DOCSLIB.ORG

Understanding the Snake River Basin Adjudication

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Understanding the Snake River Basin Adjudication UNDERSTANDING THE SNAKE RIVER BASIN ADJUDICATION ANN Y. VONDE, CHRISTOPHER M. BROMLEY, MEGHAN M. CARTER, ANDREA L. COURTNEY, SUSAN E. HAMLIN NYGARD, HARRIET A. HENSLEY, SHASTA J. KILMINSTER- HADLEY, MICHAEL C. ORR, DAVID I. STANISH, AND CLIVE J. STRONG FULL CITATION: Ann Y. Vonde et al., Understanding the Snake River Basin Adjudication, 52 IDAHO L. REV. 53 (2016). This article Copyright © 2016 Idaho Law Review. Except as otherwise expressly provided, permission is hereby granted to photocopy this article for classroom use, provided that: (1) Copies are distributed at or below cost; (2) The author of the article and the Idaho Law Review are properly identified; (3) Proper notice of the copyright is affixed to each copy; and (4) Notice of the use is given to the Idaho Law Review. UNDERSTANDING THE SNAKE RIVER BASIN ADJUDICATION ANN Y. VONDE, CHRISTOPHER M. BROMLEY, MEGHAN M. CARTER, ANDREA L. COURTNEY,SUSAN E. HAMLIN NYGARD, HARRIET A. HENSLEY, SHASTA J. KILMINSTER-HADLEY, MICHAEL C. ORR, DAVID I. STANISH, AND CLIVE J. STRONG* TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................... 55 II. SRBA COMMENCEMENT .......................................................................... 59 A. Authorizing the Adjudication Through Legislation ............................. 59 B. Commencing the Adjudication with the District Court ........................ 60 C. Commencing the Adjudication Under the McCarran Amendment ...... 61 1. Inclusion of Tributaries to the Snake River .................................... 62 2. Inclusion of Domestic and Stockwater Rights. ............................... 62 III. GATHERING THE MAJOR PLAYERS ..................................................... 63 A. The SRBA Court .................................................................................. 63 B. The United States ................................................................................. 63 C. IDWR ................................................................................................... 64 D. The State of Idaho, State Agencies, and the Office of the Attorney General ................................................................................. 64 E. Conservation Groups ............................................................................ 64 F. Private Water Users/Claimants ............................................................. 65 G. The Steering Committee ...................................................................... 65 IV. SRBA PROCEDURES ................................................................................ 66 A. Dividing the SRBA into Bite Sized Pieces .......................................... 67 B. IDWR’s Claims Taking Procedures ..................................................... 68 C. IDWR Claims Investigation Procedures .............................................. 69 D. SRBA Court Procedures ...................................................................... 71 E. What is a Partial Decree? ..................................................................... 72 1. Ownership ....................................................................................... 73 2. Source ............................................................................................. 74 3. Quantity .......................................................................................... 75 4. Priority Date .................................................................................... 76 5. Point of Diversion ........................................................................... 77 6. Purpose of Use ................................................................................ 78 7. Period of Use .................................................................................. 78 8. Place of Use .................................................................................... 78 9. Other Provisions Necessary ............................................................ 79 10. Explanatory Remarks .................................................................... 80 F. Error Correction .................................................................................... 80 G. Basin-Wide Issues ................................................................................ 81 H. General Provisions ............................................................................... 81 V. THE 1994 LEGISLATIVE AMENDMENTS ............................................... 82 * The authors are current or former Idaho Deputy Attorneys General that represented the State of Idaho or the Idaho Department of Water Resources during the course of the SRBA. The article is based upon their first-hand knowledge of the events discussed. Collectively, the authors have over 100 years of work experience on the Snake River Basin Adjudication. 54 IDAHO LAW REVIEW VOL. 52 A. The Conflicts that Precipitated the Need for the 1994 Amendments ....................................................................................... 83 B. The 1994 Amendments ........................................................................ 85 C. Conflicts Over the Legislative Changes ............................................... 86 1. SRBA Court Decision on Constitutionality .................................... 86 2. Idaho Supreme Court Ruling on Constitutionality .......................... 89 VI. SIGNIFICANT WATER LAW DECISIONS .............................................. 91 A. Forfeiture & the SRBA ........................................................................ 91 1. Forfeiture Generally ........................................................................ 91 2. Tolling of Forfeiture ....................................................................... 