Characterization of the Regulation of CD46 Alternative Splicing

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Characterization of the Regulation of CD46 Alternative Splicing This document is downloaded from DR‑NTU (https://dr.ntu.edu.sg) Nanyang Technological University, Singapore. Characterization of the regulation of CD46 alternative splicing Tang, Sze Jing 2016 Tang, S. J. (2016). Characterization of the regulation of CD46 alternative splicing. Doctoral thesis, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore. https://hdl.handle.net/10356/65984 https://doi.org/10.32657/10356/65984 Downloaded on 29 Sep 2021 15:37:19 SGT CHARACTERIZATION OF THE REGULATION OF CD46 ALTERNATIVE SPLICING TANG SZE JING SCHOOL OF BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES 2016 CHARACTERIZATION OF THE REGULATION OF CD46 ALTERNATIVE SPLICING TANG SZE JING School of Biological Sciences A thesis submitted to the Nanyang Technological University in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy 2016 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First of all, I would like to express my sincere gratitude to my supervisor, Dr. Xavier Roca, for his constant guidance and patience throughout the course of my project. I am thankful to School of Biological Sciences, Nanyang Technological University for the advance core facilities and financial support. I am also sincerely appreciated my Thesis Advisory Committee, Professor Alex Law and Dr. Eugene Makeyev, for their valuable suggestions on my project. I would like to thank Dr. Karen Yap Lin Choo and Fursham Hamid for their help in one of the experiments. I would also like to thank Heidi Berger for her help in maintaining Jurkat T cells. I am indebted to all my present and past lab members especially Luo Shufang and Dr. Liu Jun for their help and guidance throughout these four years. I am grateful to my friends for their support and accompanying. Last but not least, I would like to dedicate this thesis to my family who always support me. P a g e | 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ................................................................................. 1 LIST OF FIGURES ............................................................................................. 7 LIST OF TABLES .............................................................................................. 9 ABBREVIATIONS ............................................................................................10 ABSTRACT .......................................................................................................16 1. INTRODUCTION ..........................................................................................17 1.1 Splicing .....................................................................................................17 1.1.1 Exon definition ...................................................................................19 1.2 Alternative splicing ...................................................................................21 1.2.1 Types of alternative splicing ...............................................................21 1.2.2 Regulation of alternative splicing ........................................................22 1.2.2.1 Splice-site strength ................................................................ 22 1.2.2.2 Cis-acting elements and trans-acting factors .......................... 25 1.2.2.2.1 SR proteins ................................................................ 30 1.2.2.2.2 SRSF1 ....................................................................... 30 1.2.2.3 Transcription and chromatin .................................................. 32 1.2.2.4 RNA secondary structure ....................................................... 33 1.2.3 Alternative splicing and NMD ............................................................33 1.2.4 Alternative splicing and diseases .........................................................35 1.3 The complement system ............................................................................38 1.4 Adaptive immune system ..........................................................................41 1.4.1 B cells.................................................................................................41 P a g e | 3 1.4.2 T cells .................................................................................................43 1.5 CD46 ........................................................................................................47 1.5.1 Gene structure .....................................................................................47 1.5.2 CD46 Function ...................................................................................49 1.5.2.1 Role in complement regulation .............................................. 49 1.5.2.2 CD46 and fertilization ........................................................... 49 1.5.2.3 Role of CD46 in epithelial cells ............................................. 49 1.5.2.4 Role of CD46 on B cells ........................................................ 50 1.5.2.5 CD46 in T-cell regulation ...................................................... 51 1.5.3 Implications in diseases ......................................................................54 1.5.4 Alternative splicing of CD46 ..............................................................57 1.6 Alternative splicing in immune responses ..................................................58 1.7 Objective ...................................................................................................60 2. MATERIALS AND METHODS ....................................................................61 2.1 Cell culture................................................................................................61 2.2 Plasmids ....................................................................................................61 2.2.1 Minigene construction ........................................................................61 2.2.2 Generation of mutant minigenes .........................................................63 2.2.3 Heterologous minigene .......................................................................70 2.2.3.1 pSXN plasmid ....................................................................... 