Zambian Game Management Areas

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Zambian Game Management Areas ZAMBIAN GAME MANAGEMENT AREAS The reasons why they are not functioning as ecologically or economically productive buffer zones and what needs to change for them to fulfil that role Lindsey, P., Nyirenda, V., Barnes, J., Becker, M., Tambling, C., Taylor, A., Watson, F. Photo: C. Masterson A study commissioned and funded by the Wildlife Producers Association of Zambia Contents Executive summary ................................................................................................................................. 4 Potential benefits associated with CWCs ............................................................................................... 8 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 10 Methods ................................................................................................................................................ 12 Literature survey ............................................................................................................................... 12 Stakeholder survey ........................................................................................................................... 12 Estimating current earnings from Game Management Areas .......................................................... 13 Estimating rates of human population growth rate and encroachment in GMAs ........................... 13 Estimating mammalian biomass in GMAs, national parks and extensive game ranches ................. 13 Ecological modelling ......................................................................................................................... 13 Financial and economic modelling .................................................................................................... 14 Statistical analyses ............................................................................................................................ 19 Results and discussion .......................................................................................................................... 20 Review of the ways in which GMAs are failing and the reasons why ............................................... 20 Community-related issues ............................................................................................................ 20 ZAWA-related problems ............................................................................................................... 22 Operator-related issues ................................................................................................................ 24 Other factors contributing to the poor performance of GMAs .................................................... 25 Stakeholders’ perspectives of the relative severity of various threats to wildlife populations declines in GMAs ................................................................................................................................................. 26 Combined effects of these problems .................................................................................................... 27 Ecological impacts ............................................................................................................................. 27 Economic impacts ............................................................................................................................. 31 Social impacts ................................................................................................................................... 32 Changes needed to allow GMAs to function ........................................................................................ 33 1. Changes to the funding support of and focus of ZAWA ........................................................... 33 2. New models for the ownership, structure and functioning of GMAs ...................................... 34 Lessons from other community conservation programmes in southern Africa ........................... 34 Community wildlife conservancies (CWCs) in GMAs .................................................................... 34 Attracting donor support .............................................................................................................. 35 Identifying potentially suitable sites ............................................................................................. 35 Administrative basis and land ownership ..................................................................................... 35 Models for investor participation and stake holdings in CWCs .................................................... 36 Developing a Resource Management Trust for management of wildlife ..................................... 36 Models for how wildlife-based land uses in CWC would be managed ......................................... 37 Structuring of financial benefits for communities ........................................................................ 37 Involvement of ZAWA and ownership of wildlife ......................................................................... 37 Role of fencing .............................................................................................................................. 39 Zambian versus international investors ........................................................................................ 40 Legislation that would need to change to make CWCs possible .................................................. 40 Potential earnings from a model CWC .................................................................................................. 