DOCSLIB.ORG

Sensitive Ecosystems Inventory: Lake Country, 2005

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sensitive Ecosystems Inventory: Lake Country, 2005 Sensitive Ecosystems Inventory: Lake Country, 2005 Volume 2: Terrestrial Ecosystem, Terrain, Terrain Stability, and Surface Erosion Mapping, and Expanded Legend February 2006 Kristi Iverson, Iverson & MacKenzie Biological Consulting Ltd. Polly Uunila, Polar Geoscience ii Acknowledgements The project was funded by The Real Estate Foundation of BC1, the BC Ministry of Environment, and the District of Lake Country. Project management was provided by Kristi Iverson2 and Mike Reiley3. Field work was completed by Kristi Iverson, Polly Uunila4, Mike Sarell5 and Allison Haney5. Helen Davis6 completed landowner contact. Draft bioterrain mapping was completed by Robert Maxwell, and final bioterrain mapping, terrain stability and erosion potential mapping was completed by Polly Uunila, P.Geo. Ecosystem mapping was completed by Kristi Iverson, R.P.Bio. Bon Lee7 completed monorestitution and cartography work. This project has adapted material from the reports for the Bella Vista – Goose Lake Range Sensitive Ecosystems Inventory and Central Okanagan Sensitive Ecosystems Inventory. We would like to thank the many landowners that gave us permission to access their lands for field sampling. 1 The mission of the Real Estate Foundation is to support sustainable real estate and land use practices for the benefit of British Columbians. 2 Iverson & MacKenzie Biological Consulting Ltd. 3 District of Lake Country 4 Polar Geoscience 5 Ophiuchus Consulting 6 Artemis Wildlife Consultants 7 Baseline Geomatics Inc. iii Introduction This report presents detailed information on ecosystems in the Lake Country of the Central Okanagan. It is the second volume in a series of three volumes. Volume 2, this report, provides detailed information on terrestrial ecosystem mapping (TEM) methods and gives descriptions of each of the ecosystems that occur within the sensitive ecosystems or other important ecosystems categories described in Volume 1. Appendix B of Volume 1 provides tables that can be used to cross-reference between sensitive and other important ecosystems units and terrestrial ecosystem map units in this report. This report describes the natural setting of the study area and details methods, results and recommendations for bioterrain mapping and ecosystem mapping. It is intended for use by professionals that require more detailed ecological and terrain information. It is recommended for use by people interested in developing other interpretive map themes from the ecosystem or terrain mapping. Volume 18 is intended for people and organizations that need information to help conserve and protect remaining sensitive and important ecosystems in the District of Lake Country and other similar areas. It is also intended to provide information and advice to landowners and developers on how to minimize and avoid possible degradation of sensitive ecosystems due to land use and development activities. Volume 39 contains wildlife habitat mapping themes developed from the terrestrial ecosystem mapping (TEM) for the following ten species: Great Basin Spadefoot (Spea intermontana), Painted Turtle (Chrysemys picta), Western Rattlesnake (Crotalus oreganus), Gopher Snake (Pituophis catenifer ssp. deserticola), Western Screech-owl (Otus kennicottii ssp. macfarlanei), Long-billed Curlew (Numenius americanus), Yellow-breasted Chat (Icteria virens), Grasshopper Sparrow (Ammodramus savannarum), Swainson’s Hawk (Buteo swainsonii), Spotted Bat (Euderma maculatum) and Badger (Taxidea taxus jeffersonii). All of these species are considered at risk in the province of B.C. and most are listed under the federal Species at Risk Act. These species provide a cross-section of threatened or endangered amphibians, reptiles, birds, and mammals that depend on a range of different ecosystems in the study area. There are many other threatened and endangered species that likely occur in the study area and are listed in each ecosystem chapter of Volume 1. Wildlife habitat mapping portrays the potential importance of each ecosystem to specific animal species through a species-habitat model. The model assigns ratings to different ecosystem units from the TEM based on the needs of the species for particular life requisites. These ratings are displayed on the wildlife habitat maps. Volume 3 is intended for professionals who require more detailed information on wildlife habitat values in the study area than Volume 1 provides. 8 Iverson 2006 9 Haney and Sarell 2006 iv Table of Contents ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .......................................................................................................................III INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................................................... IV TABLE OF CONTENTS.............................................................................................................................V LIST OF FIGURES.................................................................................................................................... VI LIST OF TABLES...................................................................................................................................... VI 1 STUDY AREA..................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 LANDSCAPE SETTING ................................................................................................................... 2 Bedrock Geology................................................................................................................................... 