Landscape and Visual Appraisal Ernleye Meadows, Pearl Lane, Stourport-On-Severn January 2021
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Landscape and Visual Appraisal Ernleye Meadows, Pearl Lane, Stourport-on-Severn January 2021 2469/R07/LVA/EF/RH Birmingham • Cotswolds • Exeter • London • Manchester Report No. Date Author / Checked 2469/R07 08/01/2021 EF/RH Contents Plans Section 1: Introduction and Site Context 1 2469/P01: Plan 1: Site Location Section 2: Policy Context 4 2469/P09: Plan 2: Site Context Section 3: Landscape and Visual Baseline 8 2469/P10: Plan 3: Policy Section 4: Visual Study 16 2469/P11: Plan 4: Landscape Character Section 5: Development Proposals 27 2469/P12: Plan 5: Topography Section 6: Implications of Development 29 2469/P13: Plan 6: ZTV Section 7: Conclusion 31 2469/P14: Plan 7: Viewpoint Location 2469/P15: Plan 8: Visual Field 2469/P16: Plan 9: Opportunities and Constraints 2469/P17: Plan 10: Landscape Strategy This report, all plans, illustrations, and other associated material remains the property of Tyler Grange Group Ltd until paid for in full. Copyright and intellectual property rights remain with Tyler Grange Group Ltd. The contents of this report are valid at the time of writing. Tyler Grange shall not be liable for any use of this report other than for the purposes for which it was produced. Owing to the dynamic nature of ecological, landscape, and arboricultural resources, if more than twelve months have elapsed since the date of this report, further advice must be taken before you rely on the contents of this report. Notwithstanding any provision of the Tyler Grange Group Ltd Terms & Conditions, Tyler Grange Group Ltd shall not be liable for any losses (howsoever incurred) arising as a result of reliance by the client or any third party on this report more than 12 months after the date of this report. 1 Introduction and Site Context Background Plan 1: Site Location (2469/P09) 1.1 Tyler Grange have been appointed by Barratt West Midlands to provide landscape consultancy services in relation to the Site Boundary planning application for the development of up to 331 dwellings on land at Pearl Lane, Sourport-on-Severn. Site Context 1.2 The site location and its surroundings are illustrated on Plan 1: Site Location. 1.3 The site is located within the parish of Dunley, on the western settlement edge of Astley Cross, and within the administrative boundaries of the Wyre Forest District. 1.4 The western edge of Stourport-on-Severn and the site area sit within an area of rolling topography, that rises from the lower lying land adjacent to the River Severn, forming a crescent shaped bowl of rolling hills to the north, west and south. The landform across the site slopes up from 40m AOD in the south to 50m AOD in the north where it forms a plateau for much of the northern area. 1.5 The topography and rising landform across the site generally reflects that to the east upon which the adjacent settlement edge is built. To the southwest of the site, the land begins to slope up again towards the hillside beyond. 1.6 The site covers approximately 15.07 hectares of arable fields surrounded on all four sides by native hedgerows and a 5-10m wide tree belt comprising predominantly semi-mature Silver Birch and Scots Pine. An established hedgerow including scattered mature Oak trees delineate the remnant field pattern across the site. There are also portions of metal estate fencing remaining on site following sections of the field boundaries. A single free standing oak tree is situated within a field to the south of the site. Ernleye Meadows, Pearl Lane, Stourport-on-Severn 1 Landscape and Visual Appraisal 2469/R07/EF/RH/January 2021 1 Introduction and Site Context Plan 2: Site Context (2469/P10) Site Boundary Stourport on Severn Areley Wood Areley Kings Astley Cross River Severn Dunley Road/A451 Red House Road Dunley Ernleye Meadows, Pearl Lane, Stourport-on-Severn Landscape and Visual Appraisal 2 2469/R07/EF/RH/January 2021 1 Introduction and Site Context Methodology 1.7 This report has been undertaken in accordance with the following guidance: - An Approach to Landscape Character Assessment, Natural England, 2014; and - Guidelines for Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment(GLVIA), Third Edition, Landscape Institute and IEMA, 2013. 1.8 This is a standalone report and does not constitute a landscape chapter in the context of an Environmental Statement (ES) required by an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA). 1.9 Table 3.1 of the GLVIA3 outlines what is required in this type of appraisal report, as a project outside of an EIA. This includes the following: - Establish the existing nature of the landscape and visual environment in the study area; - Provides a description of the proposed development, identifying the main features of the proposals and the changes that will occur; and - Systematically identifies and describes the effects that are likely to occur, including whether they are adverse or beneficial. 1.10 The approach taken in the preparation of this report is considered to be appropriate and proportional in the context of the professional guidance published by the Landscape Institute. 