41 Shortcomings of our models ............................................................................................................. 41 Key findings from the modelling exercise and insights into policy issues ......................................... 41 Significantly improved benefits for communities .......................................................................... 41 Low, slow financial slow returns and the need for long leases ..................................................... 43 High economic returns and the case for government/donor investment ..................................... 44 Impact of ZAWA trophy and land fees .............................................................................................. 45 The inability of CWCs to support ZAWA ‘taxation’ ....................................................................... 45 The importance of diversifying income streams ........................................................................... 45 The importance of allowing the hunting of high value species ..................................................... 46 2 Importance of not allowing resident hunting to undermine value of wildlife .............................. 46 Potential benefits associated with CWCs ............................................................................................. 46 Conclusions ........................................................................................................................................... 47 Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................................... 47 Abbreviations CWC= Community wildlife conservancy ERR = Economic rate of return FRR = Financial rate of return IRR = Internal rate of return GMA = Game Management Area GNI = Gross national income NNI = Net national income NPV = Net present value USD = United States Dollar 3 Executive summary Zambia has allocated an impressive proportion of its land surface to wildlife conservation. The protected area is comprised of 20 national parks (covering ~65,000 km2) and 36 game management areas (GMAs) (167,000 km2) and a variety of other protected area categories. Together these areas comprise ~40% of the nation’s land area. Human settlement is generally not permitted in national parks and wildlife-use is limited to non-consumptive photo-tourism. In the GMAs, by contrast, human settlement is permitted and wildlife use is focused primarily on trophy hunting (mainly by foreign nationals) and hunting for meat by local and national residents. Despite their size and potential, the wildlife resources in many GMAs are in a state of steep decline and are not sufficiently productive in ecological, economic or social terms. In this study, by surveying stakeholders, reviewing available literature, and collating available data, we identify the drivers of poor GMA performance make recommendations for improvement, and suggest changes to legislation and policy necessary for this improvement to occur. We then use ecological and financial modelling to develop a proposed model for creating ‘Community Wildlife Conservancies (CWC)’ in GMAs or on un-gazetted customary lands (open areas). We believe that such a structure (and variants of it) has potential to significantly elevate the social, economic and ecological benefits of GMAs. Reasons for the failure of GMAs The reasons for the poor performance in GMAs can be broadly categorized as being those relating to the participation of communities, the Zambia Wildlife Authority (ZAWA) and hunting operators respectively. Community-related issues are primarily related to the fact that local people do not receive adequate benefit flows from wildlife in GMAs, because community ownership of land and wildlife resources is not recognized
Recommended publications
  • Investigating Factors Affecting the Financial
    INVESTIGATING FACTORS AFFECTING THE FINANCIAL SUSTAINABILITY OF CIVIL SOCIETY ORGANISATIONS IN NAMIBIA A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE MASTER OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION DEGREE IN FINANCE OF THE UNIVERSITY OF NAMIBIA BY PHILLEMON EPHRAIM 200211617 APRIL 2019 SUPERVISOR: DR FANNY SARUCHERA (NUST) i ABSTRACT Civil society organisations (CSOs) in developing countries like Namibia experience multiple operational hindrances, especially financial sustainability challenges that lead to the closure of their operations after few years leaving a void in many communities where they operate due to their dependency on foreign funding. Thus, there is need to establish the factors that affect the financial sustainability of these CSOs. The research sought to investigate the factors that affect financial sustainability of CSOs in Namibia. The target population of the research was 300 national CSOs in Namibia that depend on donor funding. The research sampled 80 CSOs and purposive sampling was used to select 1 employee in top management from each CSO giving a sample of 80 respondents. The research was based on primary data which was collected through a structured questionnaire. Content validity index (cvi) was used to establish whether the questionnaire measured what it was meant to measure and test-retest reliability was done where Cronbach’s alpha was used to measure reliability. Both descriptive and inferential statistics were used in analysis of the data. The research indicated and concluded that Income Diversification, Income Generation, Financial Management, Donor Relationship Management and Management Competence affected financial sustainability of CSOs in Namibia. The research further concluded that CSOs in Namibia are financially unsustainable.