2 Landscape Evolution............................................................................................................................. 4 Soils....................................................................................................................................................... 4 Climate.................................................................................................................................................. 5 Ecoregional and Biogeoclimatic Classification.................................................................................... 6 1.2 ECOLOGY AND DISTURBANCE PROCESSES ................................................................................... 7 1.3 HUMAN HISTORY ......................................................................................................................... 8 2 METHODS AND LIMITATIONS .................................................................................................... 9 2.1 TERRESTRIAL ECOSYSTEM MAPPING ........................................................................................... 9 Preliminary Terrain Mapping............................................................................................................... 9 Field Sampling.................................................................................................................................... 11 Final Terrain Mapping ....................................................................................................................... 12 Expanded Legend Development.......................................................................................................... 12 Site Series and Site Unit Mapping ...................................................................................................... 13 Data Management............................................................................................................................... 14 2.2 TERRAIN STABILITY ................................................................................................................... 15 Terrain stability Criteria..................................................................................................................... 16 2.3 EROSION POTENTIAL.................................................................................................................. 18 Erosion Potential Criteria .................................................................................................................. 18 2.4 MAPPING LIMITATIONS .............................................................................................................. 20 TEM & SEI Mapping Limitations ....................................................................................................... 20 Terrain Mapping Limitations.............................................................................................................. 21 Terrain Stability and Erosion Potential Mapping Limitations............................................................ 22 3 RESULTS .......................................................................................................................................... 23 3.1 TERRESTRIAL ECOSYSTEM MAPPING ......................................................................................... 23 3.2 TERRAIN, TERRAIN STABILITY, AND EROSION POTENTIAL RESULTS ......................................... 26 3.3 TERRAIN RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................................................................... 28 REFERENCES ........................................................................................................................................... 30 APPENDIX A: FIELD PLOT FORMS....................................................................................................33 APPENDIX B: VEGETATION SPECIES LIST....................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 3Eologlcal Parks, Mombasa and the Indian Ocean Reef
    Er1SLL TER No. 79 - pebruaarA 1990: Meetings are held at The Saracen's Head, Stone St., Dudley. 7.30 for 8 o'clock start. The Society does not provide personal accident cover for "i members or visitors on field trips. You are strongly ad- vised to take out your own personal insur ance to the level which you feel a p propriate. Schools and other bodies The should arrange their own insurance as a matter of course. Forthcoming Mhetings : Black Mortday 26th February: 7.45 p.m. Annual General Meeting followed by illustrated talk "Geology and Wildlife in Kenya" Qin by Sheila Pitts. Sheila was in Kenya in December, 1 88, when she visited the Rift Valley, the Southern National 3eologlcal Parks, Mombasa and the Indian Ocean Reef. o ^ ^ Sheila is a founder member of the society, and has already given talks to the society on her visits to Argentina, the S Antarctic and New Zealand. y Monda : 26th March: Lecture "Geology and Mineralogy of the Caldbeck Fells in Cumbria" by Dr. R. S. :ding. The Caldbeck Fells are in the northern Lake District, and • have always attracted geologists. Although, near to Skiddaw, they are composed of Borrowdale Volcanics -while nearby Carrock yell has a plutonic igneous complex with a series of gabbroic racks and acid granophyres. Numerous minor intrusions occur and the complex is famous for its abundant mineralization including veins of wolfranite, the tungsten ore. Dr. King is Curator of the John Moore Museum, 7 kesbury and was formerly with the national museum of Wales. He is a well- - known authority on minerals and many members will be following his series of articles in GEOLOGY TODAY "Minerals Erolained".
