DOCSLIB.ORG

Economic Impact of Natural Gas Development on Delta County

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Economic Impact of Natural Gas Development on Delta County Turner Creek Roadless Area Clear Fork Salt Creek Roadless Area Roadless Area Economic Impact of Natural Gas Hu R DevelopmentFlattops/Elk Park on Delta County Roadless Area PROPOSED PROJECT:Elec t ric Mountain THE NORTH FORK MANCOSRoadless A rea MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN J U N E 2017 «¬5 Currant Creek Roadless Area Pilot Knob Roadless Area «¬33 GUNNISON CEDAREDGE COUNTY Flatiron Roadless PAONIA Sunset Roadless Area North Fork Recreation District HOTCHKISS Mount Lamborn Roadless Area West El Wilde CRAWFORD Gunnison Gorge Wilderness Wilderness Area Mendicant Roadless Area MONTROSE COUNTY Economic Impact of Natural Gas Development on Delta County PROPOSED PROJECT: THE NORTH FORK MANCOS MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN J U N E 2017 Author: Andrew Forkes-Gudmundson Copyright © 2017 by Citizens for a Healthy Community All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be used or reproduced by any means, graphic, electronic, or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, taping, scanning or by any information storage retrieval system without the written permission of the author except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical articles and reviews. Citizens for a Healthy Community (CHC) is a grassroots nonproft 501(c)3 organization dedicated to protecting the air, water and foodsheds within the Delta County region of Southwest Colorado from the impacts of oil and gas development. CHC is the county’s watchdog for oil and gas development, conducts research and advocacy, and works with partner organizations to fght for the health and safety of citizens and implementation of safeguards to protect public health and the environment. Citizens for a Healthy Community Ofce: Te Harvester Building, 211 Grand. Ave, Paonia, CO 81428 Mailing address: PO Box 1283, Paonia, CO 81428 Phone: (970) 399-9700 www.chc4you.org PHOTO CREDIT: JT T HOMAS Table of Contents Introduction . .4 NFMMDP Revenue. .5 Local Government Oil and Gas Revenue. .5 Oil and Gas Revenue for Delta County. .6 Impact on Other Sources of Revenue for Delta County . .8 Outdoor Recreation. 8 Agriculture and Agritourism . 10 Property Taxes. 11 Local Government Costs Associated with Oil and Gas Development. 14 Conclusion . 15 3 I. Introduction Te majority of oil and gas leases and proposed oil and gas development in Delta County are in the North Fork Valley and its headwaters and watersheds. Te Delta County Board of County Commissioners is in favor of oil and gas development, citing job creation and tax revenues as economic benefts. However, North Fork Valley residents, who would be directly impacted by such industrial activities, are resound- ingly opposed to oil and gas development and believe that such activities, would not only result in degradation of public health and the environment, but are also incompatible with the local economy. While the County would like to make up for lost coal jobs and revenue, North Fork Valley residents want to protect a growing local economy that has been transitioning away from extractive industries towards sustainable agriculture, tourism, recreation, art and music, and renewable energy. Te North Fork Valley has worked hard to develop its brand over the last twenty years as evidenced by its Colorado Creative District designation, award-winning wines, fruits and vegetables, and regional, state, and national recognition as a recreation and agritourism destination. Te North Fork Valley is a magnet for the eco-concious, young families and retirees who value quality of life, and continuously attracts talent and skills from around the world. Paonia has been especially successful in this efort, as the only town in Delta County that has shown growth.1 In addition, the North Fork Valley real estate market has outperformed the overall County since 2011 in terms of average residential home sale price.2 Te North Fork Valley is a unique and beau- tiful place. It is the location of the highest concentration of organic farms in Colorado, and is home to numerous outdoor recreation opportunities. In addition, the Upper North Fork is the headwaters region for critical watersheds to downstream farms and homes. To address these competing visions for the future of the North Fork Valley and Delta County, Citizens for a Healthy Community (CHC) researched the estimated costs and revenues to Delta County of a proposed natural gas project. To CHC’s knowledge, Delta County has not undertaken a cost-beneft analysis of proposed oil and gas development, nor has it compared or projected the efects of oil and gas development on the leading sources of County revenue likely to be impacted by such development— residential property taxes, and sales taxes from outdoor recreation and agritourism. CHC is flling this critical gap in information and decision-making to educate the public and the County on the economic impact of proposed oil and gas