    [Show full text]
  • Human-Wildlife Conflict in Africa
    ISSN 0258-6150 157 FAO FORESTRY PAPER 157 Human-wildlife conflict in Africa Causes, consequences Human-wildlife conflict in Africa – Causes, consequences and management strategies and management strategies FAO FAO Cover image: The crocodile is the animal responsible for the most human deaths in Africa Fondation IGF/N. Drunet (children bathing); D. Edderai (crocodile) FAO FORESTRY Human-wildlife PAPER conflict in Africa 157 Causes, consequences and management strategies F. Lamarque International Foundation for the Conservation of Wildlife (Fondation IGF) J. Anderson International Conservation Service (ICS) R. Fergusson Crocodile Conservation and Consulting M. Lagrange African Wildlife Management and Conservation (AWMC) Y. Osei-Owusu Conservation International L. Bakker World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF)–The Netherlands FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS Rome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
    [Show full text]
  • PISC ES Env Ir Onmental Serv Ices (Pt Y) Lt D Namparks Coastal National Parks Development Programme – Cape Cross Desalination Plant
    ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR A CONTAINERISED DESALINATION PLANT AT THE CAPE CROSS RESERVE MARINE ECOLOGY SPECIALIST ASSESSMENT Prepared for SLR Environmental Consulting (Namibia) (Pty) Ltd On behalf of Lund Consulting Engineers Prepared by Andrea Pulfrich September 2020 PISC ES Env ir onmental Serv ices (Pt y) Lt d NamParks Coastal National Parks Development Programme – Cape Cross Desalination Plant OWNERSHIP OF REPORTS AND COPYRIGHTS © 2020 Pisces Environmental Services (Pty) Ltd. All Rights Reserved. This document is the property of the author. The information, ideas and structure are subject to the copyright laws or statutes of South Africa and may not be reproduced in part or in whole, or disclosed to a third party, without prior written permission of the author. Copyright in all documents, drawings and records, whether produced manually or electronically, that form part of this report shall vest in Pisces Environmental Services (Pty) Ltd. None of the documents, drawings or records may be used or applied in any manner, nor may they be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means whatsoever for or to any other person, without the prior written consent of Pisces, except when they are reproduced for purposes of the report objectives as part of the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) undertaken by SLR Environmental Consulting (Namibia) (Pty) Ltd. Andrea Pulfrich Pisces Environmental Services PO Box 302, McGregor 6708, South Africa, Tel: +27 21 782 9553 E-mail: [email protected] Website:
    [Show full text]
  • Making the Invisible Visible | Generating Data on 'Slums'
    Making the invisible visible Generating data on ‘slums’ at local, city and global scales Anni Beukes Working Paper Urban Keywords: December 2015 Urban poverty, enumeration, informal settlements, SDI About the author Anni Beukes, Shack/Slum Dwellers International (SDI), 4 Seymour Rd, Observatory 7925, Cape Town, South Africa. Email: [email protected] Department of Sociology and Social Anthropology, Stellenbosch University, Private Bag X1, Matieland 7602, South Africa. Email: [email protected] Produced by IIED’s Human Settlements Group The Human Settlements Group works to reduce poverty and improve health and housing conditions in the urban centres of Africa, Asia and Latin America. It seeks to combine this with promoting good governance and more ecologically sustainable patterns of urban development and rural-urban linkages. Partner organisation Slum/Shack Dwellers International (SDI) www.sdinet.org SDI is a network of community-based organisations of the urban poor in 33 countries and hundreds of cities and towns across Africa, Asia and Latin America. In each country where SDI has a presence, affiliate organisations come together at the community, city and national level to form federations of the urban poor. Acknowledgements Much gratitude and appreciation to the all the data teams, federation leaders and support staff across the Shack/Slum Dwellers International network, whose patience, commitment and generosity with their time and knowledge, made the building of SDI’s Informal Settlement Knowledge Platform possible. Thank you to the data scientists and technologists who learned and unlearned with us. Thank you to all my colleagues at the SDI Secretariat for your support and indulgence. The biggest thank you, to Celine D’Cruz, who taught me to walk a settlement, sit down and listen, and then return to listen some more.
