The Human Faculty for Music: What’S Special About It?
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Bispham (2018) 0 The Human Faculty for Music: What’s special about it? John Christopher Bispham1,2 Wolfson College 1 Leverhulme Centre for Human Evolutionary Studies (LCHES) Division of Biological Anthropology Department of Archaeology and Anthropology 2 Centre for Music and Science (CMS) Faculty of Music University of Cambridge PhD Thesis Submitted 03/2018 Supervisor: Professor Ian Cross Abstract (short version) This thesis presents a model of a narrow faculty for music - qualities that are at once universally present and operational in music across cultures whilst also being specific to our species and to the domain of music. The comparative approach taken focuses on core psychological and physiological capabilities that root and enable appropriate engagement with music rather than on their observable physical correlates. Configurations of musical pulse; musical tone; and musical motivation are described as providing a sustained attentional structure for managing personal experience and interpersonal interaction and as offering a continually renewing phenomenological link between the immediate past, the perceptual present and future expectation. Constituent parts of the narrow faculty for music are considered most fundamentally as a potentiating, quasi- architectural framework in which our most central affective and socio-intentional drives are afforded extended time, stability, and a degree of abstraction, intensity, focus and meaning. The author contends, therefore, that music's defining characteristics, specific functionalities and/or situated efficacies are not demarcated in broadly termed “musical” qualities such as melodic contour or rhythm or in those surprisingly elusive “objective facts” of musical structure. Rather they are solely the attentional/motivational frameworks which root our faculty to make and make sense of music. Our generic capacities for culture and the manifold uses of action, gesture, and sound to express and induce emotion; to regulate affective states; to create or reflect meaning; to signify; to ritualize; coordinate; communicate; interrelate; embody; entrain; and/or intentionalize, none of these is assessed as being intrinsically unique to music performance. Music is, instead, viewed as an ordered expression of human experience, behaviour, interaction, and vitality, all shaped, shared, given significance, and/or transformed in time. The relevance of this model to topical debates on music and evolution is discussed and the author contends that the perspective offered affords significant implications for our understanding of why music is evidently and remarkably effective in certain settings and in the pursuit of certain social, individual, and therapeutic goals. Bispham (2018) 1 Formal Declarations 1) This dissertation is submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. 2) It is the result of my own work and includes nothing which is the outcome of work done in collaboration. 3) I further state that no substantial part of my dissertation has already been submitted, or, is being concurrently submitted for any degree, diploma or other qualification at the University of Cambridge or any other University or similar institution. 4) It does not substantially exceed the prescribed word limit of 80’000 words excluding the bibliography, cited references and appendices, for the Degree Committee for Archaeology and Anthropology, and is within limits specified by the examiners in their joint report (+/- 10%). Related Publications and Presentations Some of the ideas and arguments in this thesis have been, or are in the process of being, explored and/or advocated in the following media appearances, publications, and conference/seminar talks: Media Appearances: • Television Interview with Pascal Goblot (in preparation). Documentary Film on Prehistoric Music. ARTE TV, https://www.arte.tv/en/. Publications: Bispham, J.C. (in press). Music, Evolution and the Experience of Time. Invited Chapter Submission for ‘Oxford Handbook of Time in Music’ (Oxford University Press). Bispham, J.C. (in preparation). Music’s Evolutionary “Design Features”. To be submitted to Behavioural Brain Sciences (Cambridge University Press). Bispham, J.C. (2012). How musical is Man – An evolutionary perspective. Chapter in “Sound Musicianship: Understanding the Crafts of Music. - 1/7 Meaningful Music Making for Life”. Cambridge Scholars Publishing. Bispham, J. C. (2010). Modelisation de la musique - motivation, pulsation et tonalites musicales. In 'Musique et Evolution' Eds. Deliege, I., Vitouch, O. PSY Mardaga. Bispham. J.C. (2009) – Music’s “design features”: Musical motivation, musical pulse, and musical pitch. Musicae Scientiae, special issue: music and