DOCSLIB.ORG

Appendix E-Special Status Plant & Wildlife Species

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Appendix E-Special Status Plant & Wildlife Species Table E-1. Special-Status Plant Species with Documented Occurrences in the City of Modesto General Plan Area (Based on occurrences within the Avena, Brush Lake, Ceres, Denair, Escalon, Oakdale, Salida, Riverbank, and Waterford 7.5 minute USGS quadrangles and Federal and State- listed species documented within Stanislaus County, April 2015) Page 1 of 8 Statusa: Common and Federal/State/ Blooming Potential for Occurrence in Scientific Name CNPS Distribution Preferred Habitats Period the General Plan Areab Large-flowered fiddleneck E/E/1B.1 Alameda, Contra Costa, San Joaquin, Cismontane woodland, valley and April-May Low Stanislaus (USFWS list only). foothill grassland. Amsinckia grandiflora Alkali milk-vetch –/–/1B.2 Merced, Solano, and Yolo Counties. Grassy flats and vernal pool March-June Moderate Historically more widespread. margins, on alkali soils, below Astragalus tener var. tener 200 feet. Heartscale –/–/1B.2 Alameda, Butte, Contra Costa, Colusa, Alkali grassland, alkali meadow, April-October Moderate Fresno, Glenn, Kern, Madera, and alkali scrub, 0-1,837 feet. Atriplex cordulata Merced, San Luis Obispo, Solano, and Stanislaus counties. Western Central Valley and valleys of adjacent foothills. Crownscale –/–/4.2 Alameda, Contra Costa, Fresno, Chenopod scrub, valley and March-October Moderate Glenn, Kings, Kern, Merced, foothill grassland, vernal pools, Atriplex coronata var. Monterey, San Joaquin, San Luis on fine alkaline soils, 3-1,935 coronata Obispo, Solano, and Stanislaus feet. counties. Southern Sacramento Valley, San Joaquin valley, eastern south coast inner range. Brittlescale –/–/1B.2 Alameda, Contra Costa, Colusa, Alkali grassland, alkali meadow, April-October Moderate Fresno, Glenn, Kern, Merced, Solano, alkali scrub, chenopod scrub, Atriplex depressa Stanislaus, Tulare, and Yolo counties. playas, and valley and foothill Western Central Valley and valleys of grasslands on alkaline or clay adjacent foothills on west side of soils, 3-1,050 feet. Central Valley. Lesser saltscale –/–/1B.1 Alameda, Butte, Fresno, Kern, Alkali grassland, alkali meadow, May-October High Madera, Merced, Tulare counties. alkali scrub, and saltbush scrub, Atriplex minuscula between 50 and 650 feet. Vernal pool (persistent- –/–/1B.2 Colusa, Glenn, Madera, Merced, Dry beds of vernal pools, on June-October Moderate fruited) saltscale Solano, and Tulare counties. alkaline soils, between 33 and 380 feet. Atriplex persistens Table E-1. Continued Page 2 of 8 Statusa: Common and Federal/State/ Blooming Potential for Occurrence in Scientific Name CNPS Distribution Preferred Habitats Period the General Plan Areab subtle orache –/–/1B.2 Butte, Fresno, Kings, Kern, Madera, Alkaline soils, valley and foothill June-October Moderate Merced, Stanislaus, and Tulare grassland between 130 and 330 Atriplex subtilis counties. feet. Big tarplant –/–/1B.1 Alameda, Contra Costa, San Joaquin, Valley and foothill grassland, July-October Moderate and Stanislaus counties. 