    [Show full text]
  • Exploration in British Columbia 1979
    Exploration in British Columbia 1979 Province of British Columbia Ministry of Energy, Mines and Petroleum Resources British Columbia Cataloguing in Publication Data Main entry under title: Explorationin British Columbia. -- 1975- Annual. With: Geoloey in British Columbia, ISSN 0823-1257; and,Mining in British Columbia, ISSN 0823-1265, continues : Geology, exploration, andmining in British Columbia, ISSN 0085-1027. 1979 published in 1983. Issuing body varies: 1975-1976, Ninistry of Mines and PetroleumResources; 1977- , Ministry of Energy, Mines and Petroleum Resources. ISSN 0823-2059 Ly Exploration in British Columbia 1. Prospecting - British Columbia - Periodicals. 2.Geology, Economic - British Columbia - Periodicals. I. British Columbia.Ministry of Mines andPetroleum Resources. 11. British Columbia. Ministry of Energy, Minesand Petroleum Resources. TN270.E96 1975 622.1'09711 VICTORIA BRITISHCOLUMBIA CANADA AUGUST 1983 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page PREFA V INTRODUCTION ............................................ 1 METALSEXPLORATION 3 Contents ............................................ 3 Review of Metals Exploration and Prospecting . , . 5 Reports on Metals Exploration . 13 STRUCTURALMATERIALS AND INDUSTRIAL MINERALS EXPLORATION ...................................... 325 Contents ............................................ 325 Review of Exploration 011 Non-Metallic Mineral Deposits . 325 Reports on Exploration of Non-Metallic Commodities , . , . , . 326 COAL EXPLORATION . 339 Contents ............................................ 339 Review
    [Show full text]
  • On the Reconciliation of Biostratigraphy and Strontium Isotope Stratigraphy of Three Southern Californian Plio-Pleistocene Formations
    On the reconciliation of biostratigraphy and strontium isotope stratigraphy of three southern Californian Plio-Pleistocene formations Alexandra J. Buczek1, Austin J.W. Hendy2, Melanie J. Hopkins1, and Jocelyn A. Sessa3,† 1 Division of Paleontology, American Museum of Natural History, Central Park West & 79th Street New York, New York 10024, USA 2 Department of Invertebrate Paleontology, Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, 900 Exposition Blvd., Los Angeles, California 90007, USA 3 Department of Biodiversity, Earth and Environmental Science, Academy of Natural Sciences of Drexel University, 1900 Benjamin Franklin Parkway, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103, USA ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION 2006; Powell et al., 2009; Squires, 2012; Ven- drasco et al., 2012). Based primarily on regional The San Diego Formation, Pico Forma- The mid-Pliocene warm period (ca 3 Ma; macrofossil and microfossil biostratigraphy, tion, Careaga Sandstone, and Foxen Mud- Jansen et al., 2007) was a time of high global these units are hypothesized to be late Pliocene stone of southern California are thought to temperatures (2 °C to 3 °C above pre-industrial to early Pleistocene in age (Figs. 1 and 3), but no be late Pliocene to early Pleistocene; however, temperatures) and high atmospheric CO2 con- numerical ages exist to confirm this hypothesis. numerical ages have not been determined. centrations (360–400 ppm) (Jansen et al., 2007). Previous age determinations must be revisited Following assessment of diagenetic altera- These climatic conditions, combined with the
    [Show full text]
  • Staffordshire Geodiversity Action Plan
    Staffordshire Geodiversity Action Plan Laura Cox Geodiversity Officer © 2003/2004 Staffordshire Wildlife Trust Contributors Staffordshire Geodiversity Action Plan Steering Group: Paul Wilcox - SGAP Chairman. Staffordshire County Planning Alastair Fleming - Education Dept, Keele University Sue Lawley* - Staffordshire Wildlife Trust Laurence Crump - Hanson Aggregates Paul Brewer - Tarmac Central Ltd Jonathan Blowers - English Nature Vicki Shenton* - Chairman, SRIGS John Reynolds * - ESTA / UKRIGS Laura Cox* - SWT Geodiversity Officer *indicates members of Staffordshire RIGS group Additional Thanks To: Craig Slawson, Staffordshire Ecological Records Don Steward, Potteries Museum and Art Gallery Keith