DOCSLIB.ORG

Hardwoods of North America, Which Are Organized Alphabeti- Cally by Genus

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Hardwoods of North America, Which Are Organized Alphabeti- Cally by Genus Abstract This report describes 53 taxa of hardwoods of North America, which are organized alphabeti- cally by genus. Descriptions include scientific name, trade name, distribution, tree character- istics, wood characteristics (general, weight, mechanical properties, drying, shrinkage, working properties, durability, preservation, toxicity and uses) and additional sources for information. Data were compiled from existing literature, mostly from research done at the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory, Madison, WI. Acknowledgments Sincere thanks to the staff of the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory, for their aid in the preparation of this work. Special thanks to David Green, David Kretschmann, Denise Stoker and Jerrold Winandy of the Engineering Properties of Wood Group, and John Dramm, of State and Private Forestry, Forest Products Labora- tory, for their support and encouragement, and to Mary Collet, Lenny J. Dyer, and Noreen Esser, of the Publishing Center, Forest Products Laboratory, for editing and production of this report. This book is dedicated to the memory of Martin Chudnoff. September 1995 Alden, Harry A. 1995. Hardwoods of North America. Gen. Tech. Rep. FPL–GTR–83. Madison, WI: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory. 136 p. A limited number of free copies of this publication are available to the public from the Forest Products Laboratory, One Gifford Pinchot Drive, Madison, WI 53705–2398. Laboratory publications are sent to more than 1,000 libraries in the United States and elsewhere. The Forest Products Laboratory is maintained in cooperation with the University of Wisconsin. The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Forest Service is a diverse organization committed to equal opportunity in employment and program delivery. USDA prohibits discrimina- tion on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political affilia- tion, and familial status. Persons believing they have been discriminated against should contact the Secretary, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC 20250, or call (202) 720–7327 (voice), or (202) 720–1127 (TTY). Contents Introduction..........................................................................................................1 Acer negundo........................................................................................................4 Acer spp. .............................................................................................................6 Aesculus octandra ................................................................................................10 Ailanthus altissima..............................................................................................12 Alnus rubra ........................................................................................................13 Amelanchier spp..................................................................................................15 Arbutus spp........................................................................................................17 Avicennia spp.....................................................................................................19 Betula spp..........................................................................................................20 Carpinus caroliniana.............................................................................................25 Carya spp...........................................................................................................27 Castanea dentata ..................................................................................................33 Castanopsis chrysophylla.....................................................................................35 Catalpa spp. .......................................................................................................37 Celtis spp. .........................................................................................................38 Conocarpus erectus ..............................................................................................40 Cornus florida.....................................................................................................42 Fagus grandifolia.................................................................................................46 Fraxinus spp.......................................................................................................48 Gleditsia triacanthos.............................................................................................52 Gymnocladus dioicus............................................................................................53 Halesia spp.........................................................................................................55 Hamamelis virginiana...........................................................................................56 Ilex spp. ............................................................................................................58 Juglans cinerea....................................................................................................60 Juglans nigra ......................................................................................................61 Kalmia latifolia...................................................................................................63 Liquidambar styraciflua.........................................................................................65 Liriodendron tulipifera ..........................................................................................66 Lithocarpus densiflorus........................................................................................68 Maclura pomifera.................................................................................................70 Magnolia spp......................................................................................................72 Magnolia virginiana.............................................................................................75 Malus sylvestris..................................................................................................76 Nyssa spp. .........................................................................................................78 Ostrya spp..........................................................................................................81 Oxydendrum arboreum.........................................................................................82 Platanus occidentalis ............................................................................................84 Populus spp. ......................................................................................................86 Populus grandidentata...........................................................................................86 Populus tremuloides.............................................................................................86 Populus spp. ......................................................................................................88 Prosopis spp.......................................................................................................91 Prunus serotina ...................................................................................................97 Quercus spp........................................................................................................98 Rhamnus spp.................................................................................................... 107 Rhus spp. ........................................................................................................ 