100- 1,650 feet. Blepharizonia plumosa Chinese Camp brodiaea T/E/1B.1 Calaveras, Tuolumne, Stanislaus Vernal streambeds and serpentine May-June Low. No serpentine habitats are County) USFWS county list only). substrates in cismontane known in the area and this Brodiaea pallida woodland and valley and foothill species is known from only two grassland. occurrences near Chinese Camp. Round-leaved filaree –/–/1B.1 Throughout the Sacramento Valley Open sites, cismontane woodland, March-May Moderate and northern San Joaquin Valley, valley and foothill grassland, dry California macrophylla central-western California, south grasslands, and shrubland, 50- [Erodium macrophyllum] coast, and northern Channel Island. 4,000 feet. Sharsmith’s harebell (Mt. –/–/1B.2 Santa Clara and Stanislaus counties. Barren, rocky serpentinite areas in April-June None—no serpentine known in Hamilton harebell Endemic to the Mt. Hamilton range chaparral, 1,600-3,000 feet. the area Campanula sharsmithiae Succulent owl’s-clover T/E/1B.2 Fresno, Madera, Merced, Mariposa, Vernal pools between 165 and April-May Moderate San Joaquin, and Stanislaus counties. 2,500 feet. Castilleja campestris ssp. succulenta California jewel-flower E/E/1B.1 Historically common in western San Sandy or loamy soils in annual February-May Moderate Joaquin Valley and interior foothills, grassland, chenopod scrub, Caulanthus californicus currently at scattered locations in pinyon-juniper woodland. Fresno, Kern, San Luis Obispo and Santa Barbara counties. Lemmon’s jewel-flower –/–/1B.2 Western Central Valley and valleys of Pinyon and juniper woodland, and March-May Low adjacent foothills on west side of valley and foothill grassland, Caulanthus coulteri var. Central Valley. between 250 and 4,000 feet. lemmonii Table E-1. Continued Page 3 of 8 Statusa: Common and Federal/State/ Blooming Potential for Occurrence in Scientific Name CNPS Distribution Preferred Habitats Period the General Plan Areab Parry’s rough tarplant –/–/4.2 Butte, Colusa, Glenn, Lake, Merced, Alkaline, vernally mesic areas, May-October Low Sacramento, San Joaquin, Solano, seeps, and roadsides in vernal Centromadia parryi ssp. Sutter, and Yolo counties. pools and valley and foothill rudis grassland. Hoover’s spurge T/–/1B.2 Central Valley from Butte County to Below the high-water marks of July-October Moderate Tulare County. large northern hardpan and Chamaesyce hooveri volcanic vernal pools, vernal [Euphorbia hooveri] pools in valley grassland, freshwater wetlands, and wetland- riparian areas below 80-800 feet. Mt. Hamilton thistle –/–/1B.2 Mt. Hamilton Range, eastern San Freshwater seeps and streams on February- None—no serpentine known in Francisco Bay area: Alameda, Santa serpentine outcrops, chaparral, October the area Cirsium fontinale var. Clara, and Stanislaus counties. cismontane woodland, valley and campylon foothill grassland, 1000-3,000 feet Beaked clarkia –/–/1B.3 Merced, Mariposa, and Stanislaus Cismontane woodland, Valley April-May Moderate Counties. Central Sierra Nevada and foothill grassland, 200-1,500 Clarkia rostrata Foothills, San Joaquin Valley, Hell feet. Hollow, and Merced River drainage: Small-flowered morning –/–/4.2 San Joaquin Valley, central western Chaparral openings, coastal March-July None—no serpentine known in glory and southwestern California, southern scrub, valley and foothill the area Channel Islands; Baja California