DOCSLIB.ORG

Wisconsin's Water Quality

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources Water Quality Bureau Division of Environmental Management EGAD #: 3200-2020-13 dnr.wi.gov 101 S Webster Street, PO Box 7921, Madison, WI 53707-7921 Wisconsin’s 2020 Water Quality Report to Congress i Governor Tony Evers Natural Resources Board Dr. Frederick Prehn, Chair Gregory Kazmierski, Vice-Chair Julie Anderson, Secretary William Bruins Terry Hilgenberg Bill Smith Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources Preston D. Cole, Secretary Beth Bier, Deputy Secretary Todd Ambs, Assistant Deputy Secretary Environmental Management Division Darsi Foss, Administrator Jim Zellmer, Deputy Administrator Adrian Stocks, Director, Water Quality Steve Galarneau, Director, Office of Great Waters Steve Elmore, Director, Drinking Water & Groundwater External Services Division Dave Siebert, Division Administrator Brian Weigel, Director, Watershed Management Michael Thompson, Director, Waterways Fish, Wildlife, & Parks Division Scott Loomans, Division Administrator Justine Hasz, Director, Fisheries Management Wisconsin’s 2020 Water Quality Report to Congress ii Wisconsin’s Water Quality Report The Federal Clean Water Act (CWA) requires all states to prepare a Water Quality Report to Congress every two years. This “Integrated Report” combines the CWA sections 305(b), 303(d), and 314. The report contains an overall summary of water quality conditions in the State and an updated Impaired Waters List. Wisconsin data are also provided electronically to the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as part of the Integrated Reporting Process. Wisconsin’s 2020 Wisconsin Water Quality Report to Congress summarizes assessment progress and activities related to water quality protection during the past two years. This document is an online publication only that can be accessed at the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (WDNR) website: dnr.wi.gov Cover photo: Popple River in Florence County (2015). Taken by Luke Ernster. Editor: Ashley Beranek Authors and contributors of this report include: Tim Asplund, Jim Amrhein, Brian Austin, Kendra Axness, Ashley Beranek, Dave Bolha, Camille Bruhn, Heidi Bunk, Jeanne Cargill, Jacob Dickmann, Donalea Dinsmore, Mary Gansberg, Melissa Gibson, Kevin Gauthier, Shawn Giblin, Sue Graham, Ilana Haimes, Macaulay Haller, Mark Hazuga, Katie Hein, Craig Helker, Lisa Helmuth, Andy Hudak, Sally Jarosz, Ted Johnson, Kevin Kirsch, Jon Kleist, Jim Klosiewski, Jim Killian, Jim Kreitlow, Jim Lemke, Jodi Lepsch, Mary Anne Lowndes, Madeline Magee, Keith Marquardt, Aaron Marti, Kristi Minahan, Brenda Nordin, Kimberly Oldenborg, Patrick Oldenburg, Emily Punke, Kristen Rathbun, Mark Riedel, Craig Roesler, Rachel Sabre, Mike Shupryt, Paul Skawinski, Alex Smith, Mike Sorge, Pam Toshner, Jean Unmuth, and all Water Quality Biologists, Water Resources Specialists, and Water Program Managers. All photos courtesy of Wisconsin DNR unless otherwise credited. Previous reports were published in 2018, 2016, 2014 (online only), 2012 (online only), 2010, 2008 (data submittal only), 2006, 2004, 2002, 2000, 1996, 1994, 1992, 1990, 1988, 1987, and earlier. WDNR’s earlier documents are available for review at the GEF II building, 101 S. Webster Street, Madison. Later versions are available electronically. Wisconsin’s 2020 Water Quality Report to Congress iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction .................................................................................................................................................................................. 1 Key Findings ............................................................................................................................................................................. 2 Wisconsin’s Water Quality .......................................................................................................................................................... 3 Total Waters .............................................................................................................................................................................. 3 Data Used for Assessments .................................................................................................................................................... 3 WDNR Data ......................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Public Data ............................................................................................................................................................................ 3 Assessment Methodology ....................................................................................................................................................... 4 New List Definitions ........................................................................................................................................................... 4 2020 Water Condition Lists .................................................................................................................................................... 5 Impaired Waters List ........................................................................................................................................................... 6 Restoration Waters List ....................................................................................................................................................... 8 Healthy Waters List .............................................................................................................................................................. 9 New Pollutant Listings .......................................................................................................................................................... 10 Protection TMDLs ............................................................................................................................................................. 12 Northeast Lakeshore TMDL Development .................................................................................................................. 13 Pollutant Identification ...................................................................................................................................................... 14 Watershed Restoration Plans ............................................................................................................................................ 14 Chloride ............................................................................................................................................................................... 15 Faxon Creek Source Study ................................................................................................................................................ 15 Beaches ................................................................................................................................................................................ 16 Degraded Biology ............................................................................................................................................................... 16 Contaminated Sediment Sites ........................................................................................................................................... 17 Coldwater Habitat .............................................................................................................................................................. 18 Pollutant Listing Removals ................................................................................................................................................... 19 Sediment Remediation Progress ...................................................................................................................................... 19 Water Quality Improvements ........................................................................................................................................... 21 List Cleanup ........................................................................................................................................................................ 23 Public Participation .................................................................................................................................................................... 26 Monitoring ............................................................................................................................................................................... 26 Water Action Volunteers .................................................................................................................................................. 26 Citizen Lake Monitoring Network .................................................................................................................................. 28 Wisconsin’s 2020 Water Quality Report to Congress iv Aquatic Invasive Species ................................................................................................................................................... 29 Data Solicitation ..................................................................................................................................................................... 30 Comment Period ...................................................................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Central Sand Hills Ecological Landscape