109 Robinia pseudoacacia.......................................................................................... 111 Salix nigra ....................................................................................................... 113 Sambucus spp................................................................................................... 114 Sassafras albidum .............................................................................................. 116 Tilia americana.................................................................................................. 118 Ulmus spp. ...................................................................................................... 120 Umbellularia californica...................................................................................... 123 References........................................................................................................ 125 Glossary .......................................................................................................... 130 Appendix —Trade Name Index ............................................................................. 136 Hardwoods of North America Harry A. Alden, Botanist Forest Products Laboratory, Madison, Wisconsin Introduction Every week, the Forest Products Laboratory (FPL) receives numerous calls from the public and industry inquiring about wood, especially concerning properties and common names. Much information has been accumulated at FPL in loose-leaf files; the information for a particular wood has been derived from many different sources over many years. Responding to technology transfer requests has required searching these files and copying selected pages
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Tree Species Distribution Maps for Central Oregon
    APPENDIX 7: TREE SPECIES DISTRIBUTION MAPS FOR CENTRAL OREGON A7-150 Appendix 7: Tree Species Distribution Maps Table A7-5. List of distribution maps for tree species of central Oregon. The species distribution maps are prefaced by four maps (pages A7-151 through A7-154) showing all locations surveyed in each of the four major data sources Map Page Forest Inventory and Analysis plot locations A7-151 Ecology core Dataset plot locations A7-152 Current Vegetation Survey plot locations A7-153 Burke Museum Herbarium and Oregon Flora Project sample locations A7-154 Scientific name Common name Symbol Abies amabilis Pacific silver fir ABAM A7-155 Abies grandis - Abies concolor Grand fir - white fir complex ABGR-ABCO A7-156 Abies lasiocarpa Subalpine fir ABLA A7-157 Abies procera - A. x shastensis Noble fir - Shasta red fir complex ABPR-ABSH A7-158 [magnifica x procera] Acer glabrum var. douglasii Douglas maple ACGLD4 A7-159 Alnus rubra Red alder ALRU2 A7-160 Calocedrus decurrens Incense-cedar CADE27 A7-161 Chrysolepis chrysophylla Golden chinquapin CHCH7 A7-162 Frangula purshiana Cascara FRPU7 A7-163 Juniperus occidentalis Western juniper JUOC A7-164 Larix occidentalis Western larch LAOC A7-165 Picea engelmannii Engelmann spruce PIEN A7-166 Pinus albicaulis Whitebark pine PIAL A7-167 Pinus contorta var. murrayana Sierra lodgepole pine PICOM A7-168 Pinus lambertiana Sugar pine PILA A7-169 Pinus monticola Western white pine PIMO3 A7-170 Pinus ponderosa Ponderosa pine PIPO A7-171 Populus balsamifera ssp. trichocarpa Black cottonwood POBAT A7-172
    [Show full text]
  • Department of Planning and Zoning
    Department of Planning and Zoning Subject: Howard County Landscape Manual Updates: Recommended Street Tree List (Appendix B) and Recommended Plant List (Appendix C) - Effective July 1, 2010 To: DLD Review Staff Homebuilders Committee From: Kent Sheubrooks, Acting Chief Division of Land Development Date: July 1, 2010 Purpose: The purpose of this policy memorandum is to update the Recommended Plant Lists presently contained in the Landscape Manual. The plant lists were created for the first edition of the Manual in 1993 before information was available about invasive qualities of certain recommended plants contained in those lists (Norway Maple, Bradford Pear, etc.). Additionally, diseases and pests have made some other plants undesirable (Ash, Austrian Pine, etc.). The Howard County General Plan 2000 and subsequent environmental and community planning publications such as the Route 1 and Route 40 Manuals and the Green Neighborhood Design Guidelines have promoted the desirability of using native plants in landscape plantings. Therefore, this policy seeks to update the Recommended Plant Lists by identifying invasive plant species and disease or pest ridden plants for their removal and prohibition from further planting in Howard County and to add other available native plants which have desirable characteristics for street tree or general landscape use for inclusion on the Recommended Plant Lists. Please note that a comprehensive review of the street tree and landscape tree lists were conducted for the purpose of this update, however, only
    [Show full text]
  • Genetic and Phenotypic Characterization of Figured Wood in Poplar
    Genetic and Phenotypic Characterization of Figured Wood in Poplar Youran Fan1,2, Keith Woeste1,2, Daniel Cassens1, Charles Michler1,2, Daniel Szymanski3, and Richard Meilan1,2 1Department of Forestry and Natural Resources, 2Hardwood Tree Improvement and Regeneration Center, and 3Department of Agronomy; Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907 Abstract Materials and Methods When “Curly Aspen” (Populus canescens) was first Preliminary Results characterized in the early 1940’s[1], it attracted the attention from the wood-products industry because Genetically engineer commercially 1) Histological sections reveal that “Curly Aspen” has strong “Curly Aspen” produces an attractive veneer as a important trees to form figure. ray flecks (Fig. 10) but this is not likely to be responsible result of its figured wood. Birdseye, fiddleback and for the figure seen. quilt are other examples of figured wood that are 2) Of the 15 SSR primer pairs[6, 7, 8] tested, three have been commercially important[2]. These unusual grain shown to be polymorphic. Others are now being tested. patterns result from changes in cell orientation in Figure 6. Pollen collection. Branches of Figure 7. Pollination. Branches Ultimately, our genetic fingerprinting technique will allow “Curly Aspen” were “forced” to shed collected from a female P. alba us to distinguish “Curly Aspen” from other genotypes. the xylem. Although 50 years have passed since Figure 1. Birdseye in maple. pollen under controlled conditions. growing at Iowa State University’s finding “Curly Aspen”, there is still some question Rotary cut, three-piece book McNay Farm (south of Lucas, IA). 3) 17 jars of female P. alba branches have been pollinated match (origin: North America).
