Monona Terrace Teacher Guide
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
ABSTRACT the Main Feature of a Conventional Terraced Housing Development Is Rows of Rectangular Shaped Houses with the Narrow Fa
MAKING A RETURN ON INVESTMENT IN PASSIVE ARCHITECTURE TERRACED HOUSES DEVELOPMENT Wan Rahmah Mohd Zaki Universiti Teknologi Malaysia(UiTM) Malaysia E-mail: [email protected] Abdul Hadi Nawawi Universiti Teknologi MalaysiaQJiTM) Malaysia E-mail: [email protected] Sabarinah Sh Ahmad Universiti Teknologi MalaysiaQJiTM) Malaysia E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT The main feature of a conventional terraced housing development is rows of rectangular shaped houses with the narrow facade as the frontage. Consequently, this limits natural cross ventilation and daylight penetration into the middle of the houses; and cause for unnecessary energy consumption on mechanical cooling and artijicial lighting to make the living spaces comfortable for occupants. Such inconsideration is mainly attributed to the optimum configuration of houses which offers the most economic return desired by the developer. Passive Architecture (PA) design strategies can make terraced houses more conducive for occupants as well as gives reasonable returns to the developer. The idea is demonstrated on a hypothetical double storeys terraced scheme in a 2.5 acre site whereby it is transformed intofour types of PA terraced houses development. The Return on Invesfment of the PA terraced houses is ascertained for two situations, ie., (i) fwed sales price for all types of house; and (ii) added premium to PA terraced houses due to the positive unintended effects such as low density housing, etc. If critical criteria for demand and supply in housing remain constant, it is found that PA terraced housing development offers competitive returns to the developer relative to the returns for conventional terraced housing scheme. Keyworh: Orientation, Indoor Comfort and Operational Energy 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Housing and Energy The recent public awareness on sustainability calls for housing to not only serves as a basic shelter but also to be energy efficient, i.e., designed to make occupants need low operational energy. -
Proposed Terrace and Yard Plantings Ad-Hoc Committee
SASY Neighborhood Council Proposed Terrace and Yard Plantings Ad-Hoc Committee Purpose The purpose of this ad hoc committee is to research and analyze ordinances and practices related to terrace and yard plantings; report to the SASY Council as indicated; and work with SASY, city staff, and the SASY alderperson to update ordinances to better reflect SASY neighborhood and wider community values and expectations. Background A survey of 91 properties in the heart of the SASY neighborhood showed that the majority (69%) of terraces and front yards in the neighborhood are in violation of restrictive city of Madison ordinances which broadly prohibit many plantings in terraces and private front yards. For example, prohibited are anything but grass within two feet of the curb; plantings over two feet tall in terraces; plantings and fences over three feet high within a ten-foot triangle next to driveways in each front yard; any overhang of vegetation, including grass, over the sidewalk; erection of any permanent structure on terraces, including vegetable boxes; grass over eight inches tall, including ornamental grasses; bushes and trees on terraces that are not planted by the city; plantings in a triangle ten feet along a driveway and ten feet along the sidewalk in the private front yard of each house/apartment or building; and other requirements. The city inspects and cites property owners for violations of terrace and yard planting ordinances upon submission of a complaint. The only exception is for plantings and structures for the sole purpose of erosion control. The “violations” in the SASY neighborhood almost without exception appear to enhance rather than detract from the appearance of the property and neighborhood. -
Reciprocal Sites Membership Program