Ambrose, British Geological Survey Funding Bodies: Aggregates Levy Sustainability Fund through English Nature Front cover photograph: Highshutt Quarry RIGS (L Cox) STAFFORDSHIRE GEODIVERSITY ACTION PLAN i How This Action Plan Should Be Used The Staffordshire Geodiversity Action Plan provides a framework within which various targets and actions are outlined to deliver a sustainable and local approach to the conservation and promotion of the geodiversity of the county. The SGAP is structured around the following key elements: 1. What geodiversity means in Staffordshire and whom it affects – this is detailed in Chapter 1 and explains how the SGAP will focus on target areas to deliver the key aims such as promoting geodiversity, protecting and enhancing SSSI and RIGS sites and their educational and amenity value within the county. 2. SGAP Objectives, Targets and Actions – this represents an integrated approach to conserving and promoting geodiversity in Staffordshire. It provides a summary of the targets and actions that are detailed in the following Chapters. This can be found in Chapter 2 3. The geodiversity of Staffordshire – this is shown through a detailed stratigraphy of the geology of Staffordshire and the use of English Nature’s Natural Areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Geological Survey
    DEPARTMENT OF THE IHTBEIOE BULLETIN OF THE UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WASHINGTON G-UVEltNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1900 [JOTTED STATES GEOLOGICAL StJKVEY (JHAKLES D. WALCOTT. DIEECTOK BIBLIOGRAPHY AND INDEX OF AND MI FOR THE YEA.R 1899 BY FRED BOTJGHTON WEEKS WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1900 CONTENTS. Page. Letter of transmittal...................................................... 7 Introduction............................................................. 9 List of publications examined ...............'.......................;...... 11 Bibliography............................................................. 15 Addenda to bibliographies for previous years............................... 90 Classified key to the index................................................ 91 Index................................................................... 97 LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY, DIVISION OF GEOLOGY, Washmgton, D. <?., June 1%, 1900. SIR: I have the honor to transmit herewith the manuscript of a Bibliography and Index of North American Geology, Paleontology, Petrology, and Mineralogy for the Year 1899, and to request that it l)e published as a bulletin of the Survey. Very respectfully, F. B. WEEKS. Hon. CHARLES D. WALCOTT, Directs United States Geological Survey. 7 BIBLIOGRAPHY AND INDEX OF NORTH AMERICAN GEOLOGY, PALEONTOLOGY, PETROLOGY, AND MINERALOGY FOR THE YEAR 1899. By FEED BOUGHTON WEEKS. INTRODUCTION. The method of preparing and arranging the material of the Bibliog­ raphy
    [Show full text]
  • Upper Carboniferous Rocks
    Bulletin No. 211 Series C, Systematic Geology and Paleontology, 62 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CHARLES D. WALCOTT, DIRECTOR STRATIGRAPHY AND PALEONTOLOGY OF THE UPPER CARBONIFEROUS ROCKS OF THE KA.NS.A.S SECTION GEORGE I. ADAMS, GEORGE H. GIRTY, AND DAVID WHITE WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT FEINTING OFFICE 1903 Q \: 'i b CON-TENTS. Page. INTRODUCTION, BY GEORGE I. ADAMS.....--.....-.....-.......--.-.--.-.. 13 Present condition of reconnaissance work... --.._.._______.____ 13 Purpose of this report.___...----..------_.----__---_._...._..__ 14 Authority and acknowledgments .._..._.._.___-_.-_..-------- 14 STRATIGRAPHY OF THE REGION, BY GEORGE I. ADAMS-.__..____-..-_-._..-- 15 Methods and materials used in preparing this report _-----_-_____---_- 15 Method of mapping employed .-.--.-._.......---............. 15 Area mapped by Adams.. ------------------------------------ 15 Area mapped by Bennett. ..........^......................... 16 Area mapped by Beede. --_--------_---.--------------.-_--.-- 16 Method of correlation ......-----...--..-.....-_.----------... 16 Rules of nomenclature followed ...................1.......... 17 R6suni6 of previous publications --...-----------.----------------.-.- 17 General mapping of the divisions of the Carboniferous of Kansas.. 17 1858, Hayden ................................................ 17 1862, Hayden .....'.........--...-'.--..- .............. 18 1872, Hayden...............-------------------.---------.--- 18 1877. Kedzie _.-.----.-.--.----------------.'.--------.------.-
