The Structural Integrity of the Lomonosov Ridge with the North American and Siberian Continental Margins

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Structural Integrity of the Lomonosov Ridge with the North American and Siberian Continental Margins The structural integrity of the Lomonosov Ridge with the North American and Siberian continental margins V. Poselov1, V. Butsenko1, A. Chernykh1, V. Glebovsky1, H. R. Jackson2, D. P. Potter2, G. Oakey2, J. Shimeld2 and C. Marcussen3 1I.S. Gramberg Research Institute for Geology and Mineral Resources of the World Ocean ‘VNIIOkeangeologia’, 1 Angliysky Ave., 190121 St. Petersburg, Russia 2Geological Survey of Canada Atlantic, Box 1006 Dartmouth, N.S., B2Y 4A2 Canada 3Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland (GEUS), Øster Voldgade 10, 1350 Copenhagen K, Denmark ABSTRACT support earlier interpretations of the Lomonosov The Lomonosov Ridge crosses the Arctic Ridge as a separate microcontinent. Ocean connecting the North American and Siberian margins. The Ridge consists of a number of linear, INTRODUCTION parallel topographic highs that deepen toward the The Lomonosov Ridge, approximately 1700 km adjacent basins where they are buried by sediments. long, has a sinuous shape (Fig.1). The Ridge is named Bathymetric, seismic reflection, refraction, and after the Russian polymath Mikhail Vasilyevich Lo- potential field data show that the structure of the monosov. It was first mapped by the Russian high lat- Ridge is continuous with the adjacent continental itude air borne surveys of 1948. In 1954 it was shown margins. The sedimentary section on the Lomonosov on the bathymetric map of the Arctic Ocean (Burkan- Ridge can be traced from the North American margin ov 1954). The first bathymetric measurements on across the Pole to the Siberian margin. A reflection the Lomonosov Ridge available in western literature profile shot in the transition from the Siberian margin were made close to the pole during the First (1967) to the Lomonosov Ridge demonstrates that the strong and Second (1969) Canadian North Pole expeditions regional unconformity at the base of the hemipelagic (Weber 1983; Weber and Sweeney 1985). sedimentary unit. The entire sedimentary section The Lomonosov Ridge width varies between and the acoustic basement can be clearly followed 50 and 200 km. Its flanks rise steeply from the from the margin along the Ridge. The continuity of 3900 - 4200 m deep basins on each side to a depth sedimentary and crustal units is confirmed on the of typically 1000 - 1300 m below sea level (Weber coincident wide angle seismic reflection/refraction 1979; Bjork et al. 2007). The steep sides and the saw- profile. Magnetic data at the intersection of the Ridge toothed crest of the Ridge are typical of continental with the North American margin reveal the edge of block faulting. Seismic reflection profiles that the Pearya Terrane extending from Ellesmere Island show an angular unconformity in the sedimentary onto the Lomonosov Ridge. Furthermore, with section on the Ridge beneath the drilled Tertiary the Eurasia Basin closed the magnetic anomalies section (Jokat et al. 1992) have a distinct continental associated with Early Cretaceous dyke swarms character. The refraction velocities on the Ridge are can be traced from Franz Josef Land via the comparable with those on the Barents and Kara seas Lomonosov Ridge to the Alpha Ridge and from the shelves (Forsyth and Mair 1984), and gravity models North American polar margin to the Alpha Ridge. controlled by wide angle reflection/refraction (WAR) The distribution of the dykes suggests that since profiles (Weber and Sweeney 1985) also indicate a their emplacement the Lomonosov Ridge has been continental origin of the Ridge. In addition, the fit of stable with respect to the North American margin the Lomonosov Ridge morphological configuration and remained in close proximity to the Barents Sea with that of the conjugate Eurasia Basin margin margin until separation of the North American and suggests that the Ridge is a continental sliver Eurasian plates, as predicted by plate reconstructions separated by seafloor spreading from the Barents- based on magnetic lineations. The geomorphological Kara seas crustal block (e.g. Srivastava and Tapscott and geophysical data presented in the paper do not 1986). ICAM VI Proceedings 233 Fig. 1. Bathymetric map of the Arctic Ocean showing the location of seismic reflection lines in black and wide angle reflection/refraction lines in red described in the text. The black boxes labeled A and B are the position of the magnetic surveys shown in Figure 10. The black box labeled C is the location of gravity and magnetic surveys presented in Figure 11. The Lomonosov Ridge divides the Arctic Ocean of North America (e.g. Ostenso 1974). Another into two major deep basins (Fig. 2a): the Eurasia and transform model has the Siberian margin rifted from the Amerasia basins. It has been called a double- the Queen Elizabeth Islands with shearing along the sided continental margin (Jokat et al. 1992). The Alaska margin and Lomonosov Ridge (e.g. Herron Eurasia Basin with its two