70 2.2.3.2 CD46 exon 13 in Universal Minigene Vector (UMV) ............ 71 2.2.4 Overexpression plasmid ......................................................................72 P a g e | 4 2.3 Bacterial transformation and plasmid extraction ........................................73 2.4 Transfection ..............................................................................................74 2.4.1 Adherent cells .....................................................................................74 2.4.1.1 Transfection with minigenes .................................................. 74 2.4.1.2 siRNA and antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs) transfection ... 74 2.4.2 Suspension cells ..................................................................................77 2.4.2.1 Transfection with minigenes .................................................. 77 2.4.2.2 siRNA and antisense oligonucleotides (ASO) transfection ..... 77 2.5 Jurkat E6.1 cell activation .........................................................................77 2.6 RNA extraction and DNase I treatment .....................................................78 2.7 Reverse transcription (RT)-PCR and gel electrophoresis ...........................78 2.8 Semi-quantitative (Semi-Q) PCR...............................................................80 2.9 Analysis of CD46 alternative splicing patterns in human tissues ................80 2.10 Western blot ............................................................................................80 2.10.1 Sample preparation ...........................................................................80 2.10.2 SDS-PAGE and transfer ....................................................................81 2.10.3 Detection ..........................................................................................81 2.11 RNA pull-down .......................................................................................82 2.12 Silver staining .........................................................................................83 2.13 Flow cytometry .......................................................................................83 2.13.1 Cell sorting .......................................................................................83 2.13.2 Cell analysis .....................................................................................83 P a g e | 5 2.14 Inhibition of NMD ..................................................................................83 2.15 Preparation of HeLa nuclear extract .........................................................84 3. RESULTS ......................................................................................................85 3.1 Alternative splicing of CD46 is tissue selective .........................................85 3.2 The 5'ss flanking exons 7 and 8 are recognized by U1 using asymmetric loop register ............................................................................................................88 3.3 Multiple cis-acting elements regulate the alternative splicing pattern of exon 13....................................................................................................................96 3.3.1 Exon 13 is rich in ESEs and ESSs .......................................................96 3.3.2 The intronic sequences near exon 13 have less regulatory effect ....... 102 3.3.3 Validation of cis-acting elements by point mutations
Recommended publications
  • By Map44 Pathway Activation in a Manner Inhibitable Pattern
    Co-Complexes of MASP-1 and MASP-2 Associated with the Soluble Pattern-Recognition Molecules Drive Lectin Pathway Activation in a Manner Inhibitable This information is current as by MAp44 of September 28, 2021. Søren E. Degn, Lisbeth Jensen, Tomasz Olszowski, Jens C. Jensenius and Steffen Thiel J Immunol 2013; 191:1334-1345; Prepublished online 19 June 2013; Downloaded from doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1300780 http://www.jimmunol.org/content/191/3/1334 http://www.jimmunol.org/ Supplementary http://www.jimmunol.org/content/suppl/2013/06/19/jimmunol.130078 Material 0.DC1 References This article cites 43 articles, 23 of which you can access for free at: http://www.jimmunol.org/content/191/3/1334.full#ref-list-1 Why The JI? Submit online. by guest on September 28, 2021 • Rapid Reviews! 30 days* from submission to initial decision • No Triage! Every submission reviewed by practicing scientists • Fast Publication! 4 weeks from acceptance to publication *average Subscription Information about subscribing to The Journal of Immunology is online at: http://jimmunol.org/subscription Permissions Submit copyright permission requests at: http://www.aai.org/About/Publications/JI/copyright.html Email Alerts Receive free email-alerts when new articles cite this article. Sign up at: http://jimmunol.org/alerts The Journal of Immunology is published twice each month by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc., 1451 Rockville Pike, Suite 650, Rockville, MD 20852 Copyright © 2013 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved. Print ISSN: 0022-1767 Online ISSN: 1550-6606. The Journal of Immunology Co-Complexes of MASP-1 and MASP-2 Associated with the Soluble Pattern-Recognition Molecules Drive Lectin Pathway Activation in a Manner Inhibitable by MAp44 Søren E.