2015–2016 Frank Lloyd Wright National Reciprocal Sites Membership Program The Frank Lloyd Wright National Reciprocal Sites Program includes 30 historic sites across the United States. FLWR on your membership card indicates that you enjoy the National Reciprocal sites benefit. Benefits vary from site to site. Please check websites listed in this brochure for detailed information on each site. ALABAMA ARIZONA CALIFORNIA FLORIDA 1 Rosenbaum House 2 Taliesin West 3 Hollyhock House 4 Florida Southern College 601 RIVERVIEW DRIVE 12621 N. FRANK LLOYD WRIGHT BLVD BARNSDALL PARK 750 FRANK LLOYD WRIGHT WAY FLORENCE, AL 35630 SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85261-4430 4800 HOLLYWOOD BLVD LAKELAND, FL 33801 256.718.5050 480.860.2700 LOS ANGELES, CA 90027 863.680.4597 ROSENBAUMHOUSE.COM FRANKLLOYDWRIGHT.ORG 323.644.6269 FLSOUTHERN.EDU/FLW WRIGHTINALABAMA.COM FOR UP-TO-DATE INFORMATION BARNSDALL.ORG FOR UP-TO-DATE INFORMATION FOR UP-TO-DATE INFORMATION TOUR HOURS: 9AM–4PM FOR UP-TO-DATE INFORMATION TOUR HOURS: TOUR HOURS: BOOKSHOP HOURS: 8:30AM–6PM TOUR HOURS: THURS–SUN, 11AM–4PM OPEN ALL YEAR, EXCEPT OPEN ALL YEAR, EXCEPT TOUR TICKETS AVAILABLE AT THE THANKSGIVING, CHRISTMAS AND NEW Experience firsthand Frank Lloyd MAJOR HOLIDAYS. HOLLYHOCK HOUSE VISITOR’S CENTER YEAR’S DAY. 10AM–4PM Wright’s brilliant ability to integrate TUES–SAT, 10AM–4PM IN BARNSDALL PARK. VISITOR CENTER & GIFT SHOP HOURS: SUN, 1PM–4PM indoor and outdoor spaces at Taliesin Hollyhock House is Wright’s first 9:30AM–4:30PM West—Wright’s winter home, school The Rosenbaum House is the only Los Angeles project. Built between and studio from 1937-1959, located Discover the largest collection of Frank Lloyd Wright-designed 1919 and 1923, it represents his on 600 acres of dramatic desert. -
The Wright 3
Children's Book and Media Review Volume 27 Issue 3 Article 16 2006 The Wright 3 Gillian Streeter [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/cbmr BYU ScholarsArchive Citation Streeter, Gillian (2006) "The Wright 3," Children's Book and Media Review: Vol. 27 : Iss. 3 , Article 16. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/cbmr/vol27/iss3/16 This Book Review is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Children's Book and Media Review by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Streeter: The Wright 3 Balliett, Blue. The Wright 3. Illustrated by Brett Helquist. Scholastic, 2006. ISBN 0439693675. $16.99. 318 p. Reviewer: Gillian Streeter Reading Level: Intermediate, Young adult Rating: Outstanding Genre: Fiction; Detective and mystery stories; Subject: Wright, Frank Lloyd, 1867-1959--Juvenile fiction; Robie House (Chicago, Ill.)-- Juvenile fiction; Books--Reviews; Calder and Petra are back, along with Calder's collector friend Tommy, who has just moved back to Chicago after his thieving stepfather dies. Tommy and Calder's close friendship has changed since he left Chicago and all three are uncertain whether they can have a collective friendship. The latest art-related problem their teacher Miss Hussey brings to class: Frank Lloyd Wright's Robie House is in danger of being divided into fours pieces and shipped to several different museums by the University of Chicago. After creating a shaky alliance, Calder, Tommy, and Petra - the Wright Three - set out to save the Robie House from destruction with their own unique talents. -
Development of Improved Design Criteria for Low-Rise Buildings in Developing Countries to Better Resist the Effects of Extreme Winds
AlllDD TTEtD?! ~..,».o. BUILDING SCIENCE SERIES 56 fi™i?}™?*''°S * TECH R.I.C. f ""proved Design Criteria to Better Resistthe Effects of Extreme Winds for Low-Rise Buildings in Developing Countries U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE / National Bureau of Standards The Building Science Series ^Yo. I'he Building .Sciciico Series disseminates technical information developed at the National Bureau of Standards on liuilding materials, components, systems, and whole structures. The Series presents research results, test methods, and performance criteria related to the structural and environmental functions and the durability and safety char- ac^terisUcs of building elements and systems. These publications, similar in style and content to the NBS Building Materials and Structures Reports <1938-59), are directed toward the manufacturing, design, construction, and research segments of the building industry, standards organizations, and officials responsible for building codes. The material for this Series originates principally in the Center for Building Technology of the NBS Institute for Applied Technology. The publications are divided into three