sub-basins, the Amundsen et el. 1974). The rotational model for the opening and Nansen basins (Fig. 1), was created by Cenozoic of the Amerasia Basin with Alaska rifted away sea floor spreading revealed by lineated seafloor from the Queen Elizabeth Islands margin was first spreading anomalies. This is due to the difficulties suggested by Carey (1958) and continues to be in interpreting chaotic high amplitude magnetic the option supported by the majority of researches anomalies associated with the Alpha-Mendeleev (e.g. Cochran et al. 2006). The rotational model is ridges, the weak magnetic lineations in the Canada consistent with paleomagnetic data from Alaska Basin and the scarcity of bedrock samples. Several (Halgedahl and Jarrard 1987) and restores Mesozoic different geodynamic models have been suggested geology of the Queen Elizabeth Islands with that on for the Amerasia Basin, such as rifting of Alaska the Alaskan margin (Embry 1990). The rotational from the Lomonosov Ridge requiring transform option predicts that the Amerasia Basin side of the motion along the Queen Elizabeth Islands margin Lomonosov Ridge is a sheared margin. 234 V. Poselov Fig. 2. Bathymetric map of the Arctic Ocean (section ‘a’) with the yellow line along the length the Lomonosov Ridge indicating the position of the bathymetric profile presented in section ‘b’. The black box labeled ‘c’ indicates the region of detailed bathymetric surveys. The dots on section ‘c’ are the locations of spot soundings. The north-south line with closely spaced dots is the location of the LORITA wide angle reflection/refraction profile. The orange short lines are the location of seismic reflection profiles. Significant new data collected by agencies in relative to the margins along major transform faults Canada, Denmark and Russia over the Lomonosov is required. Ridge (Fig. 1) are presented that provide information In 1992 for the first time, the Polar Marine on the continental affinities of the Ridge and its Geosurvey Expedition (PMGE) under the auspices transition to the adjacent continental margins. A of the Ministry of Natural Resources and Environ- major question addressed is whether the geophysical ment of the Russian Federation carried out WAR data can be explained by plate reconstructions observations over the Lomonosov Ridge and the ad- with the Lomonosov Ridge remaining fixed with jacent Amundsen and Podvodnikov-Makarov basins respect to the continental margins of North America (Fig. 1). In addition, aeromagnetic mapping in a belt and Siberia, or whether displacement of the Ridge 100 km wide was acquired along the WAR profile. ICAM VI Proceedings 235 In 2007, VNIIOkeanologia and the Marine Arctic m. At the 1000 m contour the plateau is about 200 Geological Expedition (MAGE) were charged by km wide. Further north the Lomonosov Ridge has the Federal Agency for Mineral Resources of the a width of about 70 km at the 1500 m contour. On Russian Federation (Rosnedra) to perform integrat- a bathymetric profile (Fig. 2b) slightly westward of ed geological and geophysical investigations on the the location of the LORITA profile, the topography Lomonosov Ridge and the adjacent Siberian Shelf. across the trough and over the plateau is not The range of scientific observations included WAR significantly different from the regional variations measurements, multichannel seismic reflection pro- observed along the length of the Lomonosov Ridge. filing and potential field (gravity and magnetic) mea- For instance, greater water depths are observed near surements in a belt 100 km wide along the WAR line. the Pole where there is an internal valley in the Ridge The Geological Surveys of Canada (GSC) and or towards the Siberian margin (at about 700 km on Denmark and Greenland (GEUS) acquired WAR figure 2b) where one limb of the sub-parallel ridges data and limited reflection profiling over the junction that form the Lomonosov Ridge is crossed. of the Lomonosov Ridge with the Greenland and The transition from the Siberian margin to the Ellesmere Island continental margin in 2006. In 2007 Lomonosov Ridge (Fig. 1 and 2) is smooth for the and 2009 on LOMROG I and II ship-based programs, first 200 km from the shelf. The water depth increases seismic reflection profiles on the Lomonosov Ridge steadily from about 200 m to 1750 m over about 200 were collected by GEUS that are also shown here. km. Further northward the Lomonosov Ridge is In this paper the Lomonosov Ridge will be made up of a complex of ridges and basins as seen described from the continental shelves towards the in the rugged topography. A consistent feature of this North Pole through successive data sets beginning region of the Lomonosov Ridge is a series of parallel with bathymetry and continuing with data that ridges with a width of over 200 km extending south to investigate the sedimentary and crustal structure. at least 82°30’ N and, based on gravity data, perhaps to the Siberian Margin (Cochran et al. 2006). BATHYMETRY The contours on the International Bathymetric SEISMIC REFLECTION DATA Chart of the Arctic Ocean (IBCAO version 2.0) Near the North American margin (Jakobsson et al.
