DOCSLIB.ORG

Evaluating the Efficiency Programme

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Evaluating the Efficiency Programme House of Commons Treasury Committee Evaluating the Efficiency Programme Thirteenth Report of Session 2008–09 Report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 21 July 2009 HC 520 Published on Tuesday 28 July 2009 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £0.00 The Treasury Committee The Treasury Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of HM Treasury, HM Revenue & Customs and associated public bodies. Current membership Rt Hon John McFall MP (Labour, West Dunbartonshire) (Chairman) Nick Ainger MP (Labour, Carmarthen West & South Pembrokeshire) Mr Graham Brady MP (Conservative, Altrincham and Sale West) Mr Colin Breed MP (Liberal Democrat, South East Cornwall) Jim Cousins MP (Labour, Newcastle upon Tyne Central) Mr Michael Fallon MP (Conservative, Sevenoaks) (Chairman, Sub-Committee) Ms Sally Keeble MP (Labour, Northampton North) Mr Andrew Love MP (Labour, Edmonton) John Mann MP (Labour, Bassetlaw) Mr James Plaskitt MP (Labour, Warwick and Leamington) John Thurso MP (Liberal Democrat, Caithness, Sutherland and Easter Ross) Mr Mark Todd MP (Labour, South Derbyshire) Mr Andrew Tyrie MP (Conservative, Chichester) Sir Peter Viggers MP (Conservative, Gosport) The following member was also a member of the committee during the inquiry: Mr George Mudie MP (Labour, Leeds East) Powers The Committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No. 152. These are available on the Internet via www.parliament.uk. Publications The Reports and evidence of the Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House. All publications of the Committee (including press notices) are on the Internet at www.parliament.uk/treascom. A list of Reports of the Committee in the current Parliament is at the back of this volume. Committee staff The current staff of the Committee are Dr John Benger (Clerk), Sîan Woodward (Second Clerk and Clerk of the Sub-Committee), Adam Wales, Jon Young, Jay Sheth and Aliya Saied (Committee Specialists), Phil Jones (Senior Committee Assistant), Caroline McElwee (Committee Assistant), Gabrielle Henderson (Committee Support Assistant) and Laura Humble (Media Officer). Contacts All correspondence should be addressed to the Clerks of the Treasury Committee, House of Commons, 7 Millbank, London SW1P 3JA. The telephone number for general enquiries is 020 7219 5769; the Committee’s email address is [email protected]. Evaluating the Efficiency Programme 1 Contents Report Page Summary 3 1 Introduction 5 2 Reviewing Gershon and Lyons 7 The Gershon Efficiency Review 7 The Lyons Review of Public Sector Relocation 8 Did the reported savings represent real efficiencies? 9 The 2007 Comprehensive Spending Review and Budget 2007 11 Staff morale in HMRC 12 3 Finding further savings 15 Public Value Programme 15 Operational Efficiency Programme 15 4 Generating efficiency in a recession 18 Finding an additional £5 billion 18 Dealing with Public Sector Net Debt 19 Public sector pay 19 Headcount reductions 19 Spending cuts and tax rises 19 A culture of efficiency 20 5 Measuring and reporting efficiencies 23 Measuring efficiency 23 Efficiency in the future? 23 Can efficiency occur without the quality of service provision deteriorating? 24 Service quality measurement 25 Reporting efficiencies 26 Conclusions and recommendations 27 Formal minutes of the Treasury Sub-Committee 30 Formal minutes of the Treasury Committee 31 Witnesses 32 List of written evidence 32 Reports from the Treasury Committee during the current Parliament 33 Evaluating the Efficiency Programme 3 Summary Greater efficiency within Government departments has long been proffered as a solution to reducing public spending. Efficiency gains can not only reduce costs but also provide more efficient services. As part of the 2004 Spending Review, the Government launched a wide- ranging and ambitious efficiency programme that set demanding targets for Government departments to achieve monetary savings, headcount reductions and relocation of posts from London and the South-East. Our inquiry looked at the effects of that efficiency programme on the Chancellor’s departments, following the final report published in the 2008 Pre-Budget Report. We also examined the more recent programmes including the Operational Efficiency Programme and the Public Value Programme that were published alongside the 2009 Budget. Gershon Efficiency Review We note that the NAO interim report about Gershon efficiency savings highlights serious problems in measuring efficiency. We raise concerns that the NAO did not audit the final Gershon efficiency savings and that this has led to a lack of confidence on the part of some organisations in respect of the reported savings. We believe that, at a time when the public sector will be pressed to make further efficiencies, it is vital that any savings made are properly recognised and quantified. We call on the Government to continue to work with the NAO to ensure that future efficiencies are accurately measured. Staff morale in HMRC In respect of low staff morale in HMRC, we note that it has been caused, in part, by uncertainty about the future, a lack of understanding about the chosen efficiency