grassland, on clay soils in Convolvulus simulans serpentine seeps, 100-2,300 feet. Mt. Hamilton coreopsis –/–/1B.2 Eastern San Francisco Bay, Santa Steep shale talus slopes of March-May None—no talus slopes in the Clara, and Stanislaus counties. cismontane woodland between area Coreopsis hamiltonii 1,800-4,200 feet. Hoover’s cryptantha –/–/1A Northern and central San Joaquin Coarse, sandy, soil, inland dunes April-May Moderate Valley. Alameda, Contra Costa, Kern, in valley and foothill grassland Cryptantha hooveri Madera, Merced, San Joaquin, and between 30 and 500 feet. Stanislaus counties. Table E-1. Continued Page 4 of 8 Statusa: Common and Federal/State/ Blooming Potential for Occurrence in Scientific Name CNPS Distribution Preferred Habitats Period the General Plan Areab Recurved larkspur –/–/1B.2 Central Valley from Colusa* to Kern Alkaline soils in valley and March-June Moderate Counties. foothill grassland, saltbush scrub, Delphinium recurvatum cismontane woodland; below 2,500 feet. Dwarf downingia –/–/2B.2 Central Valley extending from Vernal pools and valley and March-May Moderate Amador to San Joaquin Counties. foothill grasslands below 1,500 Downingia pusilla feet. Santa Clara Valley dudleya E/–/1B.1 Santa Clara County, Stanislaus County Rocky, serpentine substrates in April-October Low- no serpentine known in (USFWS County list only). cismontane woodland and valley the area Dudleya abramsii ssp. and foothill grassland, 200- 1,500 setchellii [Dudleya feet. setchellii] Tracy’s eriastrum –/CR/3.2 Colusa, Fresno, Glenn, Lake, Santa Chaparral and cismontane May-July Low Clara, Shasta, Stanislaus, Tehama, woodland between 1,000-5,400 Eriastrum tracyi Trinity, and Tulare counties. feet. Delta button-celery –/E/1B.1 San Joaquin River delta, floodplains, Riparian scrub, seasonally June-October High and adjacent Sierra Nevada foothills: inundated depressions along Eryngium racemosum Calaveras, Merced, San Joaquin*, and floodplains on clay soils, below Stanislaus Counties 100 feet. Spiny-sepaled button- –/–/1B.2 Fresno, Madera, Stanislaus, Tulare, Valley and foothill grasslands and April-June Moderate celery and Tuolumne counties. vernal pools, between 260 and 2,000 feet. Eryngium spinosepalum Diamond-petaled –/–/1B.1 Interior foothills of south Coast Grassland, chenopod scrub, on March-April Moderate California poppy Ranges from Contra Costa County to clay soils, where grass cover is Stanislaus County. Carrizo Plain in sparse enough to allow growth of Eschscholzia rhombipetala San Luis Obispo County. low annuals below 3,200 feet. Talus fritillary –/–/1B.2 South inner coast ranges. Alameda, Chaparral, oak woodland, closed- March-May None—no serpentine known in Monterey, San Benito, Santa Clara, cone coniferous forest, on the area Fritillaria falcata and Stanislaus counties. serpentine talus between 1,000- 5,000 feet. Table E-1. Continued Page 5 of 8 Statusa: Common and Federal/State/ Blooming Potential for Occurrence in Scientific Name CNPS Distribution Preferred Habitats Period the General Plan Areab Legenere –/–/1B.1 Primarily located in the lower Deep, seasonally wet habitats May-June Moderate Sacramento Valley, also from north
Load more

Recommended publications
  • "National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary."
