DOCSLIB.ORG

Ib Mathematics Comparability Study: Curriculum & Assessment Comparison

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ib Mathematics Comparability Study: Curriculum & Assessment Comparison IB MATHEMATICS COMPARABILITY STUDY: CURRICULUM & ASSESSMENT COMPARISON REPORT FOR IB GLOBAL RECOGNITION, September 2015 Prepared by: Liz Bergeron, Ph.D. University of Wisconsin-La Crosse The summary is based on full reports by Adriana Alcántara and UK NARIC. Adriana Alcántara, Ph.D. UK NARIC International Education The National Recognition Information Centre, Consultant United Kingdom Introduction Purpose and Scope of the IB Mathematics Comparability Study This report summarizes two independently written reports created as a part of the IB Mathematics Comparability Study. The purpose of the IB Mathematics Comparability Study is “to review and compare a selection of well-established mathematics qualifications offered in a range of high-performing education systems around the world whose primary function is to prepare senior secondary students for higher education”.1 In this study, IB’s four Diploma Program mathematics courses – Mathematical Studies SL, Mathematics SL, Mathematics HL and Further Mathematics HL – are compared with five mathematics qualifications chosen on the basis of their market share, the extent of their university recognition, geographical spread and their performance on PISA tests (where relevant):2 1) Alberta Diploma (Canada): Alberta Math 30-1, Alberta Math 30-2, Alberta 31 2) Advanced Placement (AP) (US and Canada, growing overseas market): AP Calculus AB, AP Calculus BC 3) GCE A Levels (England and overseas market): A Level Mathematics and A Level Further Mathematics 4) Singapore-Cambridge GCE A Levels (SIPCAL) (Singapore): Singapore H1 Math, Singapore H2 Math, Singapore Math H3 5) Gāokăo (China): Gāokăo This study is composed of two distinct components: the Curriculum Comparison, which involves a compilation, analysis and comparison of the attributes of these qualifications, and the Assessment Comparison, which involves a comparative analysis of the assessment objectives, assessment methods, and marking guidelines. Dr. Adriana Alcántara performed the curriculum analysis and the National Recognition Information Centre in the United Kingdom (UK NARIC) conducted the assessment comparison. It is important to note the term “curriculum” is used when referring to the content of the qualifications analyzed. Often studies of this nature use the term “standards”. Standards are generally considered the benchmark for judging student progress. Standards outline what students are expected to know at each level. Curriculum is generally understood to be more comprehensive. Curriculum usually refers to the collection of teaching materials used to facilitate student learning so that each student can reach or exceed the standards. Theoretical framework This work extends on two previous alignment projects involving the IB DP. In 2014 Dr. Faas explored the extent the IB DP aligns with national standards in selected regions in Germany and Switzerland3. Additionally, Dr. Conley performed an alignment study between the IB DP and the Knowledge and Skills for University Success (KSUS). Faas’ research compares the DP written curriculum to selected German and Swiss regional curriculums with regard to content, cognitive demand and philosophical underpinnings. The findings suggest that while there is a high level of content alignment between the DP and Swiss and the DP and German curriculums in the natural sciences (biology and mathematics), there is less alignment in the social sciences 1 IB Mathematics Comparability Study Project Plan, 29/01/2015. 2 The focus of this study is on the qualifications themselves, not on the national or state systems that sustain them (in the relevant cases). 3 Faas, D, & Friesenhahn, I. (2014a). Curriculum Alignment between the IB DP and national systems: Germany. Bethesda, MD, USA. International Baccalaureate Organization; Faas, D, & Friesenhahn, I. (2014b). Curriculum Alignment between the IB DP and national systems: Switzerland. Bethesda, MD, USA. International Baccalaureate Organization. 1 and humanities (history and Spanish). The DP also appears to offer greater flexibility than the Swiss and German curriculums, allowing students to pursue their academic interests. In 2009 Conley and Ward4 analyzed the alignment of the IB DP standards and the Knowledge and Skills for University Success (KSUS) and found IB standards to be highly aligned with the KSUS standards. The study also confirmed complete alignment between the IB Diploma’s mathematical studies and the KSUS’ algebra, trigonometry and statistics standards. Methodology There are numerous methodologies for investigating curriculum comparisons5. Researchers often rely on methods like the Webb Model6 or the Achieve Model7 which convene a panel of judges to score intended curriculum using qualitative and quantitative indicators. This can be difficult to apply to the international comparisons required by this study because consistent information is not available for all the courses examined in this research. It is difficult to gather exactly the same categories of data, in the same degree of detail, from a wide range of international educational qualifications, due to language barriers, different rules about the public accessibility and confidentiality of data, or simply different approaches to laying out curricular requirements. Therefore, it is not feasible to establish the uniform scoring categories required by the Webb Model or Achieve Model. To encourage an objective analysis two independent researchers were commissioned to carry out the curriculum and assessment comparisons. Similar to the Webb Model and the Achieve Model, both researchers utilized the intended curriculum in their analyses. The curriculum comparison was performed by Dr. Adriana Alcántara. Data was gathered