92 3. Partial Forfeiture ............................................................................. 93 4. Defenses to Forfeiture ..................................................................... 93 B. Addressing Source Connections ........................................................... 97 1. Basin Wide Issue 5 .......................................................................... 97 2. Separate Source Administration Between the Upper and Lower Snake River ............................................................... 101 C. Memorializing Historic Water Use Practices ..................................... 103 1. Recognizing Historic Changes in Water Use ................................ 104 2. Incorporating Historic General Adjudication Decrees .................. 107 D. Public Trust Doctrine ......................................................................... 112 E. United States’ State Law-Based Water Rights ................................... 114 1. Federal Reservoir Projects. ........................................................... 114 a. Ownership Of Irrigation Storage Water Rights ....................... 116 b. Hydropower Subordination ..................................................... 120 c. Flood Control .......................................................................... 130 2. Bureau of Land Management Water Rights .................................. 146 3. Minidoka Wildlife Refuge ............................................................ 148 VII. FEDERAL RESERVED WATER RIGHTS ............................................ 150 A. Tribal Reserved Water Rights ............................................................ 151 1. Shoshone-Bannock Federal Reserved Water Right Claims .......................................................................................... 153 a. 1990 Fort Hall Indian Water Rights Agreement ..................... 154 b. Fort Hall Agreement Litigation ............................................... 163 c. Shoshone-Bannock Instream Flow Water Right Claims ......... 167 2. The Nez-Perce Indian Water Right Settlement ............................. 168 a. Terms of the 2004 Snake River Water Rights Agreement ...... 170 3. The Shoshone-Paiute Consent Decree .......................................... 173 B. Non-Tribal Federal Reserved Water Rights ....................................... 176 1. Intent to Reserve ........................................................................... 177 a. Wilderness Act ........................................................................ 177 b. Hells Canyon National Recreation Area Act .......................... 182 c. Multiple Use Sustained Yield Act ........................................... 183 d. Wild and Scenic Rivers Act .................................................... 184 e. Sawtooth National Recreation Area Act ................................. 185 f. Deer Flat National Wildlife Refuge ......................................... 187 2. Quantification of Implied Federal Reserved Water Rights .......................................................................................... 188 a. Negotiations ............................................................................ 188 b. Other Federal Reserved Water Rights Cases .......................... 201 VIII. BASIN-WIDE ISSUE 16 AND THE FINAL UNIFIED DECREE ........ 204 2016 UNDERSTANDING THE SNAKE RIVER BASIN 55 ADJUDICATION A. Basin-Wide Issue 16 .......................................................................... 204 B. Basin Closure Orders ......................................................................... 205 C. Proposed Final Unified Decree .......................................................... 205 D. Memorandum
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Minidoka Powerplant Unit 7 Structure Maintenance and Rehabilitation Minidoka County, Idaho
    Finding of No Significant Impact Final Environmental Assessment Minidoka Powerplant Unit 7 Structure Maintenance and Rehabilitation Minidoka County, Idaho U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Pacific Northwest Region Snake River Area Office PN FONSI # 18-11 Introduction The Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation) has prepared this Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) to comply with the Council of Environmental Quality (CEQ) regulations for implementing procedural provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). This document briefly describes the proposed action, other alternatives considered, the scoping process, Reclamation’s consultation and coordination activities, mitigation and Reclamation’s finding. The Final Environmental Assessment (EA) fully documents the analyses of the potential environmental effects of implementing the changes proposed. Location and Background The Minidoka Project, one of the earliest federal Reclamation projects in Idaho, comprises multiple facilities including Minidoka Dam, the reservoir it impounds (Lake Walcott), and Minidoka Powerplant. The Minidoka Project serves lands north and south of the Snake River. Minidoka Dam and Lake Walcott are located in south-central Idaho on the Snake River Plain, north of the junction of Interstate 84/86, east of the town of Rupert, Idaho. Minidoka Dam supplies irrigation water, provides irrigation water storage, and generates power via Minidoka Powerplant that is delivered to the Bonneville Power Administration for marketing (Hess et al. 2002). The original Minidoka Powerplant (Units 1 through 5), completed in 1910, had a total generation capacity of 7.5 megawatts. To meet increased power production needs of the Minidoka Project, as well as to keep pace with the growing market for power in nearby towns, Minidoka Powerplant’s Unit 6 was installed in 1927, and Unit 7 was installed in 1942.