Recommended publications
  • Handbok07.Pdf
    - . - - - . -. � ..;/, AGE MILL.YEAR$ ;YE basalt �- OUATERNARY votcanoes CENOZOIC \....t TERTIARY ·· basalt/// 65 CRETACEOUS -� 145 MESOZOIC JURASSIC " 210 � TRIAS SIC 245 " PERMIAN 290 CARBONIFEROUS /I/ Å 360 \....t DEVONIAN � PALEOZOIC � 410 SILURIAN 440 /I/ ranite � ORDOVICIAN T 510 z CAM BRIAN � w :::;: 570 w UPPER (J) PROTEROZOIC � c( " 1000 Ill /// PRECAMBRIAN MIDDLE AND LOWER PROTEROZOIC I /// 2500 ARCHEAN /(/folding \....tfaulting x metamorphism '- subduction POLARHÅNDBOK NO. 7 AUDUN HJELLE GEOLOGY.OF SVALBARD OSLO 1993 Photographs contributed by the following: Dallmann, Winfried: Figs. 12, 21, 24, 25, 31, 33, 35, 48 Heintz, Natascha: Figs. 15, 59 Hisdal, Vidar: Figs. 40, 42, 47, 49 Hjelle, Audun: Figs. 3, 10, 11, 18 , 23, 28, 29, 30, 32, 36, 43, 45, 46, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 71, 72, 75 Larsen, Geir B.: Fig. 70 Lytskjold, Bjørn: Fig. 38 Nøttvedt, Arvid: Fig. 34 Paleontologisk Museum, Oslo: Figs. 5, 9 Salvigsen, Otto: Figs. 13, 59 Skogen, Erik: Fig. 39 Store Norske Spitsbergen Kulkompani (SNSK): Fig. 26 © Norsk Polarinstitutt, Middelthuns gate 29, 0301 Oslo English translation: Richard Binns Editor of text and illustrations: Annemor Brekke Graphic design: Vidar Grimshei Omslagsfoto: Erik Skogen Graphic production: Grimshei Grafiske, Lørenskog ISBN 82-7666-057-6 Printed September 1993 CONTENTS PREFACE ............................................6 The Kongsfjorden area ....... ..........97 Smeerenburgfjorden - Magdalene- INTRODUCTION ..... .. .... ....... ........ ....6 fjorden - Liefdefjorden................ 109 Woodfjorden - Bockfjorden........ 116 THE GEOLOGICAL EXPLORATION OF SVALBARD .... ........... ....... .......... ..9 NORTHEASTERN SPITSBERGEN AND NORDAUSTLANDET ........... 123 SVALBARD, PART OF THE Ny Friesland and Olav V Land .. .123 NORTHERN POLAR REGION ...... ... 11 Nordaustlandet and the neigh- bouring islands........................... 126 WHA T TOOK PLACE IN SVALBARD - WHEN? ....