    [Show full text]
  • Perceived Impact of Mass Media Campaigns on Hiv/Aids
    PERCEIVED IMPACT OF MASS MEDIA CAMPAIGNS ON HIV/AIDS PREVENTION AMONG THE YOUTH IN OSHANA REGION, NORTHERN NAMIBIA A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED IN FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY (INFORMATION STUDIES) IN THE FACULTY OF HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES, DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNICATION AND INFORMATION STUDIES DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF NAMIBIA BY REGINA MPINGANA SHIKONGO APRIL 2010 Main Supervisor : Prof Kingo Mchombu, Department of Information and Communication Studies, University of Namibia Co-supervisor : Prof Agnes van Dyk, School of Nursing and Public Health, University of Namibia 1 ABSTRACT This study explores the perceived impact of mass media campaigns in communicating information on HIV/AIDS prevention to in-school (ISY) and out-of-school youth (OOSY) in Oshana Region, northern Namibia. Mass media campaigns have become one of the acknowledged means for stemming the rapid spread of HIV/AIDS in Africa. Since the first case of HIV/AIDS was diagnosed in Namibia in 1986, HIV/AIDS has become the number one cause of hospitalisation and death among people of all ages and of both sexes in the country. The mass media campaign organisations disseminate information through radio, television and printed materials based on the conventional health education model. Despite the high level of knowledge on HIV/AIDS which the youth were found to have, there is little change in their lifestyle and sexual behaviours and the HIV infections have continued at a high rate in the country. It is against this background that this study was conducted in Oshana Region, northern Namibia, one of the regions with a high HIV/AIDS infection rate in the country.
    [Show full text]
  • Namibia Country Report BTI 2012
    BTI 2012 | Namibia Country Report Status Index 1-10 6.99 # 32 of 128 Political Transformation 1-10 7.70 # 25 of 128 Economic Transformation 1-10 6.29 # 46 of 128 Management Index 1-10 6.03 # 31 of 128 scale: 1 (lowest) to 10 (highest) score rank trend This report is part of the Bertelsmann Stiftung’s Transformation Index (BTI) 2012. The BTI is a global assessment of transition processes in which the state of democracy and market economy as well as the quality of political management in 128 transformation and developing countries are evaluated. More on the BTI at http://www.bti-project.org Please cite as follows: Bertelsmann Stiftung, BTI 2012 — Namibia Country Report. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Stiftung, 2012. © 2012 Bertelsmann Stiftung, Gütersloh BTI 2012 | Namibia 2 Key Indicators Population mn. 2.3 HDI 0.625 GDP p.c. $ 6474 Pop. growth1 % p.a. 1.8 HDI rank of 187 120 Gini Index - Life expectancy years 62 UN Education Index 0.617 Poverty3 % - Urban population % 38.0 Gender inequality2 0.466 Aid per capita $ 150.2 Sources: The World Bank, World Development Indicators 2011 | UNDP, Human Development Report 2011. Footnotes: (1) Average annual growth rate. (2) Gender Inequality Index (GII). (3) Percentage of population living on less than $2 a day. Executive Summary Two decades after gaining independence, Namibia’s democratic and economic transformation continues to progress. As in former years, the presidential and parliamentary elections of 2009, as well as the regional elections of 2010, took place with a remarkable sense of political routine and met the standards of modern democratic elections, with the exception of an appeal due to alleged irregularities.