    [Show full text]
  • Dolen, Timothy P
    Historical Development of Durable Concrete for the Bureau of Reclamation Timothy P. Dolen Research Civil Engineer - Senior Technical Specialist Materials Engineering and Research Laboratory Technical Service Center - Denver, Colorado Introduction The Bureau of Reclamation infrastructure stretches across many different climates and environments in the seventeen western states. Many of the dams, spillways, pumping plants, power plants, canals, and tunnels are constructed with concrete. These structures were built from Arizona to Montana, across the plains and in the mountains and deserts. Concrete structures had to remain durable to resist both the design loads and the natural environments of the western climate zones. Many natural environments can be quite destructive to concrete and the earliest Reclamation projects were faced with a variety of durability problems. The state-of-the-art of concrete construction advanced from hand mixing and horse and wagon transporting operations to automated mixing plants, underwater canal construction, and pumping and conveyor placing. This paper first overviews the challenges facing concrete construction in the beginning of the 20th Century. It then traces the Bureau of Reclamation’s role in the development of durable concrete to resist the environments of the west. What is Concrete? Before we begin, we must first understand what is concrete, the most versatile building material. The American Concrete Institute defines concrete as “a composite material that consists essentially of a binding medium within which are embedded particles or fragments of aggregate, usually a combination of fine aggregate and coarse aggregate; in portland-cement concrete, the binder is a mixture of portland cement and water.”1 The earliest concretes date at least as far back as early Roman times including the aqueducts and the historic Pantheon in Rome.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Registration Form
    NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 10024-0018 (Oct. 1990) United States Department of the Interior ,C£$ PftRKSERVIC National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in How to Complete the National Register of Historic Pla Registration Form (National Register Bulletin 16A). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the information requested. If an item does not ap property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcatei instructins. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NPS Form 10-900a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer, to complete all items. 1. Name of Property historic name: American Falls Reservoir Flooded Townsite other name/site number: 2. Location street & number American Falls Reservoir [ ] not for publication city or town American Falls ______ [ X ] vicinity state: Idaho code: ID county: Power code: 077 zip code: 83211 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this [X] nomination [ ] request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36
    [Show full text]
  • Early Irrigation in the Boise Valley By, Paul L. Murphy Source
    Early Irrigation in the Boise Valley By, Paul L. Murphy Source: Pacific Northwest Quarterly, XLIV (October, 1935), 177-184. Agriculture is the dominant feature of Idaho's economy and the major portion of Idaho's agricultural development is predicated upon irrigation. The early pioneering efforts, ambitious as they were, merely opened the door to the vast projects that followed. The difficulties faced and overcome by the early developers were legion: eastern capital had to be enlisted and fluctuations in the money market compounded this problem; the problems of trial-and-error methods in actual construction while the engineering science developed; increasing operational expenses; inadequate legislative statutes to determine the rights and use of the water and the ensuing litigation in the courts all hampered development. The story of how these problems were solved in the early development of irrigation in the Boise Valley is told in the following informative article by Professor Paul L. Murphy. Those interested in further reading will find considerable material available. A classic study is William E. Smythe, The Conquest of Arid America (1899, 1905; reprint ed., Seattle, 1969). George Thomas, Early Irrigation in the Western States (Salt lake City, 1948), is valuable. Mikel H. Williams, The History 6f Development and Current Status of the Carey Act in Idaho (Boise, 1970), is informative. Students should consult the Biennial Report of the Department of Reclamation to the Governor of Idaho, beginning in 1919-1920. A valuable survey of Idaho irrigation is in "Mineral and Water Resources of Idaho," a report prepared by the United States Geological Survey (Washington: 1964).
