DOCSLIB.ORG

Attitudes on Populism a Comparative Enquiry Across Countries and Parties

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Attitudes on Populism a Comparative Enquiry Across Countries and Parties Attitudes on populism A comparative enquiry across countries and parties IRENE ESTEBAN Universitá degli Studi di Milano and Universidad Autónoma de Madrid CONTENTS List of Tables and Figures iv Acknowledgments vii Abstract x Introducción x Introduction xiv THEORETICAL SECTION Chapter 1. A conceptual and theoretical examination of the study of populism page 2 1.1 Defining the concepts 3 1.1.1 Populism 4 1.1.2 Political cynicism 15 1.1.3 Stealth democracy 15 1.1.4 Political disaffection 18 1.1.5 Authoritarianism 22 1.1.6 External efficacy 27 1.2 Defining the relationships between concepts 28 1.2.1 How are these concepts related to attitudes? 34 1.3 References 38 Chapter 2. The operationalisation of populist attitudes 44 2.1 Concept validity 45 2.2 Definitions in the different studies measuring populist attitudes 46 2.3 Dimensions of populism in attitudinal studies 48 2.4 Measurement validity 52 2.5 Operationalisation and indicators of the construct 53 2.6 Validity assessment of the measured construct 58 2.7 References EMPIRICAL SECTION Chapter 3. Two of a kind? People centrism and anti-establishment compared 64 3.1 Introduction 66 3.2 Theory and hypotheses 67 3.2.1 Populist definition and the measurement of populist attitudes 67 3.2.2 Explanations of populist attitudes 68 3.2.3 Cynic ideology, similarities and differences between cynicism and populism 69 3.2.4 Predictors of attitudes on people centrism and anti-establishment attitudes 71 3.2.5 Hypotheses 73 3.3 Data and methods 73 3.3.1 The case of Belgium 73 3.3.2 Dataset 74 3.3.3 Indicators 75 3.3.4 Statistical modelling 76 3.4 Analyses 76 3.4.1 Dimensionality of people centrism and anti-establishment attitudes 76 3.4.2 Explanatory models 79 3.4.3 People centrism and anti-establishment at the regional level: the impact on vote choice 83 ii 3.5 Concluding remarks 91 3.6 References 92 Chapter 4. Same problems, different solutions. Stealth democracy and the vote for a populist party 95 4.1 Introduction 96 4.2 Theory and hypotheses 97 4.2.1 Populist voters and stealth democrats: antagonising contemporary democratic processes 98 4.2.2 Where populist voters and stealth democrats diverge: legitimacy and solutions 99 4.2.3 Expectations: Procedural preferences as a three-sided relationship 101 4.3 Data and methods 102 4.4 Analyses 107 4.5 Concluding remarks 110 4.6 References 112 Chapter 5. Two kinds of Populism, two kinds of voters? Italy and its many Populisms 115 5.1 Introduction 116 5.2 Theory and hypotheses 117 5.2.1 The Italian political landscape between 2013 and 2018 117 5.2.2 The Lega 121 5.2.3 Movimento Cinque Stelle 123 5.2.4 The differences in populist parties 127 5.2.5 The importance of ideology: The left- right divide in the Lega and M5S 129 5.2.6 Hypotheses 132 5.3 Data and methods 133 5.3.1 Exploratory analyses 134 5.3.2 Multinomial analyses 137 5.4 Analyses 140 5.5 Concluding remarks 147 5.6 References 149 Chapter 6. The two Iberian exceptions: Explaining the absence of right-wing populist parties in Spain and Portugal 152 6.1 Introduction 153 6.2 Theory and hypotheses 154 6.2.1 The grounds for a populist radical right: a European perspective 154 6.2.2 Why has it taken so long for right-wing populist supply to appear? 164 6.2.2.1 Explanations for the Spanish case 165 6.2.2.2 Explanations for the Portuguese case 167 6.3 Data and methods 168 6.3.1 Are populist right-wing voters represented in Spain and Portugal? The ability of the mainstream right to attract populist voters 174 6.4 Analyses 178 6.4.1 Was the mainstream right successfully attracting right-wing voters? 