DOCSLIB.ORG

Perspectives on Gender, Race, and Marginality in Ancient Greek Philosophy, Science, and Medicine Fall 2020, Tu 3:00-5:30Pm [Remote Instruction Via Zoom: ##]

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Perspectives on Gender, Race, and Marginality in Ancient Greek Philosophy, Science, and Medicine Fall 2020, Tu 3:00-5:30Pm [Remote Instruction Via Zoom: ##] PHIL211: Perspectives on Gender, Race, and Marginality in Ancient Greek Philosophy, Science, and Medicine Fall 2020, Tu 3:00-5:30pm [Remote instruction via Zoom: ##] INSTRUCTOR Professor Mariska Leunissen Email: [email protected] Phone: 919-962-2280 Office hours: Mo & Tu 10:00-11:00am or by appointment Zoom link for office hours on Monday: ## Zoom link for office hours on Tuesday: ## Webpage: https://spark.adobe.com/page/qClOxwMBnIbSk/ GRADUATE RESEARCH CONSULTANT ## Our graduate research consultant will be available for quick questions concerning the research process throughout the semester by email, and she will also be holding the following scheduled consultations: Week 4-12: a 30-minute consultation for each presenter (or presenting team) to discuss the research question and research plan for the presentation (part d of the handout) for a total of three consultation per week. Please schedule your consultation at least one day before your presentation. (3 presenters x 30 minutes x 9 weeks = 13.5 hours) Week 13-14: a 30-minute consultation for each team working on an adobe spark project to discuss any issues with their research or spark project. Please schedule your consultation at least one day before our project presentations on 11/17. (9 teams x 30 minutes = 4.5 hours) Week 15: 2 hours of scheduled ‘drop in’ office hours (day and time TBA) for individual help with the research paper All consultations will be held through zoom; please email ## to schedule yours. 1 The GRC Program is sponsored by the Office for Undergraduate Research. COURSE DESCRIPTION Why is it that almost all ancient philosophical texts focus solely on the views of the elite male members of Greek society? What happened to the voices of the women, the foreigners (or ‘barbarians’ as the Greeks referred to them), and the less-than- privileged? In this course, we will study – through the examination of several infamous, ignored, or otherwise uncharted Greek texts of the classical period – the views about gender and race as presented in ancient Greek philosophy, medicine, and science. Our aims are to generate a new understanding of how the male elite used such views to further promote or justify (or perhaps challenge) the existing marginalization and silencing of women, foreigners, and less privileged men and to maintain their own social, political, and intellectual privilege. We will also consider how ancient perspectives about these issues remain current and influential today. Some of the questions we will address are: What explanations did the ancient Greeks in the classical period provide for the differences between humans and animals, men and women, slaves and free men, barbarians and Greeks? What role did notions such as racial formation/racial origin play in the development of Classical Greek theories of ethnic superiority (e.g. the myth of Athenian autochthony)? How did they see the relationship between biological descent versus cultural or national identity? How did the Greeks of the Classical Period understand sex and gender? In what ways did ‘scientific’ ideas about women and barbarians influence the ethical and political philosophies of the classical period? How were philosophical theories used to promote, challenge, or maintain the existing marginalization of women and barbarians? This course provides a Course Based Undergraduate Research Experience in Ancient Philosophy. In addition, note that you are able to use this research-exposure course to meet one of the requirements for the Carolina Research Scholar Program transcript designation. Please visit the OUR website to learn more about how you can engage in research while at Carolina. COURSE REQUIREMENTS There are 5 different kinds of assignments to this course; I will use a 100-point grading scale. Assignments Points (1) 3 Presentations (1 as lead presenter, 2 as part of your team); graded 20 (10+5+5) (2) Collaborative Adobe Spark Project/Poster Presentation; graded 20 2 (3) Reading Reflection Reports (10 x 0.5 pages = 5 pages); pass/fail 10 (4) Final Research paper (10-12 pages); graded 40 (5) Class participation and peer feedback; graded 10 (1) Three class presentations (20 points): - 1 presentation in which you take the lead as researcher and presenter (10 points) - 2 presentations in which you are part of the team helping the main presenter with the preparations for their presentation (2 x 5 points) Each student joins one of the nine teams of ‘specialists’, with each team consisting of three students. Each team will develop its own ‘specialization’ by focusing either on one specific genre or on one specific topic, or instead will develop a cross-studies