evolution. Cross, I., Bispham, J., Himberg, T. &Swaine, J. (unpublished) – Evolution and Musical Rhythm. Submitted to Evolutionary Anthropology. Bispham, J.C. (2007) – Music as socio-affective confluential communication? Response to 'a commentary on Bispham’ (2006). Music Perception, 25;2 Bispham. J.C. (2006) - Rhythm in Music: What is it? Who has it? And Why? Journal of Music Perception, special issue on rhythm perception and performance, 24;2, 125-134. Bispham, J.C. (2006) - Music means nothing if we don’t know what it means - lead review of ‘The Singing Neanderthals’ by S. Mithen. Journal of Human Evolution, 50, 587-593. Bispham, J.C. (2004) – Bridging the Gaps – Music as a Biocultural Phenonmenon. Commentary on ‘In time with the music: The concept of entrainment and its significance for ethnomusicology’ by Clayton, M., Sager, R., & Will, U. ESEM Counterpoint 1. Presentations Bispham, J. C. (2004) - Music and Evolution. Department of Biological Anthropology Seminar Series, University of Cambridge, UK. Bispham, J. C. (2005) - Rhythm in Music: What is it?, Who has it? And Why? Rhythm Perception and Performance Conference II, Ghent, BE. Bispham, J. C. (2005) - Evolution, Ethology and Entrainment. Poster Presentation at 'Music and Neuroscience Conference IV', Leipzig, DE. Bispham, J. C. (2005) - The Human Skill of Interpersonal Music al Entrainment. International Network of Musical Entrainment Studies Workshop I, Ohio State University, US. Bispham, J. C. (2006) - Evolution and Musical Rhythm. International Network of Musical Entrainment Studies Workshop II, Open University, Milton Keynes, UK Bispham, J. C. (2007) - Towards a model of musicality: Species-specificity, domain-specificity and universals. Leverhulme Centre for Human Evolutionary Studies Seminar Series, University of Cambridge, UK. Bispham, J. C. (2012) - Music's Evolutionary Design Features: Musical Pulse, Musical Tone and Musical Motivation. SEMPRE International Conference on Music , University of Western Australia, Perth, AUS. Bispham, J. C. (2016) - Time in Music: Pulse, Pitch and Attentional Architecture. International Conference on 'Time in Music', Faculty of Music, University of Oxford, UK. Bispham (2018) 2 Abstract (long version) INTRODUCTION The central question and rationales for this thesis are outlined. What is special about music? What is universally present in music across cultures whilst also being distinct from other forms of animal and human behaviour and communication? What constitutes a putative narrow faculty for music? The scope and challenge of this focal question is delineated by four clear statements all of which are in essence, if not in the details, uncontroversial: 1) Music is, within and across cultural boundaries, enormously and wonderfully diverse; 2) Most features we commonly regard as being essentially constitutive of “music” and “musicality” – e.g. pulse, rhythm, melody, gesture, vocal affect, performance, expressivity, movement, emotion regulation, synchronisation, harmony – are broadly speaking present in and integral to other forms of interaction and communication; 3) Music appears to share common substance across cultures in terms of certain consistencies in function, context, setting, and efficacy, as well as in being widely prized and experienced as being intensely meaningful; 4) The full capacity for music is manifest of a vast interconnected mosaic of skills and abilities ranging upwards from the most basic perceptual, vocal and motoric functions. I argue that, as something like music appears from our cultural vantage point to be recognisable as such across cultures, it is logically pursuant that some identifying features or distinct conglomerations of features are commonly present. A key point here is that these traits may not be physically or knowingly/descriptively evident but may reflect implicitly learned ontology and/or empathy with the underlying psychological mechanisms and experience. Finally I contend that understanding and asserting a theoretical model of a narrow faculty for music is an essential step towards understanding the emergence of music and musical capabilities during the course of hominin evolution as well as for interpreting its modern-day uses, functions and efficacies in social, individual and therapeutic settings. Thus, this thesis aims to contribute to an enhanced applicability of - and clarity in - the ever-growing body of interdisciplinary research into music. SECTION I – Music and Evolution Chapter 1 reviews and critiques the current state of research into the evolution of music focusing on debates regarding the status of music as an evolutionary adaptation, putative rationales for the emergence of musical capabilities, universals in music, cross-cultural concerns, and theoretical issues concerning cross-species comparative perspectives.