1.11 Professional judgement plays an important role in the landscape and visual analysis process where the analysis of landscape character and visual amenity is both a subjective and objective process. However, the analysis process seeks to provide a narrative to explain the judgement reached. Ernleye Meadows, Pearl Lane, Stourport-on-Severn 3 Landscape and Visual Appraisal 2469/R07/EF/RH/January 2021 2 Policy Context National Planning Policy At paragraph 007 Reference ID: 26-007-20140306, it states: Are sympathetic to local character and history, including the “planning should promote local character (including landscape surrounding built environment and landscape setting, while not National Planning Policy Framework 2019 (NPPF) setting). Development should seek to promote character in preventing or discouraging appropriate innovation or change 2.1 At the heart of the NPPF is a presumption in favour of townscape and landscape by responding to and reinforcing (such as increased densities); sustainable development. For plan making the presumption locally distinctive patterns of developments, local man-made and requires plans to positively seek opportunities to meet the natural heritage and culture, while not preventing or discouraging Establish or maintain a strong sense of place, using the development needs of an area and be sufficiently flexible to appropriate innovation”. arrangement of streets, spaces, building types and materials to adapt to rapid change. Footnote 6 identifies protected areas or create attractive, welcoming and distinctive places to live, work assets of particular importance including: and visit; 2.8 The use of high quality hard and soft landscape design to help successfully integrate development into the wider environment is • Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI); Optimise the potential of the site to accommodate and sustain also emphasised as being important to consider from the outset, • Green Belt; an appropriate amount and mix of development (including green in order to ensure that proposals improve the overall quality of and other public space) and support local facilities and transport the townscape and landscape. • Local Green Space; networks; and Green Infrastructure • Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB); Create places that are safe, inclusive and accessible and which promote health and well-being, with a high standard of amenity for 2.9 The NPPG highlights the multifaceted benefits provided through • National Parks; existing and future users” the provision of Green Infrastructure, including but not limited to: “enhanced wellbeing, outdoor recreation and access, • Irreplaceable Habitats; 2.5 Paragraph 170 requires planning policies and decisions to enhanced biodiversity and landscapes, urban cooling, and the contribute to and enhance the natural and local environment by management of flood risk” (Paragraph: 005 Reference ID: 8-005- • Heritage Coasts; fulfilling criteria including amongst others: 20190721). “protecting and enhancing valued landscapes, sites of biodiversity • Designated Heritage Assets; and or geological value and soils (in a manner commensurate with 2.10 Moreover, the NPPG recognises how green infrastructure their statutory status or identified quality in the development plan); exists within a wider landscape context and can thus be used to • Areas at Risk of Flooding or Coastal Erosion. reinforce and enhance local landscape character and contribute to a sense of place. 2.2 Paragraph 12 of the NPPF clarifies that the presumption in recognising the intrinsic character and beauty of the countryside, favour of sustainable development does not change the status of and the wider benefits from natural capital and ecosystem the development plan as the starting point for decision making. services – including the economic and other benefits of the best Landscape and most versatile agricultural land, and of trees and woodland.” Furthermore, it confirms that where a planning application 2.11 The NPPG makes reference to the National Planning Policy conflicts with an up-to-date development plan (including any Framework, stating: “it is clear that plans should recognise National Planning Practice Guidance neighbourhood plans that form part of the development plan), the intrinsic character and beauty of the countryside, and that permission should not usually be granted. Local planning 2.6 The NPPG considers that the creation of new residential strategic policies should provide for the conservation and authorities may take decisions that depart from an up-to-date neighbourhoods can, through sensitive design, be deemed enhancement of landscapes” (Paragraph: 036 Reference ID: development plan, but only if material considerations in a acceptable even where it results in a loss of open countryside. 8-036-20190721). particular case indicate that the plan should not be followed. Those categories within the NPPG that are of particular relevance to landscape and visual matters in relation to this site 2.12 It is therefore emphasised that the cumulative impacts 2.3 The creation of high quality buildings and places is fundamental are set out below.