Spring Inland Revenue 2004 Departmental Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

DEPARTMENTAL REPORT Expenditure Plans May 2004 Spring Departmental Report The Government’s Expenditure Plans 2004–2006 Cm 6225 Departmental Report 2004 This document is part of a series of Departmental Reports (Cm 6201 to 6231) which, along with the Main Estimates 2004–05, the document Public Expenditure Statistical Analyses 2004, and the Supply Estimates 2004–2005: Supplementary Budgetary Information, present the Government’s expenditure plans for 2003–2006. The complete series of Departmental Reports and Public Expenditure Statistical Analyses 2004 is also available as a set at a discount price. Spring Departmental Report 2004 1 Departmental Report 2004 Inland Revenue Presented to Parliament by the Paymaster General and the Chief Secretary to the Treasury by Command of Her Majesty May 2004 Cm 6225 £14.85 2 Spring Departmental Report 2004 © Crown Copyright 2004 The text in this document (excluding the Royal Arms and departmental logos) may be reproduced free of charge in any format or medium providing that it is reproduced accurately and not used in a misleading context. The material must be acknowledged as Crown Copyright and the title of the document specified. Any enquiries relating to the Copyright in this document should be addressed to The Licensing Division HMSO St Clements House 2-16 Colegate Norwich NR3 1BQ Fax: 01603 723000 or e–mail: licensing@cabinet–office.x.gsi.gov.uk Spring Departmental Report 2004 3 Contents Introduction 04 Medium Term Strategy 08 Delivering Better Public Services PSA Targets 1 to 5 10 Modernising Government 24 Valuation Office Agency 32 Annexes 1 to 6 34 4 Spring Departmental Report 2004 Introduction This year’s spring report sees the Department in the midst of huge changes. In his Budget statement on 17 March the Chancellor of the Exchequer announced the outcome of the O’Donnell Review of the Revenue Departments. He accepted its recommendations to create new responsibilities for tax policy with the Treasury taking the lead on tax policy development, and to join together the Inland Revenue and the bulk of HM Customs and Excise to form a new integrated tax Department. The Departments have long and proud records of successful public service delivery and by bringing them together into a new organisation we will be aiming to improve customer service, increase efficiency and reduce compliance costs as well as improve compliance with the law. We will also be making plans to move some more of our people out of London and the South East as a result of Sir Michael Lyons’ review and to make further efficiency savings as a result of Sir Peter Gershon’s review. All this amounts to a substantial agenda for change, but because of our track record with change, I am confident that we are up to the challenges of the year ahead. In the last year we have achieved an enormous amount – a few examples: • Provisional figures show that we collected net tax of around £156 billion and NICs of £72 billion, and we paid out Tax Credits gross of over £13 billion and Child Benefit of over £9 billion. Our National Minimum Wage compliance teams established minimum wage failures in 40% of the cases investigated during the year, identifying wage arrears of over £2.5 million for nearly 10,000 low paid workers. • Over 1m people are now filing their Self-Assessment tax returns with us electronically. Since SA online was launched three years ago we have made many improvements to our product in response to customer feedback and these are clearly paying dividends. 490,471 people claimed their new tax credits on line with a further 6,714,453 carrying out entitlement checks via our website. The speed and efficiency of our e service mean that it is now rapidly becoming an increasingly popular contact channel for large numbers of our customers. • We continued our work on better understanding our customers so as to enable us to make it as easy as possible for them to fulfil their obligations. At the other end of the spectrum we continue to refine our methods for tracking down those Spring Departmental Report 2004 5 people who still aim to cheat or avoid the system. • As a result of the ASPIRE competition we have entered into a contract with CGEY to provide technology services over the next 10 years. I am confident that in CGEY we have found a partner that can help us fulfil the Government’s objectives on modernising public services, welfare reform and the expansion of e service. We look forward to working with CGEY but we thank EDS and Accenture (our previous suppliers) for their support and positive approach to partnership working over the past ten years. Due in no small part to their efforts we have achieved huge improvements in our IT systems and services. • We started making tax credit payments on 7 April, with more than 1 million payments in the first week. We all know the introduction of tax credits did not go smoothly. The early months brought frustrations and difficulties for some of our customers and many of our staff. By July we had overcome the systems difficulties and now six million families are now benefiting from tax credits. I would also like to recognise the personal achievements of two of my Board colleagues who retired this year. Michael Johns CB, Chief Executive of the Valuation Office Agency and a Commissioner of the Board of Inland Revenue, retired on 31 March 2004 after 6 years serving on the Board. Michael’s wisdom, intellectual skills and commitment to the highest standards of public service will be greatly missed. And, of course, Nick Montagu Chairman of the Board of Inland Revenue since July 1997 retired on 19 March 2004. Nick provided the Department with strong leadership through a period of unprecedented change. He was instrumental in embedding diversity into the business of the Inland Revenue and championing business-based diversity across the Civil Service. He led the Inland Revenue to the front of the Government’s ‘e’ agenda and championed the ground breaking customised Corporation Tax portal which was itself the inspiration for the equally ground breaking set of online services recently rolled out to self–assessment customers. Nick also put the Department on a world stage by fostering links and sharing best practise across international tax administrations. We wish Nick and Michael all the best for the future. The Departments achievements over the past year prove that we have the skills and attributes to work alongside our colleagues in HM Customs & Excise to make the new integrated tax Department a real success. We have already started to do so. It is a privilege and a pleasure to fill the chairman’s role at this time and help the Inland Revenue successfully close one chapter of public service history and play its full role in opening another. Ann Chant CB 6 Spring Departmental Report 2004 Purpose of the Report This report summarises the strategy and plans of the Inland Revenue and reports progress on its objectives and performance. The report sets out the main changes in spending plans, compared with those in the 2003 Report (Cm 5925). Status Policy advice and services in relation to the valuation of land are provided by the Valuation Office Agency, an Executive The Inland Revenue is a Government Department managed Agency within the Inland Revenue, managed by a Chief by a Board of Commissioners appointed by Royal Warrant. Executive who is accountable to the Chairman of the Board, The Board consists of: and through the Chairman to the Chancellor of the Exchequer. Chairman Ann Chant CB The 2002 Spending Review set new plans for public spending Deputy Chairman Dave Hartnett CB for 2003–2006. The chart below shows how we will be Director General Helen Ghosh spending our budget for 2004/05. Corporate Services Director General Steve Heminsley IR Funding for 2004/05 (£3.3 billion) Strategic Service Delivery 8% The Chairman of the Board is directly accountable to the 2% Chancellor of the Exchequer for the Department's performance 8% and expenditure. 3% The Board is assisted by a Departmental Board comprising Operations Policy the statutory Board and non–executive members, Kate Owen Corporate Services (Vice President, BP Amoco), Pat Stafford, and Rene Carayol Main Projects - E Services 18% (CEO, Voodoo group). Main Projects - NTC Modernisation of PAYE The Inland Revenue is responsible for: Other projects 3% 58% • collecting income tax; corporation tax; capital gains tax; petroleum revenue tax; inheritance tax, stamp duty, and National Insurance Contributions; • paying tax credits and child benefit; • providing valuation services for rating; council tax; Inland Revenue and other public sector purposes; • providing policy advice to Ministers in all the above areas; • administering Oil and Gas Royalties and enforcing the National Minimum Wage on behalf of Department of Trade and Industry; • collecting student loan repayments. Spring Departmental Report 2004 7 Organisation Chart ANN CHANT CB CHAIRMAN STEVE HEMINSLEY HELEN GHOSH DAVE HARTNETT CB ANDREW HUDSON PHILIP RIDD Strategic Service Corporate Services Revenue Policy Chief Executive VOA Solicitor Delivery (from 7 June 2004) Service Delivery Business Services Marketing & Personal Tax Local Taxation Legislation Support & local services John Yard CBE Communications Tory Orhnial David Park Steve Bousher Marjorie Williams Ian Schoolar IR Southern England E Business Better Guidance Business Tax Finance, Technology Taxes Keith Cartwright Barry Glassberg Roger Hurcombe Mary Hay and Planning Ebrahim Ali John Keelty IR Central England Accommodation Capital and
Recommended publications
  • HM Treasury Departmental Report CM 6540