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Environmental Impact Statement, Minidoka Dam Spillway
    Draft Environmental Impact Statement Minidoka Dam Spillway Replacement Minidoka Project, Idaho U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Pacific Northwest Region Snake River Area Office Boise, Idaho December 2009 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR The mission of the Department of the Interior is to protect and provide access to our Nation’s natural and cultural heritage and honor our trust responsibilities to Indian tribes and our commitments to island communities. MISSION OF THE BUREAU OF RECLAMATION The mission of the Bureau of Reclamation is to manage, develop, and protect water and related resources in an environmentally and economically sound manner in the interest of the American public. Draft Environmental Impact Statement Minidoka Dam Spillway Replacement Minidoka Project, Idaho U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Pacific Northwest Region Snake River Area Office Boise, Idaho December 2009 Draft Environmental Impact Statement Minidoka Dam Spillway Replacement Minidoka County, Idaho Lead Agency: For further information contact: U.S. Department of the Interior Allyn Meuleman Bureau of Reclamation Snake River Area Office Pacific Northwest Region 230 Collins Road Boise, ID 83702-4520 (208) 383-2258 Cooperating Agency: U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Idaho Fish and Wildlife Office Abstract: This Draft Environmental Impact Statement (Draft EIS) examines alternatives to correcting structural problems at the Minidoka Dam Spillway and associated facilities on Lake Walcott, Idaho. Alternatives considered in the Draft EIS are the No Action, as required under the National Environmental Policy Act; total replacement of the spillway and headgate structures; and replacement of just the spillway.
    [Show full text]
  • Snake River Flow Augmentation Impact Analysis Appendix
    SNAKE RIVER FLOW AUGMENTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS APPENDIX Prepared for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Walla Walla District’s Lower Snake River Juvenile Salmon Migration Feasibility Study and Environmental Impact Statement United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Pacific Northwest Region Boise, Idaho February 1999 Acronyms and Abbreviations (Includes some common acronyms and abbreviations that may not appear in this document) 1427i A scenario in this analysis that provides up to 1,427,000 acre-feet of flow augmentation with large drawdown of Reclamation reservoirs. 1427r A scenario in this analysis that provides up to 1,427,000 acre-feet of flow augmentation with reservoir elevations maintained near current levels. BA Biological assessment BEA Bureau of Economic Analysis (U.S. Department of Commerce) BETTER Box Exchange Transport Temperature Ecology Reservoir (a water quality model) BIA Bureau of Indian Affairs BID Burley Irrigation District BIOP Biological opinion BLM Bureau of Land Management B.P. Before present BPA Bonneville Power Administration CES Conservation Extension Service cfs Cubic feet per second Corps U.S. Army Corps of Engineers CRFMP Columbia River Fish Mitigation Program CRP Conservation Reserve Program CVPIA Central Valley Project Improvement Act CWA Clean Water Act DO Dissolved Oxygen Acronyms and Abbreviations (Includes some common acronyms and abbreviations that may not appear in this document) DREW Drawdown Regional Economic Workgroup DDT Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane EIS Environmental Impact Statement EP Effective Precipitation EPA Environmental Protection Agency ESA Endangered Species Act ETAW Evapotranspiration of Applied Water FCRPS Federal Columbia River Power System FERC Federal Energy Regulatory Commission FIRE Finance, investment, and real estate HCNRA Hells Canyon National Recreation Area HUC Hydrologic unit code I.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Twin Falls Visitor Center
    SOUTH CENTRAL IDAHO A PERFECT LOCATION FOR THE ADVENTURINGADVENTURING SPIRIT | OFFICIAL IDAHO STATE TRAVEL GUIDE TRAVEL | OFFICIAL STATE IDAHO 54 Snake River Early settlers found the Snake River Plain a bit too dry for their taste, so they set about building a dam and irrigation canals along the Snake River. These structures so dramatically changed the landscape—turning arid, cracked soil into fertile agricultural fields—that the area became known as the “Magic Valley.” Everywhere you look, you’ll see evidence of the earth’s forces at work: deep canyons, high bluffs, unusual rock formations, and even lava flows. Sure, this area is a geologist’s dream, but its terrain also delivers big fun for the adventurer in you. The Snake River is at the heart of the valley’s recreation, inviting you to swim, raft, speedboat, and paddle its waters, and BASE jump and zip-line into its stunning canyon. The river’s reservoirs are pristine destinations for camping, hunting, and fishing—and are home to an abundance of big game and other wildlife. Throughout the region, see springs surge from within cliff walls and thundering waterfalls crash and churn into canyons. Wander through lava tubes, discover world-famous fossil beds, and eat homemade ice cream. Take a relaxing drive through Hagerman’s peaceful country- side and make your way to City of Rocks National Reserve, where granite columns and spires stand guard over a 500-acre windswept valley. Follow Visit Idaho on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, YouTube and other social media channels. VISITIDAHO.ORG | 55 #VisitIdaho SOUTH CENTRAL IDAHO ‹ ADVENTURES AS DRAMATIC AS THE LANDSCAPE HAGERMAN VALLEY ducer of steelhead and rainbow trout.