targets, especially when service quality is perceived to have fallen, and increased pressure—having to do the same job with less resources. We note that HMRC senior management take the issue of morale seriously but we require greater communication between management and staff. We welcome the Government’s reassurance that training will not suffer as a result of the efficiency programmes. Operational Efficiency Programme In reviewing the proposals published in the Operational Efficiency Programme we recognise that they present significant scope for long term savings. Now, more than ever, efficiency savings that can be made in the public sector will be welcomed. However, we are concerned that these efficiencies will require considerable co-operation between departments to yield the full savings identified in the review. We question whether the necessary structures are in place to facilitate such co–operation and require the Government in its response to this Report to outline the practical steps taken to date. 4 Evaluating the Efficiency Programme Increasing the Value for Money targets We are concerned that additional £5 billion added to the Value for Money target in the 2008 Pre-Budget report was the figure chosen by Ministers without prior consultation with the relevant Departments. We note that this lack of consultation does not inspire confidence. We recommend that the Government, in planning to put the public finances back on a sustainable basis in the medium term, considers a more business-led approach to cost cutting in the public sector than setting an arbitrary target and requiring the civil service to meet it. Measuring Efficiency Finally, we consider the evaluation of the costs and savings of major efficiency programmes, noting that it is currently unclear whether such programmes represent real value for money. We recommend the Government establish robust data collection processes at the start of future efficiency programmes. To ensure that only true efficiencies are captured and reported, it is important that they are measured appropriately and accurately. We expect Government departments to have implemented the NAO’s recommendations concerning measurement. We also recommend that the Treasury monitor the progress of departments’ improvement in measuring efficiency. We will return to this issue after we have reviewed the Chancellor’s departments’ annual reports. Evaluating the Efficiency Programme 5 1 Introduction 1. In introducing his 2009 Budget the Chancellor of the Exchequer, the Rt. Hon. Alistair Darling MP, described it as being designed to “take Britain through the most serious global economic turmoil for over 60 years”.1 Projections set out in the Budget suggested that the UK public sector net debt would more than double from 36.5% of GDP in 2007–08 to 76.2% of GDP in 2013–14.2 Inevitably the severe strain placed on the public finances by the effects of the global financial crisis will cause the Government to review the scope for future efficiency savings within the public sector. 2. Greater efficiency within Government departments has long been proffered as a solution to reducing public spending. Efficiency gains can not only reduce costs but also provide more efficient services. In recent times, the Government has commissioned several reports to advance efficiency within its departments, including Sir Peter Gershon’s 2004 Efficiency Review, Sir Michael Lyons’ Public Sector Relocation Review (also in 2004) and, most recently, the Operational Efficiency Programme and the Public Value Programme published alongside the 2009 Budget.3 However, the efficiency programmes of the past have not always achieved their desired results and indeed some have questioned the extent to which these programmes actually achieved savings. It was within this context that we decided to review the recent efficiency programmes of the Chancellor’s departments. 3. The Gershon Efficiency Programme launched at the time of the 2004 Spending Review was wide-ranging and ambitious. It included demanding targets for overall monetary savings and individual targets for headcount reductions in the Civil Service. It also incorporated targets
Load more

Recommended publications
  • HM Treasury Departmental Report CM 6540
    Cm 6540 DEPARTMENTAL REPORT June 2005 This is part of a series of departmental reports (Cm 6521 to Cm 6548) which, along with the Main Estimates, the document Public Expenditure: Statistical Analyses 2005, and the Supply Estimates 2005-06: Supplementary Budgetary Information, present the Government's expenditure plans for 2005-2008. The complete series of Departmental Reports and Public Expenditure Statistical Analyses 2005 is also available as a set at a discounted price. Departmental Report 2005 Presented to Parliament by the Chancellor of the Exchequer and the Chief Secretary to the Treasury by Command of Her Majesty June 2005 Cm 6540 £26.00 © Crown copyright 2005 The text in this document (excluding the Royal Arms and departmental logos) may be reproduced free of charge in any format or medium providing that it is reproduced accurately and not used in a misleading context. The material must be acknowledged as Crown copyright and the title of the document specified. Any enquiries relating to the copyright in this document should be addressed to: The Licensing Division, HMSO, St Clements House, 2-16 Colegate, Norwich, NR3 1BQ. Fax: 01603 723000 or e-mail: [email protected] Cover Photo: Terry Moore HM Treasury contacts Comments on the coverage or presentation of this report should be sent to: Sara Rowden HM Treasury 1 Horse Guards Road London SW1A 2HQ E-mail: [email protected] For enquiries about the Treasury and its work, contact:Treasury Public Enquiry Unit: Tel: 020 7270 4558 Fax: 020 7270 4574