178 6.5 Concluding remarks 184 6.6 References 186 CONCLUDING REMARKS 191 OBSERVACIONES FINALES 197 Appendix 203 iii LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES TABLES 2.1 Overview of definition and dimensions of populism in different studies page 51 2.2 Most used indicators to measure populist attitudes 54 2.3 Methodological aspects from papers measuring populist attitudes 60 3.1 Fit indexes of CFA models 77 3.2 Regression on people centrism and anti-establishment attitudes in Belgium 80 4.1 Fit indexes of CFA models in Belgium 105 5.1 Vote in Italy in 2018 and vote in 2013 118 5.2 Refuse to place themselves in left-right axis 132 5.3 Results of factor analysis for populism and nativism 135 5.4 Result of factor loadings for populism and nativism 135 6.1. Self-placement of European countries in the extreme-right positions of ideological scales, 2016 (in percentages) 163 iv FIGURES 1.1. Overlap of populism and other political attitudes 29 2.1. From theoretical concept to observed variable 46 3.1. Results of the CFA for attitude dimensions 78 3.2. People centrism and probability to vote for a party in Flanders (I) 84 3.3. People centrism and probability to vote for a party in Flanders (II) 85 3.4. Anti-establishment and probability to vote for a party in Flanders (I) 86 3.5. Anti-establishment and probability to vote for a party in Flanders (II) 87 3.6. People centrism and probability to vote for a party in Wallonia (I) 88 3.7. People centrism and probability to vote for a party in Wallonia (II) 89 3.8. Anti-establishment and probability to vote for a party in Wallonia (I) 90 3.9. Anti-establishment and probability to vote for a party in Wallonia (II) 90 4.1. CFA Model of criticism of contemporary representation and stealth attitudes 105 4.2. Average marginal effects on the vote for the populist party 108 4.3 Average marginal effect of criticism at different levels of stealth democracy 109 5.1. Aggregate volatility in Italy from 1948 to 2018 119 5.2. Left-right general placement of the Italian parties (2014) 125 5.3. Orientation of the party leadership towards European Integration (2014) 126 5.4. Anti-elite salience of the Italian parties (2014) 127 5.5. Vote in 2018 and left-right self placement 131 5.6. Populist attitudes and vote for M5S, PD, FI and Lega in 2018 136 5.7. Nativist attitudes and vote for M5S, PD, FI and Lega in 2018 137 v 5.8. Average Marginal effects of the multinomial model for Movimento Cinque Stelle 141 5.9. Average Marginal effects of the multinomial model for Lega 142 5.10. Results of Model 5 for Partito Democratico and Forza Italia 146 6.1. Satisfaction with government in European countries, 2002-2014 156 6.2. Satisfaction with democracy in European countries, 2002-2014 157 6.3. Feelings about household income nowadays in European countries, 2002-2014 160 6.4. Immigrants make worse / better place to live in European countries, 2002-2014) 161 6.5. Attitudes towards immigration in some countries and parties in Europe, 2016 170 6.6. Attitudes on political trust in some countries and parties in Europe, 2016 171 6.7. Attitudes on conservation values in some countries and parties in Europe, 2016 172 6.8. Attitudes toward European integration values in some countries and parties in Europe, 2016 173 6.9. Voters’ self-placements in ideological scales and parties in Portugal, 2016 175 6.10. Voters’ self-placements in ideological scales and parties in Spain, 2016 176 6.11. How are voters with right-wing populist attitudes represented in Spain, 2004-2016? (logistic regressions) 180 6.12. How are voters with right wing populist attitudes represented in Portugal, 2004-2016? (logistic regressions) 182 7.1. Conceptual map of the conclusions of the thesis 194 vi ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The last four years dedicated to this PhD have been an emotional and professional challenge, and have taught me many things about myself and the world of academic research. There have been plenty of moments of joy – also of frustration, and all of them have contributed to my personal and professional growth. Along the way, I have shared this journey with many inspiring and supportive people, and this dissertation would be incomplete without expressing my gratitude to all of them. First of all, I thank my supervisor, Prof. Dr. Paolo Segatti for accepting to guide me during this dissertation, and for helping me to conduct research on a topic that is as complex as interesting. Paolo has generously provided me with everything a PhD student needs: plenty of valuable advice, support, and sharp critique to always aim to make my work better. He has not only shared his deep knowledge of the topic, but challenged me in every step to make me aware of the conceptual, theoretical, and methodological shortcomings of my research. Furthermore, he has always been supportive, even when he did not agree with my premises. I am very grateful that you agreed to be my supervisor, Paolo, and that you have pushed and supported me always when I needed it. Ti ringrazio sinceramente. Special words of gratitude also go to my co-supervisor, Prof. Emeritus Dr. José Ramón Montero. José Ramón started mentoring me long before my PhD journey started, and he always knew how to put me at ease with my own struggles, and showed me to focus on what is important. José Ramón, you always have had a listening ear; when I was doubtful you believed in me. Your dedication is inspiring and your encouragement unparalleled.