general groups: Building Systems and Processes; Health, Safety and Comfort; and Structures and Materials. For further information regarding these publications please contact the Scientific and Professional Liaison Section, Center for Building Technology, Institute for Ap- plied Technology. National Bureau of Standards, Washington, D.C. 20234. I See mailing list announcement on last page l NOV V 1374 Development of Improved Design Criteria for Low-Rise Buildings in Developing Countries to Better Resist the Effects of Extreme Winds Proceedings of a Workshop held at the Dr. Paulino J. Garcia Memorial Hall National Science Development Board Manila, Philippines November 14-17, 1973 Edited by Noel J. -
Underrepresented Communities Historic Resource Survey Report
City of Madison, Wisconsin Underrepresented Communities Historic Resource Survey Report By Jennifer L. Lehrke, AIA, NCARB, Rowan Davidson, Associate AIA and Robert Short, Associate AIA Legacy Architecture, Inc. 605 Erie Avenue, Suite 101 Sheboygan, Wisconsin 53081 and Jason Tish Archetype Historic Property Consultants 2714 Lafollette Avenue Madison, Wisconsin 53704 Project Sponsoring Agency City of Madison Department of Planning and Community and Economic Development 215 Martin Luther King, Jr. Boulevard Madison, Wisconsin 53703 2017-2020 Acknowledgments The activity that is the subject of this survey report has been financed with local funds from the City of Madison Department of Planning and Community and Economic Development. The contents and opinions contained in this report do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the city, nor does the mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation by the City of Madison. The authors would like to thank the following persons or organizations for their assistance in completing this project: City of Madison Richard B. Arnesen Satya Rhodes-Conway, Mayor Patrick W. Heck, Alder Heather Stouder, Planning Division Director Joy W. Huntington Bill Fruhling, AICP, Principal Planner Jason N. Ilstrup Heather Bailey, Preservation Planner Eli B. Judge Amy L. Scanlon, Former Preservation Planner Arvina Martin, Alder Oscar Mireles Marsha A. Rummel, Alder (former member) City of Madison Muriel Simms Landmarks Commission Christina Slattery Anna Andrzejewski, Chair May Choua Thao Richard B. Arnesen Sheri Carter, Alder (former member) Elizabeth Banks Sergio Gonzalez (former member) Katie Kaliszewski Ledell Zellers, Alder (former member) Arvina Martin, Alder David W.J. McLean Maurice D. Taylor Others Lon Hill (former member) Tanika Apaloo Stuart Levitan (former member) Andrea Arenas Marsha A. -
UCLA SCHOOL of PUBLIC AFFAIRS PATIO and TERRACE GUIDELINES for USE UCLA Policy #860.EV126
UCLA SCHOOL OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS PATIO AND TERRACE GUIDELINES FOR USE UCLA Policy #860.EV126 I) GENERAL Outdoor areas of the campus may be reserved for activities and programs in accordance with existing University policies, campus regulations, and specific restrictions applicable to each area. Any use of outdoor areas must not significantly interfere with Official University functions, or unreasonably disrupt the peace and quiet of the campus and the community adjacent to the campus. These guidelines for use apply to rooftop area known as the School of Public Affairs (Pub Aff) 3rd Floor Terrace and the Pub Aff Patio. The Pub Aff 3rd Floor Terrace and Patio are for the use of Pub Aff faculty, staff and students. II) ACTIVITIES All activities on the Patio and/or Terrace assume compliance with all UCLA activities and can include the following: • Breakfasts, Lunches, Dinners • Receptions • Picnics • Displays and Exhibits • Seminars and presentations III) MAXIMUM CAPACITY LIMITS A maximum capacity of 500 people will be allowed on the Terrace, 100 for the Patio. IV) SCHEDULING 1) Scheduled by School of Public Affairs (Pub Aff) External Programs and Operations staff. 2) Scheduled as a Pub Aff space; available to PUB AFF affiliates on a first come, first served basis. 3) All PUB AFF scheduling policies apply. V) AMPLIFIED SOUND 1) Activities generating amplified sound Monday through Friday, 8:00 am – 6:00 pm of any given academic quarter will not be scheduled on the Patio and/or Terrace. 2) All requests for amplified sound must be approved by UCLA Student Organization Leadership and Enrichment (SOLE). -