specialization by focusing on different topics across different genres/subdisciplines. These three approaches represent different ways in which scholars work on ancient texts in the hopes of sparking novel and creative research. Students can indicate their preferences for which team they would like to join by filling out the intake questionnaire provided by the instructor to all enrolled students (you can do so at any time by following the link). The instructor will assign students to groups based on their preferences and based on their background knowledge and experience. (Please note: Enrollment for the course will be changed to ‘by instructor permission only’ one week before the start of classes to avoid last minute changes to the teams. We will use the first couple of weeks of the course to make sure everyone is in a team that fits their specific preferences and background knowledge and experiences, and we will make changes if necessary. Petitions to change teams can be made up until 9/1; after that teams can no longer be changed. The course will be capped at 27 students.) Specialists in genre: Group 1: philosophy topics: A1; A2; A3 presentation during week: 5, 8, 11 Group 2: science topics: B1; B2; B3 presentation during week: 6, 9, 12 Group 3: medicine topics: C1; C2; C3 presentation during week: 7, 10, 13 Specialists in topic: Group 4: masculinity topics: A1; B1; C1 presentation during week: 5, 6, 7 Group 5: femininity topics: A2; B2; C2 presentation during week: 8, 9, 10 Group 6: ‘the other’ topics: A3; B3; C3 presentation during week: 11, 12, 13 Cross-fertilizers: Group 7: topics: A1; B2; C3 presentation during week: 5, 9, 13 Group 8: topics: A2; B3; C1 presentation during week: 7, 8, 12 Group 9: topics: A3; B1; C2 presentation during week: 6, 10, 11 Genre//Topic 1. Masculinity 2. femininity 3. ‘the Other’ A. Philosophy A1 (week 5) A2 (week 8) A3 (week 11) B. Science B1 (week 6) B2 (week 9) B3 (week 12) C. Medicine C1 (week 7) C2 (week 10) C3 (week 13) 3 Each team works together in preparing the three presentations assigned to their group. However, for each of the presentations, a different student takes on the primary responsibility for taking the lead in guiding the research and for presenting the materials to class. The other two students help out as part of the research team. These presentations are given during weeks 5-13. Each of the presentations should roughly focus on a selection from the set of primary sources and secondary source as listed on the syllabus for each week, as these are the materials that will be read and prepared by all students. However, students are encouraged to take their presentations and research in their own preferred direction and to supplement the readings as needed/when possible. Students taking the lead for the class presentation are in charge of identifying – in consultation with the instructor and the GRC – their own research question, of guiding their team in searching for additional sources and for putting together relevant materials, and for giving a class presentation based on their joint findings. The lead presenter is also responsible for writing up a short research report outlining the contributions from each of the students to the presentation. Each presentation will take up about 30-40 minutes of class time but presenters should plan on using no more than 15-20 minutes of speaking time so as to allow for plenty of time for discussion and for peer-feedback. The individual presentations should: (a) provide an introduction to and brief overview of the relevant parts of the assigned readings (no need to provide a summary of all the readings and of all the main points made in the secondary literature: the point is to provide the relevant background to the primary text you are interested in); (b) include a close reading of a key passage or set of passages from the primary readings selected by the student and a reconstruction of the main theories/ideas/perspectives offered; (c) help focus the discussion on the most important or interesting issues and puzzles in the primary and secondary readings that are relevant to the student’s own research question by providing a list of 2-4 informed discussion questions; (d) introduce a first draft of the student’s own research question and offer the beginnings of a plan for further research so as to invite peer-feedback on those proposals by providing a short research statement (200 words max) and plan (in the form of 3-5 bullet points listing further steps). The presentation should include a handout that provides: (a) the key take-aways from the assigned readings relevant to your project; (b) the key passage or key passages to be discussed and interpreted in class; (c) a list of 2-4 questions for discussion; (d) and a formulation of the preliminary research question and plan. 4 The presentation will be graded based on the following rubric: Quality
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Diogenes Laertius, Vitae Philosophorum, Book Five