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Lega Nord and Anti-Immigrationism: the Importance of Hegemony Critique for Social Media Analysis and Protest
    International Journal of Communication 12(2018), 3553–3579 1932–8036/20180005 Lega Nord and Anti-Immigrationism: The Importance of Hegemony Critique for Social Media Analysis and Protest CINZIA PADOVANI1 Southern Illinois University Carbondale, USA In this study, I implement Antonio Gramsci’s hegemony critique to analyze the anti- immigration rhetoric promoted by the Italian ultraright party Lega Nord [Northern League]. Specifically, this case study focuses on the discourse that developed on the microblogging site Twitter during the Stop Invasione [Stop Invasion] rally, organized by Matteo Salvini’s party on October 18, 2014, in Milan. I argue that hegemony critique is helpful to investigate political discourse on social media and to theorize the struggle surrounding contentious topics such as immigration. The method, which is multilayered and includes content analysis and interpretative analysis, allows for the exploration of a considerable data corpus but also an in-depth reading of each tweet. The result is a nuanced understanding of the anti-immigration discourse and of the discourse that developed in favor of immigration and in support of a countermarch, which progressive movements organized in response to Lega’s mobilization on the same day in Milan. Keywords: Lega Nord, ultraright media, far-right media, anti-immigrationism, Twitter, critical social media analysis, mobilization, Gramsci, hegemony critique The rise of ultraright movements in Western Europe and the United States is an indication of the continuous crisis of capitalism and neoliberal ideologies. The financial and economic downturn that plagued Europe and North America beginning in late 2008 and the consequent Brussels-imposed austerity in the European Union have exacerbated the rift between the haves and the have-nots.
    [Show full text]
  • Salvini Al Cap, Rixi: “Cambiamo Sede Solo Se Ce Lo Chiede Il Circolo”. Stasera Il Direttivo Di Katia Bonchi, Jenny Sanguineti 26 Aprile 2017 – 12:36
    1 Salvini al Cap, Rixi: “Cambiamo sede solo se ce lo chiede il circolo”. Stasera il direttivo di Katia Bonchi, Jenny Sanguineti 26 Aprile 2017 – 12:36 Genova. “E’ il Cap che comanda, se non ce lo chiedono loro, noi non ci spostiamo. E’ un convegno sul lavoro, mica possiamo farlo al Bristol, sarebbe anche un’offesa nei confronti dei lavoratori in un momento di crisi come questo”. Edoardo Rixi, assessore regionale allo Sviluppo economico, risponde così alle polemiche esplose in questi giorni dopo che il Cap ha deliberato l’ospitalità per domenica al convegno ‘Riprendiamoci il lavoro’ che avrà fra i partecipanti anche il segretario della Lega Nord Matteo Salvini. “Come se io chiedessi al Cap di non ospitare lo Zapata perché è dell’autorità portuale, non mi viene manco in mente di farlo”, sbotta Rixi. Ma il problema in parte sta proprio nella proprietà della palazzina di via Albertazzi, che è oggi di una srl formata dallo stesso circolo (che detiene il pacchetto di maggioranza) e dell’autorità portuale. La società è tra quelle per cui la stessa Ap ha deciso la dismissione delle quote. La soluzione quindi sarebbe il ritorno della palazzina nel patrimonio dell’autorità portuale in cambio dell’usufrutto da parte del circolo Cap. Ma questa soluzione, durante tutto il periodo del governo di Luigi Merlo, non è stata mai formalizzata e oggi al governo del porto c’è il centrodestra con Paolo Signorini. Genova24.it - 1 / 2 - 26.09.2021 2 Nella decisione del direttivo del Cap di concedere lo spazio alla Lega Nord (che fra l’altro farà anche una donazione al circolo) questa situazione di incertezza ha indubbiamente influito.