    Central Sand Hills Ecological Landscape

    Chapter 9 Central Sand Hills Ecological Landscape Where to Find the Publication The Ecological Landscapes of Wisconsin publication is available online, in CD format, and in limited quantities as a hard copy. Individual chapters are available for download in PDF format through the Wisconsin DNR website (http://dnr.wi.gov/, keyword “landscapes”). The introductory chapters (Part 1) and supporting materials (Part 3) should be downloaded along with individual ecological landscape chapters in Part 2 to aid in understanding and using the ecological landscape chapters. In addition to containing the full chapter of each ecological landscape, the website highlights key information such as the ecological landscape at a glance, Species of Greatest Conservation Need, natural community management opportunities, general management opportunities, and ecological landscape and Landtype Association maps (Appendix K of each ecological landscape chapter). These web pages are meant to be dynamic and were designed to work in close association with materials from the Wisconsin Wildlife Action Plan as well as with information on Wisconsin’s natural communities from the Wisconsin Natural Heritage Inventory Program. If you have a need for a CD or paper copy of this book, you may request one from Dreux Watermolen, Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, P.O. Box 7921, Madison, WI 53707. Photos (L to R): Karner blue butterfly, photo by Gregor Schuurman, Wisconsin DNR; small white lady’s-slipper, photo by Drew Feldkirchner, Wisconsin DNR; ornate box turtle, photo by Rori Paloski, Wisconsin DNR; Fassett’s locoweed, photo by Thomas Meyer, Wisconsin DNR; spatterdock darner, photo by David Marvin. Suggested Citation Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources.
  • IMPORTANT INFORMATION: Lakes with an Asterisk * Do Not Have Depth Information and Appear with Improvised Contour Lines County Information Is for Reference Only

    IMPORTANT INFORMATION: Lakes with an Asterisk * Do Not Have Depth Information and Appear with Improvised Contour Lines County Information Is for Reference Only

    IMPORTANT INFORMATION: Lakes with an asterisk * do not have depth information and appear with improvised contour lines County information is for reference only. Your lake will not be split up by county. The whole lake will be shown unless specified next to name ex (Northern Section) (Near Follette) etc. LAKE NAME COUNTY COUNTY COUNTY COUNTY COUNTY GL Great Lakes Great Lakes GL Lake Erie Great Lakes GL Lake Erie (Port of Toledo) Great Lakes GL Lake Erie (Western Basin) Great Lakes GL Lake Erie with Lake Ontario Great Lakes GL Lake Erie (Eastern Section, Mentor to Buffalo) Great Lakes GL Lake Huron Great Lakes GL Lake Huron (w West Lake Erie) Great Lakes GL Lake Michigan Great Lakes GL Lake Michigan (Northeast) Great Lakes GL Lake Michigan (South) Great Lakes GL Lake Michigan (w Lake Erie and Lake Huron) Great Lakes GL Lake Ontario Great Lakes GL Lake Ontario (Rochester Area) Great Lakes GL Lake Ontario (Stoney Pt to Wolf Island) Great Lakes GL Lake Superior Great Lakes GL Lake Superior (w Lake Michigan and Lake Huron) Great Lakes GL (MI) Lake St Clair Great Lakes AL Cedar Creek Reservoir Franklin AL Deerwood Lake Shelby AL Dog River Mobile AL Gantt Lake Covington AL (GA) Goat Rock Lake * Lee Harris (GA) AL Guntersville Lake Marshall Jackson AL Highland Lake * Blount AL Inland Lake * Blount AL Jordan Lake Elmore AL Lake Gantt * Covington AL (FL) Lake Jackson * Covington Walton (FL) AL Lake Martin Coosa Elmore Tallapoosa AL Lake Mitchell Chilton Coosa AL Lake Tuscaloosa Tuscaloosa AL Lake Wedowee (RL Harris Reservoir) Clay Randolph AL Lake
  • Depth Information Not Available for Lakes Marked with an Asterisk (*)