    Binghamton University The Open Repository @ Binghamton (The ORB) The Society for Ancient Greek Philosophy Newsletter 12-1986 The Lives of the Peripatetics: Diogenes Laertius, Vitae Philosophorum, Book Five Michael Sollenberger Mount St. Mary's University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://orb.binghamton.edu/sagp Part of the Ancient History, Greek and Roman through Late Antiquity Commons, Ancient Philosophy Commons, and the History of Philosophy Commons Recommended Citation Sollenberger, Michael, "The Lives of the Peripatetics: Diogenes Laertius, Vitae Philosophorum, Book Five" (1986). The Society for Ancient Greek Philosophy Newsletter. 129. https://orb.binghamton.edu/sagp/129 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by The Open Repository @ Binghamton (The ORB). It has been accepted for inclusion in The Society for Ancient Greek Philosophy Newsletter by an authorized administrator of The Open Repository @ Binghamton (The ORB). For more information, please contact [email protected]. f\îc|*zx,e| lîâ& The Lives of the Peripatetics: Diogenes Laertius, Vitae Philosoohorum Book Five The biographies of six early Peripatetic philosophers are con­ tained in the fifth book of Diogenes Laertius* Vitae philosoohorum: the lives of the first four heads of the sect - Aristotle, Theophras­ tus, Strato, and Lyco - and those of two outstanding members of the school - Demetrius of Phalerum and Heraclides of Pontus, For the history of two rival schools, the Academy and the Stoa, we are for­ tunate in having not only Diogenes' versions in 3ooks Four and Seven, but also the Index Academicorum and the Index Stoicorum preserved among the papyri from Herculaneum, But for the Peripatos there-is no such second source.
    [Show full text]
  • Oriental Foundations of Pythagorean Studies
    Annals of R.S.C.B., ISSN:1583-6258, Vol. 25, Issue 2, 2021, Pages. 479 - 489 Received 20 January 2021; Accepted 08 February 2021. Oriental Foundations of Pythagorean Studies Ruzmatova Gulnoz Miraxrarovna Doctor of Philosophy, Professor of the Department of Philosophy and Logic, Faculty of Social Sciences, National University of Uzbekistan named after Mirzo Ulugbek, Tashkent, Uzbekistan. Abstract:The article tried to cover in detail the socio-philosophical views of Pythagoras, the theory of knowledge, his teachings on the human psyche, oriental motives in the formation of his attitude to man. In the works of Pythagoras there are different interpretations of the myths about the afterlife of the human soul. The question of the eternity of the soul has been shown to be of great importance in the work of Pythagoras. Our goal is to analyze the socio-philosophical, moral views of Pythagoras, as well as the theory of knowledge, his views on man, based on sources. It is revealed that Pythagoras was influenced by ancient myths, the Upanishads, in creating his works. Keywords:Pythagorean philosophy, mythological cosmogony, soul eternity, soul migration, Samkhya philosophy, neo-Platonists, metampsychosis. Introduction It is well known that philosophy is an ancient branch of human spiritual life and knowledge. For almost three thousand years, people in all countries and regions have been in various forms, first in the form of myths, then in the form of certain systems of theoretical structures and whole concepts. crosses the question and tries to answer that question. Now, even at the beginning of the 21st century, there are many theoretical concepts that try to answer the questions posed in the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter IV Book IV
    Book IV 1 WE have thus spoken of the generation of animals both generally and separately in all the different classes. But, since male and fe- male are distinct in the most perfect of them, and since we say that the sexes are first principles of all living things whether animals or plants, only in some of them the sexes are separated and in others not, therefore we must speak first of the origin of the sexes in the lat- ter. For while the animal is still imperfect in its kind the distinction is already made between male and female. It is disputed, however, whether the embryo is male or female, as the case may be, even before the distinction is plain to our senses, and further whether it is thus differentiated within the mother or even earlier. It is said by some, as by Anaxagoras and other of the physicists, that this antithesis exists from the beginning in the germs or seeds; for the germ, they say, comes from the male while the fe- male only provides the place in which it is to be developed, and the male is from the right, the female from the left testis, and so also that the male embryo is in the right of the uterus, the female in the left. Others, as Empedocles, say that the differentiation takes place in the uterus; for he says that if the uterus is hot or cold what en- ters it becomes male or female, the cause of the heat or cold being the flow of the catamenia, according as it is colder or hotter, more ‘antique’ or more ‘recent’.