    [Show full text]
  • Populism Vs. Anti-Elite Rhetoric
    Populism vs. Anti-elite rhetoric. A comparison based on expert survey results. Nina Wiesehomeier (IE School of International Relations – IE University) Using the new 2014 Chapel Hill Expert Survey wave, in a recent publication Polak et al. (2017) find that the salience of anti-elite rhetoric is a function of party ideology. Although the authors are careful to not equate anti-elite salience with populism, they nevertheless underscore that anti-establishment rhetoric is a core element of populist parties. This research note contrasts their measure with a more full-fledged measure of populism based on the ideational approach (Hawkins and Rovira Kaltwasser forthcoming) and reports findings for an expert survey of 165 political parties and 18 presidents in 18 Latin American countries. The results for this region of the world are quite similar to those reported for European countries, as anti-elite rhetoric appears to be primarily a function of party ideology. While the ideational approach emerges as orthogonal to the general left-right dimension, relying on anti-elite rhetoric as a proxy for populism runs the risk of confusing ideology with populism, something researchers should be wary about when using this measure as a stand in for populism. Prepared for presentation at AECPA 2017. Very preliminary draft. Please do not cite without the author’s permission. 1 INTRODUCTION Recent discussions on conceptualization appear to coalesce around definitions of populism as a set of ideas and a discourse, facilitating empirical measurement and thus such comparative studies. Populism as a set of ideas emphasizes the antagonistic, Manichean nature of populism, “a discourse which sees politics as divided in moral terms” (Hawkins and Silva 2015: 3).
    [Show full text]
  • ESS9 Appendix A3 Political Parties Ed
    APPENDIX A3 POLITICAL PARTIES, ESS9 - 2018 ed. 3.0 Austria 2 Belgium 4 Bulgaria 7 Croatia 8 Cyprus 10 Czechia 12 Denmark 14 Estonia 15 Finland 17 France 19 Germany 20 Hungary 21 Iceland 23 Ireland 25 Italy 26 Latvia 28 Lithuania 31 Montenegro 34 Netherlands 36 Norway 38 Poland 40 Portugal 44 Serbia 47 Slovakia 52 Slovenia 53 Spain 54 Sweden 57 Switzerland 58 United Kingdom 61 Version Notes, ESS9 Appendix A3 POLITICAL PARTIES ESS9 edition 3.0 (published 10.12.20): Changes from previous edition: Additional countries: Denmark, Iceland. ESS9 edition 2.0 (published 15.06.20): Changes from previous edition: Additional countries: Croatia, Latvia, Lithuania, Montenegro, Portugal, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden. Austria 1. Political parties Language used in data file: German Year of last election: 2017 Official party names, English 1. Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs (SPÖ) - Social Democratic Party of Austria - 26.9 % names/translation, and size in last 2. Österreichische Volkspartei (ÖVP) - Austrian People's Party - 31.5 % election: 3. Freiheitliche Partei Österreichs (FPÖ) - Freedom Party of Austria - 26.0 % 4. Liste Peter Pilz (PILZ) - PILZ - 4.4 % 5. Die Grünen – Die Grüne Alternative (Grüne) - The Greens – The Green Alternative - 3.8 % 6. Kommunistische Partei Österreichs (KPÖ) - Communist Party of Austria - 0.8 % 7. NEOS – Das Neue Österreich und Liberales Forum (NEOS) - NEOS – The New Austria and Liberal Forum - 5.3 % 8. G!LT - Verein zur Förderung der Offenen Demokratie (GILT) - My Vote Counts! - 1.0 % Description of political parties listed 1. The Social Democratic Party (Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs, or SPÖ) is a social above democratic/center-left political party that was founded in 1888 as the Social Democratic Worker's Party (Sozialdemokratische Arbeiterpartei, or SDAP), when Victor Adler managed to unite the various opposing factions.