    Depth Information Not Available for Lakes Marked with an Asterisk (*)

    DEPTH INFORMATION NOT AVAILABLE FOR LAKES MARKED WITH AN ASTERISK (*) LAKE NAME COUNTY COUNTY COUNTY COUNTY GL Great Lakes Great Lakes GL Lake Erie Great Lakes GL Lake Erie (Port of Toledo) Great Lakes GL Lake Erie (Western Basin) Great Lakes GL Lake Huron Great Lakes GL Lake Huron (w West Lake Erie) Great Lakes GL Lake Michigan (Northeast) Great Lakes GL Lake Michigan (South) Great Lakes GL Lake Michigan (w Lake Erie and Lake Huron) Great Lakes GL Lake Ontario Great Lakes GL Lake Ontario (Rochester Area) Great Lakes GL Lake Ontario (Stoney Pt to Wolf Island) Great Lakes GL Lake Superior Great Lakes GL Lake Superior (w Lake Michigan and Lake Huron) Great Lakes AL Baldwin County Coast Baldwin AL Cedar Creek Reservoir Franklin AL Dog River * Mobile AL Goat Rock Lake * Chambers Lee Harris (GA) Troup (GA) AL Guntersville Lake Marshall Jackson AL Highland Lake * Blount AL Inland Lake * Blount AL Lake Gantt * Covington AL Lake Jackson * Covington Walton (FL) AL Lake Jordan Elmore Coosa Chilton AL Lake Martin Coosa Elmore Tallapoosa AL Lake Mitchell Chilton Coosa AL Lake Tuscaloosa Tuscaloosa AL Lake Wedowee Clay Cleburne Randolph AL Lay Lake Shelby Talladega Chilton Coosa AL Lay Lake and Mitchell Lake Shelby Talladega Chilton Coosa AL Lewis Smith Lake Cullman Walker Winston AL Lewis Smith Lake * Cullman Walker Winston AL Little Lagoon Baldwin AL Logan Martin Lake Saint Clair Talladega AL Mobile Bay Baldwin Mobile Washington AL Mud Creek * Franklin AL Ono Island Baldwin AL Open Pond * Covington AL Orange Beach East Baldwin AL Oyster Bay Baldwin AL Perdido Bay Baldwin Escambia (FL) AL Pickwick Lake Colbert Lauderdale Tishomingo (MS) Hardin (TN) AL Shelby Lakes Baldwin AL Walter F.
  • Water-Quality and Lake-Stage Data for Wisconsin Lakes, Water Year 2006

    Water-Quality and Lake-Stage Data for Wisconsin Lakes, Water Year 2006

    Water-Quality and Lake-Stage Data for Wisconsin Lakes, Water Year 2006 U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Open-File Report 2007–1173 Prepared in cooperation with the State of Wisconsin and local agencies U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Water-Quality and Lake-Stage Data for Wisconsin Lakes, Water Year 2006 A report by the Wisconsin Water Science Center Lake-Studies Team– W.J. Rose (team leader), H.S. Garn, G.L. Goddard, S.B. Marsh, D.L. Olson, and D.M. Robertson Open-File Report 2007–1173 Prepared in cooperation with the State of Wisconsin and with other agencies Middleton, Wisconsin 2007 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR DIRK KEMPTHORNE, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Mark D. Myers, Director For additional information write to: Copies of this report can be purchased from: Center Director U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Earth Science Information Center 8505 Research Way Open-File Reports Section Middleton, WI 53562 Box 25286, MS 517 Denver Federal Center Denver, CO 80225 iii CONTENTS Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................ 1 Methods of data collection ......................................................................................................................................... 4 Explanation of physical and chemical characteristics of lakes ................................................................................ 12 Water temperature and thermal stratification.............................................................................................
  • Context Statement for the Gloucester Subregion, PDF, 11.22 MB