development. Tis research focuses on the proposed North Fork Mancos Master Development Plan (NFMMDP), esti- mated property and severance tax revenues, the costs to the County estimated from the total NFMMDP project, current residential property tax revenues to the County, and the direct and indirect economic ben- efts the County receives from an outdoor recreation and agritourism economy that relies on surrounding public lands. Te NFMMDP proposes drilling 35 wells, three of which would be located in Delta County. Our research revealed that the NFMMDP would result in a net economic loss to the County when all fore- seeable costs (for example road repair, lost residential property tax revenue, and lost sales tax from outdoor recreation and agritourism income) are subtracted from estimated property and severance tax revenues. 1. Delta County Demographic and Economic Profile, Colorado Department of Local Affairs 2014, p. 1 2. Average Sale Price for Residential Properties Delta County Sales (as reported to the MLS) Delta County vs. North Fork Area 2005-2016, prepared by Bob Lario and the Remax Office in Paonia, based on data provided by the Delta County Board of Realtors, 2016. (hereinafter Average Sale Price for Residential 4 Properties) II. NFMMDP Revenue Gunnison Energy, LLC (GELLC) has proposed a project called the North Fork Mancos Master Development Plan, which would place 35 new gas wells 12 miles north of Paonia, at the intersection of three critical watersheds. Te project requires four new wellpads and expansion of one existing wellpad. Te existing well pad is a part of the Iron Point Federal Unit located in Delta County. Tree new wells will be drilled from this pad. GELLC proposes to produce 700 billion cubic feet of natural gas over the 30-year lifetime of the project from the 35 proposed wells. Although GELLC envisions future development, which could increase the total number of wells within the NFMMDP project boundary to 104 wells, with estimated production of 2.1 trillion cubic feet of natural gas, our research only considered the 35-well project released to the public by the BLM for scoping comments on January 18, 2017. Additionally, we focused on the three wells out of 35 that would be drilled in Delta County. Te NFMMDP proposes a 3-year construction and completion timeline for the project. Te project is still undergoing scoping comments, and will then have to undergo either an Environmental Assessment, or preferably, and Environmental Impact Statement. Depending which one the BLM requires, if the project is approved it could begin as early as Fall 2017 or the beginning of 2018.3 LOCAL GOVERNMENT OIL AND GAS REVENUE Local governments in Colorado derive income from oil and gas wells in two ways—property taxes and severance taxes. Both are based on production volume. County governments assess property taxes, and the state assesses severance taxes. Once the state has assessed the severance tax, it redistributes portions of it back to local governments. Roughly half of the severance collected on production in a county is returned to that county.4 Local governments in Colorado derive income from oil and gas wells in two ways— property taxes and severance taxes. Oil and gas property taxes in Colorado are based on the production value of property. Te taxable assessed value of an oil and gas property is based on actual market value adjusted by an assessment ratio, which is 87.5% for oil and natural gas.5 Headwaters Economics created the following formula for estimating property tax: ((Prior year assessed value * .95) * .87) * (.058636).6 3. Proposed Action NFMMDP for Oil and Gas Exploration and Development Gunnison and Delta Coun- ties, Colorado, prepared by Gunnison Energy, LLC, January 2017, p. 1. (Hereinafter NFMMDP) 4. Oil and Gas Industry Economic and Fiscal Contributions in Colorado by County, 2014, Business Re- search Division, Leeds School of Business, December 2015 p. 16-17 (Hereinafter Economic and Fiscal Contributions) 5. Economic and Fiscal Contributions, p. 13-14 6. How Colorado Returns Unconventional Oil Revenue to Local Governments, Headwaters Economics, 5 January 2014, p. 5 (Hereinafter Colorado Unconventional Oil Revenue) Severance taxes in Colorado are assessed on a sliding scale from 2-5% based on gross income from pro- duction (almost all wells produce enough to be assessed the 5% rate). Severance taxes are complicated by the ad valorem tax credit, which allows producers to deduct 87.5% of their prior year’s property tax burden from their severance tax bill.7 Headwaters Economics created the following formula for estimat- ing severance tax: (((Gross production value * .95) * .05)+ 300,000) – (prior year property tax * .875)8 Over the life of an average well in Colorado, once all available deductions are taken into account, there is an estimated efective property tax rate of 4.87% of total production value, and an efective severance tax rate of 1.87% of total production value.9 With the State returning approximately 50% of collected severance tax from oil and gas operations within the county, the efective county severance tax rate is 0.935%.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Gunnison National Forest Travel Management Record of Decision
