DOCSLIB.ORG

Heritage Impact Statement Proposed East Leppington School Commissioners Drive, Denham Court NSW 2565 Project # H-19 069 February 2020

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Heritage Impact Statement Proposed East Leppington School Commissioners Drive, Denham Court NSW 2565 Project # H-19 069 February 2020 Heritage Impact Statement Proposed East Leppington School Commissioners Drive, Denham Court NSW 2565 Project # H-19 069 February 2020 Heritage Impact Statement Proposed East Leppington Public School Commissioners Drive, Denham Court NSW 2565 Submitted to Hansen Yuncken Pty Ltd February 2020 Page | 1 Heritage Impact Statement Proposed East Leppington School Commissioners Drive, Denham Court NSW 2565 Project # H-19 069 February 2020 REPORT REVISION HISTORY Revision Date Issued Revision Description 01 DRAFT 23/11/2018 Revision tracking notes Prepared by Reviewed and Verified by Samara Allen Assistant Heritage Consultant Kerime Danis Brittany Allen Director - Heritage Senior Heritage Consultant 02 FINAL 30/11/2018 Revision tracking notes Prepared by Verified by Samara Allen Kerime Danis Assistant Heritage Consultant Director - Heritage 03 UPDATED 26/08/2019 Revision tracking notes Prepared by Verified by Samara Allen Kerime Danis Assistant Heritage Consultant Director - Heritage 03 UPDATED 26/02/2020 Revision tracking notes Prepared by Verified by Samara Allen Kerime Danis Assistant Heritage Consultant Director - Heritage Disclaimer This report has been prepared by City Plan Heritage P/L with input from a number of other expert consultants (if relevant). To the best of our knowledge, the information contained herein is neither false nor misleading and the contents are based on information and facts that were correct at the time of writing. City Plan Heritage P/L accepts no responsibility or liability for any errors, omissions or resultant consequences including any loss or damage arising from reliance in information in this publication. Copyright © City Plan Heritage P/L ABN 46 103 185 413 All Rights Reserved. No material may be reproduced without prior permission. Page | 2 Heritage Impact Statement Proposed East Leppington School Commissioners Drive, Denham Court NSW 2565 Project # H-19 069 February 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Background ........................................................................................................................................... 6 1.1. Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 6 1.2. The Site .......................................................................................................................................... 6 1.3. Legal Description ............................................................................................................................ 8 1.4. Heritage listing ................................................................................................................................ 8 1.5. Proposal ........................................................................................................................................ 11 1.6. Methodology ................................................................................................................................. 21 1.7. Constraints and limitations ........................................................................................................... 22 1.8. Author Identification ...................................................................................................................... 22 2. Site Context and Description ............................................................................................................. 23 2.1. Site Context .................................................................................................................................. 23 2.2. Site Description............................................................................................................................. 26 3. Historical overview .............................................................................................................................. 29 3.1. Brief Suburb History ..................................................................................................................... 29 3.2. History of the Subject Site ............................................................................................................ 