    HM Treasury Departmental Report CM 6540

    Cm 6540 DEPARTMENTAL REPORT June 2005 This is part of a series of departmental reports (Cm 6521 to Cm 6548) which, along with the Main Estimates, the document Public Expenditure: Statistical Analyses 2005, and the Supply Estimates 2005-06: Supplementary Budgetary Information, present the Government's expenditure plans for 2005-2008. The complete series of Departmental Reports and Public Expenditure Statistical Analyses 2005 is also available as a set at a discounted price. Departmental Report 2005 Presented to Parliament by the Chancellor of the Exchequer and the Chief Secretary to the Treasury by Command of Her Majesty June 2005 Cm 6540 £26.00 © Crown copyright 2005 The text in this document (excluding the Royal Arms and departmental logos) may be reproduced free of charge in any format or medium providing that it is reproduced accurately and not used in a misleading context. The material must be acknowledged as Crown copyright and the title of the document specified. Any enquiries relating to the copyright in this document should be addressed to: The Licensing Division, HMSO, St Clements House, 2-16 Colegate, Norwich, NR3 1BQ. Fax: 01603 723000 or e-mail: [email protected] Cover Photo: Terry Moore HM Treasury contacts Comments on the coverage or presentation of this report should be sent to: Sara Rowden HM Treasury 1 Horse Guards Road London SW1A 2HQ E-mail: [email protected] For enquiries about the Treasury and its work, contact:Treasury Public Enquiry Unit: Tel: 020 7270 4558 Fax: 020 7270 4574
  • An Idiot's Guide to the Private Finance Initiative