    APPENDICES A-D Gunnison National Forest Travel Management Record of Decision June 2010 Gunnison National Forest Travel Management Appendices for ROD — 1 Record of Decision (ROD) Gunnison National Forest Travel Management DECISION TABLE KEY FOR APPENDICES A-D Decision Code Description F Trail open to and designed for Foot travel l HO Trail designed for Pack and Saddle (P&S) use, allowed use is Foot and P&S U Unmanaged Foot/P&S trail, not a part of the maintained or signed trail system NM/MB Trail open to non-motorized uses, where trail is built to mountain bike trail design standards NM/HO Trail open to non-motorized uses, where trail is built to pack and saddle design standards MO Trail open to and designed for Single Track motorized travel ATV Trail open to and designed for motorized vehicles less than 50 inches in width JEEP OHV Trail - opened to all motorized vehicles, managed as a trail HC High clearance road (Level 2) open to motorized use; non licensed vehicles allowed PSG3 High clearance road (Level 2) open to motorized use; non licensed vehicles allowed PSG3_NNL High clearance road (Level 2) open to motorized use; non licensed vehicles allowed PSG4 Passenger vehicle road (Level 4) licensed and non-licensed vehicles allowed PSG5 Passenger vehicle road (Level 5) licensed vehicles only D Route is identified to be closed DE Route is currently decommissioned and will remain closed A Administrative road, motorized travel is allowed by permit A-TRAIL Non motorized trail allowing administrative use by motorized vehicles less than 50 in.
    [Show full text]
  • Meeting Record
    BULL MOOSE SPORTSMENS ALLIANCE/COLORADO BACKCOUNTRY HUNTERS AND ANGLERS/COLORADO TROUT UNLIMITED/COLORADO WILDLIFE FEDERATION/NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION/THEODORE ROOSEVELT CONSERVATION PARTNERSHIP/TROUT UNLIMITED/WESTERN NATIVE TROUT INITIATIVE Sportsmen's Recommendations for Supporting the Proposed Colorado Roadless Rule Problem 1: At 562,000 acres, the upper tier category in the preferred alternative is too small and fails to include much of the most important fish and wildlife habitat. Solution: After further upper tier areas are included by the agency for the Pike-San Isabel and Rio Grande national forests, the acreage of upper tier lands in the preferred alternative should increase to a total of at least 1.4 million acres (33% of Colorado's road less acres) using the prioritized list of road less areas below. Upper tier lands bordering Community Protection Zones may be cut back in acreage so the bordering areas are not included in the upper tier (the overlap is roughly 22,000 acres total). All Alternative 2 lands already placed in upper tier should remain there. Rationale: The upper tier category has been created to balance narrowly defined exceptions in the CO rule such as coal mining, ski area development, and community protection zone logging. This is very similar to the "Primitive" and "Wild Land Recreation" categories used to balance development allowances in the Idaho roadless rule. While important, the preferred alternative (alt. 2) acres are limited to areas where forest plans already prohibit road building. Using these acres as upper tier does not address key fish and wildlife habitat nor does it illustrate a commitment by the Forest Service to go beyond their current plans and create a truly protective rule.
    [Show full text]
  • North Fork Valley Ranch Paonia, Colorado
    NORTH FORK VALLEY RANCH PAONIA, COLORADO 4,294± ACRES | $5,482,000 Fantastic location in Western Colorado between Aspen and Montrose, and just one hour from commercial air service at the Montrose Airport. Great skiing just 1 hour and 50 minutes away in Aspen, or 2 and a half hours away in Telluride. The ranch sits on the south face of the Grand Mesa above the North Fork of the Gunnison River Valley, just 5 miles north of the town of Paonia. Surrounded by Public Land on three sides, the ranch offers year-round county road access. There is trophy buck hunting and great elk hunting, via over the counter elk tags. Revenue potential on the ranch includes grazing, hunting, and limited timber production. Featuring year-round live water via two creeks, and numerous springs and spring-fed ponds. Vegetation includes Oaks at the bottom and great Aspen and timber cover on the top. There are three large cabins with domestic water taps, solar power, and generators. The ranch boasts numerous building sites with fantastic views of the West Elk Mountain Range. This is one of the largest, most beautiful ranches in the area, and is priced very aggressively at $1,276 per acre. LISTING AGENT: MIKE McGARRY C: 970.209.1895 | [email protected] © 2016 LONE EAGLE LAND BROKERAGE | 970.249.4300 | WWW.EAGLELAND.COM | [email protected] © 2016 LONE EAGLE LAND BROKERAGE | 970.249.4300 | WWW.EAGLELAND.COM | [email protected] — 2 — © 2016 LONE EAGLE LAND BROKERAGE | 970.249.4300 | WWW.EAGLELAND.COM | [email protected] — 3 — LOCALE Delta County (pop.