    [Show full text]
  • State of Populism in Europe
    2018 State of Populism in Europe The past few years have seen a surge in the public support of populist, Eurosceptical and radical parties throughout almost the entire European Union. In several countries, their popularity matches or even exceeds the level of public support of the centre-left. Even though the centre-left parties, think tanks and researchers are aware of this challenge, there is still more OF POPULISM IN EUROPE – 2018 STATE that could be done in this fi eld. There is occasional research on individual populist parties in some countries, but there is no regular overview – updated every year – how the popularity of populist parties changes in the EU Member States, where new parties appear and old ones disappear. That is the reason why FEPS and Policy Solutions have launched this series of yearbooks, entitled “State of Populism in Europe”. *** FEPS is the fi rst progressive political foundation established at the European level. Created in 2007 and co-fi nanced by the European Parliament, it aims at establishing an intellectual crossroad between social democracy and the European project. Policy Solutions is a progressive political research institute based in Budapest. Among the pre-eminent areas of its research are the investigation of how the quality of democracy evolves, the analysis of factors driving populism, and election research. Contributors : Tamás BOROS, Maria FREITAS, Gergely LAKI, Ernst STETTER STATE OF POPULISM Tamás BOROS IN EUROPE Maria FREITAS • This book is edited by FEPS with the fi nancial support of the European
    [Show full text]
  • LEGHISTI BRAVA GENTE Prefazione Di Pier Luigi Bersani
    Khalid Chaouki LEGHISTI BRAVA GENTE Prefazione di Pier Luigi Bersani www.stranieriinitalia.it Biografia Khalid Chaouki, 30 anni, giornalista professionista, è responsabile Nuovi Ita- liani per il Partito Demo- cratico e candidato alla Camera dei Deputati nella circoscrizione Campania 2 alle elezioni del 24 e 25 febbraio 2013. Nato a Casablanca e cre- sciuto in Italia ha colla- borato con AnsaMed, il Corriere del Mezzogiorno, La Repubblica, Reset, il Riformista, Al Jazeera e Stranieri in Italia. Autore di “Salaam Italia”, è stato membro del- la Consulta per l’Islam italiano istituita presso il Viminale e responsabile Seconde Generazioni dei Giovani Democratici. Tiene conferenze in convegni e seminari di forma- zione sui temi dell’educazione interculturale, poli- tiche di convivenza e dialogo interreligioso. Blog: www.khalidchaouki.it Twitter: @KhalidChaouki3 Facebook: khalid.chaouki Stranieri in Italia • Editore Stranieri in Italia editore è la voce dell’immigrazione, il principale canale di informazione, approfondimento e dialogo dedicato ai nuovi cittadini. Attraverso la sua rete multimediale raggiunge ogni mese oltre un milione e mezzo di lettori. Un pubblico che non trova risposte e non si riconosce nei media tradizionali, ma chiede di approfondire tematiche chiave della sua vita quotidiana, preferibilmente nella sua lingua d’ori- gine. Stranieri in Italia pubblica www.stranieriinitalia.it, in italiano, con news, inchieste, analisi, normativa, guide e consulenze gratuite online. Attraverso tredici portali in lingua raggiunge online
    [Show full text]
  • Equivocal Euroscepticism: How Some Radical Right Parties Play Between ‘Reform’ and ‘Rejection’ Lines
    Equivocal Euroscepticism: How some radical right parties play between ‘reform’ and ‘rejection’ lines Reinhard Heinisch, Duncan McDonnell and Annika Werner University of Salzburg and Griffith University, Brisbane Paper prepared for the EUSA Conference, Miami 4-6 May 2017 FIRST DRAFT – PLEASE DO NOT CITE WITHOUT PERMISSION While the main Western European radical right parties have all espoused Eurosceptic positions since the turn of the twenty-first century, their Euroscepticism has come in varying degrees of ‘hard’ and ‘soft’ opposition at different moments in time (Taggart and Sczcerbiak 2008). As Mudde (2007) noted in the middle of the 2000-2010 decade, few radical right parties were openly ‘Eurorejectionist’ and advocated that their countries should leave the EU. Instead, as he put it, ‘the majority of populist radical right parties believe in the basic tenets of European integration, but are sceptical about the current direction of the EU’ (Mudde 2007, 164). Although highly critical of Brussels bureaucracy and the idea of ‘ever greater Union’, these parties were largely what we could call ‘Euro-reformist’ rather than ‘Euro-rejectionist’. This has changed however over the past decade. Most notably, if we take the principal radical right party group in the European Parliament, Europe of Nations and Freedom (ENF), we find that two members – the French National Front (FN) and the Dutch Party for Freedom (PVV) – now present an unequivocal ‘rejection’ stance and call for their countries to withdraw from the EU. At the same time, the FN and PVV’s three main partners, the Flemish Vlaams Belang (VB), the Austrian Freedom Party (FPÖ) and the Italian Northern League (LN) have never explicitly advocated withdrawal.