    Intro 1996 National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands The Fish and Wildlife Service has prepared a National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary (1996 National List). The 1996 National List is a draft revision of the National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1988 National Summary (Reed 1988) (1988 National List). The 1996 National List is provided to encourage additional public review and comments on the draft regional wetland indicator assignments. The 1996 National List reflects a significant amount of new information that has become available since 1988 on the wetland affinity of vascular plants. This new information has resulted from the extensive use of the 1988 National List in the field by individuals involved in wetland and other resource inventories, wetland identification and delineation, and wetland research. Interim Regional Interagency Review Panel (Regional Panel) changes in indicator status as well as additions and deletions to the 1988 National List were documented in Regional supplements. The National List was originally developed as an appendix to the Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States (Cowardin et al.1979) to aid in the consistent application of this classification system for wetlands in the field.. The 1996 National List also was developed to aid in determining the presence of hydrophytic vegetation in the Clean Water Act Section 404 wetland regulatory program and in the implementation of the swampbuster provisions of the Food Security Act. While not required by law or regulation, the Fish and Wildlife Service is making the 1996 National List available for review and comment.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Rare Plants Report
    Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Biological Monitoring Program 2019 Rare Plant Survey Report Brand’s Phacelia (Phacelia stellaris) Little mousetail (Myosurus minimus ) 21 April 2020 i 2019 Rare Plant Survey Report TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 1 Goals and Objectives .......................................................................................................... 1 Methods .............................................................................................................................. 2 Protocol Development ........................................................................................................ 2 Survey Methods .................................................................................................................. 2 Training ............................................................................................................................... 3 Data Analysis ...................................................................................................................... 4 Results ................................................................................................................................. 5 Targeted Surveys ................................................................................................................ 5 Species with Additional Requirements ..............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 3.4 Biological Resources for the Purpose of This EIR, Biological Resources Comprise Vegetation, Wildlife, Natural Communities, and Wetlands and Other Waters
    Impact Analysis Alameda County Community Development Agency Biological Resources 3.4 Biological Resources For the purpose of this EIR, biological resources comprise vegetation, wildlife, natural communities, and wetlands and other waters. Potential biological resource impacts associated with the program and the two individual projects are analyzed. Potential impacts are described quantitatively and qualitatively in Section 3.4.2, Environmental Impacts. This section also identifies specific and detailed measures to avoid, minimize, or compensate for potentially significant impacts on biological resources, where necessary. 3.4.1 Existing Conditions Regulatory Setting Federal Endangered Species Act Pursuant to the federal Endangered Species Act (ESA), USFWS and the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) have authority over projects that may result in take of a species listed as threatened or endangered under the act. Take is defined under the ESA, in part, as killing, harming, or harassing. Under federal regulations, take is further defined to include habitat modification or degradation that results, or is reasonably expected to result, in death or injury to wildlife by significantly impairing essential behavioral patterns, including breeding, feeding, or sheltering. If a likelihood exists that a project would result in take of a federally listed species, either an incidental take permit, under Section 10(a) of the ESA, or a federal interagency consultation, under Section 7 of the ESA, is required. Several federally listed species—vernal pool fairy shrimp (Branchinecta lynchi), longhorn fairy shrimp (Branchinecta longiantenna), vernal pool tadpole shrimp (Lepidurus packardi), California tiger salamander (Ambystoma californiense), California red‐legged frog (Rana draytonii), Alameda whipsnake (Masticophis lateralis euryxanthus), and San Joaquin kit fox (Vulpes macrotis mutica)—have the potential to be affected by activities associated with the Golden Hills and Patterson Pass projects as well as subsequent repowering projects.