    [Show full text]
  • Chile, the Biobío, and the Future of the Columbia River Basin Jerrold A
    Idaho Law Review Volume 53 | Number 1 Article 7 April 2017 Chile, the Biobío, and the Future of the Columbia River Basin Jerrold A. Long Shana Hirsch Jason Walters Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.uidaho.edu/idaho-law-review Recommended Citation Jerrold A. Long, Shana Hirsch & Jason Walters, Chile, the Biobío, and the Future of the Columbia River Basin, 53 Idaho L. Rev. 239 (2017). Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.uidaho.edu/idaho-law-review/vol53/iss1/7 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons @ UIdaho Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Idaho Law Review by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ UIdaho Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CHILE, THE BIOBÍO, AND THE FUTURE OF THE COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN JERROLD A. LONG,* SHANA HIRSCH,** JASON WALTERS*** TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ................................................................ 240 II. FINDING LESSONS IN THE DIFFERENCES: WHY COMPARING CHILE AND THE COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN MAKES SENSE .................................................. 242 A. Climate Change and Altered Hydrologic Regimes ..... 242 B. United States Analogues to the Biobío ....................... 244 III. WATER RESOURCE HISTORIES .................................. 247 A. “Redemption” of the arid lands—Water resource development in the Columbia River Basin ................ 247 B. Dams and the Engines of Economic Development in Chile .......................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Bureau of :Reclama\.Ion
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT . OF THE IBTERIOR . GEOLOGICAL SUR'V'EY WATER :RESOURCES DIVISION GROUND WA'l;'ER :BRANCH PBELIMI:B'ARY ImPORT O!l GBOUID WATER IN THE :SOliABZA LAD AliEAv. POWEll .A:RD !LAINE COUNTIES, IDAHO B7 Harold Meisler Open-file r~rt. SnbJect to revision. Preparecl for the 11. s. :Bureau of :Reclama\.ion Boise, I4abo August 1958 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER RESOURCES D!VI SION GROUND WATER BRANCH PRBILIMINARY :REPORT ON GROUID WATER IN THE :BONANZA L.AXE AREA 9 POWER ADD l3LAINE COUNTIES~ IDAHO ~ »y Harold Meisler OF 58-G7 9pen-file r~ort$ Snbject to revision. Prepared for the Uo S. !ureau of Bselamation Boise, Idaho August 1958 '· ·-. CONTENTS P~e Abstract . .. " . l Introduction . " .. • • 0 2 Purpose and scope of report . 2 Location and extent of area . 3 Methods of investigation . 3 Well-numbering s,ystem 5 ~ • 0 6 Geographic setting . o- "-• «> •~•• Geologie formations and their water-bearing Qba.racteristics g Ground water • . • • • • • 0 • . 13 Occurrence and sources • • 0 • • • . 13' 14 Direction of ground-water movement . ~ " Ground-water discharge • • " . • . • q • 14 Relation betw,een the regional water tabl·e and the Snake Riv .er • . • • • . • • • • • .. 10· • .. • • .. • • 16 Conclusions . Logs of wells and core holes . .. 21 References . • • • • • • .. • • . 28 ILLUSTRATION'S Plate 1 . Map of the :Bonanza Lake area showing well locations and water-table contour • • .. • • • • • • • • • ., Pocket Figure 1 • . Index map of southern I d.aho showillg area cover.ed , by this r .eport • • • • • . • . • • • • • • • • • 4 ILLUSTRATIONs--Continued Page Figure 4. Schematic diagram Showing possible relation of . ,_ ,· ground water to Snake River in area from American Falls Reservoir to Lake Walcott • • • 20 TABLES Table 1.