29 4. Assessment of Significance .............................................................................................................. 36 4.1. Understanding Heritage Significance ........................................................................................... 36 4.2. Statements of Significance ........................................................................................................... 37 4.2.1. The Subject Site .................................................................................................................. 37 4.2.2. The Upper Canal ................................................................................................................. 37 5. Heritage Impact Assessment ............................................................................................................. 39 5.1. Statutory Controls ......................................................................................................................... 39 5.2. Campbelltown City Council Growth Centre Precincts Development Control Plan (DCP) 2016 ... 39 5.3. State Environmental Planning Policy (Sydney Region Growth Centres) (SEPP) 2006 ............... 40 5.4. Upper Canal, Pheasant's Nest to Prospect Reservoir, Conservation Management Plan (CMP) 2016 ............................................................................................................................................ 44 5.4.1. Location of the Subject Site within Section 7 of the Upper Canal ...................................... 44 5.4.2. Significance rankings attributed to the Upper Canal and items within Section 7 ............... 45 5.4.3. Assessment of relevant CMP Policies ................................................................................ 47 5.5. Recommended management from SHR Form ............................................................................. 51 5.6. 'Statements of Heritage Impact' (NSW Heritage Manual) ............................................................ 51 6. Conclusion and Recommendations .................................................................................................. 54 Page | 3 Heritage Impact Statement Proposed East Leppington School Commissioners Drive, Denham Court NSW 2565 Project # H-19 069 February 2020 FIGURES Figure 1: Site of proposed new primary school (red) (Source: SIX Maps, accessed September 2018)....... 7 Figure 2: View of the subject site (red) in relation to distance from Sydney Central Business District (blue) (Source: Google Maps, accessed November 2018). .................................................................................... 7 Figure 3: Subject site (red) in relation to 'Upper Canal System (Pheasants Nest Weir to Prospect Reservoir)' (SHR no. 01373). Note: Commissioners Drive has been constructed following this map and is not visible (Source: Growth Centres SEPP 2006, Heritage Map 008). .......................................................................... 9 Figure 4: Subject site (indicated in blue) in relation to the greater Upper Canal System (Pheasants Nest Weir to Prospect Reservoir) (SHR no. 01373) (Source: Heritage Council of NSW, SHR Map). ................ 10 Figure 5: Overall Site Plan (Source: Perumal Pedavoli Architects, Drawing no. 00_S002, Revision A, 15.07.2019). ................................................................................................................................................ 13 Figure 6: Composite Floor Plan - Level 00 Block A & B - Part 1 (Source: Perumal Pedavoli Architects, Drawing no. 00_S011, Revision D, 07.08.2019). ........................................................................................ 14 Figure 7: Composite Floor Plan - Level 00 Block E - Part 2 (Source: Perumal Pedavoli Architects, Drawing no. 00_S012, Revision D, 07.08.2019). ...................................................................................................... 15 Figure 8: Composite Floor Plan - Level 01 Block A & B, Level 00 Block C & D (Source: Perumal Pedavoli Architects, Drawing no. 00_S013, Revision D, 07.08.2019). ...................................................................... 16 Figure 9: Composite Floor Plan - Level 02 Block A & B, Level 01 Block C & D (Source: Perumal Pedavoli Architects, Drawing no. 00_S014, Revision D, 07.08.2019). ...................................................................... 