    [Show full text]
  • C1q Binding to Surface-Bound Igg Is Stabilized by C1r2s2 Proteases
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.02.08.430229; this version posted February 10, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. C1q binding to surface-bound IgG is stabilized by C1r2s2 proteases Seline A. Zwarthoff1, Kevin Widmer2, Annemarie Kuipers1, Jürgen Strasser3, Maartje Ruyken1, Piet C. Aerts1, Carla J.C. de Haas1, Deniz Ugurlar4, Gestur Vidarsson5, Jos A. G. Van Strijp1, Piet Gros4, Paul W.H.I. Parren6,7, Kok P.M. van Kessel1, Johannes Preiner3, Frank J. Beurskens8, Janine Schuurman8, Daniel Ricklin2, Suzan H.M. Rooijakkers1 1Medical Microbiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands; 2Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland; 3University of Applied Sciences Upper Austria, 4020 Linz, Austria; 4Crystal and Structural Chemistry, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands; 5Experimental Immunohematology, Sanquin Research, Amsterdam, The Netherlands 6Immunohematology and Blood Transfusion, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands. 7Lava Therapeutics, Utrecht, The Netherlands 8Genmab, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Running title: C1r2s2 enhance stability of C1q-IgG bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.02.08.430229; this version posted February 10, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Abstract Complement is an important effector mechanism for antibody-mediated clearance of infections and tumor cells. Upon binding to target cells, the antibody's constant (Fc) domain recruits complement component C1 to initiate a proteolytic cascade that generates lytic pores and stimulates phagocytosis.
    [Show full text]
  • Complement in Cancer: Untangling an Intricate Relationship
    REVIEWS Complement in cancer: untangling an intricate relationship Edimara S. Reis1*, Dimitrios C. Mastellos2*, Daniel Ricklin3, Alberto Mantovani4 and John D. Lambris1 Abstract | In tumour immunology, complement has traditionally been considered as an adjunctive component that enhances the cytolytic effects of antibody-based immunotherapies, such as rituximab. Remarkably, research in the past decade has uncovered novel molecular mechanisms linking imbalanced complement activation in the tumour microenvironment with inflammation and suppression of antitumour immune responses. These findings have prompted new interest in manipulating the complement system for cancer therapy. This Review summarizes our current understanding of complement-mediated effector functions in the tumour microenvironment, focusing on how complement activation can act as a negative or positive regulator of tumorigenesis. It also offers insight into clinical aspects, including the feasibility of using complement biomarkers for cancer diagnosis and the use of complement inhibitors during cancer treatment. An enormous body of data produced by converging indicated, however, that this versatile innate immune disciplines has provided unprecedented insight into the effector system mediates key homeostatic functions in intricate and dynamic relationship that exists between processes ranging from early vertebrate development developing tumours and the host immune system1–3. and tissue morphogenesis to tissue regeneration, cen­ It is widely accepted that neoplastic transformation
    [Show full text]
  • Complement Nomenclature—Deconvoluted
    UC Irvine UC Irvine Previously Published Works Title Complement Nomenclature-Deconvoluted. Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4gm4j3vg Authors Bohlson, Suzanne S Garred, Peter Kemper, Claudia et al. Publication Date 2019 DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2019.01308 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California PERSPECTIVE published: 07 June 2019 doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.01308 Complement Nomenclature—Deconvoluted Suzanne S. Bohlson 1, Peter Garred 2, Claudia Kemper 3 and Andrea J. Tenner 4* 1 Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Des Moines University, Des Moines, IA, United States, 2 Laboratory of Molecular Medicine, Department of Clinical Immunology, Rigshospitalet University Hospital of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark, 3 Laboratory of Molecular Immunology and the Immunology Center, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD, United States, 4 Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Department of Neurobiology and Behavior, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States In 2014, specific recommendations for complement nomenclature were presented by the complement field. There remained some unresolved designations and new areas of ambiguity, and here we propose solutions to resolve these remaining issues. To enable rapid understanding of the intricate complement system and facilitate therapeutic development and application, a uniform nomenclature for cleavage fragments,
    [Show full text]
  • Datasheet: MCA2603 Product Details
    Datasheet: MCA2603 Description: MOUSE ANTI HUMAN C1q Specificity: C1q Other names: COMPLEMENT COMPONENT 1q Format: Purified Product Type: Monoclonal Antibody Clone: 3R9/2 Isotype: IgG1 Quantity: 0.1 ml Product Details Applications This product has been reported to work in the following applications. This information is derived from testing within our laboratories, peer-reviewed publications or personal communications from the originators. Please refer to references indicated for further information. For general protocol recommendations, please visit www.bio-rad-antibodies.com/protocols. Yes No Not Determined Suggested Dilution Flow Cytometry Immunohistology - Frozen 1:500 - 1:1000 ELISA Western Blotting Immunofluorescence Where this product has not been tested for use in a particular technique this does not necessarily exclude its use in such procedures. Suggested working dilutions are given as a guide only. It is recommended that the user titrates the product for use in their own system using appropriate negative/positive controls. Target Species Human Product Form Purified IgG - liquid Preparation Purified IgG prepared by affinity chromatography on Protein A Buffer Solution Borate buffered saline Preservative 0.09% Sodium Azide (NaN ) Stabilisers 3 Approx. Protein 1.0 mg/ml Concentrations Immunogen Globular head domain of C1q, purified from human plasma. External Database Links UniProt: P02745 Related reagents Page 1 of 3 P02746 Related reagents P02747 Related reagents Entrez Gene: 712 C1QA Related reagents 713 C1QB Related reagents 714 C1QC Related reagents Synonyms C1QG Specificity Mouse anti human C1q antibody, clone 3R9/2, recognizes human complement component 1 q (C1q), a ~156 kDa secreted protein. C1q associates with proenzymes C1r and C1s to form the calcium-dependent C1 complex, the first component of the serum complement system.