    [Show full text]
  • External Morphology of Pinus Timleri Seed Cones from the Neogene of the Lower Rhenish Basin, W Germany
    FOSSIL IMPRINT • vol. 74 • 2018 • no. 1–2 • pp. 189–195 (formerly ACTA MUSEI NATIONALIS PRAGAE, Series B – Historia Naturalis) EXTERNAL MORPHOLOGY OF PINUS TIMLERI SEED CONES FROM THE NEOGENE OF THE LOWER RHENISH BASIN, W GERMANY ROLF GOSSMANN1,*, PHILIPP L. KNAUS2 1 Ossietzkystraße 5, D-53123 Bonn, Germany; e-mail: [email protected]. 2 Steinmann Institute, University of Bonn, Nussallee 8, D-53115 Bonn, Germany. * correponding author Gossmann, R., Knaus, Ph. (2018): External morphology of Pinus timleri seed cones from the Neogene of the Lower Rhenish Basin, W Germany. – Fossil Imprint, 74(1-2): 189–195, Praha. ISSN 2533-4050 (print), ISSN 2533-4069 (on-line). Abstract: The external morphology of Pinus timleri seed cones is described from exceptionally well preserved cones and cone fragments from the Lower Rhenish Basin (Germany). The seed cones are asymmetric with a smooth side and erect umbos on the apophyses of the other side. We hypothesise that the smooth side presents the shadow-exposed side while the side with more erect umbos is the light-exposed side as in many extant Pinus seed cones. Key words: morphology, seed cones, Pinus, Lower Rhenish Basin, Germany, Neogene Received: December 31, 2017 | Accepted: April 15, 2018 | Issued: August 31, 2018 Introduction from the Pliocene of the Hambach Mine (details below). A detailed comparison with the characteristics of seed cones The type material of Pinus timleri KINKELIN in which until now were placed in Pinus timleri shows that the ENGELHARDT et KINKELIN, 1908 stems from the Frankfurt Hambach material belongs to the same taxon (Engelhardt “Klärbecken” flora of Pliocene age, which was lost during and Kinkelin 1908, Seward 1919, Mädler 1939, Florin 1963, World War II (for details see Kvaček et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Stratigraphic Linkage of Carbonate-Rich Units Across East
    Geological Survey of Canada Current Research 2000-A18 Stratigraphic linkage of carbonate-rich units across east-central Vernon map area, British Columbia: are Kingfisher (Colby) and Big Ledge zinc-lead occurrences part of the same regional marker succession? R.I. Thompson and K.L. Daughtry 2000 ©Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, 2000 Catalogue No. M44-2000/A18E-IN ISBN 0-660-18010-3 A copy of this publication is also available for reference by depository libraries across Canada through access to the Depository Services Program's website at http://dsp-psd.pwgsc.gc.ca A free digital download of this publication is available from the Geological Survey of Canada Bookstore web site: http://gsc.nrcan.gc.ca/bookstore/ Click on Free Download. All requests for permission to reproduce this work, in whole or in part, for purposes of commercial use, resale or redistribution shall be addressed to: Geoscience Information Division, Room 200, 601 Booth Street, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0E8. Authors’ addresses Robert I. Thompson ([email protected]) GSC Pacific (Vancouver) 101-605 Robson Street Vancouver, British Columbia V6B 5J3 Kenneth L. Daughtry ([email protected]) Discovery Consultants P.O. Box 933 Vernon, British Columbia V1T 6M8 Stratigraphic linkage of carbonate-rich units across east-central Vernon map area, British Columbia: are Kingfisher (Colby) and Big Ledge zinc-lead occurrences part of the same regional marker succession?1 R.I. Thompson and K.L. Daughtry GSC Pacific, Vancouver Thompson, R.I. and Daughtry, K.L., 2000: Stratigraphic linkage of carbonate-rich units across east-central Vernon map area, British Columbia: are Kingfisher (Colby) and Big Ledge zinc-lead occurrences part of the same regional marker unit?; Geological Survey of Canada, Current Research 2000-A18, 5 p.
