Name * Mark Fuller Email * Mark Fuller
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
From: Wufoo To: Hackett, Richard Subject: Public Comment: Boulder Valley Comprehensive Plan [#17] Date: Sunday, December 04, 2016 4:46:26 PM Name * Mark Fuller Email * [email protected] Phone Number (optional) (303) 579-3238 Address (optional) 7458 Park Place Boulder, CO 80301 United States This comment relates to: * Twin Lakes Rd. Change Request Comment: * I'm opposed to the housing at Twin Lakes open space land. It is a wildlife refuge where we have seen owls, fox, eagles, egrets and other species. development of this area will cause drastic changes to their environments. Please do not build on this sacred land Please check box below * I acknowledge receipt of the Open Records Notification BVCP comments received Dec. 2016 to 8 a.m. Jan. 17, 2017 | Page 1 of 473 | Updated 2017-01-17 From: Wufoo To: Hackett, Richard Subject: Public Comment: Boulder Valley Comprehensive Plan [#18] Date: Monday, December 05, 2016 11:30:29 AM Name * Richard Auletta Email * [email protected] Phone Number (optional) (303) 530-3640 Address (optional) 5981 Wellington Road Boulder, CO 80301 United States This comment relates to: * Twin Lakes Rd. Change Request Comment: * RE: Twin Lakes Reconsideration Hearing Wednesday, Jan. 18, 2017 Irrespective of the rationale or legality of converting open space to additional housing in the Gunbarrel/Twin Lakes area bounded by Jay Road, 75th, and Lookout there is not sufficient infrastructure to support the increase traffic and public transport needs. Already the recent new high density housing in Gunbarrel around Lookout Road around Spine Road has dramatically increased traffic on roads that are not designed or intended to support the increase in traffic all of which travels between Gunbarrel and the City of Boulder. While one might expect most of the traffic to travel on 119 (The diagonal), instead the traffic increase has been on Spine Road, Jay Road, and 75th as drivers avoid the congestion on 119 Diagonal Highway. Jay, 75th, Spine, 61st, 63rd need to be upgraded 4-lane divided limited access highways with separated cycling pathways to meet the peak demand for car, truck, commuter, and cycling traffic. For example the intersection of Jay Road and Spine has become an extremely dangerous intersection in the past year, both for drivers and also for the increased cyclists commuting to Boulder. I have witnessed many drivers running red lights, not to mention a dramatic increase in speeding vehicles on roads that are now as congested as any in Boulder County or the City of Boulder. With the ever promised but never finished bike path connection from Spine to Jay never finished the dramatic increase of commuting cycling on Spine and Jay (45 mph) is a tragedy waiting to happen. Mornings and evenings on Jay between Spine and 119 is now a meat grinder of cars, trucks, and cyclists with cars passing turning cars on the shoulder. In addition RTD has not increased or extended the operational hours of the 205 and 205T routes. Since there is little public transport on weekend evenings there has been a dramatic increase in weekend evening and late night drivers returning from a night out in Boulder on 119, Spine. Jay, 75th, 63rd, and 61st, and Valmont. BVCP comments received Dec. 2016 to 8 a.m. Jan. 17, 2017 | Page 2 of 473 | Updated 2017-01-17 If Boulder County and the City of Boulder have decided to create a satellite city and bedroom community for low wage employees to service the Boulder 1% in Gunbarrel then Boulder County and the City of Boulder should improve the infrastructure to support the commuter and community that is being created first, then add the low wage worker housing. I also believe the conversion of open space created by the citizens and their tax dollars when changed by fiat by elected officials is not only wrong and an irredeemable fracture of the public trust, but criminal and is evidence of malfeasance, misfeasance and nonfeasance by public officials. What is the point of purchasing land placed in the public trust as open space if at any time for any reason it can simply be converted to some other purpose at the whim of a public official. If twin lakes can be converted then is any Boulder County and City of Boulder existing or future open space safe? A very dangerous precedent would be set, both now and in the future. How about a few 50 story high rises in the City of Boulder, say in Chautauqua Open Space first? - Richard Auletta Please check box below * I acknowledge receipt of the Open Records Notification BVCP comments