    [Show full text]
  • Tidal Marsh Recovery Plan Habitat Creation Or Enhancement Project Within 5 Miles of OAK
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Recovery Plan for Tidal Marsh Ecosystems of Northern and Central California California clapper rail Suaeda californica Cirsium hydrophilum Chloropyron molle Salt marsh harvest mouse (Rallus longirostris (California sea-blite) var. hydrophilum ssp. molle (Reithrodontomys obsoletus) (Suisun thistle) (soft bird’s-beak) raviventris) Volume II Appendices Tidal marsh at China Camp State Park. VII. APPENDICES Appendix A Species referred to in this recovery plan……………....…………………….3 Appendix B Recovery Priority Ranking System for Endangered and Threatened Species..........................................................................................................11 Appendix C Species of Concern or Regional Conservation Significance in Tidal Marsh Ecosystems of Northern and Central California….......................................13 Appendix D Agencies, organizations, and websites involved with tidal marsh Recovery.................................................................................................... 189 Appendix E Environmental contaminants in San Francisco Bay...................................193 Appendix F Population Persistence Modeling for Recovery Plan for Tidal Marsh Ecosystems of Northern and Central California with Intial Application to California clapper rail …............................................................................209 Appendix G Glossary……………......................................................................………229 Appendix H Summary of Major Public Comments and Service
    [Show full text]
  • 4.9 Biological Resources
    METROPOLITAN BAKERSFIELD METROPOLITAN BAKERSFIELD GENERAL PLAN UPDATE EIR 4.9 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES The purpose of this Section is to identify existing biological resources within the Metropolitan Bakersfield area. In addition, this Section provides an assessment of biological resources (including sensitive species) impacts that may result from implementation of the General Plan Update references General Plan goals and policies, and, where necessary, recommends mitigation measures to reduce the significance of impacts. This Section describes the biological character of the site in terms of vegetation, flora, wildlife, and wildlife habitats and analyzes the biological significance of the site in view of Federal, State and local laws and policies. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING The study area for the Metropolitan Bakersfield General Plan Update encompasses 408 square miles of the southern portion of the San Joaquin Valley, the southernmost basin of the Central Valley of California. Prior to industrial, agricultural and urban development, the San Joaquin Valley comprised a variety of ecological communities. Runoff from the surrounding mountains fostered hardwood and riparian forests, marshes and grassland communities. Away from the influence of the mountain runoff, several distinct dryland communities of grasses and shrubs developed along gradients of rainfall, soil texture and soil alkalinity, providing a mosaic of habitats for the assemblage of endemic plants and animals. Agriculture, urban development and oil/gas extraction have resulted in many changes in the natural environment of the San Joaquin Valley. For example, lakes and wetlands in the delta area have been drained and diverted, native plant and animal species have been lost and a decrease in the acreage of native lands has occurred.
    [Show full text]
  • November 2009 an Analysis of Possible Risk To
    Project Title An Analysis of Possible Risk to Threatened and Endangered Plant Species Associated with Glyphosate Use in Alfalfa: A County-Level Analysis Authors Thomas Priester, Ph.D. Rick Kemman, M.S. Ashlea Rives Frank, M.Ent. Larry Turner, Ph.D. Bernalyn McGaughey David Howes, Ph.D. Jeffrey Giddings, Ph.D. Stephanie Dressel Data Requirements Pesticide Assessment Guidelines Subdivision E—Hazard Evaluation: Wildlife and Aquatic Organisms Guideline Number 70-1-SS: Special Studies—Effects on Endangered Species Date Completed August 22, 2007 Prepared by Compliance Services International 7501 Bridgeport Way West Lakewood, WA 98499-2423 (253) 473-9007 Sponsor Monsanto Company 800 N. Lindbergh Blvd. Saint Louis, MO 63167 Project Identification Compliance Services International Study 06711 Monsanto Study ID CS-2005-125 RD 1695 Volume 3 of 18 Page 1 of 258 Threatened & Endangered Plant Species Analysis CSI 06711 Glyphosate/Alfalfa Monsanto Study ID CS-2005-125 Page 2 of 258 STATEMENT OF NO DATA CONFIDENTIALITY CLAIMS The text below applies only to use of the data by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) in connection with the provisions of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) No claim of confidentiality is made for any information contained in this study on the basis of its falling within the scope of FIFRA §10(d)(1)(A), (B), or (C). We submit this material to the United States Environmental Protection Agency specifically under the requirements set forth in FIFRA as amended, and consent to the use and disclosure of this material by EPA strictly in accordance with FIFRA. By submitting this material to EPA in accordance with the method and format requirements contained in PR Notice 86-5, we reserve and do not waive any rights involving this material that are or can be claimed by the company notwithstanding this submission to EPA.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix D Species Accounts Appendix D Species Accounts