    [Show full text]
  • 36 CFR Ch. II (7–1–13 Edition) § 294.49
    § 294.49 36 CFR Ch. II (7–1–13 Edition) subpart shall prohibit a responsible of- Line Includes ficial from further restricting activi- Colorado roadless area name upper tier No. acres ties allowed within Colorado Roadless Areas. This subpart does not compel 22 North St. Vrain ............................................ X the amendment or revision of any land 23 Rawah Adjacent Areas ............................... X 24 Square Top Mountain ................................. X management plan. 25 Troublesome ............................................... X (d) The prohibitions and restrictions 26 Vasquez Adjacent Area .............................. X established in this subpart are not sub- 27 White Pine Mountain. ject to reconsideration, revision, or re- 28 Williams Fork.............................................. X scission in subsequent project decisions Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre, Gunnison National Forest or land management plan amendments 29 Agate Creek. or revisions undertaken pursuant to 36 30 American Flag Mountain. CFR part 219. 31 Baldy. (e) Nothing in this subpart waives 32 Battlements. any applicable requirements regarding 33 Beaver ........................................................ X 34 Beckwiths. site specific environmental analysis, 35 Calamity Basin. public involvement, consultation with 36 Cannibal Plateau. Tribes and other agencies, or compli- 37 Canyon Creek-Antero. 38 Canyon Creek. ance with applicable laws. 39 Carson ........................................................ X (f) If any provision in this subpart
    [Show full text]
  • Profiles of Colorado Roadless Areas
    PROFILES OF COLORADO ROADLESS AREAS Prepared by the USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region July 23, 2008 INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 2 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS ARAPAHO-ROOSEVELT NATIONAL FOREST ......................................................................................................10 Bard Creek (23,000 acres) .......................................................................................................................................10 Byers Peak (10,200 acres)........................................................................................................................................12 Cache la Poudre Adjacent Area (3,200 acres)..........................................................................................................13 Cherokee Park (7,600 acres) ....................................................................................................................................14 Comanche Peak Adjacent Areas A - H (45,200 acres).............................................................................................15 Copper Mountain (13,500 acres) .............................................................................................................................19 Crosier Mountain (7,200 acres) ...............................................................................................................................20 Gold Run (6,600 acres) ............................................................................................................................................21
    [Show full text]
  • Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre, and Gunnison National Forests DRAFT Wilderness Evaluation Report August 2018
    United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre, and Gunnison National Forests DRAFT Wilderness Evaluation Report August 2018 Designated in the original Wilderness Act of 1964, the Maroon Bells-Snowmass Wilderness covers more than 183,000 acres spanning the Gunnison and White River National Forests. In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English. To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form.
    [Show full text]
  • Summits on the Air – ARM for USA - Colorado (WØC)
    Summits on the Air – ARM for USA - Colorado (WØC) Summits on the Air USA - Colorado (WØC) Association Reference Manual Document Reference S46.1 Issue number 3.2 Date of issue 15-June-2021 Participation start date 01-May-2010 Authorised Date: 15-June-2021 obo SOTA Management Team Association Manager Matt Schnizer KØMOS Summits-on-the-Air an original concept by G3WGV and developed with G3CWI Notice “Summits on the Air” SOTA and the SOTA logo are trademarks of the Programme. This document is copyright of the Programme. All other trademarks and copyrights referenced herein are acknowledged. Page 1 of 11 Document S46.1 V3.2 Summits on the Air – ARM for USA - Colorado (WØC) Change Control Date Version Details 01-May-10 1.0 First formal issue of this document 01-Aug-11 2.0 Updated Version including all qualified CO Peaks, North Dakota, and South Dakota Peaks 01-Dec-11 2.1 Corrections to document for consistency between sections. 31-Mar-14 2.2 Convert WØ to WØC for Colorado only Association. Remove South Dakota and North Dakota Regions. Minor grammatical changes. Clarification of SOTA Rule 3.7.3 “Final Access”. Matt Schnizer K0MOS becomes the new W0C Association Manager. 04/30/16 2.3 Updated Disclaimer Updated 2.0 Program Derivation: Changed prominence from 500 ft to 150m (492 ft) Updated 3.0 General information: Added valid FCC license Corrected conversion factor (ft to m) and recalculated all summits 1-Apr-2017 3.0 Acquired new Summit List from ListsofJohn.com: 64 new summits (37 for P500 ft to P150 m change and 27 new) and 3 deletes due to prom corrections.