    [Show full text]
  • A Novel C1q Domain Containing Protein in Black Rockfish (Sebastes
    Fish and Shellfish Immunology 87 (2019) 73–81 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Fish and Shellfish Immunology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/fsi Full length article A novel C1q domain containing protein in black rockfish (Sebastes schlegelii) serves as a pattern recognition receptor with immunoregulatory properties T and possesses binding activity to heat-aggregated IgG ∗ Xue Dua,b, Guang-hua Wanga, Bin Yuea, Jing-jing Wanga, Qin-qin Gua, Shun Zhoua, Min Zhanga, , ∗∗ Yong-hua Hub,c,d, a Marine Science and Engineering College, Qingdao Agricultural University, Qingdao, 266109, China b Institute of Tropical Bioscience and Biotechnology, Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences, Haikou, 571101, China c Laboratory for Marine Biology and Biotechnology, Qingdao National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology, Qingdao, China d Hainan Provincial Key Laboratory for Functional Components Research and Utilization of Marine Bio-resources, Haikou, 571101, China ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: C1q-domain-containing (C1qDC) proteins, which are involved in a series of immune responses, are important C1q-domain-containing protein pattern recognition receptors in innate immunity in vertebrates and invertebrates. Functional studies of C1qDC Sebastes schlegelii proteins in vertebrates are scarce. In the present study, a C1qDC protein (SsC1qDC) from the teleost black Immune defense rockfish (Sebastes schlegelii) was identified and examined at expression and functional levels. The open reading Pattern recognition receptor frame of SsC1qDC is 636 bp, and the predicted amino acid sequence of SsC1qDC shares 62%–69% overall Antibacterial activity identity with the C1qDC proteins of several fish species. SsC1qDC possesses conserved C1qDC features, including a signal sequence and a C1q domain.
    [Show full text]
  • (CR1, CD35) Is a Receptor for C1q
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Elsevier - Publisher Connector Immunity, Vol. 7, 345±355, September, 1997, Copyright 1997 by Cell Press Complement Receptor Type 1 (CR1, CD35) Is a Receptor for C1q Lloyd B. Klickstein,*² Sergei F. Barbashov,³ of C1 is tightly regulated by the C1 inhibitor, which cova- ³ § Tun Liu, k Richard M. Jack, lently binds to the activated enzymatic subunits of C1, and Anne Nicholson-Weller*³ C1r, and C1s and removes them from C1q. C1q, still *Department of Medicine bound to its immune complex or activating substance Harvard Medical School via its globular domains, is now free to interact with ² The Division of Rheumatology/Immunology cells bearing receptors for its collagen-like domain. The Department of Medicine collagen-like domain, or collagen tail, is what remains Brigham and Women's Hospital of the C1q molecule after the six globular domains are ³ Charles A. Dana Research Institute digested away by pepsin (Reid, 1976). The collagen tail Harvard-Thorndike Laboratory consists of the six ªstemsº of C1q, which come together Division of Infectious Disease in the amino half of the constituent chains to form a Beth Israel-Deaconess Medical Center single ªstalk.º Boston, Massachusetts 02215 Receptors for aggregated or insolubilized C1q were § La Jolla Pharmaceutical first recognized on lymphocytes (Dickler et al., 1972). San Diego, California 92121 Subsequent studies identified monocytes, some PMN, and B lymphocytes as the predominant C1q binding cell types in the peripheral blood (Tenner et al., 1981a). The molecular definition of the C1q receptor(s) has been Summary difficult, which may be explained in part by different methods used to define different receptors on different Molecular definition of the cellular receptor for the cell types.