    Appendix D Species Accounts Appendix D Species Accounts Table of Contents San Joaquin Spearscale (Atriplex joaquiniana) ...................................................... 1 Recurved Larkspur (Delphinium recurvatum) ........................................................ 4 Big Tarplant (Blepharizonia plumosa) .................................................................... 6 Congdon’s Tarplant (Centromadia parryi ssp. congdonii) ..................................... 8 Palmate-bracted bird’s-beak (Cordylanthus palmatus) ....................................... 10 Livermore tarplant (Deinandra bacigalupii) ........................................................ 11 Longhorn Fairy Shrimp ......................................................................................... 12 Vernal Pool Fairy Shrimp ..................................................................................... 15 Callippe Silverspot Butterfly ................................................................................ 18 California Tiger Salamander ................................................................................. 21 California Red-Legged Frog .................................................................................. 25 Foothill yellow-legged frog .................................................................................. 28 Alameda Whipsnake ............................................................................................ 31 Central California Coast Steelhead .....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Sacramento Fish & Wildlife Office
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Sacramento Fish & Wildlife Office Species Account CALIFORNIA JEWELFLOWER Caulanthus californicus CLASSIFICATION: Endangered Federal Register 55:29361; July 19, 1990 http://ecos.fws.gov/docs/federal_register/fr1729.pdf (3.5 MB) STATE LISTING STATUS AND CNPS CODE: This species was listed as endangered by the California Department of Fish and Game in January 1987. The California Native Plant Society has placed it on List 1B (rare or endangered throughout its range). CRITICAL HABITAT : None designated RECOVERY PLAN : Recovery Plan for Upland Species of the San Joaquin Valley, California 1998 http://ecos.fws.gov/docs/recovery_plan/980930a.pdf 5-YEAR REVIEW : Initiated 2006 California Jewelflower http://ecos.fws.gov/docs/federal_register/fr5047.pdf Rosalie Faubion U.S. Bureau of Reclamation DESCRIPTION: California jewelflower, is an annual herb in the mustard family (Brassicaceae). Erect, hairless stems, which are usually branching, range from less than 10 centimeters (4 inches) to more than 50 centimeters (20 inches) tall. They produce several flowering branches. The leaves are wavy-margined and most are in a basal rosette. Upper leaves are egg-shaped and clasp the stem, unlike the leaves at the base of the plant, California Jewelflower Habitat © 2009 Dr. Dean W. Taylor which are oblong. Maroon buds clustered at the tip Jepson Herbarium of the stem contrast with translucent, white flowers below. Seeds begin to germinate in the fall, and seedlings may continue to emerge for several months. The seedlings develop into rosettes of leaves during winter months, after which stems elongate and flower buds appear in February or March, blooming as late as May if rainfall and temperatures are favorable.
    [Show full text]
  • Botanical Priority Guidebook
    Botanical Priority Protection Areas Alameda and Contra Costa Counties the East Bay Regional Park District. However, certain BPPAs include Hills have been from residential development. public parcels or properties with other conservation status. These are cases where land has been conserved since the creation of these boundaries or where potential management decisions have the poten- Following this initial mapping effort, the East Bay Chap- \ ntroduction tial to negatively affect an area’s botanical resources. Additionally, ter’s Conservation Committee began to utilize the con- each acre within these BPPAs represents a potential area of high pri- cept in draft form in key local planning efforts. Lech ority. Both urban and natural settings are included within these Naumovich, the chapter’s Conservation Analyst staff The lands that comprise the East Bay Chapter are located at the convergence boundaries, therefore, they are intended to be considered as areas person, showcased the map set in forums such as the of the San Francisco Bay, the North and South Coast Ranges, the Sacra- warranting further scrutiny due to the abundance of nearby sensitive BAOSC’s Upland Habitat Goals Project and the Green mento-San Joaquin Delta, and the San Joaquin Valley. The East Bay Chapter botanical resources supported by high quality habitat within each E A S T B A Y Vision Group (in association with Greenbelt Alliance); area supports a unique congregation of ecological conditions and native BPPA. Although a parcel, available for preservation through fee title C N P S East Bay Regional Park District’s Master Plan Process; plants. Based on historic botanical collections, the pressures from growth- purchase or conservation easement, may be located within the and local municipalities.