    [Show full text]
  • Lucyna Kostuch Do Animals Have a Homeland
    H U M a N I M A L I A 9:1 Lucyna Kostuch Do animals have a homeland? Ancient Greeks on the cultural identity of animals The role of animals in ancient Greek culture has been discussed in a variety of contexts, — the relation between human and animal, the moral status of animals, animals in the works of naturalists, animals in tragedy, animals in art, zooarchaeological research. 1 In the literature of ancient Greece, animals are used to represent all things that do not belong to civil society or to the Greek community: slaves, women, and foreign peoples (barbaroi ). Symbolically, animals are often placed outside the country. 2 However, a close reading of texts by Greek authors leads to the conclusion that this is just one side of the coin. The Greeks attributed regional identity to animals, defined by the local geography, and by the history of a region enclosed by borders. At the same time, the world of animals seemed to be ethnically diversified, for the Hellenes coined the terms “Hellenic animal,” belonging to the Greek culture, and “barbaric animal,” belonging to a foreign culture. In this way, Greek animals became an inalienable part of the Hellenic “national” legacy. The Greeks imagined the human world and the world of animals as a world of common borders — there were “familiar” and “unfamiliar” animals at all levels of spatial division. This article, based primarily on literary sources, aims to answer the following questions: How did the ancient Greeks associate animals with space, geography, and their own settlements? Did they attribute nationality and territory to animals? Did they think animals missed their homelands? Could a foreign animal experience a process of cultural integration, namely Hellenization? Animals and Greek civilization .
    [Show full text]
  • How Ancient Greek Philosophy Can Be Made Relevant to Contemporary Life James Duerlinger*
    Journal of Philosophy of Life Vol.1, No.1 (March 2011):1-12 How Ancient Greek Philosophy Can Be Made Relevant to Contemporary Life James Duerlinger* Abstract In this paper, I will explain how ancient Greek philosophy can be made relevant to our lives. I do this by explaining how an instructor of a course in ancient Greek philosophy can teach Greek philosophy in a way that makes its study relevant to how the students in the course live their lives. Since this is the most likely way in which its relevance to contemporary life might be realized in practice, I explain its relevance from this perspective. I contrast the different ways in which ancient Greek philosophy is taught, and give examples of how it can be taught that calls attention to the ways in which what the Greeks said are relevant to how students live their lives. In this paper, I will explain how ancient Greek philosophy can be made relevant to contemporary life. The form in which I will explain this is by discussing how an instructor of a course in ancient Greek philosophy can teach Greek philosophy in a way that makes its study relevant to how the students in the course live their lives, since this is the most likely way in which its relevance to contemporary life might be realized in practice. One of the ways in which many instructors of courses in ancient Greek philosophy attempt to make its study relevant to the interests of their students is to teach the course from the perspective of contemporary analytic philosophy.1 This way to teach the course makes it relevant to students who have a background in contemporary analytic philosophy or wish to pursue a career as a professional philosopher or to seek a historical background to contemporary philosophy.2 A more traditional way to make the course relevant is to teach it as * Professor, Philosophy Department, University of Iowa, 11 Woodland Hts.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cosmological Significance of Animal Generation (.Pdf)