    [Show full text]
  • TREE INVENTORY January 2017 DBH Ht Cm M 1 1 Acer Negundo
    TREE INVENTORY January 2017 Tree Nr. of DBH Ht Crown Botanical Name Common name Maturity Health conditions Location # trees cm m Ø (m) leaning, forked @ base 1 1 Acer negundo Manitoba Maple 60 14 19 Mature fair poor as shown into 2 main trunks 5 Fraxinus americana White Ash 7 4 2 Immature fair vines, secondary growth as shown 2 1 Acer negundo Manitoba Maple <5 3 2.5 Immature fair vines, secondary growth as shown 3 1 Tilia americana Basswood <5 3 2 Immature fair vines, secondary growth as shown 4 1 Cornus sericea Red Dogwood <5 2 1 Immature fair on PL 5 1 Acer negundo Manitoba Maple <5 3 2.5 Immature fair vines, secondary growth on PL 6 1 Fraxinus americana White Ash 12 10 3 Immature fair poor vines as shown bark injuries, under pine 7 2 Tilia americana Basswood 11,13 9 4.5 Immature poor fair as shown canopy 8 1 Ulmus americana American Elm 5 3 3 Immature fair as shown 9 1 Fraxinus americana White Ash 30 14 9 Mature fair vines, suckers as shown 10 1 Acer negundo Manitoba Maple 8 5 6.5 Immature fair poor as shown 11 1 Acer negundo Manitoba Maple 20 10 15 Mature poor hazardous, leaning as shown 1- dead, 12 4 Fraxinus americana White Ash 10 9 5 Immature as shown 3-fair 13 1 Acer negundo Manitoba Maple 17 12 13 Immature poor hazardous, leaning as shown 14 1 Fraxinus americana White Ash 30 14 11 Mature fair as shown 15 1 Malus spp Crabapple 7 3 3 Immature poor as shown Page 1 of 5 Tree Nr.
    [Show full text]
  • Common Forest Trees of NC
    FFOORREESSTT TTRREEEESS OF NORTH CAROLINA North Carolina Forest Service TWENTIETH EDITION 2012 North Carolina Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services The North Carolina Forest Service is an equal opportunity/affirmative action employer. Its programs, activities and employment practices are available to all people regardless of race, color, religion, sex, age, national origin, handicap or political affiliation. COMMON FOREST TREES OF NORTH CAROLINA ( R E V I S E D ) A POCKET MANUAL Produced by the North Carolina Department of Agriculture and Consum er Services North Carolina Forest Service Wib L. Owen, State Forester TWENTIETH EDITION 2012 Foreword Trees may be the oldest and largest living things in nature. They are closely associated with our daily lives, yet most of us know little about them and barely can tell one type of tree from another. Sixteen editions of this handy pocket guide have been printed since John Simcox Holmes, North Carolina's first State Forester, put together the first edition in 1922. Holmes' idea was to provide an easy-to-use reference guide to help people of all ages recognize many of our common forest trees on sight. That goal has not changed. Although the book has changed little, some uses of wood and general information about the trees have. Carriages and wagons, for example, aren't often made from Shagbark hickory (or anything else) anymore, and Loblolly pine now is used for making tremendous amounts of pine plywood, something unheard of in the 1920's. Keeping these changes in mind, we revised Common Forest Trees of North Carolina in 1977 and 1995.