    Context Statement for the Gloucester Subregion, PDF, 11.22 MB

    Context statement for the Gloucester subregion Product 1.1 from the Northern Sydney Basin Bioregional Assessment 28 May 2014 A scientific collaboration between the Department of the Environment, Bureau of Meteorology, CSIRO and Geoscience Australia The Bioregional Assessment Programme The Bioregional Assessment Programme is a transparent and accessible programme of baseline assessments that increase the available science for decision making associated with coal seam gas and large coal mines. A bioregional assessment is a scientific analysis of the ecology, hydrology, geology and hydrogeology of a bioregion with explicit assessment of the potential direct, indirect and cumulative impacts of coal seam gas and large coal mining development on water resources. This Programme draws on the best available scientific information and knowledge from many sources, including government, industry and regional communities, to produce bioregional assessments that are independent, scientifically robust, and relevant and meaningful at a regional scale. The Programme is funded by the Australian Government Department of the Environment. The Department of the Environment, Bureau of Meteorology, CSIRO and Geoscience Australia are collaborating to undertake bioregional assessments. For more information, visit <www.bioregionalassessments.gov.au>. Department of the Environment The Office of Water Science, within the Australian Government Department of the Environment, is strengthening the regulation of coal seam gas and large coal mining development by ensuring that future decisions are informed by substantially improved science and independent expert advice about the potential water related impacts of those developments. For more information, visit <www.environment.gov.au/coal-seam-gas-mining/>. Bureau of Meteorology The Bureau of Meteorology is Australia’s national weather, climate and water agency.
  • Give Fish a Chance in the Port Stephens – Great Lakes Marine Park

    Give Fish a Chance in the Port Stephens – Great Lakes Marine Park

    Give Fish a Chance in the Port Stephens – Great Lakes Marine Park The Give Fish a Chance campaign is designed to promote the need for a comprehensive, adequate and representative system of marine sanctuaries in the Port Stephens – Great Lakes Marine Park. This will require up to half of all key marine habitats and all Grey Nurse Shark key habitats to be protected in marine sanctuaries. You can support this campaign by making a submission to the Port Stephens – Great Lakes Marine Park draft zoning plan. The Marine Park Authority is asking for comments on the draft zoning plan before 23rd September 2006. We encourage you to ask the NSW Government to Give Fish a Chance by supporting additional sanctuary zones by filling in the submission form attached. A key requirement of marine parks is to protect marine wildlife yet some of the areas with the highest biodiversity have only been partly protected. For example, large areas of seagrass meadows, vital to protect juvenile fish, in the Myall River remain inadequately protected. For the marine park to protect fish so they can breed, feed and recover in numbers, it needs to provide marine sanctuaries for up to half of each habitat type, including rocky reefs, islands, seagrass and sand. Snapper Island and Boondaba Island in Port Stephens, for example, are areas that deserve to be fully protected. Perhaps most importantly, many of the critically endangered Grey Nurse Shark key habitat areas receive only partial protection. Latitude Rock near Forster, Edith Breakers at Seal Rocks and Little Broughton Island near Port Stephens will receive insufficient protection if the current zoning plan goes ahead.
  • Town of Newton Comprehensive Plan February 3, 2005 Ii

    Town of Newton Comprehensive Plan February 3, 2005 Ii

    Town of Newton Comprehensive Plan PLAN COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2004-1 ADOPTING AND RECOMMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR THE TOWN OF NEWTON IN MARQUETTE COUNTY, WISCONSIN WHEREAS, section 66.1001(4), Wisconsin Statutes, establishes the required procedure for a local government to adopt a comprehensive plan, and section 66.1001(2) identifies the required ele- ments of a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the Town of Newton Plan Commission has the authority to recommend that the Town Board adopt a “comprehensive plan” under section 66.1001(4)(b); and WHEREAS, the Town has prepared the attached document (named Town of Newton Compre- hensive Plan), containing all maps and other descriptive materials, to be the comprehensive plan for the Town under section 66.1001, Wisconsin Statutes; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Plan Commission of the Town of Newton hereby adopts the attached Comprehensive Plan as the Town’s comprehensive plan under sec- tion 66.1001(4), Wisconsin Statutes; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Secretary of the Plan Commission certifies a copy of the attached Comprehensive Plan to the Town Board; and BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED that the Plan Commission hereby recommends that, follow- ing a public hearing, the Town Board adopt an ordinance to constitute official Town approval of the Town of Newton Comprehensive Plan as the Town’s comprehensive plan under section 66.1001, Wiscon- sin Statutes. Adopted this 2nd day of December, 2004. Bruce Alexander, Plan Commission Chair Attest: Plan Commission Members: Ed Hell Roberta
  • Final TMDL Report