    [Show full text]
  • Miombo Ecoregion Vision Report
    MIOMBO ECOREGION VISION REPORT Jonathan Timberlake & Emmanuel Chidumayo December 2001 (published 2011) Occasional Publications in Biodiversity No. 20 WWF - SARPO MIOMBO ECOREGION VISION REPORT 2001 (revised August 2011) by Jonathan Timberlake & Emmanuel Chidumayo Occasional Publications in Biodiversity No. 20 Biodiversity Foundation for Africa P.O. Box FM730, Famona, Bulawayo, Zimbabwe PREFACE The Miombo Ecoregion Vision Report was commissioned in 2001 by the Southern Africa Regional Programme Office of the World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF SARPO). It represented the culmination of an ecoregion reconnaissance process led by Bruce Byers (see Byers 2001a, 2001b), followed by an ecoregion-scale mapping process of taxa and areas of interest or importance for various ecological and bio-physical parameters. The report was then used as a basis for more detailed discussions during a series of national workshops held across the region in the early part of 2002. The main purpose of the reconnaissance and visioning process was to initially outline the bio-physical extent and properties of the so-called Miombo Ecoregion (in practice, a collection of smaller previously described ecoregions), to identify the main areas of potential conservation interest and to identify appropriate activities and areas for conservation action. The outline and some features of the Miombo Ecoregion (later termed the Miombo– Mopane Ecoregion by Conservation International, or the Miombo–Mopane Woodlands and Grasslands) are often mentioned (e.g. Burgess et al. 2004). However, apart from two booklets (WWF SARPO 2001, 2003), few details or justifications are publically available, although a modified outline can be found in Frost, Timberlake & Chidumayo (2002). Over the years numerous requests have been made to use and refer to the original document and maps, which had only very restricted distribution.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity in Sub-Saharan Africa and Its Islands Conservation, Management and Sustainable Use
    Biodiversity in Sub-Saharan Africa and its Islands Conservation, Management and Sustainable Use Occasional Papers of the IUCN Species Survival Commission No. 6 IUCN - The World Conservation Union IUCN Species Survival Commission Role of the SSC The Species Survival Commission (SSC) is IUCN's primary source of the 4. To provide advice, information, and expertise to the Secretariat of the scientific and technical information required for the maintenance of biologi- Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna cal diversity through the conservation of endangered and vulnerable species and Flora (CITES) and other international agreements affecting conser- of fauna and flora, whilst recommending and promoting measures for their vation of species or biological diversity. conservation, and for the management of other species of conservation con- cern. Its objective is to mobilize action to prevent the extinction of species, 5. To carry out specific tasks on behalf of the Union, including: sub-species and discrete populations of fauna and flora, thereby not only maintaining biological diversity but improving the status of endangered and • coordination of a programme of activities for the conservation of bio- vulnerable species. logical diversity within the framework of the IUCN Conservation Programme. Objectives of the SSC • promotion of the maintenance of biological diversity by monitoring 1. To participate in the further development, promotion and implementation the status of species and populations of conservation concern. of the World Conservation Strategy; to advise on the development of IUCN's Conservation Programme; to support the implementation of the • development and review of conservation action plans and priorities Programme' and to assist in the development, screening, and monitoring for species and their populations.
    [Show full text]
  • Shiningayamwe2013.Pdf
    i A CASE STUDY ON THE SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC EXPERIENCES OF THE CHILDREN OF THE LIBERATION STRUGGLE AT BERG AUKAS CAMP IN GROOTFONTEIN, OTJOZONDJUPA REGION A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTERS IN EDUCATION IN LIFELONG LEARNING AND COMMUNITY EDUCATION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF NAMIBIA BY DORTHEA NANGHALI ETUWETE SHININGAYAMWE STUDENT NUMBER: 200218794 APRIL 2013 MAIN SUPERVISOR: DR.R K SHALYEFU CO-SUPERVISOR: DR AT.KANYIMBA i ABSTRACT In 1990, when Namibia gained independence, about 43000 exiled Namibians were repatriated back home from different countries. Included in this number were soldiers and refugees including children who were born during the liberation struggle. These children have been called “Exiled Kids,” “Returnees Children,” Ex-War Children,” SWAPO Children” and so on. However, later on they were officially called Children of the Liberation Struggle (CLS) after they had come to prominence in the country through widespread demonstrations, demanding that the government provide them with jobs, better educational opportunities, national identity documents and vocational training. There is little documentation in the literature relating to the social and economic experiences of the CLS. Therefore this research addresses this lacuna. The study applied qualitative research methods; with a mixed research design employing; narrative research and case studies. Data was collected by means of in-depth interviews with twelve (three males and nine females) CLS residing at Berg Aukas. A voice recorder was used to record the interviews with participants. The study found that the CLS grew up in children’s homes/shelters; they had never stayed with their biological parents, some had been brought up by their grandparents and after their death the CLS remained on their own, looking for family members, love, a sense of belonging and for a place they could call home.