    [Show full text]
  • Arcadia at Silverleaf
    Section Six - Landscape Design Mature Size ADWR Common Name Botanical Name (H x W) Size Zone Natural and Transitional Zones Streetscape Enhanced Zone Private Zone TREES X Acacia abyssinica Abyssinian Acacia 20’-25’ 20-25’ M x x X Acacia aneura Mulga 20’ 12’ M x x X Acacia berlandieri Berlandier Acacia 15’ 15’ S x x X Acacia constricta Whitethorn Acacia 10’ 15’ S x x x X Acacia craspedocarpa Leatherleaf Acacia 18’ 10’ M x x X Acacia crassifolia Butterfly-leaf Acacia 10’-15’ 10’-15’ S x x X Acacia gerrardii Gray-thorn Acacia 25’ 25’ M x x X Acacia greggii Catclaw Acacia 10’ 15’ S x x x x X Acacia rigidula Black-brush acacia 10’-15’ 7’-9’ S x April24,2015 October21,2005,revised Design,LLC.,andDCRanchLLC.Allrightsreserved. ©2005 DaleGardon X Acacia roemeriana Roemer Acacia 20’ 25’ M x X Acacia saligna Willow Acacia 15’-25’ 10’-20’ M x X Acacia schaffneri Twisted Acacia 15’-25’ 15’-25’ M x X Acacia smallii (farnesiana) Sweet Acacia 15’-20’ 15’-20’ M x x x X Acacia tortillia Umbrella Thorn 20’-30’ 30’ L x X Acacia willardiana Palo Blanco 20’ 10’ M x x Albizia julibrissin Mimosa 20’-40’ 40’ L x Apple ‘Anna’ Anna Apple Tree 15’ 15’ S x X Bauhinia congesta Anacacho Orchid Tree 6’-12’ 6’-12’ S x X Bauhinia congesta ‘Lunarioides’ Pink Orchid Tree 6’-12’ 6’-12’ S x X Caesalpinia cacalaco Cascalote 15’-20’ 15’ M x x X Caesalpinia mexicana Mexican Bird of Paradise 10’-15’ 6’-12’ S x x X Canotia holacantha Crucifixion Thorn 15’ 10’ S x x x X Cercidium ‘Desert Museum’ Hybrid Palo Verde 25’ 15’ M x x x X Cercidium floridum Blue Palo Verde 30’ 30’-40’ L x x x x Cercidium microphyllum Foothills Palo Verde 20’ 25’ M x x x x X Cercidium praecox Palo Brea 20’ 25’ M x x x X Cercis canadensis v.
    [Show full text]
  • Conocarpus Erectus
    Conocarpus erectus (Button Mangrove, Green Buttonwood) Button mangrove is a broadleaf evergreen trees which can withstand drought, salt, heat and high winds.The fruit looks like a dried raspberry or a pine cone. Its flaky brown bark is very attractive. Throughout the year, greenish-white and purple flowers are produced, but they are not noticeable. Due to the high tolerance of heat and drought it is used a lot in hot and arid climate as hedge, street tree or windbreak. Landscape Information French Name: Chêne Guadeloupe ﺩﻣﺲ ﻗﺎﺋﻢ :Arabic Name Pronounciation: kawn-oh-KAR-pus ee-RECK- tus Plant Type: Tree Origin: Florida and the West Indies Heat Zones: 9, 10, 11, 12, 14, 15, 16 Hardiness Zones: 10, 11, 12, 13 Uses: Screen, Hedge, Bonsai, Specimen, Container, Shade, Windbreak, Pollution Tolerant / Urban, Reclamation Size/Shape Growth Rate: Moderate Plant Image Tree Shape: Spreading, Vase Canopy Symmetry: Symmetrical Canopy Density: Medium Canopy Texture: Fine Height at Maturity: 8 to 15 m Spread at Maturity: 8 to 10 meters Conocarpus erectus (Button Mangrove, Green Buttonwood) Botanical Description Foliage Leaf Arrangement: Alternate Leaf Venation: Pinnate Leaf Persistance: Evergreen Leaf Type: Simple Leaf Blade: 5 - 10 cm Leaf Shape: Lanceolate Leaf Margins: Entire Leaf Textures: Glossy, Fine Leaf Scent: No Fragance Color(growing season): Green Color(changing season): Green Flower Image Flower Flower Showiness: False Flower Color: Green, White Seasons: Year Round Trunk Trunk Susceptibility to Breakage: Generally resists breakage Number of
    [Show full text]
  • Conocarpus Erectus" Plant As Biomonitoring of Soil and Air Pollution in Ahwaz Region
    Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research 13 (10): 1319-1324, 2013 ISSN 1990-9233 © IDOSI Publications, 2013 DOI: 10.5829/idosi.mejsr.2013.13.10.1182 Evaluation of "Conocarpus erectus" Plant as Biomonitoring of Soil and Air Pollution in Ahwaz Region 12Ali Gholami, Amir Hossein Davami, 3Ebrahim Panahpour and 4Hossein Amini 1,3Department of Soil Science, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Khouzestan, Iran 2Department of Environmental Management, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Khouzestan, Iran 4Department of Soil Science, Islamic Azad University, Khorasgan Branch, Isfahan, Iran Abstract: Effects of soil and atmosphere pollution on some heavy metals (Fe, Zn, Pb, Cu, Mn and Cd) concentration in Button-tree (Conocarpus erectus) leaves were studied in the city of Ahwaz (Khouzestan, Iran). Samples were collected from four sampling sites representing area of high traffic density, area future away from traffic and Industrial area. Samples were collected in two stages (May and October) in 2011 for chemical analysis. Samples from village near the city also analyzed for comparison. Based on the results, the stages of leaf sampling did not showed any significant effect on the concentration of the measured heavy metals in leaf samples. Chemical analysis of soil samples at depth of 0-10cm showed that concentration of most of these elements was lower than the maximum recommended levels. Concentrations of measured heavy metals in washed leaves were lower than those of unwashed leaves of Conocarpus and different was significant. In spite of that, there was no significant correlation between the concentrations of heavy metals in washed leaves and soil samples.