    [Show full text]
  • Bathymetry and Deep-Water Exchange Across the Central Lomonosov Ridge at 88–891N
    ARTICLE IN PRESS Deep-Sea Research I 54 (2007) 1197–1208 www.elsevier.com/locate/dsri Bathymetry and deep-water exchange across the central Lomonosov Ridge at 88–891N Go¨ran Bjo¨rka,Ã, Martin Jakobssonb, Bert Rudelsc, James H. Swiftd, Leif Andersone, Dennis A. Darbyf, Jan Backmanb, Bernard Coakleyg, Peter Winsorh, Leonid Polyaki, Margo Edwardsj aGo¨teborg University, Earth Sciences Center, Box 460, SE-405 30 Go¨teborg, Sweden bDepartment of Geology and Geochemistry, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden cFinnish Institute for Marine Research, Helsinki, Finland dScripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA eDepartment of Chemistry, Go¨teborg University, Go¨teborg, Sweden fDepartment of Ocean, Earth, & Atmospheric Sciences, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, USA gDepartment of Geology and Geophysics, University of Alaska, Fairbanks, USA hPhysical Oceanography Department, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, MA, USA iByrd Polar Research Center, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA jHawaii Institute of Geophysics and Planetology, University of Hawaii, HI, USA Received 23 October 2006; received in revised form 9 May 2007; accepted 18 May 2007 Available online 2 June 2007 Abstract Seafloor mapping of the central Lomonosov Ridge using a multibeam echo-sounder during the Beringia/Healy–Oden Trans-Arctic Expedition (HOTRAX) 2005 shows that a channel across the ridge has a substantially shallower sill depth than the 2500 m indicated in present bathymetric maps. The multibeam survey along the ridge crest shows a maximum sill depth of about 1870 m. A previously hypothesized exchange of deep water from the Amundsen Basin to the Makarov Basin in this area is not confirmed.
    [Show full text]
  • Manuscript Necessary to Identify Individual Reflections and Structures Can Be Found at Dataverseno 955 (
    Early Cenozoic Eurekan strain partitioning and decoupling in central Spitsbergen, Svalbard Jean-Baptiste P. Koehl1,2,3,4 5 1Centre for Earth Evolution and Dynamics (CEED), University of Oslo, PO Box 1028 Blindern, N-0315 Oslo, Norway. 2Department of Geosciences, UiT The Arctic University of Norway in Tromsø, NO-9037 Tromsø, Norway. 3Research Centre for Arctic Petroleum Exploration (ARCEx), University of Tromsø, NO-9037 Tromsø, Norway. 4 CAGE – Centre for Arctic Gas Hydrate, Environment and Climate, NO-9037 Tromsø, Norway. 10 Correspondence: Jean-Baptiste P. Koehl ([email protected]) Abstract The present study of field, petrological, exploration well and seismic data describes backward- 15 dipping duplexes comprised of phyllitic coal and bedding-parallel décollements and thrusts localized along lithological transitions in tectonically thickened Lower–lowermost Upper Devonian, uppermost Devonian–Mississippian and uppermost Pennsylvanian–lowermost Permian sedimentary strata of the Wood Bay and/or Widje Bay and/or Grey Hoek formations, of the Billefjorden Group and of the Wordiekammen Formation respectively. The study shows that these 20 structures partially decoupled uppermost Devonian–Permian sedimentary rocks of the Billefjorden and Gipsdalen groups from Lower–lowermost Upper Devonian rocks of the Andrée Land Group and Mimerdalen Subgroup during early Cenozoic Eurekan deformation in central Spitsbergen. Eurekan strain decoupling along these structures explains differential deformation between Lower– lowermost Upper Devonian rocks
    [Show full text]
  • World Map Showing Surface and Subsurface Distribution, and Lithologic Character of Middle and Late Neoproterozoic Rocks
    World Map Showing Surface and Subsurface Distribution, and Lithologic Character of Middle and Late Neoproterozoic Rocks By John H. Stewart1 Open-File Report 2007-1087 2007 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey 1 Menlo Park, Calif. U.S. Department of the Interior DIRK KEMPTHORNE, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Mark D. Myers, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia 2007 Revised and reprinted: 2007 For product and ordering information: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS Suggested citation: Stewart, John H., 2007, World map showing surface and subsurface distribution, and lithologic character of Middle and Late Neoproterozoic rocks: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2007-1087. Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted material contained within this report. ii Contents Introduction......................................................................................................................... 3 Sources of information ........................................................................................................ 2 Africa [AF]
    [Show full text]
  • Age and Origin of the Lomonosov Ridge: a Key Continental Fragment in Arctic Ocean Reconstructions
    Geophysical Research Abstracts Vol. 17, EGU2015-10207-1, 2015 EGU General Assembly 2015 © Author(s) 2015. CC Attribution 3.0 License. Age and origin of the Lomonosov Ridge: a key continental fragment in Arctic Ocean reconstructions Christian Marcussen, Christian Knudsen, John R. Hopper, Thomas Funck, Jon R. Ineson, and Morten Bjerager Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland (GEUS), Copenhagen, Denmark The Lomonosov Ridge is a trans-oceanic seafloor high that separates the Eurasia Basin from the Amerasia Basin. It extends for a distance of almost 1800 km across the Arctic Ocean from the Lincoln Shelf off Greenland and Canada to the East Siberian Shelf. Although known from the ACEX drilling expedition to be a sliver of continental crust, it remains an enigmatic feature and many details of its history are unknown. In the summer of 2012, GEUS recovered dredge samples from two locations along the flank of the ridge facing the Eurasian Basin. The samples comprise 100 kg and 200 kg of rocks and rock pieces ranging in size from 0.1 to 80 kg which were recovered from two different scarps associated with rotated continental fault blocks. A significant quantity of rocks with identical structures and isotopic fingerprints show that they formed at the same time and from the same geological material. This combined with the broken and angular nature of many of the pieces recovered indicates that the material is from in situ bedrock and does not represent dropstones brought to the area by drifting ice. Two main sedimentary rock types were recovered - an arkosic metasedimentary rock, and a quartz rich non-metamorphic sandstone.
