American Photographer in Tlingit Responsibilities, by Glynn Barratt, University, review, 85(2):70 Country: Vincent Soboleff in Alaska, by review, 75(4):186 Ryesky, Diana, “Blanche Payne, Scholar Sergei Kan, review, 105(1):43-44 “Russian Shipbuilding in the American and Teacher: Her Career in Costume Russian Expansion on the Pacific, 1641-1850, Colonies,” by Clarence L. Andrews, History,” 77(1):21-31 by F. A. Golder, review, 6(2):119-20 25(1):3-10 Ryker, Lois Valliant, With History Around Me: “A Russian Expedition to Japan in 1852,” by The Russian Withdrawal From California, by Spokane Nostalgia, review, 72(4):185 Paul E. Eckel, 34(2):159-67 Clarence John Du Four, 25(1):73 Rylatt, R. M., Surveying the Canadian Pacific: “Russian Exploration in Interior Alaska: An Russian-American convention (1824), Memoir of a Railroad Pioneer, review, Extract from the Journal of Andrei 11(2):83-88, 13(2):93-100 84(2):69 Glazunov,” by James W. VanStone, Russian-American Telegraph, Western Union Ryman, James H. T., rev. of Indian and 50(2):37-47 Extension, 72(3):137-40 White in the Northwest: A History of Russian Extension Telegraph.
    [Show full text]
  • Characterization of Pulps for Papermaking Characterization of Four Stockpile Pulps
    -i. 1 tL~~-c4 -- ?L A. ~ ~ ~ Z IE'I I I - c- _- II I _J L CHARACTERIZATION OF PULPS FOR PAPERMAKING CHARACTERIZATION OF FOUR STOCKPILE PULPS Project 2406 Report Seven A Progress Report to MEMBERS OF GROUP PROJECT 2406 March 8, 1967 r- 1 9 EPiiBXj 4 Cp I h--IILL I THE INSTITUTE OF PAPER CHEMISTRY Appleton, Wisconsin CHARACTERIZATION OF PULPS FOR PAPERMAKING CHARACTERIZATION OF FOUR STOCKPILE PULPS Project 2406 Report Seven A Progress Report to MEMBERS OF GROUP PROJECT 2406 March 8, 1967 MEMBERS OF GROUP PROJECT 2406 Albemarle Paper Company American Can Company Blandin Paper Company Brown Company The Chesapeake Corporation Consolidated Papers, Inc. Container Corporation of America Continental Can Company, Inc. Crossett Division, Georgia-Pacific Corporation Crown Zellerbach Corporation Eastman Kodak Company Fox River Paper Corporation Great Northern Paper Company Hammermill Paper Company Hoerner Waldorf Corporation International Paper Company Kimberly-Clark Corporation Knowlton Brothers The Mead Corporation Michigan Carton Company Mohawk Paper Mills, Inc. NVF Co. Nekoosa-Edwards Paper Company Oxford Paper Company Potlatch Forests, Inc. The Procter & Gamble Company Riegel Paper Corporation Riverside Paper Corporation Scott Paper Company Sonoco Products Company Tennessee River Pulp & Paper Company Thilmany Pulp & Paper Company Tileston & Hollingsworth Co. Union Camp Corporation Union Mills Paper Manufacturing Co. U.S. Plywood--Champion Papers Inc. S. D. Warren Company Wausau Paper Mills Company West Virginia Pulp and Paper Company Weyerhaeuser Company TABLE OF CONTENTS Page SUMMARY 1 INTRODUCTION 4 PULPS 8 PULP PREPARATION AND TESTING 10 THE GRAPHICAL PRESENTATION OF DATA 12 DRAINAGE PROPERTIES 27 FIBER DIMENSIONS 31 FIBER STRENGTH 38 BONDING 39 RELATIONSHIP OF MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF HANDSHEETS TO PULP CHARACTERISTICS 46 The Effect of Fiber Length 46 The Effect of Fiber Strength 51 The Effect of Bonding 51 Drainage Characteristics 56 Relationships Among Tests 61 FUTURE USE OF DATA 64 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 66 APPENDIX I.
    [Show full text]