    An Idiot's Guide to the Private Finance Initiative

    An idiots guide to the Private Finance Initiative A SPECIAL REPORT BY PAUL FOOT This is the story of the Private Finance Initiative: how it became a jewel in the crown of New Labour, its savings, its costs, its pitfalls and windfalls, and how it changed the face of British accountancy and British politics more firmly into the governments programmes. But he insisted that PFI would only work if the whole of the financial risk Im the of a project was transferred from the public sector to the private sector. This caused a Iron lot of concern to private contractors and Chancellor banks. Their directors were prepared to bid for government contracts for which the government was eventually responsible, but were not at all happy about bidding for contracts for which private contractors might be held liable. Another worry was the Labour opposition whose MPs were inclined to oppose such measures as creeping privatisation. So although Two Brains theory was officially adopted by the Tory government, it never really got off the ground. As predicted by the sceptics, the idea infuriated Labour and the trade unions. In 1996 the TUC vigorously opposed PFI and in a Commons debate on 1 May the same year, Labour frontbencher Sam Galbraith got to the root of the matter. The private finance initiative, he Surely concluded, is basically all about Enron government bodies borrowing money but not having it set against the public sector Chancellor? borrowing requirement. He forecast: Today, the private sector will only get involved in the PFI within the health services if it carries no real risk.
  • Evaluating the Efficiency Programme

    House of Commons Treasury Committee Evaluating the Efficiency Programme Thirteenth Report of Session 2008–09 Report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 21 July 2009 HC 520 Published on Tuesday 28 July 2009 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £0.00 The Treasury Committee The Treasury Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of HM Treasury, HM Revenue & Customs and associated public bodies. Current membership Rt Hon John McFall MP (Labour, West Dunbartonshire) (Chairman) Nick Ainger MP (Labour, Carmarthen West & South Pembrokeshire) Mr Graham Brady MP (Conservative, Altrincham and Sale West) Mr Colin Breed MP (Liberal Democrat, South East Cornwall) Jim Cousins MP (Labour, Newcastle upon Tyne Central) Mr Michael Fallon MP (Conservative, Sevenoaks) (Chairman, Sub-Committee) Ms Sally Keeble MP (Labour, Northampton North) Mr Andrew Love MP (Labour, Edmonton) John Mann MP (Labour, Bassetlaw) Mr James Plaskitt MP (Labour, Warwick and Leamington) John Thurso MP (Liberal Democrat, Caithness, Sutherland and Easter Ross) Mr Mark Todd MP (Labour, South Derbyshire) Mr Andrew Tyrie MP (Conservative, Chichester) Sir Peter Viggers MP (Conservative, Gosport) The following member was also a member of the committee during the inquiry: Mr George Mudie MP (Labour, Leeds East) Powers The Committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No. 152. These are available on the Internet via www.parliament.uk. Publications The Reports and evidence of the Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House.
  • The Lyons and Gershon Reviews and Variations in Civil Service Conditions

    The Lyons and Gershon Reviews and Variations in Civil Service Conditions

    The Lyons and Gershon reviews and variations in civil service conditions Standard Note: SN/PC/2588 Last updated: 26 January 2006 Author: Oonagh Gay Parliament and Constitution Centre Organisational changes to the Civil Service over the past thirty years have meant that the majority of civil servants now work in Departments and Executive Agencies in which the responsibility for pay and conditions are decided locally. Uniform pay structures and conditions of service have been significantly eroded. The Government have launched major reviews into the operation of the civil service, driven by an efficiency agenda. The Lyons review into the location of civil servants reported in March 2004, recommending significant dispersal from London and the south east. The Chancellor has planned for significant cuts in civil service manpower. The Gershon review examined a series of efficiency measures designed to reduce civil servant numbers and was published with the 2004 Spending Review on 12 July 2004. See also Research Paper 03/49 whither the Civil Service? Which gives a detailed analysis of Civil Service reform in recent years and Standard Note SN/SG/2224 Civil Service Statistics. Contents A. Delegating pay and conditions 2 B. Trade union reaction 4 C. The Lyons review 4 1. Background 4 2. Lyons Review Announcement 7 D. Merger of Customs and Excise with Inland Revenue 12 E. The Gershon Review 12 1. Publication of the Gershon report 14 2. Central Government Efficiency 16 3. Local Government Efficiency 18 4. Commentary on Gershon 19 F. Recent developments 21 Standard Notes are compiled for the benefit of Members of Parliament and their personal staff.
  • King's Research Portal