    [Show full text]
  • Time Machine Biology Cross-Timescale Integration of Ecology, Evolution, and Oceanography
    SPECIAL ISSUE ON PALEOCEANOGRAPHY: LESSONS FOR A CHANGING WORLD TIME MACHINE BIOLOGY CROSS-TIMESCALE INTEGRATION OF ECOLOGY, EVOLUTION, AND OCEANOGRAPHY By Moriaki Yasuhara, Huai-Hsuan May Huang, Pincelli Hull, Marina C. Rillo, Fabien L. Condamine, Derek P. Tittensor, Michal Kučera, Mark J. Costello, Seth Finnegan, Aaron O’Dea, Yuanyuan Hong, Timothy C. Bonebrake, N. Ryan McKenzie, Hideyuki Doi, Chih-Lin Wei, Yasuhiro Kubota, and Erin E. Saupe Credit: Aaron O’Dea, Yuanyuan Hong, Moriaki Yasuhara, Katsunori Kimoto, Jeremy R. Young, Kotaro Hirose, Tamotsu Nagumo, Yoshiaki 16 Oceanography | Vol.33, No.2 Aita, André Rochon, Erin M. Dillon, Briony Mamo Marine geology and marine biology have common origins. The iconic founding hero of this connection was Charles Darwin. – Berger, 2011 ABSTRACT. Direct observations of marine ecosystems are inherently limited in their distribution and relative abundance temporal scope. Yet, ongoing global anthropogenic change urgently requires improved of microfossil species as environmen- understanding of long-term baselines, greater insight into the relationship between cli- tal proxies (Box 1). As a result, CLIMAP mate and biodiversity, and knowledge of the evolutionary consequences of our actions. and related efforts (e.g., the mid-Pliocene Sediment cores can provide this understanding by linking data on the responses of PRISM project or Pliocene Research, marine biota to reconstructions of past environmental and climatic change. Given Interpretation and Synoptic Mapping) continuous sedimentation and robust age control, studies of sediment cores have the have built comprehensive, global data potential to constrain the state and dynamics of past climates and ecosystems on time- sets of microfossil community censuses scales of centuries to millions of years.
    [Show full text]
  • U-Pb and Hf Isotopic Evidence for an Arctic Origin of Terranes in Northwestern Washington
    Western Washington University Western CEDAR Geology Faculty Publications Geology 2018 U-Pb and Hf Isotopic Evidence for an Arctic Origin of Terranes in Northwestern Washington Elizabeth R. Schermer Western Washington University, [email protected] Eric A. Hoffnagle Western Washington University Edwin H. Brown Western Washington University, [email protected] George E. Gehrels William C. McClelland Follow this and additional works at: https://cedar.wwu.edu/geology_facpubs Part of the Geology Commons Recommended Citation Schermer, E.R., Hoffnagle, E.A., Brown, E.H., Gehrels, G.E., and McClelland, W.C., 2018, U-Pb and Hf isotopic evidence for an Arctic origin of terranes in northwestern Washington: Geosphere, v. 14, no. 2, p. 1–26, doi:10.1130/GES01557.1. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Geology at Western CEDAR. It has been accepted for inclusion in Geology Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of Western CEDAR. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Research Paper GEOSPHERE U-Pb and Hf isotopic evidence for an Arctic origin of terranes in northwestern Washington GEOSPHERE; v. 14, no. 2 Elizabeth R. Schermer1, Eric A. Hoffnagle1,*, Edwin H. Brown1, George E. Gehrels2, and William C. McClelland3 1Geology Department, Western Washington University, MS9080, 516 High Street, Bellingham, Washington 98225, USA doi:10.1130/GES01557.1 2Department of Geosciences, University of Arizona, 1040 4th Street, Tucson, Arizona 85721, USA 3Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University
    [Show full text]
  • Estelle Leroux