    Final TMDL Report

    Total Maximum Daily Loads for Total Phosphorus and Total Suspended Solids Upper Fox and Wolf Basins Final U.S. EPA approved Report Including Forest, Langlade, Menominee, Shawano, Outagamie, Waupaca, 02/27/2020 Winnebago, Waushara, Calumet, Fond Du Lac, Green Lake, Marquette, Columbia, Adams, Dodge, and Portage Counties, Wisconsin Prepared For: WI Department of U.S. Environmental Natural Resources Protection Agency 101 S. Webster St Region 5 PO Box 7921 77W.JacksonBlvd. Madison, WI 53707-7921 Chicago, IL 60604 Prepared By: The Cadmus Group LLC Finalized by the WI Department of Natural Resources Page intentionally left blank 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................................................ i Appendices ......................................................................................................................................................... iii LIST OF FIGURES ......................................................................................................................................... iv LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................................................................ v List of Acronyms .............................................................................................................................................. vi INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................
  • 1 Region 1 – Western US

    1 Region 1 – Western US

    ^ = Partial Bathymetric Coverage ! = New to/updated in 2011 blue = Vision Coverage * = Detailed Shoreline Only Region 1 – Western US Lake Name State County French Meadows Reservoir CA Placer Alamo Lake AZ La Paz Goose Lake CA Modoc * Bartlett Reservoir AZ Maricopa Harry L Englebright Lake CA Yuba Blue Ridge Reservoir AZ Coconino Hell Hole Reservoir CA Placer Horseshoe Reservoir AZ Yavapai Hensley Lake CA Madera Lake Havasu AZ/CA Various * Huntington Lake CA Fresno Lake Mohave AZ/NV Various Ice House Reservoir CA El Dorado Lake Pleasant AZ Yavapai/Maricopa Indian Valley Reservoir CA Lake Lower Lake Mary AZ Coconino * Jackson Meadow Reservoir CA Sierra San Carlos Reservoir AZ Various * Jenkinson Lake CA El Dorado Sunrise Lake AZ Apache Lake Almanor CA Plumas * Theodore Roosevelt Lake AZ Gila Lake Berryessa CA Napa Upper Lake Mary AZ Coconino Lake Britton CA Shasta Antelop Valley Reservoir CA Plumas ^ Lake Cachuma CA Santa Barbara Barrett Lake CA San Deigo Lake Casitas CA Ventura Beardsley Lake CA Tuolumne Lake Del Valle CA Alameda Black Butte Lake CA Glenn Lake Isabella CA Kern Briones Reservoir CA Contra Costa Lake Jennings CA San Deigo Bullards Bar Reservoir CA Yuba Lake Kaweah CA Tulare Camanche Reservoir CA Various Lake McClure CA Mariposa Caples Lake CA Alpine Lake Natoma CA Sacramento Castaic Lake CA Los Angeles Lake of the Pines CA Nevada Castle Lake CA Siskiyou Lake Oroville CA Butte ^ Clear Lake CA Lake Lake Piru CA Ventura ^ Clear Lake Reservoir CA Modoc * Lake Shasta CA Shasta Cogswell Reservoir CA Los Angeles Lake Sonoma CA
  • Karuah Catchment Management Plan

    Karuah Catchment Management Plan

    Karuah Catchment Management Plan - Community and Stakeholder Forum Forum Outcomes Report PCB Consulting July 2014 Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 1 Our Vision ................................................................................................................................................ 2 What we love about our Karuah River Catchment ............................................................................. 3 What we hope for from the Karuah River Catchment Management Plan ......................................... 3 Our Catchment Values ............................................................................................................................ 4 Community / Social Value ................................................................................................................... 5 Economic Value ................................................................................................................................... 5 Environmental Value ........................................................................................................................... 5 Our Past ................................................................................................................................................... 6 Our Current Situation .............................................................................................................................
  • Marlborough Rivers and Their Margins