received Dec. 2016 to 8 a.m. Jan. 17, 2017 | Page 3 of 473 | Updated 2017-01-17 From: Rebecca Bradford To: [email protected]; #LandUsePlanner Subject: Land in South Boulder Date: Monday, December 05, 2016 5:21:57 PM Hello to you, Please count me as one of the citizens concerned about the land in South Boulder and the University of Colorado’s intention to develop it. There are many reasons why developing this property is totally out of the question. I'm sure you've heard or will hear about them soon. These reasons are valid, sound and must not be ignored. I implore you to listen carefully to the evidence showing how terribly wrong it will be to develop the land in South Boulder. Please investigate what is true and with integrity. If you haven't done it already, come visit this beautiful piece of property. Remember you are the stewards and the peaceful warriors of this land. Thank you for your time. Rebecca Faith Bradford 4753 W.Moorhead Circle Boulder 80305 303-588-0550 BVCP comments received Dec. 2016 to 8 a.m. Jan. 17, 2017 | Page 4 of 473 | Updated 2017-01-17 From: Katie Wahr To: [email protected]; #LandUsePlanner Subject: CU South Date: Tuesday, December 06, 2016 8:03:52 PM I am writing to express my concern over the proposed annexation and subsequent development of the CU South property. I came away from the community meeting last night (12/5) with the distinct impression that CU will not allow the City to complete the necessary flood mitigation unless they are granted the annexation they desire; they appear to be using this property as leverage. I am shocked and saddened that the need to protect our community from the dangers of floodwaters is contingent upon the University acquiring approval for annexation. We absolutely need to do something to mitigate the future threat of flooding so as not to have a repeat of the disastrous floods of 2013, but is this really the right way to do it? Doesn't CU, as a major entity of this community, have an obligation to amend its land accordingly when failure to do so poses a serious threat to residents? It is my understanding that CU will not even allow the City to use the portion of this property that was initially identified as being the most suitable for mitigation efforts, inasmuch as they want to use that land for development. Are we really going to let the self-interest of this one entity dictate the future safety of our residents? Especially when, as I have recently learned, the land wasn't even slated to become CU property in the first place. Beyond this need for flood mitigation, I am strongly opposed to the annexation and subsequent development that CU is proposing. I have lived in Boulder for all 34 years of my life, and have watched it change from a roomy town with very little congestion to a town that has been filled with people far beyond where it was ever designed to be...I truly feel that Boulder has surpassed its population capacity. Our infrastructure was simply not designed to support the number of people who have moved here. The traffic that this development would bring into CU South would have a tremendously negative impact on South Boulder, an area that is already overrun with cars during rush hour and at the beginning and end of school days. And an influx of CU students into the quiet, family-oriented neighborhood of Tantra and South Creek would dramatically change the feel and quality of life in this area. And last but possibly the most important issue of all: the open space. Our open spaces are so precious to this community. They are one of the major attributes that draw people to Boulder, and one of the characteristics that make it so unique and special. The CU South Open Space provides commuters into Boulder on US 36 with beautiful views of the mountains. It is surrounded by designated Open Space to the east and to the south, providing a large natural buffer between areas of dense human impact. The open space is home to a variety of wildlife and thriving wetlands...wetlands make up less than 1% of all the land in the area, yet are required by up to 80% of all wildlife species in order to complete their life cycles. This is a large piece of land relied upon by a number of different species; it would be devastating to see more land taken away from these creatures who need it the most. BVCP comments received Dec. 2016 to 8 a.m. Jan. 17, 2017 | Page 5 of 473 | Updated 2017-01-17 This piece of land is, for me, one of the most special places in Boulder. I take one to two walks a day out on this property with my dog, and the time I spend there is often the highlight of my day.