Received: 2 December 2019 Revised: 29 May 2020 Accepted: 6 August 2020 DOI: 10.1002/bsl.2486 SPECIAL ISSUE ARTICLE- - Cognitive‐affective drivers of fixation in threat assessment J. Reid Meloy1 | Tahir Rahman2 1Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, California, USA Abstract 2Department of Psychiatry, Washington Pathological fixation – preoccupation with a person or a University at St Louis, St Louis, Missouri, USA cause that is accompanied by deterioration in social and Correspondence occupational functioning – has been found to precede most J. Reid Meloy, Department of Psychiatry, cases of targeted violence. It is clinically observed and University of California, 9500 Gilman Dr, La Jolla, San Diego, CA 92093, USA. theorized to have three different cognitive‐affective Email:
[email protected] drivers: delusion, obsession, or extreme overvalued belief. Each driver is explained, and case examples are provided in the context of threat assessment. Extreme overvalued belief as a new concept is discussed in detail, both its his- torical provenance and its demarcation from delusions and obsessions. Threat management for each separate cogni- tive‐affective driver is briefly summarized, based upon current clinical findings and research. Emphasis is placed upon understanding both the categorical and dimensional nature (intensity) of these cognitive‐affective drivers, and suggested guidelines are offered for the assessment of such in a clinical examination by a forensic psychiatrist or psychologist. 1 | INTRODUCTION Pathological fixation – preoccupation with a particular person or cause that is accompanied by deterioration in social and occupational functioning (Barry‐Walsh, James, & Mullen, 2020; Mullen et al., 2008; Meloy, Hoffmann, Guldimann & James, 2012) – has emerged as a very frequent proximal warning behavior in targeted attacks: violence that is planned, purposeful, and predatory (Meloy, 2006).