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.Crecimiento De Prosopis Nigra (Griseb.) Hieron (Algarrobo Negro) En Santiago Del Estero, Argentina
    Foresta Veracruzana ISSN: 1405-7247 [email protected] Recursos Genéticos Forestales México Giménez, Ana María; Arístides Ríos, Norfol; Moglia, Juana Graciela Crecimiento de Prosopis nigra (Griseb.) Hieron (algarrobo negro) en Santiago del Estero, Argentina Foresta Veracruzana, vol. 5, núm. 2, 2003, pp. 17-22 Recursos Genéticos Forestales Xalapa, México Disponible en: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=49750203 Cómo citar el artículo Número completo Sistema de Información Científica Más información del artículo Red de Revistas Científicas de América Latina, el Caribe, España y Portugal Página de la revista en redalyc.org Proyecto académico sin fines de lucro, desarrollado bajo la iniciativa de acceso abierto Foresta Veracruzana 5(2):17-22. 2003. 17 CRECIMIENTO DE Prosopis nigra (Griseb.) Hieron (ALGARROBO NEGRO) EN SANTIAGO DEL ESTERO, ARGENTINA Ana María Giménez ∗, Norfol Arístides Ríos ∗∗ y Juana Graciela Moglia* Resumen Los algarrobos constituyen una fuente importante de recursos para las zonas áridas y semiáridas sudamericanas. La excelente madera, el uso de las vainas en la fabricación de alimentos, aptitud medicinal y colorantes, confirman su importancia. El algarrobo negro habita en la parte central y norte de la Argentina y junto con el algarrobo blanco, es el árbol por excelencia de la región. El objetivo de este estudio fue efectuar el análisis epidométrico de árboles individuales de Prosopis nigra (Griseb.) Hieron, algarrobo negro, Mimosaceae, el cual fue realizado en 10 individuos adultos de la localidad Sobremonte, Departamento Choya, Provincia de Santiago del Estero, Argentina. La elección de los árboles para el estudio se efectuó siguiendo los criterios de: árbol dominante, sano, DAP superior a 30 cm, fuste sin defectos y copa simétrica.
    [Show full text]
  • Designing and Establishing a Fine Hardwood Timber Plantations
    DESIGNING AND ESTABLISHING A FINE HARDWOOD TIMBER PLANTATION James R. McKenna and Lenny D. Farlee1 Abstract.—Today, new tools and lessons learned from established plantations of black walnut and other fine hardwoods can provide landowners with guidelines to design and establish successful plantations to produce quality timber for the future. From earlier plantations now maturing, we can recognize design features critical during establishment. Current production practices combined with improved tools, ongoing genetic improvement, and lessons learned from various spacing and species mixes make it possible to establish higher quality timber plantations today than previously possible. We summarize new tools for assessing the suitability of soils to grow good walnut and present plantation design strategies to enhance the quality of walnut mixed with other hardwoods to minimize risk if walnut does not grow well. We also include design details that can enhance the aesthetic quality of the land and expand wildlife habitat. As world population increases and available forest new growers will find the background information, lands diminish, timber plantations hold the promise planning considerations, and descriptions of to produce a greater quantity of wood per acre than techniques needed to establish a successful plantation. natural forests (Sedjo 1999, Sedjo and Botkin 1997). Walnut timber plantations on the scale of hundreds to MANAGEMENT OBJECTIVES thousands of acres have been established in the last State your objectives clearly and concisely and see decade in the United States and Europe. Plantation how they fit into your over all land management plan. forestry has become a common practice for many pulp Make a detailed sketch that includes the location of and softwood timber species throughout the world, the plantation and current features as well as those and plantations can be more profitable than natural you might add in the future.