    [Show full text]
  • An Idiot's Guide to the Private Finance Initiative
    An idiots guide to the Private Finance Initiative A SPECIAL REPORT BY PAUL FOOT This is the story of the Private Finance Initiative: how it became a jewel in the crown of New Labour, its savings, its costs, its pitfalls and windfalls, and how it changed the face of British accountancy and British politics more firmly into the governments programmes. But he insisted that PFI would only work if the whole of the financial risk Im the of a project was transferred from the public sector to the private sector. This caused a Iron lot of concern to private contractors and Chancellor banks. Their directors were prepared to bid for government contracts for which the government was eventually responsible, but were not at all happy about bidding for contracts for which private contractors might be held liable. Another worry was the Labour opposition whose MPs were inclined to oppose such measures as creeping privatisation. So although Two Brains theory was officially adopted by the Tory government, it never really got off the ground. As predicted by the sceptics, the idea infuriated Labour and the trade unions. In 1996 the TUC vigorously opposed PFI and in a Commons debate on 1 May the same year, Labour frontbencher Sam Galbraith got to the root of the matter. The private finance initiative, he Surely concluded, is basically all about Enron government bodies borrowing money but not having it set against the public sector Chancellor? borrowing requirement. He forecast: Today, the private sector will only get involved in the PFI within the health services if it carries no real risk.
    [Show full text]
  • The Lyons and Gershon Reviews and Variations in Civil Service Conditions
    The Lyons and Gershon reviews and variations in civil service conditions Standard Note: SN/PC/2588 Last updated: 26 January 2006 Author: Oonagh Gay Parliament and Constitution Centre Organisational changes to the Civil Service over the past thirty years have meant that the majority of civil servants now work in Departments and Executive Agencies in which the responsibility for pay and conditions are decided locally. Uniform pay structures and conditions of service have been significantly eroded. The Government have launched major reviews into the operation of the civil service, driven by an efficiency agenda. The Lyons review into the location of civil servants reported in March 2004, recommending significant dispersal from London and the south east. The Chancellor has planned for significant cuts in civil service manpower. The Gershon review examined a series of efficiency measures designed to reduce civil servant numbers and was published with the 2004 Spending Review on 12 July 2004. See also Research Paper 03/49 whither the Civil Service? Which gives a detailed analysis of Civil Service reform in recent years and Standard Note SN/SG/2224 Civil Service Statistics. Contents A. Delegating pay and conditions 2 B. Trade union reaction 4 C. The Lyons review 4 1. Background 4 2. Lyons Review Announcement 7 D. Merger of Customs and Excise with Inland Revenue 12 E. The Gershon Review 12 1. Publication of the Gershon report 14 2. Central Government Efficiency 16 3. Local Government Efficiency 18 4. Commentary on Gershon 19 F. Recent developments 21 Standard Notes are compiled for the benefit of Members of Parliament and their personal staff.
    [Show full text]
  • King's Research Portal
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by King's Research Portal King’s Research Portal Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Link to publication record in King's Research Portal Citation for published version (APA): Levitt, R., & Solesbury, W. (2012). Policy Tsars: here to stay but more transparency needed. King's College London. Citing this paper Please note that where the full-text provided on King's Research Portal is the Author Accepted Manuscript or Post-Print version this may differ from the final Published version. If citing, it is advised that you check and use the publisher's definitive version for pagination, volume/issue, and date of publication details. And where the final published version is provided on the Research Portal, if citing you are again advised to check the publisher's website for any subsequent corrections. General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the Research Portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognize and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. •Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the Research Portal for the purpose of private study or research. •You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain •You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the Research Portal Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.