    [Show full text]
  • Complement Nomenclature—Deconvoluted
    Complement Nomenclature Deconvoluted Bohlson, Suzanne S; Garred, Peter; Kemper, Claudia; Tenner, Andrea J Published in: Frontiers in Immunology DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.01308 Publication date: 2019 Document version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Document license: CC BY Citation for published version (APA): Bohlson, S. S., Garred, P., Kemper, C., & Tenner, A. J. (2019). Complement Nomenclature: Deconvoluted. Frontiers in Immunology, 10, [1308]. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2019.01308 Download date: 01. Oct. 2021 PERSPECTIVE published: 07 June 2019 doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.01308 Complement Nomenclature—Deconvoluted Suzanne S. Bohlson 1, Peter Garred 2, Claudia Kemper 3 and Andrea J. Tenner 4* 1 Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Des Moines University, Des Moines, IA, United States, 2 Laboratory of Molecular Medicine, Department of Clinical Immunology, Rigshospitalet University Hospital of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark, 3 Laboratory of Molecular Immunology and the Immunology Center, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD, United States, 4 Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Department of Neurobiology and Behavior, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States In 2014, specific recommendations for complement nomenclature were presented by the complement field. There remained some unresolved designations and new areas of ambiguity, and here we propose solutions to resolve these remaining issues. To enable rapid understanding of the intricate complement system and facilitate therapeutic development and application, a uniform nomenclature for cleavage fragments, pattern recognition molecules (PRMs) and enzymes of the lectin pathway and regulatory proteins of the complement system are proposed, and a standardization of language to designate different activation states of complement components is recommended.
    [Show full text]
  • Complement System and Potential Therapeutics in Age-Related Macular Degeneration
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences Review Complement System and Potential Therapeutics in Age-Related Macular Degeneration Young Gun Park 1, Yong Soo Park 2 and In-Beom Kim 2,3,4,* 1 Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 06591, Korea; [email protected] 2 Department of Anatomy, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 06591, Korea; [email protected] 3 Catholic Neuroscience Institute, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 06591, Korea 4 Catholic Institute for Applied Anatomy, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 06591, Korea * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +82-2-2258-7263 Abstract: Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is a complex multifactorial disease characterized in its late form by neovascularization (wet type) or geographic atrophy of the retinal pigment epithelium cell layer (dry type). The complement system is an intrinsic component of innate immunity. There has been growing evidence that the complement system plays an integral role in maintaining immune surveillance and homeostasis in AMD. Based on the association between the genotypes of complement variants and AMD occurrence and the presence of complement in drusen from AMD patients, the complement system has become a therapeutic target for AMD. However, the mechanism of complement disease propagation in AMD has not been fully understood. This concise review focuses on an overall understanding of the role of the complement system in AMD and its ongoing clinical trials. It provides further insights into a strategy for the treatment of AMD targeting the complement system.