    CHAPTER X: THE COSMOLOGICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF GENERATION **This is a work-in-progress. DO NOT cite without permission** Presented at the Princeton Classical Philosophy Conference, December 7-8 2013. Some context. I am currently working a book on Aristotle’s account of the generation of substances. The central aim of the book is to examine the ways in which Aristotle’s general theory of substantial generation are reflected in, and modified by, his more specific account of the generation of organic substances in the biological works, primarily, the Generation of Animals. My working hypothesis is that Aristotle's mature theory of animal generation is what we should expect when the more generic model developed in the foundational works (e.g. Physics, Generation and Corruption) is understood through concepts specific to the domain of living nature. This places my project within the context of a recent trend in scholarship on Aristotle’s natural philosophy that stresses the importance of integrating his natural investigations into a single explanatory project. This paper will form the basis for the final chapter of that study, which explores the relation between Aristotle’s mature theory of animal generation and his broader cosmology. INTRODUCTION: TWO PERSPECTIVES David Sedley is perhaps the most well-known defender of the cosmological interpretation of Aristotle’s teleology. According to Sedley, Aristotle thinks of the universe as an organized whole whose parts (elements, animals, and plants) are all coordinated in such a way that their mutual interactions contribute to the good of the cosmos and, ultimately, the good of man (Sedley 1991, 180; 2010, 24).
    [Show full text]
  • Neoplatonism: the Last Ten Years
    The International Journal The International Journal of the of the Platonic Tradition 9 (2015) 205-220 Platonic Tradition brill.com/jpt Critical Notice ∵ Neoplatonism: The Last Ten Years The past decade or so has been an exciting time for scholarship on Neo­ platonism. I ought to know, because during my stint as the author of the “Book Notes” on Neoplatonism for the journal Phronesis, I read most of what was published in the field during this time. Having just handed the Book Notes over to George Boys­Stones, I thought it might be worthwhile to set down my overall impressions of the state of research into Neoplatonism. I cannot claim to have read all the books published on this topic in the last ten years, and I am here going to talk about certain themes and developments in the field rather than trying to list everything that has appeared. So if you are an admirer, or indeed author, of a book that goes unmentioned, please do not be affronted by this silence—it does not necessarily imply a negative judgment on my part. I hope that the survey will nonetheless be wide­ranging and comprehensive enough to be useful. I’ll start with an observation made by Richard Goulet,1 which I have been repeating to students ever since I read it. Goulet conducted a statistical analy­ sis of the philosophical literature preserved in the original Greek, and discov­ ered that almost three­quarters of it (71%) was written by Neoplatonists and commentators on Aristotle. In a sense this should come as no surprise.
    [Show full text]
  • Catalogue of Titles of Works Attributed to Aristotle
    Catalogue of Titles of works attributed by Aristotle 1 To enhance readability of the translations and usability of the catalogues, I have inserted the following bold headings into the lists. These have no authority in any manuscript, but are based on a theory about the composition of the lists described in chapter 3. The text and numbering follows that of O. Gigon, Librorum deperditorum fragmenta. PART ONE: Titles in Diogenes Laertius (D) I. Universal works (ta kathalou) A. The treatises (ta syntagmatika) 1. The dialogues or exoterica (ta dialogika ex terika) 2. The works in propria persona or lectures (ta autopros pa akroamatika) a. Instrumental works (ta organika) b. Practical works (ta praktika) c. Productive Works (ta poi tika) d. Theoretical works (ta the r tika) . Natural philosophy (ta physiologia) . Mathematics (ta math matika) B. Notebooks (ta hypomn matika) II. Intermediate works (ta metaxu) III. Particular works (ta merika) PART TWO: Titles in the Vita Hesychii (H) This list is organized in the same way as D, with two exceptions. First, IA2c “productive works” has dropped out. Second, there is an appendix, organized as follows: IV. Appendix A. Intermediate or Particular works B. Treatises C. Notebooks D. Falsely ascribed works PART THREE: Titles in Ptolemy al-Garib (A) This list is organized in the same way as D, except it contains none of the Intermediate or Particular works. It was written in Arabic, and later translated into Latin, and then reconstructed into Greek, which I here translate. PART FOUR: Titles in the order of Bekker (B) The modern edition contains works only in IA2 (“the works in propria persona”), and replaces the theoretical works before the practical and productive, as follows.