mainly from primary sources, consisting of the most recent guidance documents and course specifications or guides provided by the administering authorities of each qualification (available on their official websites). Secondary sources were also used to enrich the data, namely existing international studies that have compared various mathematics qualifications. One particularly useful source for this report is Ofqual’s 2012 International Comparisons in Senior Secondary Assessment (hereafter referred to as ICOSSA), which provides a methodological model in some ways, and contains a large amount of detailed data on several of the qualifications included in this study. With regard to concerns over objectivity, the curriculum research highlights similarities and differences between other qualifications and IB qualifications in its analysis and conclusions, but IB qualifications were not used as a benchmark against which to compare the others. In order to establish an external framework for determining certain equivalencies between the qualifications, the textbooks and course outlines used by top global universities in science and engineering were referred to for defining objective categories of mathematics content. The assessment comparison was carried out by UK NARIC. Again, because each qualification being compared had different details available it was difficult to quantitatively score the qualifications. Therefore, a qualitative comparison approach was utilized. To arrive at a point at which reliable comparisons could be drawn between the international awards; it was important to thoroughly explore each qualification and its mathematics 4 Conley, D., Ward, T. (2009). International Baccalaureate Standards Development and Alignment Project. Educational Policy Improvement Center, Eugene, Oregon. 5 Bloom, B.S., Madaus, G.F., & Hastings, J.T. (1981). Evaluation to Improve Learning, New York: McGraw-Hill.; Webb, N.L. (1999). Alignment of Science and Mathematics Standards and Assessments in Four States, Washington: Council of Chief State School Officers.; Faas, 2014 6 Webb, 1999 7 developed by Achieve, Inc. in 2000 (http://www.achieve.org/) 2 programme(s) in isolation, building up comprehensive and objective profiles. The awarding bodies or government websites were reviewed and any publically available documentation was collected. Using this information, or sources provided through the awarding bodies or governments, additional websites providing information pertaining to the international qualifications were reviewed with any relevant information collated. Where documentation was lacking, which was the case for most of the awards, an overall web search was completed for any remaining websites containing information related to the international qualifications. The main documents searched for included: Examination papers and mark schemes Student or teacher handbooks/guides Grade distribution data. The comparative analysis involved comparing each of the IB DP Mathematics courses with the international counterparts considering factual information gathered, with the aim of highlighting similarities and differences. Some aspects of the comparative analysis were, by their very nature, more subjective. It is important however to highlight that UK NARIC, both in its capacity as a national agency and as a credential evaluation organisation rather than awarding body, undertook a fully independent and objective analysis. Curriculum: Overview of Mathematics Similarities and Differences Comprehensive individual profiles for each qualification are available in the full report. Similarities and differences in 1) structure 2) content, 3) cognitive demand, 4) philosophical underpinnings and 5) university recognition for the qualifications are discussed below. In general, it is clear that
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Moulding the Future of Our Nation
    Education Statistics Digest 2014 Moulding The Future of Our Nation CONTENTS Preface …………………………………………………………………………………..……. iii Singapore Education Landscape (Infographics)..…………………………………………. v Overview of the Education System .………………………………………………………... vii Key Educational Indicators …………………………………………………………………. xv PRIMARY, SECONDARY AND PRE-UNIVERSITY EDUCATION, 2013 Summary Statistics 1 Number of Schools by Level and Type …………………………………………… 3 2 Students, Education Officers and Education Partners in Schools by Level…… 3 3 Summary Statistics on Education Officers ………………………………………. 4 Enrolment Statistics 4 Enrolment, Number of Classes and Class Size by Level ……………………….. 5 5 Primary Enrolment by Age and Level …………….……………………………….. 7 6 Secondary Enrolment by Age, Level and Course ……………………….………. 9 7 Junior College / Centralised Institute Enrolment by Age and Level ……….…… 11 8 Number of Schools by Level and Electoral Constituency ……….……………… 12 9 Enrolment by Level and Electoral Constituency ………………………………… 13 Education Officers’ Statistics 10 Teachers’ Academic Qualification, Length of Service and Age by Level……… 15 11 Vice-Principals’ Academic Qualification, Length of Service and Age by Level.. 16 12 Principals’ Academic Qualification, Length of Service and Age by Level …….. 17 Private Schools 13 Statistics on Private Education Institutions …..…………………………………… 18 ITE, LASALLE, NAFA, POLYTECHNIC AND UNIVERSITY EDUCATION, 2013 14 Intake, Enrolment and Graduates of ITE by Course ……………………………. 21 15 Intake, Enrolment and Graduates of LASALLE and NAFA by Course ………... 22 16 Intake, Enrolment and Graduates of Polytechnics by Course …………………. 23 17 Intake, Enrolment and Graduates of Universities by Course …………………… 24 STATISTICAL SERIES 18 Number of Schools by Level and Type …………………………………………… 27 19 Enrolment by Level and School Type ... …………………………………………. 29 20 Primary Enrolment by Level and Stream ……..………………………………….. 30 21.1 Secondary Enrolment by Level and Course …..…………………………………. 31 21.2 Secondary Enrolment by Level and Course ………….………………………….