    [Show full text]
  • 9 Paleontological Conference Th
    Polish Academy of Sciences Institute of Paleobiology 9th Paleontological Conference Warszawa, 10–11 October 2008 Abstracts Warszawa Praha Bratislava Edited by Andrzej Pisera, Maria Aleksandra Bitner and Adam T. Halamski Honorary Committee Prof. Oldrich Fatka, Charles University of Prague, Prague Prof. Josef Michalík, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Bratislava Assoc. Prof. Jerzy Nawrocki, Polish Geological Institute, Warszawa Prof. Tadeusz Peryt, Polish Geological Institute, Warszawa Prof. Grzegorz Racki, Institute of Paleobiology, Warszawa Prof. Jerzy Trammer, University of Warsaw, Warszawa Prof. Alfred Uchman, Jagiellonian University, Kraków Martyna Wojciechowska, National Geographic Polska, Warszawa Organizing Committee Dr Maria Aleksandra Bitner (Secretary), Błażej Błażejewski, MSc, Prof. Andrzej Gaździcki, Dr Adam T. Halamski, Assoc. Prof. Anna Kozłowska, Assoc. Prof. Andrzej Pisera Sponsors Institute of Paleobiology, Warszawa Polish Geological Institute, Warszawa National Geographic Polska, Warszawa Precoptic Co., Warszawa Cover picture: Quenstedtoceras henrici Douvillé, 1912 Cover designed by Aleksandra Hołda−Michalska Copyright © Instytut Paleobiologii PAN Nakład 150 egz. Typesetting and Layout: Aleksandra Szmielew Warszawska Drukarnia Naukowa PAN ABSTRACTS Paleotemperature and paleodiet reconstruction on the base of oxygen and carbon isotopes from mammoth tusk dentine and horse teeth enamel during Late Paleolith and Mesolith MARTINA ÁBELOVÁ State Geological Institute of Dionýz Štúr, Mlynská dolina 1, SK−817 04 Bratislava 11, Slovak Republic; [email protected] The use of stable isotopes has proven to be one of the most effective methods in re− constructing paleoenvironments and paleodiet through the upper Pleistocene period (e.g. Fricke et al. 1998; Genoni et al. 1998; Bocherens 2003). This study demonstrates how isotopic data can be employed alongside other forms of evidence to inform on past at great time depths, making it especially relevant to the Palaeolithic where there is a wealth of material potentially available for study.