    King's Research Portal

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by King's Research Portal King’s Research Portal Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Link to publication record in King's Research Portal Citation for published version (APA): Levitt, R., & Solesbury, W. (2012). Policy Tsars: here to stay but more transparency needed. King's College London. Citing this paper Please note that where the full-text provided on King's Research Portal is the Author Accepted Manuscript or Post-Print version this may differ from the final Published version. If citing, it is advised that you check and use the publisher's definitive version for pagination, volume/issue, and date of publication details. And where the final published version is provided on the Research Portal, if citing you are again advised to check the publisher's website for any subsequent corrections. General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the Research Portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognize and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. •Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the Research Portal for the purpose of private study or research. •You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain •You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the Research Portal Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.
  • The Lyons and Gershon Reviews and Variations in Civil Service Conditions

    The Lyons and Gershon Reviews and Variations in Civil Service Conditions

    The Lyons and Gershon reviews and variations in civil service conditions Standard Note: SN/PC/2588 Last updated: 26 January 2006 Author: Oonagh Gay Parliament and Constitution Centre Organisational changes to the Civil Service over the past thirty years have meant that the majority of civil servants now work in Departments and Executive Agencies in which the responsibility for pay and conditions are decided locally. Uniform pay structures and conditions of service have been significantly eroded. The Government have launched major reviews into the operation of the civil service, driven by an efficiency agenda. The Lyons review into the location of civil servants reported in March 2004, recommending significant dispersal from London and the south east. The Chancellor has planned for significant cuts in civil service manpower. The Gershon review examined a series of efficiency measures designed to reduce civil servant numbers and was published with the 2004 Spending Review on 12 July 2004. See also Research Paper 03/49 whither the Civil Service? Which gives a detailed analysis of Civil Service reform in recent years and Standard Note SN/SG/2224 Civil Service Statistics. Contents A. Delegating pay and conditions 2 B. Trade union reaction 4 C. The Lyons review 4 1. Background 4 2. Lyons Review Announcement 7 D. Merger of Customs and Excise with Inland Revenue 12 E. The Gershon Review 12 1. Publication of the Gershon report 14 2. Central Government Efficiency 16 3. Local Government Efficiency 18 4. Commentary on Gershon 19 F. Recent developments 21 Standard Notes are compiled for the benefit of Members of Parliament and their personal staff.
  • Government Reimagined

    Government Reimagined

    Government Reimagined A Handbook for Reform Findings from the Policy Exchange Reform of Government Commission, Chaired by Dame Patricia Hodgson Report by Benjamin Barnard Government Reimagined A Handbook for Reform Findings from the Policy Exchange Reform of Government Commission, Chaired by Dame Patricia Hodgson Report by Benjamin Barnard Policy Exchange is the UK’s leading think tank. We are an independent, non-partisan educational charity whose mission is to develop and promote new policy ideas that will deliver better public services, a stronger society and a more dynamic economy. Policy Exchange is committed to an evidence-based approach to policy development and retains copyright and full editorial control over all its written research. We work in partnership with academics and other experts and commission major studies involving thorough empirical research of alternative policy outcomes. We believe that the policy experience of other countries offers important lessons for government in the UK. We also believe that government has much to learn from business and the voluntary sector. Registered charity no: 1096300. Trustees Diana Berry, Alexander Downer, Pamela Dow, Andrew Feldman, David Harding, Patricia Hodgson, Greta Jones, Edward Lee, Charlotte Metcalf, David Ord, Roger Orf, Andrew Roberts, George Robinson, Robert Rosenkranz, William Salomon, Peter Wall, Simon Wolfson, Nigel Wright. Government Reimagined About the Commission The Policy Exchange Reform of Government Commission is comprised of the following members: Dame Patricia Hodgson DBE, Chair of the Policy Exchange Reform of Government Commission. Dame Patricia is Deputy Chair of Policy Exchange. She is a Board member of the Centre for Data Ethics and Innovation, the AI Council and the Science & Technological Facilities Research Council.