17 Figure 10: Composite Floor Plan - Level 02 Block C (Source: Perumal Pedavoli Architects, Drawing no. 00_S015, Revision D, 07.08.2019). ............................................................................................................ 18 Figure 11: Overall Sections - Sheet 1 (Source: Perumal Pedavoli Architects, Drawing no. 00_S201, Revision A, 15.07.2019). ............................................................................................................................................ 19 Figure 12: Overall Sections - Sheet 2 (Source: Perumal Pedavoli Architects, Drawing no. 00_S202, Revision A, 15.07.2019). ............................................................................................................................................ 19 Figure 13: Elevations - Block A (Source: Perumal Pedavoli Architects, Drawing no. 00_A101, Revision A, 29.07.2019). ...............................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • AGL Leafs Gully Power Project Environmental Assessment MP 08 0077
    VOLUME 3 APPENDICES FEBRUARY 2009 AGL Leafs Gully Power Project Environmental Assessment MP 08_0077 Appendix N Historic Heritage Assessment Gas Turbine Power Station Leafs Gully, NSW Historical Heritage Assessment: Desktop Review May 2007 Navin Officer heritage consultants Pty Ltd acn: 092 901 605 Number 4 Kingston Warehouse 71 Leichhardt St. Kingston ACT 2604 ph 02 6282 9415 A Report to URS Australia Pty Ltd fx 02 6282 9416 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AGL is currently developing a gas turbine peaking project in Leafs Gully, southwest Sydney, NSW. The location of the development is approximately five kilometres from the southern urban fringe of the Campbelltown local government area, six kilometres northwest of Appin village, between about two and three kilometres west of Appin Road, and between 600 m and two kilometres east of the Nepean River. This report provides a desktop review of historical heritage places in the vicinity of the proposed gas turbine power station, and the station’s impact on the heritage significance of those places. Those places include, ‘Meadowvale’ and ‘Mount Gilead’ homesteads, and the Sydney Water Supply Upper Canal system. Findings The study found that: ‘Meadow Vale’: Is classified as an historic site by the National Trust of Australia (NSW); Fulfils NSW Heritage Office significance criteria a (historical), b (personal association), e (research) and g (characteristics) and has moderate heritage significance for heritage listing at a local level; The distant landscape context of Meadow Vale and has little heritage
    [Show full text]
  • M12 Motorway Non-Aboriginal Heritage Thematic Study
    M12 Motorway Non-Aboriginal Heritage Thematic Study Prepared for Transport for NSW December 2020 Document information Extent Heritage #0220110 project no.: Client: Transport for NSW Project: M12 Thematic Study and Interpretation Plan Site location: M12 Motorway Author(s): Helen Munt Document control Version Internal reviewer Date Review type Draft Lucy Irwin 21/09/2020 Alignment with IF Draft Helen Munt 24/10/2020 Revised Draft 1 Final Helen Munt 07/12/2020 Revised Draft 2 Contents 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Background ........................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Sites Identification .............................................................................................. 2 1.3 Site identification ................................................................................................ 2 1.4 Methodology ...................................................................................................... 5 1.5 Why a Thematic Study? ..................................................................................... 6 1.6 Authorship and Acknowledgments ..................................................................... 6 2. Thematic Framework ................................................................................................... 8 2.1 Developing a Thematic Framework .................................................................... 8
    [Show full text]
  • S60666 V3 Cover.Cdr