    [Show full text]
  • Singapore: Rapid Improvement Followed by Strong Performance
    7 Singapore: Rapid Improvement Followed by Strong Performance Singapore is one of Asia’s great success stories, transforming itself from a developing country to a modern industrial economy in one generation. During the last decade, Singapore’s education system has remained consistently at or near the top of most major world education ranking systems. This chapter examines how this “tiny red dot” on the map has achieved and sustained so much, so quickly. From Singapore’s beginning, education has been seen as central to building both the economy and the nation. The objective was to serve as the engine of human capital to drive economic growth. The ability of the government to successfully match supply with demand of education and skills is a major source of Singapore’s competitive advantage. Other elements in its success include a clear vision and belief in the centrality of education for students and the nation; persistent political leadership and alignment between policy and practice; a focus on building teacher and leadership capacity to deliver reforms at the school level; ambitious standards and assessments; and a culture of continuous improvement and future orientation that benchmarks educational practices against the best in the world. Strong PerformerS and SucceSSful reformerS in education: leSSonS from PiSa for the united StateS © OECD 2010 159 7 Singapore: rapid improvement Followed by Strong perFormance introduction When Singapore became independent in 1965, it was a poor, small (about 700 km2), tropical island with few natural resources, little fresh water, rapid population growth, substandard housing and recurring conflict among the ethnic and religious groups that made up its population.
    [Show full text]
  • A Level Further Mathematics Specification
    A Level Further Mathematics Specification Pearson Edexcel Level 3 Advanced GCE in Further Mathematics (9FM0) First teaching from September 2017 First certification from 2019 Issue 3 Summary of Pearson Edexcel Level 3 Advanced GCE in Further Mathematics Specification Issue 3 changes Summary of changes made between previous issue and this current Page number/s issue Content and assessment overview - information about choosing optional 4 papers added in The tables showing the assessment overview for the optional papers has been 5 updated. Paper 1 and Paper 2: Core Pure Mathematics, Section 2.1 – correction to the 9 guidance for deducing roots for cubics. Paper 4A: Further Pure Mathematics 2, Section 2.1 – dy in the integral 23 changed to dx Paper 3B: Further Statistics 1, Section 4.1 – changed to bold text 27 Student malpractice – How to report candidate malpractice updated 56 Staff/centre malpractice – How to report staff/centre malpractice updated 56 Awarding and reporting – information added about taking more than two 56 optional papers. Appendix 9: Entry codes for optional routes – information about permitted 85 entry routes and entry codes updated. Earlier issues show previous changes. If you need further information on these changes or what they mean, contact us via our we bsite at: qualifications.pearson.com/en/support/contact-us.html. Contents 1 Introduction 2 Why choose Edexcel A Level Further Mathematics? 2 Supporting you in pla nning and imple me nting this qualific ation 3 Qua lif ic ation at a glanc e 4 2 Subject content and
    [Show full text]
  • EDUCATION in CHINA a Snapshot This Work Is Published Under the Responsibility of the Secretary-General of the OECD
    EDUCATION IN CHINA A Snapshot This work is published under the responsibility of the Secretary-General of the OECD. The opinions expressed and arguments employed herein do not necessarily reflect the official views of OECD member countries. This document and any map included herein are without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory, to the delimitation of international frontiers and boundaries and to the name of any territory, city or area. Photo credits: Cover: © EQRoy / Shutterstock.com; © iStock.com/iPandastudio; © astudio / Shutterstock.com Inside: © iStock.com/iPandastudio; © li jianbing / Shutterstock.com; © tangxn / Shutterstock.com; © chuyuss / Shutterstock.com; © astudio / Shutterstock.com; © Frame China / Shutterstock.com © OECD 2016 You can copy, download or print OECD content for your own use, and you can include excerpts from OECD publications, databases and multimedia products in your own documents, presentations, blogs, websites and teaching materials, provided that suitable acknowledgement of OECD as source and copyright owner is given. All requests for public or commercial use and translation rights should be submitted to [email protected]. Requests for permission to photocopy portions of this material for public or commercial use shall be addressed directly to the Copyright Clearance Center (CCC) at [email protected] or the Centre français d’exploitation du droit de copie (CFC) at [email protected]. Education in China A SNAPSHOT Foreword In 2015, three economies in China participated in the OECD Programme for International Student Assessment, or PISA, for the first time: Beijing, a municipality, Jiangsu, a province on the eastern coast of the country, and Guangdong, a southern coastal province.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to Prior Learning for Paper 4 Further Probability and Statistics Cambridge International AS & a Level Further Mathematics 9231
    Guide to prior learning for Paper 4 Further Probability and Statistics Cambridge International AS & A Level Further Mathematics 9231 For assessment from 2020 Version 1 Cambridge Assessment International Education is part of the Cambridge Assessment Group. Cambridge Assessment is the brand name of the University of Cambridge Local Examinations Syndicate (UCLES), which itself is a department of the University of Cambridge. UCLES retains the copyright on all its publications. Registered centres are permitted to copy material from this booklet for their own internal use. However, we cannot give permission to centres to photocopy any material that is acknowledged to a third party even for internal use within a centre. Contents Routes through the 2020 syllabus for AS & A Level Mathematics and AS & A Level Further Mathematics 2 What is required from 9709 Probability & Statistics for 9231 Further Probability & Statistics? .........................................................................................................3 Guide to prior learning for Paper 4 Further Probability and Statistics 2 Routes through the 2020 syllabus for AS & A Level Mathematics and AS & A Level Further Mathematics AS & A Level Mathematics (9709) AS & A Level Further Mathematics (9231) AS Level Mathematics A Level Mathematics AS Level Further Mathematics A Level Further Mathematics PaperPaper 1: 1: Pur Puree PaperPaper 1: 2: Pur Pure e MathematicsMathematic s1 MathematicMathematicss 2 Routes which require additional teaching hhh of topics not covered in the combination
    [Show full text]
  • Series: Convergence and Divergence Comparison Tests
    Series: Convergence and Divergence Here is a compilation of what we have done so far (up to the end of October) in terms of convergence and divergence. • Series that we know about: P∞ n Geometric Series: A geometric series is a series of the form n=0 ar . The series converges if |r| < 1 and 1 a1 diverges otherwise . If |r| < 1, the sum of the entire series is 1−r where a is the first term of the series and r is the common ratio. P∞ 1 2 p-Series Test: The series n=1 np converges if p1 and diverges otherwise . P∞ • Nth Term Test for Divergence: If limn→∞ an 6= 0, then the series n=1 an diverges. Note: If limn→∞ an = 0 we know nothing. It is possible that the series converges but it is possible that the series diverges. Comparison Tests: P∞ • Direct Comparison Test: If a series n=1 an has all positive terms, and all of its terms are eventually bigger than those in a series that is known to be divergent, then it is also divergent. The reverse is also true–if all the terms are eventually smaller than those of some convergent series, then the series is convergent. P P P That is, if an, bn and cn are all series with positive terms and an ≤ bn ≤ cn for all n sufficiently large, then P P if cn converges, then bn does as well P P if an diverges, then bn does as well. (This is a good test to use with rational functions.