    [Show full text]
  • Technocratic Attitudes Among Citizens in Nine European Democracies
    People Haven’t Had Enough of Experts: Technocratic Attitudes among Citizens in Nine European Democracies Short title: People Haven’t Had Enough of Experts Keywords: technocracy, attitudes, experts, elitism, political representation, populism, factor analysis, latent class analysis Eri Bertsou [email protected] Department of Political Science (H356) University of Zurich Affolternstrasse 56 8050, Zurich Switzerland Daniele Caramani [email protected] Department of Political Science (H344) University of Zurich Affolternstrasse 56 8050, Zurich Switzerland Research for this article has been supported by the Department of Political Science, University of Zurich. For comments on earlier versions of the article, we are grateful to Malu Gatto, Lukas Leemann, Marco Steenbergen, Lukas Stoetzer, Andrej Zaslove as well as to the journal’s anonymous reviewers. People Haven’t Had Enough of Experts: Technocratic Attitudes among Citizens in Nine European Democracies Abstract Political representation theory postulates that technocracy and populism mount a twofold challenge to party democracy, while also standing at odds with each other in the vision of representation they advocate. Can these relationships be observed empirically at the level of citizen preferences and what does this mean for alternative forms of representation? The article investigates technocratic attitudes among citizens following three dimensions – Expertise, Elitism, Anti-politics – and, using latent class analysis, identifies citizen groups that follow a technocratic, populist and party-democratic profile in nine European democracies. Results show that technocratic attitudes are pervasive and can be meaningfully distinguished from populist attitudes, though important overlaps remain. We investigate differences in demographics and political attitudes among citizen profiles that are relevant to political behaviour and conclude by highlighting the role that citizens’ increasing demands for expertise play in driving preferences for alternative types of governance.
    [Show full text]
  • Culture, Values and Social Basis of Northern Italian Centrifugal Regionalism
    Culture, Values and Social Basis of Northern Italian Centrifugal Regionalism. A Contextual Political Analysis of the Lega Nord Roberto Biorcio, Tommaso Vitale To cite this version: Roberto Biorcio, Tommaso Vitale. Culture, Values and Social Basis of Northern Italian Centrifugal Regionalism. A Contextual Political Analysis of the Lega Nord. Contemporary Centrifugal Region- alism: Comparing Flanders and Northern Italy, Royal Flemish Academy of Belgium for Science and the Arts Press, pp.171-199, 2011. hal-01044408 HAL Id: hal-01044408 https://hal-sciencespo.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01044408 Submitted on 23 Jul 2014 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. CULTURE, VALUES AND THE SOCIAL BASIS OF NORTHERN ITALIAN CENTRIFUGAL REGIONALISM. A CONTEXTUAL POLITICAL ANALYSIS OF THE LEGA NORD Roberto Biorcio (*) and Tommaso Vitale (°) (*) Università di Milano – Bicocca, Dipartimento di sociologia e ricerca sociale (°) Centre d’études européennes, Science Po, Paris 1. INTRODUCTION In the last twenty years, the issue of the autonomy of the northern regions has always been on the Italian political agenda, even if with ups and downs. The traditional “Southern Question” has been supplanted in the public debate by the so-called “Northern Question”.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of Contemporary European Research Euroscepticism Between
    Journal of Contemporary European Research Volume 17, Issue 2 (2021) Research Article Euroscepticism between Populism and Technocracy: The Case of Italian Lega and Movimento 5 Stelle Franco Zappettini and Marzia Maccaferri Citation Zappettini, F. and Maccaferri, M. (2021). ‘Euroscepticism between Populism and Technocracy: The Case of Italian Lega and Movimento 5 Stelle’ in, Journal of Contemporary European Research 17 (2): 239-257. https://doi.org/10.30950/jcer.v17i2.1184 First published at: www.jcer.net Volume 17, Issue 2 (2021) Franco Zappettini and Marzia Maccaferri Abstract This paper analyses the digital communication of Italian parties Lega and Movimento 5 Stelle during their campaigns for the European Parliament elections (January-May 2019). We focus on the Italian case as it is representative of a generalised shift in European public discourse towards an overt delegitimation of the European project and its re-imagination. In the Italian case, Lega and Movimento 5 Stelle, which were in a Government coalition for fourteen months, have been instrumental in Italy’s shift from a strong Europhile country to one of the most Eurosceptic. However, while Lega has definitely aligned itself with a strong right-wing populist agenda, Movimento 5 Stelle has promoted a populist technocratic vision of democracy. Our analysis shows that the articulation of Eurosceptic discourses from both parties by and large reflects the two stances above with Lega’s messages (primarily produced by its leader Matteo Salvini) characterised by a ‘hyperled’ style of communication and stronger nativist elements (for example the appeal to an ethno-centric and ‘sovereign’ idea of Italy) than those of Movimento 5 Stelle, which instead relied on a ‘horizontal’ communicative style.