    [Show full text]
  • Meet the Philosophers of Ancient Greece
    Meet the Philosophers of Ancient Greece Everything You Always Wanted to Know About Ancient Greek Philosophy but didn’t Know Who to Ask Edited by Patricia F. O’Grady MEET THE PHILOSOPHERS OF ANCIENT GREECE Dedicated to the memory of Panagiotis, a humble man, who found pleasure when reading about the philosophers of Ancient Greece Meet the Philosophers of Ancient Greece Everything you always wanted to know about Ancient Greek philosophy but didn’t know who to ask Edited by PATRICIA F. O’GRADY Flinders University of South Australia © Patricia F. O’Grady 2005 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the prior permission of the publisher. Patricia F. O’Grady has asserted her right under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act, 1988, to be identi.ed as the editor of this work. Published by Ashgate Publishing Limited Ashgate Publishing Company Wey Court East Suite 420 Union Road 101 Cherry Street Farnham Burlington Surrey, GU9 7PT VT 05401-4405 England USA Ashgate website: http://www.ashgate.com British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data Meet the philosophers of ancient Greece: everything you always wanted to know about ancient Greek philosophy but didn’t know who to ask 1. Philosophy, Ancient 2. Philosophers – Greece 3. Greece – Intellectual life – To 146 B.C. I. O’Grady, Patricia F. 180 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Meet the philosophers of ancient Greece: everything you always wanted to know about ancient Greek philosophy but didn’t know who to ask / Patricia F.
    [Show full text]
  • The Polemical Practice in Ancient Epicureanism* M
    UDK 101.1;141.5 Вестник СПбГУ. Философия и конфликтология. 2019. Т. 35. Вып. 3 The polemical practice in ancient Epicureanism* M. M. Shakhnovich St. Petersburg State University, 7–9, Universitetskaya nab., St. Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation For citation: Shakhnovich M. M. The polemical practice in ancient Epicureanism. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies, 2019, vol. 35, issue 3, pp. 461–471. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2019.306 The article explores the presentation methods of a philosophical doctrine in Greek and Ro- man Epicureanism; it is shown that for the ancient, middle, and Roman Epicureans a con- troversy with representatives of other philosophical schools was a typical way of present- ing their own views. The polemical practice, in which the basic principles of Epicureanism were expounded through the criticism of other philosophical systems, first of all, Academics and Stoics, was considered not only as the preferred way of presenting the own doctrine, but also as the most convenient rhetorical device, which had, among other things, didac- tic significance. The founder of the school, Epicurus, often included in his texts the terms used in other philosophical schools, giving them a different, often opposite, content. While presenting his teaching in the treatise “On Nature” or in letters to his followers, Epicurus pushed off the opinions of Democritus, Plato, and the Stoics, but resorted mainly to implicit criticism of his opponents, often without naming them by name. His closest students and later followers — Metrodorus, Hermarchus, Colotes, Philodemus, Lucretius, Diogenes of Oenoanda — continuing the controversy with the Academics and the Stoics, more frank- ly expressed their indignation about the “falsely understood Epicureanism” or erroneous opinions.