    [Show full text]
  • SECONDARY SCHOOL EDUCATION Shaping the Next Phase of Your Child’S Learning Journey 01 SINGAPORE’S EDUCATION SYSTEM : an OVERVIEW
    SECONDARY SCHOOL EDUCATION Shaping the Next Phase of Your Child’s Learning Journey 01 SINGAPORE’S EDUCATION SYSTEM : AN OVERVIEW 03 LEARNING TAILORED TO DIFFERENT ABILITIES 04 EXPANDING YOUR CHILD’S DEVELOPMENT 06 MAXIMISING YOUR CHILD’S POTENTIAL 10 CATERING TO INTERESTS AND ALL-ROUNDEDNESS 21 EDUSAVE SCHOLARSHIPS & AWARDS AND FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE SCHEMES 23 CHOOSING A SECONDARY SCHOOL 24 SECONDARY 1 POSTING 27 CHOOSING A SCHOOL : PRINCIPALS’ PERSPECTIVES The Ministry of Education formulates and implements policies on education structure, curriculum, pedagogy and assessment. We oversee the development and management of Government-funded schools, the Institute of Technical Education, polytechnics and autonomous universities. We also fund academic research. SECONDARY SCHOOL 01 EDUCATION 02 Our education system offers many choices Singapore’s Education System : An Overview for the next phase of learning for your child. Its diverse education pathways aim to develop each child to his full potential. PRIMARY SECONDARY POST-SECONDARY WORK 6 years 4-5 years 1-6 years ALTERNATIVE SPECIAL EDUCATION SCHOOLS QUALIFICATIONS*** Different Pathways to Work and Life INTEGRATED PROGRAMME 4-6 Years ALTERNATIVE UNIVERSITIES QUALIFICATIONS*** SPECIALISED INDEPENDENT SCHOOLS** 4-6 Years WORK PRIVATELY FUNDED SCHOOLS SPECIAL 4-6 Years EDUCATION PRIMARY SCHOOL LEAVING EXPRESS GCE O-LEVEL JUNIOR COLLEGES/ GCE A-LEVEL CONTINUING EDUCATION EXAMINATION (PSLE) 4 Years CENTRALISED AND TRAINING (CET)**** INSTITUTE 2-3 Years Specialised Schools offer customised programmes
    [Show full text]
  • Minority Language Issues in Chinese Higher Education: Policy Reforms and Practice Among  the Korean and Mongol Ethnic Groups 
    Front. Educ. China 2016, 11(4): 455–482 DOI 10. 3868/s110-005-016-0037-0 RESEARCH ARTICLE Weiyan XIONG, W. James JACOB, Huiyuan YE Minority Language Issues in Chinese Higher Education: Policy Reforms and Practice among the Korean and Mongol Ethnic Groups Abstract The purpose of this study is to compare Korean and Mongol minorities in the People’s Republic of China in terms of their native language preservation and educational experiences at the higher education level, and to investigate differences and similarities between Korean and Mongol minorities’ language issues. Content area experts on Chinese minority education from China, South Korea, and the United States were interviewed for this study. Findings include suggestions for helping to formulate government educational policies regarding issues related to language in Chinese minority education at the higher education level. This information is helpful to better understand and educate others in school and home settings where Chinese ethnic minority students reside. The advancement of Chinese minority education knowledge related to higher education will significantly strengthen and empower individuals, families, and communities throughout the People’s Republic of China. Keywords ethnic minority education, Chinese higher education, Korean Chinese, Mongol Chinese, indigenous education Background The genocide of indigenous languages has become a global phenomenon under the intensifying trend of globalization (e.g., Fernandes, 2012; Landweer, 2012; * This paper is primarily based on the findings of the Ethnic Minority Trends in Chinese Higher Education Project, which is housed at the University of Pittsburgh Institute for International Studies in Education. Weiyan XIONG (),W. James JACOB, Huiyuan YE Institute for International Studies in Education, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA E-mail: [email protected] 456 Weiyan XIONG, W.