    [Show full text]
  • 040501 Complement — First of Two Parts
    The New England Journal of Medicine Review Articles Advances in Immunology TABLE 1. THE THREE MAIN PHYSIOLOGIC ACTIVITIES OF THE COMPLEMENT SYSTEM. I AN R. MACKAY, M.D., AND FRED S. ROSEN, M.D., Editors ACTIVITY COMPLEMENT PROTEIN RESPONSIBLE FOR ACTIVITY Host defense against infection COMPLEMENT Opsonization Covalently bound fragments of C3 and C4 Chemotaxis and activation Anaphylatoxins (C5a, C3a, and C4a); ana- of leukocytes phylatoxin receptors on leukocytes First of Two Parts Lysis of bacteria and cells Membrane-attack complex (C5b–C9) Interface between innate MARK J. WALPORT, PH.D., F.R.C.P. and adaptive immunity Augmentation of antibody C3b and C4b bound to immune complexes responses and to antigen; C3 receptors on B cells and antigen-presenting cells OMPLEMENT is part of the innate immune Enhancement of immuno- C3b and C4b bound to immune complexes system and underlies one of the main effec- logic memory and to antigen; C3 receptors on follicular dendritic cells tor mechanisms of antibody-mediated immu- C Disposal of waste nity. It has three overarching physiologic activities Clearance of immune com- C1q; covalently bound fragments of C3 (Table 1): defending against pyogenic bacterial infec- plexes from tissues and C4 tion, bridging innate and adaptive immunity, and Clearance of apoptotic cells C1q; covalently bound fragments of C3 disposing of immune complexes and the products of and C4 inflammatory injury. In this review, each of these ac- tivities will be placed in a clinical context. Complement was first identified as a heat-labile principle in serum that “complemented” antibodies in the killing of bacteria. We now know that complement is a system of more than 30 proteins in plasma and on multiple names.
    [Show full text]
  • An Ultrahigh-Affinity Complement C4b-Specific Nanobody Inhibits in Vivo
    Published August 7, 2020, doi:10.4049/jimmunol.2000528 The Journal of Immunology An Ultrahigh-Affinity Complement C4b-Specific Nanobody Inhibits In Vivo Assembly of the Classical Pathway Proconvertase Alessandra Zarantonello,* Jessy Presumey,† Le´a Simoni,† Esra Yalcin,† Rachel Fox,‡ Annette Hansen,x Heidi Gytz Olesen,* Steffen Thiel,x Matthew B. Johnson,‡,{ Beth Stevens,‡,{,‖,# Nick Stub Laursen,* Michael C. Carroll,†,** and Gregers R. Andersen* The classical and lectin pathways of the complement system are important for the elimination of pathogens and apoptotic cells and stimulation of the adaptive immune system. Upon activation of these pathways, complement component C4 is proteolytically cleaved, and the major product C4b is deposited on the activator, enabling assembly of a C3 convertase and downstream alternative pathway amplification. Although excessive activation of the lectin and classical pathways contributes to multiple autoimmune and inflammatory diseases and overexpression of a C4 isoform has recently been linked to schizophrenia, a C4 inhibitor and structural characterization of the convertase formed by C4b is lacking. In this study, we present the nanobody hC4Nb8 that binds with picomolar affinity to human C4b and potently inhibits in vitro complement C3 deposition through the classical and lectin pathways in human serum and in mouse serum. The crystal structure of the C4b:hC4Nb8 complex and a three- dimensional reconstruction of the C4bC2 proconvertase obtained by electron microscopy together rationalize how hC4Nb8 prevents proconvertase assembly through recognition of a neoepitope exposed in C4b and reveals a unique C2 conformation compared with the alternative pathway proconvertase. On human induced pluripotent stem cell–derived neurons, the nanobody prevents C3 deposition through the classical pathway.
    [Show full text]
  • Bone As a Target for the Complement System
    Ulm University Institute of Orthopaedic Research and Biomechanics Director: Prof. Dr. med. vet. Anita Ignatius Bone as a Target for the Complement System Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree in Human Biology (Dr. biol. hum.) from the Medical Faculty, Ulm University Philipp Schoengraf Born in Cologne Ulm 2011 Dean: Prof. Dr. Thomas Wirth 1st reviewer: Prof. Dr. med. vet. Anita Ignatius 2nd reviewer: Prof. Dr. med. Hubert Schrezenmeier Day of defense: 4th May 2012 How blest in whom the fond desire From error’s sea to rise, hope still renews! What a man knows not he to use requires And what he knows, he cannot use for good. Johann Wolfgang von Goethe Faust, The First Part Of The Tragedy, lines 727-730 Table of Contents 1. Introduction ......................................................................................................... 1 1.1. Bone and Bone Cells ....................................................................................... 1 1.1.1. Mesenchymal Stem Cells ............................................................................. 2 1.1.2. Osteoblasts .................................................................................................. 4 1.1.3. Osteoclasts ................................................................................................... 4 1.1.4. Mutual Regulation of Osteoblasts and Osteoclasts ...................................... 6 1.2. Interactions of Bone and the Immune System ................................................. 7 1.3. The Complement System as a Key Part of the
    [Show full text]