    [Show full text]
  • American Falls Reservoir Is the Largest Reservoir of the Project
    Finding of No Significant Impact Final Environmental Assessment Maintenance and Rehabilitation of Spillway and Dam Structures at American Falls Dam, Minidoka Project, Power County, Idaho U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Pacific Northwest Region Snake River Area Office PN FONSI # 19-4 Introduction The Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation) has prepared this Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) to comply with the Council of Environmental Quality (CEQ) regulations for implementing procedural provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). This document briefly describes the proposed action, other alternatives considered, the scoping process, Reclamation’s consultation and coordination activities, mitigation, and Reclamation’s finding. The Final Environmental Assessment (EA) fully documents the analyses of the potential environmental effects of implementing the changes proposed. Location and Background The Minidoka Project (Project) was authorized by the Secretary of the Interior in 1904 and was the first Reclamation project constructed in Idaho. It is located in the Snake River Basin in the southeastern part of the state. American Falls Dam, completed in 1927, is a 94-foot-high composite concrete and earth gravity-type dam on river mile 714.7 of the Snake River near American Falls, Idaho. With a storage capacity of 1,700,000 acre-feet, American Falls Reservoir is the largest reservoir of the Project. The dam itself is located in Power County, Idaho, but the reservoir stretches northeast into both Bingham and Bannock Counties. American Falls Dam and Reservoir comprise a multi-purpose facility from which principle benefits include irrigation, power generation (through a powerplant owned and operated by Idaho Power), flood control, fish and wildlife resources, and recreation.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Degradation, Resource War, Irrigation and the Transformation of Culture on Idaho's Snake River Plain, 1805--1927
    UNLV Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers, and Capstones 12-2011 Newe country: Environmental degradation, resource war, irrigation and the transformation of culture on Idaho's Snake River plain, 1805--1927 Sterling Ross Johnson University of Nevada, Las Vegas Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/thesesdissertations Part of the Military History Commons, Social History Commons, and the United States History Commons Repository Citation Johnson, Sterling Ross, "Newe country: Environmental degradation, resource war, irrigation and the transformation of culture on Idaho's Snake River plain, 1805--1927" (2011). UNLV Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers, and Capstones. 1294. http://dx.doi.org/10.34917/2838925 This Thesis is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by Digital Scholarship@UNLV with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Thesis in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This Thesis has been accepted for inclusion in UNLV Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers, and Capstones by an authorized administrator of Digital Scholarship@UNLV. For more information, please contact [email protected]. NEWE COUNTRY: ENVIRONMENTAL DEGRADATION, RESOURCE WAR, IRRIGATION AND THE TRANSFORMATION
    [Show full text]
  • Water Utilizatjq^ in the Snake Rivm Basin
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Harold L. Ickes, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY W. C. Mendenhall, Director Water-Supply Paper 657 WATER UTILIZATJQ^ IN THE SNAKE RIVM BASIN ""-^r B<5 °o ^ «-? %*-« ^t«4 ____ ^n -" wC> v r v*> ^ /-^ T"i --O ^ o f^* t TA ^-- ± BY ^^^ W. G. HOYT \, ^ r-^ Co WITH A PREFACE ^ -^ "^ o o. ^ HERMAN STABLER ' ^ ^ e 'r1 t<A to ^ ^ >Jt C---\ V*-O r&1 """^*_> ® p <,A -o xi CP ^3 P* O ^ y» * "^ 0V - f\ *"^ . , UNITED STATKS GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON: 1935 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, Washington, D.C. - - - Price $1.00 (Paper cover) CONTENTS Page Preface, by Herman Stabler._______________________________________ ix Abstract _________________________________________________________ 1 Introduction__ _ _________________________________________________ 2 Purpose and scope of report.___________________________________ 2 Cooperation and base data.____________________________________ 3 Index system.._______________________________________________ 6 General features of Snake River Basin.______________________________ 6 Location and extent.__________________________________________ 6 Geographic and topographic features.___________________________ 7 Snake River system._____-_-----_____-_________-_____-_-__-_.._ 7 Tributaries to Snake River.____________________________________ 9 Historical review-__________________________________________________ 20 Scenic and recreational features.-...________________________________ 21 Climate____________________________A____ ___________________ 23 Natural vegetation_________________-_____-____________----__-_---._
    [Show full text]