    Appendix J Appendix J Historic Cultural Heritage Assessment BIOSIS RESEARCH Camden Gas Project: Northern Expansion Part 3A Historic Cultural Heritage Assessment Report for AECOM on behalf of AGL Gas Production (Camden) Pty Limited Final - August 2010 Natural & Cultural Heritage Consultants 8 Tate Street Wollongong 2500 BIOSIS RESEARCH Ballarat: 449 Doveton Street North Ballarat3350 Ph: (03) 5331 7000 Fax: (03) 5331 7033 email: [email protected] Melbourne: 38 Bertie Street Port Melbourne 3207 Ph: (03) 9646 9499 Fax: (03) 9646 9242 email: [email protected] Canberra: Unit 16 / 2 Yallourn Street Fyshwick ACT 2609 Ph: (02) 6228 1599 Fax: (02) 6280 8752 email: [email protected] Sydney: 18-20 Mandible Street Alexandria NSW 2015 Ph: (02) 9690 2777 Fax: (02) 9690 2577 email: [email protected] Wangaratta: 26a Reid Street, Wangaratta Ph: (03) 5721 9453 Fax: (03) 5721 9454 Email: [email protected] Wollongong: 8 Tate Street Wollongong 2500 Ph: (02) 4229 5222 Fax: (02) 4229 5500 email: [email protected] Project no: s5252 / 11944 Author: Fenella Atkinson Pamela Kottaras Reviewer: Peter Woodley Mapping: Robert Suansri Ashleigh Pritchard © Biosis Research Pty. Ltd. This document is and shall remain the property of Biosis Research Pty. Ltd. The document may only be used for the purposes for which it was commissioned and in accordance with the Terms of the Engagement for the commission. Unauthorised use of this document in any form whatsoever is prohibited. Camden Gas Project,
    [Show full text]
  • ANNUAL REPORT 2004–2005 (1300 722 468) Fax: +612 4732 3666
    Sydney Catchment Authority ANNU A L REPO R t 2004–2005 SCA Head Office, Penrith Hours: 9am to 5pm Sydney Catchment Authority Monday to Friday Level 2, 311 High Street Web: www.sca.nsw.gov.au Penrith NSW 2750 Email: [email protected] PO Box 323 Penrith NSW 2751 Sydney Catchment Authority Phone: +612 4725 2100 1300 SCA GOV ANNUAL REPORT 2004–2005 (1300 722 468) Fax: +612 4732 3666 6440-SCA-Cover.indd 1 30/11/05 10:13:58 AM Investing in the future About the SCA 1 Letter to the Minister 2 Report from the SCA Chairman 3 Year in Review (Chief Executive/Managing Director) 4 Report from the Board 8 Principal Legislation 11 Visitor Information Field Office Locations Principal Regulations 11 Warragamba Dam Visitor Centre Goulburn Office Our Corporate Governance 11 Phone: (02) 4720 0349 Suite 5, Newo House SCA Board 11 SCA Organisational Structure 14 Hours: 10am to 4pm every day 23-25 Montague Street Key Areas of Performance 15 except Christmas day Goulburn NSW 2580 KRA 1 – THREats TO WatER 17 and Good Friday Phone: (02) 4823 4200 QUALITY MINIMISED Fax: (02) 4822 9422 f How risks to water quality are managed 19 f How the SCA influences land use and All other dams, reservoirs and camping grounds Hours: 8am to 4pm 20 development in the catchments Phone: (02) 4640 1200 Wednesday and Thursday f How the Healthy Catchments 21 Program achieves its goals Hours: 9am to 5pm daily f Rehabilitating derelict mine sites 26 Monday to Friday Operational offices f The role of catchment audits 27 Cordeaux Dam KRA 2 – SustaINABLE AND RELIABLE 29 WatER SUPPLY Emergency
    [Show full text]
  • Healthy Catchments Quality Water Always
    Sydney Catchment Authority | Annual Report 0607 I Healthy catchments Quality water Always Sydney Catchment Authority | Annual Report 2006–07 Figure 1: SCA drinking water catchments Sydney Catchment Authority | Annual Report 2006–07 Sydney Catchment Authority 1 Annual Report 2006–07 Contents Letter to the Minister 2 About the SCA 4 Our key areas of performance 7 Report from the Chairman 8 Report from the Chief Executive 10 Corporate governance 14 Our organisation 16 KRA 01 Threats to water quality minimised 19 KRA 02 Sustainable and reliable water supply 29 KRA 03 Commercial success 41 KRA 04 Building and sharing knowledge 49 KRA 05 Results through relationships 59 KRA 06 Dynamic, supportive workplace 67 KRA 07 Quality systems and processes 69 Financial reporting 76 Appendices 135 SCA Division Report 157 Glossary 200 Acronyms 201 Annual Report 2006–07 compliance checklist 202 Sydney SydneyCatchment Catchment Authority Authority | Annual | ReportAnnual 2006Report–07 2006–07 2 Sydney Catchment Authority | Annual Report 2006–07 Healthy catchments, quality water – always 3 Above: The Nepean/Avon deep water access project involved constructing a new pumping station at the base of Nepean Dam and a two kilometre pipeline to deliver water to Avon Dam, which supplies the Illawarra. Sydney Catchment Authority | Annual Report 2006–07 About the SCA The Sydney Catchment Authority SCA business plan principles 4 Annual Report 2006–07 Our vision The 2006–07 annual reports for the Sydney Catchment Healthy catchments, quality water – always Authority (SCA) and Sydney Catchment Authority Division of the Government Service (SCA Division) Our key values provide details of organisational performance over the past year.