    Marlborough Rivers and Their Margins

    The Natural Character of selected Marlborough Rivers and their margins May 2014 C10003 Prepared for Marlborough District Council (MDC) Updated Report May 2014 Boffa Miskell Limited: James Bentley, Sally Bishop, Alistair Marshall, Brian McAuslan, Marlborough District Council: Pere Hawes, Peter Hamill This report draws on the findings of the following report: ‘Natural Character: Application of the River Significance Assessment Method to Marlborough District’, past of the River Values Assessment System: Volume 2: Application to cultural, production and environment values. LEaP Report No. 24B, Lincoln University, New Zealand: Neil Deans (Nelson - Marlborough Fish and Game) Val Wadsworth (Marlborough District Council) Brin Williman (Marlborough District Council) Allan Rackham (Boffa Miskell) James Bentley (Boffa Miskell) The Natural Character of selected Marlborough Rivers and their margins The winding nature of the Wairau River channel and its The ox-bow lake of Grove Arm in the Wairau Plain broad semi-braided river bed. Much of the lower banks of the river are lined by willows and gorse. Contents A Section A: INTRODUCTION AND STUDY PROCESS 5 Introduction 6 Study Process 7 B Section B: APPLICATION OF THE METHODOLOGY 9 Definition of Natural Character 10 Naturalness 10 Natural Character Values of Rivers and their margins 14 The River Environment Classification System (REC) 14 Assessment Criteria 16 C Section C SELECTED RIVERS & THEIR MARGINS IN THE MARLBOROUGH REGION 23 Marlborough’s Rivers 24 Wairau River 26 Awatere River 28 Rai and Pelorus Rivers 29 Clarence River 30 Other Rivers within Marlborough 30 D Section D: EVALUATION OF SELECTED RIVERS AND THEIR MARGINS 33 Inventory of Selected Marlborough Rivers 34 E Section E REFERENCES 47 References 48 Websites 48 Section A: INTRODUCTION AND STUDY PROCESS 6 Introduction Marlborough District Council (MDC) engaged Boffa and Mapping the Marlborough Coastal Environment, Miskell Ltd (BML) to assess selected rivers and their (2014), Boffa Miskell et al’.
  • View Our Current Map Listing

    View Our Current Map Listing

    Country (full-text) State (full-text) State Abbreviation County Lake Name Depth (X if no Depth info) Argentina Argentina (INT) Rio de la Plata (INT) Rio de la Plata (From Buenos Aires to Montevideo) Aruba Aruba (INT) Aruba (INT) Aruba Australia Australia (INT) Australia (Entire Country) (INT) Australia (Entire Country) Australia Australia (INT) Queensland (INT) Fraser Island Australia Australia (INT) Cape York Peninsula (INT) Great Barrier Reef (Cape York Peninsula) Australia Australia (INT) New South Wales (INT) Kurnell Peninsula Australia Australia (INT) Queensland (INT) Moreton Island Australia Australia (INT) Sydney Harbor (INT) Sydney Harbor (Greenwich to Point Piper) Australia Australia (INT) Sydney Harbor (INT) Sydney Harbor (Olympic Park to Watsons Bay) Australia Australia (INT) Victoria (INT) Warrnambool Australia Australia (INT) Whitsunday Islands (INT) Whitsunday Islands Austria Austria (INT) Vorarlberg (INT) Lake Constance Bahamas Bahamas (INT) Bahamas (INT) Abaco Island Bahamas Bahamas (INT) Elbow Cay (INT) Elbow Cay Bahamas Bahamas (INT) Bahamas (INT) Eleuthera Island Bahamas Bahamas (INT) Bahamas (INT) Exuma Cays (Staniel Cay with Bitter Guana Cay and Guana Cay South) Bahamas Bahamas (INT) The Exumas (INT) Great Exuma and Little Exuma Islands Bahamas Bahamas (INT) Bahamas (INT) Long Island and Ruma Cay Bahamas Bahamas (INT) New Providence (INT) New Providence Bahamas Bahamas (INT) Bahamas (INT) San Salvador Island Bahamas Bahamas (INT) Waderick Wells Cay (INT) Waderick Wells Cay Barbados Barbados (INT) Barbados (Lesser Antilles)