    [Show full text]
  • Demography of Caulanthus Californicus, Lembertia Congdonii
    EAGEE A OGAM DEMOGRAPHY OF CAUAUS CAIOICUS, EMEIA COGOII, AND EIASUM OOE, AND VEGETATION CHARACTERISTICS OF ENDANGERED SPECIES POPULATIONS IN THE SOUTHERN SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY AND THE CARRIZO PLAIN NATURAL AREA IN 1993 FINAL REPORT SUBMITTED BY: Ellen Cypher San Joaquin Valley Endangered Species ey Recovery Planning Program 2727 North Grove Industrial Drive, Suite 125 Co( o51 Fresno, CA 93727 (209) 453-1103 11 v\D SUBMITTED TO: Deborah Hillyard California Department of Fish and Game Natural Heritage Division 1416 9th Street Sacramento, CA 95814-2090 FUNDED BY: Emergency Drought Relief Project Contract No. CA HER 031293 23 May 1994 • ABSTRACT Populations of two endangered and one threatened plant species were studied on the Carrizo Plain Natural Area (CPNA) and in the San Joaquin Valley of California in order to provide baseline data for continuing research on their ecology and responses to drought and site management. Results will be incorporated into a multi-species recovery plan as well as restoration and management plans for the CPNA and other preserves. In terms of plant size and reproduction, the most successful populations of Caulanthus caqomicus were those on the CPNA, whereas Lembertia congdonii was equally successful on the CPNA and in the Kettleman Hills. Of the four Eriastrum hooveri sites studied, plants on the CPNA were smallest with poorest reproduction. Grazing effects were compared in three populations of L. congdonii, each of which was divided into grazed and ungrazed portions. Reproduction of L. congdonii was greater in grazed than in ungrazed areas of the Carrizo Plain and Kettleman Hills, whereas the reverse was found on the Elkhorn Plain.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenies and Secondary Chemistry in Arnica (Asteraceae)
    Digital Comprehensive Summaries of Uppsala Dissertations from the Faculty of Science and Technology 392 Phylogenies and Secondary Chemistry in Arnica (Asteraceae) CATARINA EKENÄS ACTA UNIVERSITATIS UPSALIENSIS ISSN 1651-6214 UPPSALA ISBN 978-91-554-7092-0 2008 urn:nbn:se:uu:diva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ist of Papers This thesis is based on the following papers, which are referred to in the text by their Roman numerals: I Ekenäs, C., B. G. Baldwin, and K. Andreasen. 2007. A molecular phylogenetic
    [Show full text]
  • USGS DDS-43, Status of Rare and Endemic Plants
    JAMES R. SHEVOCK U.S. Forest Service Pacific Southwest Region San Francisco, California 24 Status of Rare and Endemic Plants ABSTRACT The Sierra Nevada represents nearly 20% of the California land base INTRODUCTION yet contains over 50% of the state’s flora. Approximately 405 vascu- For more than 100 years, the flora of the Sierra Nevada has lar plant taxa are endemic to the Sierra Nevada. Of this total, 218 fascinated botanists even beyond the borders of the United taxa are considered rare by conservation organizations and/or state States. Visions of Yosemite, giant sequoias, and extensive and federal agencies. In addition, 168 other rare taxa have at least mixed conifer forests have added to an awareness of this one occurrence in the Sierra Nevada. Five monotypic genera are magnificent mountain range. The Sierra Nevada, part of the endemic to the Sierra Nevada (Bolandra, Carpenteria, Orochaenactis, California Floristic Province, is characterized by high rates of Phalacoseris, and Sequoiadendron). Information on rarity and ende- plant endemism (Stebbins and Major 1965; Raven and Axelrod mism for lichens and bryophytes for the Sierra Nevada is very specu- 1978; Messick 1995). For most of this century, plant collecting lative and fragmentary due to limited fieldwork and the small number and floristic research remained the pursuits of professional of available collections. Two mosses are endemic to the Sierra Ne- botanists with ties to major scientific and educational centers vada. Parameters obtained for each rare and/or endemic taxon in- (Shevock and Taylor 1987). Floristic studies have as one of clude habitat type and distributions by county, river basin, and their primary goals documentation of all the taxa (species, topographic quadrangle.
    [Show full text]