    [Show full text]
  • Camden Historic Cultural Heritage Assessment 20.09.12
    BIOSIS R E S E A R C H Camden Gas Project Amended Northern Expansion: Historic Cultural Heritage Assessment Report for AGL Upstream Investments Pty. Ltd. October 2012 Natural & Cultural Heritage Consultants 8 Tate Street Wollongong 2500 BIOSIS R E S E A R C H Ballarat: 506 Macarthur Street Ballarat, VIC, 3350 Ph: (03) 5331 7000 Fax: (03) 5331 7033 email: [email protected] Brisbane: 72A Wickham Street, Fortitude Valley, QLD, 4006 Ph: (07) 3831 7400 Fax: (07) 3831 7411 email: [email protected] Canberra: Unit 16 / 2 Yallourn Street, Fyshwick, ACT, 2609 Ph: (02) 6228 1599 Fax: (02) 6280 8752 email: [email protected] Melbourne: 38 Bertie Street, Port Melbourne, VIC, 3207 Ph: (03) 9646 9499 Fax: (03) 9646 9242 email: [email protected] Sydney: 18-20 Mandible Street, Alexandria, NSW, 2015 Ballarat: Ph: (02) 9690 2777 Fax: (02) 9690 2577 email: [email protected] 449 Doveton Street North Ballarat3350 Wangaratta: 26a Reid Street, Wangaratta, VIC, 3677 Ph: (03) 5331 7000 Fax: (03) 5331 7033 Ph: (03) 5721 9453 Fax: (03) 5721 9454 Email: [email protected] Queanbeyan: Wollongong: 8 Tate Street Wollongong, NSW, 2500 Ph: (02) 4229 5222 Fax: (02) 4229 5500 55 Lorn Road Queanbeyan 2620 email: [email protected] Ph: (02) 6284 4633 Fax: (02) 6284 4699 Project no: s5252 / 11944/13343/14975 BIOSIS RESEARCH Pty. Ltd. A.C.N. 006 075 197 Author: Fenella Atkinson Pamela Kottaras Asher Ford Reviewer: Melanie Thomson Peter Woodley Mapping: Robert Suansri Ashleigh Pritchard Biosis Research Pty. Ltd. This document is and shall remain the property of Biosis Research Pty.
    [Show full text]
  • Wilton, Wollondilly Shire LGA, NSW Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Assessment and Historic Heritage Assessment
    Proposed Rezoning “Wilton Junction” Wilton, Wollondilly Shire LGA, NSW Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Assessment and Historic Heritage Assessment Prepared on behalf of Wilton Junction Land Owners Consortium June 2014 Lance Syme FINAL REPORT Suite 203, 1 Centennial Drive Campbelltown NSW2560 02 4627 8622 02 4627 8633 [email protected] Proposed Rezoning “Wilton Junction”, Wilton, Wollondilly Shire LGA, NSW Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Assessment and Historic Heritage Assessment © 2014 Kayandel Archaeological Services This document is and shall remain the property of Kayandel Archaeological Services. The document may only be used for the purposes for which it was commissioned and in accordance with the Terms of Engagement for the commission. Unauthorised use of this document in any form whatsoever is prohibited. I Proposed Rezoning “Wilton Junction”, Wilton, Wollondilly Shire LGA, NSW Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Assessment and Historic Heritage Assessment Executive Summary Kayandel Archaeological Services (KAS) has been commissioned by the Wilton Junction Landowners’ Group (The proponents) to undertake an Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Assessment and Historic Heritage Assessment to inform the proposed rezoning of the Wilton Junction area. The aim of this study is to provide the Landowners’ Group with an assessment of the Aboriginal and Historic (non-Aboriginal) heritage considerations within the Subject Area As indicated in Section 1.1 the NSW Department of Planning & Infrastructure has issued Study Requirements to guide planning investigations for a new town at Wilton Junction. The Study Requirements' relevant to Heritage are to: Undertake an appropriate strategic assessment of Aboriginal and European cultural heritage significance and potential impacts in consultation with the Office of Environment and Heritage and Wollondilly Shire Council's Aboriginal Engagement Officer.