    [Show full text]
  • Personality and Anti-Establishment Communication Bakker, Bert N.1
    Running head: THE POPULIST APPEAL 1 The Populist Appeal: Personality and Anti-establishment Communication Bakker, Bert N.1, Schumacher, G.2, and Rooduijn, M. 3 1Bert N. Bakker Amsterdam School of Communication Research University of Amsterdam, 1000 NG the Netherlands Email: [email protected] ORCID: 0000-0002-6491-5045 2Gijs Schumacher Department of Political Science University of Amsterdam, 1000 NG the Netherlands Email: [email protected] ORCID: 0000-0002-6503-4514 3Matthijs Rooduijn Department of Political Science University of Amsterdam, 1000 NG the Netherlands Email: [email protected] Paper forthcoming in the Journal of Politics THE POPULIST APPEAL 2 Abstract With the election of Donald Trump and landmark wins for populists across Europe, one of today’s most pressing questions is: why do people support populists?1 We theorize that citizens who score low on the personality trait Agreeableness – those who are more distrusting, cynical and tough-minded – are more susceptible to anti-establishment messages expressed by populists. Using thirteen population-based cross-sectional samples collected in eight countries and three continents, we first show that individuals who score low on Agreeableness are more likely to support populists. Moreover, with a conjoint experiment, we demonstrate that it is their anti-establishment message, which makes populists attractive to people who score low on Agreeableness. As such, this paper outlines a broader theoretical framework that links personality to political persuasion. In a time when politicians tailor their messages to the psychological make-up of their voters, it is crucial to understand the interplay between political communication and personality.
    [Show full text]
  • Measuring Populism Worldwide Faculty Research Working Paper Series
    Measuring Populism Worldwide Faculty Research Working Paper Series Pippa Norris Harvard Kennedy School February 2020 RWP20-002 Visit the HKS Faculty Research Working Paper Series at: https://www.hks.harvard.edu/research-insights/publications?f%5B0%5D=publication_types%3A121 The views expressed in the HKS Faculty Research Working Paper Series are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect those of the John F. Kennedy School of Government or of Harvard University. Faculty Research Working Papers have not undergone formal review and approval. Such papers are included in this series to elicit feedback and to encourage debate on important public policy challenges. Copyright belongs to the author(s). Papers may be downloaded for personal use only. www.hks.harvard.edu Measuring Populism Worldwide: Norris 1/8/20 8:50 PM Measuring Populism Worldwide Pippa Norris McGuire Lecturer in Comparative Politics John F. Kennedy School of Government Harvard University Cambridge, MA 02138 [email protected] www.pippanorris.com @PippaN15 www.GlobalPartySurvey.org Data: https://dataverse.harvard.edu/dataverse/GlobalPartySurvey. Synopsis: Populism studies have rapidly burgeoned but nevertheless systematic cross-national evidence about this phenomenon has lagged far behind. How can populism be measured in ways which are consistent, valid, and reliable? To address this issue, Part I outlines the minimalist concept of populism used in the study. Part II summarizes the pros and cons of previous attempts at gauging and classifying party ideological values and issue positions in general, as well as recent studies seeking to classify populists as a distinct party family. Part III describes the research design employed to construct the Global Party Survey, replicating the methods of previous expert surveys but expanding coverage worldwide and including innovative measures of populist rhetoric.
    [Show full text]