    [Show full text]
  • Further Mathematics HL Guide First Examinations 2014
    Diploma Programme Further mathematics HL guide First examinations 2014 Diploma Programme Further mathematics HL guide First examinations 2014 Further mathematics HL guide Diploma Programme Published June 2012 Published on behalf of the International Baccalaureate Organization, a not-for-profit educational foundation of 15 Route des Morillons, 1218 Le Grand-Saconnex, Geneva, Switzerland by the International Baccalaureate Organization (UK) Ltd Peterson House, Malthouse Avenue, Cardiff Gate Cardiff, Wales CF23 8GL United Kingdom Phone: +44 29 2054 7777 Fax: +44 29 2054 7778 Website: www.ibo.org © International Baccalaureate Organization 2012 The International Baccalaureate Organization (known as the IB) offers three high-quality and challenging educational programmes for a worldwide community of schools, aiming to create a better, more peaceful world. This publication is one of a range of materials produced to support these programmes. The IB may use a variety of sources in its work and checks information to verify accuracy and authenticity, particularly when using community-based knowledge sources such as Wikipedia. The IB respects the principles of intellectual property and makes strenuous efforts to identify and obtain permission before publication from rights holders of all copyright material used. The IB is grateful for permissions received for material used in this publication and will be pleased to correct any errors or omissions at the earliest opportunity. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of the IB, or as expressly permitted by law or by the IB’s own rules and policy.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Reproduction and Migrant Education: a Critical Sociolinguistic Ethnography of Burmese Students’ Learning Experiences at a Border High School in China
    Department of Linguistics Faculty of Human Sciences Social Reproduction and Migrant Education: A Critical Sociolinguistic Ethnography of Burmese Students’ Learning Experiences at a Border High School in China By Jia Li (李佳) This thesis is presented for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy November 2016 i Table of Contents Abstract ........................................................................................................................ viii Statement of Candidate ................................................................................................... x Acknowledgements ....................................................................................................... xi List of Figures .............................................................................................................. xvi List of Tables .............................................................................................................. xvii List of Abbreviations and Acronyms ........................................................................xviii Glossary of Burmese and Chinese terms ..................................................................... xix Chapter One: Introduction .............................................................................................. 1 1.1 Research problem ................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Introducing the research context at the China-and-Myanmar border ................... 4 1.3 China’s rise and Chinese language
    [Show full text]
  • From Carp to Dragon the Shanghai List and the Neoliberal Pursuit of Modernization in Chinese Higher Education
    From Carp to Dragon The Shanghai List and the Neoliberal Pursuit of Modernization in Chinese Higher Education Jeremy Cohen School of International Service: B.A. International Studies College of Arts and Sciences: B.S. Economics University Honors Advisor: Dr. James H. Mittelman School of International Service Spring 2012 2 FROM CARP TO DRAGON: THE SHANGHAI LIST AND THE NEOLIBERAL PURSUIT OF MODERNIZATION IN CHINESE HIGHER EDUCATION Do global university rankings reflect an assimilation of widely held transnational views about education or are these rankings the product of historically and culturally contingent national experience? This study examines how the emergence of the first global ranking—the Shanghai Jiao Tong University Academic Ranking of World Universities (ARWU)—reflects the intermingling of dominant global discourses about higher education with Chinese realities and asks what role ARWU has played in the restructuring of power and knowledge in Chinese higher education under conditions of globalization. A number of methods are employed—including the historical contextualization of ARWU, a critical review of its methodology, and interviews with Chinese students and scholars. The analysis demonstrates that ARWU is both a product and an instrument of neoliberalism in the Chinese context. Allied to a specific discourse of excellence and quality in higher education, it reproduces the national narrative of modernization that is the hallmark of Chinese neoliberalism. ARWU also builds legitimacy for policies that restructure higher education
    [Show full text]
  • AS/A Level Further Mathematics
    AS/A Level Further Mathematics Entry Criteria: You will need to achieve the pathway criteria, please see the prospectus for further information You will need to achieve a Grade 7 or above in GCSE Mathematics Coursework/Examination Requirements: AS Assessment Two examinations worth 50% each A Level Assessment Four examinations worth 25% each Awarding Body/Specifications: Edexcel Advanced Level (A Level): Further Mathematics builds on the knowledge of A Level Mathematics and involves the further study of Pure Mathematics as well as the study of two optional units chosen from: Further Pure Mathematics, Statistics, Mechanics or Decision. Further Mathematics provides a greater challenge for those students who demonstrate a talent for Mathematics. For degree level study of Mathematics and mathematically-related subjects, it is a distinct advantage. At some of the top universities, A Level Further Mathematics is a requirement to study this course. The following units will be covered on this course: Pure Mathematics – Compulsory Content Statistics – Optional Unit Topics studied include proof, complex numbers, matrices, further algebra and Topics include discrete probability distributions, Poisson and binomial functions, further calculus, further vectors, polar coordinates, hyperbolic distributions, geometric and negative binomial distributions, hypothesis testing, functions and differential equations. central limit theorem, chi squared tests, probability generating functions and quality of tests. Students will complete two of the four following units: Mechanics – Optional Unit Further Pure – Optional Unit Topics include momentum and impulse, energy and power, elastic strings and Topics include further trigonometry, further calculus, further differential springs and elastic energy and elastic collisions in one and two dimensions. equations, coordinate systems, further vectors, further numerical methods and Decision – Optional Unit inequalities.
    [Show full text]