    [Show full text]
  • Wilton Precinct Stage 1: Historical Heritage Assessment and Statement of Heritage Impact
    Wilton Precinct Stage 1: Historical Heritage Assessment and Statement of Heritage Impact FINAL REPORT Prepared for Walker Corporation 25 May 2018 Biosis offices Document information NEW SOUTH WALES Report to: Walker Corporation Newcastle Prepared by: Lian Flannery Phone: (02) 4911 4040 Email: [email protected] Biosis project no.: 26867 File name: 26867.Wilton.HA&SoHI.FIN.20180226 Sydney Phone: (02) 9101 8700 Citation: Biosis 2018. Wilton Stage 1: Heritage Assessment and Statement of Email: [email protected] Heritage Impact. Report for Walker Corporation. Authors: L, Flannery, Biosis Pty Ltd, Wollongong. 26867. Wollongong Phone: (02) 4201 1090 Email: [email protected] Document control Albury Phone: (02) 6069 9200 Email: [email protected] Version Internal reviewer Date issued Draft version 01 TLG 12/03/2018 Final version 01 N/A 25/05/2018 VICTORIA Acknowledgements Melbourne Phone: (03) 8686 4800 Biosis acknowledges the contribution of the following people and Email: [email protected] organisations in undertaking this study: Ballarat Phone: (03) 5304 4250 • Gerry Beasley Email: [email protected] Biosis staff involved in this project were: Wangaratta • Gareth Davies (mapping) Phone: (03) 5718 6900 Email: [email protected] Biosis Pty Ltd This document is and shall remain the property of Biosis Pty Ltd. The document may only be used for the purposes for which it was commissioned and in accordance with the Terms of the Engagement for the commission. Unauthorised use of this document in any form whatsoever is prohibited. Disclaimer: Biosis Pty Ltd has completed this assessment in accordance with the relevant federal, state and local legislation and current industry best practice.
    [Show full text]
  • Ms Naomi Moss Senior Planning Officer Transport Assessments NSW Department of Planning, Industry and Environment 320 Pitt Street SYDNEY NSW 2000
    Our ref: DOC19/896622-12 Ms Naomi Moss Senior Planning Officer Transport Assessments NSW Department of Planning, Industry and Environment 320 Pitt Street SYDNEY NSW 2000 Dear Ms Moss M12 Motorway (SSI 9364) – Comments on Environmental Impact Statement Thank you for inviting the Heritage Council of NSW to provide comment and recommended conditions of approval for the M12 Motorway project. I am responding as the delegate of the Heritage Council. The M12 Motorway will provide direct access between the Western Sydney Airport at Badgerys Creek and Sydney’s motorway network. The M12 Motorway would run between the M7 Motorway at Cecil Hills and The Northern Road at Luddenham for a distance of about 16 kilometres and would be opened to traffic prior to opening of the Western Sydney Airport. A review of the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) documentation for SSI 9364 has been undertaken, in particular: . Section 7.6 - Non-Aboriginal heritage; . Appendix J - Non-Aboriginal heritage assessment report; and . Appendix K - Noise and Vibration assessment report. It is understood from the EIS that after mitigation measures, the project will have heritage impacts on the following heritage items: . Upper Canal System (currently on the State Heritage Register) – Negligible heritage impact; . McGarvie Smith Farm (not currently on the State Heritage Register but assessed as of State significance) – construction and operational impacts – Major heritage impact; . McMaster Field Station (not currently on the State Heritage Register but assessed as of State significance) – construction and operational impacts – Major heritage impact; and . Fleurs Radio Telescope Site (not currently on the State Heritage Register but assessed as of State significance and potentially of National significance) – Minor heritage impact.
    [Show full text]
  • Impacts of Underground Coal Mining on Natural Features in the Southern Coalfield Strategic Review
    Impacts of Underground Coal Mining on Natural Features in the Southern Coalfield Strategic Review July 2008 Impacts of underground coal mining on natural features in the Southern Coalfield: strategic review © State of New South Wales through the NSW Department of Planning, 2008 NSW Department of Planning 23-33 Bridge Street Sydney NSW Australia www.planning.nsw.gov.au ISBN 978 0 7347 5901 6 DOP 08_028 Cover photo: A rock bar and small waterfall on Sandy Creek, just downstream of Fire Road 6C, within Dendrobium Area 3 (Source: Sydney Catchment Authority) Disclaimer While every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that this document is correct at the time of publication, the State of New South Wales, its agencies and employees, disclaim any and all liability to any person in respect of anything or the consequences of anything done or omitted to be done in reliance upon the whole or any part of this document. Maps are included in the report to give visual support to the facts and discussion presented within the report. Hence in some instances the extents and boundaries of the mapped features have been displayed at a different scale than the original data acquisition may have intended. This is particularly pertinent for the larger scale maps. The Department of Planning advises that information presented on the maps should be used as a general guide only and not as the sole basis on which property scale management or resource allocation decisions are made. In particular, care should be taken in basing land use, development, or other decisions on mapped data relating to underground coal mine workings.