    [Show full text]
  • The Tangled Lives of Philip Wetu a Namibian Story About Life Choices and HIV
    The Tangled Lives of Philip Wetu A Namibian story about life choices and HIV A publication in the German Health Practice Collection Published by: German Health Practice Collection Showcasing health and social protection for development Goal The German Health Practice Collection (GHPC) aims to share good practices and lessons learned from health and social protection projects around the world. Since 2004, the Collection has helped assemble a vibrant community of practice among health experts, for health.bmz.de/good-practices whom the process for each publication is as important www as the publication itself as it is set up to generate a @HealthyDEvs number of learning opportunities: The community works together to define good practice, which is then criti- fb.com/HealthyDEvs cally discussed within the community and assessed by independent peer reviewers. Scope The Collection is drawn from projects, programmes and initiatives supported by German Development Co- operation (GDC) and its international and country-level partners around the world. GDC includes the Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ) and its implementing organisations: Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) and KfW Development Bank (KfW). The projects are drawn from a wide range of technical fields and geographi- cal areas, at scales running from the local to the global. The common factor is that they make useful contribu- tions to the current state of knowledge about health and social protection in development settings. Publications All publications in the Collection describe the projects in Join the Community of Practice enough detail to allow for their replication or adaptation Do you know of promising practices in German-supported in different contexts.
    [Show full text]
  • The Miombo Ecoregion
    The Dynamic of the Conservation Estate (DyCe) Summary Report: The Miombo Ecoregion Prepared by UNEP-WCMC and the University of Edinburgh for the Luc Hoffmann Institute Authors: Vansteelant, N., Lewis, E., Eassom, A., Shannon-Farpón, Y., Ryan C.M, Pritchard R., McNicol I., Lehmann C., Fisher J. and Burgess, N. Contents Summary ....................................................................................................................................2 The Luc Hoffmann Institute and the Dynamics of the Conservation Estate project .................3 The Miombo ecoregion ..............................................................................................................3 The Social-Ecological System ...................................................................................................6 The Social System......................................................................................................................7 The Ecological System ..............................................................................................................9 Forest Cover .............................................................................................................................12 Vegetation types.......................................................................................................................13 Biodiversity values...................................................................................................................15 Challenges for conservation .....................................................................................................16
    [Show full text]
  • List of National Parks of Zambia
    Sl. No Name Notes 1 Blue Lagoon National Park A small park in the north of the Kafue Flats west of Lusaka, known chiefly for bird life; one lodge 2 Isangano National Park East of the Bangweulu Swamps, no facilities, little wildlife 3 Kafue National Park World-famous for its animals, one of the world's largest national parks, several lodges 4 Kasanka National Park Privately operated, south of the Bangweulu Swamps, one lodge 5 Lavushi Manda National Park South-east of the Bangweulu Swamps, no facilities, little wildlife 6 Liuwa Plain National Park In the remote far west, no facilities but some large herds of animals 7 Lochinvar National Park A small park south of the Kafue Flats world-famous for bird life and herds of lechwe, one lodge 8 Lower Zambezi National Park East of Lusaka, offers good wildlife viewing on the Zambezi River; one lodge 9 Luambe National Park A small park, close to South Luangwa National Park, recovering after previous neglect, one new lodge 10 Lukusuzi National Park East of Luambe, undeveloped but with potential 11 Lusaka National Park Opened in 2015, a small park on the south-east side of the capital city Lusaka 12 Lusenga Plain National Park East of Lake Mweru, no facilities, no easy access, little wildlife The small park for Victoria Falls on the edge of the city of Livingstone (where accommodation is available), 13 Mosi-oa-Tunya National Park (Victoria Falls National Park) includes a small 'safari park' 14 Mweru Wantipa National Park No facilities, neglected, little wildlife but has potential for redevelopment 15
    [Show full text]