2019 – 2020 Frank Lloyd Wright National Reciprocal Sites Membership Program
2019 – 2020 FRANK LLOYD WRIGHT NATIONAL RECIPROCAL SITES MEMBERSHIP PROGRAM THE FRANK LLOYD WRIGHT NATIONAL RECIPROCAL SITES PROGRAM IS AN ALLIANCE OF FRANK LLOYD WRIGHT ORGANIZATIONS THAT OFFER RECIPROCAL BENEFITS TO PARTICIPATING MEMBERS. Frank Lloyd Wright sites and organizations listed here are independently For questions about the Frank Lloyd Wright National Reciprocal Sites owned, managed and operated. Reciprocal Members are advised to contact Membership Program please contact your institution’s membership sites prior to their visit for tour and site information. Phone numbers and department. Each site / organization may handle processing differently. websites are provided for your convenience. This icon indicates a 10% shop discount. You must present a membership card bearing the “FLWR” identifier to claim these benefits at reciprocal sites. 2019 – 2020 MEMBER BENEFITS ARIZONA THE ROOKERY 209 S LaSalle St Chicago, IL 60604 TALIESIN WEST lwright.org 312.994.4000 12345 N Taliesin Dr Scottsdale, AZ 85259 Beneits: Two complimentary tours franklloydwright.org 888.516.0811 Beneits: Two complimentary admissions to the 90-minute Insights tours. INDIANA Reservations recommended. THE JOHN AND CATHERINE CHRISTIAN HOUSE-SAMARA CALIFORNIA 1301 Woodland Ave West Lafayette, IN 47906 samara-house.org 765.409.5522 HOLLYHOCK HOUSE Beneits: One complimentary tour 4800 Hollywood Blvd Los Angeles, CA 90026 barnsdall.org IOWA Beneits: Two complimentary self-guided tours MARIN COUNTY CIVIC CENTER THE HISTORIC PARK INN HOTEL (CITY NATIONAL BANK AND 3501 -
Wright in Wisconsin
Wright in Wisconsin Walk in Frank Lloyd Wright's footsteps to discover the architect's inspiration for design and the foundation of a true legacy. Born and raised in Wisconsin, Wright rooted many of his design principals in the landscape of his surroundings. Join the Martin House travel team as we discover Wright's home state and many of his designs including: Taliesin, Wright's famed home, studio and school for many years; the Jacobs House, the S.C. Johnson building, Annunciation Church, the Unitarian Meeting House, and more! Participants will enjoy guided tours, a taste of local cuisine and motor coach transportation through Wisconsin's beautiful landscape. Please see below for more detailed information on the places we will be visiting in Wisconsin. The Fred B. Jones House | Penwern (1900-03) Lake Delavan, Wisconsin Designed as a summer home for Oak Park businessman Fred B. Jones, this estate consists of four structures: a main house, boathouse, gate lodge and stable, which were built on a 10-acre site with 600 feet of lakefront and a commanding view of Delavan Lake. Penwern is privately owned and open to the public only for special Frank Lloyd Wright-related events. The Annunciation Greek Orthodox Church (1956-61) Wauwatosa, Wisconsin Located in a suburb of Milwaukee, this church was one of Frank Lloyd Wright's last major commissions; construction was completed after the architect’s death. The basic design of the church is inspired by the architect’s reinterpretation of two traditional Byzantine forms: the Greek cross and the dome. American System-Built Homes (1915-17) Milwaukee, Wisconsin Throughout his career, Frank Lloyd Wright took special interest in designing beautiful yet affordable homes for moderate-to- low-income families. -
Patio/Terrace
DuPage County Department of Economic Development & Planning Regulatory Services Division t!ÇLhÇ9ww!/9 The following are guidelines and requirements to assist when installing a patio or terrace. This information is provided to identify minimal requirements in the County’s adopted Building Code and Zoning Ordinance. These guidelines are not all inclusive, but cover the most critical requirements involved in this type of project. Feel free to contact our department if you have further questions. Requirements to submit: (must be submitted in person) approximate review time – 8-15 business days Application - Type I Non-refundable application fee Plat of Survey Construction detail (for seat walls/retaining walls) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ The Type I application form shall be filled out completely. The owner’s name, address and phone number, site address if different, cost of proposed work, whether the property is on water/sewer or well/septic, patio