    [Show full text]
  • Spring Inland Revenue 2004 Departmental Report
    DEPARTMENTAL REPORT Expenditure Plans May 2004 Spring Departmental Report The Government’s Expenditure Plans 2004–2006 Cm 6225 Departmental Report 2004 This document is part of a series of Departmental Reports (Cm 6201 to 6231) which, along with the Main Estimates 2004–05, the document Public Expenditure Statistical Analyses 2004, and the Supply Estimates 2004–2005: Supplementary Budgetary Information, present the Government’s expenditure plans for 2003–2006. The complete series of Departmental Reports and Public Expenditure Statistical Analyses 2004 is also available as a set at a discount price. Spring Departmental Report 2004 1 Departmental Report 2004 Inland Revenue Presented to Parliament by the Paymaster General and the Chief Secretary to the Treasury by Command of Her Majesty May 2004 Cm 6225 £14.85 2 Spring Departmental Report 2004 © Crown Copyright 2004 The text in this document (excluding the Royal Arms and departmental logos) may be reproduced free of charge in any format or medium providing that it is reproduced accurately and not used in a misleading context. The material must be acknowledged as Crown Copyright and the title of the document specified. Any enquiries relating to the Copyright in this document should be addressed to The Licensing Division HMSO St Clements House 2-16 Colegate Norwich NR3 1BQ Fax: 01603 723000 or e–mail: licensing@cabinet–office.x.gsi.gov.uk Spring Departmental Report 2004 3 Contents Introduction 04 Medium Term Strategy 08 Delivering Better Public Services PSA Targets 1 to 5 10 Modernising Government 24 Valuation Office Agency 32 Annexes 1 to 6 34 4 Spring Departmental Report 2004 Introduction This year’s spring report sees the Department in the midst of huge changes.
    [Show full text]
  • The Lyons and Gershon Reviews and Variations in Civil Service Conditions
    The Lyons and Gershon reviews and variations in civil service conditions Standard Note: SN/PC/2588 Last updated: 26 January 2006 Author: Oonagh Gay Parliament and Constitution Centre Organisational changes to the Civil Service over the past thirty years have meant that the majority of civil servants now work in Departments and Executive Agencies in which the responsibility for pay and conditions are decided locally. Uniform pay structures and conditions of service have been significantly eroded. The Government have launched major reviews into the operation of the civil service, driven by an efficiency agenda. The Lyons review into the location of civil servants reported in March 2004, recommending significant dispersal from London and the south east. The Chancellor has planned for significant cuts in civil service manpower. The Gershon review examined a series of efficiency measures designed to reduce civil servant numbers and was published with the 2004 Spending Review on 12 July 2004. See also Research Paper 03/49 whither the Civil Service? Which gives a detailed analysis of Civil Service reform in recent years and Standard Note SN/SG/2224 Civil Service Statistics. Contents A. Delegating pay and conditions 2 B. Trade union reaction 4 C. The Lyons review 4 1. Background 4 2. Lyons Review Announcement 7 D. Merger of Customs and Excise with Inland Revenue 12 E. The Gershon Review 12 1. Publication of the Gershon report 14 2. Central Government Efficiency 16 3. Local Government Efficiency 18 4. Commentary on Gershon 19 F. Recent developments 21 Standard Notes are compiled for the benefit of Members of Parliament and their personal staff.
    [Show full text]
  • Government Reimagined
    Government Reimagined A Handbook for Reform Findings from the Policy Exchange Reform of Government Commission, Chaired by Dame Patricia Hodgson Report by Benjamin Barnard Government Reimagined A Handbook for Reform Findings from the Policy Exchange Reform of Government Commission, Chaired by Dame Patricia Hodgson Report by Benjamin Barnard Policy Exchange is the UK’s leading think tank. We are an independent, non-partisan educational charity whose mission is to develop and promote new policy ideas that will deliver better public services, a stronger society and a more dynamic economy. Policy Exchange is committed to an evidence-based approach to policy development and retains copyright and full editorial control over all its written research. We work in partnership with academics and other experts and commission major studies involving thorough empirical research of alternative policy outcomes. We believe that the policy experience of other countries offers important lessons for government in the UK. We also believe that government has much to learn from business and the voluntary sector. Registered charity no: 1096300. Trustees Diana Berry, Alexander Downer, Pamela Dow, Andrew Feldman, David Harding, Patricia Hodgson, Greta Jones, Edward Lee, Charlotte Metcalf, David Ord, Roger Orf, Andrew Roberts, George Robinson, Robert Rosenkranz, William Salomon, Peter Wall, Simon Wolfson, Nigel Wright. Government Reimagined About the Commission The Policy Exchange Reform of Government Commission is comprised of the following members: Dame Patricia Hodgson DBE, Chair of the Policy Exchange Reform of Government Commission. Dame Patricia is Deputy Chair of Policy Exchange. She is a Board member of the Centre for Data Ethics and Innovation, the AI Council and the Science & Technological Facilities Research Council.
    [Show full text]