    [Show full text]
  • Potenziale Und Risiken Eingeführter Baumarten
    ine nachhaltige, multifunktionale Forstwirtschaft hat den Anspruch, Wälder so zu pfl egen und zu nutzen, dass deren Produktivität, Verjüngungsfähigkeit, EVitalität und biologische Vielfalt erhalten bleiben. In der Vergangenheit hat sich Band 7 Band 7 Göttinger Forstwissenschaften gezeigt, dass weder im Kielwasser der Rohholzerzeugung noch in jenem des Naturschutzes alle Waldfunktionen angemessen erfüllt werden. Die Integration eingeführter Baumarten in einen Waldbau auf ökologischen Grundlagen erfor- dert daher Kompromisse, die sich auf der Basis wissenschaftlicher Erkenntnisse Torsten Vor, Hermann Spellmann, in der Regel auch fi nden lassen. Konkret bedeutet dies, dass der Anbau nicht Andreas Bolte, Christian Ammer (Hrsg.) invasiver eingeführter Baumarten in gewissem Umfang vom Naturschutz ebenso akzeptiert wird, wie seitens der Forstwirtschaft naturschutzfachliche Interessen Potenziale und Risiken berücksichtigt werden, indem bei ihrem Anbau auf eine räumliche Ordnung ge- achtet wird und bestehende Vorkommen invasiver Baumarten zurückgedrängt eingeführter Baumarten werden. Ziel dieser Ausarbeitung ist es vor diesem Hintergrund, die Potenziale und Risiken von 15 eingeführten Baumarten auf der Grundlage wissenschaft- Baumartenportraits mit licher Literatur und langjähriger Forschungsarbeiten auf Versuchsfl ächen der verschiedenen Forschungseinrichtungen und Anbaufl ächen der Forstbetriebe naturschutzfachlicher Bewertung aufzuzeigen, um die zwischen Naturschutz und Forstwirtschaft aufgekommene Diskussion zu versachlichen. Vor, Spellmann, Bolte,
    [Show full text]
  • Acer Leucoderme Chalk Maple1 Edward F
    Fact Sheet ST-19 November 1993 Acer leucoderme Chalk Maple1 Edward F. Gilman and Dennis G. Watson2 INTRODUCTION This 25 to 30-foot-tall native North American tree is reportedly quite similar to Acer barbatum or Florida Maple and is often seen with multiple trunks (Fig. 1). The chalky white or light gray bark is quite attractive, with the bark on older trees becoming ridged and blackened near the ground. The two to three-inch- diameter, lobed leaves, with fuzzy undersides, give a spectacular display in the fall months, ranging from shimmering yellow to vivid orange and deep red. GENERAL INFORMATION Scientific name: Acer leucoderme Pronunciation: AY-ser loo-koe-DER-mee Common name(s): Chalk Maple, Whitebark Maple Family: Aceraceae USDA hardiness zones: 5B through 8 (Fig. 2) Origin: native to North America Uses: large parking lot islands (> 200 square feet in size); wide tree lawns (>6 feet wide); medium-sized tree lawns (4-6 feet wide); recommended for buffer strips around parking lots or for median strip plantings in the highway; near a deck or patio; reclamation Figure 1. Middle-aged Chalk Maple. plant; shade tree; specimen Availability: grown in small quantities by a small or less identical crown forms number of nurseries Crown shape: oval Crown density: dense DESCRIPTION Growth rate: slow Texture: medium Height: 25 to 30 feet Spread: 15 to 30 feet Crown uniformity: symmetrical canopy with a regular (or smooth) outline, and individuals have more 1. This document is adapted from Fact Sheet ST-19, a series of the Environmental Horticulture Department, Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida.
    [Show full text]