    [Show full text]
  • Saint Augustine's Synthesis: a Brief Study of Early Christianity's Debt to Greek Philosophy
    Western Oregon University Digital Commons@WOU Student Theses, Papers and Projects (History) Department of History 1999 Saint Augustine's Synthesis: A Brief Study of Early Christianity's Debt to Greek Philosophy Ross Mailhiot Western Oregon University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.wou.edu/his Part of the History of Religion Commons Recommended Citation Mailhiot, Ross, "Saint Augustine's Synthesis: A Brief Study of Early Christianity's Debt to Greek Philosophy" (1999). Student Theses, Papers and Projects (History). 283. https://digitalcommons.wou.edu/his/283 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of History at Digital Commons@WOU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Student Theses, Papers and Projects (History) by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons@WOU. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]. Saint Augustine's Synthesis : A Brief Study of Early Christianity's Debt to Greek Philosophy Ross Mailhiot Senior Thesis Spring 1999 1 St. Augustine's Synthesis : A Brief Study of Early Christianity's Debt to Greek Philosophy "You stir man to take pleasure in praising you, because you have made us for yoursel{, and our heort is restless until it rests inyou."l This is an often quoted line from the Confessions, written just before the close of the fourth century, and one of many passages pointed to by scholars as evidence of the influence of Greek philosophy in St. Augustine's numerous works. For those of us who need something a little less subtle, Augustine (354-430) spells it out for us by mentioning Plato (428-3478C) and Plotinus QA5-270) on numerous occasions in his wealth of writings.
    [Show full text]
  • Early Greek Ethics
    Comp. by: SatchitananthaSivam Stage : Proof ChapterID: 0004760437 Date:25/2/20 Time:13:07:47 Filepath:d:/womat-filecopy/0004760437.3D Dictionary : NOAD_USDictionary 3 OUP UNCORRECTED AUTOPAGE PROOFS – FIRST PROOF, 25/2/2020, SPi Early Greek Ethics Edited by DAVID CONAN WOLFSDORF 1 Comp. by: SatchitananthaSivam Stage : Proof ChapterID: 0004760437 Date:25/2/20 Time:13:07:47 Filepath:d:/womat-filecopy/0004760437.3D Dictionary : NOAD_USDictionary 5 OUP UNCORRECTED AUTOPAGE PROOFS – FIRST PROOF, 25/2/2020, SPi Table of Contents Abbreviations ix Chapter Abstracts and Contributor Information xiii Introduction xxvii David Conan Wolfsdorf PART I INDIVIDUALS AND TEXTS 1. The Pythagorean Acusmata 3 Johan C. Thom 2. Xenophanes on the Ethics and Epistemology of Arrogance 19 Shaul Tor 3. On the Ethical Dimension of Heraclitus’ Thought 37 Mark A. Johnstone 4. Ethics and Natural Philosophy in Empedocles 54 John Palmer 5. The Ethical Life of a Fragment: Three Readings of Protagoras’ Man Measure Statement 74 Tazuko A. van Berkel 6. The Logos of Ethics in Gorgias’ Palamedes, On What is Not, and Helen 110 Kurt Lampe 7. Responsibility Rationalized: Action and Pollution in Antiphon’s Tetralogies 132 Joel E. Mann 8. Ethical and Political Thought in Antiphon’s Truth and Concord 149 Mauro Bonazzi 9. The Ethical Philosophy of the Historical Socrates 169 David Conan Wolfsdorf 10. Prodicus on the Choice of Heracles, Language, and Religion 195 Richard Bett 11. The Ethical Maxims of Democritus of Abdera 211 Monte Ransome Johnson 12. The Sophrosynē of Critias: Aristocratic Ethics after the Thirty Tyrants 243 Alex Gottesman Comp. by: SatchitananthaSivam Stage : Proof ChapterID: 0004760437 Date:25/2/20 Time:13:07:48 Filepath:d:/womat-filecopy/0004760437.3D Dictionary : NOAD_USDictionary 6 OUP UNCORRECTED AUTOPAGE PROOFS – FIRST PROOF, 25/2/2020, SPi vi 13.
    [Show full text]