    [Show full text]
  • The Franklinian Geosyncline in the Canadian Arctic and Its Relationship to Svalbard
    The Franklinian Geosyncline in the Canadian Arctic and its relationship to Svalbard By R. L. CHRISTIE1 Contents P age Abstract 263 lntroduction . 264 The Franklinian Geosyncline . 265 General tectonic pattern . 265 Stratigraphy . 267 Tectonic events .................. .............................. 274 a) Late Precambrian orogeny ... ........... .... ...... ........ 274 b) Middle Ordovician or earlier orogeny ...................... .. 274 c) Late Silurian to Early Devonian orogeny ....... ... .............. 274 d) Midd le Devonian?, Acadian orogeny . 275 e) Latest Devonian to Ear!y Mississippian orogeny ................ 276 Structural features of the Innuitian orogen .......................... 276 The principal structures : Acadian - Ellesmerian ... ................. 277 Older structural zones . 278 Y o unger structures . 279 A review of some tectonic features of the Innuitian region . 280 Tectonic development of Svalbard and the Innuitian region ............ 284 Tectonic models to account for the Arctic Ocean basins and the geology of Svalbard . 284 The geology of Svalbard and the lnnuitian region . 287 Pre-Carboniferous time . 287 Carboniferous and later time . 295 Tectonic connections between Svalbard and Innuitia ...... .......... 295 A tectonic model for Svalbard and Innuitia .................... .... 297 The de Geer Line and other lineaments. 300 The geosynclinal concept and the model for Svalbard-Innuitia ........ 304 Conclusions . 309 References . 309 Abstract Development of the Franklinian Geosyncline began, perhaps ear!ier, but
    [Show full text]
  • Geographic Names
    Commentary THE FLOOR OF THE ARCTICOCEAN: GEOGRAPHIC NAMES M. A. Beall, F. Edvalson2, K. Hunkins3, A. Molloyl, and N. Ostenso4 HE NAMING OF OCEAN FLOOR features in the Arctic seems to have been done Twithout thought to standardization in geographic nomenclature. W. K. Lyon, Director of the Arctic Sciences and Technology Division of the US.Navy Electronics Laboratory, called a meeting of the authors of the present paper to arbitrate the naming of these features in the hope that it would help to stem the proliferation of new namesand to standardize the names of the major features. The decisions of the meeting which was held in San Diego on 10 and 11 January 1966 were based on the following criteria: 1. Consistency with the Undersea terms and definitions proposed by the Advisory Committee on Undersea Features to the U.S. Board on Geo- graphicNames (Washington, D.C.: 1964) andLimits of Oceans and Seas, InternationalHydrographic Bureau Special PublicationNo. 23 (Monte Carlo: 1953) 2. Common usage 3. Priority of discovery or naming 4. Association withestablished geographic features 5. Minimizing ambiguity Fifty-four major features were discussed. Table 1 lists the names considered, the final suggested name, the approximate location, and the status of the name with the U.S. Board on Geographic Names and the International Hydrographic Bureau. The final suggested names represent the majority decision of the authors but it should be noted that in certain cases there was not complete unanimity. For the most part, however, it it felt that the accepted names should raise little controversy. The authors will endeavour to use the final suggested namesin future publications, and it is hoped that other investigatorswill find them suitable for their use.
    [Show full text]
  • Redacted for Privacy Abstract Approved: John V
    AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF MIAH ALLAN BEAL for the Doctor of Philosophy (Name) (Degree) in Oceanography presented on August 12.1968 (Major) (Date) Title:Batymety and_Strictuof_thp..4rctic_Ocean Redacted for Privacy Abstract approved: John V. The history of the explordtion of the Central Arctic Ocean is reviewed.It has been only within the last 15 years that any signifi- cant number of depth-sounding data have been collected.The present study uses seven million echo soundings collected by U. S. Navy nuclear submarines along nearly 40, 000 km of track to construct, for the first time, a reasonably complete picture of the physiography of the basin of the Arctic Ocean.The use of nuclear submarines as under-ice survey ships is discussed. The physiography of the entire Arctic basin and of each of the major features in the basin are described, illustrated and named. The dominant ocean floor features are three mountain ranges, generally paralleling each other and the 40°E. 140°W. meridian. From the Pacific- side of the Arctic basin toward the Atlantic, they are: The Alpha Cordillera; The Lomonosov Ridge; andThe Nansen Cordillera. The Alpha Cordillera is the widest of the three mountain ranges. It abuts the continental slopes off the Canadian Archipelago and off Asia across more than550of longitude on each slope.Its minimum width of about 300 km is located midway between North America and Asia.In cross section, the Alpha Cordillera is a broad arch rising about two km, above the floor of the basin.The arch is marked by volcanoes and regions of "high fractured plateau, and by scarps500to 1000 meters high.The small number of data from seismology, heat flow, magnetics and gravity studies are reviewed.The Alpha Cordillera is interpreted to be an inactive mid-ocean ridge which has undergone some subsidence.