    THESETHESE / NOM / UNIVERSITE ETABLISSEMENT DE BREST présentée par Soussous le sceau le sceau de l’Universitéde l’Université européenne européenne de Bretagnede Bretagne Estelle Leroux THESE / NOM ETABLISSEMENT pour obtenir le titre de DOCTEUR DE l’ UNIVERSITEpour obtenir DE le titreBREST de Préparée à ’Unité Mixte de recherche (n°6538) DOCTEUR DE L’UNIVERSITEMention Sciences DE BRESTde la Terre Institut Universitaire Européen de la Mer Ecole DoctoraleMention des : SciencesNom de la mentionde la Mer Domaines Océani ques Ecole doctorale des SCIENCES de la MER « Quantification des flux sédimentaires et de la subsidence du bassin Provençal – Annexes : Volume II » Thèse soutenue le 14 mai 2012 devant le jury composé de : Cécile Robin Maître de conférence, Université de Rennes 1 / Rapporteur Jean-Loup Rubino Expert rang Professeur, Pau / Rapporteur Philippe Joseph Professeur ENSPM, Rueil Malmaison / Examinateur Michel Séranne Chercheur CNRS, Université de Montpellier / Examinateur Jacques Deverchère Professeur, Université de Brest / Examinateur Christian Gorini Professeur UPMC, Istep / examinateur et Co-directeur de thèse Laurence Droz Chercheur CNRS, UMR6538, Brest Co-Directrice de thèse (Invitée) Daniel Aslanian Chercheur IFREMER, Brest / Tuteur Marina Rabineau Chercheur CNRS, UMR6538, Brest / Tutrice 2 Liste des publications et communications PUBLICATIONS ACCEPTEES, SOUMISES OU EN PREPARATION ————————————————————————————————————————————————————- (I) F. Bache, S.-M. Popescu, M. Rabineau, C. Gorini, J.-P.Suc, G. Clauzon, J.-L. Olivet, J.-L. Rubino, M.-C. Melinte- Dobrinescu, F. Estradan, L. Londeix, R. Armijo, B. Meyer, L. Jolivet, G. Jouannic, E. Leroux , D. Aslanian, A.T. Dos Reis, L. Macochain, N. Dumurdzanov, I. Zagorchev, V. Lesi´c,D. Tomi´c, M. Namik, Çagatay, J.-P. Brun, D.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology and Hydrology of Lee County, Florida Durward H
    GEOLOGY AND HYDROLOGY OF LEE COUNTY, FLORIDA DURWARD H. BOGGESS MEMORIAL SYMPOSIUM FLORIDA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY SPECIAL PUBLICATION NO. 49 Durward H. Boggess STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION David B. Struhs, Secretary DIVISION OF RESOURCE ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT Edwin J. Conklin, Director FLORIDA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Walter Schmidt, State Geologist and Chief SPECIAL PUBLICATION NO. 49 GEOLOGY AND HYDROLOGY OF LEE COUNTY, FLORIDA DURWARD H. BOGGESS MEMORIAL SYMPOSIUM EDITED BY Thomas M. Missimer and Thomas M. Scott Published for the FLORIDA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Tallahassee 2001 ii LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL FLORIDA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Tallahassee 2001 Governor Jeb Bush Tallahassee, Florida Dear Governor Bush: The Florida Geological Survey, Division of Resource Assessment and Management, Department of Environmental Protection, is publishing as Special Publication No. 49, Geology and Hydrogeology of Lee County, Florida, Durward H. Boggess Memorial Symposium, edited by Thomas M. Missimer and Thomas M. Scott. The information presented herein is valuable in understanding the geology of the aquifers underlying this growing region. It will be useful to state planners and land managers who must make informed decisions about local aquifer uses and resources. Respectfully, Walter Schmidt, Ph.D. State Geologist and Chief Florida Geological Survey iii Printed for the Florida Geological Survey Tallahassee 2001 ISSN 0085-0640 iv CONTENTS Dedication and Editor’s Preface . .vi Acknowledgements . .vii List of Participants and Contributors . .viii Contributions of Durward H. Boggess to the hydrology and geology of Lee County, Florida by Thomas M. Missimer . .1 GEOLOGY The Surficial Geology of Lee County and the Caloosahatchee Basin, by Thomas M. Scott and Thomas M. Missimer .
    [Show full text]