    [Show full text]
  • Voga2017-18.Pdf
    Directory Sponsors Platinum Level Kampe Foundation - Anastacia Kampe Silver Level Elaine & Jim Brett Sally & Robert Hardy Supporting Memberships Laureen & Roger Bissell Patricia Locke Boyd N. Boland Judy Martin Leslie Bracewell Lynn D. Mattingly Len Chmiel Heidi McGuire & Chuck Knuth Dogpatch Farm Lisa & Erich Niermann Allison Elliot and Hal Brill Petedog Produce LLC Marsha & Don Grant San Juan Honey Company Vicki Halladay Taplin Family Farms Pete & Sue Housel Tiger Lily Farm Joy Kuhlman The Ninth Wave Denise Claire Laverty Ruth & Jeff Wentzel VOGA Vision We envision a vibrant community of prosperous, local farms that sustain the land and provide healthy agricultural products. Mission Statement The mission of Valley Organic Growers Association is to promote local sustainable agriculture by supporting and educating producers and consumers. Our Guiding Principles are to: Create and support viable local agriculture. Maintain and improve the health of our soil, air and water. Ensure the production of nutritious food, free from synthetic inputs. Listing members include certified producers as well as others that employ a range of practices that are not certified. It is incumbent upon the consumer to ask the grower about the practices they use. VOGA History VOGA was founded in 1992 in the beautiful North Fork Valley of the Gunnison River. We have the largest concentration of organic/sustain- able growers in the state. VOGA was formed to support growers, educate consumers, and promote the benefits of sustainable agriculture that provides fresh, regionally unique products. Our membership has grown to include small and mid-size growers, ranchers, retailers, and individuals who share our vision. In 2010, VOGA formed a non-profit arm, Valley Organic Growers Educational Alliance (VOGEA), to help underwrite the educa- tional portion of our mission.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Recorded Plats in Delta County
    DELTA COUNTY, COLORADO DEBBIE GRIFFITH, COUNTY ASSESSOR County Courthouse • 501 Palmer Street • Suite 210 • Delta • Colorado • 81416 PHONE: (970) 874-2120 FAX: (970) 874-2482 LIST OF RECORDED PLATS IN DELTA COUNTY SORTED BY PLAT NAME DATES COVERED: FEBRUARY 1883*-DECEMBER 2017 DISCLAIMER: This data has been compiled from numerous sources by the Delta County Assessor’s office and/or the Delta County Geographical Information Systems department; therefore the accuracy, timeliness, and completeness of this data is not guaranteed. This data was collected, compiled, and structured for specific uses, and/or statutory or regulatory purposes and may not be usable or applicable for other uses. COPIES OF ACTUAL PLATS ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING/PURCHASE AT THE DELTA COUNTY CLERK & RECORDER’S OFFICE, 501 PALMER ST., STE. 211, DELTA, CO 81416; TELEPHONE (970) 874-2150; FAX (970) 874-2161. (Cost of purchase is $5.00 per page for a 24” X 36” copy. Contact the Clerk’s office for mailing costs if copies are to be mailed.) *Recorded plats prior to this date are housed at the Gunnison County Clerk & Recorder’s Office, as this was the date that Delta County was created from portions of Gunnison County. Friday, March 02, 2018 2018 PLAT by Name 2:33:29 PM ID RECEPT # NAME BK PG DATE SECT TOW RAN STATE NO 4164 631581 "A" Street Addition of the Town of 1/26/2009 30 14 92 3243-30 Hotchkiss 4640 666653 10079 Highway 92 5/21/2013 29 14 94 3239-294 1 505104 11th Street Add 18 91 6/4/1997 19 15 95 3455-19 4049 625219 1623 Bluff Street Investors LLC 5/1/2008 19 15 95
    [Show full text]
  • West Elk Coal Mine: Complaint
    Case 1:19-cv-01920 Document 1 Filed 07/02/19 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 50 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 1:19-1920 WILDEARTH GUARDIANS, HIGH COUNTRY CONSERVATION ADVOCATES, CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, SIERRA CLUB, and WILDERNESS WORKSHOP, Petitioners, v. DAVID L. BERNHARDT, in his official capacity as United States Secretary of the Interior; UNITED STATES OFFICE OF SURFACE MINING RECLAMATION AND ENFORCEMENT; JOSEPH BALASH, in his official capacity as Assistant Secretary of Land and Minerals Management, U.S. Department of the Interior, GLENDA OWENS, in her official capacity as Acting Director of U.S. Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement; DAVID BERRY, in his official capacity as Regional Director of U.S. Office of Surface Mining, Western Region; Federal Respondents. PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AGENCY ACTION INTRODUCTION 1. For the past thirty-seven years, the beautiful, forested mountains of Western Colorado have been under siege as the West Elk Coal Mine has metastasized across the landscape. Through a series of more than a dozen modifications to its federal coal leases and mining plans, West Elk has continually grown and now sprawls over nearly 20,000 acres of lands, including more than 13,000 acres of National Forest lands. In 2017, BLM and the Forest Case 1:19-cv-01920 Document 1 Filed 07/02/19 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 50 Service authorized the most recent 1,720 acre expansion of West Elk into the previously undisturbed Sunset Roadless Area. 2. This action challenges Federal Defendants’ recent approval of the “Mining Plan” authorizing the development of publicly owned coal across this new expansion.
    [Show full text]
  • What Are We Doing Here? Drought, Dread and Family in the American Southwest by Cally Carswell CONTENTS
    ‘PUNISHMENT COMEDY’ | THE ARIDIFYING SOUTHWEST | REDEFINING RESTORATION High Country ForN people whoews care about the West August 6, 2018 | $5 | Vol. 50 No. 13 | www.hcn.org 13 50 No. | $5 Vol. August 6, 2018 What Are We Doing Here? Drought, dread and family in the American Southwest By Cally Carswell CONTENTS Editor’s note When dreams dry up We knew it was going to be a weird summer when it barely snowed all winter. By the end of May, the last patches of white had vanished from 11,401-foot Mount Lamborn, and the words, “Never seen anything like it,” slipped out of the mouths of even our most ardent climate skeptics. A month later, irrigation ditches stopped flowing, and skies grew murky from wildfires. An oppressive atmosphere settled over our valley, like the aftermath of a presidential tweet storm. That made it even weirder when, on July 8, a friend spotted what looked like a body floating down turgid Minnesota Creek, just outside of town. A microburst had dumped three-quarters of an inch of rain in less than an hour, swelling the dismal trickle to a full-fledged flood. The man was lucky to survive; he’d been swept into the creek a half-mile upstream while trying to jump across it. Somehow he dragged Don Bustos adjusts the headgate to the acequia that runs through his and neighboring farms and orchards in himself out, muddy and cold as a crawdad. Española, New Mexico, where his ancestors began farming more than 400 years ago. STEFAN WACHS How quickly and violently the climate tables can turn in the West, and how unprepared for this FEATURE we generally are.
    [Show full text]
  • Texas Creek, (2,600 Acres)
    GRAND MESA, UNCOMPAHGRE, AND GUNNISON NATIONAL FOREST Agate Creek, (11,800 acres)............................................................................................................ 3 American Flag Mountain, (11,900 acres) ....................................................................................... 4 Baldy, (2,300 acres) ........................................................................................................................ 5 Battlements, (24,400 acres)............................................................................................................. 6 Beaver (3,700 acres) ....................................................................................................................... 7 Beckwiths, (18,400 acres) ............................................................................................................... 8 Calamity Basin, (12,500 acres) ....................................................................................................... 9 Cannibal Plateau, (14,500 acres) .................................................................................................. 10 Canyon Creek (10,900 acres); Canyon Creek/Antero, (1,700 acres) ........................................... 11 Carson, (6,000 acres) .................................................................................................................... 13 Castle, (9,400 acres) ...................................................................................................................... 14 Cataract,
    [Show full text]