    [Show full text]
  • S60666 V3 Cover.Cdr
    Camden Gas Project, Northern Expansion: Part 3A Historic Cultural Heritage Assessment, NSW 2010 FINAL FIGURES BIOSIS RESEARCH 98 MountMount WilsonWilsonBilpinBilpin TaranaTarana MountMount WilsonWilsonBilpinBilpin WoyWoy WoyWoy HartleyHartley MountMount VictoriaVictoria WindsorRichmondWindsorRichmond WindsorWindsor BerowraBerowra HamptonHampton BlackheathBlackheath OberonOberon KatoombaKatoomba MonaMona ValeVale HornsbyHornsby PenrithPenrith BlacktownBlacktown BlacktownBlacktown EppingEpping ChatswoodChatswoodManlyManly BlackBlack SpringsSprings JenolanJenolan CavesCaves ParramattaParramatta MulgoaMulgoa WallaciaWallacia StrathfieldStrathfield SydneySydney BankstownBankstownLiverpoolLiverpool SydneySydney HurstvilleHurstville .. SutherlandSutherland NarellenNarellen CamdenCamden CampbelltownCampbelltown MenangleMenangle PictonPicton AppinAppin BuxtonBuxton BargoBargo BellambiBellambi PointPoint Bioregions (IBRA ver. 6.1) TaralgaTaralga Sydney Basin WollongongWollongong South Eastern Highlands MyrtlevilleMyrtleville MittagongMittagong BowralBowral PortPort KemblaKembla MossMoss ValeVale 00 1010 2020 3030 4040 kilometreskilometres (((( (((( (((( (((( LEPPINGTONLEPPINGTON (( (( (((( (((( (((( (((( (((( (((( MDENMDENMDEN VALLEY VALLEYVALLEY WAY WAYWAY MDENMDENMDEN VALLEY VALLEYVALLEY WAY WAYWAY (((( (((( (((( CACACA (((( CACACA (((( GEORGESGEORGESGEORGESGEORGES RIVERGEORGES RIVERGEORGES RIVERGEORGES RIVER RIVER RIVER RIVER CACACA GEORGESGEORGESGEORGESGEORGES RIVERGEORGES RIVERGEORGES RIVERGEORGES RIVER RIVER RIVER RIVER CACACA GEORGESGEORGESGEORGESGEORGES
    [Show full text]
  • M12 Motorway Thematic Study
    M12 Motorway Non-Aboriginal Heritage Thematic Study Prepared for Transport for NSW December 2020 Document information Extent Heritage #0220110 project no.: Client: Transport for NSW Project: M12 Thematic Study and Interpretation Plan Site location: M12 Motorway Author(s): Helen Munt Document control Version Internal reviewer Date Review type Draft Lucy Irwin 21/09/2020 Alignment with IF Draft Helen Munt 24/10/2020 Revised Draft 1 Final Helen Munt 07/12/2020 Revised Draft 2 Contents 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Background ........................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Sites Identification .............................................................................................. 2 1.3 Site identification ................................................................................................ 2 1.4 Methodology ...................................................................................................... 5 1.5 Why a Thematic Study? ..................................................................................... 6 1.6 Authorship and Acknowledgments ..................................................................... 6 2. Thematic Framework ................................................................................................... 8 2.1 Developing a Thematic Framework .................................................................... 8
    [Show full text]