square footage, contractor’s name and registration number (all contractors doing work in the unincorporated areas of DuPage County must be registered with our department prior to permit issuance), signature of owner. A non-refundable application fee will be required – this portion of the fee is credited toward the final permit fee (reference the Schedule of Fees for specifics), a Drainage Review fee and a Health fee if the property is on well and/or septic. If payment is by check a separate check will be necessary to pay the Health review fee portion. We accept exact cash, checks or Master Card and Visa. Provide 6 copies of the scalable Plat of Survey with the patio drawn to scale in the exact proposed location with dimensions and dimensions to the nearest lot lines. -
Zimmerman House Materials—Final List Binder 1
Zimmerman House Materials—Final List Binder 1—Labeled “Zimmerman House Through 1989” Photocopied articles from magazines and newspapers o Dates: from 1956-1989, bulk 1989 Binder 2—Labeled “Zimmerman House 1990” Photocopied and original articles from magazines and newspapers o Date: 1990 Binder 3—Labeled “Zimmerman House 1991” Photocopied and original articles from magazines and newspapers o Dates: 1991-1992, bulk 1991 Box 1—Labeled “Zimmerman House Archive—Deaccession? Files” Folder: Sotheby’s catalogue—Gagliano violin and sales slip Folder: Slides, photos, receipts, correspondence, appraisal for Gagliano violin and bow. o Date: 1989 Box 2—Labeled “Zimmerman House Archive—Vintage Publications on the Zimmerman House” “The Zimmerman House Historic Structure Report” (2 copies); also includes a press release (not attached) o Date: 1989 “A Classic Usonian: Frank Lloyd Wright’s 1950 House for Isadore J. and Lucille Zimmerman.” General information, labels. o Date: 1990 Folder: “Exhibition: A Classic Usonian: Label Copy.” Also an unattached article; label copy from exhibit appears to be the same as previous item. “Currier Grant Application for National Endowment for the Humanities for Training Zimmerman House Guides.” Also includes unattached correspondence, a docent bulletin, a memorandum, and a priorities evaluation. o Dates: 1990-1991, bulk 1990 Box 3—Labeled “Uncatalogued Materials” Newsclipping about Dr. Zimmerman o Date: undated 2 color photos of exterior of Zimmerman House with inscriptions from Zimmermans on back o Date: 1976 Black and white photo of exterior of Zimmerman House in winter o Date: undated 3 B & W photos of Lucille Zimmerman’s family o Date: undated Postcard with picture of S.C. -
3 Bedroom | Outdoor Patio (Gf) 158 Sq.Ft. | Outdoor Terrace (Roof) 230 Sq.Ft
Palm Palm 1319 SQ.FT. 1319 SQ.FT. 3 BEDROOM OUTDOOR PATIO (GF) 158 SQ.FT. OUTDOOR TERRACE (ROOF) 230 SQ.FT. 3 BEDROOM | OUTDOOR PATIO (GF)| 158 SQ.FT. | OUTDOOR TERRACE (ROOF) 230 SQ.FT.| Palm 1319 SQ.FT. PLANTER 3 BEDROOM | PLANTEROUTDOOR PATIO (GF) 158 SQ.FT. | OUTDOOR TERRACE (ROOF) 230 SQ.FT. PATIO CANOPY TOWNHOUSE ENTRY PRIVACY SCREEN PRIVACY SCREEN PATIO CANOPY PLANTER TOWNHOUSE ENTRY PRIVACY SCREEN PRIVACY SCREEN BEDROOM 2 BATH LIVING / DINING 8’10” X 11’5”(9’3”) PRINCIPAL BEDROOM TERRACE 10’3” X 13’3” 11’10” X 9’4” PATIO EXTENT OF SOLAR CANOPY PANEL ABOVE TOWNHOUSE HWT ENTRY TRELLIS ABOVE PRIVACY SCREEN PRIVACY SCREEN BEDROOM 2 BATH LIVING / DINING 8’10” X 11’5”(9’3”) W/D PRINCIPAL BEDROOM TERRACE 10’3” X 13’3” 11’10” X 9’4” UP UP UP PANTRY EXTENT OF SOLAR DN DN BEDROOM 2 BATH PANEL ABOVE TERRACE KITCHEN LIVING / DINING 8’10” X 11’5”(9’3”) PRINCIPAL BEDROOM MECHANICAL HWT 10’3” X 13’3” ENSUITE 11’10” X 9’4” ROOM TRELLIS ABOVE BEDROOM 3 DW 7’10” X 11’0” (8’11’) EXTENT OF SOLAR PANEL ABOVE HWT DN TRELLIS ABOVE F W/D GROUND FLOOR SECONDUP FLOOR THIRD FLOOR UP W/D ROOFTOP TERRACE UP PANTRY UP UP DN UP DN PANTRY Intake Shaft Landscape KITCHEN DN DN MECHANICAL 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ENSUITE ROOM KITCHEN N BEDROOM 3 MECHANICAL ENSUITE ROOM BEDROOM 3 12 11 10 9 8 DW 7’10” X 11’0” (8’11’) DW 7’10” X 11’0” (8’11’) Building ‘A’ Building ‘B’ DN DN F F 12 11 10 9 8 1 2 3 4 GROUND5 6 7 FLOOR SECOND FLOOR THIRD FLOOR ROOFTOP TERRACE Landscape Intake Shaft GROUND FLOOR SECOND FLOOR THIRD FLOOR ROOFTOP TERRACE Intake Shaft Landscape Intake 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Shaft NLandscape 12 11 10 9 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 N All areas and stated room dimensions are approximate.