    [Show full text]
  • Quaternary Stratigraphy of the Northwind Ridge, Arctic Ocean
    Quaternary Stratigraphy of the Northwind Ridge, Arctic Ocean THESIS Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Kevin Allen Crawford B.S. Graduate Program in Geological Sciences The Ohio State University 2010 Master's Examination Committee: Peter-Noel Webb, Advisor Leonid Polyak Lawrence A. Krissek Copyright by Kevin A Crawford 2010 Abstract The Arctic Ocean plays an important role in modulating the world‘s climate. Changes in sea-ice albedo and the export of freshwater into the North Atlantic could have serious repercussions to the climate patterns far beyond the Arctic. To understand fully the impacts of the retreating sea-ice cover and the warming Arctic Ocean we need to look into the past for clues. Paleoenvironments of the Arctic Ocean can be reconstructed by using sea-floor sediment constituents, such as paleobiological and mineral components as well as chemical and paleomagnetic parameters. Three cores raised from the Northwind Ridge, north of the Alaskan continental margin, were chosen to investigate sedimentary patterns and related paleoenvironments in the western Arctic Ocean across a time frame from the Holocene to estimated early Pleistocene. These cores show a range of sedimentation rates decreasing from south to north, thus allowing a development of a relatively high-resolution Upper Quaternary stratigraphy at the southern part of the ridge and a lower-resolution, yet longer stratigraphy for its northern part. In addition to this long stratigraphic coverage, the northern core has well-preserved calcareous microfauna, which provides new insights into paleoceanographic environments.
    [Show full text]
  • On Thin Ice? (Mis)Interpreting Russian Policy in the High North Roderick Kefferpütz
    No. 205/February 2010 On Thin Ice? (Mis)interpreting Russian Policy in the High North Roderick Kefferpütz limate change in the Arctic is expected to make the ice cap dwindling to a record-low minimum extent the region a lot busier as new strategic of 4.3 million square km in September 2007.2 resources become available. The Russian C These developments open up an array of intractable Federation is a key player in this context, having put challenges, including threats to biodiversity and the forth a comprehensive Arctic strategy. Russian policy traditional way of life of autochthon communities in towards the so-called High North, however, is the Arctic region. Of particular danger to global oftentimes not seen in its entirety and has received a environmental stability, however, is the threat to low- plethora of criticism in the Western media and foreign lying coastal regions posed by rising sea levels. This policy community. This paper aims to contribute to a would not only have immense political, environmental better understanding of Russian actions in the High and social consequences; the economic effects would North by providing a succinct overview of Russian also be tremendous. According to Allianz financial policies in the region and identifying the fundamental services, a rise of half a metre by the middle of this rationale behind them. The paper concludes that century could put at risk more than 28 trillion dollars’ Russia’s Arctic policy is not only a lot more nuanced worth of assets in the world’s largest coastal cities.3 In but also not very different from the policies conducted addition, increasing temperatures in this volatile region by other riparian states.
    [Show full text]
  • Gchron-2019-16.Pdf
    https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-2019-16 Preprint. Discussion started: 7 November 2019 c Author(s) 2019. CC BY 4.0 License. A new 30,000 year chronology for rapidly deposited sediments on the Lomonosov Ridge using bulk radiocarbon dating and probabilistic stratigraphic alignment Francesco Muschitiello1, Matt O’Regan2, Jannik Martens3, Gabriel West2, Örjan Gustafsson3, Martin 5 Jakobsson2 1 Department of Geography, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EN, UK 2 Department of Geological Sciences, Stockholm University, Svante Arrhenius väg 8, SE 106 91, Sweden 3 Department of Environmental Science and Analytical Chemistry, Stockholm University, Svante Arrhenius väg 8, SE 106 91, Sweden 10 Correspondence to: Francesco Muschitiello ([email protected]) Abstract. We present a new marine chronostratigraphy from a high-accumulation rate Arctic Ocean core at the intersection of the Lomonosov Ridge and the Siberian margin, spanning the last ~30 kyr. The chronology was derived using a combination of bulk 14C dating and stratigraphic correlation to Greenland ice-core records. This was achieved by applying an appositely developed Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm for Bayesian probabilistic alignment of proxy records. The algorithm 15 simulates depositionally realistic alignments that are consistent with the available radiocarbon age estimates and allows deriving uncertainty bands associated with the inferred alignment. Current composite chronologies from this region are reasonably consistent with our age model during the Holocene and the latter part of deglaciation. However, prior to ~14 kyr BP they yield too old age estimates with offsets that linearly increase up to ~40 kyr near the onset of Marine Isotope Stage (MIS) 2.
    [Show full text]